DOCSLIB.ORG

Foraging Ecology, Sexual Selection, and Divergence in Sunfish (Lepomis Spp.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foraging Ecology, Sexual Selection, and Divergence in Sunfish (Lepomis Spp.) Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 12-13-2013 12:00 AM Foraging ecology, sexual selection, and divergence in sunfish (Lepomis spp.) Scott F. Colborne The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Bryan Neff The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Scott F. Colborne 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Colborne, Scott F., "Foraging ecology, sexual selection, and divergence in sunfish (Lepomis spp.)" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1764. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1764 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORAGING ECOLOGY, SEXUAL SELECTION AND DIVERGENCE IN SUNFISH (LEPOMIS SPP.) (Thesis format: Integrated Article) by Scott Fitzgerald Colborne Graduate Program in Biology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Scott Fitzgerald Colborne 2013 Abstract The origins of novel traits and their contribution to biodiversity have long been of interest to biologists. My research focused on the links between foraging ecology and both natural and sexual selection, and how these mechanisms interact to shape the phenotypic diversification of natural populations. Using bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed sunfish (L. gibbosus), I examined three major questions: 1) how are diet and morphological variation related to alternative reproductive tactics in bluegill; 2) are sexual selection and disruptive selection driving divergence between foraging ecomorphs in pumpkinseed; and 3) how are human-induced changes to prey communities affecting foraging ecology of pumpkinseed. By examining the alternative reproductive tactics of bluegill, I found that the deeper bodied parental males and females consumed more zooplankton as compared to the littoral diets of the more streamlined sneakers, satellites, and juveniles, the opposite relationship from what is typically observed in fish. However, the morphological and swim performance variation among reproductive groups may increase mating success, indicating that sexual selection may be an important factor in the phenotypic diversification of bluegill. I next examined the relationship between stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) in different female tissues (white muscle, liver, and eggs), and found that from pre-fertilization to the day of hatch eggs could be used as a proxy for female diet. By collecting nest guarding males and eggs from their nests it is possible to estimate assortative mating based on foraging tactic. Applying this technique to a wild population of pumpkinseed, I found evidence of phenotypic divergence and assortative mating between foraging tactics. However, there was no evidence of neutral genetic divergence, possibly related to strength of disruptive selection, gen flow by ii cuckolders, or selection on functional loci. Finally, I found that native pumpkinseed sunfish in three populations have undergone substantial shifts in diet following the invasion of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), consuming considerably more zebra mussels and fewer benthic invertebrates than before the invasion. These results contribute to a growing body of evidence that foraging ecology and its relationships with both disruptive natural and sexual selection play a key role in the evolution and diversification of natural populations. Keywords Assortative mating, disruptive selection, ecomorphology, evolution, foraging ecology, invasive species, morphology, sexual selection, stable isotopes, sunfish, swim performance, sympatric speciation iii Co-Authorship Statement A version of Chapter 2 was published in the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (68: 1802-1810, 2011) with Marie-Christine Bellemare, Pedro Peres-Neto, and Bryan Neff as co-authors (see Appendix E for permission to reproduce material). Funding for this project was received from both B.D. Neff and P.R. Peres-Neto. M.C. Bellemare contributed to fish collections and swim performance measurements. All co-authors contributed to experimental design, sampling, and contributed editorial comments to the manuscript. S.F. Colborne was responsible for sampling protocol, fish collection, data analysis and served as the primary author of this publication. A version of Chapter 3 was published in the journal Behavioral Ecology (24:1339-1347, 2013) with Pedro Peres-Neto, Fred Longstaffe, and Bryan Neff as co-authors (see Appendix E for permission to reproduce material). Funding for the project was received by grants to B.D. Neff, P.R. Peres-Neto, F.J. Longstaffe, and S.F. Colborne (see chapter acknowledgements for details of funding sources to each individual). B.D. Neff and P.R. Peres-Neto contributed to the experimental design and editorial comments. F.J. Longstaffe contributed to sample analysis as part of a collaboration with the Laboratory for Stable Isotope Science (LSIS) at The University of Western Ontario, as well as data analysis, and provided editorial comments. S.F. Colborne was the individual primarily responsible for experimental design, sample collection, analysis, and preparation of written materials. A version of Chapter 4 was submitted to the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (under review) with T.J.A. Hain, F.J. Longstaffe, and B.D. Neff as co-authors. Funding for this project was received through grants to B.D. Neff, P.R., Peres-Neto, and S.F. Colborne (see chapter for funding source details). T.J.A. Hain contributed to the iv experimental design, experimental crossing of fish, and editorial comments on the manuscript. F.J. Longstaffe contributed to data analysis and provided editorial comments as part of a collaborative project with the LSIS research group (see chapter 3 above). B.D. Neff contributed to the experimental design and editorial comments of the manuscript. Chapter 5 was completed in collaboration with S.R. Garner, F.J. Longstaffe, and B.D. Neff as co-authors and is currently under review at the journal Evolution. Funding for this project was received through grants to B.D. Neff, F.J. Longstaffe, and S.F. Colborne (see chapter for details). S.R. Garner contributed to the laboratory work and genetic analysis components of this manuscript, as well as providing editorial comments to the chapter. F.J. Longstaffe contributed to the data analysis and provided editorial comments on the chapter. B.D. Neff contributed to the experimental design, statistical analysis, and provided editorial comments on the chapter. A version of Chapter 6 has been submitted to the journal Freshwater Biology for publication and was co-authored with A.M. Clapp, F.J. Longstaffe, and B.D. Neff. Funding for this research was provided to B.D. Neff, F.J. Longstaffe, and S.F. Colborne (see chapter for funding source details). A.M. Clapp completed an undergraduate thesis research project (The University of Western Ontario) which contributed to the data included in this chapter and initial analyses of stomach contents and fish isotopic composition. F.J. Longstaffe contributed to the data analysis and provided editorial comments on this chapter. B.D. Neff contributed to the study design and editorial comments on this chapter. v Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank Bryan Neff, who welcomed me into his lab in May 2009 and has taught me about the scientific process and who I would like to become as a researcher. I have also received guidance from many other faculty members at Western. Fred Longstaffe started as a member of my advisory committee and then welcomed me as a member of the interdisciplinary Laboratory for Stable Isotope Science (LSIS) research group. Chris Guglielmo has provided valuable feedback about my research since my first committee meeting and frequently since that time. I also thank Pedro Peres-Neto, who made my first inter-institutional collaboration a success and who helped me develop the morphological analysis skills used multiple times in my research. I spent almost six months of my Ph.D. studies at the Queen’s University Biological Station (QUBS), a world-class facility for ecology research. Many people contributed to my field work, including Chandra Rodgers, Marie-Christine Bellemare, Tim Hain, Michael Roubakha, Ainsley Furlonger, Adrianna Clapp, Adrienne Berchtold, Malcolm Lau, Aimee Houde, and many students at QUBS who just wanted to come out and learn more about my research. In the lab, I am especially thankful for the help and guidance of Kim Law who taught me more about the technical aspects of isotope analysis then I ever expected. With Kim’s help I never could have run approximately 2000 isotope samples over three years. The past and present members of the Neff lab – Ross Breckels, Melissa Evans, Shawn Garner, Kayla Gradil, Tim Hain, Adam Henkel, Aimee Houde, Malcolm Lau, John Loggie, Nico Muñoz, Charlyn Partridge, Chandra Rodgers, and Jessica Van Zwol – are a special group of people that have made me proud to be a “Neff-ster”. A special thanks to Shawn vi Garner and Charlyn Partridge who provided thorough feedback
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Luth Wfu 0248D 10922.Pdf
    SCALE-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN MOLECULAR AND ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF INFECTION FOR ENDOHELMINTHS FROM CENTRARCHID FISHES BY KYLE E. LUTH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADAUTE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology May 2016 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Gerald W. Esch, Ph.D., Advisor Michael V. K. Sukhdeo, Ph.D., Chair T. Michael Anderson, Ph.D. Herman E. Eure, Ph.D. Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Clifford W. Zeyl, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my PI, Dr. Gerald Esch, for all of the insight, all of the discussions, all of the critiques (not criticisms) of my works, and for the rides to campus when the North Carolina weather decided to drop rain on my stubborn head. The numerous lively debates, exchanges of ideas, voicing of opinions (whether solicited or not), and unerring support, even in the face of my somewhat atypical balance of service work and dissertation work, will not soon be forgotten. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the former Master, and now Doctor, Michael Zimmermann; friend, lab mate, and collecting trip shotgun rider extraordinaire. Although his need of SPF 100 sunscreen often put our collecting trips over budget, I could not have asked for a more enjoyable, easy-going, and hard-working person to spend nearly 2 months and 25,000 miles of fishing filled days and raccoon, gnat, and entrail-filled nights. You are a welcome camping guest any time, especially if you do as good of a job attracting scorpions and ants to yourself (and away from me) as you did on our trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) photo by Clifton Avery Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2018 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepomis Spp. Technical Note Prepared by IUCN for the European Commission
    Information on measures and related costs in relation to species considered for inclusion on the Union list This technical note has been drafted by a team of experts under the supervision of IUCN within the framework of the contract No 07.0202/2016/739524/SER/ENV.D.2 “Technical and Scientific support in relation to the Implementation of Regulation 1143/2014 on Invasive Alien Species”. The information and views set out in this note do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this note. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. This document shall be cited as: Zogaris, S.2017. Information on measures and related costs in relation to species considered for inclusion on the Union list: Lepomis spp. Technical note prepared by IUCN for the European Commission. This technical note provides information on the effectiveness of measures, alongside the required effort and resources, used to prevent the introduction, and to undertake early detection, rapid eradication, and management for the invasive alien species under review. Each table represents a separate measure. Date of completion: 04/12/2017 Comments which could support improvement of this document are welcome. Please send your comments by e-mail to [email protected] Species (scientific name) Genus: Lepomis (Rafinesque,
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The
    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
    [Show full text]
  • ERSS-African Jewelfish (Hemichromis Letourneuxi)
    African Jewelfish (Hemichromis letourneuxi) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, February 2018, July 2018 Web Version, 7/30/2018 Photo: Noel M. Burkhead – USGS. Available: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=457. (February 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Africa: Nile to Senegal and from North Africa to Côte d'Ivoire [Central African Republic, Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan; questionable in Algeria].” From Nico et al. (2018): “Tropical Africa. Widespread in northern, central, and west Africa (Loiselle 1979, 1992; Linke and Staeck 1994) in savannah and oasis habitats.” CABI (2018) reports H. letourneuxi as widespread and native in the following countries: Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sudan, and Uganda. 1 Status in the United States From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “[…] established in Florida, U.S.A.” From Nico et al. (2018): “Established in Florida. Prior to 1972, found only in Miami Canal and canals on western side of Miami International Airport (Hogg 1976a). Species is now abundant and spreading westward and northward.” “The species was first documented as occurring in south Florida in the Hialeah Canal-Miami River Canal system, Miami area, by Rivas (1965). It is now established and abundant in many canals in and around Miami-Dade County, and also in parts of the Everglades freshwater wetlands and tidal habitats (Courtenay et al. 1974; Hogg 1976a, b; Loftus and Kushlan 1987; Loftus et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Fishes of Caddo and Bossier Parishes, Louisiana
    BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES NUMBER 3 CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF CADDO AND BOSSIER PARISHES, LOUISIANA LAURENCE M. HARDY AND WILLIAM H. LEGRANDE SHREVEPORT LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY IN SHREVEPORT 1979 Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES are published at irregular intervals. Articles concerning any aspect of the natural history, systematics, or ecology of the flora and fauna of the southeastern United States are acceptable. Laurence M. Hardy, Editor Communications concerning manuscripts, the purchase or exchange of any number of the BULLETIN, or any editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Museum of Life Sciences, Louisiana State University in Shreveport, 8515 Youree Drive, Shreveport, Louisiana 71115. Date of publication: October 1, 1979 Price for this issue 50¢ This public document was published at a cost of 47 cents per copy by Louisiana State Uni- versity in Shreveport to inform citizens of Louisiana under authority of the Louisiana State Constitution. This material was printed in accordance with the standards for printing by state agencies pursuant to R.S. 43:31. Printing of this material was purchased in accordance with the provisions of Title 43 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. BULLETIN of the MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES Number 3, Pages 1-12 October 1. 1979 CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF CADDO AND BOSSIER PARISHES, LOUISIANA LAURENCE M. HARDY Museum of Life Sciences Louisiana State University in Shreveport 8515 Youree Drive Shreveport, Louisiana 71115 WILLIAM H. LEGRANDE Department of Biology University of Wisconsin/Stevens Point Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 Copyright @ 1979 by Louisiana State University in Shreveport 1979 HARDY AND LEGRANDE: CHECKLIST OF FISHES 3 INTRODUCTION SOURCES OF INFORMATION Species are included in this list on the basis Bossier Parish or on published records in the of museum specimens (examined by one or both scientific literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014
    United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington, DC EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 Laboratory Operations Manual Version 2.0 May 2014 2013‐2014 National Rivers & Streams Assessment Laboratory Operations Manual Version 1.3, May 2014 Page ii of 224 NOTICE The intention of the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐2014 is to provide a comprehensive “State of Flowing Waters” assessment for rivers and streams across the United States. The complete documentation of overall project management, design, methods, quality assurance, and standards is contained in five companion documents: National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Quality Assurance Project Plan EPA‐841‐B‐12‐007 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Site Evaluation Guidelines EPA‐841‐B‐12‐008 National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐ 12‐009a National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable Field Operations Manual EPA‐841‐B‐12‐ 009b National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Laboratory Operations Manual EPA 841‐B‐12‐010 Addendum to the National Rivers and Streams Assessment 2013‐14: Wadeable & Non‐Wadeable Field Operations Manuals This document (Laboratory Operations Manual) contains information on the methods for analyses of the samples to be collected during the project, quality assurance objectives, sample handling, and data reporting. These methods are based on the guidelines developed and followed in the Western Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (Peck et al. 2003). Methods described in this document are to be used specifically in work relating to the NRSA 2013‐2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment Vanessa Trujillo Florida International University, [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-27-2017 Jewels for Dollars: Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment Vanessa Trujillo Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC001758 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Integrative Biology Commons Recommended Citation Trujillo, Vanessa, "Jewels for Dollars: Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment" (2017). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3212. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3212 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida JEWELS FOR DOLLARS: NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FRESHWATER FISH INTERACTIONS IN A STRESSFUL DRY DOWN ENVIRONMENT A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Vanessa Trujillo 2017 To: Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts, Sciences and Education This dissertation, written by Vanessa Trujillo, and entitled Jewels for Dollars: Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. M. Danielle McDonald John C. Withey Robert Lickliter Jennifer S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Choctawhatchee River System in Southeastern Alabama and Northcentral Florida
    Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings Volume 1 Number 55 Number 55 Article 1 January 2015 Fishes of the Choctawhatchee River System in Southeastern Alabama and Northcentral Florida Thomas P. Simon Indiana State University, [email protected] Charles C. Morris US National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, [email protected] Bernard R. Kuhajda Tennessee Aquarium, [email protected] Carter R. Gilbert University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History, [email protected] Henry L. Bart Jr. Tulane University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings See next page for additional authors Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Simon, Thomas P.; Morris, Charles C.; Kuhajda, Bernard R.; Gilbert, Carter R.; Bart, Henry L. Jr.; Rios, Nelson; Stewart, Paul M.; Simon, Thomas P. IV; and Denney, Mitt (2015) "Fishes of the Choctawhatchee River System in Southeastern Alabama and Northcentral Florida," Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings: No. 55. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings/vol1/iss55/1 This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/sfcproceedings. Fishes of the Choctawhatchee River System in Southeastern Alabama and Northcentral Florida Abstract The diversity and distribution of fish species occurring in the Choctawhatchee River drainage in southeastern Alabama and northcentral Florida were surveyed to obtain historical baseline information.
    [Show full text]
  • A HIGH-RESOLUTION MOLECULAR METHOD for IDENTIFICATION of SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH PREY a Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Colleg
    A HIGH-RESOLUTION MOLECULAR METHOD FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SMALLTOOTH SAWFISH PREY A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science By Taylor L. Hancock 2019 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirement for the degree of Master of Science ______________________________ Taylor L. Hancock Approved: Month, Day, 2019 _____________________________ Hidetoshi Urakawa, Ph.D. Committee Chair / Advisor ______________________________ S. Gregory Tolley, Ph.D. ______________________________ Gregg R. Poulakis, Ph.D. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above- mentioned discipline P a g e | i Acknowledgments I thank my family and friends for their constant support throughout my graduate career. Without this ever-present support network, I would not have been able to accomplish this research with such speed and dedication. Thank you to my wife Felicia for her compassion and for always being there for me. Thank you to my son Leo for being an inspiration and motivation to keep diligently working towards a better future for him, in sense of our own lives, but also the state of the environment we dwell within. Music also played a large part in accomplishing long nights of work, allowing me to push through long monotonous tasks to the songs of Modest Mouse, Alice in Chains, Jim Croce, TWRP, Led Zeppelin, and many others—to them I say thank you for your art.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
    c=85 m=19 y=0 k=0 c=57 m=80 y=100 k=45 c=20 m=0 y=40 k=6 Arkansas Aquaticc=15 m=29 y=33 k=0 c=100 Nuisance m=0 y=91 k=42 c=30 m=0 y=5 k=0 Species Management Plan May 14, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 7 The Natural Setting ..................................................................................................................... 7 The Biodiversity.......................................................................................................................... 9 The Human Element ................................................................................................................... 9 The Threat of Aquatic Nuisance Species .................................................................................. 11 The Development of a Plan ....................................................................................................... 12 ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................... 14 Private Aquaculture in Arkansas .............................................................................................. 14 Management and Control
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States by Melvin L
    CONSERVATION m Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States By Melvin L. Warren, Jr., Brooks M. Burr, Stephen J. Walsh, Henry L. Bart, Jr., Robert C. Cashner, David A. Etnier, Byron J. Freeman, Bernard R. Kuhajda, Richard L. Mayden, Henry W. Robison, Stephen T. Ross, and Wayne C. Starnes ABSTRACT The Southeastern Fishes Council Technical Advisory Committee reviewed the diversity, distribution, and status of all native freshwater and diadromous fishes across 51 major drainage units of the southern United States. The southern United States supports more native fishes than any area of comparable size on the North American continent north of Mexico, but also has a high proportion of its fishes in need of conservation action. The review included 662 native freshwater and diadromous fishes and 24 marine fishes that are significant components of freshwater ecosystems. Of this total, 560 described, freshwater fish species are documented, and 49 undescribed species are included provisionally pending formal description. Described subspecies (86) are recognized within 43 species, 6 fishes have undescribed sub- species, and 9 others are recognized as complexes of undescribed taxa. Extinct, endangered, threatened, or vulnerable status is recognized for 28% (187 taxa) of southern freshwater and diadromous fishes. To date, 3 southern fishes are known to be extinct throughout their ranges, 2 are extirpated from the study region, and 2 others may be extinct. Of the extant southern fishes, 41 (6%) are regarded as endangered, 46 (7%) are regarded as threatened, and 101 (15%) are regarded as vulnerable. Five marine fishes that frequent fresh water are regarded as vulnerable.
    [Show full text]