DOCSLIB.ORG

Jim Davis, Ron Kind, and Adam Smith Leading the House New Democrat Coalition Into the 108Th Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jim Davis, Ron Kind, and Adam Smith Leading the House New Democrat Coalition Into the 108Th Congress l\”l NewDem Jim Davis, Ron Kind, and Adam Smith Leading the House New Democrat Coalition into the 108th Congress. he three co-chairs of the provide resources and incentives for New Democrat Coali- innovation,” said Kind, a member of tion-the largest orga- the House Education and Workforce nized caucus in the U.S. Committee, who was able to play an House of Representa- influential role in shaping the final out- tives-face a tough challenge in the come. 108th Congress, just as they did in the Working with colleagues in the 107th. These two sessions are the first Senate, House NDC members also pro- since the NDC’s formation in 1997 in vided key swing votes to pass the long- which the 70-plus-member group has sought Trade Promotion Authority bill, had to shape the political center without which set an aggressive agenda for the benefit of a Clinton White House opening foreign markets to American ro counter the GOP’s worst impulses. goods and services. NDC members “President Bush has certainly tended helped guide the debate to ensure that IV to push policy debates to the right,” said the bill fundamentally improved assis- REP. JIMDAVIS: Florida, 11th District Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), who took tance for workers displaced by trade over the three-way NDC co-chair- competition. manship in April 2002 with colleagues In the 108th Congress, the three co- Jim Davis (D-Fla.) and Ron Kind (D- chairs will lead their caucus in the Wis.), succeeding the group’s founders, struggle to restore fiscal discipline to the Cal Dooley (D-Calif.),Jim Moran (D- budget process, so the country can both Va.) and Tim Roemer (D-Ind.). fight terrorism and grow the economy. But even with a Republican admin- “We believe everything must be on istration, the NDC continues the table for this discussion,” to hold significant leverage in they wrote in August, a House almost evenly “including provisions of the divided. Its members repre- tax cut passed into law last year sent swing districts around the but not yet enacted, corporate country. As a group, they are tax loopholes that allow busi- the voice of independent-minded nesses to evade taxes by incorporating America. And if Republicans want to overseas, and spending programs.” REP. RON KIND: Wisconsin, Third District get anything done, they have to move Moran has described Davis, Kind, far enough to the center to attract at least and Smith as “three of the best and some NDC votes. brightest members of Congress.” Each In the last Congress, the NDC has the studiousness of a policy wonk achieved policy victories on a number and the skills of a political tactician. of important fronts. Together, they are becoming a cohesive Notably, its members helped design unit, sharing the NDC’s leadership the framework for sweeping education responsibilities. Davis acts as the group’s reform legislation that set high standards liaison to the Democratic Party lead- for student achievement in public ership. Kind handles the relationships schools. The bill also provided more with political fundraising groups like resources for schools to meet those stan- the New Democrat Network and the dards and demanded accountability for Democratic Congressional Campaign results. Committee. And Smith serves as the “Those new reforms will significantly.- group’s liaison to the Democratic Lead- streamline the federal bureaucracy, and ership Council. + REP. ADAM SMITH: Washington, Ninth District LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED Robert Butki n up to the child and his Eric Reeves parents to make the ’ tate-operated college savings choice [that] is best he typical shopping list of a local \ programs-known as 529 for them,” said government may include rock , plans-are an increasingly Butkin. salt for icy roads, chalk for popular way to squirrel away money The plan allows teachers, and paper for office copiers. for tuition. But not all are alike. anyone to chip in, But stocking up on even such simple Their fees, restrictions, and return S 7I not just family. Indi- necessities has traditionally required vary widely from state to state. viduals can automat- an arduous procurement process-with Oklahoma’s plan has been one of the ically deduct as little requests for proposals, bids, and mounds I State Treasurer , highest rated in the country under the lead- Robert Butkin as $15 from their of paper work. ership of State Treasurer Robert Butkin. paychecks or bank 1 Now, thanks to North Carolina State It was one of only nine to earn an ‘R“in -- - -__ accounts to con- I Sen. Eric Reeves, local governments in a USA Today analysis of 43 plans’ overall tribute to a 529 savings plan, and they can his state have a better way. operations and investment performance. claim $2,500 per year in state tax deduc- A new law authored by Reeves allows “We intentionally designed the pro- tions. That incentive helped double the cities, school boards, and other local author- gram to be flexible,” said Butkin. Unlike number of participants in the Oklahoma ities to dramatically increase efficiency some state plans, which require 529 funds plan in eight months. using electronic bidding and procurement. to be used in-state, the Oklahoma Savings An account can be opened with as Under the law, local governments may now Plan gives students more freedom. They little as $25, and there are no contri- hold “reverse auctions” based may use the money in-state or out-of-state, bution limits until the fund has earned on the model pioneered for a private or public university, in a two- $235,000. The point, said Butkin, is “to by Priceline.com, year or four-year college, or for post-sec- make the American Dream come alive which allows buyers ondary vocational instruction. “It is entirely for everyone.” + to name the prices they’d like to pay and lets sellers Daphna Edwards Ziman scramble to offer the best deals they can. / \- hildren’s advocate Daphna Ziman believes the foster care system has its pri- Reeves believes the orities backwards: It rewards itself with more federal and state money as administrative cost sav- I I State Sen. it pushes “problem children” up the institutional ladder from foster fami- ings from this model 1 EricReeves I ! lies to residential treatment centers for “troubled” youth. will be substantial. “If Cn,a[r,tn , She argues the incentives should be reversed: Foster programs should be rewarded utilized fully,” he con- r- ~ I for the progress children make, not their deterioration. tends, “e-procurement “It’s a billion dollar business,” says Ziman, founder and chair of the non-partisan, in [information technology] alone could i, California-based organization Children Uniting Nations. The system’s save the state 40 percent. In tough budget current structure practically encourages underachievement, she times such as these, that money can be ’ says, reinforcing the stigma of the foster child as “incorrigible.” better used to reduce class size in our Ziman, a foster parent herself, is a vocal proponent of men- schools, and to help seniors pay for pre- toring programs that break that dysfunctional cycle by helping scription drugs.” children succeed both academically and socially. The law does not prescribe a one-size- She has championed an innovative model that insists on fits-aU solution. LOCA governments may rigorous training for mentors, providing them the skills to customize electronic bidding systems to develop productive relationships with foster children.The model suit their needs-or use a combination requires mentors to make extended commitments to the chil- of electronic and paper bidding. dren, and it depends heavily on building networks between public I Reeves does not see the new law as an I Daphna Edwards entities and the corporate community to recruit volunteers. end in itself, but rather one step toward Ziman Started in Los kgeles, Ziman hopes to see the approach go fully harnessing the power of new tech- Children 5 Aduocate __..~ national. Legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate by Sen. Mary nologies to make governments more effi- Landrieu (D-La.), with co-sponsors Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and John cient and effective. Kerry (D-Mass.) could help achieve that goal. It would authorize $19 million a year “E-government,’’he says, “has the for public-private partnerships to provide mentoring for foster children. potential to truly reform government to Research shows 45 percent of mentored teens are less likely to use drugs, and make it more nimble so that it can react 49 percent have better academic performance. + to our needs.” + LICENSED TO UNZ.ORG ELECTRONIC REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED of , i Every Friday on NDOL.org :. the- I The Ideas That Conquered the World: Peace, Democracy, and Free Markets in the Twenty-first Pay-for-perfomance in health care a Century 11 by Michael Mandelbaum Public Affairs + 496 pp. + $30.00 One of the surprising pcculiari- Despite war clouds over Iraq, a resur- ties of health care is that doctors gent a1 Qaeda, a nuclear North Korea, arc not paid more for delivering and uncooperative allies, political sci- higher quality care. In fact, doctors entist Michael Mandelbaum still believes who are good at preventing trips to the good news vastly outweighs the bad. the hospital for their parients with Thumbing his nose at conventional chronic conditions like diabetes and wisdom, he argues that Sept. 11 did not asthma may actually lose money shake the Western world’s foundations. because they don’t end LIPbilling for In fact, it strengthened our faith in the as many procedures. pillars of liberal democracy, capitalism, The National Academy of Sci- and peaceful relations among states, ences’ Institute &Medicine (IOM) because militant Islamists and rogue recently released a study proposing regimes do not offer an alternative ide- that the federal government use its enormous purchasing power in health car1 ology with any real drawing power.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ACE Train Has Special Offer Incentives for Cutting S.J. Emissions Proposed
    ACE train has special offer The Record, Published Wednesday, April 23, 2003 Altamont Commuter Express is offering a special deal to commuters who have never tried taking the train to work. Until the end of June, new ACE riders can get a one-week pass for free by calling (800) 411- RAIL. Commuters who call by Thursday each week can get a pass for the next week. After the trial period, those new riders who participated in the "Taste of ACE" event will be able to buy monthly passes for 50 percent off the regular price. For more information on ACE schedules and stations, go to www.acerail.com. Incentives for cutting S.J. emissions proposed By Audrey Cooper, Record Staff Writer Published Thursday, April 24, 2003 FRESNO -- Business and community leaders at a first-ever clean-air summit Wednesday unveiled a proposed plan to cut smog by offering tax incentives and government funds to industries or groups that cut emissions. The Operation Clean Air summit drew more than 400 people from around the San Joaquin Valley, which is by some standards the country's most polluted area. That pollution has been linked to climbing asthma rates, premature deaths and cancer. Operation Clean Air is a public-private organization interested in finding voluntary measures to cut the Valley's pollution. It was the brainchild of Fresno-area politicians and includes representatives of the nine-county Valley air basin. Officials said the proposed plan was only a draft and would go through several changes over the next few months. But the popular centerpiece of the plan is a proposed "Air Quality Improvement Zone," which could work similar to municipal economic-improvement zones that use various financial incentives to encourage urban redevelopment.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Overview
    PRESIDENTIAL OVERVIEW YEAR # VOTES % VOTES # STATES 2000 BUSH 50,455,156 47.9 271 30 GORE 50,992,335 48.4 266 21 NADER 2,882,738 2.7 1 0 OTHER 1,066,398 1.0 0 0 TOTAL 105,396,627 1996 CLINTON 47,402,357 49.2 379 32 DOLE 39,198,755 40.7 159 19 PEROT 8,085,402 8.4 0 0 OTHER 1,591,358 1.7 0 0 TOTAL 96,277,872 1992 CLINTON 44,909,326 43.0% 370 33 BUSH 39,103,882 37.4% 168 18 PEROT 19,741,657 18.9% 0 0 OTHER 670,149 0.7% 0 0 TOTAL 104,425,014 1988 BUSH 48,886,097 53.4% 426 40 DUKAKIS 41,809,074 45.6% 111 11 OTHER 899,638 1.0% 1 0 TOTAL 91,594,809 1984 REAGAN 54,455,075 58.8% 525 49 MONDALE 37,577,185 40.6% 13 2 OTHER 620,582 0% 0 0 TOTAL 92,652,842 1980 REAGAN 43,904,153 50.7% 489 44 CARTER 35,483,883 41.0% 49 7 ANDERSON 5,720,060 6.6% 0 0 TOTAL 86,515,221 1976 FORD 39,147,793 48.0% 240 27 CARTER 40,830,763 50.1% 297 24 OTHER 1,577,333 1.9% 1 0 TOTAL 81,555,889 1972 NIXON 47,169,911 60.7% 520 49 McGOVERN 29,170,383 37.5% 17 2 OTHER 1,378,260 1.7% 1 0 TOTAL 77,718,554 1968 NIXON 31,785,480 43.4% 301 32 HUMPHREY 31,275,166 42.7% 191 14 WALLACE 9,906,473 13.5% 46 5 TOTAL 73,211,875 1964 GOLDWATER 27,178,188 38.5% 52 6 JOHNSON 43,129,566 61.1% 486 45 OTHER 336,838 0.5% 0 0 TOTAL 70,644,592 1960 NIXON 34,108,157 49.5% 219 26 KENNEDY 34,226,731 49.7% 303 22 OTHER 503,331 0.7% 15 2 TOTAL 68,838,219 ELECTORAL COLLEGE TOTAL TO WIN: 270 State Votes Montana 3 Alabama 9 Nebraska 5 Alaska 3 Nevada 5 Arizona 10 New Hampshire 4 Arkansas 6 New Jersey 15 California 55 New Mexico 5 Colorado 9 New York 31 Connecticut 7 North Carolina 15 Delaware 3 North Dakota
    [Show full text]
  • Certificate of the Secretary of State I, BILL JONES, Secretary of State Of
    Certificate of the Secretary of State I, BILL JONES, Secretary of State of the State of California, hereby certify: THAT the following is a full, true, and correct statement of the result of the official canvass of the returns of the November 7, 2000, Presidential General Election. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and affix the Great Seal of California, at Sacramento, this 15th day of December, 2000. BILL JONES Secretary of State xxxi County by County Vote Results for President Al Gore George W. Howard Ralph Harry John Patrick J. Rev. William Bush Phillips Nader Browne Hagelin Buchanan M. Kenyon, Sr. DEM REP AI GRN LIB NL REF IND (W/I) Alameda 342,889 119,279 1,237 27,499 1,910 492 1,026 0 Percent 69.4% 24.2% 0.2% 5.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% Alpine 265 281 1 25 6 0 8 0 Percent 45.3% 48.0% 0.1% 4.3% 1.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% Amador 5,906 8,766 24 584 81 9 94 0 Percent 38.2% 56.7% 0.1% 3.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% Butte 31,338 45,584 125 5,727 381 80 486 0 Percent 37.5% 54.5% 0.1% 6.9% 0.4% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% Calaveras 7,093 10,599 57 863 140 16 108 0 Percent 37.6% 56.2% 0.3% 4.6% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% Colusa 1,745 3,629 12 151 12 3 38 0 Percent 31.3% 65.0% 0.2% 2.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% Contra Costa 224,338 141,373 346 13,067 1,290 286 778 0 Percent 58.9% 37.1% 0.0% 3.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% Del Norte 3,117 4,526 36 485 52 13 65 0 Percent 37.6% 54.6% 0.4% 5.9% 0.6% 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% El Dorado 26,220 42,045 115 3,013 334 72 337 0 Percent 36.4% 58.3% 0.1% 4.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% Fresno 95,059 117,342 207 6,541 440 126 1,120 0 Percent 43.1% 53.2% 0.0%
    [Show full text]
  • Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002
    Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002 Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002 NormanJ. Ornstein American Enterprise Institute Thomas E. Mann Brookings Institution Michael J. Malbin State University of New York at Albany The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002 Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 152.00 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 172.14. To order call toll free 1-800-462.-642.0 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 2.0036 or call 1-800-862.-5801. Available in the United States from the AEI Press, do Publisher Resources Inc., 1224 Heil Quaker Blvd., P O. Box 7001, La Vergne, TN 37086-7001. To order, call toll free: 1-800-937-5557. Distributed outside the United States by arrangement with Eurospan, 3 Henrietta Street, London WC2E 8LU, England. ISBN 0-8447-4167-1 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 0-8447-4168-X (pbk.: alk. paper) 13579108642 © 2002 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States ofAmerica Contents List of Figures and Tables vii Preface ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 107 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 148 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2002 No. 108—Part II House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Wednesday, September 4, 2002, at 2 p.m. Senate THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2002 TRADE ACT OF 2002 MURKOWSKI, and WELLSTONE on bene- Finally, I would say a word of thanks Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. President, before fits for steel retirees. to the many members of the Adminis- we conclude today, I would be remiss if Finally, I, of course want to thank tration who staffed and supported this I did not thank a number of people. my partner on the Finance Committee, legislative effort, including Grant First, in the House, I want to thank Senator CHUCK GRASSLEY for being Aldonas, Faryar Shirzad, Peter David- Chairman BILL THOMAS. He and I dis- helpful throughout this process. son, John Veroneau, Heather Wingate, agree on some things—that’s for sure. Of course, to actually complete work Brenda Becker, Penny Naas, and many But we share a common goal of both on a major bill like this requires the others. expanding trade and helping workers efforts of many others. For more than I—as well as the Senate and the left behind by trade. And we share the 18 months, many staff members have country—owe you all a debt of grati- goal of getting this to the President’s made incalculable efforts to prepare tude.
    [Show full text]
  • California Results from General Election Held on November 2, 2004
    THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR FEDERAL POLICY RESEARCH 419 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 202-546-3700 Fax: 202-546-2390 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.calinst.org SPECIAL REPORT: California Results from General Election held on November 2, 2004 The following table shows final vote totals for California from yesterday's general election for President, U.S. Senate, House of Representatives, and the 16 statewide ballot propositions. Challenger John Kerry outpolled President George Bush by approximately 10 percentage points in California, Senator Barbara Boxer was reelected by approximately a 20-point margin, and all 51 serving Members of Congress that sought reelection won their races. The state's House delegation will continue to include 33 Democrats and 20 Republicans, with party membership unchanged in California's two open House seats -- Dan Lungren won the race to succeed retiring Rep. Doug Ose by a 27-point margin, and Jim Costa won the race to succeed Rep. Cal Dooley by 7.4 percentage points. All results are as of Wednesday morning, November 3, 2004 at 6:41 am PST, and are courtesy of the California Secretary of State's office. To view these data and data from other races -- including 100 state legislative seats -- visit http://vote2004.ss.ca.gov/ . (Data are best viewed in a proportionally spaced font, such as courier.) CANDIDATE PARTY VOTES PERCENT PRESIDENT John F. Kerry Democratic 5,427,133 54.6 * George W. Bush Republican 4,403,475 44.3 Michael Anthony Peroutka American Independent 21,057 0.2 David Cobb Green 31,679 0.3 Michael Badnarik Libertarian 39,797 0.4 Leonard Peltier Peace & Freedom 21,550 0.2 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Omnibus Act of 1988 to the Trade Act of 2002
    AMERICAN TRADE POLITICS: From the Omnibus Act of 1988 To The Trade Act of 2002 Kent Hughes Director, Project on America and the Global Economy Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars A paper prepared for presentation at the Congress Project/Project on America and the Global Economy seminar on “Congress and Trade Policy” at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, November 17, 2003 Kent Hughes, Project on America and the Global Economy 2 Introduction: In 1988, the Congress passed the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 with broad bipartisan support. Unlike most post-World War II trade legislation, the Omnibus Act originated with the Congress rather than with a proposal from the Administration. Despite continuing Administration objections, final passage came in 1988 by wide margins in both the House and the Senate. In addition to a comprehensive competitiveness or productivity growth strategy, the Omnibus Act included negotiating objectives and fast track authority. Under fast track procedures, the Congress agreed to an up or down vote on future trade agreements without the possibility of adding any amendments. Neither the fast track procedures nor the bill’s negotiating objectives were particularly controversial at the time. Fast track authority (for completing negotiations) lapsed on June 1, 1993. President Clinton unsuccessfully sought to renew fast track authority in 1997. He tried again in 1998 only to lose decisively in the House of Representatives. In 2001, a new Administration made securing Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), a new name for fast track, an early Administration priority. Yet despite a newly elected Republican President, George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Info Sought on Power Plant Plan
    Info sought on power plant plan By Tim Moran, staff writer The Modesto Bee, March 3, 2004 The proposed 1,120-megawatt Tesla Power Project near Tracy is not quite ready for prime time, according to a committee of the California Energy Commission. The committee reported late last week that it needs more information on air quality and water elements of the $600 million project. A new hearing has been scheduled for 11 a.m. April 8 at the Tracy Community Center, 300 E. 10th St. The natural gas-fired turbine power plant would be one of the largest in the state, and would be within 10 miles of a 1,100-megawatt plant already licensed by the commission but not yet operating. The Tesla project would be on 60 acres of farmland near Midway Road, southeast of Interstate 580. The site is in eastern Alameda County, near the San Joaquin County border. The plant could be operational by late 2006 if the evidence requests do not cause significant delays. Once a license is approved, the applicant has five years to build. The project is proposed by Midway Power LLC, a subsidiary of Florida Power & Light Group-FPL Energy. The commission's committee wants more testimony on ammonia and particulate air emissions from the project and the water source for cooling the plant. Like Calpine's East Altamont Energy Center, the other large power plant in the area, the Tesla project poses jurisdictional air quality issues. Both power plant sites are in Alameda County, and fall under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama at a Glance
    ALABAMA ALABAMA AT A GLANCE ****************************** PRESIDENTIAL ****************************** Date Primaries: Tuesday, June 1 Polls Open/Close Must be open at least from 10am(ET) to 8pm (ET). Polls may open earlier or close later depending on local jurisdiction. Delegates/Method Republican Democratic 48: 27 at-large; 21 by CD Pledged: 54: 19 at-large; 35 by CD. Unpledged: 8: including 5 DNC members, and 2 members of Congress. Total: 62 Who Can Vote Open. Any voter can participate in either primary. Registered Voters 2,356,423 as of 11/02, no party registration ******************************* PAST RESULTS ****************************** Democratic Primary Gore 214,541 77%, LaRouche 15,465 6% Other 48,521 17% June 6, 2000 Turnout 278,527 Republican Primary Bush 171,077 84%, Keyes 23,394 12% Uncommitted 8,608 4% June 6, 2000 Turnout 203,079 Gen Election 2000 Bush 941,173 57%, Gore 692,611 41% Nader 18,323 1% Other 14,165, Turnout 1,666,272 Republican Primary Dole 160,097 76%, Buchanan 33,409 16%, Keyes 7,354 3%, June 4, 1996 Other 11,073 5%, Turnout 211,933 Gen Election 1996 Dole 769,044 50.1%, Clinton 662,165 43.2%, Perot 92,149 6.0%, Other 10,991, Turnout 1,534,349 1 ALABAMA ********************** CBS NEWS EXIT POLL RESULTS *********************** 6/2/92 Dem Prim Brown Clinton Uncm Total 7% 68 20 Male (49%) 9% 66 21 Female (51%) 6% 70 20 Lib (27%) 9% 76 13 Mod (48%) 7% 70 20 Cons (26%) 4% 56 31 18-29 (13%) 10% 70 16 30-44 (29%) 10% 61 24 45-59 (29%) 6% 69 21 60+ (30%) 4% 74 19 White (76%) 7% 63 24 Black (23%) 5% 86 8 Union (26%)
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may t>e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 University of Oklahoma Graduate College The Tenuous Majority: The Effect of Two-Party Competition on the House of Representatives A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOHN P.
    [Show full text]
  • 6Housecomrosters La
    IMPACT ON HOUSE COMMITTEES House Committee Changes Agriculture Democrats David R. Obey, Wis. Carrie P. Meek, Fla. Republicans John P. Murtha, Pa. David E. Price, N.C. Larry Combest, Texas — chairman Norm Dicks, Wash. Chet Edwards, Texas John A. Boehner, Ohio Bob Riley, Ala. Martin Olav Sabo, Minn. Robert E. “Bud” Cramer, Ala. Robert W. Goodlatte, Va. Mike Simpson, Idaho Steny H. Hoyer, Md. Patrick J. Kennedy, R.I. Richard W. Pombo, Calif. Doug Ose, Calif. Alan B. Mollohan, W.Va. James E. Clyburn, S.C. Nick Smith, Mich. Robin Hayes, N.C. Marcy Kaptur, Ohio Maurice D. Hinchey, N.Y. Terry Everett, Ala. Charles W. “Chip” Pickering Jr., Miss. Nancy Pelosi, Calif. Lucille Roybal-Allard, Calif. Frank D. Lucas, Okla. Timothy V. Johnson, Ill. Peter J. Visclosky, Ind. Sam Farr, Calif. Saxby Chambliss, Ga. Tom Osborne, Neb. Nita M. Lowey, N.Y. Jesse L. Jackson Jr., Ill. Jerry Moran, Kan. Mike Pence, Ind. Jose E. Serrano, N.Y. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, Mich. Bob Schaffer, Colo. Denny Rehberg, Mont. Rosa DeLauro, Conn. Allen Boyd, Fla. John Thune, S.D. Sam Graves, Mo. James P. Moran, Va. Chaka Fattah, Pa. Bill Jenkins, Tenn. Adam H. Putnam, Fla. John W. Olver, Mass. Steven R. Rothman, N.J. John Cooksey, La. Mark Kennedy, Minn. Ed Pastor, Ariz. Gil Gutknecht, Minn. George W. Gekas, Pa. Democrats Armed Services Republicans Charles W. Stenholm, Texas Bob Etheridge, N.C. Bob Stump, Ariz. - chairman Gary A. Condit, Calif. Leonard L. Boswell, Iowa Collin C. Peterson, Minn. David Phelps, Ill. Duncan Hunter, Calif. Jim Ryun, Kan. Cal Dooley, Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports (TTCSP) 6-18-2020 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report" (2020). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 17. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17 2020 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by an information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report Abstract The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations. Over the last 29 years, the TTCSP has developed and led a series of global initiatives that have helped bridge the gap between knowledge and policy in critical policy areas such as international peace and security, globalization and governance, international economics, environmental issues, information and society, poverty alleviation, and healthcare and global health.
    [Show full text]