UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Noir
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Subject Matter and Visual Analysis Not Long After His Arrival in England, Copley Began to Work on a Historical Commission
Copley did, however, seek the approval of the British art establishment. In 1765, Copley painted a portrait of his younger half-brother Henry Pelham, and sent the painting to the annual exhibition of the Society of Artists of Great Britain.123 Titled Boy with a Flying Squirrel, the painting attracted the attention of Benjamin West, an American-born artist who had moved to London. The painting’s realism highlighted Copley’s ability to convincingly paint a range of textures and surfaces. West wrote to Copley and implored him to come to London and learn the European painting tradition.124 Copley would eventually take West up on his offer, but not for nine years. Until then, he continued to earn a good living by painting portraits of members of Boston and New York society. In 1769, Copley married Susanna Farmham Clarke, the daughter of a wealthy merchant. The couple would eventually have six children together, and due to Copley’s success as a portraitist and his wife’s family money, they were able to purchase property on Beacon Hill next door to John Hancock, one of the wealthiest men in Boston.125 The 1770s were a John Singleton Copley Self-portrait. turbulent time in the city, as tensions with the British were increasing. Copley maintained friendships with both revolutionary and loyalist factions. One of his best-known portrait subjects was Paul Revere, a member of the Sons of Liberty. However, Copley’s father-in-law was a loyalist whose cargo was tossed into Boston Harbor during the Boston Tea Party. As tensions in the city reached a fever pitch, Copley left the country for London in 1774. -
Werkstuk Charles Julien; Oranjezaal Van Het Paleis Huis
Voor mijn vader i de inleiding 2 ii de hoofdpersonen 7 iii de meesters 11 Jacob van Campen 11 Constantijn Huygens 11 Salomon de Bray 12 Thomas Willeboirts Bosschaert 12 Jacob Jordaens 13 Adriaen Hanneman 13 Theodoor van Thulden 14 Caesar Pietersz. van Everdingen 14 Jan Lievens 15 Christiaen Gillisz. van Couwenbergh 16 de inhoud Gonzales Coques 16 Pieter de Grebber 17 Gerard Hermansz. van Honthorst 18 Pieter Claesz Soutman vi de werken 21 noordwand 22 Frederik Hendrik als heerser over de zeeën. 25 Deel van de triomfstoet met meegevoerd goud en zilver. 27 De Nederlandse maagd biedt Frederik Hendrik het opperbevel aan. 29 Deel van de triomfstoet met offerstier. 31 Dit boek werd speciaal vervaardigd in opdracht van Deel van de triomfstoet met olifant en schilderijen. 33 Simone Rijs voor het vak kunstbeschouwing van de Fontys Hogeschool voor de Kunsten te Tilburg Frederik Hendrik ontvangt de survivantie. 35 Deel van de triomfstoet met geschenken uit de Oost en de West. 37 december mmxii oostwand 39 Vormgeving Charles Julien Frederik Hendrik als triomfator. 41 Drukwerk Reclameland.nl Frederik Hendriks standvastigheid. 43 Bij het samenstellen van dit boek heb ik gebruik gemaakt van de informatie die te vinden is op internet en in boe- Deel van de triomfstoet. Amalia met haar dochters als toeschouwers van de triomf 45 ken/publikaties zoals aangegeven achterin het boek. Frederik Hendrik als krijgsman die het water beheerst. 47 De meeste van de gebruikte afbeeldingen komen uit het Allegorie op de tijd. 49 publiek domein van sites als wikipedia, maar ook van het Rijksmuseum, het archief van het RKD te ‘s Gravenhage zuidwand 51 en de KB te ‘s Gravenhage Alle mij bekende bronnen zijn vermeld. -
Hollandse Tuinkunst in Rusland \ Cascade
CASCADE bulletin voor tuinhistorie Jaargang 2012 (21) nummer 2 Hollandse tuinkunst in Rusland Carla en Juliet Oldenburger Inleiding Tsaar Peter de Grote (1672-1725) heeft tussen 1697 en 1717 twee bezoeken gebracht aan West Europa. Waarschijnlijk deed hij dit op initiatief van zijn zeer gewaardeerde Zwitserse vriend Franz Lefort (1655-1699), die ooit in dienst was op een Hollands oorlogsschip en in Rusland tot admiraal was benoemd. Tijdens die reizen bezocht Peter de Grote vorstenhuizen en landhuizen van invloedrijke personen. In Nederland was hij erg onder de indruk van architectuur en tuinarchitectuur en hij wenste dan ook zijn kennis op dit gebied te vergroten om daarmee in Rusland zijn voordeel te doen, zowel bij de opbouw van de stad St. Petersburg als bij de bouw en aanleg van particuliere huizen en bijbehorende tuinen. De invloed van de Hollandse tuinkunst op de Russische is dan ook duidelijk aantoonbaar. In dit artikel worden de kenmerken van ‘Hollandse’ tuinen uit de tijd van Peter de Grote nader belicht. Hoe definiëren Russische collega’s de Hollandse tuinkunst uit het begin van de achttiende eeuw en wat zijn onze (Nederlandse) hedendaagse ideeën daarover? In verband met restauratie-plannen is het uiterst belangrijk standpunten van beide zijden te kennen. Of de opvattingen van Russische en Nederlandse tuinhistorici met elkaar overeenkomen zal in de conclusie worden uitgewerkt. De twee reizen De eerste reis, bekend als het Grote Gezantschap of de Grote Ambassade, maakte Peter van 1697 tot 1698 samen met Franz Lefort en admiraal Fedor A. Golovin (1650-1706). Zij bezochten Koningsbergen, de hoofdstad van Brandenburg, waar Peter onderhandelingen voerde met keurvorst Friedrich III (de latere koning Friedrich I en zoon van Prinses Louise Henriëtte van Nassau). -
National Gallery of Art OPENING EXHIBITIONS CONTINUING EXHIBITIONS Film Programs Helen Frankenthaler: William M
Calendar of Events April 1993 National Gallery of Art 7:00 Concert: The Howard University Diffusion of Classical Art in Antiquity: 12:30 Film: The New York School APRIL Chorale, Dr. Weldon Norris, Greeks in the Land of the Nile 2:30 Gallery Talk: Between Being Conductor, Easter Concert 6:00 Films: Signs of the Times: "Big and Nothingness: Anselm Kiefer's Ben and the Jesus Picture " and "That "Zim Zum " (EB) See bottom panels for introductory 14 WEDNESDAY Little Bit Different" and foreign language tours; see 12:00 Gallery Talk: History Made 7:00 Concert: The Fiftieth American 25 SUNDAY reverse side for complete film and Recorded: Painting in Eighteenth Music Festival, National Gallery 12:00 Gallery Talk: Landscape information. Century Britain (WB) Orchestra, George Marios, Conductor Image and Idea in Lorenzo Lotto's 12:30 Film: Money Man "Allegory" (WB) 1 THURSDAY 20 TUESDAY 2:00 Gallery Talk: The Decorative 12:00 Gallery Talk: John Singleton 15 THURSDAY 12:00 Gallery Talk: French Portraits: Arts: Medieval Treasures (WB) Cop ley's "Watson and the Shark" 12:00 Gallery Talk: Introducing Art: People and Pets (EB) 4:00 Andrew W. Mellon Lecture: (WB)' Abstraction (EB) 1:00 Gallery Talk: Handle with Care: The Diffusion of Classical Art in 12:30 Film: Important Information 12:30 Film: Money Man IJorking with Objects in the National Antiquity: The Arts ofEtruria Inside: John F. Peto and the Idea of 1:00 Gallery Talk: "The Swing" by Gallery (WB) 6:00 Film: The Godless Girl Still-Life Painting Jean-Honore Fragonard (WB) 7:00 Concert: The Fiftieth American 21 WEDNESDAY Music Festival, Phyllis Bryn-Julson, 2 FRIDAY 16 FRIDAY 10:15 Special Course: The World of soprano, Donald Sutherland, piano, 12:00 Gallery Talk: "Palazzo da 12:00 Gallery Talk: Introducing Art: Rubens: Flemish Baroque Painting Rudy J rbsky, oboe Mala " by Claude Monet (WB) Portraiture (WB) 12:00 Gallery Talk: Drawings from 12:30 Film: Important Information 12:30 Film: Mow>-Man the O'Neal Collection (EB) 27 TUESDAY Inside: John F. -
John Singleton Copley's Turquerie Portrait of Margaret Kemble Gage
Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2011 An American "Duchess" in Disguise: John Singleton Copley's Turquerie Portrait of Margaret Kemble Gage Elizabeth Rininger West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Rininger, Elizabeth, "An American "Duchess" in Disguise: John Singleton Copley's Turquerie Portrait of Margaret Kemble Gage" (2011). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4773. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4773 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An American “Duchess” in Disguise: John Singleton Copley’s Turquerie Portrait of Margaret Kemble Gage Elizabeth Rininger Thesis submitted to the College of Creative Arts at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History Dr. Rhonda Reymond, Chair Dr. Janet Snyder Prof. Kristina Olson Division of Art and Design Morgantown, West Virginia 2011 Keywords: John Singleton Copley, Orientalism, Margaret Kemble Gage, Colonial America Copyright 2011 Elizabeth Rininger ABSTRACT An American “Duchess” in Disguise: John Singleton Copley’s Turquerie Portrait of Margaret Kemble Gage Elizabeth Rininger A number of portraits that John Singleton Copley painted in the years prior to the American Revolution show women clad in turquerie. -
Dutch Royal Family
Dutch Royal Family A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 22:31:29 UTC Contents Articles Dutch monarchs family tree 1 Chalon-Arlay 6 Philibert of Chalon 8 Claudia of Chalon 9 Henry III of Nassau-Breda 10 René of Chalon 14 House of Nassau 16 Johann V of Nassau-Vianden-Dietz 34 William I, Count of Nassau-Dillenburg 35 Juliana of Stolberg 37 William the Silent 39 John VI, Count of Nassau-Dillenburg 53 Philip William, Prince of Orange 56 Maurice, Prince of Orange 58 Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange 63 Amalia of Solms-Braunfels 67 Ernest Casimir I, Count of Nassau-Dietz 70 William II, Prince of Orange 73 Mary, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange 77 Charles I of England 80 Countess Albertine Agnes of Nassau 107 William Frederick, Prince of Nassau-Dietz 110 William III of England 114 Mary II of England 133 Henry Casimir II, Prince of Nassau-Dietz 143 John William III, Duke of Saxe-Eisenach 145 John William Friso, Prince of Orange 147 Landgravine Marie Louise of Hesse-Kassel 150 Princess Amalia of Nassau-Dietz 155 Frederick, Hereditary Prince of Baden-Durlach 158 William IV, Prince of Orange 159 Anne, Princess Royal and Princess of Orange 163 George II of Great Britain 167 Princess Carolina of Orange-Nassau 184 Charles Christian, Prince of Nassau-Weilburg 186 William V, Prince of Orange 188 Wilhelmina of Prussia, Princess of Orange 192 Princess Louise of Orange-Nassau 195 William I of the Netherlands -
David Bjelajac CURRENT ADDRESSES
David Bjelajac CURRENT ADDRESSES: Office: Home: Department of Fine Arts and Art History 955 26th Street, NW #607 George Washington University Washington, DC 20037-2040 Washington, DC 20052 (202) 625-0846 (202) 994-7093 [email protected] [email protected] EDUCATION: University of Wisconsin-Madison, B.A. 1972, major in History. M.A. 1973, major in History of Modern Europe. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Ph.D. 1984, Art Department: Modern and American Art. ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: Professor of Art and American Studies, George Washington University, 1998 to present; Chair, Department of Fine Arts and Art History, The George Washington University, 2000 to 2003. Interim Chair, 2006-2007. Associate Professor of Art, George Washington University, 1992-98; Assistant Professor of Art, George Washington University, 1989-92. Assistant Professor of Art and the History of Art and Architecture, Tufts University, 1987-89. Assistant Professor of Art, Corpus Christi State University, 1984-87. PUBLICATIONS: Books: American Art: A Cultural History. Revised and Expanded Second Edition. Prentice Hall, 2005. American Art: A Cultural History. Laurence King, Ltd, Prentice Hall and Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 2000. Washington Allston, Secret Societies, and the Alchemy of Anglo-American Painting. Cambridge University Press, 1997. Millennial Desire and the Apocalyptic Vision of Washington Allston. New Directions in American Art, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1988. Bjelajac 2 Catalogues: Eric Avery: Healing before Art. Corpus Christi, Texas: Weil Gallery, Corpus Christi State University, 1987. Private Visions: The Paul and Mary Haas Collection of Art. Corpus Christi, Texas: Paul and Mary Haas, 1987. Articles, Essays and Book Chapters: “Honey from the Louvre: Gleaning God’s Word from the Old Masters,” in Samuel F. -
(Hrsg.): American Icons : Transatlantic Perspectives on Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century American Art, Santa Monica (Calif.) 1992, S
Originalveröffentlichung in: Gaehtgens, Thomas W. (Hrsg.): American icons : transatlantic perspectives on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century American art, Santa Monica (Calif.) 1992, S. 34-59 l. John Singleton Copley (American), Watson and the Shark, 1778, oil on canvas, 182.1 x 229.7 cm- Washington, D.C., National Gallery of Art, Ferdinand Lammot Belin Fund, no. 1963.6.1. Werner Busch COPLEY, WEST, AND THE TRADITION OF EUROPEAN HIGH ART We have become used to seeing American painting of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries from a European perspective, that is, as an art of only relative merit. In the eighteenth century, American art seems totally depen dent on English models, while in the nineteenth century it is largely domi nated by the influence of the Dusseldorf school. Very often it is precisely the American element in American painting that is considered provincial and naive. Recent exhibitions — such as Thomas Gaehtgens's Bilder aus der Neuen Welt — have tried to do justice to the particular contribution of Ameri can painting.1 As a correction of current views, this is useful and necessarv. In academic discourse, however, established positions are not that readily discarded. I think it justifiable, therefore, to assume the European role once more — playing a kind of devil's advocate. In the following discussion of American history painters working in England at the end of the eighteenth century, I shall argue that the novelty of American history painting — so abundantly stressed in recent critical discussion — is not so much a specifically American phenomenon but instead follows an English tradition and is part of a general change of the European conception of painting in the late eighteenth century. -
Blijde Intocht Van Maria De Medici in Amsterdam 31 Augustus – 5 September 1638
Blijde Intocht van Maria de Medici in Amsterdam 31 augustus – 5 september 1638 Jan van Asch 3129985 Onderzoekseminar III Universiteit van Utrecht, januari 2010 Inhoudsopgave Inleiding 3 1 Een korte geschiedenis van de Blijde Intocht 5 Intochten 5 Antieke tijd 6 Renaissance 7 West Europa in de 16 e eeuw 7 Schrijven over Intochten 9 Propaganda 10 Intochten in de Nederlanden, de Blijde Intocht 10 2 Inleiding en aanleiding tot de Blijde Intocht van 1638 12 Maria de Medici 12 Remonstranten en Contra remonstranten 17 Oorlog 20 De dynastieke ambities van de Stadhouder 23 3 De Blijde Intocht van Maria de Medici 26 Primaire bronnen 27 31 augustus 1638 29 1 september 1638 30 2 september 1638 34 3 september 1638 35 4 september 1638 38 5 september 1638 40 Constructivisme en Propaganda 40 4 Het einde van een rondreis 433 5 Conclusie 477 Literatuurlijst 50 Bronnen (geschreven) 50 Bronnen (digitaal) 511 Jan van Asch, januari 2010 / 2 Inleiding 02 januari 2010; Lopend over het drukke Rokin, waar de werkzaamheden voor de Noord-Zuid lijn in volle gang zijn, is het moeilijk voor te stellen dat daar, ongeveer 370 jaar geleden, een spektakel van een heel andere orde plaats heeft plaatsgevonden. Toch is er sprake van een opvallende gelijkenis. Daar waar de stad Amsterdam zich nu lijkt te vertillen aan de kosten van het prestigieuze project ‘ de Noord-Zuid lijn, schromen de stadsbesturen in het verleden ook niet om grote projecten op te zetten om de grootsheid van de stad te benadrukken. Tegelijkertijd is er ook een verschil; daar waar men nu in de grond moet boren om een tunnel te maken, stroomt er in 1638 (want dat is het jaar waar ik het over zal gaan hebben) nog water in het Rokin. -
Annual Report 1996
• MM 1996 ANNUAL REPORT NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART 1996 Annual Report Copyright © 1997, Board of Trustees, Cover: Hans Hofmann, Autumn Gold (detail), 1957, Details illustrated at section openings: National Gallery of Art, Washington. Robert and Jane Meyerhoff Collection, 1996.81.4 p. 5: James Peale, Fruit Still Life with Chinese Export All rights reserved. Basket, 1824, oil on wood, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Frontispiece: Jan van Huysum, Still Life with Flowers Thomas M. Evans, in Honor of the 50th Anniver- This publication was produced by the and Fruit (detail), c. 1715, Patrons' Permanent Fund sary of the National Gallery of Art, 1990.7.1 and Gift of Philip and Lizanne Cunningham, Editors Office, National Gallery of Art, p. 7: Odilon Redon, Large Vase with Flowers, 1996.80.1 c. 1912, oil on canvas, Gift (Partial and Promised) Editor-in-chief, Frances P. Smyth of John C. Whitehead, in Honor of the 50th Editor, Tarn Curry Bryfogle Photographic Credits: Anniversary of the National Gallery of Art, Editorial Assistant, Mariah Seagle Works of art in the National Gallery of Art's collec- 1990.64.1 tions have been photographed by the department Production Manager, Chris Vogel p. 9: William Michael Harnett, My Gems, 1888, oil of imaging and visual services. Other photographs on wood, Gift of the Avalon Foundation, 1957.5.1 are by: Anthony Grohowski (p. 32), James Locke Designed by Susan Lehmann, (pp. 31-33), Robert Shelley (pp.36, 38), and Rex p. 13: Georges Braque, Still Life: Le Jour, 1929, oil Washington, DC Stucky (p. 60), on canvas, Chester Dale Collection, 1963.10.91 p. -
Årringen 2016-2017
Årringen 2016-2017 Årsskrift nr. 20/21 Arboretet og de botaniske hager Universitetsmuséet i Bergen Spisslønn (Acer platanoides) i bergenstraktene – og litt hagehistorie Per Harald Salvesen, Arboretet og de botaniske hager, Universitetsmuséet i Bergen (per.sal- [email protected]) Dagfinn Moe, Universitetsmuséet i Bergen ([email protected]) Å avgjøre om en plante er viltvoksende i vår flora eller ikke, er en øvelse som har opp- tatt botanikere i generasjoner. I de senere år har dette spørsmålet fått ny aktualitet etter at Artsdatabanken har begynt å gi ut "Norsk svarteliste", en liste over såkalte fremmede arter i Norge (Gederaas et al. 2012). Her blir enkelte arter angitt å ha svært høy risiko for negative virkninger på det naturlige biologiske mangfoldet, mange ene og alene fordi de er i stand til å etablere seg hos oss. Blant trærne har særlig platanlønn (Acer pseudoplatanus) fått status som "værsting", siden den synes å trives utmerket her nord og er konkurransesterk. Den er gjerne omtalt som "særlig aggressiv" og påstås å ville "ta over" for stedegne arter i vegetasjonen (Håland & Mjøs 2001; se Fremstad & Elven 1996 og referanser der). Dette i motsetning til spisslønn (Acer platanoides), som regnes som norsk og derfor ikke er vurdert å utgjøre noen risiko. Nå er ikke denne norskeste av lønneartene så "vill" som vi kanskje liker å tro. Uten menneskelig hjelp ville den neppe ha kommet hit til lands så tidlig, i alle fall ikke til Bergen. De to artene platanlønn og spisslønn kan begge vokse til vakre trær, og de har vært yndet å plante i parker og langs gater, ikke minst siden de tåler godt forurenset luft og er lette å etablere. -
For Immediate Release Artist Ed Copley Designated Living Master Copley Joins the Elite Group of Living Artists Shown in the ARC Museum
For Immediate Release Artist Ed Copley Designated Living Master Copley Joins the Elite Group of Living Artists Shown in the ARC Museum “His work now appears on our ARC Living Masters Gallery on our website as does the work of his Grandfather, John Singleton Copley. Although their work is clearly from two different time periods, it is always a pleasure to see that the artistic quality in the family remained fully intact. Ed is a wonderful addition to the ARC family and we are looking forward to his newest works and exhibitions.” – Kara Lysandra Ross, Director of Operations for the Art Renewal Center. (Scottsdale, AZ – April 26, 2011) - Ed Copley, considered a Master artist whose work is collected around the globe, is now recognized as a Living Master, a very elite award from The Art Renewal Center. But the genes of artistic genius that make Ed Copley (www.edcopleyfineart.com) one of world’s finest painters are more than just heredity. Known as a modern-day old master, Copley paints with an ‘old master’ technique - mixing his own paints, adding glazes, stretching his own canvas and even carving a frame for that special masterpiece. As for Ed Copley’s artistic genes, John Singleton Copley (http://www.artrenewal.org/pages/artist.php?artistid=713) was the greatest American painter of the 18th century. His great, great, great grandson Ed Copley exquisitely follows in those footsteps in the 21st century. Ed Copley Gallery at the Art Renewal Center: http://www.artrenewal.org/pages/artist.php?artistid=7399 “I am very pleased that our esteemed judges saw fit to give Ed the title of ARC Associate Living Master™ and welcome him to the elite group of living artists shown in the ARC Museum.