DOCSLIB.ORG

Performance-Based Work Statement (Pws) for Pacaf A-10 In-Theater Depot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Performance-Based Work Statement (Pws) for Pacaf A-10 In-Theater Depot PERFORMANCE-BASED WORK STATEMENT (PWS) FOR PACAF A-10 IN-THEATER DEPOT PURCHASE REQUEST NO.: F2DCAQ8324B001 22 February 2019 Prepared By Mr. Jerome Savikis OCONUS Depot Program Manager A-10 System Program Office (801) 777-4153 [email protected] A-10 System Program Office (WWA) Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC) 6058 Aspen Road, Bldg. 1285 Hill Air Force Base (AFB), UT 84056 FISCAL YEAR 19 Page 1 of 101 Record of Revisions Revision Number Date Description Basic 22 February 2019 FISCAL YEAR 19 Page 2 of 101 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) 5 2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 5 2.1. Scope 5 2.2. General Contractor Requirements 5 2.3. Facilities for Government Use 6 2.4. Terms Explained 7 2.5. Condemnation and Limitation on Repair 8 2.6. Accessory and Component Reuse, Repair, and Replacement 9 2.7. Contractor’s Workbook 10 2.8. Receipt of Aircraft at Contractor Facility 10 2.9. General Work Requirements 13 2.10. Specific Work Requirements 13 2.11. Final Processing of Aircraft 18 2.12. Over and Above Work Procedures 19 3. DATA 20 3.1. Maintenance Records, Forms, and Publications 20 3.2. Reporting Instructions 21 4. TECHNICAL ORDERS (TOS) AND OTHER DIRECTIVES 23 4.1. Technical Data 23 4.2. Compliance with Listed Publications 24 4.3. Applicable TOs 24 5. SERVICES SUMMARY 25 6. MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES 26 6.1. General Objectives 26 6.2. Program Status Reporting 27 6.3. Program Management Reviews 27 6.4. Program Kick-Off Meetings 28 6.5. Master Program Plan and Schedule 28 7. GENERAL INFORMATION 29 7.1. Security / Operations Security Requirements 29 7.2. Quality Control 30 7.3. Quality Assurance 30 7.4. Configuration Management 31 7.5. Environmental Controls 31 7.6. Government Observations 32 7.7. Safety Requirements 32 7.8. Training 32 7.9. Special Qualifications 33 FISCAL YEAR 19 Page 3 of 101 TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.10. Phase Out 34 7.11. Publications 34 7.12. Government Furnished Property and Services 35 7.13. Government Inspection and Acceptance of Deliverables 35 7.14. Data Ownership 35 APPENDIX 1 – ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS LIST 36 APPENDIX 2 – TECHNICAL ORDERS AND OTHER DIRECTIVES 39 APPENDIX 3 – A-10C STRUCTURAL COMPONENT S/N VERIFICATION 47 APPENDIX 4 – A-10C PAINT SPECIFICATIONS 48 APPENDIX 5 – A-10C SCHEDULED STRUCTURAL INSPECTION (SSI) 52 APPENDIX 6 – ENHANCED WING ASSEMBLY (EWA) 66 APPENDIX 7 – EIGHT YEAR CORROSION (8YC) 70 APPENDIX 8 – LEGACY WING SCHEDULED STRUCTURAL INSPECTION (SSI) 75 APPENDIX 9 – PYLON REWIRE 93 FISCAL YEAR 19 Page 4 of 101 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) 1. PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) 1.1. This Performance Work Statement (PWS) is prepared in accordance with (IAW) the Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) 14.3.1.5. 2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 2.1. SCOPE: This PWS defines depot-level maintenance required to sustain United States Air Force (USAF) A-10 aircraft. The objective of this contract is to acquire in-theater Contractor Maintenance Support to accomplish the work requirements specified herein. This PWS is a binding agreement between the U.S. Government (USG) and the contractor. The scope of this contract remains in effect under the terms of the basic contract and all applicable modifications until completion of the contract’s duration or exhaustion of the contract ceiling. The following general tasks are to be completed under this effort: 2.1.1. Acronyms and Abbreviations List – Appendix 1 2.1.2. Technical Orders and Other Directives – Appendix 2 2.1.3. A-10C Structural Component S/N Verification – Appendix 3 2.1.3. A-10C Paint Specifications – Appendix 4 2.1.4. A-10C Scheduled Structural Inspection (SSI) – Appendix 5 2.1.5. Enhanced Wing Assembly (EWA) – Appendix 6 2.1.6. Eight Year Corrosion (8YC) – Appendix 7 2.1.7. Legacy Wing Scheduled Structural Inspection – Appendix 8 2.1.8. Pylon Rewire – Appendix 9 2.1.9. Additional depot-level inspection, repair, and modification programs may arise in the future. All additional work requirements will be negotiated or accomplished using over-and- above work procedures. Revisions or supplements to this PWS will be added as needed through bi-lateral contract modifications. 2.2. GENERAL CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS 2.2.1. The contractor shall provide all facilities, equipment, Contractor Furnished Equipment/Contractor Furnished Material (CFE/CFM), and manpower to accomplish all work activities. 2.2.2. The contractor facility shall be located at an airport capable of receiving and servicing A- 10C. Facility shall be located within 400 nautical miles of Osan Air Base, South Korea. 2.2.3. The contractor shall furnish all parts and materials except USAF managed items supplied as Government Furnished Equipment/Government Furnished Material GFE/GFM as authorized in Appendix B of the contract see Government Furnished Property and Services paragraph 7.13. CFE/CFM shall be requisitioned using the MILSTRIP system. When required parts/materials are not available in MILSTRIP, the contractor shall requisition the CFE/CFM from USG approved sources or local manufacture in accordance with the technical data package. The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring all aircraft (A/C) parts meet flight worthiness standards and certification. FISCAL YEAR 19 Page 5 of 101 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) 2.2.4. The contractor shall possess local manufacturing capability for material and support equipment necessary to complete work requirements in cases when such material/equipment is not available from USG approved sources and local manufacture is authorized by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). 2.2.5 The contractor shall furnish all parts and materials except USAF managed items supplied as GFE/GFM as identified in Appendix B of the contract. CFE/CFM may be requisitioned using the MILSTRIP system. When required parts/materials are not available in MILSTRIP, the contractor shall requisition the CFE/CFM from USG approved sources or local manufacture in accordance with the technical data package. The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring all aircraft parts meet flight worthiness standards and certification. Local manufacture requests shall be submitted using the AFMC Form 202 process for parts listed in the Illustrated Parts Breakdown (IPB) with a Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability (SMR) Code of procurable with no assets available through MILSTRIP or surplus. For parts with an SMR Code of Manufacture (starting with MO, MF, MD or XC) an AFMC Form 202 is not required. Reference Technical Order (TO) 00-25-195 AF Technical Order System Source, Maintenance, and Recoverability Coding of Air Force Weapons, Systems, and Equipment for SMR code breakdown. Local manufacture requests shall be submitted using the Air Force Material Command (AFMC) Form 202 process IAW paragraph 4.1.3. Submission of additional 202 requests is not required on locally manufacture parts that have been approved with an AFMC Form 202 by the A-10 SPO Engineering Group during the current contract. 2.2.6. The contractor shall be capable of meeting all applicable requirements in order to accept first A/C induction and begin work within six (6) months of contract award. Minimum requirements include facility preparation/upgrade, equipment acquisition, technical order library, compliance with all personnel training and certification requirements, approved safety, security, quality, and management plans, and compliance with Ground and Flight Risk contract clause (252.228-7001). The contractor shall coordinate closely with the USG Program Manager to ensure required GFE/GFM is received and develop mitigation options for items not readily available. 2.3. FACILITIES FOR GOVERNMENT USE 2.3.1. The primary work site is the Contractor’s facility. 2.3.2. The Contractor grants to the U.S. Government the right to utilize office space, together with light, heat, office furniture, local telephone service, and other services required, for administrative purposes associated with this contract. All of the space, utilities, and services mentioned herein will be furnished at no additional cost to the U.S. Government. 2.3.3. The Contractor is responsible for all facility maintenance directly related to A-10 contract. 2.3.4. Government Plant Representatives/Government Ground Flight Representative (GGFR) Office: The Contractor shall make office and working spaces available to the Government for Contract Administration Services (CAS) functions at its aircraft and maintenance facility (if not already established), as follows: FISCAL YEAR 19 Page 6 of 101 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) 2.3.4.1. Custodial services to include trash removal, sweeping, vacuuming, mopping, dusting and waxing of floors surfaces. Custodial services provided shall coincide with Contractor’s daily schedule for similar services. 2.3.4.2. Telecommunication Services (Voice/Phone). The designated DCMA office will be provided voice/phone line service for calls that does not incur any costs such as emergency response (119 or equivalent), international toll-free connections, and local calls. The Contractor shall receive written approval from the PCO before incurring any costs associated with long-distance or international calling. For U.S. Government personnel outside of the DCMA agency that requires use of long-distance or international calling, the designated unit shall pay for incurred telecommunication service charges, as applicable. 2.3.4.3. Telecommunication Services (Data/Peripheral). The designated DCMA office will provide their own data/peripheral network connections in accordance with DCMA instructions. If Contractor networks are available for use, DCMA personnel will exercise existing DCMA instructions to initially receive approval to connect to these networks. The Contractor shall receive written approval from the PCO before incurring any costs associated with data/peripheral services. For U.S. Government personnel outside of the DCMA Agency that require data connection to the Contractor’s network and applicable peripherals such as printing and facsimiles, the designated unit shall pay for incurred telecommunication service charges, as applicable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaman Corporation · Annual Report 2016 Powering the Future Corporate and Shareholder Information Kaman Corporation and Subsidiaries
    PEOPLE POWERING THE FUTURE KAMAN CORPORATION · ANNUAL REPORT 2016 POWERING THE FUTURE CORPORATE AND SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION KAMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS Kaman Corporation 1332 Blue Hills Avenue Bloomfield, Connecticut 06002 (860) 243-7100 STOCK LISTING Kaman Corporation’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol KAMN. INVESTOR, MEDIA, AND PUBLIC RELATIONS CONTACT Eric B. Remington Vice President, Investor Relations (860) 243-6334 [email protected] ANNUAL MEETING The Annual Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 9:00 am local time at the offices of the Company, 1332 Blue Hills Avenue, Bloomfield, Connecticut, 06002. TRANSFER AGENT Computershare P.O. Box 30170 College Station, Texas 77842-3170 (866) 339-2742 www.computershare.com/investor Overnight correspondence should be sent to: Computershare 211 Quality Circle, Suite 210 College Station, Texas 77845 PEOPLE POWERING INNOVATION PEOPLE POWERING VALUE-ADDED SOLUTIONS PEOPLE POWERING GLOBAL SUCCESS PEOPLE POWERING NEW RELATIONSHIPS PEOPLE POWERING KAMAN KAMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2016 1 “ When I consider the future of Kaman, it’s the people who inspire the most confi dence in our continued success. We have an exceptional team across all of our businesses. They are truly the future of this company.” Neal J. Keating Chairman, President and Chief Executive Offi cer DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, When thinking about Kaman’s future, what excites me delivering outstanding experiences to our customers, most is not our products, solutions, technologies, and resulting in record satisfaction scores. In Aerospace, infrastructure, important as these are to our continued strong growth put pressure on our people to step up success.
    [Show full text]
  • Build> Plan> Deliver>
    2/18/12 4:53 PM > deliver > build > plan Kaman corporation AnnuAl RepoRt 2011 plan> build> deliver> Kaman Aerospace produces complex metallic and composite structures for commercial and military aircraft, military and bomb fuzing systems for the U.S. and allied militaries, our SH–2G Super Seasprite maritime helicopters and K–MAX medium-to-heavy lift helicopters, and proprietary aircraft components. Kaman Industrial Distribution is one of the nation’s leading industrial distributors, offering a wide variety of bearings, and transmission, motion control, material handling and electrical components. 227976_Kaman_CVR_R2.indd 2 annual report 2011 Two thousand and eleven was a strong year for Kaman, with double-digit increases in revenues and income over 2010. This performance is the direct result of a long-term strategic growth plan which we continue to implement. In every area of our opera tions, we develop a PLAN that is both ambitious and realistic, then build our company’s future through careful execution. The result: Kaman was able to deliver strong performance in 2011, positioning our company for continued growth in the future. 227976_Kaman_Text_R5.indd 1 2/21/12 6:46 AM neal j. keating Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer We have always been a company focused on the future, developing strategies “ that will enable us to meet the changing needs of the industries we serve. ” 227976_Kaman_Text_R5.indd 2 2/21/12 6:46 AM DEAR SHAREHOLDERS, Strong revenue and earnings growth, along with significant progress toward achieving our long-term strategic goals, combined to make 2011 an outstanding year for Kaman. While the economic outlook remains uncertain, I am confident that Kaman is making meaningful progress in both of our businesses, with the products, services and most importantly, the people we need to continue to prosper.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War Turning Back the Clock 93 Year Old Arctic Convoy Veteran Visits Russian Ship
    Military Despatches Vol 33 March 2020 Myths and misconceptions Things we still get wrong about the Vietnam War Turning back the clock 93 year old Arctic Convoy veteran visits Russian ship Battle of Ia Drang First battle between the Americans and NVA For the military enthusiast CONTENTS March 2020 Click on any video below to view How much do you know about movie theme songs? Take our quiz and find out. Hipe’s Wouter de The old South African Page 14 Goede interviews former Defence Force used 28’s gang boss David a mixture of English, South Vietnamese Williams. Afrikaans, slang and techno-speak that few Special Forces outside the military could hope to under- stand. Some of the terms Features 32 were humorous, some Weapons and equipment were clever, while others 6 We look at some of the uniforms were downright crude. Ten myths about Vietnam and equipment used by the US Marine Corps in Vietnam dur- Although it ended almost 45 ing the 1960s years ago, there are still many Part of Hipe’s “On the myths and misconceptions 34 couch” series, this is an about the Vietnam War. We A matter of survival 26 interview with one of look at ten myths and miscon- This month we look at fish and author Herman Charles ceptions. ‘Mad Mike’ dies aged 100 fishing for survival. Bosman’s most famous 20 Michael “Mad Mike” Hoare, characters, Oom Schalk widely considered one of the 30 Turning back the clock Ranks Lourens. Hipe spent time in world’s best known mercenary, A taxi driver was shot When the Russian missile cruis- has died aged 100.
    [Show full text]
  • KA-6D Intruder - 1971
    KA-6D Intruder - 1971 United States Type: Tanker (Air Refueling) Min Speed: 300 kt Max Speed: 570 kt Commissioned: 1971 Length: 16.7 m Wingspan: 16.2 m Height: 4.8 m Crew: 2 Empty Weight: 12070 kg Max Weight: 27500 kg Max Payload: 15870 kg Propulsion: 2x J52-P-409 Weapons / Loadouts: - 300 USG Drop Tank - Drop Tank. OVERVIEW: The Grumman A-6 Intruder was an American, twin jet-engine, mid-wing all-weather attack aircraft built by Grumman Aerospace. In service with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps between 1963 and 1997, the Intruder was designed as an all-weather medium attack aircraft to replace the piston-engined Douglas A-1 Skyraider. As the A-6E was slated for retirement, its precision strike mission was taken over by the Grumman F-14 Tomcat equipped with a LANTIRN pod. From the A-6, a specialized electronic warfare derivative, the EA-6 was developed. DETAILS: The A-6's design team was led by Lawrence Mead, Jr. He later played a lead role in the design of the Grumman F-14 Tomcat and the Lunar Excursion Module. The jet nozzles were originally designed to swivel downwards for shorter takeoffs and landings. This feature was initially included on prototype aircraft, but was removed from the design during flight testing. The cockpit used an unusual double pane windscreen and side-by-side seating arrangement in which the pilot sat in the left seat, while the bombardier/navigator sat to the right and slightly below. The incorporation of an additional crew member with separate responsibilities, along with a unique cathode ray tube (CRT) display that provided a synthetic display of terrain ahead, enabled low-level attack in all weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Flight Dynamics Model of a Flying Wing Configuration
    Master thesis in Aeronautical Engineering Development of a Flight Dynamics Model of a Flying Wing Configuration Candidate Supervisor Jacopo Tonti Prof. Guido De Matteis External supervisor Prof. Arthur Rizzi (Kungliga Tekniska högskolan) Academic Year 2013/2014 cbn 2014 by Jacopo Tonti Some rights reserved. This thesis is available under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-3.0 IT License. (creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/it/) Alla mia musa , a Vale «As ailerons, these damn spoilers make great rudders!» Bruce Miller, after flying the Marske Pioneer 1A Abstract The subject of UCAV design is an important topic nowadays and many countries have their own programmes. An international group, under the initiative of the NATO RTO AVT-201 Task group, titled “Extended Assessment of Reliable Stability & Control Pre- diction Methods for NATO Air Vehicles”, is currently performing intensive analysis on a generic UCAV configuration, named SACCON. In this thesis the stability and control characteristics of the SACCON are investigated, with the purpose of carrying out a compre- hensive assessment of the flying qualities of the design. The study included the generation of the complete aerodynamic database of the aircraft, on the basis of the experimental data measured during TN2514 and TN2540 campaigns at DNW-NWB low speed wind tunnel. Moreover, system identification techniques were adopted for the extraction of dynamic derivatives from the time histories of forced oscillation runs. The trim of the aircraft was evaluated across the points of a reasonable test envelope, so as to define a set of plausible operative conditions, representing the reference conditions for subsequent linearization of the dynamic model.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Long-Range, Hydrogen-Powered Transport Aircraft
    Design of a Long Range Hydrogen Powered Transport A project present to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering By Matthew J. Smith May, 2016 approved by Dr. Nikos Mourtos Faculty Advisor © 2016 Matthew J. Smith ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Project Advisor(s) Approves the Thesis Titled DESIGN OF A LONG RANGE HYDROGEN POWERED TRANSPORT by Matthew J. Smith APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY May 2016 Dr. N. Mourtos Department of Aerospace Engineering Advisor ABSTRACT DESIGN OF A LONG RANGE HYDROGEN POWERED TRANSPORT by Matthew J. Smith Growing concerns over pollution and the rising costs of jet fuel has charged aviation companies to research into alternative fuels. Liquid hydrogen (LH2) is a promising alternative which is highly favorable due to its high specific energy content which makes it three times lighter than current jet fuels (Jet-A). In addition, LH2’s combustion with air produces water (H2O) and negligible amounts of harmful pollutants when compared with Jet-A. The major issue in adapting liquid hydrogen as a jet fuel would be its low energy density, requiring engineers to accommodate a fuel volume that is four times larger than Jet-A counterparts. In an effort to reduce the fuel volume, an unconventional blended wing body (BWB) configuration was selected for its large internal volume and high aerodynamic efficiency. Although BWB have several desirable qualities, there are significant drawbacks. BWB’s have low maximum lift coefficients and difficulty in maintaining stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 18
    Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 18 Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II is an American single-seat, twin-engine, straight-wing jet aircraft A-10 Thunderbolt II developed by Fairchild-Republic in the early 1970s. The A- 10 was designed for a United States Air Force requirement to provide close air support (CAS) for ground forces by attacking tanks, armored vehicles, and other ground targets with a limited air interdiction capability. It is the first U.S. Air Force aircraft designed solely for close air support. The A-10 was designed around the GAU-8 Avenger, a heavy rotary cannon which forms the aircraft's primary armament (and is, to date, the heaviest rotary cannon ever mounted on an aircraft). The aircraft's hull incorporates over 1,200 An A-10 from the 81st Fighter Squadron, pounds (540 kg) of armor and was designed with Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany survivability as a priority, with protective measures in place Role Fixed-wing close air support, which enable the aircraft to continue flying even after taking forward air control, and ground- significant damage. attack aircraft The A-10's official name comes from the Republic P-47 Manufacturer Fairchild Republic Thunderbolt of World War II, a fighter that was particularly effective at close air support. The A-10 is more commonly First flight 10 May 1972 known by its nickname "Warthog" or simply "Hog". As a Introduction March 1977 secondary mission, it provides airborne forward air control, Status In service guiding other aircraft against ground targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Combat Aircraft (1945 – 2010)
    I MODERN COMBAT AIRCRAFT (1945 – 2010) Modern Combat Aircraft (1945-2010) is a brief overview of the most famous military aircraft developed by the end of World War II until now. Fixed-wing airplanes and helicopters are presented by the role fulfilled, by the nation of origin (manufacturer), and year of first flight. For each aircraft is available a photo, a brief introduction, and information about its development, design and operational life. The work is made using English Wikipedia, but also other Web sites. FIGHTER-MULTIROLE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. No. Aircraft 1° fly Pg. Lockheed General Dynamics 001 1944 3 011 1964 27 P-80 Shooting Star F-111 Aardvark Republic Grumman 002 1946 5 012 1970 29 F-84 Thunderjet F-14 Tomcat North American Northrop 003 1947 7 013 1972 33 F-86 Sabre F-5E/F Tiger II North American McDonnell Douglas 004 1953 9 014 1972 35 F-100 Super Sabre F-15 Eagle Convair General Dynamics 005 1953 11 015 1974 39 F-102 Delta Dagger F-16 Fighting Falcon Lockheed McDonnell Douglas 006 1954 13 016 1978 43 F-104 Starfighter F/A-18 Hornet Republic Boeing 007 1955 17 017 1995 45 F-105 Thunderchief F/A-18E/F Super Hornet Vought Lockheed Martin 008 1955 19 018 1997 47 F-8 Crusader F-22 Raptor Convair Lockheed Martin 009 1956 21 019 2006 51 F-106 Delta Dart F-35 Lightning II McDonnell Douglas 010 1958 23 F-4 Phantom II SOVIET UNION SOVIET UNION No.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    IN OUR AS WE ENTER OUR 70TH YEAR, OUR FOCUS IS SQUARELY ON THE FUTURE. In 1945, Charles Kaman, a self-described “headstrong 2014 twenty-six year old,” founded Kaman Aircraft Corporation KAMAN CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2014 REPORT ANNUAL KAMAN CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT, in the garage of his mother’s West Hartford, Connecticut home. His goal: demonstrate a new rotor concept he devised to make helicopters more stable and easier to fly. WE CELEBRATE Within two years the K-125 helicopter was in the air. 70 YEARS OF BREAKTHROUGHS. Bloomfield, Connecticut BUILDING A (860) 243–7100 www.kaman.com 14Seventy years later, our founder’s2015 spirit of invention and 2015FUTURE 20 determination continue to inspire everyone at Kaman. Pushing beyond the expected to create and deliver THROUGH something new and better for our customers is a driving force behind our continued momentum. INNOVATION. KAMAN CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2014 282102_CS_NARR_R3.indd 1 2/19/15 1:43 PM IN OUR 2014 KAMAN CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2014 REPORT ANNUAL KAMAN CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT, WE CELEBRATE 70 YEARS OF BREAKTHROUGHS. Bloomfield, Connecticut BUILDING A (860) 243–7100 www.kaman.com 2015194 FUTURE 20 THROUGH INNOVATION. KAMAN CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2014 AS WE ENTER OUR 70TH YEAR, OUR FOCUS IS SQUARELY ON THE FUTURE. In 1945, Charles Kaman, a self-described “headstrong twenty-six year old,” founded Kaman Aircraft Corporation in the garage of his mother’s West Hartford, Connecticut home. His goal: demonstrate a new rotor concept he devised to make helicopters more stable and easier to fly. Within two years the K-125 helicopter was in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Flight for Pilots (Aerospace Series (PEP))
    P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: SPH FM BLBK308/Swatton August 14, 2010 12:54 Printer Name: Yet to Come P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: SPH FM BLBK308/Swatton August 14, 2010 12:54 Printer Name: Yet to Come The Principles of Flight for Pilots P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: SPH FM BLBK308/Swatton August 14, 2010 12:54 Printer Name: Yet to Come Aerospace Series List Cooperative Path Planning of Unmanned Aerial Tsourdos et al November 2010 Vehicles Principles of Flight for Pilots Swatton October 2010 Air Travel and Health: A Systems Perspective Seabridge et al September 2010 Design and Analysis of Composite Structures: Kassapoglou September 2010 With Applications to Aerospace Structures Unmanned Aircraft Systems: UAVS Design, Austin April 2010 Development and Deployment Introduction to Antenna Placement & Macnamara April 2010 Installations Principles of Flight Simulation Allerton October 2009 Aircraft Fuel Systems Langton et al May 2009 The Global Airline Industry Belobaba April 2009 Computational Modelling and Simulation of Diston April 2009 Aircraft and the Environment: Volume 1 – Platform Kinematics and Synthetic Environment Handbook of Space Technology Ley, Wittmann Hallmann April 2009 Aircraft Performance Theory and Practice for Swatton August 2008 Pilots Surrogate Modelling in Engineering Design: A Forrester, Sobester, Keane August 2008 Practical Guide Aircraft Systems, 3rd Edition Moir & Seabridge March 2008 Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity And Wright & Cooper December 2007 Loads Stability and Control of Aircraft Systems Langton September 2006 Military Avionics Systems Moir & Seabridge February 2006 Design and Development of Aircraft Systems Moir & Seabridge June 2004 Aircraft Loading and Structural Layout Howe May 2004 Aircraft Display Systems Jukes December 2003 Civil Avionics Systems Moir & Seabridge December 2002 P1: FCG/SPH P2: FCG/SPH QC: FCG/SPH T1: SPH FM BLBK308/Swatton August 14, 2010 12:54 Printer Name: Yet to Come The Principles of Flight for Pilots P.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Expanding Developing Integrating Strengthening a 21St
    Kaman Aerospace serves customers around the world producing high quality components and providing design and engineering services. Kaman designs and builds flight-critical components, structures and systems including proprietary aircraft bearings, complex metallic and composite structures for commercial and military aircraft, and missile and bomb fuzing systems for the U.S. and allied militaries. Kaman Corporation Annual Report 2013 Highlights of 2013: -Revenues increased 5.7% to $614.0 million -Operating income rose 15.1% to $102.6 million Building a 21st Century infrastructure. -Operating margins rose to 16.7% in 2013, up from 15.3% in 2012 -New programs were added and backlog grew to over $600 million Expanding customer relationships. Developing talented leaders. Bloomfield, Connecticut Kaman Distribution Integrating recent acquisitions. is one of the nation’s leading industrial distributors, offering a wide variety of (860) 243–7100 products and related services in three categories; bearings and mechanical www.kaman.com Strengthening our company for the future. power transmission; fluid power; and automation, control and energy. Highlights of 2013: -Revenues increased 5.5% to $1.07 billion -We expanded our Parker relationship by acquiring Western Fluid Components, Inc., and Northwest Hose and Fittings, Inc. -We acquired Ohio Gear & Transmission -We began our national distribution agreement with Schneider Electric, a global specialist in energy management Moving forward. In 2013, Kaman continued to move forward on several fronts, from expanding customer relationships to building a stronger infrastructure that provides the foundation for a larger, more global company. We continued to invest in the future of our company by investing in our people – the next generation of Kaman leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • A-10 Warthog
    KIT5521 85552100200 A-10 WARTHOG During the war in Vietnam, the Air Force discovered that its twin tails shot away and the two turbofan engines are mounted fighter-bombers were not very good at providing close air support high above the tail to protect them from anti-aircraft artillery. The (CAS) to troops on the ground. What was needed was an aircraft tail surfaces also shield the engines from heat seeking mis- like the attack types used by the U.S. Navy, and to fill this need, the siles. During Operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom, A-10s Air Force first acquired surplus Navy A-1 Skyraiders. Next, the Air were very successful at destroying hundreds of tanks and other Force developed its own version on the Navy’s proven A-7 Corsair armored vehicles belonging to the Republican Guard and other II, but the Air Force wanted a dedicated attack and close air sup- units of the Iraqi Army. Quite often Warthogs returned safely to port aircraft of its own design. This led to the development of the their base with extensive battle damage that would have downed A-10 Thunderbolt II, which, because of its ungainly looks, became other aircraft. Your Revell kit of the A-10 comes with two sets of commonly known as the Warthog. Designed around a seven-bar- markings in different paint schemes. One is from the 104th Tactical rel, 30-mm cannon, which fires depleted Uranium rounds capable Fighter Squadron on the 175th Tactical Fighter Group which is part of piercing a considerable thickness of armor, the Warthog quickly of the Maryland Air National Guard.
    [Show full text]