DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights and Democratic Reform in Iran Senate Foreign

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights and Democratic Reform in Iran Senate Foreign www.pomed.org ♦ 1820 Jefferson Place NW, Suite 400 ♦ Washington, DC 20036 Human Rights and Democratic Reform in Iran Senate Foreign Relations Committee Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs 419 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Wednesday 10:00 – 12:00 pm On Wednesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs held a hearing entitled “Human Rights and Democratic Reform in Iran.” Senator Robert P. Casey (D-PA) chaired the committee hearing, Senators James Risch (R-ID), Tom Udal (D- NM) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) were also present. Assistant Secretary of State Bureau for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Michael H. Posner; Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs , Mr. Philo L. Dibble; Mr. Kambiz Hosseini, from Voice of America; Senior Program Manager from Freedom House, Mr. Andrew Apostolou; and Ms. Rudi Bakhtiar, Communications Director International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran, all testified before the subcommittee. For full testimonies, click here. Senator Casey opened the hearing by discussing the momentous events and democratic uprisings that have taken place across the Middle East this spring. In this context, he stated that the pro-democracy movement in Iran is the greatest challenge to the Islamic authority in Iran. He asserted: “During the uprising in 2009 pro-democracy protesters took to the streets demanding the same rights that have been demanded across the region this spring.” Since then, he stated, the security forces have used live ammunition and “deplorable” tactics to suppress the Iranian opposition. Senator Casey highlighted a number of political activists who are serving lengthy prison sentences for working for human rights and democracy in Iran. He also discussed his legislation that he introduced in 2010 to recognize and address the human rights abuses across Iran, along with the newly established special human rights rapporteur that was created by the UN Human Rights Council to address the human rights abuses in Iran. He finished by stating, the United States must work with the international community to support the democratic movement in Iran and end the ongoing human rights abuses. “The United States has a moral obligation to stand in support of the Iranian peoples struggle for democracy.” Michael Posner began: “Now more than ever we need to be redoubling our efforts to both speak out against the systematic violations of human rights but also engage our allies to amplify the voices of democratic promotion from in Iran.” Mr. Posner highlighted the killing of protesters in February in Tehran along with minority ethnic community members who were killed in April, as recent examples of the continued violence. Mr. Posner stated that universities that teach liberal arts have been forced to close their doors because they are un-Islamic. This was just one example of countless other hindrances of free speech within the country. Mr. Posner also noted a few activists who have faced overtly oppressive punishment for being involved in democratic activities. Mr. Posner stated that the United States is seeking to spotlight Iran’s gross human rights violations at the UN and multilaterally with our allies. Mr. Posner also highlighted that $22 million dollars has been spent on internet freedom projects and another $28 million dollars was appropriated for continued efforts this spring. These programs, he stated, www.pomed.org ♦ 1820 Jefferson Place NW, Suite 400 ♦ Washington, DC 20036 seek to counter censorship technologies and secure mobile communications while protecting online activists against cyber attacks. Mr. Dibble stated that the Iranian Government’s repression has intensified and that “we (the U.S.) have increased our diplomatic efforts” to combat these gross human rights violations. He argued that the Obama administration has spoken out against these offenses nearly a dozen times this year, seeking to end these human rights violations. He also highlighted the establishment of the special rapporteur at the UN Human Rights Council to attempt to combat and shed light on the grave human rights situation in Iran. Mr. Dibble also articulated that the U.S. Government is seeking to work multilaterally to establish sanction programs to put pressure on the Iranian Government to cease its human rights abuses and oppressive tactics. He stated that the U.S. Government is seeking to work with their European counterparts and other allies to ensure that the Iranian human rights issue is at the forefront of policy in dealing with Iran. Sen. Casey asked the panel who in the U.S. Government is taking the lead on this issue. Mr. Posner responded and stated that the administration is working to appoint special envoys along with making the Iranian issue an everyday issue of the U.S. Government. “The main messengers of this issue are the President and the Secretary of State,” he went on to state that there is no issue that they have spoken out on more. He stated that he hopes to keep it this way so that they are taking the lead on addressing the Iranian human rights issue. “We are all in alignment here, this is a priority for the United States.” When asked about the importance of the rapporteur by Sen. Casey, Mr. Posner responded that this person will be the focal point of activists both in Iran and outside who are seeking to tell their stories and have a UN official listen. This person, according to Posner, will be responsible for shining a light on the issues and gathering information from activists. Mr. Posner also stated that this will also force all governments of the world not just the United States to address human rights concerns in Iran, because it is not just a western discussion but a UN effort. Mr. Dibble highlighted that the effort was able to secure votes not only from Europe, but from other countries who Iran was counting on to counter the effort. When asked by Sen. Casey how the rapporteur will function, Mr. Posner stated that the individual will be chosen at the June session of the UN Human Rights Council. The individual will seek approval of the Iranian Government to enter Iran, but Mr. Posner stated that it would not be surprising that this will not be granted. He asserted that this individual will seek to meet and speak with individuals both within Iran and outside to gather information and transfer this information to increase efforts to end the human rights abuses. Senator Udal asked if there is any evidence that the Iranian regime is changing its actions in response to the work taking place at the UN Human Rights Council. Mr. Posner responded that the Iranian Government has not appeared to change or respond, but he stated that the Iranian Government seems “hyper-sensitive” to thwart UN efforts to address human rights issues in the country. Senator Shaheen asked what the Arab spring has done to affect the internal dynamics within the Iranian regime, and how the U.S. should respond to this. Mr. Dribble responded that it is very difficult to see any direct connection, but disagreements between institutions have been present for “some time” in Iran and that it appears that the rifts have more to do with power than regional events. Sen. Casey asked how the sanctions seem to be affecting the regimes behavior, and also if there are sanctions that the U.S. can pursue to enhance efforts thus far. Mr. Dribble stated that the U.S. Government www.pomed.org ♦ 1820 Jefferson Place NW ♦ Washington, DC 20036 has not seen a change in Iran’s “strategic calculus” in response to sanctions. He also stated that what they have seen is that Iran has had to work harder to seek out strategies to deal with their economic isolation. In respect to human rights he stated that this is not an “easy sell” and that the Iranian Government is going to resist as hard as it can especially in light of the Arab uprisings. However, he stated that this is strong international solidarity and it must be exploited as soon as possible. Also he stated that the U.S. must seek out support from the “non-aligned” countries. He also stated that he hesitates to suggest any sanction efforts and stated that the administration feels like it has the power to do all that it can. Ms. Rudi Bakhtiar described the Iranian human rights situation has hitting an "unprecedented new low." She stated that following the 2009 elections that Iran has gone on an "execution binge." The increased suppression and the broader policies of crackdowns on all opposition forces are part of an effort by the Iranian Government "to terrorize Iranian citizens." She went on to argue that the Iranian judiciary is becoming increasingly politicized and is being used as a tool of state security to have sham trials and obscene sentences for political prisoners. Ms. Bakhtiar stated that the current administration's efforts are strongly in support of democracy and human rights in Iran and that although severe repression exists the reformist elements of Iranian society continue to fight for freedom. Mr. Apostolou argued that that the Arab revolts must be supported, especially in Syria, because the repressive tactics there are supportive of the Iranian regime. He asserted that a democratic Syria would "cut an arm off of Iran." He stated that the crackdown on human rights defenders in Iran needs to be directly addressed by high ranking U.S. officials. These efforts combined with sanctions and multilateral support are necessary, he stated, so that activists are able to easily report human rights abuses and are prepared for "their next opportunity" to foment revolution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prepared Testimony to the United States Senate Foreign Relations
    Prepared Testimony to the United States Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Near Eastern and South and Central Asian Affairs May 11, 2011 HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIC REFORM IN IRAN Andrew Apostolou, Freedom House Chairman Casey, Ranking member Risch, Members of the Subcommittee, it is an honour to be invited to address you and to represent Freedom House. Please allow me to thank you and your staff for all your efforts to advance the cause of human rights and democracy in Iran. It is also a great pleasure to be here with Rudi Bakhtiar and Kambiz Hosseini. They are leaders in how we communicate the human rights issue, both to Iran and to the rest of the world. Freedom House is celebrating its 70th anniversary. We were founded on the eve of the United States‟ entry into World War II by Eleanor Roosevelt and Wendell Wilkie to act as an ideological counterweight to the Nazi‟s anti-democratic ideology. The Nazi headquarters in Munich was known as the Braunes Haus, so Roosevelt and Wilkie founded Freedom House in response. The ruins of the Braunes Haus are now a memorial. Freedom House is actively promoting democracy and freedom around the world. The Second World War context of our foundation is relevant to our Iran work. The Iranian state despises liberal democracy, routinely violates human rights norms through its domestic repression, mocks and denies the Holocaust. Given the threat that the Iranian state poses to its own population and to the Middle East, we regard Iran as an institutional priority. In addition to Freedom House‟s well-known analyses on the state of freedom in the world and our advocacy for democracy, we support democratic activists in some of the world‟s most repressive societies, including Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 June 8, 2020 to Members of The
    June 8, 2020 To Members of the United Nations Human Rights Council Re: Request for the Convening of a Special Session on the Escalating Situation of Police Violence and Repression of Protests in the United States Excellencies, The undersigned family members of victims of police killings and civil society organizations from around the world, call on member states of the UN Human Rights Council to urgently convene a Special Session on the situation of human rights in the United States in order to respond to the unfolding grave human rights crisis borne out of the repression of nationwide protests. The recent protests erupted on May 26 in response to the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which was only one of a recent string of unlawful killings of unarmed Black people by police and armed white vigilantes. We are deeply concerned about the escalation in violent police responses to largely peaceful protests in the United States, which included the use of rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray and in some cases live ammunition, in violation of international standards on the use of force and management of assemblies including recent U.N. Guidance on Less Lethal Weapons. Additionally, we are greatly concerned that rather than using his position to serve as a force for calm and unity, President Trump has chosen to weaponize the tensions through his rhetoric, evidenced by his promise to seize authority from Governors who fail to take the most extreme tactics against protestors and to deploy federal armed forces against protestors (an action which would be of questionable legality).
    [Show full text]
  • Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights After the Election
    Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights June 2017 After the Election Iranian President’s Pathway to Fulfill His Promises Center for Human Rights in Iran (CHRI) New York Headquarters: Tel: +1 347-689-7782 www.iranhumanrights.org Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights After the Election Copyright © Center for Human Rights in Iran Rouhani: Delivering Human Rights After the Election Rouhani’s pathway to fulfill his promises: Utilize his power, negotiate the system, hold rights violators responsible, engage and empower civil society June 2017 The re-election of President Hassan Rouhani on May 19, 2017 was due in large part to the perception by the Iranian citizenry that his government would do more to improve human rights in Iran than his rivals—an outcome clearly desired by a majority of voters. During Rouhani’s campaign rallies, not only did he make explicit references to issues of political and social freedom and promises to uphold such freedoms in his second term, his supporters also repeatedly made clear their demands for improvements in human rights. Despite Iran’s tradition of giving the incumbent a second term, Rouhani’s re-election was uncertain. Many Iranians struggling with high unemployment and other economic problems did not see any improvement in their daily lives from Rouhani’s signature achievement—the nuclear deal and easing of interna- tional sanctions. Yet even though the other candidates offered subsidies and populist proposals, and Rouhani’s economic proposals were modest, he won by a large margin—far greater than his win in 2013. In addition to his rejec- tion of populist economics, Rouhani was the only candidate that talked about human rights—and the more he focused on this issue, the more his support coalesced and strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • CRP News & Background
    „ D i s c o v e r i n g I n t e r n a t i o n a l R e l a t i o n s a n d C o n t e m p o r a r y G l o b a l I s s u e s ” Cultural Relations Policy News and Background November 2012 ICRP Monthly Review Series 2012 About CRP News & Background Cultural Relations Policy News & Background is a part of ICRP Monthly Review Series and an initiative of Institute for Cultural Relations Policy Budapest. Launched in 2012, its mission is to provide information and analysis on key international political events. Each issue covers up-to-date events and analysis of current concerns of international relations on a monthly basis. As an initiative of ICRP, the content of this magazine is written and edited by student authors. The project, as part of the Institute’s Internship Programme provides the opportunity to strengthen professional skills. Editorial Team Andras Lorincz, Series Editor Adam Torok, Author – Issue November 2012 Csilla Morauszki, Executive Publisher © Institute for Cultural Relations Policy ICRP Geopolitika Kft 45 Gyongyosi utca, Budapest 1031 - Hungary Contents 01 Ten days of war between Gaza and Israel 05 Catalonia steps closer to independence 07 Austerity unites Europe 08 Storm ended with acquittal 10 Obama presidency continues 12 Rise of Palestine’s status 14 Diplomatic progress of Syrian opposition 17 Goma in the hands of rebels for 10 days 20 Clashes of religions in Nigeria 22 Al-Shabaab stroke back in Kenya 23 Scramble for oil in the Caribbean 25 Asian summits in Cambodia 28 News in Brief 01 ICRP Monthly Review Series | November 2012 Ten days of war between Gaza and Israel Antagonism of Israel and the Hamas sympathiser Palestinians of the Gaza Strip have been tensioning situations in the Middle East for years and caused a long string of incidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2019 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is an authoritarian theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist). Shia clergy, most notably the rahbar (supreme leader), and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate key power structures. The supreme leader is the head of state. The members of the Assembly of Experts are nominally directly elected in popular elections. The assembly selects and may dismiss the supreme leader. The candidates for the Assembly of Experts, however, are vetted by the Guardian Council (see below) and are therefore selected indirectly by the supreme leader himself. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has held the position since 1989. He has direct or indirect control over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority. The supreme leader holds constitutional authority over the judiciary, government-run media, and other key institutions. While mechanisms for popular election exist for the president, who is head of government, and for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament or majles), the unelected Guardian Council vets candidates, routinely disqualifying them based on political or other considerations, and controls the election process. The supreme leader appoints half of the 12-member Guardian Council, while the head of the judiciary (who is appointed by the supreme leader) appoints the other half. Parliamentary elections held in 2016 and presidential elections held in 2017 were not considered free and fair. The supreme leader holds ultimate authority over all security agencies. Several agencies share responsibility for law enforcement and maintaining order, including the Ministry of Intelligence and Security and law enforcement forces under the Interior Ministry, which report to the president, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which reports directly to the supreme leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Rights and Feminist Movements in Iran1
    WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND FEMINIST MOVEMENTS IN IRAN1 Nayereh Tohidi • An overview of how the Iranian women’s movement • has emerged in the face of unique contexts ABSTRACT The status of women’s rights in Iran can appear contradictory at first glance – despite both high levels of education and low birth rates, for example, participation of women in the work force or in parliament is amongst the lowest in the world. In this summary of her chapter in the book Women’s Movements in the Global Era – The Power of Local Feminisms (Westview Press, 2016), Nayereh Tohidi offers a fascinating overview of women’s rights and the feminist movement in Iran. The author highlights how the demands, strategies, tactics, effectiveness and achievements of the movement have varied in accordance with socioeconomic developments, state policies, political trends, and cultural contexts at national and international levels. Tohidi suggests that this history can be roughly divided into eight periods from the era of Constitutional Revolution and constitutionalism (1905–1925) until the modern day under President Rouhani. Finally, despite various challenges, the author notes that the women’s movement in Iran continues to grow and reminds the reader of the key role that civil society plays in guaranteeing equal rights and gender justice in Iran and beyond. KEYWORDS Iran | Women’s rights | Feminism • SUR 24 - v.13 n.24 • 75 - 89 | 2016 75 WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND FEMINIST MOVEMENTS IN IRAN Women’s status and rights in contemporary Iran, and thereby the trajectory of Iranian women’s
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Khomeinism Executive Summary: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini
    Khomeinism Executive Summary: Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the country’s first supreme leader, is one of the most influential shapers of radical Islamic thought in the modern era. Khomeini’s Islamist, populist agenda—dubbed “Khomeinism” by scholar Ervand Abrahamian—has radicalized and guided Shiite Islamists both inside and outside Iran. Khomeini’s legacy has directly spawned or influenced major violent extremist organizations, including Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as well as Lebanese-based terrorist organization and political party Hezbollah, and the more recently formed Iraqi-based Shiite militias, many of which stand accused of carrying out gross human rights violations. (Sources: BBC News, Atlantic, Reuters, Washington Post, Human Rights Watch, Constitution.com) Khomeini’s defining ideology focuses on a variety of themes, including absolute religious authority in government and the rejection of Western interference and influence. Khomeini popularized the Shiite Islamic concept of vilayat-e faqih—which translates to “guardianship of the Islamic jurist”— in order to place all of Iran’s religious and state institutions under the control of a single cleric. Khomeini’s successor, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, relies on Khomeinist ideals to continue his authoritarian domestic policies and support for terrorism abroad. (Sources: Al-Islam, Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic, Ervand Abrahamian, pp. 15-25, Islamic Parliament Research Center, New York Times) More than 25 years after his death, Khomeini’s philosophies and teachings continue to influence all levels of Iran’s political system, including Iran’s legislative and presidential elections. In an interview with Iran’s Press TV, London-based professor of Islamic studies Mohammad Saeid Bahmanpoor said that Khomeini “has become a concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in Iran Under the Shah
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 7 1980 Human Rights in Iran under the Shah Richard W. Cottam Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard W. Cottam, Human Rights in Iran under the Shah, 12 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 121 (1980) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol12/iss1/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Volume 12, Number 1, Winter 1980 COMMENT Human Rights in Iran Under the Shah by Professor Richard W. Cottam* I. INTRODUCTION FOR ANY ADVOCATE of human rights, the events surrounding the Iranian revolution must be a source of continuing agony. But for any- one interested in gaining a sharper understanding of some of the basic issues concerning human rights, the dramatic developments in Iran should be highly instructive. The early summary executions in Iran and the later public trials conducted by revolutionary Islamic courts were properly condemned by western human rights advocates as failing to ap- proach the requirements of due process. Yet the great majority of those who were tried and executed were charged with terrible violations of the most elemental human rights; and the testimony of the accused, so rich in detail and so internally consistent as to be credible,1 tends to confirm the worst charges against the Shah's regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Accountability Week
    Mark Dubowitz May 4, 2016 Iran Accountability Week Testimony before the Canadian Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights Mark Dubowitz Executive Director Foundation for Defense of Democracies May 4, 2016 Introduction: Chairman Munson, members of the committee, thank you for inviting me to appear before this distinguished committee. I applaud the Canadian Parliament for the annual Iran Accountability Week, an important series of events to draw attention to Iran’s deplorable record of human rights violations, support for terrorism, and regional aggression. I had the honor of testifying during the last four years, and I’ve had the privilege of working with former Member of Parliament and Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler. Professor Cotler is an essential voice, speaking for oppressed people around the world. Some had anticipated that with the election of President Rouhani, real change on the human rights front would occur. Moreover, they hoped that the Iran nuclear deal would be the first step in bringing Iran into the community of nations that respect international norms. But neither Rouhani’s election nor last summer’s nuclear agreement between Tehran and the P5+1 addressed the full range of Iran’s illicit activities, including ballistic missile development, support for terrorism, regional destabilization, and systemic human rights abuses. In fact, the situation has worsened. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is a fundamentally flawed arms control agreement because it provides Iran with a patient pathway to a nuclear weapons capability by placing only limited, temporary, and reversible constraints on Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for substantial sanctions relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 2018 Human Rights Report
    IRAN 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Islamic Republic of Iran is an authoritarian theocratic republic with a Shia Islamic political system based on velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist or governance by the jurist). Shia clergy, most notably the rahbar (supreme jurist or supreme leader), and political leaders vetted by the clergy dominate key power structures. The supreme leader is the head of state. The members of the Assembly of Experts are in theory directly elected in popular elections, and the assembly selects and may dismiss the supreme leader. The candidates for the Assembly of Experts, however, are vetted by the Guardian Council (see below) and are therefore selected indirectly by the supreme leader himself. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has held the position since 1989. He has direct or indirect control over the legislative and executive branches of government through unelected councils under his authority. The supreme leader holds constitutional authority over the judiciary, government- run media, and armed forces, and indirectly controls internal security forces and other key institutions. While mechanisms for popular election exist for the president, who is head of government, and for the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament or majles), the unelected Guardian Council vets candidates and controls the election process. The supreme leader appoints half of the 12-member Guardian Council, while the head of the judiciary (who is appointed by the supreme leader) appoints the other half. Candidate vetting excluded all but six candidates of 1,636 individuals who registered for the 2017 presidential race. In May 2017 voters re-elected Hassan Rouhani as president.
    [Show full text]
  • Over 150 Ngos Appeal for Death Sentences of Four Yemeni Journalists to Be Overturned
    Over 150 NGOs Appeal for Death Sentences of Four Yemeni Journalists to be Overturned Organisations which support human rights, press freedom and journalists are calling on United Nations mechanisms and member states to help save the lives of four Yemeni journalists who were sentenced to death in April 2020 in the capital Sana’a on charges of “spying” and “spreading false news.” Of the six other journalists in the same case whom the judge ordered to be freed, after five years in detention, only one has been released so far. The de facto authorities in Sana’a, the Houthis, must immediately overturn the death sentences and free the other nine journalists who have been convicted in violation of their right to freedom of expression. We recently celebrated World Press Freedom Day on 3 May 2020. Journalism, especially independent and critical journalism, is vital to promote transparency accountability, good governance and respect for human rights and the rule of law. Journalists are in no way actors in the conflict in Yemen and cannot be targeted under any circumstances. The four journalists, Abdulkhaleq Ahmed Amran, Akram Saleh Al-Walidi, Al-Hareth Saleh Hamid and Tawfiq Mohammed Al-Mansouri were convicted on 11 April 2020 by the Specialised Criminal Court in Sana’a, which is controlled by the Houthis. Their lawyer Abdelmajeed Sabra, who was denied access to the verdict hearing, began the appeals process on 22 April 2020. The judge sentenced the other six journalists, Hisham Ahmed Tarmoom, Hisham Abdulmalik Al- Yousefi, Haitham Abdulrahman Al-Shihab, Essam Amin Balgheeth, Hassan Abdullah Annab and Salah Muhammad Al-Qaedi, to time already served in prison, or approximately five years, and also placed them under police supervision for a period of another three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses
    Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs September 5, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32048 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Iran: U.S. Concerns and Policy Responses Summary Addressing the perceived threat posed by Iran to a broad range of U.S. interests has been a top priority for the Obama Administration. A sense of potential crisis with Iran has taken hold since late 2011 as Iran’s nuclear enrichment program continues to advance. That Iranian progress has caused the government of Israel to assert that it might take unilateral military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities unless the United States provides assurances that it will act, militarily if necessary, to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Aside from the nuclear issue, the United States has long seen a threat to U.S. interests posed by Iran’s support for militant groups in the Middle East and in Iraq and Afghanistan. U.S. officials accuse Iran of helping Syria’s leadership try to defeat a growing popular opposition movement and of taking advantage of Shiite majority unrest against the Sunni-led, pro-U.S. government of Bahrain. To counter the perceived threat from Iran, the Obama Administration has orchestrated broad international pressure on Iran through economic sanctions, while also offering Iran sustained engagement if it verifiably assures the international community that its nuclear program is peaceful. Since the beginning of 2012, as significant multilateral sanctions have been added on Iran’s oil exports—including an oil purchase embargo by the European Union that went into full effect on July 1, 2012—the regime has begun to acknowledge significant economic pressure.
    [Show full text]