DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation & Circulation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Richmond General Plan Update Issues & Opportunities Paper 8: Transportation & Circulation DRAFT Prepared for Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. In May 2006 by Fehr & Peers City of Richmond General Plan Update CONTENTS 8.1 REGULATORY AGENCIES________________________________________ 3 8.1.1 Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) _________________ 3 8.1.2 West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee _________ 3 8.1.3 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)_________________5 8.2 ROADWAY SYSTEM_____________________________________________ 5 8.2.1 Street Classifications _________________________________________5 8.2.2 Existing Freeway Operations _________________________________ 12 8.2.3 Existing Volumes ____________________________________________ 13 8.2.4 Existing Intersection Operations ______________________________ 14 8.2.5 Planned Improvements ______________________________________23 8.3 TRANSIT ______________________________________________________ 24 8.4 FREIGHT MOVEMENT___________________________________________31 8.5 WATER FACILITIES_____________________________________________31 8.6 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES _________________________ 32 2 DRAFT Issues & Opportunities: Transportation & Circulation 8 TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION 8.1 REGULATORY AGENCIES Several regional agencies govern transportation planning in the Richmond area. The following gives a brief overview of the agencies. 8.1.1 Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) The CCTA is the County agency established to implement Measure C passed by voters in 1998 and its extension, Measure J, passed in 2004. These measures increased sales tax by one-half percent to fund a list of specific transportation improvement projects in Contra Costa County. Measure C also required the development of a Growth Management Program (GMP) to help control the spread of congestion. The CCTA board includes elected officials from the 18 cities within the County and the County itself. CCTA is responsible for preparing and updating the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CCTP), which lays out the transportation vision and specific improvement projects for the county. The CCTA includes several Regional Transportation Planning Committees that cover specific sub-areas of the County. Richmond and West Contra Costa County are within the West Contra Costa County Transportation Advisory Committee’s (WCCTAC) purview. The WCCTAC prepares a regional Action Plan (see below) that was last updated in July 2000. The CCTA also prepared the state-mandated Congestion Management Plan. 8.1.2 West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee The WCCTAC, under a joint powers agreement, is composed of elected officials from six member jurisdictions: El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond (three members), San Pablo, and Contra Costa County. The WCCTAC also includes members from three of the area’s transit providers: Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit), Western Contra Costa County Transit Authority (WestCAT), and Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART). The WCCTAC prepared the West Contra Costa Action Plan 2000 Update, a revision to the West County Action Plan that was adopted in 1994. These Plans assess transportation issues within West Contra Costa County and outline a recommended package of goals, objectives and actions for addressing those issues. The Action Plan DRAFT 3 City of Richmond General Plan Update feeds into the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Congestion Management Plan). The latest CMP update was adopted by the CCTA in 2005. Table 8.1: Routes of Regional Significance and Associated TSOs Route of Regional Traffic Service Objective Significance • Increase HOV lane usage by 10% • 10% increase in transit ridership I-80 • Maintain LOS "E" on all segments • 2,000 daily ridership on Capitol and San Joaquin Corridor trains • Complete the I-80 Bikeway Corridor between the El Cerrito del Norte BART station & Hercules • Achieve a drive alone rate no greater than 75% I-580 • 5% increase in transit ridership • Achieve LOS "E" or better on all segments • Establish direct or indirect bicycle access over the Richmond – San Rafael Bridge • 5% increase in transit ridership for bus lines that serve regionally significant arterials 23rd Street • Maintain LOS "D" or better on all segments of regionally significant arterials • Provide a bikeway network along regionally significant arterials 5% increase in transit ridership for bus lines that serve regionally significant arterials Carlson • Boulevard • Maintain LOS "D" or better on all segments of regionally significant arterials • Provide a bikeway network along regionally significant arterials 5% increase in transit ridership for bus lines that serve regionally significant arterials Cutting • Boulevard • Maintain LOS "D" or better on all segments of regionally significant arterials • Provide a bikeway network along regionally significant arterials • 5% increase in transit ridership for bus lines that serve regionally significant arterials El Portal Drive • Maintain LOS "D" or better on all segments of regionally significant arterials • Provide a bikeway network along regionally significant arterials 5% increase in transit ridership for bus lines that serve regionally significant arterials San Pablo • Avenue • Maintain LOS "D" or better on all segments of regionally significant arterials • Provide a bikeway network along regionally significant arterials • Achieve a drive alone rate of no more than 75% • Increase average ridership as much as possible with initial goal of achieving a 10% increase to 3,000 average weekday daily riders San Pablo Dam • The ratio of peak hour travel time to off-peak travel time (delay index) should be no greater than Road 2.0 • The maximum wait time for drivers on side streets wishing to access San Pablo Dam Road should be no greater than one signal cycle length • Provide facilities to improve pedestrian and bicycle access with related safety enhancements along San Pablo Dam Road 5% increase in transit ridership for bus lines that serve regionally significant arterials Richmond • Parkway • Maintain LOS "D" or better on all segments of regionally significant arterials • Identify and apply for funding for bikeways on or near the Richmond Parkways In addition to laying out planned future transportation improvement projects, the Action Plan designates Routes of Regional Significance and sets Traffic Service Objectives (TSOs). The Action Plan sets TSOs (Table 8.1 lists the TSOs for the facilities in the Transportation Analysis Study Area, plus the freeways serving the Planning Area) for the Routes of Regional Significance based on travel speeds and delay indices, and the Traffic Service Objective Monitoring Report monitors the operating conditions on a four to five year basis. Travel speeds are taken directly from field measurements, and delay indices 4 DRAFT Issues & Opportunities: Transportation & Circulation are computed as the ratio between point-to-point travel time under free-flow conditions versus congested (i.e., peak period) conditions. The TSO Monitoring Report provides the most up-to-date results for the TSOs outlined in the Action Plan. 8.1.3 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) The MTC is the Bay Area’s regional transportation planning agency and is responsible for the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a comprehensive blueprint for the development of mass transit, highway, airport, seaport, railroad, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. The RTP is a 20-year plan and is updated every two years. The Commission also screens requests from local agencies for state and federal grants for transportation projects to determine compatibility with the RTP. MTC is the federally-designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Bay Area. In recent years, state and federal laws have given MTC an increasingly important role in financing Bay Area transportation improvements. Most significant was the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), which increased the powers of MPOs like MTC to determine the mix of transportation projects best suited to meet their region’s needs. MTC also administers state monies, including those provided by the Transportation Development Act. Legislation passed in 1997 gives MTC increased decision-making authority over the selection of projects and allocation of funds for the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 8.2 ROADWAY SYSTEM 8.2.1 Street Classifications Map 8.1 illustrates the roadway system in the Planning Area including the Routes of Regional Significance as designated by the CCTA. The system is composed of freeways, parkways, major thoroughfares, secondary thoroughfares, and minor streets. Freeways serve regional and inter-city trips and are maintained by the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). In Richmond, I-580 and I-80 are state- maintained freeways. Parkways are highways that provide movement of through traffic at speeds exceeding those acceptable on other surface streets. Access is controlled and at- grade crossings are permitted. The Richmond Parkway is the only parkway in the City. The current Richmond General Plan (1994) defines Routes of Regional Significance, major thoroughfares and secondary thoroughfares as follows: Routes of Regional Significance – Roadways that connect two or more "regions" of Contra Costa County, cross Contra Costa County boundaries, carry a significant amount of traffic, or provide access to a regional highway or a transit facility. DRAFT 5 City
Recommended publications
  • West Contra Costa County High Capacity Transit

    West Contra Costa County High Capacity Transit

    El Cerrito February 28, 2017 Hercules El Cerrito City Councilmembers El Sobrante Municipal Advisory Councilmembers Hercules City Councilmembers Pinole City Councilmembers Pinole Richmond City Councilmembers San Pablo City Councilmembers Richmond RE: West County High Capacity Transit Study Update and Presentation Dear Councimembers: Thank you for the opportunity to share with you West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory San Pablo Committee’s progress on its West County High Capacity Transit Study. The study is nearing completion and we are seeking stakeholder and public opinion on the initial draft findings from the study. Your staff have invited us to give presentations to your Councils on the West County High Capacity Transit Study’s highlights and gather community feedback. Contra Costa County BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION In the spring of 2015, WCCTAC launched its West County High Capacity Transit Study. A team of transportation consultants working with the WCCTAC Board and its Technical Advisory Committee and staff developed study goals and objectives and evaluated existing and future AC Transit transportation networks, land uses, and travel markets. The study’s consultants analyzed this information then developed an initial set of alternatives that then underwent a technical evaluation that considered travel time improvements, access to regional transit centers, transit market potential, service to low-income areas and markets lacking major transit connections, etc. BART Throughout this study process, community outreach efforts have been on-going. A study- dedicated website (www.WestCountyTransitStudy.com) provides the public with opportunities to check on the study’s status and review presentations and technical memos. In November 2015, WCCTAC and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) held a joint telephone town hall, which attracted 2,045 total attendees, with 700 callers at its peak and an average of 150 WestCAT 6333 Potrero Avenue, Suite 100, El Cerrito CA 94530 Phone: 510.210.5930 ~ www.wcctac.org attendees over sixty minutes.
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan

    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
  • Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority

    Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority

    Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Steering Committee Draft | Ocotber 2020 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan Contra Costa Transportation Authority Prepared By: 1625 Shattuck Avenue Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com Table of Contents List of Figures & Tables ii Executive Summary 3 1. Introduction 13 1.1 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Lifeline Transportation Program 13 1.2 CBTP Guidelines 14 1.3 2004 Richmond-Area CBTP 15 1.4 Current Richmond Area CBTP 15 1.5 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 17 2. Study Area Profile 18 2.1 Demographic Analysis 18 2.2 Transportation Patterns 24 2.3 Transportation Network 28 3. Previous Studies and Mobility Gaps 33 3.1 Local Studies 33 3.2 Countywide Studies 37 3.3 Current Studies 39 3.4 Thematic Mobility Challenges 40 4. Outreach and Engagement Summary 43 4.1 CBTP Advisor Groups 43 4.2 Outreach Strategy 44 4.3 Outreach Awareness 44 4.4 Outreach Results 46 4.5 Outreach Summary 54 5. Methodology and Recommendations 56 5.1 COVID-19 and CBTP Development 56 5.2 Evaluation Criteria 57 5.3 Evaluation Process 60 5.4 Recommended Projects and Plans 62 Appendix A Existing Conditions Report Appendix B Outreach Materials and Results Appendix C Recommendations Scoring Results Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan i Contra Costa Transportation Authority List of Figures
  • California Redevelopment & Tax Allocation Bonds

    California Redevelopment & Tax Allocation Bonds

    SECTOR STudy California Redevelopment & Tax Allocation Bonds One of a series of sector reports on key risk factors and trends in the tax allocation bond market EXPERIENCE COMMITMENT STRENGTH 9/09 TABLE of Contents Part 1: Background __________________________________________________________________ 2 Part 2: analytical considerations for reviewing TABs _____________________________ 4 Part 3: current challenges _______________________________________________________ 21 Part 4: national’s insured Portfolio _____________________________________________ 23 aPPendix summary & notes _________________________________________________________ 28 aPPendix a ___________________________________________________________________________ 29 aPPendix B ___________________________________________________________________________ 39 aPPendix c___________________________________________________________________________ 67 CaliforniA REdEvelopmEnT & TAx AllocatiOn BOndS In our continuing effort to provide topical, comprehensive public sector updates, National Public Finance Guarantee (“National”) is pleased to present this analysis of the Redevelopment and Tax Allocation Bond (“TAB”) sector in the State of California. Our study begins with a brief background on California redevelopment, followed by an in-depth look at the analytical con- siderations for reviewing TABs. The report also highlights the current challenges facing redevelopment agencies. The study closes with a brief overview of the historical performance of National’s TAB portfolio as well as summary
  • PW Pavement Management Program Report

    PW Pavement Management Program Report

    PTAP-21 Napa County Final Report 2020-21 Pavement Management Program Update March 17, 2021 Prepared by: The preparation of this report has been financed in part by grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms & Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. iii I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 II. Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 IV. Network Description and Inventory ................................................................................................ 4 V. Existing Pavement Condition ............................................................................................................ 5 VI. Pavement Management Strategies ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Budget Needs
  • 92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENT

    92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENT

    2016/2017 Count Summary 2018 Count Summary PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Scooters Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped ID City North/South East/West Riding Riding 1 Alameda BROADWAY LINCOLN AVENUE 35 8 5 4 93 29 69 49 10 3 4 - 92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 69 10 25 12 113 63 190 71 18 10 - - 87 52 124 3 Alameda MAIN ST RALPH APPEZATO MEMORIAL PARKWAY 97 15 51 7 24 27 3 1 1 2 14 4 Alameda PARK STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 42 33 2 - 1,039 21 1,561 73 29 25 - 1 1,262 28 1,584 5 Alameda PARK STREET OTIS DRIVE 35 23 6 - 332 22 317 65 23 15 15 5 335 10 296 6 Alameda WEBSTER STREET ATLANTIC AVENUE 33 18 4 - 425 34 627 26 24 19 - 5 301 20 440 7 Alameda WEBSTER ST SANTA CLARA AVE 41 19 15 7 514 50 18 19 1 4 479 8 Alameda County ASHLAND AVE LEWELLING BLVD 12 3 8 1 33 13 90 13 1 7 5 1 33 12 122 9 Alameda County CENTER ST CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 2 - - - 25 4 16 21 15 6 3 12 15 4 10 Alameda County REDWOOD RD CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 45 29 7 6 195 21 134 26 22 7 - 205 16 181 11 Alameda County E 14TH ST 159TH AVE 23 13 11 - 202 24 15 12 - 160 12 Alameda County FOOTHILL BLVD 164TH AVE.
  • West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan

    West Contra Costa/Albany Transit Wayfinding Plan

    FINAL WEST CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIC PLAN and WEST CONTRA COSTA/ALBANY TRANSIT WAYFINDING PLAN Prepared for: West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee October 2011 Acknowledgements WCCTAC BOARD City of El Cerrito Janet Abelson, Vice Chair City of Hercules Donald Kuehne City of Pinole Roy Swearingen, Chair City of Richmond Courtland “Corky” Boozé City of Richmond Thomas Butt City of Richmond Jeff Ritterman City of San Pablo Genoveva Calloway AC Transit Joe Wallace BART Joel Keller WestCAT Tom Hansen Contra Costa County John Gioia WCCTAC STAFF Christina Atienza, Executive Director Linda Young John Rudolph Joanna Pollock WCCTAC WORKING GROUP City of El Cerrito Yvetteh Ortiz City of Hercules Robert Reber City of Pinole Winston Rhodes City of Richmond Chad Smalley, Hector Rojas, Steven Tam City of San Pablo Kanwal Sandhu, Adele Ho AC Transit Nathan Landau, Puja Sarna, Aaron Priven BART Diedre Heitman WestCAT Rob Thompson Contra Costa County Jamar Stamps MTC Jay Stagi CONSULTANT TEAM Fehr & Peers Nelson/Nygaard Bob Grandy (Project Manager) Linda Rhine Brooke DuBose (Deputy PM) Joey Goldman Matthew Ridgway Meghan Mitman Studio L’Image Ellen Poling Sue Labouvie Josh Peterman Max Heim Steve Rhyne Carrie Carsell Eisen Letunic Nikki Hervol Niko Letunic Nikki Foletta table of contents I Introduction II Study Locations III Community Participation IV Travel Demand Management & Parking Strategies V Richmond BART Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VI Richmond Parkway Transit Center Enhancement Strategies VII El Cerrito Del
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021

    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021

    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
  • AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018

    AQ Conformity Amended PBA 2040 Supplemental Report Mar.2018

    TRANSPORTATION-AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Metropolitan Transportation Commission Association of Bay Area Governments MARCH 2018 Metropolitan Transportation Commission Jake Mackenzie, Chair Dorene M. Giacopini Julie Pierce Sonoma County and Cities U.S. Department of Transportation Association of Bay Area Governments Scott Haggerty, Vice Chair Federal D. Glover Alameda County Contra Costa County Bijan Sartipi California State Alicia C. Aguirre Anne W. Halsted Transportation Agency Cities of San Mateo County San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Libby Schaaf Tom Azumbrado Oakland Mayor’s Appointee U.S. Department of Housing Nick Josefowitz and Urban Development San Francisco Mayor’s Appointee Warren Slocum San Mateo County Jeannie Bruins Jane Kim Cities of Santa Clara County City and County of San Francisco James P. Spering Solano County and Cities Damon Connolly Sam Liccardo Marin County and Cities San Jose Mayor’s Appointee Amy R. Worth Cities of Contra Costa County Dave Cortese Alfredo Pedroza Santa Clara County Napa County and Cities Carol Dutra-Vernaci Cities of Alameda County Association of Bay Area Governments Supervisor David Rabbit Supervisor David Cortese Councilmember Pradeep Gupta ABAG President Santa Clara City of South San Francisco / County of Sonoma San Mateo Supervisor Erin Hannigan Mayor Greg Scharff Solano Mayor Liz Gibbons ABAG Vice President City of Campbell / Santa Clara City of Palo Alto Representatives From Mayor Len Augustine Cities in Each County City of Vacaville
  • Transit Information El Cerrito Del Norte Station El Cerrito

    Transit Information El Cerrito Del Norte Station El Cerrito

    Transit Stops Paradas del tránsito 公車站地圖 On Key Blvd at Cutting Blvd: Transit On Cutting Blvd: Information JL•JR•JPX 7 El Cerrito del 72•72M•72R Oakland Norte Station 76 OHLONE GREENWAY 376 El Cerrito 684 800 San Francisco Map Key You Are Here ONLYBUS 3-Minute Walk CUTTING BLVD 500ft/150m Radius Bus Transit Stop BART Parking 29 BART Police Bike Lockers Bike Parking Green Express Line Inside Station: Elevator Escalator All BART Trains Passenger Pick-up/Drop-off L San Francisco Restrooms Stairs Red Line•82 Station Agent Booth Station Entrance/Exit Taxi Stand Telephone 72 Hilltop Mall Ticket Vending: 72R Contra Costa College Clipper/BART Tickets 72M Point Richmond Addfare 800 Richmond BART Paratransit Transit Information L Drop-Off Only Transit Lines Construction AC Transit SAN PABLO AVE Local Bus Lines 7 Downtown Berkeley CDPH Shuttle 72 Hilltop Mall A r e a 72 Jack London Square 72M Point Richmond 72M Jack London Square 72R Contra Costa College 72R Jack London Square 76 Hilltop Mall 376 Pinole Nights 40 All Nighter Bus Lines (Approx. 1 am–5 am) 800 San Francisco (Market St & Van Ness Ave) 800 Richmond BART Transbay Bus Line 704 L San Francisco Early Bird Express 704 San Francisco Temporary Transbay Terminal Golden Gate Transit 40 San Rafael Transit Center ONLYBUS SolanoExpress 82 Sereno Transit Center Green Express Fair eld / Suisun City Red Line Vallejo / Fair eld / Suisun City N Vine Transit 29 Napa WestCAT W E JL Hilltop Mall / Pinole / Hercules Transit Center JR Pinole / Hercules Transit Center JPX Pinole / Hercules Transit Center Note: Service may vary with time of day or day S of week.
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL

    Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL

    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
  • Celebrating Our Second Store in Illinois! 5 Woodfield Mall, Schaumburg, IL 60173 Photo Shown: UNIQLO Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL This Is Lifewear

    Celebrating Our Second Store in Illinois! 5 Woodfield Mall, Schaumburg, IL 60173 Photo Shown: UNIQLO Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL This Is Lifewear

    Celebrating our second store in Illinois! 5 Woodfield Mall, Schaumburg, IL 60173 Photo shown: UNIQLO Michigan Ave, Chicago, IL This Is LifeWear Who you are, what you believe in: that’s what you wear every day. And that is what we make clothing for. Welcome to a new way of apparel. Apparel that comes from our Japanese values of simplicity, quality and longevity. Designed to be of the time and for the time. Made with such modern elegance that it becomes the building blocks of your style. A perfect shirt that is always being made more perfect. The simplest design hiding the most thoughtful and modern details. The best in fit and fabric made to be affordable and accessible to all. Clothing that we are constantly innovating, bringing more warmth, more lightness, better design, and better comfort to your life. It never stops evolving because your life never stops changing. Simple apparel with a not-so-simple purpose: to make your life better. Uniqlo LifeWear. Simple made better. Extra Fine Merino The luxurious texture and quality you’ll know MEN as soon as you touch it. Known worldwide as the Extra Fine Merino best in merino wool. Woven for warmth. V-Neck Sweater WOMEN $39.90 Extra Fine Merino Crew Neck Sweater $29.90 WOMEN 3D Extra Fine Merino Ribbed Turtleneck Long-Sleeve Dress $59.90 Made with 100% natural extra fine merino wool. Premium smoothness at first touch. Supremely soft and highly breathable, Made with ultra-fine fibers of just 19.5 microns for supreme softness and luster. Extra Fine Merino is a premium Luxurious Extra wool fabric that is also used in high-end suits.