DOCSLIB.ORG

Paranotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1973, a New Synonym of Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paranotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1973, a New Synonym of Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280997631 Paranotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1973, a new synonym of Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) Article in Zootaxa · May 2013 DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3652.3.8 · Source: PubMed CITATION READS 1 325 2 authors: Petr Kment Dávid Rédei National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic National Chung Hsing University 220 PUBLICATIONS 1,314 CITATIONS 111 PUBLICATIONS 1,010 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Systematics, taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of West-Palaearctic Velia View project Cataloguing the types of insects in the National Museum, Prague View project All content following this page was uploaded by Petr Kment on 24 December 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Zootaxa 3652 (3): 397–400 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3652.3.8 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:092EAC56-02A9-4C7E-BE3A-3A169DA4CACB Paranotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1973, a new synonym of Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) PETR KMENT1) & DÁVID RÉDEI2) 1) Department of Entomology, National Museum, Kunratice 1, CZ-14800 Praha 4, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] 2) Institute of Entomology, Nankai University, 300071 Tianjin, Weijin Road 94, China. E-mail: [email protected] The tribe Phyllomorphini Mulsant & Rey, 1870 of the family Coreidae, subfamily Coreinae, is represented in the Palaearctic Region by three genera (Pephricus Amyot & Serville, 1843, Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833, and Tongorma Kirkaldy, 1900) and four species. Two of them, Pephricus subtilis Montandon, 1913 and Tongorma latreillii (Guérin-Méneville, 1839) are known only from Yemen and represent Afrotropical faunal elements in the Arabian Peninsula. The only truly Palaearctic genus is therefore Phyllomorpha, comprising two species—P. lacerata Herrich-Schäffer, 1835 and P. laciniata (Villers, 1789)—distributed in southern Europe, North Africa, and western Asia from Turkey to Oman, Central Asia, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (Dolling 2006). Ahmad & Shadab (1974) described another monotypic genus from the Pakistani province of Baluchistan, Pronotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1974 (type species Paranotocoris echinus Ahmad & Shadab, 1974). Recent study of the original descriptions of both of the taxa drove us to the conclusion that Pronotocoris is a junior subjective synonym of Phyllomorpha, and Pronotocoris echinus a junior subjective synonym of Phyllomorpha lacerata. Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833 Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833: 47. Selected as correct original spelling and placed on the Official List of Generic Names in Zoology (ICZN 2008: Opinion 2198). Type species: Coreus hystrix Latreille, 1817 (= Phyllomorpha laciniata (Villers, 1789)) by subsequent designation (Reuter 1888: 414). Phyllomorphus: Laporte (1833: 41). Incorrect original spelling, placed on the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Generic Names (ICZN 2008: Opinion 2198). Craspedum Rambur, 1839: 138. Unnecessary new name for Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833. Phyllophya Stål, 1873: 80. Synonymized by Horváth (1889: 326). Type species: Phyllomorpha persica Westwood, 1841 (= Phyllomorpha lacerata Herrich-Schäffer, 1835) by monotypy. Paranotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1974: 181, syn. nov. Hereby fixed as correct original spelling under Article 24.2.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999). Type species: Paranotocoris echinus Ahmad & Shadab, 1974, by original designation. Paranotocornis: Ahmad & Shadab (1974: 181). Incorrect original spelling. Paranotocoris: Ahmad et al. (1977: 6, 24) (key to genera, catalogue); Ahmad (1979: 7) (key to tribes and genera); Ahmad (1980: 122, 131) (checklist). Taxonomy. Ahmad & Shadab (1974) described the new genus, provided illustrations of habitus, metathoracic scent gland peritreme, hemelytron, hindwing, abdominal trichobothrial pattern, and male genitalia (pygophore, paramere, and phallus), and compared it to other related genera. According to them Paranotocoris ‘... can be easily distinguished from all other genera of the tribe Phyllomorphini by the following characters: body with large and small spines all over, except on third and fourth antennal segments and distal portion of tibiae and tarsi; basal antennal segment very long, longer than third and fourth segments combined; and labium reaching beyond the anterior margin of fourth abdominal venter.’ However, characters of the antennae (antennal segment I long, antennal segments II and III unarmed) and legs (tibiae unarmed except of two spines frequently present at their extreme base), considered as of generic significance by Ahmad & Shadab (1974), perfectly fit Phyllomorpha lacerata, and they are universally considered in the literature as diagnostic for Ph. lacerata at the species level, Accepted by C. Schaefer: 15 Apr. 2013; published: 17 May 2013 397 differentiating it from Ph. laciniata (e.g., Stichel 1959, Gidayatov 1982, Moulet 1995). The apex of labium extends from base of abdominal sternite III to middle of abdominal sternite IV in various specimens of Ph. lacerata examined by us, therefore P. echinus falls within the variability range of Ph. lacerata, and otherwise this character obviously does not have generic importance. Comparison of the description and illustrations of P. echinus with specimens of Ph. lacerata deposited in the collections of the National Museum, Praha, and Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest left no doubt that the two are conspecific. For this reason, we consider Paranotocoris Ahmad & Shadab, 1974, syn. nov., a junior subjective synonym of Phyllomorpha Laporte, 1833. FIGURE 1. Habitus of Phyllomorpha lacerata Herrich-Schäffer, 1835. Specimen from Syria, Bludan, 6.v.2008, V. Skoupý lgt., P. Kment det., coll. P. Horsák (Photo: Z. Chalupa). Nomenclature. The genus name is spelled Paranotocoris throughout the paper (Ahmad & Shadab 1974), but an alternative spelling Paranotocornis occurs once on page 181, apparently as a result of inadvertent error. Therefore Paranotocoris is hereby fixed as the correct original spelling under Article 24.2.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999). Note. Burmeister (1835: 310), acting as First Reviser, selected Phyllomorphus as the correct original spelling. Westwood (1840: 484) validly designated Cimex paradoxus Sparrmann, 1777 (= Pephricus paradoxus 398 · Zootaxa 3652 (3) © 2013 Magnolia Press KMENT & RÉDEI (Sparrmann, 1777)) as the type species of Phyllomorphus (Dolling 2006, Kerzhner 2007). These acts were set aside by Opinion 2198 (ICZN 2008). Phyllomorpha lacerata Herrich-Schäffer, 1835 Phyllomorpha laceratus Herrich-Schäffer, 1835: 41, 73. Phyllomorpha persica Westwood, 1841: 8. Synonymized by Horváth (1889: 326). Paranotocoris echinus Ahmad & Shadab, 1974: 181–186, figs 1–8, syn. nov. Holotype: male, Pakistan, Baluchistan, Mekran, 8 mile to Turbat on Kalat and Turbat Highway, 24.iv.1969, I. Ahmad lgt. (coll. Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, University of Karachi). Paranotocoris echinus: Ahmad et al. (1977: 14: figs 4, 24, 37) (catalogue, habitus figure); Ahmad (1979: 42) (checklist); Ahmad (1980: 131) (checklist). Taxonomy. As it was discussed above, the original description and illustrations of Paranotocoris echinus fit perfectly the characters of Ph. lacerata. In spite of occurrence of Ph. lacerata in the neighbouring regions of Afghanistan and Iran (including the Iranian province of Sistan and Baluchistan) (see Wagner 1961, 1968; Kiritshenko 1963; Brown 1966; Hoberlandt 1989; Hoberlandt & Švihla 1990; Linnavuori 2007, 2012; Ghahari et al. 2012), the latter species was omitted by the authors when diagnosing P. e ch i nu s . We propose the following new subjective synonymy: Paranotocoris echinus Ahmad & Shadab, 1974, syn. nov. = Phyllomorpha lacerata Herrich- Schäffer, 1835. Distribution. Southern Europe (Albania, Greece, Italy, ?Yugoslavia), North Africa (Algeria), Near East (Asian Turkey, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria), Transcaucasia (Azerbaijan, Armenia), Central Asia (Asian Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan), Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (Dolling 2006). There seems to be no reliable record published from the former Yugoslavia (see Protić 2001). Acknowledgements We are greatful to Mick D. Webb and William R. Dolling (Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom) for sharing part of their manuscript of the Coreoidea World Catalogue. We are also indebted to Zdeněk Chalupa and Petr Horsák (both Kladno, Czech Republic) for the permission to include their photo of Ph. lacerata. This study was partly supported by the grant of the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO MK-S 760/2013/12 OVV) to P. Kment and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (20110490769) to D. Rédei. References Ahmad, I. (1979) A revision of the superfamilies Coreoidea and Pentatomoidea (Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha) from Pakistan, Azad Kashmir and Bangladesh. Part 1: Additions and corrections of Coreid and Pentatomid fauna with phylogenetic considerations. Supplement of the Entomological Society of Karachi, 4 (1), 1–113. Ahmad, I. (1980) Insect fauna of Pakistan and Azad Kashmir—some groups within the order Hemiptera. Proceedings of the Pakistan Congress of Zoology, 1, 115–155. Ahmad, I. &
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Faune De France Hémiptères Coreoidea Euro-Méditerranéens
    1 FÉDÉRATION FRANÇAISE DES SOCIÉTÉS DE SCIENCES NATURELLES 57, rue Cuvier, 75232 Paris Cedex 05 FAUNE DE FRANCE FRANCE ET RÉGIONS LIMITROPHES 81 HÉMIPTÈRES COREOIDEA EUROMÉDITERRANÉENS Addenda et Corrigenda à apporter à l’ouvrage par Pierre MOULET Illustré de 3 planches de figures et d'une photographie couleur 2013 2 Addenda et Corrigenda à apporter à l’ouvrage « Hémiptères Coreoidea euro-méditerranéens » (Faune de France, vol. 81, 1995) Pierre MOULET Museum Requien, 67 rue Joseph Vernet, F – 84000 Avignon [email protected] Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann, 1910 (France) Photo J.-C. STREITO 3 Depuis la parution du volume Coreoidea de la série « Faune de France », de nombreuses publications, essentiellement faunistiques, ont paru qui permettent de préciser les données bio-écologiques ou la distribution de nombreuses espèces. Parmi ces publications il convient de signaler la « Checklist » de FARACI & RIZZOTTI-VLACH (1995) pour l’Italie, celle de V. PUTSHKOV & P. PUTSHKOV (1997) pour l’Ukraine, la seconde édition du « Verzeichnis der Wanzen Mitteleuropas » par GÜNTHER & SCHUSTER (2000) et l’impressionnante contribution de DOLLING (2006) dans le « Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region ». En outre, certains travaux qui m’avaient échappé ou m’étaient inconnus lors de la préparation de cet ouvrage ont été depuis ré-analysés ou étudiés. Enfin, les remarques qui m’ont été faites directement ou via des notes scientifiques sont ici discutées ; MATOCQ (1996) a fait paraître une longue série de corrections à laquelle on se reportera avec profit. - - - Glandes thoraciques : p. 10 ─ Ligne 10, après « considérés ici » ajouter la note infrapaginale suivante : Toutefois, DAVIDOVA-VILIMOVA, NEJEDLA & SCHAEFER (2000) ont observé une aire d’évaporation chez Corizus hyoscyami, Liorhyssus hyalinus, Brachycarenus tigrinus, Rhopalus maculatus et Rh.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations Into Mating Disruption, Delayed Mating, and Multiple Mating in Oriental Beetle, Anomala Orientalis (Waterhouse) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-2005 Investigations into mating disruption, delayed mating, and multiple mating in oriental beetle, Anomala orientalis (Waterhouse) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Erik J. Wenninger University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Wenninger, Erik J., "Investigations into mating disruption, delayed mating, and multiple mating in oriental beetle, Anomala orientalis (Waterhouse) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)." (2005). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5748. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5748 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INVESTIGATIONS INTO MATING DISRUPTION, DELAYED MATING, AND MULTIPLE MATING IN ORIENTAL BEETLE, ANOMALA ORIENTALS (WATERHOUSE) (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE) A Dissertation Presented by ERIK J. WENNINGER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2005 Plant, Soil & Insect Sciences Entomology Division © Copyright by Erik J. Wenninger 2005 All Rights Reserved INVESTIGATIONS INTO MATING DISRUPTION, DELAYED MATING, AND MULTIPLE MATING IN ORIENTAL BEETLE, ANOMALA ORIENTALIS (WATERHOUSE), COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEIDAE A Dissertation Presented by ERIK J. WENNINGER Approved as to style and content by: Anne Averill, Chair Zii Joseph Elkinton, Member S Buonaccorsi, Member Peter Veneman, Department Head Department of Plant, Soil & Insect Sciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to Dr. Anne Averill for allowing me the freedom to seek my own path.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hemiptera: Insecta) in East Anatolia (Turkey) Received: 20-11-2017 Accepted: 21-12-2017
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(1): 1225-1231 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Additional faunıstıc notes on heteroptera JEZS 2018; 6(1): 1225-1231 © 2018 JEZS (HemIptera: Insecta) in East AnatolIa (Turkey) Received: 20-11-2017 Accepted: 21-12-2017 Barış Çerçi Barış Çerçi, İnanç Özgen and Paride Dioli Köknar 4, Tarçın Street, Koru Neighborhood Ardıçlı Abstract Houses, Esenyurt, İstanbul, The bugs Heteroptera collected in seven provinces of the East Anatolia (Bingöl, Bitlis, Elazığ, Erzincan, Turkey Malatya, Muş and Tunceli) were listed in the present study. It was based on a short but intensive collecting trip made in April-September 2014-2016. Eighty species were reported, many firstly recorded İnanç Özgen Fırat University, Engineering for collecting sites. From these species, 1 species belonging to each of the Ochteridae, Nabidae, Tingidae, Faculty, Bioengineering Artheneidae, Blissidae, Heterogastridae families, 10 species belonging to Miridae family, 7 species Department, Elazığ, Turkey belonging to Reduviidae family, 6 species belonging to Coreidae family, 10 species belonging to Rhopalidae family, 2 species belonging to each of the Alydidae, Berytidae, Geocoridae, Cydinidae and Paride Dioli Scutelleridae families, 17 species belonging to Lygaeidae family, 11 species belonging to Pentatomidae Museo di Storia Naturale Sezione family and 3 species belonging to Pyrrhocoridae family were obtained. The most of these species are new di Entomologia Corso Venezia record for these locations. 55- Milano- Italia Keywords: Hemiptera, heteroptera, fauna, East Anatolia, turkey, new regional record 1. Introduction Heteroptera species of the Eastern Turkey are still little known. The Heteroptera fauna of eastern part of Turkey is still little known compared to the one of the other parts of Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Hind Wing Venation of Coreidae (Heteroptera) a History of Misinterpretation
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE VOL. 39 1977 Hind wing venation of Coreidae (Heteroptera) a history of misinterpretation PAVEL STYS Department of Systematic Zoology, Charles University, Praha . ~ Several features of the hind wing venation were used- from St:U (1867) to Schaefer (1965) - as important distinguishing characters between the coreid subfamilies Coreinae and Pseudophloeinae ( = Arenocorihae) and were employed for consider­ ations on the taxonomic position of the genus Spathocera Stein, 1860 ( = Atractus Laporte, 1832 nee Wagler, 1828) * as well. Unfortunately, misunderstanding of classical morphological termjnology has caused a series of curious shifts in the meaning of chief diagnostic characters in the most important recent papers concerning Coreidae (China & Miller, 1959, Schaefer, 1965). The purpose of the present paper is to elucidate the situation.by illustrating the hind wing venation in a few repre­ sentative species of both subfamilies and then to follow the history of interpretations of its diagnostic features. This history is being written not to blame the outstanding authors mentioned above but to show how it might have happened that the large and well known subfamilies are characterized in. serious modern works by entirely wrong characters. In this respect the caf'lie is very instructive. Remjgium of Coreinae and Pseudophloeinae The following account refers to the structure of the anterior lobe ( = remigium) of the hind wing as studied in six selected illustrated species. Discussion is to be found at the end of the paper. ~ The proximal part of the costal margin is formed by closely joined and fused Se and R which are, however, still recognizable and in Phyllomorpha laciniata (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMALE REPRODUCTION and CONSPECIFIC UTILISATION in an EGG-CARRYING BUG -Who Carries, Who Cares?
    FEMALE REPRODUCTION AND MARI CONSPECIFIC UTILISATION IN KATVALA AN EGG-CARRYING BUG Department of Biology, University of Oulu -Who carries, who cares? OULU 2003 MARI KATVALA FEMALE REPRODUCTION AND CONSPECIFIC UTILISATION IN AN EGG-CARRYING BUG -Who carries, who cares? Academic Dissertation to be presented with the assent of the Faculty of Science, University of Oulu, for public discussion in Kuusamonsali (Auditorium YB210), Linnanmaa, on March 29th, 2003, at 12 noon. OULUN YLIOPISTO, OULU 2003 Copyright © 2003 University of Oulu, 2003 Reviewed by Docent Göran Arnqvist Docent Veijo Jormalainen ISBN 951-42-6969-1 (URL: http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514269691/) ALSO AVAILABLE IN PRINTED FORMAT Acta Univ. Oul. A 398, 2003 ISBN 951-42-6968-3 ISSN 0355-3191 (URL: http://herkules.oulu.fi/issn03553191/) OULU UNIVERSITY PRESS OULU 2003 Katvala, Mari, Female reproduction and conspecific utilisation in an egg-carrying bug -Who carries, who cares? Department of Biology, University of Oulu, P.O.Box 3000, FIN-90014 University of Oulu, Finland Oulu, Finland 2003 Abstract Female ability to exploit conspecifics in reproduction may have unusual expressions. I studied the reproductive behaviour of the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata; Heteroptera, Coreidae) experimentally in the field and in the laboratory. Female golden egg bugs lay their eggs mainly on the backs of conspecific males and other females. Non-parental eggs are often carried. Occasionally, the eggs are laid on the food plant (Paronychia spp; Polycarpea, Caryophyllaceae) of the species but typically, those eggs survive poorly due to egg parasitism and predation. I explored the dependence of female reproduction on conspecific presence and encounter rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Arthropod Interactions: a Behavioral Approach
    Psyche Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Guest Editors: Kleber Del-Claro, Monique Johnson, and Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Psyche Plant-Arthropod Interactions: A Behavioral Approach Guest Editors: Kleber Del-Claro, Monique Johnson, and Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved. This is a special issue published in “Psyche.” All articles are open access articles distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Editorial Board Toshiharu Akino, Japan Lawrence G. Harshman, USA Lynn M. Riddiford, USA Sandra Allan, USA Abraham Hefetz, Israel S. K. A. Robson, Australia Arthur G. Appel, USA John Heraty, USA C. Rodriguez-Saona, USA Michel Baguette, France Richard James Hopkins, Sweden Gregg Roman, USA Donald Barnard, USA Fuminori Ito, Japan David Roubik, USA Rosa Barrio, Spain DavidG.James,USA Leopoldo M. Rueda, USA David T. Bilton, UK Bjarte H. Jordal, Norway Bertrand Schatz, France Guy Bloch, Israel Russell Jurenka, USA Sonja J. Scheffer, USA Anna-karin Borg-karlson, Sweden Debapratim Kar Chowdhuri, India Rudolf H. Scheffrahn, USA M. D. Breed, USA Jan Klimaszewski, Canada Nicolas Schtickzelle, Belgium Grzegorz Buczkowski, USA Shigeyuki Koshikawa, USA Kent S. Shelby, USA Rita Cervo, Italy Vladimir Kostal, Czech Republic Toru Shimada, Japan In Sik Chung, Republic of Korea Opender Koul, India Dewayne Shoemaker, USA C. Claudianos, Australia Ai-Ping Liang, China Chelsea T. Smartt, USA David Bruce Conn, USA Paul Linser, USA Pradya Somboon, Thailand J. Corley, Argentina Nathan Lo, Australia George J. Stathas, Greece Leonardo Dapporto, Italy Jean N.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Synonym of Phyllomorpha Laciniata (Villers, 1789) (Heteroptera: Coreidae)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 31.xii.2005 Volume 45, pp. 19-20 ISSN 0374-1036 A new synonym of Phyllomorpha laciniata (Villers, 1789) (Heteroptera: Coreidae) Petr KMENT1,2) 1) Department of Entomology, National Museum, Kunratice 1, CZ-148 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 2) Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic Abstract. The following new synonymy is established: Phyllomorpha laciniata montandon Zange, 2005, syn. nov. = Phyllomorpha laciniata (Villers, 1789). Moreover, Phyllomorpha laciniata laciniata sensu ZANGE (2005) is a misidentifi- cation of Ph. lacerata Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835. Key words. Heteroptera, Coreidae, Phyllomorpha, Greece, new synonym In a recent but formally very unsatisfactory paper ignoring authoritative monographs on the Coreoidea, ZANGE (2005) described a new subspecies, Phyllomorpha laciniata montan- don Zange, 2005 from Greece, and compared it with the ‘nominotypical subspecies’. ZANGE (2005) gave the following distinguishing characters for Ph. l. laciniata – ‘Antennomere 1 strongly spinous, antennomeres 2-3 without spines, antennomere 4 clavate; rostrum reaching mesocoxae; coloration light-beige to light-brown; corium with bright, dark-brown bands and dark-brown punctures; membrane glassy translucent, its veins translucent’. He also indicated that the metatibiae are not spinous or only with scarce hairs at their upper margin and the body length ranges between 9 and 10 mm. Phyllomorpha l. monandon differs by ‘antennomeres 1-2 strongly spinous, antennomeres 2 (from its upper third), 3 and 4 without spines, antenno- mere 4 fusiform; coloration dark-brown; corium with bright, dark-brown bands and dark- brown punctures; ground colour dark-brown; membrane dark-brown, translucent, its veins externally strongly protruding, dark-brown’.
    [Show full text]
  • IGREJA ANDRE, Goncalo
    DOES SHAPE MATTER? THE EVOLUTION OF THE PENIS BONE Gonçalo Igreja André, BSc (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Western Australia Centre for Evolutionary Biology School of Biological Sciences 2020 2 Thesis Declaration I, Gonçalo Igreja André, certify that: This thesis has been substantially accomplished during enrolment in the degree. This thesis does not contain material that has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution. In the future, no part of this work will be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Western Australia (UWA) and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. This thesis does not contain any material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text and, where relevant, in the authorship declaration that follows. This thesis does not violate or infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other rights whatsoever of any person. The research reported in this thesis involved the use of the house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) and was assessed and approved by The University of Western Australian Research Ethics Committee (RA/3/100/1456). The research involving animals reported in this thesis followed The University of Western Australia and national standards for the care and use of laboratory animals. The research reported in this thesis was supported by ARC Discovery grants awarded to Leigh Simmons (DP 35000300).
    [Show full text]
  • Parental-Care Parasitism: How Do Unrelated Offspring Attain Acceptance by Foster Parents?
    Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arr041 Advance Access publication 26 April 2011 Forum: Invited Review Parental-care parasitism: how do unrelated offspring attain acceptance by foster parents? Marı´a Rolda´n and Manuel Soler Departamento de Biologı´a Animal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Severo Ochoa s/n, E-18071 Granada, Spain Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/22/4/679/296943 by guest on 01 October 2021 In this review, we describe a new term, ‘‘parental-care parasitism’’, that we define as the interaction in which an individual (the parasite) obtains reproductive benefits while reducing or completely eliminating its own costs of parenting by exploiting any type of offspring care provided by other individuals (the hosts). Parental-care parasitism comprises parasitic behaviors ranging from interactions in which just the nest is taken over to those where various combinations of nest, food and offspring care are parasitized. We subdivide parental-care parasitism into 3 categories depending on the strategy used by the parasite to reach host nest: 1) the parasite approaches the nest during host absence, 2) parasite and host adults meet at the nest but no aggression is carried out, or 3) the host tries to evict the parasite at the nest. We also discuss the costs and benefits for both parents and offspring, as well as for hosts and parasites, placing different forms of parental-care parasitism in an evolutionary context within the frameworks of both parental investment theory and coevolutionary arms race theory. Herein, we thoroughly discuss the lack of offspring discrimination found in some species, some populations of the same species and some individuals within the same population on the basis of the coevolutionary arms race theory, and the fact that unrelated offspring attain acceptance by foster parents, contrary to the general predictions of parental investment theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Predation and the Cost of Egg Carrying in the Golden Egg Bug: Experiments in the field
    OIKOS 89: 254–258. Copenhagen 2000 Ant predation and the cost of egg carrying in the golden egg bug: experiments in the field Arja Kaitala, Xavier Espadaler and Risto Lehtonen Kaitala, A., Espadaler, X. and Lehtonen, R. 2000. Ant predation and the cost of egg carrying in the golden egg bug: experiments in the field. – Oikos 89: 254–258. Golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata) females lay eggs on the backs of both female and male conspecifics. Bugs receive eggs voluntarily and involuntarily, and even when males carry eggs, many eggs are not fertilised by the carrier. Carrying the eggs of another individual is unexpected, particularly if egg carrying bears a cost in survival. We examined the predation risk associated with egg carrying experimentally in the field. P. laciniata individuals were enclosed with workers of one of two ant species, Pheidole pallidula or Cataglyphis piliscapus, which co-occur with the bug in the wild. Pheidole pallidula workers preyed on golden egg bugs and their eggs, but Cataglyphis piliscapus workers did not. In P. pallidula enclosures, golden egg bugs carrying larger egg loads were eaten first. These results suggest that golden egg bugs experience high predation pressure and that egg carrying increases the risk of predation. Due to the direct survival costs associated with egg carrying and the lack of relatedness between the eggs and the carrier, we suggest the golden egg bug as the first known intraspecific parasite in which parasitism is not related to active parental care. A. Kaitala, Dept of Biology, Uni6. of Oulu, Box 3000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland (arja.kaitala@oulu.fi).–X.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Egg Carrying in Phyllomorpha Laciniata Is Favoured by Natural Not Sexual Selection
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 75, 763e770 doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.029 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Male egg carrying in Phyllomorpha laciniata is favoured by natural not sexual selection M.GOMENDIO,F.GARCI´A-GONZA´ LEZ, P. REGUERA & A. RIVERO Reproductive Ecology and Biology Group, Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) (Received 9 May 2006; initial acceptance 16 June 2006; final acceptance 12 December 2006; published online 31 December 2007; MS. number: 8954) Two hypotheses could explain the evolution of paternal care: caring males are more attractive to females and mate more often (sexual selection); males care when the benefits in terms of offspring survival exceed the costs (natural selection). To test these hypotheses we used Phyllomorpha laciniata: females can choose whether to lay eggs on plants or on conspecifics, and the extent to which males carry eggs varies between populations. Our results do not support the sexual selection hypothesis: females did not choose to mate with egg-carrying males in either natural populations or experimental contexts. We compared two popu- lations that differ in the extent of male egg carrying and we show that in the population where male egg carrying was more prevalent, parasitism pressure was higher. Field experiments revealed that, in the pop- ulation with high parasitism rate, egg mortality as a result of parasitoid attack was up to 10 times higher on plants than on conspecifics. Egg carrying is thus an effective strategy that protects eggs against parasitoids. We conclude that the main benefit derived by males from egg carrying is an increase in offspring survival, and that males are sensitive to interpopulation differences in egg mortality risks.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPERFAMILY COREOIDEA: HEM PTERA in Ndla
    ISS 0375- 5 Rec. zool, Sura. India: 113(Part-4): 103-128,2013 T I BIOG -OG · AP CA D ST · BUT ON OF SP -CI SO THE SUPERFAMILY COREOIDEA: HEM_PTERA IN _NDlA D. PRABAK_AR Zoological Survey ofIndia, Southern R~gional Centre . 30, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028 E-mail : dprabaka.r14@gmailcom INTRODUCT ON with spines and tubercles. Antennae 4 segmented; Coreoidea is a large Superfamily of ocelli 2i beak 4 segmented; fr{)nt wing with many veins; t~si 3 segmented; scent glands present on predomin~ntly herbivorus insects that belong in the Hemipteran Suborder Heteropter,a. The the thorax; head narrower than and often shorter Superfamily Coreoidea is divided into 4 famjlies than the pronotum; hind tibia ,of some species namely Coreiddae, Stenocephalidae, Alydidae.. expanded and resembling leaves. The species in Rhopalidae but the Coreoidea as a whole are part the family Coreidae are separated from those in of a close-knit group with the Lygaeoidea ~d Alydidae by differences in width and length of Pyrrhocoroidea and it is likely that these three their heads relative to the pro I otum. ' The~e aIe super families are paraphyletic to a significant mor,e than 1800 species have been ' ecorded unde extent. They are therefore in need of revision and this family in the woOrld. red limitation. There ar-e more than 3400 species The family Stenocephalidae is represented by recorded in the world. only one (Dicranocephalus) genera. They are , e', ectsofthefamilyCore'daevaryfr,om7 commonly ,called as spurge bugs. These af'e phytophagus insects. They feed on Euphorbia to 45 nun, making the larger species some of ~he species.
    [Show full text]