Supporting Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supporting Information Supporting Information Wirta et al. 10.1073/pnas.1316990111 SI Text our success levels from field-caught samples may be considered 1. Performance and Validation of the Molecular Methods. Molecular high by comparison. analysis of parasitoid linkages. With PCR-primers designed to se- lectively amplify the DNA of the host order but not the parasitoid, 2. Incidence of Multiple Host and Parasitoid Sequences from the Same we successfully amplified and sequenced a host from 21.9% of 457 Individual. Incidence of multiple host sequences in the same parasitoid parasitoids caught as adults. However, the rate of sequence re- individual. Our MAPL-AP analyses revealed evidence of two different covery was significantly lower for species of braconids than host species in seven individuals of parasitoid wasps (all family ichneumonids and tachinids [Braconidae, n = 34 (2.9%); Ichneumonidae). In a single individual of Aoplus groenlandicus,both Ichneumonidae, n = 346 (24.0%); and Tachinidae, n = 77 Entephria polata and Sympistis nigrita were found; in Buathra labo- (20.8%); χ2 = 8.09, df = 2, P = 0.02). Interestingly, seven rator,bothGynaephora groenlandica and Euxoa adumbrata were ichneumonid specimens yielded sequences from two different found; in two Cryptus arcticus specimens, G. groenlandica was host species, as recovered from two separate body parts or found with Syngrapha parilis in one and S. nigrita in the other; from two different pieces of the abdomen (SI Text, section 2). For in Mesochorus n. sp., both G. groenlandica and S. nigrita were found; eight parasitoid species represented by only a few individuals andintwoPimpla sodalis specimens, G. groenlandica and S. parilis in our sample, no host could be identified through molecular were found in one and E. polata and S. nigrita were found in the analysis of parasitoid linkages–adult parasitoid (MAPL-AP) other. In each case, these different host sequences were recovered (Table S1). from two separate body parts or from two different pieces of the MAPL-host larvae. The selective amplification and sequencing of parasitoid abdomen analyzed as separate samples. For each of these parasitoid DNA from host tissue yielded a parasitoid sequence cases, one of the host sequences likely represents the host that was from 20.9% of 1,195 hosts examined. Of these host larvae, 6.1% fed upon by the parasitoid as a larva, whereas the other sequence were parasitized by an ichneumonid, 12.3% by a braconid, and was acquired from a host that was oviposited upon by the adult 2.4% by a tachinid. The level of parasitism detected varied parasitoids. In three of the seven cases, one host sequence was considerably among host species, ranging from 0% to 44% among unequivocally detected in a tissue sample consisting of the ovipos- species represented by more than one individual. In 2 of 12 host itor only, suggesting acquisition of DNA during oviposition or species included in this study no parasitoids were discovered, while probing a potential host. In the other four cases, oviposition likely due to small sample size (Table S1). emerges as a possible source of the secondary host sequence, al- Recovery of parasitoid sequences from visibly parasitized host larvae. though host feeding by the adult parasitoid cannot be ruled out. When using MAPL-host larvae (HL), the true level of parasit- Incidence of multiple parasitoid sequences in the same host individual. In ism in the sample is unknown (this contrasts with the situation for our MAPL-HL analyses, sequences of two separate parasitoid MAPL-AP, where each parasitoid must have fed on a host as taxa were discovered in 11 host individuals. In most cases (n = 7), a larva). To verify if our MAPL-HL protocol accurately detects the co-occurring taxa were primary parasitoids, whereas in 4 parasitoids when present, we analyzed a subset of host individuals cases, one of the taxa was a secondary parasitoid Mesochorus n. where the presence of a parasitoid larva was detected during sp. In all 11 cases, one of the parasitoids was a member of the sample preparation. Of 30 such samples, 80.0% yielded a para- family Braconidae whereas the other belonged to the Ichneu- sitoid sequence. This suggests that the true level of parasitism is monidae. The co-occurring parasitoids were Cotesia spp. and slightly higher than observed by MAPL-HL in the current study, Mesochorus n. sp. in Boloria chariclea, two cases of Microplitis a discrepancy potentially related to the specificity of the primers lugubris and Mesochorus n. sp. in B. chariclea, Cotesia spp. and used (SI Text, section 6). Nonetheless, the parasitism rate esti- Hyposoter frigidus in Polia richardsoni, M. lugubris and H. frigidus mated by MAPL-HL (20.9%) was still higher than that estimated in another Polia richardsoni, M. lugubris and Mesochorus n. sp. in by rearing (16%; ref. 1). S. nigrita, two cases of M. lugubris and Campoletis horstmanni Recovery of host sequences from wild-caught versus reared parasitoid in S. nigrita, M. lugubris and H. frigidus in another S. nigrita, individuals. To verify that MAPL-AP correctly identifies the host M. lugubris and C. horstmanni in S. parilis,andM. lugubris and use of adult parasitoids, we compared a set of 422 wild-caught H. frigidus in S. parilis (the first listed parasitoid is the braconid individuals to a set of 35 parasitoids reared from known hosts. and the second is the ichneumonid). Within these sets, a host sequence was successfully recovered from The incidence of multiple parasitoids in the same hosts (mul- 22.5% of the wild-caught individuals, compared with 17% of the tiparasitism) might have been underestimated by the methods that reared individuals. Hence, the recovery rate was similar among we used. As we used Sanger sequencing (3), and sequenced only materials (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.50). one PCR product, we might have failed to detect co-occurrence Overall, our success in detecting the host sequence from adult of two confamilial parasitoids in the same host individual. In parasitoids was comparable to that of Rougerie et al. (2), who future studies, additional sequencing of PCR products by next applied a method similar to MAPL-AP to reared parasitoid generation techniques may improve quantification of cases of specimens. Targeting adults of 3 parasitoid species in 2 families, multiparasitism. Rougerie et al. (2) detected a host in 24% of individuals, whereas our detection rate of 20.9% applies to a wider range of 3. Estimations of Link Richness and Sample Coverage. Methods. No parasitoid species (20 species from 2 wasp families and 1 fly finite sample will reveal all species or all interactions in a food web. family). Ultimately, the success rate in discovering remains of To examine how well our samples and methods describe the set of host DNA will be constrained by the limited amounts of DNA trophic links in the Lepidoptera–parasitoid community at Zack- remaining in the gut of the parasitoid after metamorphosis, as well enberg, we used methods originally developed for the estimation as by the degradation of this DNA during both larval development of species richness to estimate the total number of different tro- and adult life span before collection (discussed by ref. 2). As phic links in our target community. For this, we used two non- Rougerie et al. (2) sampled their parasitoids directly after emer- parametric estimators: Chao1 (4, 5) and the abundance-based gence (thus minimizing the degradation of DNA after emergence), coverage estimator (ACE) (6, 7). Chao1 provides an estimate of Wirta et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/1316990111 1of6 yet-undetected links based on the frequency of singletons provide a molecular toolset of prime utility in exploring the (trophic links revealed only once) and doubletons (trophic links structure of host–parasitoid food webs. revealed only twice) in the sample. ACE employs information on link types encountered at slightly higher frequencies. 4. Methodological Provisos. Using host larvae as the only in- Sample size variation not only influences the detection of in- formation source to describe trophic interactions may lead to dividual links by a particular method, but it also affects the links involving idiobiont parasitoids going undetected (see Results number of links jointly detected by multiple methods. Consider and Fig. 1). On the other hand, the use of adult parasitoids as the the case where a set of interactions is sampled by two methods, sole source of information might cause similar problems. As each with a small sample size. Under this scenario, one method DNA degrades in the gut of the parasitoid, individuals caught long will reveal a subset of all interactions, whereas the other method after their emergence may no longer carry host DNA of sufficient will detect another subset, with limited overlap between methods. quality to allow their identification. Finally, a sample of adult par- Although our sample sizes were reasonably large, they varied asitoids alone would not reveal parasitism levels suffered by the among methods (n = 457 for MAPL-AP, n = 1195 for MAPL- host, which is indeed an important dimension of interaction struc- HL, and n = 1420 for rearing). Naturally, more species will be ture. Thus, an adequate description of the interaction web can only detected by any methodological approach if sample size is in- be built on a combination of multiple sources of information. creased. To examine the complementarity of different methods Interpretation of trophic associations. Although the detection of para- while adjusting for differences in sample size, we applied the sitoid DNA in a living host larva (MAPL-HL) offers proof of an Chao1 estimator modified to derive the true number of species interspecific interaction, it is not sufficient proof of a feeding as- sociation that will lead to host death.
Recommended publications
  • ELIZABETH LOCKARD SKILLEN Diversity of Parasitic Hymenoptera
    ELIZABETH LOCKARD SKILLEN Diversity of Parasitic Hymenoptera (Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Eastern North American Forests (Under the direction of JOHN PICKERING) I examined species richness and composition of Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) parasitoids in cut and uncut forests and before and after fire in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee (GSMNP). I also compared alpha and beta diversity along a latitudinal gradient in Eastern North America with sites in Ontario, Maryland, Georgia, and Florida. Between 1997- 2000, I ran insect Malaise traps at 6 sites in two habitats in GSMNP. Sites include 2 old-growth mesic coves (Porters Creek and Ramsay Cascades), 2 second-growth mesic coves (Meigs Post Prong and Fish Camp Prong) and 2 xeric ridges (Lynn Hollow East and West) in GSMNP. I identified 307 species (9,716 individuals): 165 campoplegine species (3,273 individuals) and a minimum of 142 ichneumonine species (6,443 individuals) from 6 sites in GSMNP. The results show the importance of habitat differences when examining ichneumonid species richness at landscape scales. I report higher richness for both subfamilies combined in the xeric ridge sites (Lynn Hollow West (114) and Lynn Hollow East (112)) than previously reported peaks at mid-latitudes, in Maryland (103), and lower than Maryland for the two cove sites (Porters Creek, 90 and Ramsay Cascades, 88). These subfamilies appear to have largely recovered 70+ years after clear-cutting, yet Campopleginae may be more susceptible to logging disturbance. Campopleginae had higher species richness in old-growth coves and a 66% overlap in species composition between previously cut and uncut coves.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States Author(S): Diego J
    Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States Author(s): Diego J. Inclan and John O. Stireman, III Source: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104(2):287-296. Published By: Entomological Society of America https://doi.org/10.1603/AN10047 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/AN10047 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY AND BIODIVERSITY Tachinid (Diptera: Tachinidae) Parasitoid Diversity and Temporal Abundance at a Single Site in the Northeastern United States 1 DIEGO J. INCLAN AND JOHN O. STIREMAN, III Department of Biological Sciences, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, 235A, BH, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435 Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104(2): 287Ð296 (2011); DOI: 10.1603/AN10047 ABSTRACT Although tachinids are one of the most diverse families of Diptera and represent the largest group of nonhymenopteran parasitoids, their local diversity and distribution patterns of most species in the family are poorly known.
    [Show full text]
  • European Format of Cv
    EUROPEAN FORMAT OF CV PERSONAL INFORMATION Name Kolarov Janko Angelov Address 236 Bulgaria Boul., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria Tel. +359 32 261721 Fax +359 32 964 689 E-mail [email protected] Nationality Bulgarian Date of birth 20.06.1947 Length of service • Date (from-to) 2009-2014 Professor in Faculty of Pedagogy, University of Plovdiv 2000-2009 Associated professor in Faculty of Pedagogy, University of Plovdiv 1990-2000 Associated professor in Biological faculty, University of Sofia 1983-1990 A research worker of entomology in Institute of introduction and plant resources, Sadovo 1981-1983 Senior teacher of biology in Medical university, Plovdiv 1972-1981 Teacher Education and teaching 1996 Doctor of science 1980 PHD 1973 Magister of biology Mother tongue Bulgarian Other languages [RUSSIAN} [ENGLISH} [GERMAN} • reading excellent good middle • writing excellent good middle • conversation excellent good middle Participation in projects 2010-2012 Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nin Cryptinae (Hymenoptera: Position Ichneumonidae) Altfamilyası üzerinde sistematik, sayısal taksonomi ve moleküler filogeni çalışmaları (Turkey) – member of team 2009-2011 Project Nr. 5362 entitled “State of Entomofauna Along the Pipeline Baku-Tbilisi-Jeyhan (Azerbaijan Territory)”, with leader I. A. Nuriyeva - – member of team 2006-2007 Investigation of the Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera, Insecta) Fauna of Bulgaria – member of team 2004 A study of Ichneumonidae fauna of Isparta province, Turkey – member of team 2003 Fauna Еуропеа – member of team 1993 National strategy of protection of biological in Bulgaria – member of team Proffesional area Zoology Entomology Ecology Biogeography L I S T of the scientific works of Prof. DSc Janko Angelov Kolarov 1. Kolarov, J., 1977. Tryphoninae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Genera and Species unknown in Bulgarian Fauna up to now.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposing the Structure of an Arctic Food Web Helena K
    Exposing the structure of an Arctic food web Helena K. Wirta1,†, Eero J. Vesterinen2,†, Peter A. Hamback€ 3, Elisabeth Weingartner3, Claus Rasmussen4, Jeroen Reneerkens5,6, Niels M. Schmidt6, Olivier Gilg7,8 & Tomas Roslin1 1Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 5, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland 2Department of Biology, University of Turku, Vesilinnantie 5, FI-20014 Turku, Finland 3Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 4Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, DK–8000 Aarhus, Denmark 5Conservation Ecology Group, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands 6Arctic Research Centre, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark 7Laboratoire Biogeosciences, UMR CNRS 6282, Universite de Bourgogne, 6 Boulevard Gabriel, 21000 Dijon, France 8Groupe de Recherche en Ecologie Arctique, 16 rue de Vernot, 21440 Francheville, France Keywords Abstract Calidris, DNA barcoding, generalism, Greenland, Hymenoptera, molecular diet How food webs are structured has major implications for their stability and analysis, Pardosa, Plectrophenax, specialism, dynamics. While poorly studied to date, arctic food webs are commonly Xysticus. assumed to be simple in structure, with few links per species. If this is the case, then different parts of the web may be weakly connected to each other, with Correspondence populations and species united by only a low number of links. We provide the Helena K. Wirta, Department of Agricultural first highly resolved description of trophic link structure for a large part of a Sciences, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 5, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland. high-arctic food web.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Part I: a Checklist of the Subfamily Cryptinae with 32 New Records
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS AGRICULTURAE ET SILVICULTURAE MENDELIANAE BRUNENSIS Volume 65 19 Number 1, 2017 https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765010167 THE CATALOGUE OF ICHNEUMON WASPS OF SLOVA KIA (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE) PART I: A CHECKLIST OF THE SUBFAMILY CRYPTINAE WITH 32 NEW RECORDS Michal Rindoš1, Jozef Lukáš2, Vladimír Zeman3, Milada Holecová4 1Institute of Entomology CAS, Biology Centre, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic 2 Department of Ecology, Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mlynská dolina, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic 3 Tomáškova 421, 500 04 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic 4 Department of Zoology, Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mlynská dolina, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic Abstract RINDOŠ MICHAL, LUKÁŠ JOZEF, ZEMAN VLADIMÍR, HOLECOVÁ MILADA. 2017. The Catalogue of Ichneumon Wasps of Slovakia (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Part I: a Checklist of the Subfamily Cryptinae with 32 New Records. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(1): 0167–0170. The subfamily Cryptinae Kirby, 1837 is considered the largest group in the Ichneumonidae with more than 400 described genera including around 4500 species. The subfamily has a worldwide distribution and its members play a key role in the biological control as parasitoids of many important pests. The study provides a new and updated overview of the Slovakian ichneumonid fauna after 28 years. So far over 750 species of Ichneumonidae have been reported from Slovakia, including around 150 species in the subfamily Cryptinae. Our study presents a complete checklist of Cryptinae and adds 32 species to the Slovakian fauna. Keywords: Cryptinae, Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, parasitoids, Slovakia INTRODUCTION 1987), semiaquaticism (Frohne, 1939), and even echolocation (Quicke, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Awenda Provincial Park
    AWENDA PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Awenda Provincial Park in 2014 (44.82534, -79.98458, 231m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from April 29 – September 19, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 3029 BINs were obtained. Over half the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and true bugs (Hemiptera; Figure 2). In total, 595 arthropod species were named, representing 21.3% of the BINs from the Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Awenda Provincial site (Appendix 1). All the BINs were assigned at least Park in 2014. to family, and 54% were assigned to a genus (Appendix 2). Specimens collected from Awenda represent 214 different families and 705 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Hemiptera Coleoptera Trombidiformes Sarcoptiformes Psocodea Mesostigmata Araneae Entomobryomorpha Mecoptera Symphypleona Trichoptera Neuroptera Thysanoptera Dermaptera Pseudoscorpiones Stylommatophora Odonata Opiliones Orthoptera Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Awenda. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona kastoni Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna sublata Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps Ceraticelus fissiceps Ceratinella Ceratinella brunnea Ceratinops
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 • Principles of Conserving the Arctic's Biodiversity
    Chapter 10 Principles of Conserving the Arctic’s Biodiversity Lead Author Michael B. Usher Contributing Authors Terry V.Callaghan, Grant Gilchrist, Bill Heal, Glenn P.Juday, Harald Loeng, Magdalena A. K. Muir, Pål Prestrud Contents Summary . .540 10.1. Introduction . .540 10.2. Conservation of arctic ecosystems and species . .543 10.2.1. Marine environments . .544 10.2.2. Freshwater environments . .546 10.2.3. Environments north of the treeline . .548 10.2.4. Boreal forest environments . .551 10.2.5. Human-modified habitats . .554 10.2.6. Conservation of arctic species . .556 10.2.7. Incorporating traditional knowledge . .558 10.2.8. Implications for biodiversity conservation . .559 10.3. Human impacts on the biodiversity of the Arctic . .560 10.3.1. Exploitation of populations . .560 10.3.2. Management of land and water . .562 10.3.3. Pollution . .564 10.3.4. Development pressures . .566 10.4. Effects of climate change on the biodiversity of the Arctic . .567 10.4.1. Changes in distribution ranges . .568 10.4.2. Changes in the extent of arctic habitats . .570 10.4.3. Changes in the abundance of arctic species . .571 10.4.4. Changes in genetic diversity . .572 10.4.5. Effects on migratory species and their management . .574 10.4.6. Effects caused by non-native species and their management .575 10.4.7. Effects on the management of protected areas . .577 10.4.8. Conserving the Arctic’s changing biodiversity . .579 10.5. Managing biodiversity conservation in a changing environment . .579 10.5.1. Documenting the current biodiversity . .580 10.5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture
    USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses of Invertebrates to Temperature and Water Stress A
    Author's Accepted Manuscript Responses of invertebrates to temperature and water stress: A polar perspective M.J. Everatt, P. Convey, J.S. Bale, M.R. Worland, S.A.L. Hayward www.elsevier.com/locate/jtherbio PII: S0306-4565(14)00071-0 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.05.004 Reference: TB1522 To appear in: Journal of Thermal Biology Received date: 21 August 2013 Revised date: 22 January 2014 Accepted date: 22 January 2014 Cite this article as: M.J. Everatt, P. Convey, J.S. Bale, M.R. Worland, S.A.L. Hayward, Responses of invertebrates to temperature and water stress: A polar perspective, Journal of Thermal Biology, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jther- bio.2014.05.004 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Responses of invertebrates to temperature and water 2 stress: A polar perspective 3 M. J. Everatta, P. Conveyb, c, d, J. S. Balea, M. R. Worlandb and S. A. L. 4 Haywarda* a 5 School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK b 6 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, 7 Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK 8 cNational Antarctic Research Center, IPS Building, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, 9 Malaysia 10 dGateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand 11 12 *Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]