DOCSLIB.ORG

MPS JUDGMENT CPC 16 of 2013.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA CONSOLIDATED PETITIONS 5 1. CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 16 OF 2013 1. HON.LT(RTD) SALEH M.W.KAMBA 2. MS AGASHA MARY ....................... PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 10 2. HON.THEODORE SSEKIKUBO 3. HON.WILFRED NIWAGABA .... RESPONDENTS 4. HON.MOHAMMED NSEREKO 5. HON.BARNABAS TINKASIMIRE 15 AND CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION NO.14 OF 2013 ARISING FROM CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 16 OF 2013 2. CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO.21 OF 2013 NATIONAL RESISTANCE MOVEMENT....PETITIONER 20 VERSUS 1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 2. HON.THEODORE SSEKIKUBO.... RESPONDENTS 3. HON.WILFRED NIWAGABA 4. HON.MOHAMMED NSEREKO 25 5. HON.BARNABAS TINKASIMIRE AND CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION NO.25 OF 2013 ARISING FROM CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 21 OF 2013 3. CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO.19 OF 2013 1 JOSEPH KWESIGA...................................PETITIONER VERSUS ATTORNEY GENERAL..............................RESPONDENT 5 4. CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO.25 OF 2013 HON.ABDU KATUNTU..............................PETITIONER (SHADOW ATTORNEY GENERAL) 10 VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.....................RESPONDENT 15 CORAM: HON.MR. JUSTICE S.B.K KAVUMA AG. DCJ/PCC, HON. MR. JUSTICE A.S. NSHIMYE JA/JCC, HON. MR. JUSTICE REMMY KASULE JA/JCC, HON. LADY JUSTICE FAITH MWONDHA JA/JCC, HON. MR. JUSTICE RICHARD BUTEERA JA/JCC, 20 JUDGMENT OF: HON. MR. JUSTICE S.B.K KAVUMA AG. DCJ/PCC HON. MR. JUSTICE A.S. NSHIMYE JA/JCC, 25 HON. MR. JUSTICE RICHARD BUTEERA JA/JCC, Introduction Constitutional petition Nos 16,19,21 and 25 of 2013 were 30 filed into this court separately and later consolidated. Nearly at the same time, the Constitutional Application Nos.16, 14 and 23 of 2013, arising from Constitutional 2 Petitions Nos. 16 and 21 were also filed separately. The Court decided to consolidate the said Petitions and Constitutional Applications and hear them together. 5 Facts and background The facts from which the consolidated Constitutional Petitions and Applications arise are as follows: The 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents in Constitutional Petition Nos.16 and 21 of 2013 are the elected Members of 10 Parliament (MPs), representing Lwemiyaga County in Sembabule District, Ndorwa East, Kabale District, Kampala Central, Kampala District,(Now Kampala Capital City Authority), and Buyaga East, Kibale District Constituencies respectively. They all once belonged to the National 15 Resistance Movement (NRM) Party. On 14th April 2013, the Central Executive Committee (CEC) of the NRM expelled the four from the party on grounds that they had acted/behaved in a manner that contravened various provisions of the party constitution. The 20 respondents challenged their expulsion in the High Court and the matter is still pending. 3 Following the expulsion of the said four MPs from the NRM party, the Secretary General of the Party wrote to the Rt. Hon. Speaker of Parliament informing her of the party‟s decision and requesting her to direct the Clerk to 5 Parliament to declare the seats of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents in Parliament vacant to enable the Electoral Commission conduct by-elections in their constituencies. On the 2nd of May 2013, the Rt. Hon. Speaker in her ruling in Parliament declined to declare the seats vacant and 10 upon that refusal, Hon. Lt. (Rtd) Saleh Kamba and Ms.Agasha Marym filed Constitutional Petition No.16 of 2013 in this Court challenging the constitutionality of the Speaker‟s decision. Similarly Mr. Joseph Kwesiga filed Constitutional Petition 15 No. 19 of 2013 challenging the same decision. This was followed by Constitutional Petition No. 21 of 2013 which was filed by the National Resistance Movement party also challenging the same decision. On 8th May 2013, the Attorney General wrote to the Rt. 20 Hon. Speaker of Parliament advising her to reverse her decision on the grounds that it was unconstitutional. Constitutional Petition No.25 of 2013 filed by the Shadow 4 Attorney General, Hon. A. Katuntu challenges the Attorney General‟s advice to the Speaker. The Attorney General filed a reply, in addition to which he filed a cross Petition to Constitutional Petition No. 25 of 5 2013. The scheduling conference conducted inter parties, left a disputed fact as to whether the Speaker allocated the expelled MPs special seats in Parliament. At the said scheduling conference, counsel for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th 10 respondents also raised a preliminary objection as to whether Constitutional Petition Nos 16 and 21 disclosed a cause of action. At the scheduling conference, 13 issues were framed and at the commencement of the hearing of the consolidated 15 Constitutional Petitions issue No.7 was framed by court bringing the total number of issues to 14 substantially listed as below:- 1. Whether the expulsion from a political party is a ground for a Member of Parliament to lose his / her 20 seat in Parliament under Article 83(i)(g) of the 1995 Constitution of Uganda. 5 2. Whether the act of the Rt.Hon. Speaker in the ruling made on the 2nd of May 2013 to the effect that the 4 MPs who were expelled from the National Resistance Movement (NRM), the party for 5 which they stood as candidates for election to Parliament should retain their respective seats in Parliament is inconsistent with or in contravention of the named constitutional provisions. 3. Whether the Rt.Hon.Speaker of Parliament in her 10 communication created a peculiar category of Members of Parliament, peculiar to the Constitution. 4. Whether the continued stay in Parliament of the four MPs after their expulsion from the NRM Party 15 on whose ticket they were elected is contrary to and/or inconsistent with Articles 1(1) (2)(4), 2(1), 21(1)(2), 29(1)(e), 38(1), 43(1), 45, 69(1), 71, 72(1), 72(2), 72(4), 78(1), 79(1)(3) and 255(3) of the Constitution. 20 5. Whether the said expelled MPs who left and/or ceased being members of the Petitioner vacated their respective seats in Parliament and are no 6 longer Members of Parliament as contemplated by the Constitution. 6. Whether the said expelled MPs vacated their respective seats in Parliament and are no longer 5 Members of Parliament as contemplated by the Constitution. 7. Whether the Court should grant a Temporary injunction stopping the said four members of Parliament from sitting in Parliament pending the 10 determination of the consolidated constitutional petitions. 8. Whether the Rt.Hon. Speaker had jurisdiction to make a ruling on such a matter and whether her action is inconsistent with or in contravention of 15 the Constitution. 9. Whether the act of the Attorney General of advising that the only persons who can sit in Parliament under a multiparty political system are members of political parties and representatives of 20 the army is inconsistent with and in contravention of Article 78 of the Constitution. 10. Whether the act of the Attorney General of advising that after their expulsion from the NRM 7 Party, Hon. Theodore Ssekikubo, Hon. Wilfred Niwagaba, Hon. Mohammed Nsereko and Hon. Barnabas Tinkasimire are no longer Members of Parliament, is inconsistent with and in 5 contravention of Article 83(1) (g) of the Constitution. 11. Whether the act of the Attorney General of advising the Speaker of Parliament to declare the seats of Hon. Theodore Ssekikubo, Hon. Wilfred 10 Niwagaba, Hon. Mohammed Nsereko and Hon. Barnabas Tinkasimire in Parliament, are now vacant because of their expulsion from the NRM Party is inconsistent with and or in contravention of Article 86(1) (a) of the Constitution. 15 12. Whether the act of the Attorney General of advising the Speaker of Parliament to reverse her ruling on whether the seats of Hon. Theodore Ssekikubo, Hon. Wilfred Niwagaba, Hon. Mohammed Nsereko and Hon. Barnabas 20 Tinkasimire is inconsistent with and or in contravention of Article 119 of the Constitution. 13. Whether the act of the Attorney General of advising the Speaker of Parliament to reverse her 8 ruling on whether the seats of Hon. Theodore Ssekikubo, Hon. Wilfred Niwagaba, Hon. Mohammed Nsereko and Hon. Barnabas Tinkasimire are vacant when the said ruling is the 5 subject of court‟s interpretation in Constitutional Petition No.16 of 2013, where the Attorney General is the 1st respondent, is inconsistent with and in contravention of Article 137 of the Constitution. 14. What remedies are available to the parties? 10 Representation Petitioners/Applicants At the hearing of the consolidated Constitutional Petitions and the applications, Counsel John Mary Mugisha (lead 15 Counsel), Joseph Matsiko, Chris John Bakiza Sam Mayanja and Severino Twinobusingye represented the Petitioners in Constitutional Petition Nos 16 and 21 of 2013 and in application No.14 and 23 of 2013. Counsel Elison Karuhanga represented the petitioner in 20 Constitutional Petition No. 19 of 2013. 9 Counsel Peter Mukidi Walubiri represented the Petitioner in Constitutional Petition No. 25 of 2013. Attorney General 5 The first respondent in all the above consolidated Petitions and the cross Petitioner in Constitutional Petition No. 25/2013 was represented by Mr. Cheborion Barishaki, the Director of Civil litigation at the Attorney General‟s Chambers, Ms Patricia Mutesi, Principal State Attorney, 10 Mr. Richard Adrole, Ms Moureen Ijang, and Ms Imelda Adongo all State Attorneys at the same chambers. Counsel for the respondents in Constitutional Petition No.16 and Constitutional applications Nos. 14 and 23 of 2013. 15 The 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents in Constitutional Petition Nos 16 and 21 and Constitutional Application Nos. 14 and 23 of 2013 were represented by Counsel Prof.G.W.Kanyeihamba (lead Counsel), Prof. Fred Sempebwa, Ben Wacha, Wandera Ogalo, Emmanuel Orono, 20 Medard Sseggona, Kyazze Joseph, Galisonga Julius, and Caleb Alaka. 10 Principles of Constitutional interpretation We find it appropriate at this juncture to restate some of the time tested principles of constitutional interpretation we consider relevant to the determination of Constitutional 5 Petitions and Applications before court.
Recommended publications
  • Advertising and the Market Orientation of Political Parties Contesting the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand General Election Campaigns

    Advertising and the Market Orientation of Political Parties Contesting the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand General Election Campaigns

    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. ADVERTISING AND THE MARKET ORIENTATION OF POLITICAL PARTIES CONTESTING THE 1999 AND 2002 NEW ZEALAND GENERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS A THESIS PRESENTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICS AT MASSEY UNIVERSITY, PALMERSTON NORTH, NEW ZEALAND. CLAIRE ELIZABETH ROBINSON 2006 i ABSTRACT This thesis proposes an alternative way of establishing a link between market orientation and electoral success, by focusing on market orientation as a message instead of as a management function. Using interpretive textual analysis the thesis examines the advertising messages of the highest polling political parties for evidence of voter orientation and competitor orientation in the 1999 and 2002 New Zealand general election campaigns. Relating manifest market orientation to a number of statistical indicators of electoral success the thesis looks for plausible associations between the visual manifestation of market orientation in political advertisements and parties’ achievement of their party vote goals in the 1999 and 2002 elections. It offers party-focused explanations for electoral outcomes to complement existing voter-centric explanations, and adds another level of scholarly understanding of recent electoral outcomes in New Zealand. While the thesis finds little association between demonstration ofcompetitor orientation in political advertisements and electoral success, it finds a plausible relationship between parties that demonstrated a voter orientation in their political advertisements and goal achievement.
  • Women Talking Politics

    Women Talking Politics

    Women Talking Politics A research magazine of the NZPSA New Zealand Political Studies Association Te Kāhui Tātai Tōrangapū o Aotearoa November 2018 ISSN: 1175-1542 wtp Contents From the editors .............................................................................................................................. 4 New Zealand women political leaders today ................................ 6 Claire Timperley - Jacinda Ardern: A Transformational Leader? ............................................. 6 Jean Drage - New Zealand’s new women MPs discuss their first year in Parliament ............. 12 The 148 Women in New Zealand’s Parliament, 1933 – 2018 ................................................. 21 Articles .............................................................................................................................. 25 Julie MacArthur & Noelle Dumo - Empowering Women’s Work? Analysing the Role of Women in New Zealand’s Energy Sector ............................................................................... 25 Igiebor Oluwakemi - Informal Practices and Women’s Progression to Academic Leadership Positions in Nigeria ................................................................................................................ 31 Gay Marie Francisco - The Philippines’ ‘Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity or Expression Equality’ Bill: Who Represents the LGBTQ? ........................................................ 33 Emily Beausoleil - Gathering at the Gate: Listening Intergenerationally as a Precursor to
  • Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD)

    Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD)

    First Session, Forty-seventh Parliament, 2002-2003 Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD) Tuesday, 10 June 2003 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2003 ISSN 0114-992 X TUESDAY, 10 JUNE 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISITORS— Speaker of the House of Representatives, Australia..........................................6037 OBITUARIES— Hon Philip North Holloway CMG.....................................................................6037 MOTIONS— Crop and Food Research—Air Accident...........................................................6037 MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS— Iraq—New Zealand Assistance .........................................................................6040 QUESTIONS FOR ORAL ANSWER— Questions to Ministers— Iraq—Peacekeepers.......................................................................................6047 Rail Network—Protection.............................................................................6048 United States—Prime Minister's Views........................................................6050 Housing—Supply..........................................................................................6051 Immigrants—Qualifications..........................................................................6052 Te Māngai Pāho—Māori Sportscasting International ..................................6053 Reports—United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child.................6056 Māori Development—Expenditure...............................................................6057 Legislation—Guardianship
  • IMPORTANT NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE Labour Is Trying to Decimate the NZ Health Products Industry Labour Is Trying to Decimate the NZ Health Products Industry

    IMPORTANT NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE Labour Is Trying to Decimate the NZ Health Products Industry Labour Is Trying to Decimate the NZ Health Products Industry

    IMPORTANT NOTICE IMPORTANT NOTICE Labour is trying to decimate the NZ Health Products Industry Labour is trying to decimate the NZ Health Products Industry The Labour Government is trying to change the way in which all Natural Health Products (NHPs) The Labour Government is trying to change the way in which all Natural Health Products (NHPs) & medical devices are regulated. They plan to treat them as medicines and give the power to & medical devices are regulated. They plan to treat them as medicines and give the power to control them to the controversial Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) control them to the controversial Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) We know from the Australian experience that this would mean; We know from the Australian experience that this would mean; • Fewer products available - consumer choice reduced • Fewer products available - consumer choice reduced • Unnecessary bureaucracy and cost • Unnecessary bureaucracy and cost • Increased cost to consumers • Increased cost to consumers • Natural health products & medical devices all controlled like drugs • Natural health products & medical devices all controlled like drugs • Many NZ businesses forced to close - jobs lost • Many NZ businesses forced to close - jobs lost • There will be little NZ can do to protect itself – Australia would make decisions for NZ • There will be little NZ can do to protect itself – Australia would make decisions for NZ The Australian TGA (which would take over NZ’s health products industry) is known to use an The Australian TGA (which would take over NZ’s health products industry) is known to use an extremely heavy-handed approach.

  • Parliamentary Service 2 Annual Report 2016 - 2017

    A. 13 1 Annual Report 2016 - 2017 Parliamentary Service 2 Annual Report 2016 - 2017 Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to section 44(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989 ISSN 2324-2868 (Print) ISSN 2324-2876 (Online) Copyright Except for images with existing copyright and the Parliamentary Service logo, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Non-commercial-Share Alike 3.0 New Zealand licence. You are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes as long as you attribute the work to the Parliamentary Service and abide by the other licence terms. Note: the use of any Parliamentary logo [by any person or organisation outside of the New Zealand Parliament] is contrary to law. To view a copy of this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licences/ by-nc-sa/3.0/nz 3 Contents 5 Foreword: Speaker of the House of Representatives 6 Delivering a better service 9 About Us 13 Highlights from 2016/17 15 Our achievements this year 19 Supporting our people to support members 25 Measuring our performance 32 Statement of responsibility 33 Independent Auditor’s Report 37 Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2017 4 Annual Report 2016 - 2017 5 Foreword: Speaker of the House of Representatives The Parliamentary Service (the Service) supports the institution of Parliament by providing administrative and support services to the House of Representatives and its members of Parliament. It has been another fulfilling and productive year for the Significant work continues Service, as it continues to enhance its ability to better to create a Parliament that support members of Parliament and make Parliament itself is safe and accessible to all.

  • Women, Politics and the Media

    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Women, Politics and the Media: The 1999 New Zealand General Election A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in Communication & Journalism at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Susan Lyndsey Fountaine 2002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to say thank you very much to my supervisors, Professor Judy McGregor and Dr Margie Comrie, from the Department of Communication & Journalism at Massey University. Their guidance, insight, on-going support and humour sustained me, and were always greatly appreciated. Thank you to all the women politicians who participated in the interviews, especially Marian Hobbs, who gave up valuable time during the election campaign. I also acknowledge the help of Associate Professor Marilyn Waring in gaining access to National women MPs. There are many other people who gave valuable advice and provided support. Thank you to Dr Ted Drawneek, Mark Sullman and Lance Gray fo r much-needed statistical help, and to Shaz Benson and Wendy Pearce fo r assistance with fo rmatting and layout. Thanks also to Doug Ashwell and Marianne Tremaine, "fellow travellers" in the Department of Communication & Journalism, and Arne Evans fo r codingvalidation. I would also like to acknowledge the assistance I received from Massey University, in the fo rm of an Academic Women's Award. This allowed me to take time off from other duties, and I must thank Joanne Cleland fo r the great work she did in my absence.
  • The New Zealand Azette

    The New Zealand Azette

    Issue No. 113 • 2299 The New Zealand azette WELLINGTON: THURSDAY, 5 JULY 1990 Contents Parliamentary Summary 2300 Government Notices 2302 Authorities and Other Agencies of State Notices 2313 Land Notices 2313 Regulation Summary 2323 General Section 2324 Using the Gazette The New Zealand Gazette, the official newspaper of the Closing time for lodgment of notices at the Gazette Office: Government of New Zealand, is published weekly on 12 noon on Tuesdays prior to publication (except for holiday Thursdays. Publishing time is 4 p.m. periods when special advice of earlier closing times will be Notices for publication and related correspondence should be given). addressed to: Notices are accepted for publication in the next available issue, Gazette Office, unless otherwise specified. Department of Internal Affairs, P.O. Box 805, Notices being submitted for publication must be a reproduced Wellington. copy of the original. Dates, proper names and signatures are Telephone (04) 738 699 to be shown clearly. A covering instruction setting out require­ Facsimile (04) 499 1865 ments must accompany a ll notices. or lodged at the Gazette Office, Seventh Floor, Dalmuir Copy wi ll be returned unpublished if not submitted in House, 114 The Terrace, Wellington. accordance with these requirements. 2300 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 113 Availability Government Buildings, 1 George Street, Palmerston North. The New Zealand Gazette is available on subscription from the Government Printing Office Publications Division or over the Cargill House, 123 Princes Street, Dunedin. counter from Government Bookshops at: Housing Corporation Building, 25 Rutland Street, Auckland. Other issues of the Gazette: 33 Kings Street, Frankton, Hamilton.
  • Why New Zealand Took Itself out of ANZUS: Observing ‘‘Opposition for Autonomy’’ in Asymmetric Alliances1

    Why New Zealand Took Itself out of ANZUS: Observing ‘‘Opposition for Autonomy’’ in Asymmetric Alliances1

    Foreign Policy Analysis (2010) 6, 317–338 Why New Zealand Took Itself out of ANZUS: Observing ‘‘Opposition for Autonomy’’ in Asymmetric Alliances1 Amy L. Catalinac Harvard University In 1985, a dispute over nuclear ship visits led the United States to for- mally suspend its security guarantee to New Zealand under the trilateral ANZUS Treaty. In this article, I conceptualize this dispute as a case of intra-alliance opposition by a small state toward its stronger ally. I gener- ate four hypotheses from the literature on alliances in international relations to explain why New Zealand chose to oppose its ally on the nuclear ships issue. Using new evidence, including interviews with 22 individuals involved in the dispute and content analysis of debates in the New Zealand parliament from 1976 to 1984, I conclude that a desire for greater autonomy in foreign policy was the driving factor behind New Zealand’s opposition. The Spat that Ended ANZUS In July 1984, the New Zealand Labour Party fought and won a general election on a commitment to make New Zealand ‘‘nuclear-free.’’ If elected, Labour promised that it would ban the entry of nuclear-armed and nuclear-powered ships from New Zealand ports (Lamare 1991:473). At the time New Zealand, along with Australia and the United States, was a member of the tripartite secu- rity alliance, ANZUS. The ANZUS Treaty had been signed in September 1951 as a form of insurance against the possibility of a resurgent Japan, an aggressive China, or any other form of regional instability that might threaten the interests of the allies (McKinnon 1986; Hayden 1996:434–454).
  • Effective Representation of Women Legislators in Parliaments

    Effective Representation of Women Legislators in Parliaments

    EFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN LEGISLATORS IN PARLIAMENTS: A CASE STUDY OF NEW ZEALAND IN THEORETICAL AND GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the University of Canterbury by Nomita Halder University of Canterbury New Zealand 2002 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE List of Tables VI List of Figures V11 List of Appendices V11 Abbreviations Vlll Acknowledgement IX Abstract X CHAPTER ONE: A QUEST FOR BARRIERS, POLITICAL 1 REPRESENTATION, EFFECTIVENESS AND POWER 1.1 Problems in levels ofwomen's representation 1 1.2 Regional variation of women's representation 4 1.3 Political Representation 8 1.3.1 Theories of representation 9 1.4 Political Effectiveness 20 1.5 Project profile 27 1.6 Research design/Methodology 31 1.7 Secondary sources 33 1.8 Structure of the thesis 34 CHAPTER TWO: BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION AND 36 EFFECTIVENESS AND SOURCES OF POWER 2.1 General societal barriers 36 2.1.1 Reproductive roles 36 2.1.2 Private versus public roles 38 2.1.2.1 Sources of stereotypes 40 2.1.2.1.1 Socialisation as a source of stereotypes 41 2.1.2.1.2 Popular attitudes 42 2.1.3 Cultural factors 46 2.1.4 Religious factors 47 2.2 Sources of power 52 o 111 2.2.1 Sources of individual power 55 2.2.l.1 Resource power 55 2.2.1.2 Position power 59 2.2.l.3 Expert power 59 2.2.l. 3.1 Education 62 2.2.1.3.2 Professional occupations and labour market 63 partici pation 2.2.1.4 Personal power 64 2.2.l.4.1 Family connections 66 2.2.2 Sources of group power 67 2.2.2.1 Quotas and reserved
  • Inquiry Into Public Funding of Organisations Associated with Donna Awatere Huata MP

    Inquiry Into Public Funding of Organisations Associated with Donna Awatere Huata MP

    Report of the Controller and Auditor-General Tumuaki o te Mana Arotake on Inquiry into Public Funding of Organisations Associated with Donna Awatere Huata MP November 2003 ISBN 0-478-18111-6 2 Contents Page Summary Report 4 1 Introduction 18 2 Organisations Associated with Mrs Awatere Huata 20 3 Public Administration Implications of Mrs Awatere Huata’s Involvement 26 4 Funding Provided by the Ministry of Education 49 5 Funding Provided by the Ministry of Maori Development: Te Puni Kokiri 73 6 Te Puni Kokiri – Case Studies 87 7 Funding Provided by the Community Employment Group of the Department of Labour 105 8 Funding Provided by Poutama Trust 127 9 Funding Provided by Trade New Zealand 133 Appendices 1 Terms of Reference for the Inquiry 141 2 Details of the Funding Arrangements 142 3 Summary Report In January 2003, Hon Richard Prebble MP, leader of the ACT New Zealand parliamentary party, asked the Controller and Auditor-General to inquire into certain allegations of financial impropriety involving one of his party’s list members, Donna Awatere Huata MP. The Background to Our Inquiry The allegations involved money owned by the Pipi Foundation Trust (“Pipi”), a private trust established by Mrs Awatere Huata in 1999 to deliver a children’s reading programme known as the Four Minute Reading Programme, which Mrs Awatere Huata had developed in the 1970s. The Auditor-General is not the auditor of private trusts. We therefore had no power to investigate the allegations of financial impropriety surrounding Pipi’s funds. Both the Police and the Serious Fraud Office have made inquiries into those matters.
  • Resourcing Parliament

    Resourcing Parliament

    A.2 (a) RESOURCING PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENTARY APPROPRIATIONS REVIEW REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE SECOND TRIENNIAL REVIEW November 2004 CONTENTS PART ONE: INTRODUCTION......................................................................1 1.1 Background ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope and Purpose of Review ............................................................ 2 1.3 The Parliamentary Environment and MMP............................................ 2 1.4 Principles for Resourcing Parliament ................................................... 3 1.5 Key Directions ................................................................................. 4 1.6 The Fiscal Context............................................................................ 5 1.7 Our Process..................................................................................... 5 PART TWO: DEVELOPMENTS FROM THE 2002 REVIEW .............................7 2.1 Commentary ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Actions Taken on 2002 Report ........................................................... 7 2.3 Our Assessment of Progress on the 2002 Report ................................ 12 PART THREE: RESOURCING PRIORITIES ................................................13 3.1 Commentary ................................................................................. 13 3.2 Expenditure Trends .......................................................................
  • Spring (October) 05

    Spring (October) 05

    NEWSLETTER OF THE AOTEAROA/NEW ZEALAND WOMEN AND POLITICS NETWORK Spring, 2005 New Series Issue No. 4 ISSN: 1175–1542 On the Campaign Trail: Candidates’ In planning for this edition of the Reflections on Election 2005 newsletter, it seemed an obvious choice Judith Collins (National) p 2 to focus on the 2005 general election. Heather Roy (Act) p 3 But I hadn’t counted on the campaign, Metiria Turei (Greens) p 3 election and coalition building being so exciting (is that the right word?) Neither Dianne Yates (Labour) p 4 had I counted on such an overwhelming response from candidates and Women and the 2005 General Election commentators to contribute their Jean Drage p 5 experience and ideas to the newsletter to produce this fascinating account of the The 2005 Gender Imbalance events, and expert analysis of the Claire Robinson and Amy Revell p 8 outcomes. I am, as always, grateful to those who have willingly given their time A Gendered Campaign? Media and expertise. I hope you, the reader, Coverage of the 2005 Election Heather Devere and Sharyn Graham p 9 enjoy the results! Women and the Election: Policies and Best wishes for the holiday season, and I look forward to bringing you further Perceptions Elizabeth McLeay and Margie Comrie p 11 editions in 2006. Conference report: Network for Janine Hayward European Women’s Rights [email protected] Rae Nicholl p 13 Political Studies University of Otago Book Review: My Life, David Lange Rae Nicholl p 15 On saying less than we know A common practice of political science journals, including even feminist political science journals such as the International Feminist Journal of Politics is to require referencing styles that obscure the gender (and in some cases the ethnicity) of authors.