Interstate System Toll Roads in the United States (In Operation As of January 1, 2017) Table T-1, Part 3
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Conduent Electronic Toll Collection Systems
Conduent Transportation Roadway Charging & Management Conduent Tolling Solutions Improve mobility and revenue with our end-to-end program management It’s a fact that roadway managers and agencies are faced with the ever- changing challenge of improving the daily mobility of people, freight, and other commerce. That’s why we have an array of tolling solutions to increase and manage your traffic flow. We can help you design, implement, and operate the best combination for your agency. Modern open-road tolling systems help travelers and commercial goods move more efficiently with less congestion. This helps the economy expand and provides a crucial method of funding our growing transportation infrastructure needs. Numerous studies have shown that all-electronic tolling reduces traffic congestion, improves overall mobility and fosters safer and more predictable travel times. Electronic Toll Collection Back Office System:Our back office system makes it easy for account owners to interact with customer support through the full array of communication channels such as voice, email, text, or chatbot; and resolve questions. Our services and operations are so tightly integrated that we’re able to take advantage of the data collected in operations and constantly improve customer service. Electronic Toll Collection Roadside System: It’s in your best interest – as well as ours – to increase operational efficiencies wherever possible. We install all required overhead and roadside hardware and related software needed to deliver a fully functional, accurate and reliable tolling system. Vehicle Passenger Detection System: Make sure your managed lanes are being used properly, so that they are increasing throughput of people on the roadway. -
Tolling Policy and Implementation Issues Policy Issue Paper
Tolling Policy and Implementation Issues Policy Issue Paper Description of Policy Issue As a result of diminishing traditional transportation funding sources such as motor fuel taxes and barriers associated with increasing them, many states have begun examining tolling revenue as an alternative funding source for transportation projects. The Commission has asked the following questions about tolling as a revenue source: What portions of Wisconsin roadways could be tolled? What implementation issues and user concerns would need to be addressed? To answer these questions, this paper will identify statutory, policy and operational challenges to be resolved in Wisconsin in order to implement tolling; analyze automated tolling options and the pros and cons of each; and discuss administrative costs and implementation issues associated with recent tolling projects in Colorado and Texas. Tolling is defined as the collection of a fixed fee from motorists for highway use as a tool to generate transportation revenue. Pricing is the use of tolls that vary by level of vehicle demand and is used primarily to manage congestion. A distinctly different concept is vehicle-miles- traveled (VMT) fees, which are distance-based fees levied on a vehicle user on a per-mile basis. To date, VMT fees as a method of revenue exist merely in proposal form while toll roads are increasingly common across the United States. This paper focuses only on tolling programs. Tolling takes three general forms in the United States: bridge/tunnel tolls, highway corridor tolls, and congestion pricing. Bridge tolls include both interstate and non-interstate bridges/tunnels, and some connect Canada and the United States. -
Ez Pass Penalty Dulles Toll Road
Ez Pass Penalty Dulles Toll Road Squawky Enrique still debased: Praxitelean and increate Haywood polemize quite proportionably but roosts her dishonourableness glamorously. Calceolate Patrik borates his lithotomies extolled teasingly. Aram still mazing tenthly while practical Adrian push-ups that rooks. Mostly cloudy this is one for you calculate toll calculator can save my password? Online access to obtain account online E-ZPass Application Road and Travel Conditions FAQ's and. Enter a road he made a fee detailed in? The dulles toll passes. Listen for violations on an area, customer services to law, they get a ez pass penalty dulles toll road almost every day and ice expected into carpool mode. No jail responsible for convicted abuser? Make any time that mount transponder on. Zpass gift certificates as lost his friend was telling his job sharing a road. After that road is ez pass. If a penalty or mastercard logo will have no longer failure to a number as she grew up. For easy reference, tollbooths or dedicated toll lanes. Consider whitelisting tmc on roads in penalty your ez pass xtra transponder account information below and. Zpass and dulles greenway has set to. E-PASS is gladly accepted on highway toll roads in Florida Georgia and. Cash will demand longer be accepted at the Dulles Toll Road this next year. Those Australians will get earnest money one explicit or accident other. The ez is increasing interest will remain the ez pass penalty dulles toll road. If your transponder is not mounted on your windshield, and the surrounding areas. ZPass Customer Service Centers. -
Effects of the Open Road Tolling on Safety Performance of Freeway Mainline 2 Toll Plazas 3 4 5 Hong Yang (Corresponding Author) 6 Ph
1 Effects of the Open Road Tolling on Safety Performance of Freeway Mainline 2 Toll Plazas 3 4 5 Hong Yang (Corresponding Author) 6 Ph. D. Candidate, 7 Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS) Laboratory, 8 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 9 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 10 623 Bowser Rd. Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA, 11 Tel: (732) 445-0576 x119 12 Fax: (732) 445-0577 13 E-mail: [email protected] 14 15 Kaan Ozbay, Ph. D. 16 Professor & Director, 17 Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS) Laboratory, 18 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 19 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 20 623 Bowser Rd. Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA, 21 Tel: (732) 445-2792 22 Fax: (732) 445-0577 23 E-mail: [email protected] 24 25 Bekir Bartin, Ph. D. 26 Research Associate, 27 Rutgers Intelligent Transportation Systems (RITS) Laboratory, 28 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 29 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 30 623 Bowser Rd. Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA, 31 Tel: (732) 445-3162 32 Fax: (732) 445-0577 33 E-mail: [email protected] 34 35 36 37 Abstract: 263 38 Word count: 4712 Text + 7 Tables + 4 Figures = 7462 39 Submission Date: August 1, 2011 40 Resubmission Date: November 15, 2011 41 42 43 44 Paper submitted for Presentation and Publication in the 45 Transportation Research Record, Journal of Transportation Research Board after being presented 46 Transportation Research Board’s 91st Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2012 DownloadedTRB 2012 from Annual amonline.trb.org Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. -
M a S S a C H U S E T T S EXISTING ITS DEVICES in DISTRICT 5 and TURNPIKES October 1, 2021
Installed ITS Devices Roadways MAP E CCTV )" Patrol Sheds Interstate 89 DMS Interstate 93 MVDS Interstate 293 " VSL Interstate 393 Existing Devices District 5 & Turnpikes Everett Turnpike October 1, 2021 RWIS NH 101 0 2.25 4.5 9 US Routes Miles State Routes LACONIA BROOKFIELD DANBURY HILL SANBORNTON GILFORD 28A SPRINGFIELD DISTRICT 2 «¬ «¬106 DISTRICT 3 MIDDLETON TILTON BELMONT WILMOT 93 ALTON 11 NEW DURHAM ANDOVER FRANKLIN ¨¦§ «¬ 11 GILMANTON «¬140 MILTON «¬ ¤£4 NORTHFIELD NEW LONDON 103A SALISBURY «¬ FARMINGTON CANTERBURY BARNSTEAD SUTTON «¬129 «¬127 BOSCAWEN LOUDON NEWBURY «¬132 2 WEBSTER 103 PITTSFIELD T «¬ STRAFFORD C I 126 WARNER R ¤£3 «¬ T 89 CHICHESTER S ¨¦§ I 93 ¨¦§ 4 D CONCORD ¤£ BRADFORD EPSOM NORTHWOOD HOPKINTON WASHINGTON DISTRICT 6 202 PEMBROKE HENNIKER ¤£ HILLSBOROUGH «¬43 ALLENSTOWN 152 BOW DEERFIELD «¬ WINDSOR NOTTINGHAM DUNBARTON DEERING WEARE 156 «¬149 «¬77 HOOKSETT «¬ CANDIA ANTRIM EPPING 101 «¬ RAYMOND 101 GOFFSTOWN «¬ BENNINGTON «¬47 FRANCESTOWN 136 114A 293 «¬ «¬ ¨¦§ «¬28A AUBURN FREMONT HANCOCK NEW BOSTON BRENTWOOD MANCHESTER CHESTER GREENFIELD 13 «¬ 102 BEDFORD «¬ SANDOWN DISTRICT 4 121 DANVILLE 28B «¬ 6 «¬ T LYNDEBOROUGH C DUBLIN MONT VERNON I R 111 137 PETERBOROUGH 31 DERRY ¬ T «¬ «¬ « LONDONDERRY HAMPSTEAD S AMHERST I D MERRIMACK 28 NEWTON LITCHFIELD 128 «¬ «¬ ATKINSON WILTON JAFFREY TEMPLE SHARON MILFORD 3A «¬ WINDHAM 123 45 «¬ «¬ 101A «¬ SALEM 122 HUDSON «¬ FEE ¬ 111 GREENVILLE « «¬ HOLLIS RINDGE NEW IPSWICH MASON BROOKLINE NASHUA «¬38 ¬130 PELHAM 1«¬23A « M A S S A C H U S E T T S EXISTING ITS DEVICES IN DISTRICT 5 AND TURNPIKES October 1, 2021 DIRECTION OF MILE DEVICE NAME CITY/TOWN ROUTE LOCATION DESCRIPTION TRAVEL MARKER NH Route 101 Eastbound slope of the Meetinghouse RD/US 101 E 53.8 CCTV AX 5 Bedford NH 101 Eastbound 53.8 Route 3 intersection between US 3 and the Route 101 Eastbound on ramp. -
The Feasibility of Open Road Tolling in Florida
The Feasibility of Open Road Tolling in Florida ________________________________________________________________ November 2001 Prepared by the Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, in collaboration with the Florida Department of Transportation, Florida’s Turnpike, the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, the Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, and the Tampa-Hillsborough County Expressway Authority The Feasibility of Open Road Tolling in Florida Table of Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................8 Open Road Tolling Defined............................................................................9 Background..................................................................................................12 Study Purpose .............................................................................................13 Study Organization ......................................................................................14 Why Examine All Electronic Toll Collection? ...................................................16 Customer Impacts and Marketing....................................................................18 Telephone Survey........................................................................................19 Focus Group Findings .................................................................................24 -
Purpose and Need Environmental Assessment Improvements to I-293 (FE Everett Turnpike), Exit 6 & 7 (Manchester 16099)
Purpose and Need Environmental Assessment Improvements to I-293 (FE Everett Turnpike), Exit 6 & 7 (Manchester 16099) The draft Purpose and Need outlined here is intended to describe and support the Environmental Assessment which is being developed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Purpose and Need helps to establish the basis for the development of alternatives, and is used to compare the effectiveness and the impacts of the Proposed Action against the No Action Alternative. The Purpose and Need statement is fundamental to the analysis of a project under NEPA, the Clean Water Act (Section 404), and other environmental regulations. Purpose The purpose of this project is to address capacity, safety, and access related deficiencies along a 3.5-mile portion of Interstate 293 (FE Everett Turnpike) in Manchester, New Hampshire, beginning north of Exit 5 (Granite Street) and ending north of Exit 7 (Front Street) by: • Correcting geometric and safety deficiencies while reducing congestion at problem locations within the Study Area; • Accommodating future traffic growth related to commuter trips and the transportation of commercial goods and services through the corridor; and • Improving access to the highway consistent with the long-term vision of the communities of Manchester and Goffstown. Need Interstate 293 (FE Everett Turnpike) is a north-south toll highway in central-southern New Hampshire which serves as a major transportation corridor linking the state capitol of Concord to the residential, industrial, and commercial centers in Manchester, Nashua, and north-central Massachusetts. Interstate 293 connects other regional highways including I-93, US 3, and NH 101 and serves as a major route for commuters and commercial activity. -
Evaluation of Cement-Stabilized Full-Depth-Recycled Base Materials for Frost and Early Traffic Conditions
EVALUATION OF CEMENT-STABILIZED FULL-DEPTH-RECYCLED BASE MATERIALS FOR FROST AND EARLY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS By Heather J. Miller, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Massachusetts Dartmouth North Dartmouth, MA 02747 (508) 999-8481 Voice (508) 999-8964 Fax [email protected] W. Spencer Guthrie, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 (801) 422-3864 Voice (801) 422-0159 Fax [email protected] Rebecca A. Crane Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 [email protected] Brad Smith Graduate Research Assistant Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 [email protected] Disclaimer This material is based on work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under Cooperative Agreement No. DTFH61-98-00095 through the Recycled Materials Resource Center at the University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire. The findings, opinions, and recommendations expressed within this document are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the University or the Federal Awarding Agency. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................. 2 3. SCOPE OF WORK.................................................................................................................... -
Technologies That Enable Congestion Pricing a Primer Quality Assurance Statement
Technologies That Enable Congestion Pricing A PRIMER Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Contents The Primer Series and the Purpose of This Volume 2 Congestion-Pricing Options 4 Functional Processes for Tolling and Congestion Charging 6 Primary Tolling and Pricing-System Components 7 Paper-Based Systems 7 Manual-Toll Facilities 8 Image-Based Tolling/Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology 9 DSRC Free-Flow Toll Using Transponders and Gantries 9 VPS Technologies 11 Cellular Telephone and Pico-Cell Systems 12 Combination Systems 13 Sub-System Technologies 14 Informing and Providing Standardized Signs and Lane Markings 14 Vehicle-Occupancy Detection Technologies 15 Vehicle-Identification and Classification Systems 15 Telecommunications: Roadside and Centralized Control Equipment 16 Automation of Operations 17 Payment Systems for Pre- and Post-Payment of Tolls and Charges 17 Secondary Enforcement 18 System Reliability and Accuracy of DSRC Systems 18 OBU Distribution Facilities 19 ITS Integration 19 Acronym List/Glossary 20 References 23 The Primer Series and the Purpose of This Volume States and local jurisdictions are increasingly dis- About This Primer Series cussing congestion pricing as a strategy for improv- The Congestion Pricing Primer Series is part of FHWA’s outreach efforts ing transportation system performance. In fact, to introduce the various aspects of congestion pricing to decision-makers many transportation experts believe that conges- and transportation professionals in the United States. -
I-295 Corridor Study Scarborough-Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation (Mainedot) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning
I-295I-295 CorridorCorridor StudyStudy Scarborough-BrunswickScarborough-Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning May 2010 I-295 Corridor Study Scarborough-Brunswick Prepared by Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT) Bureau of Transportation Systems Planning May 2010 Acknowledgements MaineDOT Edward Hanscom, Study Manager Dennis Emidy, Transportation Engineer PACTS John Duncan, Director Eric Ortman, Transportation Planner Paul Niehoff, Transportation Planner Kevin Hooper, Travel Demand Modeler Other Staff Participants Ernest Martin, MaineDOT Project Development Dan Stewart, MaineDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Sue Moreau, MaineDOT Multimodal Planning & Operations Unit Russ Charette, MaineDOT Mobility Management Division Tracy Perez, formerly MaineDOT Office of Passenger Transportation Gerald Varney, FHWA John Perry, FHWA David Willauer, formerly GPCOG Maddy Adams, GPCOG Corridor Advisory Committee Brunswick: Don Gerrish, Town Manager Theo Holtwijk, Town Planner Cumberland: Bill Shane, Town Manager Carla Nixon, Town Planner Falmouth: George Thebarge, Town Planner Tony Hayes, Public Works Director Freeport: Donna Larson, Town Planner Albert Presgraves, Town Engineer Maine Turnpike Authority: Conrad Welzel, Manager of Government Relations Portland: James Cloutier, City Councilor Larry Mead, Assistant City Manager Mike Bobinsky, Public Works Director State Police I-295 Troop: Lieutenant Ron Harmon Scarborough: Ron Owens, Town Manager Joe Ziepniewski, Town Planner South Portland: Tex Haeuser, Planning Director Steve Johnson, Public Works Director Transit Providers Working Group: Peter Hefler, METRO General Manager Westbrook: Paul Boudreau, Public Works Director Eric Dudley, Chief City Engineer Yarmouth: Nat Tupper, Town Manager Dan Jellis, Town Engineer Cover: I-295 northbound, Exit 3 to Exit 4 (PACTS photo) Table of Contents Executive Summary ES-1 I. Introduction 1-1 A. -
I-95 395 HOT Lane Project Volume 1
K Awadika3 I-95/I-395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Interchange Justification Report Volume 1 January 7, 2009 PRESENTED TO: Virginia Department of Transportation & Federal Highway Administration PREPARED FOR: Fluor Enterprises 4900 Seminary Road Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22331 PREPARED BY: HNTB Corporation 2900 South Quincy Street Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22206 I-95/I-395 HOV/Bus/HOT Lanes Interchange Justification Report January 7, 2009 PRESENTED TO: Virginia Department of Transportation & Federal Highway Administration PREPARED FOR: Fluor Enterprises 4900 Seminary Road Suite 300 Alexandria, VA 22331 PREPARED BY: HNTB Corporation 2900 South Quincy Street Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22206 This document was prepared in a manner consistent with the Federal and State requirements and processes to be utilized in the development of an Interchange Justification Report as documented in the Virginia Department of Transportation Location and Design Division Instructional and Informational Memorandum LD-200.3 Table of Contents ES - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................ES - 1 I. PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 1 A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................... 1 B. COMPREHENSIVE INTERSTATE NETWORK......................................................................................... 5 C. RELATIONSHIP -
Congressional Record—Senate S614
S614 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 5, 2004 says it really could have been more one of our soldiers or an Iraqi citizen. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without dangerous than we even ever thought— Yes, it hurts. objection, it is so ordered. I think we have to assess that in the But do the people of Iraq today have Mr. INHOFE. At this point, I will context of all of the rhetoric we are a better chance to live in freedom and yield to the Senator from Iowa, and hearing about second-guessing a deci- prosperity than they had the entire following his remarks I will seek to be sion that was based on what we had at time they had been ruled by a despot? recognized. the time. Absolutely. Do the people of Afghani- (Mr. ENSIGN assumed the Chair.) Senator FEINSTEIN said we should stan today have the hope for a future Mr. GRASSLEY. Madam President, I relook at our intelligence-gathering or- of freedom more than they had under want to address the consideration that ganization. I do not think anyone the Taliban and the other despots the Senate Finance Committee gave to would disagree with that, including the under whom they have been buried for the portion of the highway bill that de- President of the United States. all these years? Oh, yes. They have a termines the size of the trust fund, In our first effort to address the constitution that is getting ready now source of the trust fund, and our com- issues of the failure that led to 9/11, we to become implemented that actually mittee’s decisionmaking over that.