LYCIA ET PAMPHYLIA Telmessus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

LYCIA ET PAMPHYLIA Telmessus - Xanthus 725. Terracotta relief (H. 0.096, W. 0.12, D. 0.07-0.112), found between Fethiye and Xanthos. Wuppertal-Barmen, Coil. Ernst-Ulrich Walter. Cybele seated on a throne with footstool. She wears a chiton and himation; on either side a sitting lion. She holds in her outstretched right hand a patera; it seems that her other hand is resting on a lion's head. The goddess's head and right shoulder are missing. Cibyra 726. For the coins: CCCA VIII; for the coins of the "Thea Pisidike" on a biga with two lions, see L. and J. Robert, Carie II, 75; 370. Tyriaeum 727. Block with moulding on the left side (H. 0.83, W. 0.61, D. 0.19) at Ilgin. AJA 36, 1932, 456 no 12; MAMA VII, 21 no 108 and Pl. 128. Height of letters: 0.02-0.03. (L)O~ VL O'I:.(J.0\1 XVOU(J.CX\11:-L [xcx]xov cxocxxn CXLVL cx,;~:.(cx)!J.· [ex A1:]1:L 1:-'tL'tl:.'tLX!J.I:.Vo~ I:.L't- 4 [ou]. l. 2: CXLVL SiVe. I. 2-3: cx,;~:.cx!J.cx: "the word is an alternative name for the tomb, or the name of a part of it." MAMA VII, 21 no 6 mentions an inscription for the Meter Andeirene at Agalar. See also nos 286 and 339. 728. Rock-relief (H. 0.435, W. 0.345) situated near a source in the neighbourhood of Tyriaion ( = Teke Kozaga91). Naour, Tyriaion, 82 no 35 and Pl. XVII. In an arched niche with two columns Cybele is seated on a high-backed throne with footstool. She rests both hands on her lap. On either side of the goddess is a seated unidentifiable animal. L YCIA ET P AMPHYLIA 217 F.0 . 1985 ...~ PAMPHYLIA OLBIA_AATTAL~ SlOE L Y C I A POO~ ~L ( PHASELIS• NISA• Adrasan • XANTHUS ~ Fig. 38 Oinoanda 729. Inscription (H. 0.35, W. 0.33) on a rock near Oinoanda. Heberdey-Kalinka, 54f no 79; Hepding in PWRE s.v. Hieroduli, col. 1462; K. Latte, Heiliges Recht, Tiibingen 1920 = Aalen 1964, 104 n. II; Cameron in HThR 32, 1939, 154f no 3; J . and L. Robert in Bull.ep. 1940, no 156. Height of letters: 0.055. KA.otvt~6cx~ 'Ep!J.cx(ou 'Ovo~[<X] pou Mvcxvop<Xcmu~ cbtiA.u- cr&v "tn MY)"tpt 'Opdqt l&pooou A.cx~ 'Axt&pouv xcxt 'Amovt9&tv 5 "tcX~ lcxu"tou 1tCXLOLcrxcx~ tcr"tW 1tcxpt~ ' 07tp<X!J.w~ 'Apdou ~ 9&~ xcxt KA.owt~tpcxto[~), xcxt !lTJ l~icr"tw !J.Y)9&vt &nt1tot-/jcrcxcr9cxt cx1hou 10 xcx9' (sic) ouoivcx "tp61tov, d ot !lTJ &voxo~ tcr"tw "tn MY)"tpt 'Opdqt xcxt 1tpocr· CX1tO"t&L\It"tW LE.pcX~ OpCXX!J.cX~ 1tE.\I"tCX· 15 xocr(cx~. I. 5: 1tcxtOt~ xcxt (Heberdey-Kalinka); 1tcxto(crxcx~ (Cameron). .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Georgy Kantor
Georgy Kantor Lycia et Pamphylia: A Social and Institutional History The project which I am proposing to undertake is a social and institutional history of the Roman province of Lycia and Pamphylia, from the process of establishment of Roman rule in the region in the late Republic and the Julio-Claudian period to the coming of Christianity and the separation of the constituent parts of the province in the early fourth century AD. The project aims at utilising different kinds of evidence – documentary, archaeological, numismatic, literary. Several factors combine to make such a study worthwhile. The isolated nature of the region, separated as it is by mountain ranges from the rest of Anatolia, and the fact that, with a very brief interruption, it has been a single administrative unit for more than two centuries, from the principate of Claudius to at least AD 312, allow us to treat it as a meaningful object of regional history. But below this unity there were striking distinctions between its different parts. In the course of my doctoral work on Roman and local law in the provinces of Asia Minor, I have found preliminary evidence to indicate that the ways in which Pamphylia and Lycia were governed by Rome were different in many crucial aspects. My project will thus provide an opportunity to study two models of Roman rule within one province, and it is at this level that we can best understand how Roman imperial structures worked and contribute to the ongoing discussion (re-opened by recent works of S. Dmitriev and C.
[Show full text]
The Silk Roads Mecca (Haiphong) Hanoi PACIFIC Suakin INDIAN the Silk Roads Are Part of a Vast Region Comprised SUBCONTINENT OCEAN
l a r Prague Krakow Kiev U Seine Volga Paris Rostov On Don EURASIAN STEPPES Karakorum Rhone Elista Lyon Venice Crimea Astrakhan Syr Darya (Iaxartes) MONGOLIAN STEPPES Shanh-du CAUCASUS A RA L Urumqi (Xanadu) Genoa CA S P I A N S E A Danube Turfan BLACK SEA Amu Darya (Oxus) Otrar Porto BALKANS DerbentSEA Khiva Istanbul Tbilisi Kuqa GOBI DESERT Barcelona (Constantinople) (Khwarezm) Beijing Rome Trebizond Kokand Ferghana Dunhuang Bursa Shaki He Huang (Khanbalik) Valencia CENTRAL ASIA Xinjiang Sardis Baku P K JAPAN Lisbon ANATOLIA Erzurum Bukhara E O Aras Samarkand Kashgar N R Ephesus Konya Tabriz Nisa Merv Pyongyang IN E Athens Dara S A Cordoba Granada Gorgan U N Alanya Antioch Nishapur Khotan Penglai Seoul L Nisibis Balkh A Gyengju Aleppo (Bactra) YELLOW Busan Palmyra Rayy Osaka Fez Ecbatana Loyang SEA MEDITERRANEAN SEA Tyre Bagdad IRANIAN Taxila PLATEAU OF TIBET Fukuoka Nara Damascus Ctesiphon PLATEAU Xi'an Yangzhou Tigris Nagasaki Tripoli Jerusalem MESOPOTAMIA (Changan) Alexandria Gaza E Isfahan Nanjing u Harappa Petra p Qalhat Cairo hr ArvandSusa Chengdu Hangzhou ate Chang JiangWuhan s PERSIAN GULF Ningbo Apologos Delhi Qusair Siraf s ( Myos-Hormos) Hormuz u Ganges d n I Foochow Leuce Come Karachi CHINA (Fuzhou) GULF Brahamaputra Medina Zaitun Sohar OF OMAN Canton ARABIAN Barbaricon (Ghuangzhou) (Qhuanzhou) Jeddah Muscat PENINSULA Barygaza Tamralipti Cattigara Nile R E D S E A Qalhat Macau The Silk Roads Mecca (Haiphong) Hanoi PACIFIC Suakin INDIAN The Silk Roads are part of a vast region comprised SUBCONTINENT OCEAN Salalah Pegu M of a network of maritime and land routes. ARABIAN SEA e k o Bolinao n San’a Goa g Hội An They pass through South Asia and Southeast Cana Muza BAY OF BENGAL SOUTH Asia, crossing the Central Asian subcontinent, Aden Madras CHINA the Russian steppes, the Iranian and Anatolian Calicut Pondicherry SEA plateaus, and the Arabian Peninsula.
[Show full text]
2014 Final Program
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF HEAD AND NECK ONCOLOGIC SOCIETIES 5th World Congress of IFHNOS & Annual Meeting of the AHNS AMERICAN HEAD AND NECK SOCIETY Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the Head and Neck Program at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center July 26-30, 2014 Marriott Marquis, New York City, NY The Largest Head and Neck Cancer Congress in History A Century of Progress in Head and Neck Cancer HOSTED BY: ORGANIZED & SPONSORED BY: SUPPORTED BY: FINAL PROGRAM WORLD CONGRESS ON LARYNX CANCER 2015 SAVE THE DATE! To view the provisional program visit www.wclc2015.org KEyNoTE ToPiCS: • Larynx cancer and its place in history • Non-open laryngeal surgery including robots • The patient as a variable in defining outcome • Voice restoration/preservation • Clinical trials and larynx cancer • Reconstruction • Pre-malignant lesions • Radiotherapy-where to for the future • Staging and surgical anatomy • Poor prognostic factors for survival • Voice assessment methods and function • Molecular biology and translational • Chemotherapy-good to use alone? research • Swallowing assessment/ • Public health issues around the rehabilitation world including the status of anti-smoking campaigns in China • Transplant • Patient support structures • Survivorship • Databases • Larynx cancer in the developing world Further information: T: +61 3 9249 1273 E: [email protected] VISIBILITY DONORS Thank you to our 2014 Visibility Donors! The following companies have provided generous support for non-CME meeting activities. DIAMOND DONORS Ethicon US, LLC IBM Watson Medtronic Surgical Technologies PLATINUM DONORS Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals and Onyx Pharmaceuticals IRX Therapeutics, Inc. Merck KGaA GOLD DONORS Bristol-Myers Squibb Exelixis SILVER DONORS Covidien Medrobotics Veracyte BRONZE DONOR Olympus America Inc.
[Show full text]
Phaselis Batı Ve Kuzeybatı Nekropolis'leri the Western And
DOI:10.13114/MJH.2016.298 Geliş Tarihi:04.09.2016 Mediterranean Journal of Humanities Kabul Tarihi:16.11.2016 mjh.akdeniz.edu.tr VI/2 (2016) 279-297 Phaselis Batı ve Kuzeybatı Nekropolis’leri The Western and Northwestern Necropoleis of Phaselis Betül GÜREL Öz: Phaselis, Akdeniz‟de sahip olduğu üç doğal limanıyla önemli bir ticaret noktası olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Kent Lykia ve Pamphylia sınırlarının birleştiği noktada yer almaktadır. Bugüne kadar elde edilen arkeolojik veriler, epigrafik belgeler, nümizmatik bulgular ve antik kaynaklar ışığında kentin Arkaik Dönem‟den Doğu Roma Dönemi‟ne dek iskan gördüğü bilinmektedir. Phaselis‟te 1812 yılında başlayan ve kesintilerle 2000 yılına değin uzanan araştırmalar kent tarihi ve yerleşimi hakkında bazı bilgiler sunmasına karşın Phaselis nekropolis‟lerine dair detaylı bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu durum Phaselis‟in bölge sınırları içerisinde yer alan diğer antik kentlerle mezar mimarisini ve ölü gömme geleneklerini benzerlik ve farklılıklar açısından incelemeyi gerekli kılmaktadır. Kentte çeşitli unsurlarla birbirinden ayrılan üç nekropolis alanı bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, nekropolis araştırmalarının başlangıcı için belirlenen “Batı ve Kuzeybatı Nekropolis” mercek altına alınmaktadır. Bu bağlamda şimdiye değin elde edilen veriler ışığında, nekropolis‟lerin kent içindeki konumu, sınırları, mezar türlerinin tespiti ve dağılımı ekseninde kentin gömü geleneğinin mezar mimarisine yansımalarına dair bilinenler ve yorumlar paylaşılmaktadır. Ayrıca kuzeybatı nekropolis‟te yer alan mezarların topografya üzerindeki dağılımını gösteren harita da çalışma içerisinde yer almaktadır. Anahtar sözcükler: Phaselis, Nekropolis, Mezar, Lahit, Khamasorion, Ostothek, İnhumasyon, Kremasyon Abstract: The ancient Mediterranean port-city of Phaselis attracts attention as an significant commercial hub with its three natural harbours. The city is located on the border between Lycia and Pamphylia.
[Show full text]
THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1
CHAPTER 38 THE GEOGRAPHY OF GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 Mark Wilson KEY POINTS • Galatia is both a region and a province in central Asia Minor. • The main cities of north Galatia were settled by the Gauls in the third cen- tury bc. • The main cities of south Galatia were founded by the Greeks starting in the third century bc. • Galatia became a Roman province in 25 bc, and the Romans established colonies in many of its cities. • Pamphylia was part of Galatia in Paul’s day, so Perga and Attalia were cities in south Galatia. GALATIA AS A REGION and their families who migrated from Galatia is located in a basin in north-cen- Thrace in 278 bc. They had been invited tral Asia Minor that is largely flat and by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to serve as treeless. Within it are the headwaters of mercenaries in his army. The Galatians the Sangarius River (mode rn Sakarya) were notorious for their destructive and the middle course of the Halys River forays, and in 241 bc the Pergamenes led (modern Kızılırmak). The capital of the by Attalus I defeated them at the battle Hittite Empire—Hattusha (modern of the Caicus. The statue of the dying Boğazköy)—was in eastern Galatia near Gaul, one of antiquity’s most noted the later site of Tavium. The name Galatia works of art, commemorates that victo- derives from the twenty thousand Gauls ry. 1 The three Galatian tribes settled in 1 . For the motif of dying Gauls, see Brigitte Kahl, Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 77–127.
[Show full text]
3Rd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on ECONOMIC RESEARCH 24-25Th October 2019, Alanya, Turkey
3rd INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC RESEARCH 24-25th October 2019, Alanya, Turkey CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Thursday, 24 October 2019 08:00 - 09:30 Registration 09:30-10:00 Opening Ceremony + Welcoming Speeches 10:00-12:00 Keynote Speeches Prof. Dr. Richard A. Werner, Oxford University, United Kingdom The Collapse of Conventional Economics and Ascent of the New Paradigm in Macroeconomics Dr. Marc Bacchetta, World Trade Organization (WTO) Making Trade More Inclusive: The Role of Domestic Policies and International Cooperation Prof. Dr. Peter Neary, Oxford University, United Kingdom Gravity without Apologies: The Science of Elasticities, Distance, and Trade (with Céline Carrere and Monika Mrázová) 12:00 – 13:30 Lunch Thursday 24 October 2019 13:00– 14:15 Session 1-A, Conference Room A Chairperson: Prof. Dr. İsmail Genç, American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Central Bank Seigniorage and Profits during the Crises of 2007-2018 Zbigniew Polański and and Mikołaj Szadkowski How the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank Challenges the World Bank: A Comparative Analysis of Projects by the AIIB and the World Bank in Gujarat, India Junhao Xu Effect of Financial Inclusion on Equality, Poverty and Human Development in the Context of South Asia Souvik Banerjee The Effect of Domestic Risks on Economic Risk in Northern African Countries: Findings from First and Second Generation Panel Approaches Melike Torun and Dervis Kirikkaleli Coffee Break: 14:15-14:30 Thursday 24 October 2019 13:00– 14:15 Session 1-B, Conference Room B Chairperson:
[Show full text]
Health and Wealth in the Roman Empire
G Model EHB 762 No. of Pages 13 Economics and Human Biology xxx (2018) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Economics and Human Biology journa l homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ehb Health and wealth in the Roman Empire Willem M. Jongman*, Jan P.A.M. Jacobs, Geertje M. Klein Goldewijk University of Groningen, the Netherlands A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Ancient Rome was the largest and most populous empire of its time, and the largest pre-industrial state in Received 30 August 2018 European history. Recent though not universally accepted research suggests that at least for the most Received in revised form 14 January 2019 populous central periods of its history standard of living was also rather higher than before or after. To Accepted 15 January 2019 trace whether this is also reflected in Roman biological standard of living, we present the first large and Available online xxx more or less comprehensive dataset, based on skeletal data for some 10,000 individuals, covering all periods of Roman history, and all regions (even if inevitably unequally). We discuss both the JEL classification: methodologies that we developed and the historical results. Instead of reconstructing heights from the C55 fi C82 long bones assuming xed body proportions or from one individual long bone, we apply exploratory N01 factor analysis and calculate factor scores for 50-year periods. Our measure of the biological standard of N33 living declined during the last two centuries B.C. and started to improve again, slowly at first, from the O01 second century A.D.
[Show full text]
Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 133 (2000) 221–235
JAKOB MUNK HØJTE IMPERIAL VISITS AS OCCASION FOR THE ERECTION OF PORTRAIT STATUES? aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 133 (2000) 221–235 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 221 IMPERIAL VISITS AS OCCASION FOR THE ERECTION OF PORTRAIT STATUES? In studies of portraits of Roman emperors, little attention is generally paid to the question of when and why portrait statues were erected. Rather, the main objective is to determine the date of the original or “Urbild” for each portrait type from which subsequent images were reproduced and distributed through- out the empire. Whenever the practical aspects concerning the erection of imperial statues are discussed occasions directly related to the emperor, accession to the throne, military victories, jubilees, the holding of magistracies, marriage and important events in the life of a designated heir, figure among the most frequently cited.1 In addition, imperial visits in cities around the empire have been seen as the most obvious moment for a city to show its loyalty towards the emperor by setting up his image. Imperial statues were sometimes erected when emperors visited a city, but the extent to which this practice was followed has never been fully investigated. Nevertheless the assumption has influenced the interpreta- tion of imperial portraits, most notably those of Hadrian, who shared his time almost equally between Rome and the provinces. Hadrian’s travelling activities have been thought to have had an effect on the general output of portrait statues as stated in a recent handbook on Roman sculpture: “There are more surviving portraits of Hadrian than of any other emperor besides Augustus.
[Show full text]
Epigraphic Evidence for Boundary Disputes in the Roman Empire
EPIGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FOR BOUNDARY DISPUTES IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE by Thomas Elliott A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2004 Approved by _____________________________________ Advisor: Professor Richard Talbert _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Jerzy Linderski _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Mary Boatwright _____________________________________ Reader: Professor George Houston _____________________________________ Reader: Professor Melissa Bullard ii This page intentionally left blank. iii © 2004 Thomas Elliott ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iv This page intentionally left blank. v ABSTRACT THOMAS ELLIOTT: Epigraphic Evidence for Boundary Disputes in the Roman Empire (Under the direction of Richard Talbert) This dissertation presents all published Greek and Latin epigraphic documents relating to internal boundary disputes of the Roman empire. In date, it spans the period from 2 BC to the third century AD. Spatially, the documents derive from 12 provinces ( Achaia, Africa, Asia, Baetica, Cilicia, Creta et Cyrene, Dalmatia, Iudaea, Lusitania, Macedonia, Moesia and Syria ), plus Italy. The presentation of each includes a text, English translation, bibliography and commentary. Analytical chapters expand upon recent published work by G. Burton and B. Campbell. Terminological analysis permits classification of epigraphic and literary evidence into five categories: boundary disputes, restoration of public and sacred lands, other land disputes, the assignment of boundaries and other authoritative demarcations involving Roman officials. The analysis also provides a more focused definition of several Latin and Greek words that indicate the delivery of a verdict by a Roman official ( decretum, sententia, iudicium, ἀποφάσις, κρίσις, ἐπικρίμα ).
[Show full text]
Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion
Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 8 | 1995 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.605 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1995 Number of pages: 205-266 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion », Kernos [Online], 8 | 1995, Online since 11 April 2011, connection on 16 September 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/kernos/605 Kernos Kernos, 8 (1995), p, 205-266. EpigrapWc Bulletin for Greek Religion 1991 (EBGR) This fifth issue of BEGR presents the publications of 1991 along with several addenda to BEGR 1987-1990. The division of the work between New York and Heidelberg, for the first time this year, caused certain logistical prablems, which can be seen in several gaps; some publications of 1991 could not be considered for this issue and will be included in the next BEGR, together with the publications of 1992. We are optimistic that in the future we will be able to accelerate the presentation of epigraphic publications. The principles explained in Kernos, 4 (991), p. 287-288 and Kernos, 7 (994), p. 287 apply also to this issue, The abbreviations used are those of L'Année Philologique and the Supplementum Bpigraphicum Graecum. We remind our readers that the bulletin is not a general bibliography on Greek religion; works devoted exclusively to religious matters (marked here with an asterisk) are presented very briefly, even if they make extensive use of inscriptions, In exceptional cases (see n° 87) we include in our bulletin studies on the Linear B tablets.
[Show full text]
Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 116 (1997) 273–283 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
ROBERT L. DISE, JR. TRAJAN, THE ANTONINES, AND THE GOVERNOR’S STAFF aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 116 (1997) 273–283 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 273 TRAJAN, THE ANTONINES, AND THE GOVERNOR’S STAFF1 Since the late nineteenth century, scholars have succeeded in mapping the general outlines of the elabo- rately structured third-century Roman governor’s staff, the officium consularis. Recent work has even begun to clarify its complex workings.2 But the third-century officium did not appear ex nihilo. It re- sulted from a long evolutionary process, the beginnings of which lie far back in the early decades of the Principate. While a great deal is known about the mature officium, very little is known about its evolu- tion, for although hundreds of inscriptions document the inner workings of the officium in the third century as well as the personnel assigned to it, very little information survives illuminating the earlier stages of its development. A possible reference in Tacitus’ Histories (Hist. iv.48) a handful of passages 1 In this article the following abbreviations will be used: Alföldy, Noricum G. Alföldy, Noricum (London 1974). CBFIR E. Schallmayer, et al., Der römische Weihebezirk von Osterburken I, Corpus der griechischen und lateinischen Beneficiarier-Inschriften des Römischen Reiches (Stuttgart 1990). Mirkoviç M. Mirkoviç, "Beneficiarii Consularis and the New Outpost in Sirmium", Roman Frontier Studies 1989 (Exeter 1991) 252-256. Ott J. Ott, Der Beneficiarier (Stuttgart 1995). RO2 A. von Domaszewski and D.J. Breeze, Die Rangordnung des römischen Heeres (Köln2 1967). Schallmayer, RFS 1989 E. Schallmayer, "Zur Herkunft und Funktion der Beneficiarier", Roman Frontier Studies 1989 (Exeter 1991), 400-406.
[Show full text]
Provincia: Befehlsbereich Und Provinzgebiet 5 Die Benennungen
VORWORT TEIL I: DIE LEITLINIEN DER ORDNUNG RÖMISCHER PROVINZEN: PRAGMATIK, EMPIRIE UND FLEXIBILITÄT PROVINCIA 5 Provincia: Befehlsbereich und Provinzgebiet 5 Die Benennungen von Provinzen 7 Provinzen mit Doppelnamen 8 - Erklärende Beinamen: superior, inferior, ulterior, Cisalpina, Transalpina, nova, salutaris 8 Publicae provinciae und kaiserliche Provinzen 10 KONSTITUIERUNG UND LEITUNG EINER PROVINZ 14 Einführung: Die Prinzipien der römischen Herrschaftsausübung 14 Die Provinzgründer 21 Einzelne Provinzgründer 21 - Grundsätzliche Aufgaben der Provinzgründer 41 Provinzstatut 44 DIE ADMINISTRATION EINER PROVINZ 48 Magistrate und Promagistrate als Statthalter 48 Die Statthalter der publicae provinciae (proconsules) 55 - Die Statthalter der kaiserlichen Provinzen (legati Augusti pro praetore) 59 - Das Kommando der kaiserlichen Statthalter über Legionen 64 - Die Dauer der Statthalterschaften in der Kaiserzeit 65 - Mit proprätorischer Amtsgewalt bestallte Legionslegaten 67 - Präsidialprokuratoren 68 - Praefectus provinciae und sonstige Präfekten (Subgou- verneure, praefectus civitatis, gentis, orae maritimae) 70 - Exkurs: procurator pro legato 75 - Praeses provinciae 77 - Der Verzicht auf eine Statthalterschaft 78 - Die Vertretung einer Statthalterschaft 81 - Von der personalen zur institutionalisierten Vertretung: Ritter als Verweser senatorischer Statthalterschaften 85 Besondere Imperien 87 Weitreichende Imperien zur Zeit der späten Republik 88 - Übergeordnete Imperien in der Kaiserzeit 93 Besondere Befugnisse von legati Augusti pro praetore
[Show full text]