DOCSLIB.ORG

The Right the Apostolic Succession of Right Rev. Gregory Wayne Godsey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Right the Apostolic Succession of Right Rev. Gregory Wayne Godsey The Apostolic Succession Of The Right Rev. Gregory Wayne Godsey © 2004-2013, The Diocese of the Southeast International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................3 Photographic Evidence .................................................................................................................................5 Lines of Apostolic Succession........................................................................................................................6 Reformed Episcopal – Anglican Succession ..............................................................................................6 Anglican, Celtic, Hebraic Succession [Line 1]..........................................................................................12 Anglican, Celtic, Hebraic Succession [Line 2]..........................................................................................17 Anglican, Roman, Johnanite Succession .................................................................................................22 Russian-Orthodox Succession [Line 1]....................................................................................................27 Russian-Orthodox Succession [Line 2]....................................................................................................32 Armenian Succession ..............................................................................................................................37 Assyrian – Selucian Succession ...............................................................................................................42 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................46 Succession from Constantinople and Albania.........................................................................................49 Old Catholic thru Utrecht........................................................................................................................58 Old Catholic Succession ..........................................................................................................................66 The Chaldean Catholic Uniate.................................................................................................................79 Order for Corporate Reunion [Line 1].....................................................................................................83 Order of Corporate Reunion [Line 2]......................................................................................................91 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession [Line 1] ............................................................99 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession [Line 2] ..........................................................106 Old Episcopal Linage .............................................................................................................................115 Marivite Succession ..............................................................................................................................123 Ukrainian Orthodox in the United States Succession ...........................................................................131 Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada Succession...............................................................................137 Greek – Melkhite Catholic Succession (Uniate)....................................................................................142 Polish Old Catholic Church Succession .................................................................................................143 Succession from Cyprus ........................................................................................................................144 2 Certificates 3 4 Photographic Evidence Ordination to the Priesthood (Subconditional) – March 30, 2004 Consecration to the Episcopacy (Subconditional) – March 30, 2004 Bishop Mark (Pultorak) Morrison, Bishop David (Jeremiah) Worley and Bishop Gregory Godsey March 30, 2004 5 Lines of Apostolic Succession Reformed Episcopal – Anglican Succession 1. Saint Peter, the Apostle of our Lord. – 32 – 67 2. Saint Linus – 67 – 76 3. Saint Anacletus (Cletus) – 76 – 88 4. Saint Clement I – 88 – 97 5. Saint Evaristus – 97 – 105 6. Saint Alexander I – 105 – 115 7. Saint Sixtus I (Xystus I) – 115 – 125 8. Saint Telesphorus – 125 – 136 9. Saint Hyginus – 136 – 140 10. Saint Pius I – 140 – 155 11. Saint Anicetus – 155 – 166 12. Saint Soter – 166 – 175 13. Saint Eleutherius – 175 – 189 14. Saint Victor I – 189 – 199 15. Saint Zephyrinus – 199 – 217 16. Saint Callistus I – 217 – 222 17. Saint Urban I – 222 – 230 18. Saint Pontain – 230 – 235 19. Saint Anterus – 235 – 236 20. Saint Fabian – 236 – 250 21. Saint Cornelius – 251 – 253 22. Saint Lucius I – 253 – 254 23. Saint Stephen I – 254 – 257 24. Saint Sixtus II – 257 – 258 25. Saint Dionysius – 260 – 268 26. Saint Felix I – 269 – 274 27. Saint Eutychian – 275 – 283 28. Saint Caius (Gaius) – 283 – 296 29. Saint Marcellinus – 296 – 304 30. Saint Marcellus I – 308 – 309 6 31. Saint Eusebius – 309 – 310 32. Saint Miltiades – 311 – 314 33. Saint Sylvester I – 314 – 335 34. Saint Marcus – 336 – 336 35. Saint Julius I – 337 – 352 36. Liberius – 352 – 366 37. Saint Damasus I – 366 – 383 38. Saint Siricius – 384 – 399 39. Saint Anastasius I – 399 – 401 40. Saint Innocent I – 401 – 417 41. Saint Zosimus – 417 – 418 42. Saint Boniface I – 418 – 422 43. Saint Celestine I – 422 – 432 44. Saint Sixtus III – 432 – 440 45. Saint Leo I (the Great) – 440 – 461 46. Saint Hilarius – 461 – 468 47. Saint Simplicius – 468 – 483 48. Saint Felix III (II) – 483 – 492 49. Saint Gelasius I – 492 – 496 50. Anastasius II – 496 – 498 51. Saint Symmachus – 498 – 514 52. Saint Hormisdas – 514 – 523 53. Saint John I – 523 – 526 54. Saint Felix IV (III) – 526 – 530 55. Boniface II – 530 – 532 56. JohnII –533– 535 57. Saint Agapetus I (Agapitus I) – 535 – 536 58. Saint Silverius – 536 – 537 59. Vigilius – 537 – 555 60. Pelagius I – 556 – 561 61. John III – 561 – 574 62. Benedict I – 575 – 579 7 63. Pelagius II – 579 – 590 64. Saint Gregory I (the Great) – 590 – 604 65. Saint Virgilius, Archbishop of Arles 588 – 610 66. Saint AUGUSTINE 597 67. LAURENTIUS 604 68. MELLITUS 619 69. JUSTUS 624 70. HONORIUS 627 71. DEUSDEDIT 655 72. THEODORE 668 73. BERHTWALD 693 74. TATWINE 731 75. NOTHELM 735 76. CUTHBERT 740 77. BREGOWINE 761 78. JAENBERT 765 79. ETHELHAR 793 80. WULFRED 805 81. FEOLOGELD 832 82. CEOLNOTH 833 83. ETHELRED 870 84. Wereferth 873 85. ALTHELM as Bishop of Wells (914 Canterbury) who in 914 consecrated 86. WULFHELM as Bishop of Wells (923 Canterbury) who in 927 consecrated 87. ODO as Bishop of Ramsbury (942 Canterbury) who in 957 consecrated 88. Saint DUNSTAN as Bishop of Worcester (960 Canterbury) who in 984 consecrated 89. Saint AELPHEGE as Bishop of Winchester (1005 Canterbury) who in 990 consecrated 90. ELFRIC as Bishop of Ramsbury (995 Canterbury) who in 1003 consecrated 91. WULFSTAN as Bishop of Worcester & York who, 13 November 1020, consecrated 92. ETHELNOTH as Archbishop of Canterbury who in 1035 consecrated 93. EADSIGE as Bishop of Saint Martin’s, Canterbury (Archbishop of Canterbury 1038) who on the 3rd April 1043 consecrated 8 94. STIGAND as Bishop of Elmham (1052 Canterbury) who in 1058 consecrated 95. SIWARD as Bishop of Rochester who on the 29th September 1070 assisted William, Bishop of London at the consecration of 96. Bl. LANFRANC as Archbishop of Canterbury, who in 1070 consecrated 97. THOMAS as Archbishop of York, who on the 4th December 1094 consecrated 98. Saint ANSELM as Archbishop of Canterbury, who on the 26th July 1108 consecrated 99. RICHARD DE BELMEIS as Bishop of London, who on the 18th February 1123 consecrated 100. WILLIAM OF CORBEUIL as Archbishop of Canterbury, who on the 17th November 1129 consecrated 101. HENRY OF BLOIS as Bishop of Winchester, who on the 3rd June 1162 consecrated 102. Saint THOMAS BECKET as Archbishop of Canterbury, who on the 23rd August 1164 consecrated 103. ROGER OF GLOUCESTER as Bishop of Worcester, who on the 7th November 1176 assisted Gilbert Foliot, Bishop of London, at the consecration of 104. PETER DE LEIA as Bishop of Saint David’s, who on the 29th September 1185 assisted Baldwin, Archbishop of Canterbury, at the consecration of 105. GILBERT GLANVILLE as Bishop of Rochester, who on the 23rd May 1199 assisted Hubert Walter, Archbishop of Canterbury, at the consecration of 106. WILLIAM OF S. MERE L’EGLISE who on the 5th October 1214 assisted Stephen Langton, Archbishop of Canterbury, at the consecration of 107. WALTER DE GRAY as Bishop of Worcester (1216 Archbishop of York), who on the 5th December 1249 consecrated 108. WALTER KIRKHAM as Bishop of Durham, who on the 7th February 1255 consecrated 109. HENRY as Bishop of Whithern, who on the 9th January 1284 assisted William Wickwane, Archbishop of York, at the consecration of 110. ANTHONY BECK as Bishop of Durham (1306 Patriarch of Jerusalem) who on the 14th September 1292 consecrated 111. JOHN OF HALTON as Bishop of Carlisle, who on the 27th June 1322 assisted Thomas Cobham, Bishop of Worcester, at the consecration of 112. ROGER NORTHBOROUGH as Bishop of Lichfield, who on the 15th July 1330 assisted Henry Burghersh, Bishop of Lincoln, at the consecration of 113. ROBERT WYVIL as Bishop of Salisbury,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George
    The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. James Michael St. George © Copyright 2014-2015, The International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. 1 Table of Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................4 ......................................................................................................................................................................5 Photos ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Lines of Succession........................................................................................................................................7 Succession from the Chaldean Catholic Church .......................................................................................7 Succession from the Syrian-Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch..............................................................10 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................16 Succession from the Russian Orthodox Church......................................................................................20 Succession from the Melkite-Greek Patriarchate of Antioch and all East..............................................27 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession .........................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries
    THE ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY And yet — in fact you need only draw a single thread at any point you choose out of the fabric of life and the run will make a pathway across the whole, and down that wider pathway each of the other threads will become successively visible, one by one. — Heimito von Doderer, DIE DÂIMONEN “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Archbishops of Canterb HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 597 CE Christianity was established among the Anglo-Saxons in Kent by Augustine (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), who in this year became the 1st Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the things this meant was that fruit orchards would be established for the monasteries. Despite repeated Viking attacks many of these survived. The monastery at Ely (Cambridgeshire) would be particularly famous for its orchards and vineyards. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. Archbishops of Canterbury “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 604 CE May 26, 604: Augustine died (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), and Laurentius succeeded him as Archbishop of Canterbury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clergy in the Medieval World: Secular Clerics, Their Families and Careers in North-Western Europe C.800–C.1200 Julia Barrow Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-08638-8 - The Clergy in the Medieval World: Secular Clerics, Their Families and Careers in North-Western Europe c.800–c.1200 Julia Barrow Index More information Index Aachen Adela, countess of Blois, 247, 258 collegiate church of Saint Mary (imperial Adelard, monk of Saint Peter’s, Ghent, 141 chapel), 121, 238, 274, 302 Adelard, scholasticus of Holy Cross, councils of, 38 Waltham, 89, 277 Councils of (816–17), 165 Admonitio Generalis,79 Rule of. See Institutio canonicorum adolescence, 28, 58, 61, 63–4 abacus, 221 adolescentia, 41, 53, 63 Abbo, bishop of Soissons, 58 adolescents, 44, 54, 121, 144, 161, 166, Abelard, Peter, 1, 14, 65, 116, 122, 126, 184, 236 147, 154, 171, 194, 201, 215–16, Adolf, bishop of Osnabrück, 154 222, 281 Adrian IV, pope, 137, 204, 339 Historia Calamitatum of, 14, 171 adulthood, 5, 27–8, 40, 66, 118–19, 200, Abergavenny, Master Peter of, canon of 347 Hereford, 199 adults, 9, 39–40, 70, 118–19, 198, 236, absenteeism, 12, 111, 271, 292, 309, 348 344 abstinence, sexual, 29–30 advocates, 152 acolytes, 35–9, 41–2, 44–5, 47–8, 67, advowson, 18, 22, 298, 327 69, 346 Ælberht, archbishop of York, 54, 166 Acts of the Apostles, 37, 78–9, 98, 100 Ælfheah, bishop of Winchester, 58, 60, 141 Adalbero, archbishop of Rheims, 91, 124, Ælfheah, brother of Ælfhere, 140 128 Ælfheah, priest of Plympton, 143 Adalbero I, bishop of Metz, 91, 124 Ælfhere, ealdorman of Mercia, 140 Adalbero II, bishop of Metz, 124 Ælfric, abbot of Eynsham, 87, 224–5, 342 Adalbero, bishop of Verdun, 124 Ælfric Bata, 218
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Contacts with the Papacy Before the Edwardian Conquest, C. 1283
    WELSH CONTACTS WITH THE PAPACY BEFORE THE EDWARDIAN CONQUEST, C. 1283 Bryn Jones A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2019 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/18284 This item is protected by original copyright Welsh contacts with the Papacy before the Edwardian Conquest, c. 1283 Bryn Jones This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at the University of St Andrews June 2019 Candidate's declaration I, Bryn Jones, do hereby certify that this thesis, submitted for the degree of PhD, which is approximately 80,000 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for any degree. I was admitted as a research student at the University of St Andrews in September 2009. I received funding from an organisation or institution and have acknowledged the funder(s) in the full text of my thesis. Date Signature of candidate Supervisor's declaration I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of PhD in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Six Stephen Langton: Moulding the Model After 1170
    Chapter Six Stephen Langton: Moulding the Model After 1170 Thomas Becket became the model for every archbishop of Canterbury to follow in regards to relations with Rome and the English crown. Such was his effect on the archiepiscopate that many of his successors supported and attempted to bolster his sanctity, and constant allusions were made to his name and figure as a revered saint. Stephen Langton was one such successor to Becket’s see and has been considered by Frederick Maurice Powicke as ‘one of the best, and also one of the least known figures in English history’. 1 Langton had a long and varied career, he was a student and leading scholar at Paris, he became a cardinal and archbishop of Canterbury, 2 and perhaps most importantly the arrangement and division of the Bible as it appears today is credited to him, 3 yet this is sometimes ignored. What Stephen Langton is known for, however, is the Interdict of England in 1208 and the creation of Magna Carta in 1215. Yet Langton is the feature of no contemporary biographies or even hagiographies that have survived to this day, all that is left are the chronicles of Matthew Paris, Roger of Wendover and Gervase of Canterbury which contain letters and other information about him. Powicke’s biography is the only modern work which focusses entirely on Langton and his policies, since many historians have glossed over his life, often preferring to study King John or Pope Innocent III. Accordingly there is very little is known about this archbishop apart from a few of his own scholarly writings that have survived.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Canterbury Cathedral Titlearchives and Library News Magna Carta News
    Newsletter Canterbury Cathedral titleArchives and Library News Magna Carta News f the many anniversaries being commemorated this year, the most significant for the Cathedral is that of Magna Carta, sealed by King John 800 years ago, on 15th June 1215, at Runnymede. The story of O Magna Carta is complex. However, its basic legacy is clear. Magna Carta is a cornerstone of English democracy, establishing the principle that all, including the monarch, should be subject to the law. Its influence through the centuries has been great, not just in this country, but also overseas, particularly in the United States. For a good introduction to Magna Carta, do look at the website of the Magna Carta Project (www. magnacarta.cmp.uea.ac.uk). Canterbury is one of the five designated ‘Magna Carta Towns’ in England, alongside Runnymede, the City of London, St Albans and Bury St Edmunds. These towns or cities have a particularly close historical link with Magna Carta. In the case of Canterbury, the link is Stephen Langton, Archbishop from 1207 to 1228. Langton’s appointment as Archbishop of Canterbury by Pope Innocent III led to John’s dispute with Rome, the ‘Interdict’ which the Pope placed on England, and the King’s excommunication. Langton was closely involved in the negotiations between the King and the barons which resulted in Magna Carta. He died on 9th July 1228, and is buried in St Michael’s Chapel. A further very close link with Magna Carta was revealed at the beginning of this year: one of the four surviving copies of the 1215 Magna Carta was identified by Prof David Carpenter as ‘the Canterbury Magna Carta’.
    [Show full text]
  • This I Say Against the Rage of Archdeacons Against My Poor Fellow Citizens': Archdeacons' Authority and Identity in Twelfth-Century England
    Marritt, S. (2017) 'All this I say against the rage of archdeacons against my poor fellow citizens': archdeacons' authority and identity in twelfth-century England. History, 102(353), pp. 914-932. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Marritt, S. (2017) 'All this I say against the rage of archdeacons against my poor fellow citizens': archdeacons' authority and identity in twelfth-century England. History, 102(353), pp. 914-932, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-229X.12523 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/149425/ Deposited on: 23 October 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 ‘All this I say against the rage of archdeacons against my poor fellow citizens’: Archdeacons’ Authority and Identity in Twelfth-Century England1 The English archidiaconate is well suited to a focus on the political culture of the Anglo-Norman and Angevin period because its significance within it has been little explored and because it encapsulates a number of the difficulties historians face in understanding how authority was then constituted, expressed and represented. It has often been defined by contemporary criticism, such as this assuredly rhetorical statement by John of Salisbury, or through the charters, acta, of archdeacons themselves, which are dominated by only the administrative processes of the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Hubert Walter's Council of Westminster of 1200 and Its Use of Alexander III's 1179 Lateran Council
    This is a repository copy of Hubert Walter's Council of Westminster of 1200 and its use of Alexander III's 1179 Lateran Council. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/133578/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Summerlin, D.J. orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-9365 (2018) Hubert Walter's Council of Westminster of 1200 and its use of Alexander III's 1179 Lateran Council. In: Eichbauer, M.H. and Summerlin, D.J., (eds.) The Use of Canon Law in Ecclesiastical Administration, 1000-1234. Medieval Law and Its Practice, 26 . Brill , Turnhout , pp. 121-139. ISBN 978- 90-04-38724-9 https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004387249_008 © 2018 Brill. This is an author-produced version of a chapter subsequently published in Eichbauer, M. and Summerlin, D. (eds.), The Use of Canon Law in Ecclesiastical Administration, 1000–1234. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Ecclesia
    Hort's "Christian Ecclesia." 345 in the really clearer Apostolic ·phrase, be treated as a body made up of members with a diversity of functions; and that all things should be done decently and in order." One is tempted to refer to other points in this suggestive volume; but enough has been said to indicate its character and value, and to stimulate, I hope, in the minds of many an earnest purpose to study it. It is an irenic book. It is only upon the line of the great principles it contends for that Church union is possible. These principles must eventually prevail. A great advance towards the unification of Protes­ tant Christendom will have been made when all see, as Professor Hort saw," the futility of endeavouring to make the Apostolic history into a set of authoritative precedents, to be rigorously copied without regard to time and place, thus turning the Gospel into a second Levitical code. The Apostolic age is full of embodiments of purposes and prin­ ciples of the most instructive kind; but the responsibility of choosing the means was left forever to the Ecclesia itself, and to each Ecclesia, guided by ancient precedents on the one hand and adaptation to present and future needs on the other. The lesson-book of the Ecclesia, and of every Ecclesia, is not a law, but a history." J. P. SHERATON. --<1>~<1>--' THE ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY AND THEIR CONNECTIONS WITH SUSSEX. PART II. N 1070 Stigand was succeeded by LANFRANC, the Norman I Abbot of Bee, and it was during his primacy that Domesday Book was completed, wherein, inter alia, the landed posses­ sions of the See of Canterbury are scheduled.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Lambeth Awards Citation Compendium Mrs Jocelyn
    1 2020 Lambeth Awards Citation Compendium Mrs Jocelyn Armstrong – The Hubert Walter Award for Reconciliation and Interfaith Cooperation For her outstanding contribution to interfaith relations in New Zealand. Jocelyn Armstrong is recognised within the Anglican Church of Aotearoa New Zealand, ecumenically, across the inter-faith community and by the New Zealand government as making a pioneering contribution to interfaith dialogue and education in Aotearoa New Zealand. As a theologian, educationalist and activist, Jocelyn has been instrumental in the establishment of the Religious Diversity Trust, whose goal is to foster appreciation, understanding and deeper relationships among the religious, spiritual and secular communities in Aotearoa New Zealand, seeking to ensure that New Zealand is an inclusive and safe society, marked by understanding and respect. Jocelyn has been active in both religious diversity education and in advocating for research that ensures accurate information is available about New Zealand’s religious communities and the issues that affect them and society as a whole. She has consistently argued that when sound and accurate knowledge feeds into wide public discussion, then quality policy-making can be achieved for a society. A teacher by profession, Jocelyn has also written the textbook ‘Discovering Diversity’ for the New Zealand State School Social Studies curriculum. It has widely been acknowledged that, following the terrorist shootings at Mosques in Christchurch New Zealand on 15 March 2019, the work pioneered by Jocelyn and others has to be built on as a matter of urgency. Jocelyn Armstrong has provided outstanding leadership in the ecumenical and the interfaith movements at national, regional (Asia) and international levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Burial-Places of the Archbishops of Canterbury
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 20 1893 ( 276 ) BURIAL-PLACES OE THE ARCHBISHOPS OE CANTERBURY. BY CANON SCOTT ROBERTSON. ARCHBISHOP BENSON is the 93rd actual occupant o£ the Primatial See of Canterbury, but Eoger Walden, who was intruded into Archbishop Arundel's throne, for a few years, is not usually counted as one of the Primates ; so that we reckon only 91 predecessors of the present Primate as legitimate Archbishops. Another prelate (Reginald Fitzjoceline, Bishop of Bath) was elected to the Primacy, but he died before he could be enthroned. John de TJfford (Lord Chancellor) died before he could be consecrated. Of the 91 pre- decessors of Archbishop Benson, the ashes of 58 lie in Canterbury; but all of these lived and died before the accession of Queen Elizabeth. 7 were buried at Lambeth, in or beside the parish church there (viz., PARKER, BANCROFT, TENISON, HUTTON, SECKER, CORN- w AM/IS, and MOORE). 6 were interred at Croydon (viz., GKINDAL, WHITGIFT, SHELDON, WAKE, POTTER, and HERRING). 5 are buried at Addington (viz., MANNERS-SUTTOH, *Howi/EY, *SUMNER, LONCKDEY, and *TAIT). 3 mingled with the dust at Oxford. (1) CRANMER was burned there in 155f. (2) LATTD, after his execution in 164f, was buried at Barking All Hallows, but in 1663 his remains were carried to tbe Chapel of St. John's College, Oxford. (3) JUXON (who, when Bishop of London, attended Charles I. upon the scaffold) was also interred at Oxford, in the Chapel of St. John's College, in 1663. 1 lies in London at the Church of St. Lawrence, Jewry.
    [Show full text]