Chatburn Ward Profile

Home , Chatburn, Ramsgreave, Twiston

CONTENTS

1 POPULATION, AGE AND ETHNICITY 2 DEPRIVATION 3 MOSAIC DATA

4 EDUCATION 5 EMPLOYMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT 6 HEALTH

7 HOUSING AND TENURE

8 CRIME 9 AREA MAP 10 KEY RESOURCES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

Chatburn

Population: 1,316 Households: 565

LSOA’s: E01025321

Ward Profile – Chatburn

BACKGROUND

This ward profile is part of series providing key statistical data for each of the 24 wards which make up the district of Ribble Valley. The aim of this profile is to describe the key characteristics of each ward – demography, housing and employment in the context of the rest of Ribble Valley, regionally and nationally. This ward profile supplements the larger Ribble Valley profile, which provides a more comprehensive picture of the district.

The ward includes the following areas: Chatburn, Downham and Twiston.

Points of Interest

Chatburn - the village can be dated back to Anglo-Saxon times and takes its name from one of the most distinguished characters of that time, St Chad. A feature of the village is the spire of the parish church, which was erected around 1838. The steeple was struck by lightning in 1854, but was rebuilt in the same year. The village had its own railway station, but it was closed in 1962 before the report of Dr Beeching. Chatburn Post Office was bombed during the Second World War.

Downham - The 2nd Lord Clitheroe does not allow overhead electricity lines, aerials or satellite dishes in the village, making the village a popular location for filming period dramas. Downham was one of the locations used in the 1961 film Whistle Down the Wind, and the BBC One series Born and Bred, set in the fictional village of Ormston, was also filmed in the village. The 2012 BBC drama "The Secret Of Crickley Hall" was also filmed in and around Downham. The Assheton family is responsible for keeping the village and surrounding well managed estate, including the farms and some of the houses in neighbouring Twiston, in its present unblemished condition. None of the properties on the estate are privately owned. The manor has been in the family’s ownership since 1558 and has passed through a direct male line of the Assheton’s since 1680. The village pub ‘The Assheton Arms’ and the Post Office shop and tearooms cater for visitors year round. A thriving pre-school on the Main Street uses the former village school premises and the village hall on Pendle Road is well supported by several local clubs and groups with frequent events and activities.

The ward has one borough Conservative councillor - Cllr Gary Scott

Cllr Gary Scott 01200 441775 [email protected] 2

OVERVIEW

•Chatburn's ward population in 2011 stood at •Chatburn has the Living Environment domain •The ward is mainly a mix of the following main •Chatburn has one school within the ward. 1,316. in the bottom 40%. socio-economic groups: •Just over 21.3% of residents have no •The ward is more sparsely populated (0.8 •Residents of isolated rural communities qualifications; this is lower than the Ribble people per hectare) than the average for the •Residents of small and mid-sized towns with Valley figure of 18% and much lower than the borough (1 person per hecatare). strong local roots national figure of 27%. •The ward has a higher percentage of residents •Wealthy people living in the most sought- •29.5% of the residents of the ward have a level aged 45 to 64 and a lower percentage of after neighbourhoods 4 educational qualification compared to nearly residents aged 0 to 19, and 30-44 compared to 34% in Ribble Valley and only 25% in the national, Lancashire and district averages. Lancashire. •99.24% of residents in the ward are White.

Population Deprivation Mosaic Education

•73.04% of working age people (16-74) in the •79.26% of respondents in the ward indicated •Recorded crime in Chatburn is 27.4 per 1,000 •The ward consists of 565 households, an ward are classed as economically active. their day to day activities are not limited due population compared to 31.7 as the Ribble increase of 11 between the 2001 and 2011 to health or disability, this is a slightly higher Valley district average and 63.5 as the Census. rate than the average for the borough with Lancashire County average (February 2014 – •63.9% of households are owner occupiers. 83.29%. 10.11% indicated they were limited a January 2015). The rented sector consists of 34.3% of lot. •There were 190.7 calls to the Police, 115.5 households, with the majority being private •A high percentage of respondents (79.03%) in calls to Ambulance services and 7.6 calls to rented stock. the ward rate their general health as good or Fire and Rescue services per 1,000 population •Chatburn has a high percentage (50.97%) of very good. in the ward. terraced properties. •In the same period there were 15.2 calls per 1,000 population made to the Police regarding anti-social behaviour.

Employment Health Crime Housing

1 POPULATION, AGE AND ETHNICITY

POPULATION

• The population of Chatburn according to the 2011 Census is 1,316 (made up of 628 males Ribble Valley Population by Ward and 688 females). Chatburn is much smaller than the average size in terms of population. Whalley 3895 • When looking at density of population (number of persons per hectare) the ward is more Wiswell and Pendleton 1316 sparsely populated (0.8 people per hectare) than the average for the borough (1 person per Wilpshire hectare). The England average is 4.1 people per hectare. 2582 Waddington and West Bradford 2933 St Mary's 2846 Salthill 3135

Sabden 1422 Ribchester 1598 Read and Simonstone 2573

Primrose 3075 Mellor 2672 Littlemoor 2936 Langho 2261

Gisburn, Rimington 1405 Edisford and Low Moor 2773 Dilworth 2551 Derby and Thornley 2995

Clayton-le-Dale with Ramsgreave 2633 Chipping 1356 Chatburn 1316

Bowland, Newton and Slaidburn 1325 Billington and Old Langho 3154 Alston and Hothersall 2643

Aighton, Bailey and Chaigley 1737

0 2000 4000 6000

Source: ONS, Census 2011 Source: ONS, Census 2011

AGE STRUCTURE

• The ward has a higher percentage of residents aged 45 to 64 in comparison to the national, Lancashire and Ribble Valley average and a lower percentage of residents aged 0 to 19, and 30-44 compared to the national, Lancashire and district average. • A high percentage of Chatburn residents are aged 45 to 64.

All Ages 0-9 10-19 20-44 45-64 65+

Chatburn 1,316 118 139 366 398 295

8.97% 10.56% 27.81% 30.24% 22.42%

Source: ONS, Census 2011

Projected growth in Ribble Valley population by age

• ONS projected population growth for the borough is 64,800 by 2035.

Source: ONS, 2010 – based Sub-National Population Projections (2012)

Ethnicity Profile

• 99.24% of residents in Chatburn are White. This is higher than the Ribble Valley average and higher than the England average.

% Chatburn Ribble Valley England White 99.24 96.59 81.41 Mixed 0.15 0.53 1.86 Asian 0.15 0.93 5.57 Chinese/Other Asian 0.00 0.25 1.86 Black or Black British 0.08 0.21 3.24 Other Ethnic Group 0.8 1.54 7.04

Source: ONS, 2011 Census

2 DEPRIVATION

The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 (IMD) measures deprivation down to Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) level – areas containing around 1,500 people. 32,482 LSOAs (nationally) make up the IMD with each area being scored across 8 domains (see below) then ranked from most to least deprived, with the 326 English districts also being ranked. Ribble Valley is made up of 40 LSOAs.

Health Index of Multiple Education, Skills Barriers to Living Income Employment Deprivation Deprivation Crime Decile and Training Housing and Environment Decile Decile and Disability Decile (IMD) Decile Services Decile Decile Decile LSOA Ward E01025321 Chatburn 8 7 7 6 10 8 9 4

(where 1 st decile is most deprived, 10 th decile is least deprived)

The table above shows the eight IMD domains split by LSOA and ranks all LSOAs nation-wide. Those areas most deprived are ranked in the top 10% - the 1 st decile (red) and the least deprived are the higher numbers (green). As can be seen Chatburn has the Living Environment domain in the bottom 40%.

What do the Ranks mean?

Education Skills and Training - measures the extent of deprivation in terms of education, skills and training in an area. The indicators are structured into two sub-domains: one relating to children and young people and one relating to adult skills.

Crime - measures the rate of recorded crime in an area for four major crime types representing the risk of personal and material victimisation at a small area level.

Employment - measures employment deprivation in an area conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the labour market.

Barriers to Housing and Other Services - measures the physical and financial accessibility of housing and key local services. The indicators fall into two sub-domains: ‘geographical barriers’, which relate to the physical proximity of local services, and ‘wider barriers’ which includes issues relating to access to housing such as affordability.

Health and Disability - measures premature death and the impairment of quality of life by poor health. It considers both physical and mental health. The domain measures morbidity, disability and premature mortality but not aspects of behaviour or environment that may be predictive of future health deprivation.

Income - measures the proportion of the population in an area experiencing deprivation related to low income.

Living Environment - measures the quality of individuals’ immediate surroundings both within and outside the home. The indicators fall into two sub-domains: the ‘indoors’ living environment, which measures the quality of housing, and the ‘outdoors’ living environment which contains two measures relating to air quality and road traffic accidents.

3 MOSAIC DATA

Mosaic UK is Experian’s system for classification of UK households. It is one of a number of commercially available geodemographic segmentation systems, applying the principles of geodemography to consumer household and individual data collated from a number of governmental and commercial sources. The current version, Mosaic UK 2009, classifies the UK population into 15 main socio-economic groups and, within this, 67 different types.

Mosaic has found application outside their original purpose of direct marketing, including governmental estimates and forecasts, and it is also used extensively in understanding local service users. Mosaic also introduced Mosaic Public Sector with more politically correct segment names.

Mosaic 2010 Classifications

Group Distinct Types

A02 - Retirees A03 - Remote A01 - Rural A04 - Villagers electing to settle communities Residents of families with with few well in with poor A isolated rural high incomes paid alternatives environmentally access to public communities” - often from to agricultural attractive and commercial city jobs employment localities services B05 - Better B07 - Empty B08 - Mixed B06 – Self- Residents of small off empty nester owner communities with employed trades and mid-sized nesters in low occupiers many single B people living in towns with strong density making little use people in the smaller local roots” estates on of public centres of small communities town fringes services towns C09 - C10 - Wealthy C11 - Creative Successful C12 - Residents Wealthy people families in professionals older in smart city living in the most substantial seeking C business centre flats who sought-after houses with little involvement in leaders living make little use of neighbourhoods” community local in sought-after public services involvement communities suburbs D15 - Well off Successful D13 - Higher D16 - Higher D14 - Older commuters professionals income older income families people living in living in D living in suburban champions of concerned with large houses in spacious or semi-rural village education and mature suburbs houses in semi- homes communities careers rural settings E17 - E21 - Middle E19 – Self- Comfortably E18 - Industrial E20 - Upwardly aged families Middle income reliant older off suburban workers living mobile South living in less families living in families in E families comfortably in Asian families fashionable moderate suburban semis weakly tied to owner occupied living in inter war inter war suburban semis in industrial their local semis suburbs suburban towns community semis

Group Distinct Types

Residents K49 - Low F23 - Early F24 - Young K50 - Older F22 - Busy F25 - Personnel with K48 - Middle income older Couples with middle aged parents new to families in low K51 - Often executives in reliant on the sufficient aged couples couples long young children in parents likely to their value housing indebted families F town houses Ministry of K incomes in and families in established in comfortable be involved in neighbourhood - in traditional living in low rise in dormitory Defence for right-to-buy right-to-buy former modern housing their children's keen to put industrial estates settlements public services social homes council education down roots areas housing estates L54 - Retired G30 - Diverse L52 - G28 - Singles Active L53 - people of G26 - Well G29 - Young communities Communities L55 - Capable G27 - City and sharers elderly Residents in modest educated professional of well- of wealthy older people dwellers owning occupying people living retirement - means singles living families settling educated L older people leasing / owning L houses in older converted in pleasant second home commonly in purpose in better quality singles living living in large flats in purpose neighbourhoods Victorian retirement and tourist living in built flats older terraces in smart - seaside built blocks houses locations communities seaside Young, well- small flats houses bungalows G educated city G31 - Owners dwellers M56 - Older in smart G32 - Students G33 - Transient G34 - Students people living M57 - Old M58 - Less M59 - People purpose built Elderly and other singles - poorly involved in on social people in flats mobile older living in social flats in people transient singles supported by college and M housing subsisting on people accommodation prestige reliant on in multi-let family and university estates with welfare requiring a designed for locations - state support houses neighbours communities limited payments degree of care older people many newly budgets built N60 - Tenants N61 - N64 - Diverse H35 - H36 - Young H37 - Young in social Childless N62 - Young N63 - homesharers Couples and Childless new H38 - People singles and owners and housing flats tenants in renters in flats Multicultural renting small young singles in owner living in brand H sharers renting rented Young on estates at social with a tenants renting flats in small modern occupiers in new residential small purpose developments of people risk of serious housing flats cosmopolitan flats in areas of densely starter homes cramped new developments built flats mixed tenure renting flats social with modest mix social housing populated homes N in high problems social needs areas I43 - Older density N65 - Young I39 - Young I40 - Multi-ethnic I41 - Renters of I42 - South Asian town centres social singles in owners and communities in older terraces in communities terraces with housing multi-ethnic private renters newer suburbs ethnically experiencing transient - communities - in inner city away from the diverse social deprivation single many in high terraces inner city communities Lower income populations rise flats workers in urban O68 - I O67 - Older terraces in often I44 - Low Families in Families with O69 - tenants on Families in diverse areas income low-rise varied Vulnerable low rise social low-rise social families social structures young parents O housing O housing with occupying housing with living on low needing estates where high levels of poor quality high levels of rise social substantial jobs are benefit need older terraces benefit need housing state support scarce estates J45 - Low Owner occupiers J46 - Residents J47 - income in older-style in blue collar Comfortably off communities J housing, typically communities industrial Unclassified reliant on low in ex-industrial revitalised by workers owning skill industrial areas commuters their own homes jobs

4 EDUCATION

• Chatburn has one school within the ward – this being Chatburn Church of England Primary School. Performance information is provided below. Chatburn Church of England Primary School School type Voluntary Aided Pupil ages 4 - 11 Number of pupils 114 % with special educational needs 2.6% % of pupils that are eligible for free school meals SUPP Ofsted grading ‘Outstanding‘ – October 2012

Chatburn Church of England Primary School - Performance Information 2014 KS2 Performance Tables last update: (March 2015) Year on year comparisons KS2 test results and progress Percentage achieving Level 4 or All above in reading, writing and 2012 2013 2014 maths pupils

School Pupils eligible for KS2 assessment 100% 94% 89% 19 LA 76% 77% 81% Percentage achieving level 3 or below in reading, writing and maths 0% England - All Schools 75% 75% 78% Percentage achieving level 4 or above in reading, writing and maths 89% Percentage achieving level 4B or above in reading and maths and level 4 or above in writing 89% Percentage achieving level 5 or above in reading, writing and maths 11% Percentage of pupils making at least 2 levels of progress in reading 95% Percentage of pupils making at least 2 levels of progress in writing 84% Percentage of pupils making at least 2 levels of progress in maths 84% Average point score 30.0 Source: http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/performance/index.html

• 21.3% of residents have no qualifications; this is higher than the Ribble

Valley figure of 18.3% but much lower than the Lancashire figure of nearly 24%, the North West level of 24% and the national figure of 22.5%. • Level 4 and above qualifications cover: Degree (BA, BSc), Higher

Degree (MA, PhD), NVQ Level 4-5, HNC, HND, RSA Higher Diploma,

BTEC Higher level, Professional Qualifications (Teaching, Nursing and Accountancy). 29.5% of the residents of the ward have achieved this level of education compared to 34% in Ribble Valley, 25% in Lancashire and 27% in England.

Source: ONS, 2011 Census

5 EMPLOYMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT

• According to the findings from the 2011 Census 73.04% of working age people (16-74) in Chatburn are classed as economically active, higher than the Lancashire figure of 68.11% the England figure of 69.91% and the Ribble Valley figure of 71.87%. • Unemployment is low in the ward at 1.67% in comparison to the England figure of 4.38%, the Ribble Valley figure of 2.06% and the Lancashire figure of 3.76%. • Economic inactivity in the ward can mostly be apportioned to being ‘retired’. • A very small percentage of the working age population of the ward are claiming Job Seekers Allowance as at January 2015 (0.4%) less than the figure for Ribble Valley (0.7%) and lower than that for Great Britain (2.0%).

Job Seekers Allowance (JSA)

• The Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) is payable to people under pensionable age who are available for, and actively seeking, work.

Total JSA claimants (January 2015)

Chipping (%) Ribble Valley (%) Great Britain (%)

All people 0.4 0.7 2.0

Males 0.8 0.8 2.6

Females 0.0 0.5 1.4 Source: claimant count with rates and proportions Note: The percentage figures show the number of JSA claimants as a proportion of resident population aged 16- 64. • Information from the DWP regarding benefit payments is currently unavailable for Chatburn.

Source: ONS, 2011 Census

6 HEALTH

• In the 2011 Census 79.26% of respondents in the ward indicated that their day to day activities are not limited due to health or disability, this is a slightly lower rate than the average for the borough with 83.29%. 10.11% indicated they were limited a lot (Ribble Valley 7.13%), which is lower than the Lancashire figure of 9.85%. • A high percentage of respondents (79.03%) in Chatburn rate their health as good or very good. • The health of people in Ribble Valley is generally better than the England average. Deprivation is lower than average, however about 6.6% (600) of children live in poverty. Life expectancy for both men and women is higher than the England average. Life expectancy is not significantly different for people in the most deprived areas of Ribble Valley than in the least deprived areas. • Child health - In Year 6, 11.4% (67) of children are classified as obese, better than the average for England. The rate of alcohol specific hospital stays among those under 18 was 57.9*. 1 This represents 7 stays per year. Levels of breastfeeding and smoking at time of delivery are worse than the England average. Levels of GCSE attainment are better than the England average. • Adult health - In 2012, 18.6% of adults were classified as obese, better than the average for England. The rate of alcohol related harm hospital stays was 522*, better than the average for England. This represents 300 stays per year. The rate of self-harm hospital stays was 154.5*. This represents 81 stays per year. The rate of smoking related deaths was 309*. This represents 111 deaths per year. The rate of people killed and seriously injured on roads is worse than average. Rates of sexually transmitted infections and TB are better than average. Rates of statutory homelessness, violent crime, long term unemployment and drug misuse are better than average. • Local priorities - priorities in Ribble Valley include alcohol harm reduction, long term conditions including dementia and access from rural settings.

Source: ONS, 2011 Census

1 * rate per 100,000 population 13

7 HOUSING AND TENURE

• Chatburn consists of 565 households. The number of households in the ward has increased by 11 between the 2001 and 2011 Census. • 63.9% of households are owner occupiers. The rented sector consists of 34.3% of households, with the majority being private rented stock. • 2.1% of households do not have central heating. 2.2 is the average household size. The average number of rooms per household is 5.7. The average number of bedrooms per household is 2.7. • Chatburn has a high percentage (50.97%) of terraced properties. • The largest household type in the ward is ‘One person Household: Other,’ accounting for 17%, followed by ‘Married or same-sex civil partnership couple; dependent children’ this accounts for 15.6% of all households. • 0.91% of the residential population have a second address outside the UK and 2.43% have a second address within the UK.

Source: ONS, 2011 Census

8 CRIME

• Recorded crime in Chatburn is 27.4 per 1,000 population compared to 31.7 as the Ribble Valley district average and 63.5 as the Lancashire County average (February 2014 – January 2015). • There were 190.7 calls to the Police, 115.5 calls to Ambulance services and 7.6 calls to Fire and Rescue services per 1,000 population in the ward. • In the same period there were 15.2 calls per 1,000 population made to the Police regarding anti-social behaviour.

Source: http://www.saferlancashire.co.uk/2011/statistics/index.asp

Actual Crimes/Incidents Rate per thousand population, except for Domestic Burglary which is rate per thousand households February 2013 February 2014 February 2013 February 2014 Ribble Valley District Lancashire County to January to January Year on Year Percentage to January to January Average (February 2014 Average (February 2014 2014 2015 Difference Change 2014 2015 to January 2015) to January 2015) Calls to the Police 269 251 -18 -6.7% 204.4 190.7 204.5 357.4 Calls to the Ambulance Services 157 152 -5 -3.2% 119.3 115.5 104.9 148 Calls to the Fire & Rescue 6 10 4 66.7% 4.6 7.6 6.1 10.3 Services

Total Recorded Crime 24 36 12 50% 18.2 27.4 31.7 63.5

Violence Against The Person 0 6 6 n/c 0 4.6 7.1 15.5 Calls to the Police about 6 3 -3 -50% 4.6 2.3 5.3 15.5 Domestic Violence Calls to the Ambulance Service 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0.3 0.9 where violence involved All Drug Offences 2 1 -1 -50% 1.5 0.8 0.9 2.1 Numbers Killed or Serious 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0.4 0.3 Injured on the Roads

Serious Acquisitive Crime 7 8 1 14.3% 5.3 6.1 5.7 8.9 Robbery 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0.1 0.4 All Burglary 3 4 1 33.3% 5.3 7.1 12.6 20.2 Domestic Burglaries 1 0 -1 n/c 1.8 0 4.4 8.2 All Vehicle Crime 6 8 2 33.3% 4.6 6.1 4.4 5.9 Theft of a Vehicle 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0.7 1.2 Theft from a Vehicle 6 8 2 33.3% 4.6 6.1 3.1 3.9 All Criminal Damage (including 4 9 5 125% 3 6.8 4.5 10.9 Arson) Deliberate Fires 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0.2 1.7 Deliberate Vehicle Fires 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 Calls to the Police about Anti- 22 20 -2 -9.1% 16.7 15.2 27.3 53.6 Social Behaviour

Source: http://www.saferlancashire.co.uk/2011/statistics/statistics.asp

9 Area Map

10 Key resources for further information

• statistics.gov.uk – The Office for National Statistics’ main website (ONS) • neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk – A subset of the ONS website which collates and presents socio-demographic data available at different geographical levels • nomisweb.co.uk – A subset of the ONS website which collates and presents labour market statistics • data.gov.uk – Single, searchable website of all public data collated and used by public agencies • saferlancashire.co.uk – A searchable website of crime statistics for Lancashire and used by public agencies • Education.gov.uk – A searchable website for the performance of all schools in England and Wales • http://www.saferlancashire.co.uk/2011/statistics/index.asp - Safer Lancashire Crime Statistics