Controlling Reaction Rate of Phase Transfer Hydrogenation

Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. oalbsae(ree agrsae)ratrcudps aeyise.Teeoe h infiac fOEEFs synthesis of organic significance for the reactions Therefore, quantity of bulk issues. thousands in safety when experimentally pose volts arises selectivity could of axis and reactor thousands reaction rates applying scales) the reaction Furthermore, larger along controlling even system. field on reaction (or electric the lab-scale the in a align oriented to to randomly how are of molecules question reactant techniques the scale, (STMBJ) techniques. bulk junction (MCBJ) a break junction axis, microscope break reaction con- controllable tunneling the (10 for cally along scanning strength OEEFs field using utilize field electric to by electric the order orient high addressed in to the met is is requirement be other One to the challenges selectivity. and major field rates two reaction are electric it. trolling there the support prospects, aligning promising to the by far Despite controlled so evidence be experimental may direct reactants. enantioselectivity no the reaction is of coordinate. the moment reaction dipole that the the along predicted along oriented field al. electric et external Wang This Diels-Alder an which promoted states. with OEEF axis” transition an reaction “reaction of scale. in addition stabilization molecule the al. single the et along the and Aragones at oriented barrier by reaction reaction is demonstrated lower experimentally field as a was electric employed to prediction simulated leading external be flow, an could electron when the OEEFs enhances accelerated chemistry. that theoretically electric shown in be external has catalysts can oriented evidence and by increasing reagents reactions and smart chemical questions, in interesting species scientifically reactive of (OEEFs). stabilization co-workers, fields the and and Shaik barriers chemistry. of energy in work challenge pioneering heating, and the include goal by reactions long-standing chemical a control is to selectivity ways and rate reaction also Controlling were enantioselectivity on field Introduction electric 1. external decomposition. of catalyst with Effects correlate lower changes reaction. to The the ascribed switching direction. of is by field course demonstrated and reversal was the voltage rate with over reaction increasing explored over potential with control aqueous/organic External electric correlated the interface. applied It the five across the at apparent. Initial transfer the species was mass reactive among constant. deactivation of enhanced dielectric performance concentration times with equilibrium greater best reaction consistent and longer the potential, water At exhibited electric in increasing 1-butanol boundary. solubility with and higher increased its important rates with found reaction consistent was solvents, boundary solvent alcohol well-defined of a homologous across effect investigated acetophenone of The hydrogenation transfer phase investigated. for were rate reaction and transfer mass controllable The Abstract 2020 12, June 1 field Wang electric Nan external low of of application hydrogenation by transfer acetophenone phase of rate reaction Controlling nvriyo Kansas of University 1 lnAllgeier Alan , 10,11 h nuneo EF pnceia ecinpromnehsrie ubrof number a raised has performance reaction chemical upon OEEFs of influence The 1 n arneWeatherley Laurence and , 16 un ta.as rvdti dab eetv aayi faDiel-Alder a of catalysis selective by idea this proved also al. et Huang 2 hl ti oetal infiatfraymti ytei,there synthesis, asymmetric for significant potentially is it While 10,12-15 7 o10 to 7-9 4 twspooe yMi tal. et Meir by proposed was It teto a undt h aiuaino activation of manipulation the to turned has attention trig sn solvents using stirring, 9 1 17,21,22 V/m). 17,18 eetees hncnutn xeiet on experiments conducting when Nevertheless, 1 tmlclrlvl hs hlegscnbe can challenges these level, molecular At 5 rcatalysts. or 8 htogncreactions organic that 17 16,19,20 6 oeimportantly, More eety inspired Recently, 1-3 Conventional rmechani- or 10 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. nteogncpaewt h ahd nteauospae h ovrino ctpeoe oa yield total acetophenone, placed analysis of is (GC) conversion chromatography chromatography anode The gas Gas the by 2.3 when phase. determined field aqueous were electric the (S)-1-phenylethanol the in of of analysis. cathode enantioselectivity direction the and the previously. as 1-phenylethanol, with described defined been of phase deionized electric have is organic negative field of work or the electric mL this the positive in 1.5 in of with orientations orientation in pressure detailed positive dissolved and The A fully temperature reaction. room was during at formate applied conducted were sodium field were electrodes of reactions titanium g The or 0.34 catalyst. steel study, 117 Stainless (PASCO experimental while supply agitation. single power water, without voltage a phases high In 1-hexanol, a two from 1-pentanol, the used. voltage) 1-butanol, across (DC were applied field acetophenone electric was external with SF-9585A) dis- An conjunction was (RuCl(p-cymene)[(S,S)-Ts-DPEN]) 1-octanol. in complex and used acetophenone/organic Ru 1-heptanol, solvents and the phase which organic aqueous in The dense phase re- more organic solved. the the dense elsewhere. of as found less diameter solution specially the be inner formate/water may as a The sodium solvents unit a experimental in ends. with the the studied up of on set Details was electrodes was mm. for 1-phenylethanol 20 ports about produce two is with to actor reactor acetophenone glass cylindrical of hollow hydrogenation made [?] transfer (Sigma-Aldrich, phase 1-octanol The procedure 98%), and (Sigma-Aldrich, apparatus 1-heptanol Experimental 2.2 99%), fur- Aesar, without RuCl(p- (Alfa (Sigma-Aldrich, used 99.0%), 1-hexanol 99%). and 1-pentanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 99%), suppliers 99.8%), formate reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, sodium [?] commercial 1-butanol 99%), from (Sigma-Aldrich), (Sigma-Aldrich, purchased cymene)[(S,S)-Ts-DPEN] were acetophenone work purification: this ther in used chemicals All Materials bulk 2.1 on catalysis and section synthesis Experimental of organic importance 2. in the orientation, possible field shows negative the electric work the show this external in general, of applied also scale. In when role results enantioselectivity. catalyst the the and the understanding conversion on comprehensively principles, reaction field fundamental lower electric in evincing external species resulting the While reactive of of enantioselectivity. in migration effects reaction rates fields. controllable decomposition on reaction the electric influence control support external its to further and fields results under simulation electric acetophenone and external of modeling hydrogenation of Mathematical ability transfer the phase demonstrated catalytic by have the reaction we reaction/catalysis interfacial contribution, the for this potential decelerating In field electric phases system. varying liquid liquid of biphasic presence a corresponding the in in the interface species the reactive in to of transferred constrained diffusion either as forces. interface. or be formate could organic-aqueous electrostatic reaction species the the sodium reactive system. the at charged with liquid the happening promote acetophenone applied, biphasic reaction to was of limited a field hydrogenation transfer electric in external mass transfer studied an a phase was is the acetophenone field source electric of that hydrogen external hydrogenation showed with selectivity transfer studies even catalytic and Previous rate orientation scales, reaction the controlling bulk flipping of on simply possibilities by the inhibited explore or further species To promoted reactive either field. of be electric diffusion can external the rate control the simple reaction to of a the is that input, fields study energy electric system, previous huge external reaction with by barrier rates the reaction reaction in the the lowering manipulate from to way apart However, understudied. remains μ faeohnn a ie ih15m fogncslett isle006 Ru g 0.0064 dissolve to solvent organic of mL 1.5 with mixed was acetophenone of L 23 25 n le h oa ocnrto freactants. of concentration local the alter and hsrie h osblt fmnpltn h ecinrtsb otoln the controlling by rates reaction the manipulating of possibility the raises This 25 2 24 hshsbe aiae nour in validated been has This 25 rey h ihscsystem biphasic the Briefly, 25,26 When 25 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. emi o nldddet h atta h xeiet eecnutdi uecn hydrodynamic quiescent a in conducted were experiments the that fact J the convection The to force. due electrostatic by included environment. migration not and difference is concentration term by diffusion the describing (1), h lcrcfil ntedmi sdsrbdb h oso ieeta equation differential Poisson the by necessary. described if • is ∇ coefficient domain diffusion the mutual in the field estimate electric to The applied was equation Wilke-Chang The (V). constant, Faraday the where was study, present the in electromigration as to referred equation. species, Nernst-Plank reactive the charged on based the modeled of and transport times metal three The simulation Precious scanned and were modeling analysis. samples Theoretical for All prior 3. analysis. These dried setup. during and workstation electrode. employed reaction the was stainless-steel with after of collimator analyzed interface targeted products used was a degradation the detector with the from drift in mode collected silicon contents were and metal anode samples the Ru solid of with determination Professional) Delta fast (Olympus, for analyzer XRF on All handheld acquired A probe. were Spain). analysis observe spectra Compostela, (XRF) X-channel De re- florescence NMR cooled (Santiago X-ray cryogenically All potential software 2.5 a NJ). electric NMR with MestreNova Vineland, of using equipped Lab-Glass, V analyzed spectrometer 500 (Wilmad was 15 AVIII solvent. data tube negative Bruker as NMR MHz and 1-butanol mm 500 positive and a 5 under electrodes RuCl(p- a titanium reactions 117 of into with and from pipetted mg 1-butanol h collected mL 5.8 24 were 1.5 after dissolving of 4 spectively by mixture and a prepared 3 in was RuCl(p-cymene)[(S,S)-Ts-DPEN] Samples 1 of mg Sample 6.4 analysis. ing NMR 500 for in prepared cymene)[(S,S)-Ts-DPEN] were samples analysis Four spectroscopy (NMR) Resonance mL/min), Magnetic (3 a Nuclear gas with 2.4 carrier as equipped 250 helium chromatograph temperature conditions: detector following gas and the 6890N inlet under enantioselectivity Agilent determine An and products (25m analysis. column chromatography CB gas CP-Chirasil-Dex for methanol with 10 -eao,1hpao,ad1otnla rai ovnswr netgtddet hi blt omiti a maintain 1-pentanol, to 1-butanol, ability their namely to alcohols, due primary investigated were Five first solvents were organic applied. reactant as is performance, 1-octanol acetophenone field reaction and the the electric 1-heptanol, affect with 1-hexanol, external significantly conjunction could an properties in when chemical used and especially solvents physical different organic their different as studied the of effects The effects Solvent interface 4.1 the at discussion was formate and and Simulation no Results catalyst assuming fields. Ru 4. system, 5.4. electric of reaction external profiles Multiphysics proposed various Concentration the COMSOL under interface. in calculated in the species were at/across reactive method of flux element transfer nor mass reaction finite the using understand to solved conducted were equations The density. charge space electric where i = μ ( flqi ape rmteogncpaewr ihrw fe ahrato n iue o15mL 1.5 to diluted and reaction each after withdrawn were phase organic the from samples liquid of L ε − 0 D ε D ε 0 r i i ∇ stedffso offiin (m coefficient diffusion the is ∇ stedeeti osato h respace, free the of constant dielectric the is )= Φ) c i − D − RT i ρ z i v F (2) c R i ∇ stegsconstant, gas the is Φ(1) μ fMO-4(abig stps.Sml a bandb dissolv- by obtained was 2 Sample Isotopes). (Cambridge MeOH-d4 of L × ° .5m)adaflm oiaindtco a sdt dniyreaction identify to used was detector ionization flame a and mm) 0.25 ,oe eprtr 115 temperature oven C, 2 /s), c i T steincnetain(mol/m concentration ion the is 27-29 steaslt eprtr K,and (K), temperature absolute the is h oa u fspecies of flux molar The 3 ε ρ sterltv emtiiyo materials, of permittivity relative the is ° C. 3 i ), μ , fec iudsml were sample liquid each of L J z i 30 i stevlnenumber, valence the is sepesdi Equation in expressed is , : Φ steeeti potential electric the is μ acetophenone. L ρ v 30 sthe is F is Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. -etnl–014–11.75 13.03 – – 0.164 0.59 – – (25 1-heptanol water in Solubility 41 1-hexanol 36 (ns/cm) 1-pentanol conductivity Electrical 1-butanol study.Solvent solvents. present the organic in studied conductivity the and of moment Properties dipole to 1. Table performance be reaction might in investigation conductivity differences previous electrical the our attribute and to to moment Ru according dipole neutral reactions the coworkers, promoted the While electrostatically of rate. in dissociation important production the (species the promote complex increasing further ion, dielectric protons are ultimately Ru could generate chloride largest alcohols cationic and protons these the the the polarize hand, These With removing to into other potential field. (RuCl(p-cymene)[(S-S)-Ts-DPEN]) dissociation. the greatest by electric On compound the reaction protons external has and solvent). 1-butanol generate an conversion as solvents, to under highest 1-octanol studied ability the with the the in that among constant possess resulting than which most interface, faster promotes solvents, the fold initially protic water. 2 at which water, in reactants than in solubilities (more the solubility respective rate between highest their the interaction be has the may 1-butanol solvents, of performance other different the electrodes. significantly to stainless-steel the Compared and for solvents reason organic possible external different positive One with of 15V h under 24 (mol%) for yields 1-phenelethanol field and electric (mol%) conversion Acetophenone 1. Figure DC positive of of the V of hydrogenation 15 increase can under transfer the solvents. we reaction with the alcohol gradually of As homologous decreased No promoting h these yield 24 hydrogenation. on and of after conversion transfer solvents. weight performance 76.8% The molecular phase five of best electrodes. yield of the stainless-steel the and with concept the of 84.7% voltage in the confirms of properties resulted conversion and which chemical with 1-butanol reactions, source acetophenone and the hydrogen of after physical as addition analysis formate the see, GC sodium lists by of 1 detected conversion role total were Table showing by-products 1, aldehyde Figure yields. in corresponding presented product are results and experimental The values system. reaction biphasic stable 2 h ieecso hs rprisbtentefieslet r ml.Acrigy ti difficult is it Accordingly, small. are solvents five the between properties these of differences the 34,35 34,35 31,32 hrfr ceeaigadpooigtegnrto ftectlssand catalysts the of generation the promoting and accelerating therefore .41715.13 17.84 1.7 1.66 2.14 7.3 4 ° C/mass%) 33 Dipole(D) 2 25 nShm )by 1) Scheme in n hi and Shaik and 33 ilcrccntn (20 constant Dielectric

a °

ilcrccntn (20 constant Dielectric °

C) 33 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. aino h nd lcrd imre nteogncpae eeosre.Adtoal,gsbubbles gas Additionally, degra- observed. with were along phase) system organic reaction the the in in flow (immersed current electrode induced anode field Concentration electric the external (a) of an dation fields. catalyst. hand, Ru electric other of various the profile under On concentration interface (b) the ions, at formate profiles of concentration profile Simulated 3. Figure lower the to times. leading reaction applied, longer is for force potential electrostatic electric greater elevated an a at when observed greater as is rate inhibition reaction This rates. reaction 6 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 02 i1600 6694.5 94.5 94.5 93.3 26.6 93.4 60.1 93.5 94.3 94.6 67.4 32.6 94.3 55.5 94.5 76.8 47.1 49.8 63.9 0.09 67.5 0.085 0.085 4.4 4.3 1.6 3.5 0.1 ˜0 0.5 0.02 0.2 0.09 2.6 Ti 1.7 Ti 1.2 N/A 0.2 Ti 0.2 SS 0.2 SS SS Ti – 24 Ti 15-20h + 24 50-4h Ti 15-20h + 24 30-4h 15-20h + 15-16h 50-4h (%) + 24 ee 30-8h 15-20h + 30-4h 24 (%) 15-16h Yield + 30-8h 24 9 w/w) 24 (% 50 loss 8 Weight 30 7 (mA) Current 15 6 Electrode 50 5 30 4 15 3 (h) 0 Time 2 1 two 0 (V) these Voltage In fields. h. electric external Case 20 positive applied for various the applied under switching for case V experiments simply applied In for by 15 V Summary controlled by 50 5). reaction. externally or 2. followed (Case the to be Table V respectively h of reached could 30 course 24 h yield reaction solely the for reaction the 4 with over that the applied those for potential suggest to and V applied electric results comparing h, 30 reacting were These when 16 after solely V increased h. for 7, with in 1-phenylethanol 50 24 case V that shown of or In 15 yields to data V to the 9. compared the 30 switched cases, and 7.4% 2, was 8, 9, of Table potential 7, and increase to electric Cases 8 an reference the labelled is experiments, V, With elec- which these 30 applied 67.5%, of reaction. under the results h the when the 8 of performance list for reactive course reaction rows of the the three investigate over last migration to the varied controllable conducted was the was potential to experiments trical due of set likely further most A is decomposition. deactivation catalyst the spite than achieved. that in rather was Furthermore, evidence species enantioselectivity reaction rates. ((S)-1-phenylethanol) the further reaction for product is controlling reason constant in main This a the field deactivation, being electric electrode reaction as external apparent actual force of of the electrostatic importance controllable under that the the ions suggesting suggests and alkoxide strongly deactivation thus This and performance, catalyst stainless reaction increased. Ru with in experiments than of electrode was changes observed For migration in of potential less as role evidence electric trend minimal is 3). negligible a same applied plays and was electrodes the degradation the there 2, showed titanium when Although performance 1, of electrodes, observed. reaction (Cases steel rate was electrodes, electrodes slurry degradation titanium 5, black steel of average 4, apparent stainless degradation the Cases no electric with and as applied, high those w/w, recorded of potential 0.1% to are effects electric results compared inhibiting different the 2, the and Table with clarify employed, in were and 6 electrodes degradation and titanium electrode the stable of of chemically effects coverage potential, conversion. negative blocking and higher the interface. rate a the eliminate could reaction to at To interface lower leading catalyst the a observed, the to was achieving at transfer degradation finally formed mass higher observed and At products inhibiting a interface be by degradation potential, would reaction The anode. galvanic electric flows the higher of with the current phase. At deceleration higher consistent liquid at the degradation, the is to electrode occurring contribute the of greater electrode corrosion also from conductivity to the the released leading increased of ions expected, with to be decomposition metal due cathode would more The the effects With under corrosion at reactions 3). galvanic degradation. For observed produced stronger and were potentials, Ru. is 2, electrode electric of analysis hydrogen the 1, higher amount The of which a small (Cases rates formed in a 2 analysis. degradation which with Table corrosion, XRF greater Cr products in and by and degradation flows shown characterized Ni, The current as were Fe, higher confirmed of interface 2). potentials, was mainly Table liquid-liquid electric electrode consisted in higher the slurry the 3 at the of and slurry that degradation 2 showed black The 1, of Cases layer cathode. (see thin the measurement on loss weight generated by were composition unknown of 7 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. astase n ecinrtsb xenleeti ed,i codwt atfidns h il f1- of yield The findings. larger past controllable a as with of electric unexpected accord hypothesis was the in which the when strength, fields, inhibited field confirms electric electric was negative further external reaction increased which by the the being with cases, rates orientation, increased as these reaction negative phenylethanol proposed In and the was transfer 3. in OEEF Table mass reaction applied of in the to presented orientation was applied are then the potential was results Since field electric The external electric orientation. reversed system. to a selectivity, positive respect reaction with the controlling constant for in important remained (S)-1-phenylethanol applied of potential enantioselectivity the field 2, Table in shown enantioselectivity As product and polarity field Electric 4.4 = r When[CO expression: Rate Overall:HCOO CO ACPH ACPH + ACP2 + of 3 fields. Both electric HCOO involving region. external + reactions interface interfacial of of 2 the influence kinetics at on the fields alkoxide electric under the of ions. electromigration impact and reactive important the catalyst an by suggest Ru observations affected of These (9)). were concentration al. (Equation concentrations the substrate et by Wu these and by catalyst limited of study were concentration the rates the with over consistent kinetics is order second This a CO as of simplified concentration further the reaction, the during [ prior and equilibrated phenylethanol and reversible are decarboxylation and constants. formate Equations of in transfer, coordination summarized hydrogen the are to mechanism that proposed assuming the (9), with - consistent (3) expression formate rate aqueous and with stoichiometry acetophenone The catalyst. of Ru-TsDPEN hydrogenation transfer and phase source the hydrogen for as mechanism Proposed 1. Scheme external-electric-field reaction-rate-of-phase-transfer-hydrogenation-of-acetophenone-by-application-of-low- image5.emf file product, Hosted the water. form by to bonding water hydrogen from CO of proton with stabilization a the up to picks alkoxide due the intermediate alkoxide corresponding NH the the of on proton the with concertedly, substrate the proposed to is hydrogen field electric to external species transferred complex formation, an the Ru under Following with cationic catalyst acetophenone 1-butanol. The Ru-TsDPEN of hydrogenation 1. and transfer Scheme source phase in hydrogen the as for mechanism formate stepwise aqueous a observations, the on Based mechanism Proposed 4.3 2 OH + − 2 + 2 ACP ofr iabnt sosre norpeiu study. previous our in observed as bicarbonate form to ] − − H HCO CO + 3 2 2 − K O vial at available and rmafraet eeaecatalyst generate to formate a from 1 1 C + ACP + [HCOO − 3 − Ru ACPH (6) 26 E P − 2 ersnstettlcnetaino aayt sCO As catalyst. of concentration total the represents ] where (3) (4) − OH + K - ], 2 [CO 1 ersn ctpeoeadiscrepnigakxd,wie1- while alkoxide, corresponding its and acetophenone represent r k oeyretained, moiety K H 1 [ = 2 Ru 2 1 + ] − https://authorea.com/users/332910/articles/459244-controlling- O steeulbimcntn,and constant, equilibrium the is ][ (5) k ACP → 1 K [ Ru 1 31 1 [HCOO ][HCOO 2 − nytehdieo uHi catalyst in Ru-H on hydride the only ][ ACP sgnrtdb eoa fclrd fe compound after chloride of removal by generated is E P 2 − 2 37 ] − nege lcrmgaint h nefc hr yrd is hydride a where interface the to electromigration undergoes 26 (9) ] sepce ob ml,teeoetert xrsincnbe can expression rate the therefore small, be to expected is HCO + ] (8) eutn ntergnrto fspecies of regeneration the in resulting n ihteaoeosrainsoigta h reaction the that showing observation above the with and 3 ihterlaeo CO of release the with , 8 3 − (7) 37 n h eeae yrxd ute reacts further hydroxide generated the and 25 k 1 , k 2 , k 3 2 3 r h epcierato rate reaction respective the are 2 . 26 staserdt acetophenone to transferred is ail ecswt hydroxide with reacts rapidly nta ftasern both transferring of Instead 2 n h formation the and PE 1 isle in dissolves eest 1- to refers 37 Finally, Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ecin.Smls1(pcrmA n setu )wr bandb isligteR aayt in catalysts Ru the dissolving by after obtained and were before catalysts B) the (spectrum of 2 structures and the decomposition. A) catalyst of the identification (spectrum to the CD 1 the attributed for to likely Samples analysis due more NMR not are reactions. the but probably showed selectivity are 5 reaction enantioselectivity enan- control Figure (S)-1-phenylethanol the to decreased in potential, OEEF changes electric of these inhibiting fields. ability However, the electric of observed. external increase were negative the various tioselectivities with under hand, time other the reaction On different at flow Current 4. Figure applied. fields in compete electric Increase would external reaction. negative which the system. various promote heating, reaction with possibly joule experiments the and to for in force Summary due 4) electrostatic 3. increase negative (Figure Table higher temperature flow of current local effects the the inhibiting on with the increase This with consistent increase conversion. significant is and rate the flow reaction current to lower a due in result likely to is expected be would force electrostatic inhibiting h ecinrna eaie1 o 4h hwdn inl o h uctls.I ean nnw fthe if unknown remains investigation It further and catalyst. field, Ru electric the external for from negative 4, signals the of sample no by difficulty for showed caused and spectra h, required. was concentration NMR 24 is catalyst initial the from for However, Ru low collected V the the seen. C), of 15 to be negative decomposition (due (spectra can at catalyst signals 3 Ru run small sample the reaction h, For for the 24 spectra) for ppm. NMR V 1H 6.79 15 in and detection positive 6.57 at run approximately reaction at the present clearly are catalyst 3 Dadrato itr 1btnladaeohnn itr)rsetvl,adpasfo h Ru the from peaks and respectively, mixture) acetophenone and (1-butanol mixture reaction and OD 3 42 i–4. 75.2 82.9 66.1 86.0 48.4 91.0 45.6 94.6 23.0 22.4 16.9 49.8 – – – – N/A – Ti Ti Ti Ti 24 Ti – 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 (%) EE 24 -30 0 (%) Yield -20 (mA) Current -15 Electrode -10 (h) -5 Time 0 (V) Voltage (V) Voltage 9 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. astase n ieisi ihsclqi ytm sdfrogncsnhssaditrailctlsson catalysis interfacial and on synthesis fields the organic electric in for external Acknowledgements consumption used of systems energy influence liquid the minimal biphasic understanding phase with in for two macroscale. engineering important kinetics in also and green conducted is transfer for reactions It mass organic opportunity of system. an synthesis reaction NMR raises controllable proposed the for and from scope systems implied the liquid as extends enantioselectivity, work neg- reduced this of possible for Overall, influence to reason the due main by V the decomposition 50 negative Catalyst as to analysis. current. concluded V of was monotonic 5 increase enan- A voltages negative the and from ative orientation. conversion from negative increased reaction resulted voltage the both increase as in as was temperature observed important was field be conversion electric to in the proved increase ions. when was reactive reduced field involving significantly electric reactions were applied in tioselectivity based in fields the proposed electric differences of were external direction expression the rate of The for reaction observed importance and were reason the the mechanism changes suggesting main A on significant observations, the values. the fields no voltage on as and electric positive measured, suggested the external were in was not variation values different during interface with did excess intermediate of the Enantiomeric electrodes alkoxide influence at stainless-steel performance. the The reaction the species of of reactive migration reaction. corrosion of and hydrogenation electrolytic concentrations formation the the from possible impact concentration equilibrium products and significantly lower degradation interface to due The the value performance this in at reaction. beyond reduction Increases of catalyst significant V. showed values positive15 Ru V low of 50 of voltage at and optimum shown V an were with 30 potential improvements species volts, positive Significant electric reactive zero to of of applied results. control transfer a simulation of to mass by relative influence controllable voltage supported the The was and fields electric experimentally acetophenone. electric evaluated by external of was voltage hydrogenation performance low transfer reaction by on catalytic times. rates 24 reaction the minor by controllable for the expanded experimentally highlight fields To were demonstrated (D). D work 4 and reported and C The (C) spectra 3 and (B), 2 times, (A), Conclusion 8 1 by samples 5. vertically of expanded spectra was NMR B 1H spectra 1D of species, plot Stack 5. Figure 10 Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. Adv. 17. ture. 16. field. electric under solutions aqueous glycolaldehyde 15. methanol. liquid from synthesis formaldehyde 14. perspective. a catalysis: 13. innocent? linkers gold–thiolate are fields: electric 12. fields. electric external 11. Chem. 10. reagents. iron-oxo nonheme of reactivity activation 9. selectivity. endo/exo 8. activations. 7. selectivity. reaction control to particles 6. naphthalene. of sulfonation dioxide. carbon in control ratio 5. isomeric to application selectivity.1993;49(28):6229-6234. and reactions. rate competitive reaction of control 4. the for opportunity excellent an Technol. systems: two-phase in moment. dipole 3. molecular the of importance 13359. reactions: Diels–Alder in lectivity 2. molecules. functionalized single R. in chemistry Zachary bond-selective and analysis NMR 1. authors the The in assistance Kansas. his analysis. of XRF for University References the Douglas the in T. from assistance Justin Endowment his acknowledge Learned for Day to Albert like the would by also supported was work The erR hnH a ,SakS retdeeti ed ceeaeDesAdrratosadcnrlthe control and reactions Diels–Alder accelerate fields electric Oriented S. Shaik W, Lai H, Chen R, Meir hi ,d isrS,KmrD xenleeti edwl oto h eetvt fezmtclk bond enzymatic-like of selectivity the control will field electric External D. Kumar SP, Visser de S, Shaik rosyV,Koao Y ersB acltC ice–rpc ytei narteimcatalyst ruthenium a on synthesis Fischer–Tropsch C. Lancelot B, Legras AY, Khodakov VV, Ordomsky e ,MrlsR lie A ar .Snhsso eeoeeu aayt ihwl hpdplatinum shaped well with catalysts heterogeneous of Synthesis F. Zaera MA, Albiter R, Morales I, Lee agZ aoihD aaa ,SakS retdEtra lcrcfilscet boueenantiose- absolute create fields electric Oriented-External S. Shaik R, Ramanan D, Danovich Z, Wang ukM,Fn ,GosM,TmsW smercctltchdoeainratosi supercritical in reactions hydrogenation catalytic Asymmetric W. Tumas MF, Gross S, Feng MJ, Burk ia ,Ce ,Craa A agY hi .Eeto xenleeti ed nteCHbond C-H the on fields electric external of Effect S. Shaik Y, Wang MA, Carvajal H, Chen H, Hirao teg ,GnnK almn .Mcoaehaiga e a oidc eetvt between selectivity induce to way new a as heating Microwave M. Lallemant K, Gonon D, Stuerga in ,Ha ,Fbi ,BznG,H .Sboeua oto,setocp n mgn of imaging and spectroscopy control, Submolecular W. Ho GC, Bazan L, Fabris Q, Huan Y, Jiang un ,Tn ,L ,e l lcrcfil–nue eetv aayi fsnl-oeuereaction. single-molecule of catalysis selective field–induced Electric al. et J, Li C, Tang X, Huang aaa ,Dnvc ,Mna ,SakS aayi fmty rnfrratosb retdexternal oriented by reactions transfer methyl of Catalysis S. Shaik D, Mandal D, Danovich R, Ramanan hi ,RmnnR aoihD adlD tutr n eciiyslciiycnrlb oriented- by control reactivity/selectivity and Structure D. Mandal D, Danovich R, Ramanan S, Shaik 2019;5(6):eaaw3072. 2016;531(7592):88-91. hi ,Mna ,RmnnR retdeeti ed sftr mr egnsi chemistry. in reagents smart future as fields electric Oriented R. Ramanan D, Mandal S, Shaik rgne C aot L aws ,e l lcrsai aayi faDesAdrreaction. Diels–Alder a of catalysis Electrostatic al. et N, Darwish NL, Haworth Aragonès AC, asn ,Soe ,Soe E ituc ,Sit M aj .Snhsso d-rtrs from (d)-erythrose of Synthesis F. Saija AM, Saitta F, Pietrucci JE, Sponer J, Sponer G, Cassone h ,Ga T aS rs ,SotS,MEe -.Euiaigterlso lcrcfilsin fields electric of roles the Elucidating J-S. McEwen SL, Scott N, Kruse S, Ha JT, Gray F, Che asn ,PerciF aj ,GytF ataA.Oese lcrcfil rvnmtaeand methane driven electric-field One-step AM. Saitta F, Guyot F, Saija F, Pietrucci G, Cassone 2016;8(12):1091-1098. 2014;4(9):2896-2899. JACS. JACS. 2004;126(37):11746-11749. ChemPhysChem. hmScRev. Soc Chem 1995;117(31):8277-8278. C Catal. ACS 2018;8(6):5153-5174. 2010;11(1):301-310. 2018;47(14):5125-5145. PNAS. hmSci. Chem 2008;105(40):15241-15246. JACS. JACS. 11 hmCommun. Chem 2018;140(12):4354-4362. 2017;8(3):2329-2336. 2008;130(11):3319-3327. a Chem. Nat 2018;54(26):3211-3214. 2013;5(1):36-41. JACS. 2018;140(41):13350- Tetrahedron. aa Sci Catal Na- Nat Sci Posted on Authorea 12 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.159198698.89254810 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. yrgnto fKetones. of Hydrogenation 37. 36. K. 333 to 273 from K. 333 to 35. K 273 from 1-alcohols of conductivity 34. 33. hydrogenation. transfer 32. chiral with ketones catalysts. of ruthenium(II) hydrogenation asymmetric network: hydrogenation 31. reactor. spray electrostatic an in hydrolysis 30. process. electrodialysis during desalination water 29. modeling. mathematical - 28. simulation. 27. water. in genation field. electric external 26. low under acetophenone of hydrogenation transfer 25. Phys. Chem 24. Phys. 23. junctions. single-molecule organometallic in tion 22. individual in interference 21. conformation. molecular on conductance junction 20. Science. 19. study. dynamics molecular initio 18. rsnaR ase AC rzm C a e atHJ eadN ehnclycnrle quantum controlled Mechanically N. Renaud HSJ, Zant der van FC, Grozema VAEC, Janssen R, Frisenda rg ,Cbz ,Cral ,Faj F Jime CF, Franjo E, Carballo O, Cabeza M, Prego uB a J esrmn fsnl-oeuerssac yrpae omto fmlclrjunctions. molecular of formation repeated by resistance single-molecule of Measurement NJ. Tao B, Xu ektrmnL lr E uklsC yete S tiewl L eedneo single-molecule of Dependence ML. Steigerwald MS, Hybertsen C, Nuckolls JE, Klare L, Venkataraman mlwo M adoko rai ovn rpris odnAod 1996. London:Amold, properties. solvent organic of Handbook IM. Smallwood 2019. Press, CRC edition). (100th physics and chemistry of handbook CRC JR. Rumble rg ,Rl ,Cral ,Faj ,Jmee ,Cbz .Eetia odciiydt falkanols of data conductivity Electrical O. Cabeza Jiménez E, C, Franjo E, Carballo E, Rilo M, Prego asn ,Sfi ,RnliG pnrJ aaytfe yrgnsnhssfo iudehnl nab an ethanol: liquid from synthesis hydrogen Catalyst-free J. Sponer G, Rinaldi A, Sofia G, Cassone agN aisiK eeaJ lgirA,Wahre R lcrsaial nacdctltcphase catalytic enhanced Electrostatically LR. Weatherley AM, Allgeier J, Petera K, Kaminski N, Wang irM auisiO,Mse A ail A lcrpoei:mteaia oeigadcomputer and modeling mathematical Electrophoresis: DA. Saville RA, Mosher OA, Palusinski M, Bier eieM,CbzsH irM rnpr fsltsars qeu hs nefcsb electropgoresis by interfaces phase aqueous across solutes of Transport M. Bier H, Cabezas ML, Levine cwr ,Kslne ,Lse ,e l il-nue odcac wthn ycag-tt alterna- charge-state by switching conductance Field-induced al. et F, Lissel G, Kastlunger F, Schwarz alv ,Mie J nesadn h oeo ae nAuosRteimCtlzdTransfer Ruthenium-Catalyzed Aqueous in Water of Role the Understanding EJ. Meijer A, Pavlova ehuhS,ToiY omncto:cnrlo hmclratosuigeeti edgradients. field electric using reactions chemical of control Communication: Y. Tsori SD, Deshmukh uX i ,D oms ,e l utltrlmcaitcsuyit smerctase hydro- transfer asymmetric into study mechanistic multilateral A al. et D, Tommaso Di J, Liu X, Wu alv ,R A, Pavlova eeaJ etelyL,Roe ,Kmnk .Afiieeeetmdlo nyaial catalyzed enzymatically of model element finite A K. Kaminski D, Rooney LR, Weatherley J, Petera h T agB a J uY.Intase oeigbsdo entPac hoyfrsaline for theory Nernst-Planck on based modeling transfer Ion YQ. Wu CJ, Gao B, Yang HT, Zhu ahy .Eeto netra lcrcfil ntert fdffso-otoldreactions. diffusion-controlled of rate the on field electric external an of Effect M. Tachiya huaT tuiN stuiK uaaK advlC ooiR h hydrogenation/transfer The R. Noyori C, Sandoval K, Murata K, Tsutsumi N, Utsumi T, Ohkuma 1987;87(8):4622-4626. 2003;301:1221-1223. Science. 2016;144(19):191102. se ,Mie J ehnsi set fuigfraea yrgndnri aqueous in donor hydrogen a as formate using of aspects Mechanistic EJ. Meijer E, ¨ osler hmErJ. Eur Chem o Liq. Mol J 1983;219(4590):1281-1287. C Catal. ACS JACS. Chromatogr. J π- ChemPhysChem. tce dimers. stacked 2003;102(1):83-91. 2006;128(27):8724-8725. 2008;14(25):7699-7715. hsCe C. Chem Phys J 2016;6(8):5350-5358. 1992;607(1):113-118. a Chem. Nat optCe Eng. Chem Comput 2012;13(15):3492-3496. o Liq. Mol J a Nanotechnol. Nat saPcJCe Eng. Chem J Asia-Pac Nature. 2019;123(14):9202-9208. ´ 12 e .Maueetaditrrtto fteelectrical the of interpretation and Measurement E. nez 2016;8(12):1099-1104. 2006;442(7105):904-907. 2000;89(1):233-238. 2009;33(1):144-161. 2016;11(2):170-176. hmEgJ. Eng Chem 2020;15(2):11. η 6-arene/n-tosylethylenediamine- 2019;374:1096-1101. Chem J J