Levosimendan, Vasopressin, Terlipressin Theory Vs Reality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Levosimendan, Vasopressin, Terlipressin Theory Vs Reality Levosimendan, Vasopressin, Terlipressin Theory vs Reality Lynn Choo BPharm (Hons), MScPharmPrac, MSHP, MRPharmS Specialist Pharmacist (Intensive Care) John Hunter Hospital, Australia Allied Health Symposium: Critical Care Pharmacy 1 Shock Shock Failure to deliver and / or utilise oxygen adequately Give oxygen Clinical signs, lactate +/- Hypotension Vincent JL and De Backer D. NEJM 2013; 369:1726-34 Antonelli M et al. ICM 2007; 33: 575-90 Types of shock Distributive Cardiogenic Hypovolaemic Obstructive Septic Myocardial infarction Haemorrhage Massive PE Anaphylactic Arrhythmia Severe dehydration Cardiac tamponade Neurogenic Heart failure Fluid redistribution Tension pneumothorax Cardiomyopathy Valvular disease Myocarditis Vasodilation Poor cardiac output Plasma or blood loss Blockage in blood flow ‘Periphery’ issue Pump issue Volume issue 2 Vasoactive agents Terminology “Inotrope” Vasopressor Inodilator Drug class Endogenous: dopamine, noradrenaline, adrenaline Catecholamines Synthetic: dobutamine, isoprenaline, phenylephrine Sympathomimetic Metaraminol Other hormones Endogenous: vasopressin Synthetic: terlipressin PDE Inhibitor Milrinone Calcium sensitiser Levosimendan The French Study (Annane 2007) Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock Lancet 2007; 370: 676-84 • RCT (19 ICUs in France) • n = 330 • no difference in 28 and 90 day mortality, LOS, time to haemodynamic stabilisation • adrenaline – transient metabolic side effects CAT Study (Myburgh 2008) A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 2226-34 • RCT (4 ICUs in Australia) • n = 280 • no difference in time to reach MAP goal, 28 and 90 day mortality • adrenaline – transient metabolic side effects SOAP II Trial (De Backer 2010) Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock NEJM 2010; 362: 779-89 • RCT (8 ICUs in Belgium, Austria, Spain) • n = 1679 • no difference in overall mortality (ICU, hospital, 6 and 12 month) • dopamine higher 28-day mortality in cardiogenic shock subgroup • dopamine more arrhythmias ANZICS Dopamine Trial (Bellomo 2000) Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction Lancet 2000; 356: 2139-43 • RCT (23 ICUs in Australia, NZ and Hong Kong) • n = 328 • dopamine 2 microg/kg/min vs placebo • “renal dose” dopamine DID NOT reduce peak creatinine, need for renal replacement therapy, LOS, mortality Noradrenaline, Adrenaline or Dobutamine? • Receptor affinity and effects • No evidence of superiority • Use based on interpretation of physiology, familiarity, personal or unit preference, cost, availability Dopamine?? More arrhythmias compared to noradrenaline More deaths compared to noradrenaline No ‘renal dose’ dopamine Review: Circulatory shock Vincent J and De Backer D. NEJM 2013; 369: 1726-34 John Myburgh: Catecholamines, Resuscitation and Resurrection: Fact or Fiction? SMACC 2013 Video https://vimeo.com/66601916 Inotropes, vasopressors and other vasoactive agents Life in the fast lane: Critical Care Compendium http://lifeinthefastlane.com/ccc/inotropes-vasopressors-and- other-vasoactive-agents/ Vasopressors in shock: too early to move away from catecholamines? De Backer D and Scolletta S. BJP 2012; 165: 2012-14 Review: Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients Bangash M et al. BJP 2012; 165: 2015-33 Inotrope and vasopressor therapy of septic shock Hollenberg S. Crit Care Clin 2009; 25: 781-802 3 Levosimendan The theory Interesting Novel mode of action pharmacokinetics Inodilator Calcium sensitiser Opens ATP-dependent K channels Increase CO and diastolic relaxation without increase in myocardial O2 demand Reduces after load Ok with beta-blockers ACTIVE levosimendan 98% protein bound (albumin) half-life 1 hour Extensively metabolised via 2 pathways 95% conjugated into 5% reduction by intestinal flora and acetylation inactive metabolites to ACTIVE metabolite OR-1896 excreted via urine & faeces Effect lasts up to 9 days after stopping 24 hr • Half-life 80 hours infusion • 50% renally excreted • 40% protein bound The reality… 203 Levosimendan LIDO Dobutamine Haemodynamics Low output 24 mcg/kg + 2002 5 – 10 mcg/kg/min [24 h] Mortality LVEF < 35% 0.1 - 0.2 mcg/kg/min [24 h] 199 Levosimendan Placebo or CASINO Mortality NYHA IV 16 mcg/kg + Dobutamine 2004 *unpublished LVEF ≤ 35% 0.2 mcg/kg/min [24 h] 10 mcg/kg/min [24 h] 600 Levosimendan Mortality trend REVIVE II ADHF 12 mcg/kg + Placebo Hypotension, AF 2006 LVEF ≤ 35% 0.2 mcg/kg/min [24 h] *unpublished 1327 Levosimendan SURVIVE Dobutamine No difference ADHF 12 mcg/kg + 2007 ≥ 5 mcg/kg/min [≥ 24 h] Hypotension LVEF < 30% 0.1 – 0.2 mcg/kg/min [24 h] Levosimendan RUSSLAN 504 6 – 24 mcg/kg + Placebo No difference 2002 LVF post MI 0.1 – 0.4 mcg/kg/min [6 h] 1 Availability 2 $$$ 3 Patient selection 4 Dosing regime 5 Hypotension and arrhythmias 6 Consensus and guideline 4 Vasopressin The theory a.k.a. arginine vasopressin or antidiuretic hormone Stimulates V1 receptors vasoconstriction Relative deficiency in septic shock Infusion as adjunct and physiological replacement Risk of cardiac, splanchnic, digital ischaemia at high doses The reality… VASST VACS VANISH VASST Russell J et al. NEJM 2008; 358: 877-87 Vasopressin in Septic Shock Trial • 780 patients (27 centres in Canada, Australia, US) • Noradrenaline (5 – 15 microg/min) +/- Vasopressin (0.01 – 0.03 unit/min) • No difference in mortality or serious adverse events • Vasopressin reduced catecholamine requirements • Positive interaction with hydrocortisone VACS Gordon A et al. Crit Care Med 2014; 43: 1325-33 Vasopressin and Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock • Pilot RCT, 61 patients (4 ICUs in London) • Vasopressin (up to 0.06 unit/min) as initial vasopressor +/- hydrocortisone • Open label catecholamine vasopressor if required • Hydrocortisone reduced vasopressin requirements and duration, did not alter vasopressin levels Gordon A et al. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e005866 Vasopressin vs Noradrenaline as Initial Therapy in Septic Shock • UK multi-center RCT, 412 patients recruited • Vasopressin (0 - 0.06 unit/min) vs Noradrenaline (0 - 12 microg/min) • +/- Hydrocortisone when max vasopressor dose reached • + additional open-label catecholamine if required • Primary outcome: difference in renal failure-free days • Secondary outcome: need for RRT, survival rates, other organ failures, resource utilisation 1 Availability 2 When to start? 3 Dose? 4 Concurrent hydrocortisone? Gordon A. Vasopressin in septic shock. JICS 2011; 12: 11 - 14 5 Terlipressin The theory Synthetic, long-acting vasopressin analogue Half-life 4 to 6 hours Relative specificity for splanchnic circulation Acute variceal bleed and hepato-renal syndrome Septic shock? Continuous terlipressin vs vasopressin in septic shock • randomised pilot, 45 patients, single centre TERLIVAP • T 1.3 microg/kg/h, V 0.03 unit/min or N 15 microg/min Morelli A et al. Critical Care 2009; 13: R130 • + open label noradrenaline • dobutamine to achieve SvO2 65% • hydrocortisone 200mg/d for all groups Terlipressin reduced noradrenaline requirements Limitations • Single centre, small number • Non-equivalent dosing? TERLIVAP • Only 48 hour intervention period Morelli A et al. Critical Care 2009; 13: R130 • Different to Australian and NZ practice • Dobutamine to achieve SvO2 >65% • Activated protein C • Mortality rates 50 – 66% Large RCTs required Continuous terlipressin infusion in septic shock • Estimated 1000 patients China Trial • Multicenter RCT ClinicalTrials.gov NCR01697410 • T 0.66 – 2.66 microg/min v N 7.5 – 30 microg/min • Primary outcome: 28 day mortality • Secondary outcomes • SAFA scores • Days alive and free of vasopressor • 90 day mortality The reality… Potential option where vasopressin unavailable Optimum dosing regimen still unclear Need large trials ? 6 Adrenaline AUD 50 per day NZD 50 per day 0.5 microg/kg/min for 70 kg Noradrenaline AUD 250 per day NZD 190 per day 0.5 microg/kg/min for 70 kg Dobutamine AUD 20 per day NZD 100 per day 10 microg/kg/min for 70 kg Milrinone AUD 225 per day NZD 270 per day 0.5 microg/kg/min for 70 kg Vasopressin AUD 180 per day NZD 150 per day 0.03 unit/min Levosimendan AUD 1250 per dose NZD 1450 per dose 12.5mg dose (1 vial) 7 Take home messages Catecholamines remain first line Levosimendan: 2nd or 3rd line for decompensated heart failure? Vasopressin: adjunct to noradrenaline in septic shock Terlipressin: potential option where vasopressin unavailable QUESTIONS ? [email protected].
Recommended publications
  • Pharmaceutical Services Division and the Clinical Research Centre Ministry of Health Malaysia
    A publication of the PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES DIVISION AND THE CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTRE MINISTRY OF HEALTH MALAYSIA MALAYSIAN STATISTICS ON MEDICINES 2008 Edited by: Lian L.M., Kamarudin A., Siti Fauziah A., Nik Nor Aklima N.O., Norazida A.R. With contributions from: Hafizh A.A., Lim J.Y., Hoo L.P., Faridah Aryani M.Y., Sheamini S., Rosliza L., Fatimah A.R., Nour Hanah O., Rosaida M.S., Muhammad Radzi A.H., Raman M., Tee H.P., Ooi B.P., Shamsiah S., Tan H.P.M., Jayaram M., Masni M., Sri Wahyu T., Muhammad Yazid J., Norafidah I., Nurkhodrulnada M.L., Letchumanan G.R.R., Mastura I., Yong S.L., Mohamed Noor R., Daphne G., Kamarudin A., Chang K.M., Goh A.S., Sinari S., Bee P.C., Lim Y.S., Wong S.P., Chang K.M., Goh A.S., Sinari S., Bee P.C., Lim Y.S., Wong S.P., Omar I., Zoriah A., Fong Y.Y.A., Nusaibah A.R., Feisul Idzwan M., Ghazali A.K., Hooi L.S., Khoo E.M., Sunita B., Nurul Suhaida B.,Wan Azman W.A., Liew H.B., Kong S.H., Haarathi C., Nirmala J., Sim K.H., Azura M.A., Asmah J., Chan L.C., Choon S.E., Chang S.Y., Roshidah B., Ravindran J., Nik Mohd Nasri N.I., Ghazali I., Wan Abu Bakar Y., Wan Hamilton W.H., Ravichandran J., Zaridah S., Wan Zahanim W.Y., Kannappan P., Intan Shafina S., Tan A.L., Rohan Malek J., Selvalingam S., Lei C.M.C., Ching S.L., Zanariah H., Lim P.C., Hong Y.H.J., Tan T.B.A., Sim L.H.B, Long K.N., Sameerah S.A.R., Lai M.L.J., Rahela A.K., Azura D., Ibtisam M.N., Voon F.K., Nor Saleha I.T., Tajunisah M.E., Wan Nazuha W.R., Wong H.S., Rosnawati Y., Ong S.G., Syazzana D., Puteri Juanita Z., Mohd.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 1/41
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2016 ATC code ATC group / Active substance (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit DDD/1000/ day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 167,8985 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0738 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0738 A01AB09 Miconazole (O) 7088 g 0,2 g 0,0738 A01AB12 Hexetidine (O) 1951200 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+ Benzocaine (dental) 30200 pieces A01AB82 Demeclocycline+ Triamcinolone (dental) 680 g A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+ Thymol (dental) 3094 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+ Cetylpyridinium chloride (gingival) 227150 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+ Cetrimide (O) 30900 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate (O) 864720 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+ Chamomille extract (O) 370080 g A01AD90 Lidocaine+ Paraformaldehyde (dental) 405 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 47,1312 A02A ANTACIDS 1,0133 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 1,0133 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 811120 pieces 10 pieces 0,1689 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+ Magnesium hydroxide (O) 3101974 ml 50 ml 0,1292 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+ Magnesium carbonate (O) 3434232 pieces 10 pieces 0,7152 DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 46,1179 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 2,3855 A02BA02 Ranitidine (O) 340327,5 g 0,3 g 2,3624 A02BA02 Ranitidine (P) 3318,25 g 0,3 g 0,0230 A02BC Proton pump inhibitors 43,7324 A02BC01 Omeprazole
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]
  • Simdax® Gives You Time in Acute Heart Failure
    SIMDAX ® GIVES YOU TIME IN ACUTE HEART FAILURE 1 SIMDAX® RELIEVES Improvement in clinical status Improved SYMPTOMS 20 p=0.015 19.4% 14.6% Levosimendan + SOC (n=299) IN AHF 10 Placebo + SOC (n=301) p=0.015 SIMDAX® improves symptoms of dyspnoea 0 and fatigue in acute heart failure. In the The primary endpoint result in the -10 REVIVE trial1, composite consisting Phase III regulatory study REVIVE, symptoms of patients’ subjective symptom -19.4% assessments (at 6 hours, 24 hours, over the 5-day assessment period improved -20 and 5 days) and signs of worsening -27.2% symptoms (including death) during significantly more with SIMDAX® than with Patients improved or worsened (%) the 5 days after starting drug -30 Worsened infusion. placebo when administered on top of the standard of care.1 Improvement in dyspnea 100 Generalized linear model p=0.018 Levosimendan + SOC (n=299) 90 Placebo + SOC (n=301) 80 Effects of levosimendan vs 70 placebo on top of standard of care on dyspnea in patients with AHF.4 60 Patients improved (%)* 6 hrs 24 hrs 48 hrs Day 3 Day 5 Reference: 1. Packer M. et al. JCHF. 2013;1(2): 103-11. *Includes mild, moderate and marked improvement on a 7-point scale 2 …WITH SUSTAINED HEMODYNAMIC AND Levosimendan + SOC (n=299) NEUROHORMONAL EFFECTS Placebo + SOC (n=301) The hemodynamic effects of SIMDAX® Sustained hemodynamic effects on cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary 1 CO (L/min) Max capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) have been End PCWP (mmHg) 0 1-3 24-hr infusion Figure 1: Duration of action of shown in several clinical trials.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 1/44
    Estonian Statistics on Medicines 2013 DDD/1000/ ATC code ATC group / INN (rout of admin.) Quantity sold Unit DDD Unit day A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 146,8152 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 0,0760 A01AB Antiinfectives and antiseptics for local oral treatment 0,0760 A01AB09 Miconazole(O) 7139,2 g 0,2 g 0,0760 A01AB12 Hexetidine(O) 1541120 ml A01AB81 Neomycin+Benzocaine(C) 23900 pieces A01AC Corticosteroids for local oral treatment A01AC81 Dexamethasone+Thymol(dental) 2639 ml A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment A01AD80 Lidocaine+Cetylpyridinium chloride(gingival) 179340 g A01AD81 Lidocaine+Cetrimide(O) 23565 g A01AD82 Choline salicylate(O) 824240 pieces A01AD83 Lidocaine+Chamomille extract(O) 317140 g A01AD86 Lidocaine+Eugenol(gingival) 1128 g A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 35,6598 A02A ANTACIDS 0,9596 Combinations and complexes of aluminium, calcium and A02AD 0,9596 magnesium compounds A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 591680 pieces 10 pieces 0,1261 A02AD81 Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium hydroxide(O) 1998558 ml 50 ml 0,0852 A02AD82 Aluminium aminoacetate+Magnesium oxide(O) 463540 pieces 10 pieces 0,0988 A02AD83 Calcium carbonate+Magnesium carbonate(O) 3049560 pieces 10 pieces 0,6497 A02AF Antacids with antiflatulents Aluminium hydroxide+Magnesium A02AF80 1000790 ml hydroxide+Simeticone(O) DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND GASTRO- A02B 34,7001 OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 3,5364 A02BA02 Ranitidine(O) 494352,3 g 0,3 g 3,5106 A02BA02 Ranitidine(P)
    [Show full text]
  • Vasopressors and Inotropes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Vasopressors and Inotropes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 1, 2, 1 3 Mina Karami y , Veemal V. Hemradj y, Dagmar M. Ouweneel , Corstiaan A. den Uil , Jacqueline Limpens 4, Luuk C. Otterspoor 5, Alexander P. Vlaar 6 , Wim K. Lagrand 6 and José P. S. Henriques 1,* 1 Heart Center, Department of Interventional Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (D.M.O.) 2 Department of Cardiology, Isala, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Departments of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 5 Heart Center Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; [email protected] 6 Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (A.P.V.); [email protected] (W.K.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These two authors contributed equally. y Received: 5 May 2020; Accepted: 25 June 2020; Published: 30 June 2020 Abstract: Vasopressors and inotropes are routinely used in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) related cardiogenic shock (CS) to improve hemodynamics. We aimed to investigate the effect of routinely used vasopressor and inotropes on mortality in AMI related CS. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL was performed up to 20 February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol
    Product: Omecamtiv Mecarbil (AMG 423) Protocol Number: 20110203 Date: 13 November 2018 Page 1 of 85 Title: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Mortality and Morbidity in Subjects With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Amgen Protocol Number (Omecamtiv Mecarbil [AMG 423]) 20110203 EudraCT number 2016-002299-28 NCT Number NCT02929329 GALACTIC-HF Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure Clinical Study Sponsor: Amgen Inc. One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799 Telephone: 1-805-447-1000 Key Sponsor Contact(s): One Amgen Center Drive Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799 Phone: Email: Date: 31 August 2016 Amendment 1 07 September 2017 Amendment 2 13 November 2018 Confidentiality Notice This document contains confidential information of Amgen Inc. Approved This document must not be disclosed to anyone other than the site study staff and members of the institutional review board/independent ethics committee/institutional scientific review board or equivalent. The information in this document cannot be used for any purpose other than the evaluation or conduct of the clinical investigation without the prior written consent of Amgen Inc. If you have questions regarding how this document may be used or shared, call the Amgen Medical Information number: US sites, 1-800-77-AMGEN, Canadian sites, 1-866-50-AMGEN; all other countries call 1-800-772-6436. Amgen’s general number in the US (1-805-447-1000). CONFIDENTIAL Product: Omecamtiv Mecarbil (AMG 423) Protocol Number: 20110203 Date: 13 November 2018 Page 2 of 85 Investigator’s Agreement I have read the attached protocol entitled A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Mortality and Morbidity in Subjects with Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction, dated 13 November 2018, and agree to abide by all provisions set forth therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calcium Sensitizer Levosimendan Improves Human Diaphragm Function
    Page 1 of 41 The calcium sensitizer levosimendan improves human diaphragm function Jonne Doorduin MSc 1, Christer A Sinderby PhD 5,7 , Jennifer Beck PhD 6,7 , Dick F Stegeman PhD 2,4 , Hieronymus WH van Hees PhD 3, Johannes G van der Hoeven MD 1, and Leo MA Heunks MD 1 1Department of Critical Care Medicine, 2Department of Neurology and 3Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands; 4Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Research Institute MOVE, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 5Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 6Department of Pediatrics, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada; 7Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada. Address for correspondents and requests: Leo Heunks, MD, PhD Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Department of Critical Care Medicine Geert Grooteplein zuid 10 6525 GA Nijmegen The Netherlands tel. : +31 24 36 17273 fax. : +31 24 35 41612 [email protected] Page 2 of 41 Author’s contributions Literature search: JD, LH; Study design: JD, CS, JB, DS, LH; Data collection: JD, LH; Data analysis: JD, LH; Data interpretation: JD, CS, JB, DS, HH, JH, LH; Writing: JD, CS, JB, DS, HH, JH, LH. Source of funding This study was investigator initiated and financed by institutional resources. This study was designed and conducted by the authors without involvement of Orion Pharma, or any other commercial party. Data analysis and writing the manuscript was performed by the authors without involvement of a commercial party. Levosimendan and placebo were an unrestricted gift from Orion Pharma (Espoo Finland).
    [Show full text]
  • Tecoland API Product List Sr No Name
    Tecoland API Product List Sr No Name 1 Meropenem 2 Vancomycin HCl 3 Dexrazoxane HCl 4 Levosimendan 5 Enfuvirtide 6 Clindamycin Phosphate 7 Vecuronium Bromide 8 Irinotecan HCl 9 Caspofungin 10 Methotrexate Sodium 11 Paclitaxel 12 Piperacillin + Tazobactam 13 Neomycin Sulfate 14 Ampicillin/sulbactam sodium 15 Atazanavir Sulfate 16 Cisatracurium Besylate 17 Docetaxel Anhydrous 18 Teicoplanin 19 Dexmedetomidine HCl 20 L-Carnitine Base 21 Rocuronium Bromide 22 Efinaconazole 23 Lamivudine 24 Amifostine 25 Cisplatin 26 Enoxaparin Sodium 27 Dexmedetomidine Base 28 Cephradine 29 Ampicillin sodium Tecoland API Product List Sr No Name 30 Sodium Nitroprusside 31 Ertapenem sodium 32 Loratadine 33 Docetaxel Trihydrate 34 Mitoxantrone Hcl 35 Linezolid 36 Esmolol HCl 37 Cefotaxime sodium 38 Bosentan monohydrate 39 Ezetimibe 40 Sevoflurane 41 Hydrocortisone base 42 Leflunomide 43 Fludarabine phosphate 44 Moxifloxacin HCl 45 Montelukast Sodium 46 Amphotericin B 47 Palonosetron Hcl 48 Ifosfamide 49 Ceftazidime 50 Nitrofurantoin 51 Lincomycin HCl 52 Cephapirin Benzathine 53 Lopinavir 54 Mesna 55 Erlotinib HCl 56 Granisetron HCl 57 Hyaluronate Sodium 58 Temozolomide Tecoland API Product List Sr No Name 59 Pyridoxine HCl 60 Suxamethonium Chloride 61 Tetracycline HCl 62 Hydralazine HCl 63 Glatiramer Acetate 64 Penciclovir 65 Cyclosporine 66 Irbesartan 67 Flumazenil 68 Calcium Folinate 69 Felodipine 70 Anidulafungin 71 cytarabine 72 Travoprost 73 Sugammadex Sodium 74 Oritavancin 75 Milrinone 76 Benzocaine 77 Simvastatin 78 Fosaprepitant dimeglumine 79 Oseltamivir
    [Show full text]
  • AHRQ Healthcare Horizon Scanning System – Status Update Horizon
    AHRQ Healthcare Horizon Scanning System – Status Update Horizon Scanning Status Update: July 2014 Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA290201000006C Prepared by: ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 July 2014 Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA290201000006C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A novel intervention may not appear in this report simply because the System has not yet detected it. The list of novel interventions in the Horizon Scanning Status Update Report will change over time as new information is collected. This should not be construed as either endorsements or rejections of specific interventions. As topics are entered into the System, individual target technology reports are developed for those that appear to be closer to diffusion into practice in the United States. A representative from AHRQ served as a Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative and provided input during the implementation of the horizon scanning system. AHRQ did not directly participate in the horizon scanning, assessing the leads or topics, or provide opinions regarding potential impact of interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Levosimendan in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Levosimendan in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis Received: 8 February 2018 Accepted: 8 May 2018 and trial sequential analysis of Published: xx xx xxxx randomized trials Zhenhua Xing , Liang Tang, Pengfei Chen, Jiabing Huang, Xiaofan peng & Xinqun Hu Patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) undergoing cardiac surgery have a high mortality rate. Levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer, improves myocardial contractility without increasing myocardial oxygen demand. It is not clear whether levosimendan can reduce mortality in cardiac surgery patients with LVD. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched to identify randomized trials comparing levosimendan with conventional treatment in cardiac surgery patients with LVD. We derived pooled risk ratios (RRs) with random efects models. The primary endpoint was perioperative mortality. Secondary endpoints were renal replacement treatment, atrial fbrillation, myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, and hypotension. Fifteen studies enrolling 2606 patients were included. Levosimendan reduced the incidence of perioperative mortality (RR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.45–0.91) and renal replacement treatment (RR:0.71, 95%CI:0.52–0.95). However, sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) indicated that more evidence was needed. Furthermore, levosimendan did not reduce the incidence of atrial fbrillation (RR:0.82, 95%CI:0.64–1.07), myocardial infarction (RR:0.56, 95%CI:0.26–1.23), or ventricular arrhythmia (RR:0.74, 95%CI:0.49–1.11), but it increased the incidence of hypotension (RR:1.11,95%CI:1.00–1.23). There was not enough high-quality evidence to either support or contraindicate the use of levosimendan in cardiac surgery patients with LVD.
    [Show full text]