DOCSLIB.ORG

Roadway Infrastructure Master Planning Study Merrimack, New Hampshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roadway Infrastructure Master Planning Study Merrimack, New Hampshire Roadway Infrastructure Master Planning Study Merrimack, New Hampshire Prepared For: Town of Merrimack, New Hampshire Community Development Department Prepared By: Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) Fay, Spofford & Thorndike April 2010 Acknowledgements Fay, Spofford & Thorndike Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) Acknowledgements The completion of this study would not have been possible without the direct active involvement of many individuals. Town of Merrimack, New Hampshire Walter Warren, Community Development Director Rick Seymour, Jr., Director Department of Public Works David Lent, Deputy Director, Department of Public Works Kyle Fox, PE, Operations Manager, Department of Public Works Nancy Larson, Planning and Zoning Administrator New Hampshire Department of Transportation, William Lambert, NHDOT Traffic Engineer/Administrator Subramanian Sharma, NHDOT Traffic Engineer Nashua Regional Planning Commission Ryan Friedmann, GIS Planner, Transportation Stephen Williams, former Director NRPC Fay, Spofford & Thorndike Peter. Howe, PE, Principal-in-Charge Gary Hebert, PE, PTOE, Project Manager David P. McNamara, PE, Project Civil Engineer Heather N. Ostertog, PE, Traffic Engineer Kevin Gagne, Senior Civil Engineer I-2 Fay, Spofford & Thorndike Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................................................................ES-1 I. INTRODUCTION The Setting .....................................................................................................................................................................................................I-1 Study Scope ..................................................................................................................................................................................................I-1 A. Identifying the range of projected development quantities in the development zones by the Town..............................I-3 B. Identifying the streets and intersections to be included in the traffic analysis areas ............................................................I-3 C. Assumptions regarding programmed roadway improvement projects Prior to 2017 and 2027.........................................I-5 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS I. 2007 Traffic Operations Analysis Criteria ....................................................................................................................................... II-1 II. 2007 Traffic Operations Findings ..................................................................................................................................................... II-3 III. Characteristics of Existing Key Intersections and Facilities ......................................................................................................... II-6 III. TRAFFIC MODEL TECHNICAL REPORT I. Background ...................................................................................................................................................................................... III-1 II. Model Structure................................................................................................................................................................................ III-1 A. Zones ....................................................................................................................................................................................... III-1 B. Roads....................................................................................................................................................................................... III-2 C. Model Inputs........................................................................................................................................................................... III-4 i. Population Data ............................................................................................................................................................. III-4 ii. Employment Data .......................................................................................................................................................... III-4 iii. Externals ........................................................................................................................................................................... III-7 III. Model Calibration............................................................................................................................................................................ III-7 A. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................... III-7 B. Calibration Targets .............................................................................................................................................................. III-11 Contents - i Fay, Spofford & Thorndike Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) IV. TRAFFIC FORECASTS I. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................................ IV-1 II. FOCUS PARCELS .............................................................................................................................................................................. IV-1 A. LOCATIONS............................................................................................................................................................................ IV-1 B. PHASING................................................................................................................................................................................. IV-2 C. MODEL DATA......................................................................................................................................................................... IV-2 PARCEL A – SOUTHWOOD................................................................................................................................................... IV-3 PARCEL B – EDGEBROOK HEIGHTS ..................................................................................................................................... IV-4 PARCEL D – BAE SYSTEMS..................................................................................................................................................... IV-4 PARCEL E – NASHUA CORP. ................................................................................................................................................ IV-5 PARCEL F – ANHEUSER-BUSCH ............................................................................................................................................ IV-6 PARCEL G – KOLLSMAN ....................................................................................................................................................... IV-6 PARCEL H – FLATLEY.............................................................................................................................................................. IV-7 D. MERRIMACK PREMIUM OUTLETS.......................................................................................................................................... IV-7 III. TOWNWIDE TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................................................... IV-8 A. 2017 SCENARIO..................................................................................................................................................................... IV-8 B. 2027 SCENARIO................................................................................................................................................................... IV-11 IV. INTERSECTION TRAFFIC SHARES ................................................................................................................................................... IV-19 DANIEL WEBSTER HIGHWAY @ MANCHESTER STREET ..................................................................................................... IV-20 DANIEL WEBSTER HIGHWAY @ INDUSTRIAL DRIVE........................................................................................................... IV-21 DANIEL WEBSTER HIGHWAY @ GREELEY STREET .............................................................................................................. IV-22 DANIEL WEBSTER HIGHWAY @ BABOOSIC LAKE ROAD ................................................................................................. IV-23 CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD @ AMHERST STREET/CAMP SARGENT ROAD................................................................... IV-24 V. SHORT AND LONG RANGE INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS I. Infrastructure Analysis Approach 2017 and 2027 ....................................................................................................................... V-1 II. Projected Merrimack 2017 and 2027 Conditions........................................................................................................................ V-2 Contents - ii Fay, Spofford & Thorndike Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M a S S a C H U S E T T S EXISTING ITS DEVICES in DISTRICT 5 and TURNPIKES October 1, 2021
    Installed ITS Devices Roadways MAP E CCTV )" Patrol Sheds Interstate 89 DMS Interstate 93 MVDS Interstate 293 " VSL Interstate 393 Existing Devices District 5 & Turnpikes Everett Turnpike October 1, 2021 RWIS NH 101 0 2.25 4.5 9 US Routes Miles State Routes LACONIA BROOKFIELD DANBURY HILL SANBORNTON GILFORD 28A SPRINGFIELD DISTRICT 2 «¬ «¬106 DISTRICT 3 MIDDLETON TILTON BELMONT WILMOT 93 ALTON 11 NEW DURHAM ANDOVER FRANKLIN ¨¦§ «¬ 11 GILMANTON «¬140 MILTON «¬ ¤£4 NORTHFIELD NEW LONDON 103A SALISBURY «¬ FARMINGTON CANTERBURY BARNSTEAD SUTTON «¬129 «¬127 BOSCAWEN LOUDON NEWBURY «¬132 2 WEBSTER 103 PITTSFIELD T «¬ STRAFFORD C I 126 WARNER R ¤£3 «¬ T 89 CHICHESTER S ¨¦§ I 93 ¨¦§ 4 D CONCORD ¤£ BRADFORD EPSOM NORTHWOOD HOPKINTON WASHINGTON DISTRICT 6 202 PEMBROKE HENNIKER ¤£ HILLSBOROUGH «¬43 ALLENSTOWN 152 BOW DEERFIELD «¬ WINDSOR NOTTINGHAM DUNBARTON DEERING WEARE 156 «¬149 «¬77 HOOKSETT «¬ CANDIA ANTRIM EPPING 101 «¬ RAYMOND 101 GOFFSTOWN «¬ BENNINGTON «¬47 FRANCESTOWN 136 114A 293 «¬ «¬ ¨¦§ «¬28A AUBURN FREMONT HANCOCK NEW BOSTON BRENTWOOD MANCHESTER CHESTER GREENFIELD 13 «¬ 102 BEDFORD «¬ SANDOWN DISTRICT 4 121 DANVILLE 28B «¬ 6 «¬ T LYNDEBOROUGH C DUBLIN MONT VERNON I R 111 137 PETERBOROUGH 31 DERRY ¬ T «¬ «¬ « LONDONDERRY HAMPSTEAD S AMHERST I D MERRIMACK 28 NEWTON LITCHFIELD 128 «¬ «¬ ATKINSON WILTON JAFFREY TEMPLE SHARON MILFORD 3A «¬ WINDHAM 123 45 «¬ «¬ 101A «¬ SALEM 122 HUDSON «¬ FEE ¬ 111 GREENVILLE « «¬ HOLLIS RINDGE NEW IPSWICH MASON BROOKLINE NASHUA «¬38 ¬130 PELHAM 1«¬23A « M A S S A C H U S E T T S EXISTING ITS DEVICES IN DISTRICT 5 AND TURNPIKES October 1, 2021 DIRECTION OF MILE DEVICE NAME CITY/TOWN ROUTE LOCATION DESCRIPTION TRAVEL MARKER NH Route 101 Eastbound slope of the Meetinghouse RD/US 101 E 53.8 CCTV AX 5 Bedford NH 101 Eastbound 53.8 Route 3 intersection between US 3 and the Route 101 Eastbound on ramp.
    [Show full text]
  • Purpose and Need Environmental Assessment Improvements to I-293 (FE Everett Turnpike), Exit 6 & 7 (Manchester 16099)
    Purpose and Need Environmental Assessment Improvements to I-293 (FE Everett Turnpike), Exit 6 & 7 (Manchester 16099) The draft Purpose and Need outlined here is intended to describe and support the Environmental Assessment which is being developed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Purpose and Need helps to establish the basis for the development of alternatives, and is used to compare the effectiveness and the impacts of the Proposed Action against the No Action Alternative. The Purpose and Need statement is fundamental to the analysis of a project under NEPA, the Clean Water Act (Section 404), and other environmental regulations. Purpose The purpose of this project is to address capacity, safety, and access related deficiencies along a 3.5-mile portion of Interstate 293 (FE Everett Turnpike) in Manchester, New Hampshire, beginning north of Exit 5 (Granite Street) and ending north of Exit 7 (Front Street) by: • Correcting geometric and safety deficiencies while reducing congestion at problem locations within the Study Area; • Accommodating future traffic growth related to commuter trips and the transportation of commercial goods and services through the corridor; and • Improving access to the highway consistent with the long-term vision of the communities of Manchester and Goffstown. Need Interstate 293 (FE Everett Turnpike) is a north-south toll highway in central-southern New Hampshire which serves as a major transportation corridor linking the state capitol of Concord to the residential, industrial, and commercial centers in Manchester, Nashua, and north-central Massachusetts. Interstate 293 connects other regional highways including I-93, US 3, and NH 101 and serves as a major route for commuters and commercial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • NRPC White Paper on the Nashua-Hudson Circumferential
    NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CIRCUMFERENTIAL HIGHWAY “WHITE PAPER” September 17, 2003 NASHUA REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION CIRCUMFERENTIAL HIGHWAY “WHITE PAPER” September 17, 2003 INTRODUCTION The Nashua Regional Planning Commission is currently evaluating the proposed Hudson-Nashua Circumferential Highway project. Due to a number of factors, NRPC feels that it is prudent for the affected municipalities (Hudson, Litchfield, Merrimack and Nashua) and the general public to take a step back and reassess to this project. 1) The project has been moved out of the first ten years of the State’s Ten Year Transportation Improvement Plan (“Ten Year Plan”) due to state transportation funding constraints. 2) The most expensive part of the project is the portion that connects Route 3/DW Highway in Merrimack with the Everett Turnpike (which is within the Pennichuck Watershed). 3) Political support for the project is unclear. 4) The permitting process has been long and ongoing, and is not resulting in closure on this controversial project. 5) The project as proposed is likely to hit stiff opposition from environmental groups and from communities within the Pennichuck Brook Watershed, as a portion of the highway will be built within that watershed. 6) Central Hudson and downtown Nashua continue to experience significant traffic congestion, and a viable relief is needed. 7) There have been major changes to the region’s transportation plans since the project was originally conceived. 8) The NHDOT has acquired right-of-way for the partial build, and Hudson, Litchfield and Merrimack have included the alignment in their master plans. Development proposals are required to accommodate the right-of-way.
    [Show full text]
  • High School Directions
    All sports are played at the site of the school unless otherwise listed. Updated 8/27/13 Belmont High School 255 Seavey Road Belmont, NH 03220 267-6525 From East: Route 128 to Route 11 in Alton, watch for junction of Route 140 to Gilmanton on left. Stay on Route 140 going across Route 107 and Route 106. At stop sign crossing Route 106 turn right onto Main Street. Watch for School Street on left. School is straight ahead. From West: Route 11 through Franklin and Tilton, at McDonald’s turn right onto Route 140, go about 5 miles to stop sign. Turn right onto Main Street then turn left onto School Street. School is straight ahead. From North: Take Exit 20 off I-93. At lights, turn left. Take next right onto Route 140. Go approx. 5 miles. At stop sign turn right onto Main Street. Watch for School Street on left. School is straight ahead. From South: See directions for North. Golf Canterbury Woods 15 West Road Exit 18 Route 93 left off exit left at fork up hill left into course drive - 1 mile from Route 93 Berlin High School 550 Willard Street, Berlin, NH 03570 752-4152 From Interstate 93 North Take Rte. 93 North to Exit 35 onto Rte. 3 and into Twin Mountain. Come to a stoplight. Go through the light, which keeps you on Rte. 3, and go approximately 2 miles. Take a right onto Rte. 115 (at the blinking amber light). Follow Rte. 115 to its end and take a right onto Rte.
    [Show full text]
  • SNHPC Draft Congestion Management Process
    Southern New Hampshire ABSTRACT Planning Commission Utilizing travel time data from thousands of drivers, this report identifies varying levels of congestion along roadways, their CONGESTION causes, and recommends strategies to mitigate existing and future MANAGEMENT congested conditions. PROCESS DRAFT October 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................3 1.1 The SNHPC’s Role in Congestion Management ..................................................................................3 1.2 Requirements of a CMP ....................................................................................................................4 2.0 Overview of the CMP Process .......................................................................................................................6 3.0 Regional Objectives for CMP in the SNHPC Region ......................................................................................7 4.0 Definition of the SNHPC Regional CMP Network ...................................................................................... 10 5.0 Definition of Performance Measures ......................................................................................................... 12 6.0 Data and Monitoring of System Performance ........................................................................................... 13 6.1 Travel Time Index (TTI) Thresholds to Quantify Congestion ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Master Plan Update, Merrimack NH
    Merrimack, NH | 2013 Master Plan Update 9. Transportation 9.1 Introduction The Master Plan Update 2002 identified several critical areas of concern relative to existing congestion, transportation deficiencies, and the lack of connectivity within the Town. In addi- tion, the need to create a long-term transportation plan that accommodates mobility within the community for its residents, businesses and visitors and promotes development consis- tent with the Town’s vision was also identified. Key recommended actions from the 2002 report are summarized below with an update on the progress completed to date. Continue to work with the state and regional officials toward implementation of the Manchester Airport Access Road (MAAR) to improve access to the Manchester Airport for Merrimack residents and businesses while also improving access to northern Merrimack’s commercial and industrial areas to the F.E. Everett Turnpike. The MAAR, now formally named Raymond Wieczorek Drive, was completed and opened for public travel in the fall of 2011. The new interchange provides full north and south access between the F.E. Everett Turnpike and US Route 3 in Bedford, just north of the Merrimack town line. This interchange partially filled a gap in the regional transportation system for northern Merrimack residents and businesses where the existing F.E. Everett Turnpike Exit 12 configuration only provides ramps to/from the south. Previously motorists in the northern portion of the Town wishing to travel to/from the Turnpike north would have to travel via US Route 3 to the I-293/NH Route 101 interchange in Bedford to complete this trip or travel south to the Exit 11 interchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Design Report
    Prepared For: F.E. Everett Turnpike Widening Project Nashua, Merrimack and Bedford, NH DRAFT Environmental Study Prepared By: State Project No. 13761 53 Regional Drive Concord, NH 03301 August 2018 Nashua-Merrimack-Bedford 13761 Environmental Study Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Lead Federal Agency ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Need Statement .................................................................................................. 1-2 2 Alternatives ....................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Mainline Turnpike ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Pennichuck Brook ..................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 F.E.E.T. over Greeley Street ...................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4 Naticook Brook ....................................................................................................................... 2-10 2.5
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Master Plan Update, Merrimack NH
    Merrimack, NH | 2013 Master Plan Update 2. Land Use and Community Design 2.1 Introduction An understanding of the Merrimack’s historic and existing land use patterns, regulations, growth trends, natural resources, and infrastructure is useful in identifying opportunities and constraints to future development potential of the Town. Land use within a community is represented by the historic pattern of residential, commercial, industrial, municipal and insti- tutional development, interspersed with what is generally considered as open space, such as forests and natural features, undeveloped land, agriculture and parks and recreational areas. The evolution of land use within a community is the product of local economic conditions and community preferences; growth and development is based on such factors as access to jobs, employment, and the availability of affordable land for new housing or commercial development. Community preferences, expressed as land use plans and regulations, dictate the use, form, location, and sometimes the pace, of new development. Land use forms the basis for master planning and determines, to a large extent, a Town’s need to provide public facilities and infrastructure, transportation networks and services, and protection of environ- mental resources. As communities plan for their future, determining how and where growth and development should occur will provide the basis for planning where investments for municipal services will be needed, as well as determining what controls will be necessary to protect areas of the Town from unwanted development. Communities have the ability to control land use and development patterns through a variety of mechanisms, including zoning and subdivision regulations, provision of public utilities and infrastructure, and protection of open space lands through direct purchase and the acquisition or acceptance of conservation restrictions/easements.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedford High School Exeter High School – William
    BEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL From the Intersection of Route 114 and Route 101 in Bedford • Follow Route 101 West to the blinking yellow light. • Turn left onto Nashua Road. • Bedford High School will be approximately 1/4 mile on your right. EXETER HIGH SCHOOL – WILLIAM BALL STADIUM 1 Blue Hawk Drive (for GPS use 315 Epping Road) • From North/West (Manchester Area) Route 101 East to Exit 8, Brentwood. At the top of the ramp turn left. Go over overpass to stop sign. At stop sign, turn right onto Route 27E/Epping Road. High School Entrance is 1.2 miles down on the left. Stadium is located behind the school. • From East (Portsmouth Area) Route 101 West to Exit 9, Route 27 Exeter. At the top of the ramp turn right. High School entrance will be a few miles down on right. Stadium is located behind the school. DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, HANOVER, NH From the Boston area (~2.5 hours): • Take I-93 north to I-89 north at Concord, N.H. • Get off I-89 at Exit 18 in Lebanon, N.H. onto Route 120. (A sign says that it is the exit for Dartmouth College.) • Bear right off the exit, heading north on Rt.120 into Hanover. • 4.1 miles from the exit, Rt. 120 forks at a traffic light. • Bear right at the fork, following Rt. 120 one-half mile on South Park Street to the second traffic light. • Turn left at the light, onto East Wheelock Street. • Follow East Wheelock for two-tenths of a mile, when you will come to the Hopkins Center (left) and the Dartmouth Green (right).
    [Show full text]
  • Fe Everett Turnpike
    Congestion Management Report F.E. EVERETT TURNPIKE (SOUTH), NASHUA Segment Length: 6.7 miles Number of Traffic Signals: 0 Daily Traffic Volumes: 60, 000-69,000 Number of travel lanes: 6-8 Analysis Period: June 2015 Roadway Class: I (Principal Arterial — Other Freeways and Expressways) The F.E. Everett Turnpike serves as one of the primary north- attractions, including the Pheasant Lane Mall, downtown south thoroughfares in southern New Hampshire for Nashua, and the commercial corridors along NH 101A and vehicular traffic by connecting the state’s three largest the Daniel Webster Highway. cities: Manchester, Nashua and Concord. Since the Turnpike runs 44 miles from the Massachusetts border to Concord, Due to its role as a commuting corridor, the F.E. Everett the portion within the Nashua Region was divided into 3 Turnpike is expected to have some degree of congestion segments (North from Exit 13 to 10, Middle from Exit 10 to during peak travel times. In addition to the high volume of 7, and South from Exit 7 to the Massachusetts State line) in cars at certain peak travel times, contributors to this order to comprehensively study congestion during peak congestion are segments where travel lanes vary from two to periods. three lanes in either direction, and toll plazas, which require drivers to slow their speed. The Southern segment is located entirely within Nashua and extends from Interchange 7 (NH 101A/Amherst St) to the The Turnpike is operated by the New Hampshire Department Massachusetts state border. This segment of the Everett of Transportation’s Bureau of Turnpikes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nashua Developers Showcase
    Nashua Developers Showcase June 4, 2015 Nashua Office of Economic Development Nashua Business & Industrial Development Authority PROJECT SNAPSHOTS Nashua Developers Showcase 1 Nashua Developers Showcase www.nashuadares.com 2 TOOLS FOR SUCCESS Nashua Developers Showcase Nashua’s location, high quality of life, low crime rate and skilled workforce are certainly noteworthy. Similarly, New Hampshire enjoys a reputation as a place that’s easy to do business. Where we really shine is the personal touch that the Nashua and New Hampshire team will provide you through every step of your investment. We offer financial resources and assistance that are designed to help you grow and thrive. We’d be happy to discuss these in greater detail so that they can be structured in a way to enable your project to launch successfully. 3 Nashua Developers Showcase 4 www.nashuadares.com 2 EAST SPIT BROOK ROAD ABUNDANT LAND IN THE HEART OF THE CITY’S RETAIL DISTRICT A Retailer’s Dream 2 East Spit Brook Road is easily accessible from Route 3 (Everett Turnpike) via Exit 1 (Spit Brook Road) and Exit 2 (Circumferential Highway). Daniel Webster Highway is the common frontage for a large majority of retail businesses and is one of the most sought after retail destinations in New England. This site provides perhaps the last large opportunity for significant retail development in the core of South Nashua. The site also overlooks the Merrimack River. UNDER Infrastructure Investments Exit 36 South: The City is working collaboratively with the Town of AGREEMENT Tyngsborough, MA and the Nashua Regional Planning Commission to develop a strategy to establish a southbound exit for this critical access point.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate System Toll Roads in the United States (In Operation As of January 1, 2017) Table T-1, Part 3
    INTERSTATE SYSTEM TOLL ROADS IN THE UNITED STATES (IN OPERATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2017) TABLE T-1, PART 3 HPMS Financing or State Name of Facility Toll ID Operating Authority California I-15 Value Pricing Project 16 San Diego Assoc of Gov; CA Dept of Trans California I-680 SMART Carpool Lanes 297 Alameda County Congestion Management Agency California I-880 / SR 237 Express Connector 298 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority California I-110 Express Lanes 313 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority California I-10 Express Lanes 338 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Colorado HOV/Tolled Express Lanes 24 Plenary Roads Denver Colorado I-70 Eastbound Mountain Express Lane 258 High Performance Transportation Enterprise Colorado I-25 North to 120th Ave. 259 High Performance Transportation Enterprise Delaware John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway (Delaware Turnpike) 28 DE Dept of Trans Delaware John F. Kennedy Memorial Highway (Delaware Turnpike) 28 DE Dept of Trans Florida Alligator Alley (Everglades Parkway) 44 FL Dept of Transportation Florida I-95 Express 302 FL Dept of Transportation Florida I-595 Express 340 FL Dept of Transportation I 595 Express, LLC Georgia I-85 Express Lanes 360 State Road and Tollway Authority (SRTA) Illinois Ronald Reagan Memorial Tollway 72 IL State Toll Highway Authority Illinois Ronald Reagan Memorial Tollway 72 IL State Toll Highway Authority Illinois Veterans Memorial Tollway 73 IL State Toll Highway Authority Length 1/ Interstate From To Miles Kilometers Rural/Urban Route SR 56/ Ted Williams Pkwy SR 52 8.00 12.87 Urban 15 SR 84/ Pleasanton SR 237 Milpitas 14.00 22.53 Urban 680 I-880 SR 237 4.00 6.44 Urban 880 Harbor Gateway Transit Center Adams Blvd 11.00 17.70 Urban 110 Alameda St/Union Station I-605 14.00 22.53 Urban 10 20th Ave, downtown Denver US 36 and Kalamath St.
    [Show full text]