Program(PDF:152KB)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Program(PDF:152KB) Program First Day, Wednesday, September 25, 2019 9:30 – 9:35 Greeting Hiroyuki Kanno, Justice, Supreme Court 9:35 – 9:45 Explanation of the Mock Case Yasuhiko Kobayashi, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court 9:50 – 10:40 Mock Trial (Japan) Makiko Takabe, Chief Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Mihoko Manabe, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Masaru Yamakado, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Aya Takahashi, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Takafumi Kokubu, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Daisuke Kumagai, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Hiroki Kan, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Koichi Shinohara, Judicial Research Official, Intellectual Property High Court Makoto Hattori, Attorney at Law, Abe, Ikubo & Katayama Harumi Kojo, Attorney at law, Sakurazaka Law Offices 10:45 – 11:35 Mock Trial (Korea) Kyuhong LEE, Presiding Judge, Patent Court of Korea Sang-Wook HAN, Attorney at Law, Kim & Chang Hoodong LEE, Attorney at Law, Bae, Kim & Lee LLC 11:40 – 12:30 Mock Trial (China) Lang Guimei, Senior Judge, Intellectual Property Division of the Supreme People’s Court of China Wang yuanyuan, Senior Judge, Shenzhen Intellectual Property Court of Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court Chixue WEI, Attorney at Law, Linda Liu & Partners Sai CHEN, Attorney at Law, Beijing Wei Chixue Law Firm Jia GUO, Patent Attorney, NGB CORPORATION Nancy (Xiaowen) SONG, Patent Attorney, Beijing Wei Chixue Law Firm Tao CHEN, Patent Attorney, Linda Liu & Partners 12:30 – 13:45 Break 13:45 – 14:35 Mock Trial (Australia) John Nicholas, Justice, Federal Court of Australia Sarah Matheson, Attorney at Law, Allens Philip Kerr, Attorney at Law, Allens 14:40 – 15:30 Mock Trial (India) Prathiba M. Singh, Justice, High Court of Delhi Pravin Anand, Attorney at Law, Anand & Anand Hemant Singh, Attorney at Law, Intellectual Property Law Firm INTTL ADVOCARE Saya Choudhary Kapur, Attorney at Law, Singh & Singh Rajiv Bhatnagar, Patent Attorney, Anand & Anand 15:30 – 15:50 Break 15:50 – 17:20 Panel Discussion ~Overview of Mock Trials ~ Moderators Sumiko Sekine, Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Harumi Kojo, Attorney at law, Sakurazaka Law Offices Panelists Japan Makiko Takabe, Chief Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Makoto Hattori, Attorney at Law, Abe, Ikubo & Katayama Australia John Nicholas, Justice, Federal Court of Australia China Wang yuanyuan, Senior Judge, Shenzhen Intellectual Property Court of Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court India Prathiba M. Singh, Justice, High Court of Delhi Korea Kyuhong LEE, Presiding Judge, Patent Court of Korea Attorneys at Law from each country 17:20 – 17:30 Closing Remarks Yutaro Kikuchi, President, Japan Federation of Bar Associations 17:30 End of the First Day Second Day, Thursday, September 26, 2019 9:40 – 9:45 Greeting Hiroyuki Tsuji, Vice-Minister of Justice 9:45 – 10:50 Mock Trial (Copyright Infringement on Internet) Japan Koichi Tanaka, Judge, Tokyo District Court Yuriko Sagara, Attorney at Law, Nakamura & Partners Yuta Ujike, Attorney at Law, Aoyama Law Offices Ayako Suga, Attorney at Law, Baker & McKenzie Kumiko Iwai, Attorney at Law, Anderson Mōri & Tomotsune Cambodia Key Manera, Judge, Vice President of Phnom Penh Court of First Instance Indonesia Unggul Prayudho Satriyo, Judge of the Court of first instance assigned as Judicial Assistant serving to the Supreme Court Judge Laos Acksonesinh Vixayalai, Judge, Head of Commercial Chamber (Division) Vientiane Capital People’s Court Malaysia Lim Chong Fong, Judge, Kuala Lumpur High Court (Intellectual Property Court) Myanmar Soe Khun Phyu, District Judge, Assistant Director at Union Supreme Court Philippines Arthur O. Malabaguio, Judge, Regional Trial Court Singapore Justin Yeo, District Judge, Deputy Divisional Registrar of the Court of Appeal Thailand Chaiyos Oranonsiri, Judge, Vice-President of the Court of Appeal for Specialized Cases Vietnam Chu Le Huong, Deputy Chief Judge, Lang Son Province People's Court 10:50 – 11:05 Break 11:05 – 12:15 Mock Trial - summarization 12:15 – 13:30 Break 13:30 – 14:00 Speech (Current Status of Clearance for Copyright Infringement) Isamu Hagiwara, Superintendent, Assistant Director, Economic Crime Investigations Division, National Police Agency 14:00 – 14:15 Break 14:15 – 14:35 Presentation (1) ~ Investigation Procedures for Copyright Infringement (Thailand) Chavalit Chavalitphongpun, Superintendent (Inquiry), Economic Crime Suppression Division, Royal Thai Police 14:35 – 14:55 Presentation (2) ~ Investigation Procedures for Copyright Infringement (Singapore) Winnie Leong, the Head of the Intellectual Property Rights Branch, Criminal Investigation Department, Singapore Police Force 14:55 – 15:10 Break 15:10 – 17:20 Panel Discussions ~ Investigation Procedures for Copyright Infringement on Internet ~ Moderators Yukari Kotani, Government Attorney, Professor, International Cooperation Department, Research and Training Institute of the Ministry of Justice Ryota Shitamichi, Government Attorney, Professor, International Cooperation Department, Research and Training Institute of the Ministry of Justice Commentator Isamu Hagiwara, Superintendent, Assistant Director, Economic Crime Investigations Division, National Police Agency Panelists Brunei Dato Paduka Hj Mohammad Hassan bin Pehin Penyurat Hj Awang Ahmad, Director of Criminal Investigations Department, Royal Brunei Police Force Cambodia Meas Ravuth, Deputy-Director, Anti-Economic Crime Police Department, Office of Anti-Intellectual Property Crime, under the General Commissariat of National Police, Ministry of Interior Indonesia Hendy Febrianto Kurniawan, Head of Unit Ⅳ Industrial Commerce Sub- Directorate, Special Crime Directorate, Crime Investigation Department of Indonesian National Police Laos Chanthone Heuangkhamxay, Deputy Director of INTERPOL Department, General Department of Police, Ministry of Public Security Malaysia Amran Md Jusin, Head of Cooperative Investigation Unit, Commercial Crime Investigation Department, Royal Malaysia Police Myanmar Soe Naing, Police Lieutenant colonel, Crime Investigation Department, Myanmar Police Force Philippines Nestor Elio Bacuyag, Police Captain/Lawyer, Philippine National Police Vietnam Pham Hai Binh, Lecturer of Police Academy of Vietnam, Ministry of Public security 17:20 End of the Second Day Third Day, Friday, September 27, 2019 9:30 – 9:40 Keynote Speech Akira Matsunaga, Commissioner, Japan Patent Office (JPO) 9:40 – 10:00 The Latest Situation of Trials and Appeals Takashi Yamashita, Director-General, Trial and Appeal Department, JPO 10:00 – 12:25 Panel Discussions (Comparison between countries on judgment of inventive step for patent) Moderators Shoichi Okuyama, Patent Attorney, Okuyama & Sasajima Shimako Kato, Patent Attorney, Abe, Ikubo & Katayama Panelists Japan Yoshiyuki Mori, Presiding Judge, Intellectual Property High Court Yuji Wada, Executive Chief Administrative Judge, JPO Australia John Nicholas, Justice, Federal Court of Australia China Lang Guimei, Senior Judge, Intellectual Property Division of the Supreme People’s Court of China Wang yuanyuan, Senior Judge, Shenzhen Intellectual Property Court of Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court India Prathiba M. Singh, Justice, Delhi High Court Republic of Korea Kyuhong LEE, Presiding Judge, Patent Court of Korea Singapore Justin Yeo, District Judge, Deputy Divisional Registrar of the Court of Appeal 12:25 – 12:30 Closing Remarks Makiko Takabe, Chief Judge, Intellectual Property High Court .
Recommended publications
  • Counter-Terrorism 1 Counter-Terrorism
    Counter-terrorism 1 Counter-terrorism WARNING: Article could not be rendered - ouputting plain text. Potential causes of the problem are: (a) a bug in the pdf-writer software (b) problematic Mediawiki markup (c) table is too wide United States Coast GuardCoast Guard on counter-terrorism patrol in Upper New York Bay. Verrazano-Narrows Bridge in distance spanning The Narrows between Brooklyn (left) and Staten Island (right).TerrorismDefinitions of terrorismDefinitionsHistory of terrorismHistoryList of terrorist incidentsIncidents Counter-terrorism (also spelled counterterrorism) incorporates the practices, Military tacticstactics, techniques, and strategies that governments, militarymilitaries, police departments and corporations adopt to attack terrorist threats and/or acts, both real and imputed.The tactic of terrorism is available to insurgencyinsurgents and governments. Not all insurgents use Fearterror as a tactic, and some choose not to use it because other tactics work better for them in a particular context. Individuals, such as Timothy McVeigh, may also engage in terrorist acts such as the Oklahoma City bombing. If the terrorism is part of a broader insurgency, counter-terrorism may also form a part of a counter-insurgency doctrine, but political, economic, and other measures may focus more on the insurgency than the specific acts of terror. Foreign internal defense (FID) is a term used for programs either to suppress insurgency, or reduce the conditions under which insurgency could develop. Counter-terrorism includes both the detection of potential acts and the response to related events. PlanningUnited States Customs and Border Protection officers, fully armed and armored for a counter-terrorism operationMost counter-terrorism strategies involve an increase in standard police and domestic intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Against Transnational Crime Through Regional Organized Law Enforcement” (“PATROL”) Project, Led by UNODC
    Partnership against Transnational Crime through Regional Organized Law Enforcement (PATROL) Project Number: XAP/U59 Baseline survey and training needs assessment in Myanmar © United Nations Environment Programme 17-21 October 2011 DISCLAIMER: The results from the survey reflect the perception of participants, and they are not the results of specific investigations by UNODC or PATROL partners - Freeland Foundation, TRAFFIC and UNEP. Any error in the interpretation of these results cannot be directly attributed to an official position of any of the organizations involved. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Background and Context – The PATROL Project...................................................... 4 1.2. Objective of the Baseline Survey and TNA................................................................ 4 2. Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Basic Statistics of the Sample ..................................................................................... 5 2.2. Limitations of the Methodology.................................................................................. 6 3. Major Findings ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Survey Findings..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rendőrségi Tanulmányok
    RENDŐRSÉGI TANULMÁNYOK A REND ŐRSÉG TUDOMÁNYOS TANÁCSÁNAK FOLYÓIRATA RITECZ GYÖRGY A terrorizmus hatása a turizmusra NÉMETH GYULA A közúti szállítás biztonságát veszélyeztet ő kihívások az Európát ért terrortámadások tükrében KONCSAG KATALIN Egy kihallgató szemszögéb ől – Hozzátartozók közötti vallomás- megtagadási jog az új Be. tükrében SALLAI JÁNOS In memoriam Dr. Déri Pál nyugállományú rend őr dandártábornok I. évfolyam 2018/4. SZERKESZTI A SZERKESZT ŐBIZOTTSÁG ELNÖK: Dr. Pozsgai Zsolt rend őr vezér őrnagy TAGOK: Dr. habil. Boda József nyugállományú nemzetbiztonsági vezér őrnagy Dr. Boros Gábor rend őr ezredes Dávid Károly rend őr dandártábornok Dr. univ. Dsupin Ottó rend őr dandártábornok Dr. Gárdonyi Gergely PhD rend őr ezredes Dr. habil. Hautzinger Zoltán Dr. Janza Frigyes nyugállományú rend őr vezér őrnagy Prof. Dr. Kerezsi Klára MTA doktora Dr. habil. Kovács Gábor rend őr dandártábornok Dr. Németh József PhD rend őr ezredes Prof. Dr. Sallai János rend őr ezredes Dr. Sipos Gyula rend őr vezér őrnagy FELEL ŐS SZERKESZT Ő: Dr. Gaál Gyula PhD rend őr ezredes MŰSZAKI SZERKESZT Ő: Steib Norbert FELEL ŐS KIADÓ: Dr. Németh József PhD rend őr ezredes, Rend őrség Tudományos Tanácsa elnök KIADÓ Rend őrség Tudományos Tanácsa Cím: 1139 Budapest, Teve u. 4-6. 1903 Bp. Pf.: 314/15. Telefon: +36 1 443-5533, BM: 33-355 Fax: +36 1 443-5784, BM: 33-884 E-mail: [email protected] Webcím: www.bm-tt.hu/rtt/index.html HU ISSN 2630-8002 (online) KÖZLÉSI FELTÉTELEK A szerkeszt őség olyan kéziratokat vár közlésre, amelyek a b űnmegel őzés, a b űnüldözés, a közbiztonság, a közrend, a határrendészet, a vezetés-irányítás és a mindenoldalú biztosítás kérdéseit elemzik, értékelik.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Royal Malaysia Police
    HUMAN RIGHTS “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia WATCH “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia Copyright © 2014 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-1173 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2014 ISBN: 978-1-62313-1173 “No Answers, No Apology” Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia Glossary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Map of Malaysia .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies
    Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies Editors Aditya Batara G Beni Sukadis Contributors Pierre Aepli Colonel Rudito A.A. Banyu Perwita, PhD Zoltán Nagy Lieutenant-Colonel János Hegedűs First Edition, June 2007 Layout Front Cover Lebanese-Israeli Borders Downloaded from: www.michaelcotten.com Printed by Copyright DCAF & LESPERSSI, 2007 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces FOREWORD Suripto, SH Vice Chairman of 3rd Commission, Indonesian House of Representatives And Chariman of Lesperssi Founder Board Border issues have been one of the largest areas of concern for Indonesia. Since becoming a sovereign state 61 years ago, Indonesia is still facing a series of territorial border problems. Up until today, Indonesia has reached agreements with its neighbouring countries related to demarcation and state border delineation. However, the lack of an unequivocal authority for border management has left serious implications for the state’s sovereignty and its citizen’s security. The Indonesian border of today, is still having to deal with border crime, which includes the violation of the territorial border, smuggling and terrorist infiltration, illegal fishing, illegal logging and Human Rights violations. These kinds of violations have also made a serious impact on the state’s sovereignty and citizen’s security. As of today, Indonesia still has an ‘un-settled’ sea territory, with regard to the rights of sovereignty (Additional Zone, Economic Exclusive Zone, and continent plate). This frequently provokes conflict between the authorised sea-territory officer on patrol and foreign ships or fishermen from neighbouring countries. One of the principal border problems is the Sipadan-Ligitan dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia, which started in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lanzarote Committee: Protecting Children from Sexual 24 Violence in Europe and Beyond
    Copyright © 2020 by University of Pécs - Centre for European Research and Education All rights reserved. This journal or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the publisher ex- cept for the use of brief quotations in a journal review. www.ceere.eu/pjiel Table of Contents EDITORIAL: In this issue; I came in here for an argument! The German Federal Cons- 5 titutional Court’s ruling on the PSPP programme and the authority of EU law PETRA PERISIC: Attribution of Conduct in UN Peacekeeping Operations 9 ZSUZSANNA RUTAI: The Lanzarote Committee: protecting children from sexual 24 violence in Europe and beyond PÉTER BUDAI: A new theoretical framework of the law of intergovernmental 43 organizations and its applicability to the European Union PHET SENGPUNYA: Online Dispute Resolution Scheme for E-Commerce: 58 The ASEAN Perspectives ISTVÁN SZIJÁRTÓ: Behind the Efficiency of Joint Investigation Teams 75 ÁGOSTON MOHAY: The Dorobantu case and the applicability of the ECHR in the 85 EU legal order SANDRA FABIJANIĆ GAGRO: The Concept of ‘Junction Area’ – Sui Generis Solution 91 to Reconciling the Integrity of Territorial Sea and ‘Freedoms of Communication’? ISTVÁN TARRÓSY: Helmut Kury and Slawomir Redo (eds.): Refugees and Migrants 103 in Law and Policy. Challenges and Opportunities for Global Civic Education. BENCE KIS KELEMEN: Harold Hongju Koh: The Trump Administration and 108 International law Pécs Journal of International and European Law - 2020/I. Editorial In this issue The editors are pleased to present issue 2020/I of the Pécs Journal of International and European Law, published by the Centre for European Research and Education of the Faculty of Law of the University of Pécs.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Rome Statute
    ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 1/146 RH PT Cour Penale (/\Tl\) _ni _t_e__r an _t_oi _n_a_l_e �i��------------------ ----- International �� �d? Crimi nal Court Original: English No.: ICC-01/19 Date: 4 July 2019 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER III Before: Judge Olga Herrera Carbuccia, Presiding Judge Judge Robert Fremr Judge Geoffrey Henderson SITUATION IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH / REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR PUBLIC With Confidential EX PARTE Annexes 1, 5, 7 and 8, and Public Annexes 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10 Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15 Source: Office of the Prosecutor ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 2/146 RH PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Ms Fatou Bensouda Mr James Stewart Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence States’ Representatives Amicus Curiae REGISTRY Registrar Counsel Support Section Mr Peter Lewis Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section Victims Participation and Reparations Other Section Mr Philipp Ambach No. ICC-01/19 2/146 4 July 2019 ICC-01/19-7 04-07-2019 3/146 RH PT CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 II. LEVEL OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND REQUESTED PROCEDURE .................... 8 III. PROCEDURAL
    [Show full text]
  • Eradicating Corruption: the Roles and Initiatives of Royal Malaysia Police
    Eradicating Corruption: The Roles and Initiatives of Royal Malaysia Police o Developing public trust by providing accurate responses to any queries; o Gathering information and feedback directly from the public; o Free of charge; o Forming support group; o Reaching out to bloggers who have very high influence on the society especially the cyber Mr. Azha community; o A platform for voicing out opinion and ideas regarding issues relating to the commission; o Speed of information flow; and In the era of globalization, the scope of policing has widened and Royal Malaysia o Personal, engaging and involving. Police (RMP) needs a paradigm shift to meet the present and future challenges. While VI. CONCLUSION RMP is approaching 204 years old this year, this institution needs to reinvent and rebrand The responsibility of combating corruption in this era of technology has become more to stay continuously relevant. Currently (until 30th September 2011) the population of the challenging and complex. The advancement of technology creates a huge platform for fast and accurate responses. It sometimes provides a huge opportunity for certain groups of people RMP stands at 110,594 police personnel, with eight departments namely Management with evil intensions to disseminate lies and hatred information in order to weaken the image of enforcement agency such as the MACC. By weakening the credibility and reputation of so Department, Criminal Investigation Department, Commercial Crime Investigation called “sensitive and important” agency, it will also reflect the negative image and credibility of the government. In order to win a war on corruption, the commission must also take into Department, Narcotics Crime Investigation Department, Internal Security and Public consideration the war against perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report: Towards a Global Indicator on Unidentified Victims in Child Sexual Exploitation Material
    00110010011101010001110010101010101000101001010100001010101010101010101000101101010101010110001011001010 11001101101000110011000101010101001001010110010101000101010100101010101010101010001010001100100111010101 01010101000101010100100101010101010101001010010101000010101111100010101011100010101010010101010101010000 10100101001000010010101010101000010101001010100101001010101110010111000111001110111001110011100011100011 10001001010100101001010111001100100111010100011100101010101010001010010101000010101010101010101010001011 01010101010110001011001010110011011010001100110001010101010010010101100101010001010101001010101010101010 10001010001100100111010101010101010001010101001001010101010101010010100101010000101011111000101010111000 10101010010101010101010000101001010010000100101010101010000101010010101001010010101011100101110001110011 10111001110011100011100011100010010101001010010101110011001001110101000111001010101010100010100101010000 10101010101010101010001011010101010101100010110010101100110110100011001100010101010100100101011001010100 01010101001010101010101010100010100011001001110101010101010100010101010010010101010101010100101001010100 00101011111000101010111000101010100101010101010100001010010100100001001010101010100001010100101010010100 10101011100101110001110011101110011100111000111000111000100101010010100101011100110010011101010001110010 10101010100010100101010000101010101010101010100010110101010101011000101100101011001101101000110011000101 01010100100101011001010100010101010010101010101010101000101000110010011101010101010101000101010100100101
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign and Security Policy in the New Malaysia
    Foreign and security policy in Elina Noor the New Malaysia November 2019 FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY IN THE NEW MALAYSIA The Lowy Institute is an independent policy think tank. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia — economic, political and strategic — and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high-quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. Lowy Institute Analyses are short papers analysing recent international trends and events and their policy implications. The views expressed in this paper are entirely the author’s own and not those of the Lowy Institute or the institutions with which the author is affiliated. FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY IN THE NEW MALAYSIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Malaysia’s historic changE oF govErnment in May 2018 rEturnEd Former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad to ofFice supported by an eclectic coalition of parties and interests under the Pakatan Harapan (AlliancE of HopE) bannEr. This raisEd quEstions about how thE sElF-declared Malaysia Baharu (NEw Malaysia) would EngagE with thE rest of thE world. AftEr thE ElEction, it was gEnErally assumEd that Malaysia’s ForEign policy would largEly stay thE coursE, with some minor adjustments. This trajEctory was confirmEd with thE SEptembEr 2019 relEasE of thE Foreign Policy Framework of the New Malaysia: Change in Continuity, thE country’s First major Foreign policy restatement under the new government.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Trust in the Myanmar Police Force: Exploring the Influencing Factors
    Public Trust in the Myanmar Police Force: Exploring the Influencing Factors Thura Aung and Win Win May Edited by Radka Antalíková, PhD 2 · Abstract / Acknowledgements Abstract While a number of studies have investigated the factors theoretical framework, the present study examined influencing public trust in the police in developed whether Bamar and non-Bamar from both urban and countries, similar research is still quite rare in developing rural areas expressed different levels of trust in the countries. This study is the first to explore this particular police. Findings revealed that people from urban areas topic in Myanmar, a developing country. Specifically, had a lower level of trust in the police than people from this study measured the level of public trust in the rural areas, while no difference was found between police and investigated factors that influence public the Bamar and non-Bamar populations. In addition, trust in the police by collecting survey data in both Myanmar people’s attitudes towards the police as a urban and rural areas of Yangon Region, Myanmar whole were substantially influenced by their perception (N = 401). Using conflict theory as the guiding of police accessibility. Acknowledgement This research report was primarily supported by the their focal persons and participants for collecting Peace Leadership and Research Institute of Thabyay as well as filling out the questionnaires analyzed in Education Foundation. The authors would like to this report. The authors have received very helpful thank Sayar Saw Myo Min Thu and Sayarma Zin comments on the manuscript from James MacMillan, Mar Oo for their encouragement and support of instructor, and Radka Antalíková, research instructor, this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Staff of Unafei
    MAIN STAFF OF UNAFEI Faculty: Mr. SETO Takeshi Director Ms. ISHIHARA Kayo Deputy Director Mr. FUTAGOISHI Ryo Professor Ms. KITAGAWA Mika Professor Mr. OTANI Junichiro Professor Mr. YAMADA Masahiro Professor Mr. HIRANO Nozomu Professor Mr. OHINATA Hidenori Professor Mr. WATANABE Hiroyuki Professor Chief of Information and Public Relations Dr. YAMAMOTO Mana Professor Chief of Research Division Mr. FURUHASHI Takuya Professor Mr. Thomas L. SCHMID Linguistic Adviser Secretariat: Mr. FUJITA Takeshi Chief of Secretariat Mr. TOYODA Yasushi Chief of Training and Hostel Management Affairs Section Ms. KIKUCHI Yoshimi Chief of General and Financial Affairs Section AS OF 31 DECEMBER 2018 19 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2018 2018 VISITING EXPERTS THE 168TH INTERNATIONAL SENIOR SEMINAR Dr. Roy Godson Professor Emeritus Georgetown University United States Dr. Matti Joutsen Special Advisor Thailand Institute of Justice Finland Dr. Kittipong Kittayarak Executive Director Thailand Institute of Justice Thailand Mr. Severino H. Gaña, Jr. Senior Deputy State Prosecutor Department of Justice Philippines Ms. Lula Asaad Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) FIFTH UNAFEI CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING PROGRAMME FOR FRENCH- SPEAKING AFRICAN COUNTRIES Ms. Céline VERDIER Vice-prèsidente chargée de l'instruction Tribunal de Grande Instance de Brest France Mr. Julien Savoye Program Officer in the Terrorism Prevention Team UNODC Regional Office for West and Central Africa Immeuble Abbary France Mr. Soufiane El Hamdi The International Institute for Justice and the Rule of Law (IIJ) Morocco THE 169TH INTERNATIONAL TRAINING COURSE Mr. Wasawat Chawalitthamrong Head of Cybercrime Sector One Bureau of Technology and Cyber Crime Department of Special Investigation Ministry of Justice Thailand Mr.
    [Show full text]