Resource Partitioning Among Sympatric Carnivore Species Inhabiting Pir Lasura National Park (PLNP), AJ&K During 2014-2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resource Partitioning Among Sympatric Carnivore Species Inhabiting Pir Lasura National Park (PLNP), AJ&K During 2014-2017 RESOURCE PARTITIONING AMONG SYMPATRIC CARNIVORE SPECIES AT PIR LASURA NATIONAL PARK, AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR, PAKISTAN FARAZ AKRIM 11-arid-3899 Department of Wildlife Management Faculty of Forestry, Range Management and Wildlife Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan 2018 RESOURCE PARTITIONING AMONG SYMPATRIC CARNIVORE SPECIES AT PIR LASURA NATIONAL PARK, AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR, PAKISTAN by FARAZ AKRIM (11-arid-3899) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Wildlife Management Department of Wildlife Management Faculty of Forestry, Range Management and Wildlife Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi Pakistan 2018 IN THE NAME OF ALLAH The Most Merciful The Most Beneficent The Most Knowing “It is ALLAH who has made for you the earth as a resting place and the sky as a canopy and has given you shape and made your shapes beautiful and has provided for you sustenance of things pure and good. Such is ALLAH your Lord. So glory to ALLAH. The Lord of the world” GOLDEN SAYINGS OF THE HOLY PROPHET HAZRAT MUHAMMAD (Peace be upon him) “Keep your thought well composed, and search the fact of wisdom for it, otherwise mind gets weary and the people get weary, so ponder into the knowledge and science thought fully and search for new facts and ideas” I DEDICATE THIS EFFORT TO OUR BELOVED HOLY PROPHET HAZARAT MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM) CONTENTS Page List of Tables xii List of Figures xv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xxi ABSTRACT xxiv 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1.1 Common Leopard 4 1.1.2 Asiatic/ Golden Jackal 5 1.1.3 Red Fox 7 1.1.4 Common/Asian Palm Civet 9 1.1.5 Small Indian Civet 10 1.1.6 Indian Grey Mongoose 12 1.1.7 Small Indian Mongoose 13 1.2 STUDY AREA 16 1.2.1 Study Objectives 17 1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY 18 1.4 ORGANIZATION OF THE THESIS 18 2 DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF CARNIVORES AT PIR 20 LASURA NATIONAL PARK, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, PAKISTAN 2.1 INTRODUCTION 20 2.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 21 2.3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 24 2.3.1 Diversity of Carnivores 24 2.3.2 Distribution of Carnivore Species 25 2.3.3 Statistical Analysis 26 2.4 RESULTS 26 2.4.1 Diversity of Carnivore Species 26 2.4.2 Distribution of Carnivore Species 27 2.4.2.1 Distribution of common leopard 27 2.4.2.2 Distribution of Asiatic jackal 27 2.4.2.3 Distribution of Kashmir hill fox 31 2.4.2.4 Distribution of Asian palm civet 31 2.4.2.5 Distribution of small Indian civet 39 2.4.2.6 Distribution of Indian grey mongoose 39 2.4.2.7 Distribution of small Indian mongoose 44 2.5 DISCUSSION 44 2.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 55 3 DIET COMPOSITION OF SYMPATRIC CARNIVORE SPECIES 56 AT PIR LASURA NATIONAL PARK 3.1 INTRODUCTION 56 3.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 57 3.3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 59 3.3.1 Molecular Identification of Carnivore Scats 59 3.3.2 Scat Analysis 63 3.3.2.1 Whole mount preparation 63 3.3.2.2 Scale replication 65 3.3.2.3 Identification of plant matter recovered 65 3.3.3 Statistical Analysis 65 3.4 RESULTS 67 3.4.1 Molecular Identification of Carnivore Scats 67 3.4.1.1 Accuracy and precision for molecular identification of 68 carnivore scats 3.4.2 Morphological Characteristics of Carnivore Scats 70 3.4.3 Diet Composition of Carnivore Species 70 3.4.3.1 Diet composition of common leopard 70 3.4.3.2 Diet of Asiatic jackal 79 3.4.3.3 Diet composition of Kashmir hill fox 84 3.4.3.4 Diet composition of Asian palm civet 88 3.4.3.5 Diet composition of small Indian civet 93 3.4.3.6 Diet composition of Indian grey mongoose 101 3.4.3.7 Diet composition of small mongoose 102 3.4.4 Diversity Index, Richness and Evenness of Prey 110 3.5 DISCUSSION 111 3.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 127 4 ASSESMENT OF CARNIVORE PREY SPECIES ABUNDANCE 129 AT PIR LASURA NATIONAL PARK 4.1 INTRODUCTION 129 4.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 130 4.3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 131 4.4 RESULTS 132 4.5 DISCUSSION 135 4.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 138 5 NICHE BREADTH AND NICHE OVERLAP AMONG SYMPATRIC 140 CARNIVORE SPECIES AT PIR LASURA NATIONAL PARK 5.1 INTRODUCTION 140 5.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 142 5.3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 143 5.3.1 Niche Breadth 143 5.3.2 Niche Overlap 144 5.4 RESULTS 145 5.4.1 Dietary Niche Breadth 145 5.4.2 Niche Overlap 148 5.5 DISCUSSION 148 5.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 155 6 ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN-CARNIVORE CONFLICT AT PIR 157 LASUARA NATIONAL PARK 6.1 INTRODUCTION 157 6.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 159 6.3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 160 6.3.1 Methods 160 6.3.1.1 Questionnaire survey 162 6.3.1.2 Statistical analysis 165 6.4 RESULTS 167 6.4.1 Major Predator 167 6.4.2 Daily Attack Pattern 170 6.4.3 Monthly Attack Frequency 170 6.4.4 Seasonal and Annual Variation 170 6.4.5 Guarding, Herd Size and Penning 173 6.4.6 Local Perception About Conservation Status 173 6.4.7 Retaliatory Killing 174 6.4.8 Financial Losses 174 6.5 DISCUSSION 174 6.6 CHAPTER SUMMARY 179 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION 181 7.1 RECOMMENDATIONS 209 7.2 FUTURE PROSPECTIVE 210 SUMMARY 211 LITERATURE CITED 214 APPENDICES 246 List of Tables Table No. Page 2.1 Direct and indirect signs of carnivores in and around Pir Lasura 32 National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan 2. 2 Distribution of carnivore species in and around Pir Lasura National 33 Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan, as shown by the occurrence of any of the direct and indirect signs of the species. The + signs shows presence while – signs shows absence of the species at particular site 3.1 Confusion matrix of scats of carnivore species identification using 71 morphological and molecular identification techniques 3.2 Error rates in species identification in the field corrected with 72 molecular identification of carnivore scats 3.3 Measurements of morphological characteristics of sympatric 73 carnivore scats (Mean ± SEM) sampled from in and around Pir Lasura National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan 3.4 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of common 77 leopard 3.5 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in the scats of 77 common leopard (Panthera pardus) collected from the PLNP, AJ&K 3.6 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of Asiatic 85 jackal 3.7 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in diet of Asiatic 85 jackal 3.8 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of Kashmir 89 hill fox 3.9 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in diet of Kashmir 89 hill fox 3.10 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of Asian 94 Palm civet 3.11 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in diet of Asian palm 94 civet 3.12 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of small 98 Indian civet 3.13 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in diet of small 98 Indian civet 3.14 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of Indian 103 grey mongoose 3.15 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in diet of Indian grey 103 mongoose 3.16 Percent volume of prey items recovered from the scats of small 107 Indian mongoose 3.17 Percent frequency of occurrence of prey items in diet of small 107 Indian mongoose 3.18 Prey species diversity index, prey species richness and evenness in 113 diet of sympatric carnivore species in and around Pir Lasura National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan 4.1 Abundance estimation of rodent prey species in the PLNP, AJ&K 133 4.2 Abundance estimation mammalian species in the PLNP, AJ&K 133 4.3 Abundance estimation of bird species in and around PLNP (20 133 transects, Transect 200m wide 500m long) 4.4 Abundance of amphibians and reptiles in the PLNP, AJ&K 136 4.5 Abundance estimation of invertebrates in the PLNP, AJ&K 136 4.6 Abundance of domestic prey species in district Kotli Azad 136 Kashmir. (Data source report DCR 2017.18-5-2017 data collected from 52 units. Department of Livestock and dairy development Kotli AJ&K. District area (1862 km sq.) 5.1 Niche breadth of sympatric carnivores occurring in and around Pir 146 Lasura National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan L= Niche breadth; Lst= standardized niche breadth (Value 0-1) 5.2 Niche overlap between sympatric carnivore species occurring in 149 and around Pir Lasura National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan 6.1 Livestock, dog, pet and poultry killed by various carnivore species 169 in and around Pir Lasura National Park (PLNP), Azad Jammu and Kashmir during 2008-2015 6.2 Monthly variation in attacks of common leopard (Panthera pardus) 172 during 2008-2015 in and around Pir Lasura National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan List of Figures Fig. No. Page 1.1 Global distribution of common leopard. Distribution data retrieved 8 from IUCN database and map generated using Arc GIS software version 10.1. 1.2 Global distribution of Asiatic jackal. Distribution data retrieved 8 from IUCN database and map generated using Arc GIS software version 10.1 1.3 Global distribution of the red fox.
Recommended publications
  • Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Kit Fox (Vulpes Macrotis)
    Author's Personal Copy J. Comp. Path. 2019, Vol. 167, 60e72 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/jcpa DISEASE IN WILDLIFE OR EXOTIC SPECIES Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis) N. Yanagisawa*, R. E. Wilson*, P. H. Kass† and F. J. M. Verstraete* *Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences and † Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA Summary Skull specimens from 836 kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) were examined macroscopically according to predefined criteria; 559 specimens were included in this study. The study group consisted of 248 (44.4%) females, 267 (47.8%) males and 44 (7.9%) specimens of unknown sex; 128 (22.9%) skulls were from young adults and 431 (77.1%) were from adults. Of the 23,478 possible teeth, 21,883 teeth (93.2%) were present for examina- tion, 45 (1.9%) were absent congenitally, 405 (1.7%) were acquired losses and 1,145 (4.9%) were missing ar- tefactually. No persistent deciduous teeth were observed. Eight (0.04%) supernumerary teeth were found in seven (1.3%) specimens and 13 (0.06%) teeth from 12 (2.1%) specimens were malformed. Root number vari- ation was present in 20.3% (403/1,984) of the present maxillary and mandibular first premolar teeth. Eleven (2.0%) foxes had lesions consistent with enamel hypoplasia and 77 (13.8%) had fenestrations in the maxillary alveolar bone. Periodontitis and attrition/abrasion affected the majority of foxes (71.6% and 90.5%, respec- tively).
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Common Leopard Panthera Pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Kunjo VDC of Mustang District, Nepal
    Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. Status of Common Leopard Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Kunjo VDC of Mustang District, Nepal Submitted by Yadav Ghimirey M.Sc thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Environmental Management Evaluation Committee: Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah Advisor (Member) ………………………… Co-ordinator/AP (Member) ………………………… (Member) Yadav Ghimirey Previous Degree: Bachelor of Science Sikkim Government College Gangtok, Sikkim India School of Environmental Management and Sustainable Development Shantinagar, Kathmandu Nepal October 2006 1 Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software http://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ………………………………………………...................i List of Tables .................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii List of Plates ……............................................................................................................. iv Abstract ..............................................................................................................................v Acknowledgements........................................................................................................... vi 1. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….....1
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroducing San Joaquin Kit Fox to Vacant Or Restored Lands: Identifying Optimal Source Populations and Candidate Foxes
    REINTRODUCING SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX TO VACANT OR RESTORED LANDS: IDENTIFYING OPTIMAL SOURCE POPULATIONS AND CANDIDATE FOXES PREPARED FOR THE U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT CONSERVATION PROGRAM 2800 COTTAGE WAY, SACRAMENTO, CA 95825 Prepared by: Samantha Bremner-Harrison1 & Brian L. Cypher California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program P.O. Box 9622 Bakersfield, CA 93389 1Current address: School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences Nottingham Trent University, Brackenhurst Campus Southwell NG25 0QF 2011 Kit fox relocation report_ESRP.doc REINTRODUCING SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX TO VACANT OR RESTORED LANDS: IDENTIFYING OPTIMAL SOURCE POPULATIONS AND CANDIDATE FOXES TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... i Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 6 Behavioral variation and suitability ........................................................................................................... 6 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 9 Study sites .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Wildlife Fund Swift Fox Report
    SWIFT FOX CONSERVATION TEAM Swift Fox in Valley County, Montana. Photo courtesy of Ryan Rauscher REPORT FOR 2009-2010 SWIFT FOX CONSERVATION TEAM: REPORT FOR 2009-2010 COMPILED AND EDITED BY: Kristy Bly World Wildlife Fund May 2011 Preferred Citation: Bly, K., editor. 2011. Swift Fox Conservation Team: Report for 2009-2010. World Wildlife Fund, Bozeman, Montana and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Swift Fox Conservation Team Members ............................................................................................. 6 Swift Fox Conservation Team Participating Cooperators .................................................................... 7 Swift Fox Conservation Team Interested Parties ................................................................................. 8 STATE AGENCIES Colorado Status of Swift Fox Activities in Colorado, 2009-2010 Jerry Apker ............................................................................................................................. 10 Kansas Swift Fox Investigations in Kansas, 2009-2010 Matt Peek ................................................................................................................................ 11 Montana Montana 2009 and 2010 Swift Fox Report Brian Giddings ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Panthera Pardus) Range Countries
    Profiles for Leopard (Panthera pardus) Range Countries Supplemental Document 1 to Jacobson et al. 2016 Profiles for Leopard Range Countries TABLE OF CONTENTS African Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus)...................................................... 4 North Africa .................................................................................................. 5 West Africa ................................................................................................... 6 Central Africa ............................................................................................. 15 East Africa .................................................................................................. 20 Southern Africa ........................................................................................... 26 Arabian Leopard (P. p. nimr) ......................................................................... 36 Persian Leopard (P. p. saxicolor) ................................................................... 42 Indian Leopard (P. p. fusca) ........................................................................... 53 Sri Lankan Leopard (P. p. kotiya) ................................................................... 58 Indochinese Leopard (P. p. delacouri) .......................................................... 60 North Chinese Leopard (P. p. japonensis) ..................................................... 65 Amur Leopard (P. p. orientalis) ..................................................................... 67 Javan Leopard
    [Show full text]
  • Leopard (Panthera Pardus) Status, Distribution, and the Research Efforts Across Its Range
    Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range Andrew P. Jacobson1,2,3, Peter Gerngross4, Joseph R. Lemeris Jr.3, Rebecca F. Schoonover3, Corey Anco5, Christine Breitenmoser- Wu¨rsten6, Sarah M. Durant1,7, Mohammad S. Farhadinia8,9, Philipp Henschel10, Jan F. Kamler10, Alice Laguardia11, Susana Rostro-Garcı´a9, Andrew B. Stein6,12 and Luke Dollar3,13,14 1 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom 2 Department of Geography, University College London, London, United Kingdom 3 Big Cats Initiative, National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C., United States 4 BIOGEOMAPS, Vienna, Austria 5 Department of Biological Sciences, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, United States 6 IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, c/o KORA, Bern, Switzerland 7 Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx Zoo, Bronx, NY, United States 8 Iranian Cheetah Society (ICS), Tehran, Iran 9 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Tubney, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom 10 Panthera, New York, NY, United States 11 The Wildlife Institute, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China 12 Landmark College, Putney, VT, United States 13 Department of Biology, Pfeiffer University, Misenheimer, NC, United States 14 Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States ABSTRACT The leopard’s (Panthera pardus) broad geographic range, remarkable adaptability, and secretive nature have contributed to a misconception that this species might not be severely threatened across its range. We find that not only are several subspecies and regional populations critically endangered but also the overall range loss is greater than the average for terrestrial large carnivores. 31 December 2015 Submitted To assess the leopard’s status, we compile 6,000 records at 2,500 locations Accepted 5 April 2016 Published 4May2016 from over 1,300 sources on its historic (post 1750) and current distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Poisoning of Endangered Ara- Bian Leopard in Saudi Arabia and Its
    short communication M. ZAFAR-UL ISLAM1*, AHMED BOUG1, ABDULLAH AS-SHEHRI1 & MUKHLID AL JAID1 depleted key prey populations like the Nubian ibex Capra nubiana, Hyrax Procavia capensis, Poisoning of endangered Ara- and Cape hare Lepus capensis (Al Johany 2007). As a consequence, the leopard has be- bian leopard in Saudi Arabia come increasingly dependent upon domestic stock for its subsistence, in turn leading to and its conservation efforts retaliation by those herders losing animals. Carcasses are poisoned and traps set to kill Many killings of leopards can be attributed to livestock protection. When catching the predator whenever it is encountered (Ju- goats, sheep, young camels or other domestic animals, leopards interfere with hu- das et al. 2006). Although legally protected, man activities and are seen as straight competitors. With the decrease of natural the current law enforcement is ineffective (Al prey species, they have to more and more shift their diet to livestock, which increas- Johany 2007, Judas et al. 2006). Finally, there es their unpopularity. In most cases, they are also considered as a threat for human. are reports of the sale of furs and rarely live As a result, leopard is hunted across its range, with different methods (trapping, poi- animals sold in the market. For example one soning, shooting). Poisoning using anticoagulant rat killer was common in the eight- cat was sold for $4,800 in the Al Khawbah ies, which was stopped in 1985 unlike trapping. A total of only five known incidences market in 1997 (Judas et al. 2006). Leopard of poisoning of Arabian leopards Panthera pardus nimr have been recorded in Saudi fat is valued by some locals for its perceived Arabia between 1965 and 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • KIT FOX Vulpes Macrotis
    A-28 KIT FOX Vulpes macrotis Description The small-bodied kit fox closely resembles the swift fox (Vulpes velox) but has larger ears and a more angular appearance. The skull is long and delicate, and The kit fox is the broader at the eyes and more slender at the nose than other North American daintiest of three Vulpes. The ears are set close to the midline of the skull (McGrew 1979, species of Vulpes in Sheldon 1992). The kit fox measures 730 to 840 mm in total length; including a North America 260 to 323 mm tail, 78 to 94 mm ears, and 113 to 137 mm hindfeet. Adult (Fitzgerald et al. weight ranges from 1.5 to 2.5 kg. Females are 15 percent lighter on average 1994). than males (Fitzgerald et al. 1994), but there is no other obvious sexual dimorphism. Tail length averages about 40 percent of total body length—a distinguishing trait, along with the large ears, from swift foxes (Sheldon 1992). The kit fox has a light-colored pelage, variable between grizzled-gray, yellow- gray and buff-gray. The shoulders, flanks and chest range from buff to orange. Guard hairs are tipped black or banded. The underfur is lighter buff or white, and relatively heavy and coarse. The legs are slender and thickly furred. The sides of the muzzle are blackish or brownish, and the tip of the tail is black. The soles of the feet are protected by stiff tufts of hair. Because of its relative coarseness, a kit fox pelt has little market value (O'Farrell 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility and Strategies for Translocating San Joaquin Kit Foxes to Vacant Or Restored Habitats
    FEASIBILITY AND STRATEGIES FOR TRANSLOCATING SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES TO VACANT OR RESTORED HABITATS PREPARED FOR THE CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT CONSERVATION PROGRAM U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SACRAMENTO, CA 95825 Prepared by: Samantha Bremner-Harrison and Brian L. Cypher California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program 1900 N. Gateway #101 Fresno, CA 93727 November 2007 FEASIBILITY AND STRATEGIES FOR REINTRODUCING SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOXES TO VACANT OR RESTORED HABITATS Samantha Bremner-Harrison and Brian L. Cypher California State University, Stanislaus Endangered Species Recovery Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................i 1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 1 2. Literature review of animal reintroductions and translocations ............................. 2 2.1. Introduction and definitions ............................................................................................. 2 2.2. Common issues associated with reintroduction programs............................................. 3 2.2.1. Expense....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2. Available habitat ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Critically Endangered Arabian Leopards Panthera Pardus Nimr Persist in the Jabal Samhan Nature Reserve, Oman
    Oryx Vol 40 No 3 July 2006 Critically Endangered Arabian leopards Panthera pardus nimr persist in the Jabal Samhan Nature Reserve, Oman James Andrew Spalton, Hadi Musalam al Hikmani, David Willis and Ali Salim Bait Said Abstract Between 1997 and 2000 a survey of the unrecorded in Jabal Samhan. Although people are Arabian subspecies of leopard Panthera pardus nimr mostly absent from the Reserve there is some conflict was conducted in the little known Jabal Samhan Nature between leopards and shepherds who live outside the Reserve in southern Oman. Using camera-traps 251 Reserve. The numbers and activities of frankincense photographic records were obtained of 17 individual harvesters in the Reserve need to be managed to leopards; nine females, five males, two adults of safeguard the leopard and its habitat. The main unknown sex and one cub. Leopards were usually challenge for the future is to find ways whereby local solitary and trail use and movements suggested large communities can benefit from the presence of the ranges characterized by spatial sharing but little Reserve and from the leopards that the Reserve seeks temporal overlap. More active by day than night in to safeguard. undisturbed areas, overall the leopards exhibited two peaks in activity, morning and evening. The survey also Keywords Arabia, Arabian leopard, camera-traps, provided records of leopard prey species and first Dhofar, Jabal Samhan, leopards, Oman, Panthera pardus records of nine Red List mammal species previously nimr. Introduction thought to have come from Jabal Samhan in 1947, and a further specimen was obtained elsewhere in Dhofar in The Arabian subspecies of leopard Panthera pardus nimr 1947–1948 (Harrison, 1968).
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Facts San Joaquin Kit
    Endangered SpecU.S. Environmental iesFacts Protection Agency San Joaquin Kit Fox Vulpes macrot is mutica Description and Ecology Status Endangered, listed March 11, 1967. Critical Habitat Not designated. current distribution records include the Antioch area of Contra Costa County. Appearance The average male San Joaquin kit fox measures about 32 inches in length (of which 12 inches is the Habitat Because the San Joaquin kit fox requires dens length of its tail). It stands 12 inches high at the shoulder, for shelter, protection and reproduction, a habitat’s soil and weighs about 5 pounds. The female is a little smaller. type is important. Loose-textured soils are preferable, but The San Joaquin kit fox is the smallest canid species in North modification of the burrows of other animals facilitates America (but the largest kit fox subspecies). Its foot pads denning in other soil types. The historical native vegetation of are also small and distinct from other canids in its range, the Valley was largely annual grassland (“California Prairie”) averaging 1.2 inches long and 1 inch wide. The legs are long, and various scrub and subshrub communities. Vernal pool, the body slim, and the large ears are set close together. The alkali meadows and playas still provide support habitat, but B. Moose Pet erson, U.S. Fish Serviceand Wildlife B. Moose Pet nose is slim and pointed. The tail, typically carried low and have wet soils unsuitable for denning. Some of the habitat has been converted to an agricultural patchwork of row The San Joaquin kit fox is straight, tapers slightly toward its distinct black tip.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Kit Fox CESA Petition 3-10-13
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List the Desert Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act Photo © CDFG 2012 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PETITIONER March 10, 2013 Citation: Kadaba, Dipika, Ileene Anderson, Curt Bradley and Shaye Wolf 2013. A Petition to List the Desert Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act. Submitted to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife – March 2013. Pgs. 58. Table of Contents Executive Summary..............................................................................................................................4 I. Population Trends.......................................................................................................................5 II. Range and Distribution ...............................................................................................................5 III. Abundance ...................................................................................................................................8 IV. Life History..................................................................................................................................8 A. Species Description ...................................................................................................................8 B. Taxonomy...................................................................................................................................9 C. Reproduction
    [Show full text]