DOCSLIB.ORG

2021-2030 Ten Year Plan Federal Aid Program CMAQ (75%) FY 2021-2030

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021-2030 Ten Year Plan Federal Aid Program CMAQ (75%) FY 2021-2030 THE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TEN YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2021 - 2030 Projects Only SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNOR’S ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION (GACIT) AS A DRAFT FOR PUBLIC CONSIDERATION AND INPUT PURSUANT TO RSA 228:99 OF THE LAWS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PROJECTS LISTED ALPHABETICALLY PREPARED BY THE NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION August 12, 2019 DRAFT 2021-2030 Ten Year Plan Federal Aid Program CMAQ (75%) FY 2021-2030 $220.0 $207.0 $203.5 $196.6 $194.9 $193.4 $192.7 $200.0 $190.9 $189.4 $191.3 $189.6 $180.0 $160.0 $140.0 $120.0 $100.0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Draft TYP - August 2019 Federal-Aid Target 12-Aug-19 Draft TYP August Total = $ 1,949.21 (in millions) FAST ACT Estimated Revenue = 1892.93 (in millions) Non-Federal Formula Revenue = $ 47.61 (in millions) Total Federal Revenue = $ 1,940.54 Notes: HSIP, RecTrails, TAP Programs at FAST ACT funded levels (with exception of CMAQ at 75%) DRAFT 2021-2030 Ten Year Plan Total Program Dollars by FY Highway and Bridge Other Modes Highway Funded Non-Highway Funded Major SB367 TIFIA 3 Bridge Other 7 1,4,5 2 Turnpike Turnpike 5 6 TYP FY % of Total FY 2,9 I-93 Debt Pledged Sub Total Airport FHWA Projects Betterment SAB Matching Rail Transit Service Paving & Improvement R&R Total Program GARVEE Funds Bridge 2021 $ 206.97 $ 14.84 $ 24.05 $ 20.84 $ 2.15 $ 21.27 $ 14.23 $ 304.35 $ 48.94 $ 24.35 $ 0.66 $ 28.48 $ 45.80 452.58 11.5% 2022 $ 203.46 $ - $ 24.05 $ 10.88 $ 2.20 $ 23.45 $ 3.05 $ 267.08 $ 61.11 $ 13.90 $ 2.10 $ 29.17 $ 24.85 398.22 10.2% 2023 $ 194.86 $ 10.01 $ 24.05 $ 9.37 $ 2.20 $ 26.05 $ 4.41 $ 270.94 $ 63.10 $ 14.40 $ 0.60 $ 29.79 $ 39.20 418.05 10.7% 2024 $ 190.91 $ 13.47 $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 2.20 $ 23.77 $ 2.50 $ 265.40 $ 57.21 $ 13.30 $ 0.60 $ 30.43 $ 27.54 394.47 10.1% 2025 $ 196.62 $ 8.15 $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 2.19 $ 19.70 $ 3.19 $ 262.41 $ 58.73 $ 13.60 $ 2.10 $ 31.08 $ 33.48 401.40 10.2% 2026 $ 189.37 $ 13.65 $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 23.41 $ 1.50 $ 0.34 $ 260.82 $ 47.56 $ 13.80 $ 0.60 $ 31.74 $ 17.19 371.71 9.5% 2027 $ 191.33 $ - $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 23.41 $ 1.50 $ 0.17 $ 248.95 $ 51.12 $ 14.10 $ 0.60 $ 32.39 $ 21.83 368.99 9.4% 2028 $ 193.43 $ - $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 23.41 $ 1.50 $ 1.61 $ 252.49 $ 63.48 $ 14.40 $ 2.10 $ 33.07 $ 28.76 394.31 10.1% 2029 $ 192.72 $ - $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 23.41 $ 1.50 $ 4.52 $ 254.69 $ 42.52 $ 14.70 $ 0.60 $ 32.66 $ 18.65 363.83 9.3% 2030 $ 189.55 $ - $ 24.05 $ 8.50 $ 23.41 $ 1.50 $ 0.05 $ 247.06 $ 30.94 $ 15.00 $ 0.60 $ 33.32 $ 31.24 358.16 9.1% Program Total 1,949.21 60.13 240.50 100.59 127.96 121.74 34.08 2,634.20 524.70 151.55 10.56 312.13 288.56 3,921.70 100.0% % of Total 74.0% 2.3% 9.1% 3.8% 4.9% 4.6% 1.3% 100.0% Program Revenue 8 $1,940.54 $60.13 $240.50 $360.71 $34.08 $ 2,636 $ 524.70 $ 151.55 $ 10.56 $ 312.13 $ 288.56 $ 3,923.46 $2,635.96 $ 1,287.50 Surplus/(Deficit) ($8.67) $0.00 $0.00 $10.43 $0.00 $ 1.75 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1.75 $1.75 Notes: 1. I-93 Payments based on GARVEE Bonds and Debt Service are Included 2. Betterment program maintained at current budget levels and SAB program includes carryover from the State Aid Bridge program 3. Total comprised from project matching costs Maine, Vermont, other states, and municipalities 4. Figures include inflation 5. FHWA categories includes approximately $1.16 million annually to address railroad crossings 6. Self-funded FTA programs and projects are limited to available funds 7. Proposed Turnpike Capital program, and projects that may be constructed under current toll structure ( no toll increase ) 8. FHWA Revenue based on FAST Act anticipated apportionments based on FY 2020 and level funded there after. 9. 2021; 2022; 2023 funding includes other non-formula federal funds (FEMA) ~ Dollars include indirect costs and inflation (2.80%) Dollars in Millions 12-Aug-19 DRAFT 2021-2030 Ten Year Plan Share of Total Program Dollars by Program Airport 7% Transit 8% Rail < 1% Turnpike R&R 4% FHWA 50% Turnpike Improvement 13% Other Matching Funds 1% SB367 9% Betterment 6% GARVEE 2% 12-Aug-19 DRAFT 2021-2030 Ten Year Plan All Funding FISCAL I-93 MANDATED INDIVIDUAL DEBT GRAND YEAR PAVEMENT BRIDGES EXPANSION FEDERAL PROJECTS ROADSIDE RAIL TRANSIT AIRPORTS SERVICE TOTAL 2021 86.39 128.93 30.11 31.26 66.05 11.78 0.60 29.48 45.97 22.00 452.58 2022 71.26 99.00 14.90 31.26 88.93 12.17 2.10 30.17 24.96 23.47 398.22 2023 75.70 99.59 12.50 31.43 91.09 12.63 0.60 30.79 39.33 24.38 418.05 2024 83.18 82.54 12.50 31.26 87.58 12.06 0.60 31.43 28.06 25.27 394.47 2025 92.00 70.20 0.00 31.26 102.92 12.14 2.10 32.08 33.91 24.80 401.40 2026 80.72 84.13 0.00 31.26 81.64 14.06 0.60 32.74 17.39 29.16 371.71 2027 80.93 75.41 0.00 31.32 82.44 14.04 0.60 33.39 21.83 29.04 368.99 2028 72.04 90.56 0.00 31.14 92.67 14.06 2.10 34.07 28.76 28.90 394.31 2029 84.54 88.10 0.00 31.14 60.44 17.92 0.60 33.66 18.65 28.77 363.83 2030 98.72 64.56 0.00 32.63 56.01 14.06 0.60 34.32 31.24 26.03 358.16 Total 825.48 883.02 70.00 313.95 809.77 134.90 10.50 322.13 290.12 261.81 3921.70 % Grand 21.0% 22.5% 1.8% 8.0% 20.6% 3.4% 0.3% 8.2% 7.4% 6.7% 100.0% Total ~ Dollars include indirect costs and inflation (2.80%) ~Totals adjusted in individual years to account for estimated bridge work 12-Aug-19 Draft 2021-2030 Ten Year Plan Share of Total Dollars of Funding DEBT SERVICE AIRPORTS 7% 7% PAVEMENT TRANSIT 21% 8% RAIL 0.3% ROADSIDE 3% BRIDGES 23% INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS 21% I-93 MANDATED EXPANSION FEDERAL 2% 8% 12-Aug-19 2021 - 2030 Pending Approval Ten Year Plan 8/12/2019 ALBANY (29597) Route/Road NH 16 Category INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS Scope SHOULDER WIDENING AND PAVEMENT Strategy TIER 2 RESURFACING TO ENABLE INSTALLATION OF CENTERLINE RUMBLE STRIPS Phase Year Funding Program Right of Way 2021 154,920 None-Highway Construction 2023 844,733 None-Highway Construction 2024 5,992,610 None-Highway Total $6,992,263 Previous Funding $1,927,200 Current TYP Funding $6,992,263 Future Funding Required $0 Total Project Cost $8,919,463 Comments None ALLENSTOWN (40362) Route/Road NH ROUTE 28 Category RED LIST BRIDGES Scope ADDRESS RED LIST BRIDGE CARRYING NH 28 Strategy TIER 2 OVER SUNCOOK RIVER (BR NO 107/098) Phase Year Funding Program Construction 2021 2,261,600 Bridg-T1-2-Rehab-Rcn Total $2,261,600 Previous Funding $400,000 Current TYP Funding $2,261,600 Future Funding Required $0 Total Project Cost $2,661,600 Comments None Includes inflation and indirects using program Page 1 of 224 2021 - 2030 Pending Approval Ten Year Plan 8/12/2019 ALSTEAD (40649) Route/Road HILL ROAD OVER DARBY BROOK Category BRIDGES Scope BRIDGE REHABILITATION-HILL ROAD OVER DARBY Strategy TIER 5 BROOK-BR. #159-134 Phase Year Funding Program Preliminary Engineering 2021 46,671 SAB * Construction 2021 87,431 SAB * Construction 2022 137,857 SAB * Total $271,960 Previous Funding $0 Current TYP Funding $271,960 Future Funding Required $0 Total Project Cost $271,960 Comments None ALSTEAD (40661) Route/Road COMSTOCK ROAD OVER DARBY BROOK Category BRIDGES Scope BRIDGE REPLACEMENT-COMSTOCK ROAD OVER Strategy TIER 5 DARBY BROOK-BR. #046/141 Phase Year Funding Program Preliminary Engineering 2023 141,229 SAB * Right of Way 2023 10,864 SAB * Construction 2023 398,482 SAB * Construction 2024 565,990 SAB * Total $1,116,565 Previous Funding $0 Current TYP Funding $1,116,565 Future Funding Required $0 Total Project Cost $1,116,565 Comments None Includes inflation and indirects using program Page 2 of 224 2021 - 2030 Pending Approval Ten Year Plan 8/12/2019 ALTON (40624) Route/Road NH 11 Category RED LIST BRIDGES Scope ADDRESS RED LIST BRIDGE CARRYING NH 11 Strategy TIER 2 OVER MERRYMEETING RIVER (BR NO 163/184) Phase Year Funding Program Preliminary Engineering 2022 232,492 Bridg-T1-2-Rehab-Rcn Right of Way 2021 113,080 Bridg-T1-2-Rehab-Rcn Construction 2023 1,493,764 Bridg-T1-2-Rehab-Rcn Construction 2024 307,118 Bridg-T1-2-Rehab-Rcn Total $2,146,455 Previous Funding $275,000 Current TYP Funding $2,146,455 Future Funding Required $0 Total Project Cost $2,421,455 Comments None AMHERST (40654) Route/Road MONT VERNON ROAD OVER CEASARS BROOK Category BRIDGES Scope BRIDGE REPLACEMENT-MONT VERNON ROAD Strategy TIER 5 OVER CEASARS BROOK-BR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M a S S a C H U S E T T S EXISTING ITS DEVICES in DISTRICT 5 and TURNPIKES October 1, 2021
    Installed ITS Devices Roadways MAP E CCTV )" Patrol Sheds Interstate 89 DMS Interstate 93 MVDS Interstate 293 " VSL Interstate 393 Existing Devices District 5 & Turnpikes Everett Turnpike October 1, 2021 RWIS NH 101 0 2.25 4.5 9 US Routes Miles State Routes LACONIA BROOKFIELD DANBURY HILL SANBORNTON GILFORD 28A SPRINGFIELD DISTRICT 2 «¬ «¬106 DISTRICT 3 MIDDLETON TILTON BELMONT WILMOT 93 ALTON 11 NEW DURHAM ANDOVER FRANKLIN ¨¦§ «¬ 11 GILMANTON «¬140 MILTON «¬ ¤£4 NORTHFIELD NEW LONDON 103A SALISBURY «¬ FARMINGTON CANTERBURY BARNSTEAD SUTTON «¬129 «¬127 BOSCAWEN LOUDON NEWBURY «¬132 2 WEBSTER 103 PITTSFIELD T «¬ STRAFFORD C I 126 WARNER R ¤£3 «¬ T 89 CHICHESTER S ¨¦§ I 93 ¨¦§ 4 D CONCORD ¤£ BRADFORD EPSOM NORTHWOOD HOPKINTON WASHINGTON DISTRICT 6 202 PEMBROKE HENNIKER ¤£ HILLSBOROUGH «¬43 ALLENSTOWN 152 BOW DEERFIELD «¬ WINDSOR NOTTINGHAM DUNBARTON DEERING WEARE 156 «¬149 «¬77 HOOKSETT «¬ CANDIA ANTRIM EPPING 101 «¬ RAYMOND 101 GOFFSTOWN «¬ BENNINGTON «¬47 FRANCESTOWN 136 114A 293 «¬ «¬ ¨¦§ «¬28A AUBURN FREMONT HANCOCK NEW BOSTON BRENTWOOD MANCHESTER CHESTER GREENFIELD 13 «¬ 102 BEDFORD «¬ SANDOWN DISTRICT 4 121 DANVILLE 28B «¬ 6 «¬ T LYNDEBOROUGH C DUBLIN MONT VERNON I R 111 137 PETERBOROUGH 31 DERRY ¬ T «¬ «¬ « LONDONDERRY HAMPSTEAD S AMHERST I D MERRIMACK 28 NEWTON LITCHFIELD 128 «¬ «¬ ATKINSON WILTON JAFFREY TEMPLE SHARON MILFORD 3A «¬ WINDHAM 123 45 «¬ «¬ 101A «¬ SALEM 122 HUDSON «¬ FEE ¬ 111 GREENVILLE « «¬ HOLLIS RINDGE NEW IPSWICH MASON BROOKLINE NASHUA «¬38 ¬130 PELHAM 1«¬23A « M A S S A C H U S E T T S EXISTING ITS DEVICES IN DISTRICT 5 AND TURNPIKES October 1, 2021 DIRECTION OF MILE DEVICE NAME CITY/TOWN ROUTE LOCATION DESCRIPTION TRAVEL MARKER NH Route 101 Eastbound slope of the Meetinghouse RD/US 101 E 53.8 CCTV AX 5 Bedford NH 101 Eastbound 53.8 Route 3 intersection between US 3 and the Route 101 Eastbound on ramp.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose and Need Environmental Assessment Improvements to I-293 (FE Everett Turnpike), Exit 6 & 7 (Manchester 16099)
    Purpose and Need Environmental Assessment Improvements to I-293 (FE Everett Turnpike), Exit 6 & 7 (Manchester 16099) The draft Purpose and Need outlined here is intended to describe and support the Environmental Assessment which is being developed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Purpose and Need helps to establish the basis for the development of alternatives, and is used to compare the effectiveness and the impacts of the Proposed Action against the No Action Alternative. The Purpose and Need statement is fundamental to the analysis of a project under NEPA, the Clean Water Act (Section 404), and other environmental regulations. Purpose The purpose of this project is to address capacity, safety, and access related deficiencies along a 3.5-mile portion of Interstate 293 (FE Everett Turnpike) in Manchester, New Hampshire, beginning north of Exit 5 (Granite Street) and ending north of Exit 7 (Front Street) by: • Correcting geometric and safety deficiencies while reducing congestion at problem locations within the Study Area; • Accommodating future traffic growth related to commuter trips and the transportation of commercial goods and services through the corridor; and • Improving access to the highway consistent with the long-term vision of the communities of Manchester and Goffstown. Need Interstate 293 (FE Everett Turnpike) is a north-south toll highway in central-southern New Hampshire which serves as a major transportation corridor linking the state capitol of Concord to the residential, industrial, and commercial centers in Manchester, Nashua, and north-central Massachusetts. Interstate 293 connects other regional highways including I-93, US 3, and NH 101 and serves as a major route for commuters and commercial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • SNHPC Draft Congestion Management Process
    Southern New Hampshire ABSTRACT Planning Commission Utilizing travel time data from thousands of drivers, this report identifies varying levels of congestion along roadways, their CONGESTION causes, and recommends strategies to mitigate existing and future MANAGEMENT congested conditions. PROCESS DRAFT October 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 The SNHPC’s Role in Congestion Management ..................................................................................3 1.2 Requirements of a CMP ....................................................................................................................4 2.0 Overview of the CMP Process .......................................................................................................................6 3.0 Regional Objectives for CMP in the SNHPC Region ......................................................................................7 4.0 Definition of the SNHPC Regional CMP Network ...................................................................................... 10 5.0 Definition of Performance Measures ......................................................................................................... 12 6.0 Data and Monitoring of System Performance ........................................................................................... 13 6.1 Travel Time Index (TTI) Thresholds to Quantify Congestion ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Master Plan Update, Merrimack NH
    Merrimack, NH | 2013 Master Plan Update 9. Transportation 9.1 Introduction The Master Plan Update 2002 identified several critical areas of concern relative to existing congestion, transportation deficiencies, and the lack of connectivity within the Town. In addi- tion, the need to create a long-term transportation plan that accommodates mobility within the community for its residents, businesses and visitors and promotes development consis- tent with the Town’s vision was also identified. Key recommended actions from the 2002 report are summarized below with an update on the progress completed to date. Continue to work with the state and regional officials toward implementation of the Manchester Airport Access Road (MAAR) to improve access to the Manchester Airport for Merrimack residents and businesses while also improving access to northern Merrimack’s commercial and industrial areas to the F.E. Everett Turnpike. The MAAR, now formally named Raymond Wieczorek Drive, was completed and opened for public travel in the fall of 2011. The new interchange provides full north and south access between the F.E. Everett Turnpike and US Route 3 in Bedford, just north of the Merrimack town line. This interchange partially filled a gap in the regional transportation system for northern Merrimack residents and businesses where the existing F.E. Everett Turnpike Exit 12 configuration only provides ramps to/from the south. Previously motorists in the northern portion of the Town wishing to travel to/from the Turnpike north would have to travel via US Route 3 to the I-293/NH Route 101 interchange in Bedford to complete this trip or travel south to the Exit 11 interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Design Report
    Prepared For: F.E. Everett Turnpike Widening Project Nashua, Merrimack and Bedford, NH DRAFT Environmental Study Prepared By: State Project No. 13761 53 Regional Drive Concord, NH 03301 August 2018 Nashua-Merrimack-Bedford 13761 Environmental Study Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Lead Federal Agency ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Need Statement .................................................................................................. 1-2 2 Alternatives ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Mainline Turnpike ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Pennichuck Brook ..................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 F.E.E.T. over Greeley Street ...................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4 Naticook Brook ....................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.5
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford High School Exeter High School – William
    BEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL From the Intersection of Route 114 and Route 101 in Bedford • Follow Route 101 West to the blinking yellow light. • Turn left onto Nashua Road. • Bedford High School will be approximately 1/4 mile on your right. EXETER HIGH SCHOOL – WILLIAM BALL STADIUM 1 Blue Hawk Drive (for GPS use 315 Epping Road) • From North/West (Manchester Area) Route 101 East to Exit 8, Brentwood. At the top of the ramp turn left. Go over overpass to stop sign. At stop sign, turn right onto Route 27E/Epping Road. High School Entrance is 1.2 miles down on the left. Stadium is located behind the school. • From East (Portsmouth Area) Route 101 West to Exit 9, Route 27 Exeter. At the top of the ramp turn right. High School entrance will be a few miles down on right. Stadium is located behind the school. DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, HANOVER, NH From the Boston area (~2.5 hours): • Take I-93 north to I-89 north at Concord, N.H. • Get off I-89 at Exit 18 in Lebanon, N.H. onto Route 120. (A sign says that it is the exit for Dartmouth College.) • Bear right off the exit, heading north on Rt.120 into Hanover. • 4.1 miles from the exit, Rt. 120 forks at a traffic light. • Bear right at the fork, following Rt. 120 one-half mile on South Park Street to the second traffic light. • Turn left at the light, onto East Wheelock Street. • Follow East Wheelock for two-tenths of a mile, when you will come to the Hopkins Center (left) and the Dartmouth Green (right).
    [Show full text]
  • Fe Everett Turnpike
    Congestion Management Report F.E. EVERETT TURNPIKE (SOUTH), NASHUA Segment Length: 6.7 miles Number of Traffic Signals: 0 Daily Traffic Volumes: 60, 000-69,000 Number of travel lanes: 6-8 Analysis Period: June 2015 Roadway Class: I (Principal Arterial — Other Freeways and Expressways) The F.E. Everett Turnpike serves as one of the primary north- attractions, including the Pheasant Lane Mall, downtown south thoroughfares in southern New Hampshire for Nashua, and the commercial corridors along NH 101A and vehicular traffic by connecting the state’s three largest the Daniel Webster Highway. cities: Manchester, Nashua and Concord. Since the Turnpike runs 44 miles from the Massachusetts border to Concord, Due to its role as a commuting corridor, the F.E. Everett the portion within the Nashua Region was divided into 3 Turnpike is expected to have some degree of congestion segments (North from Exit 13 to 10, Middle from Exit 10 to during peak travel times. In addition to the high volume of 7, and South from Exit 7 to the Massachusetts State line) in cars at certain peak travel times, contributors to this order to comprehensively study congestion during peak congestion are segments where travel lanes vary from two to periods. three lanes in either direction, and toll plazas, which require drivers to slow their speed. The Southern segment is located entirely within Nashua and extends from Interchange 7 (NH 101A/Amherst St) to the The Turnpike is operated by the New Hampshire Department Massachusetts state border. This segment of the Everett of Transportation’s Bureau of Turnpikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua Developers Showcase
    Nashua Developers Showcase June 4, 2015 Nashua Office of Economic Development Nashua Business & Industrial Development Authority PROJECT SNAPSHOTS Nashua Developers Showcase 1 Nashua Developers Showcase www.nashuadares.com 2 TOOLS FOR SUCCESS Nashua Developers Showcase Nashua’s location, high quality of life, low crime rate and skilled workforce are certainly noteworthy. Similarly, New Hampshire enjoys a reputation as a place that’s easy to do business. Where we really shine is the personal touch that the Nashua and New Hampshire team will provide you through every step of your investment. We offer financial resources and assistance that are designed to help you grow and thrive. We’d be happy to discuss these in greater detail so that they can be structured in a way to enable your project to launch successfully. 3 Nashua Developers Showcase 4 www.nashuadares.com 2 EAST SPIT BROOK ROAD ABUNDANT LAND IN THE HEART OF THE CITY’S RETAIL DISTRICT A Retailer’s Dream 2 East Spit Brook Road is easily accessible from Route 3 (Everett Turnpike) via Exit 1 (Spit Brook Road) and Exit 2 (Circumferential Highway). Daniel Webster Highway is the common frontage for a large majority of retail businesses and is one of the most sought after retail destinations in New England. This site provides perhaps the last large opportunity for significant retail development in the core of South Nashua. The site also overlooks the Merrimack River. UNDER Infrastructure Investments Exit 36 South: The City is working collaboratively with the Town of AGREEMENT Tyngsborough, MA and the Nashua Regional Planning Commission to develop a strategy to establish a southbound exit for this critical access point.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate System Toll Roads in the United States (In Operation As of January 1, 2017) Table T-1, Part 3
    INTERSTATE SYSTEM TOLL ROADS IN THE UNITED STATES (IN OPERATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2017) TABLE T-1, PART 3 HPMS Financing or State Name of Facility Toll ID Operating Authority California I-15 Value Pricing Project 16 San Diego Assoc of Gov; CA Dept of Trans California I-680 SMART Carpool Lanes 297 Alameda County Congestion Management Agency California I-880 / SR 237 Express Connector 298 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority California I-110 Express Lanes 313 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority California I-10 Express Lanes 338 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Colorado HOV/Tolled Express Lanes 24 Plenary Roads Denver Colorado I-70 Eastbound Mountain Express Lane 258 High Performance Transportation Enterprise Colorado I-25 North to 120th Ave. 259 High Performance Transportation Enterprise Delaware John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway (Delaware Turnpike) 28 DE Dept of Trans Delaware John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway (Delaware Turnpike) 28 DE Dept of Trans Florida Alligator Alley (Everglades Parkway) 44 FL Dept of Transportation Florida I-95 Express 302 FL Dept of Transportation Florida I-595 Express 340 FL Dept of Transportation I 595 Express, LLC Georgia I-85 Express Lanes 360 State Road and Tollway Authority (SRTA) Illinois Ronald Reagan Memorial Tollway 72 IL State Toll Highway Authority Illinois Ronald Reagan Memorial Tollway 72 IL State Toll Highway Authority Illinois Veterans Memorial Tollway 73 IL State Toll Highway Authority Length 1/ Interstate From To Miles Kilometers Rural/Urban Route SR 56/ Ted Williams Pkwy SR 52 8.00 12.87 Urban 15 SR 84/ Pleasanton SR 237 Milpitas 14.00 22.53 Urban 680 I-880 SR 237 4.00 6.44 Urban 880 Harbor Gateway Transit Center Adams Blvd 11.00 17.70 Urban 110 Alameda St/Union Station I-605 14.00 22.53 Urban 10 20th Ave, downtown Denver US 36 and Kalamath St.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose and Need Report (Appendix G)
    PURPOSE AND NEED REPORT I-93 Transit Investment Study Submitted to: The New Hampshire Department of Transportation and Massachusetts Executive Offi ce of Transportation Submitted by: HNTB Corporation May 2007 New Hampshire Department of Transportation Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation I-93 Transit Investment Study Purpose and Need Report Prepared by In association with Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. Jacobs Edwards & Kelcey Fitzgerald & Halliday, Inc. May 2007 I-93 Transit Investment Study Purpose and Need Report Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... i List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables............................................................................................................................... iii I. Purpose and Need............................................................................................................... 1 A. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 B. Project Purpose .............................................................................................................. 1 C. Project Need.................................................................................................................... 1 D. Study Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Improvement Program
    Transportation Improvement Program FY 2021 – FY 2024 Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission Auburn, Bedford, Candia, Chester, Deerfield, Derry, Francestown, Goffstown, Hooksett, Londonderry, Manchester, New Boston, Weare, Windham DRAFT DRAFTJanuary 22, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 2. EFFECT OF TIP ON REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE .............. 4 2.1 Effect of the TIP on Regional Safety Performance ..................................................... 5 2.2 Effect of the TIP on Infrastructure Condition ............................................................ 8 2.3 Effect of the TIP on System Performance .................................................................. 10 2.4 Effect of the TIP on Transit Asset Management ....................................................... 12 2.5 Effect of the TIP on Carbon Monoxide Emissions ................................................... 15 3. REGIONAL PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS .......................................................... 17 4. AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ....................................................................................... 19 4.1 Transportation Conformity Requirements ............................................................... 19 4.2 Latest Planning Assumptions ..................................................................................... 20 4.3 Consultation Requirements .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fe Everett Turnpike Widening Feasibility Report
    F.E. EVERETT TURNPIKE WIDENING FEASIBILITY REPORT Feasibility of Widening the 2-Lane Segments of the Turnpike to 3-Lanes in Each Direction from Nashua to Bedford Prepared by: NH Department of Transportation Bureau of Highway Design & Bureau of Turnpikes November 2010 1 I. INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a study which evaluates the feasibility of widening the 2-lane segments of the F. E. Everett Turnpike (FEET) to 3-lanes in each direction from the Massachusetts/New Hampshire state line northerly to the Interstate 293 interchange in Bedford, a total distance of approximately 20 miles. Within these study limits the Turnpike passes through the communities of Nashua, Merrimack and Bedford. See Figure 1 for a graphic of the study area. The goal of the study is to evaluate the need for widening the narrow segments, identify pertinent issues and constraints, and estimate the cost of the potential improvements. The existing Turnpike is at least 3 lanes in each direction through virtually all of Nashua, and between Exit 10 and Exit 11 in Merrimack. It is also currently being widened to 3 lanes in each direction in the vicinity of the Manchester Airport Access Road (MAAR) interchange in northern Merrimack and southern Bedford. This leaves three segments of 2-lane highway: • Southern Segment – in Nashua and Merrimack between Exit 8 and Exit 10 • Middle Segment – in Merrimack between Exit 11 and the southern limit of work of the MAAR project • Northern Segment – in Bedford between the northern limit of work of the MAAR project and the I-293 interchange The locations of the three 2-lane segments are depicted on Figure 2.
    [Show full text]