January 24, 2018 Prime Minister Sheikh
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
26Th March 2021 Golden Jubilee of Independence Bangladesh
6 BANGLADESH FRIDAY-SUNDAY, MARCH 26-28, 2021 26th March 2021 Golden Jubilee of Independence Bangladesh Our constitution was made on the basis of the spirit of the liberation war under his direction within just 10 months. In just three and a half years, he took war-torn Bangladesh to the list of least developed country. While Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib was advancing to build an exploitation-deprivation-free non-communal democratic 'Sonar Bangla' overcoming all obstacles, the anti-liberation forces brutally killed him along with most of his family members on 15 August 1975. After the assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib, the development and progress of Bangladesh came to a halt. The politics of killing, coup and conspiracy started in our beloved motherland. The assassins and their accomplices promulgated the 'Indemnity Ordinance' to block the trial of this heinous murder in the history. Getting the public mandate in 1996, Bangladesh Awami League formed the government after long 21 years. After assuming the office, we took the initiatives to establish H.E. Mr. Md. Abdul Hamid H.E. Sheikh Hasina Bangladesh as a self-respectful in the comity of Hon’ble President of Hon’ble Prime Minister of nations. Through the introduction of social Bangladesh Bangladesh safety-net programs, poor and marginalized people are brought under government allowances. We made the country self-sufficient Today is 26th March, our Independence and Today is the 26th March- our great in food production with special emphasis on National Day. This year we are celebrating the Independence Day. Bangladesh completes 50 agricultural production. The Ganges Water Sharing Treaty was signed with India in 1996. -
SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE the COLONIAL CONTEXT: the BIRTH of BANGLADESH in Retrospectt
SELF-DETERMINATION OUTSIDE THE COLONIAL CONTEXT: THE BIRTH OF BANGLADESH IN RETROSPECTt By VedP. Nanda* I. INTRODUCTION In the aftermath of the Indo-Pakistan War in December 1971, the independent nation-state of Bangladesh was born.' Within the next four months, more than fifty countries had formally recognized the new nation.2 As India's military intervention was primarily responsible for the success of the secessionist movement in what was then known as East Pakistan, and for the creation of a new political entity on the inter- national scene,3 many serious questions stemming from this historic event remain unresolved for the international lawyer. For example: (1) What is the continuing validity of Article 2 (4) of the United Nations Charter?4 (2) What is the current status of the doctrine of humanita- rian intervention in international law?5 (3) What action could the United Nations have taken to avert the Bangladesh crisis?6 (4) What measures are necessary to prevent such tragic occurrences in the fu- ture?7 and (5) What relationship exists between the principle of self- "- This paper is an adapted version of a chapter that will appear in Y. ALEXANDER & R. FRIEDLANDER, SELF-DETERMINATION (1979). * Professor of Law and Director of the International Legal Studies Program, Univer- sity of Denver Law Center. 1. See generally BANGLADESH: CRISIS AND CONSEQUENCES (New Delhi: Deen Dayal Research Institute 1972); D. MANKEKAR, PAKISTAN CUT TO SIZE (1972); PAKISTAN POLITI- CAL SYSTEM IN CRISIS: EMERGENCE OF BANGLADESH (S. Varma & V. Narain eds. 1972). 2. Ebb Tide, THE ECONOMIST, April 8, 1972, at 47. -
Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali Language
Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: BGD30821 Country: Bangladesh Date: 8 November 2006 Keywords: Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali language This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? 3. Is the Awami League traditionally supported by the Hindus in Bangladesh? 4. Are Hindu supporters of the Awami League discriminated against and if so, by whom? 5. Are there parts of Bangladesh where Hindus enjoy more safety? 6. Is Bengali the language of Bangladeshis? RESPONSE 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? Hindus constitute approximately 10 percent of the population in Bangladesh making them a religious minority. Sunni Muslims constitute around 88 percent of the population and Buddhists and Christians make up the remainder of the religious minorities. The Hindu minority in Bangladesh has progressively diminished since partition in 1947 from approximately 25 percent of the population to its current 10 percent (US Department of State 2006, International Religious Freedom Report for 2006 – Bangladesh, 15 September – Attachment 1). 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? In general, minorities in Bangladesh have been consistently mistreated by the government and Islamist extremists. Specific discrimination against the Hindu minority intensified immediately following the 2001 national elections when the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) gained victory with its four-party coalition government, including two Islamic parties. -
Predators 2021 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 PREDATORS 2021 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Azerbaijan 167/180* Eritrea 180/180* Isaias AFWERKI Ilham Aliyev Born 2 February 1946 Born 24 December 1961 > President of the Republic of Eritrea > President of the Republic of Azerbaijan since 19 May 1993 since 2003 > Predator since 18 September 2001, the day he suddenly eliminated > Predator since taking office, but especially since 2014 his political rivals, closed all privately-owned media and jailed outspoken PREDATORY METHOD: Subservient judicial system journalists Azerbaijan’s subservient judicial system convicts journalists on absurd, spurious PREDATORY METHOD: Paranoid totalitarianism charges that are sometimes very serious, while the security services never The least attempt to question or challenge the regime is regarded as a threat to rush to investigate physical attacks on journalists and sometimes protect their “national security.” There are no more privately-owned media, only state media assailants, even when they have committed appalling crimes. Under President with Stalinist editorial policies. Journalists are regarded as enemies. Some have Aliyev, news sites can be legally blocked if they pose a “danger to the state died in prison, others have been imprisoned for the past 20 years in the most or society.” Censorship was stepped up during the war with neighbouring appalling conditions, without access to their family or a lawyer. According to Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh and the government routinely refuses to give the information RSF has been getting for the past two decades, journalists accreditation to foreign journalists. -
Bangladesh Beckons 2020
CONTENTS 1 Message from Honʼble President 2 Message from Honʼble Prime Minister 3 Message from Honʼble Foreign Minister 4 Message from Honʼble State Minister for Foreign Affairs 5 A Few Words from the High Commissioner 8 Bangabandhu in Timeline 12 Bangabandhu: The Making of a Great Leader 15 Bangabandhu: A Poet of Politics 18 The Greatest Speech of the Greatest Bangali 21 The Political Philosophy of Bangabandhu 25 Bangabandhu's Thoughts on Economic Development 28 Foreign Policy in Bangabandhu's Time 31 People-centric Education Policy of Bangabandhu Chief Editor Photos His Excellency External Publicity Wing, 34 Bangabandhu, Who Set the Tone of Md. Mustafizur Rahman Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agricultural Revolution Dhaka Official website of Mujib Executive Editor Borsho Celebration Bangabandhu and his Policy of Health for All Committee 37 Md. Toufiq-ur-Rahman (https://mujib100.gov.bd/) Collections from Public 41 Bangabandhu: What the World Needs to Know Editorial Team Domain A.K.M. Azam Chowdhury Learnings from Bangabandhu's Writings Mohammad Ataur Rahman Portraits 45 Sabbir Ahmed Shahabuddin Ahmed Md. Rafiqul Islam Ahmed Shamsuddoha 47 What Lessons We Can Learn from Morioum Begum Shorna Moniruzzaman Monir Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Shahjahan Ahmed Bikash Cover Photo Kamaluddin Painting of Ahmed Samiran Chowdhury 50 Bangabandhu and Nelson Mandela: Samsuddoha Drawing a Parallel Courtesy of Hamid Group Design and Printing Kaleido Pte Ltd 53 Lee Kuan Yew and Sheikh Mujib: Article Sources 63 Ubi Avenue 1, #06-08B 63@Ubi, Singapore 408937 Titans of Tumultuous Times Collections from Public Domain M: 9025 7929 T: 6741 2966 www.kaleidomarketing.com Write ups by the High 55 Bangabandhu in the Eyes of World Leaders Commission 57 Tributes to Bangabandhu in Pictures Property of the High Commission of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh #04-00/ #10-00, Jit Poh Building, 19 Keppel Road, 58 Bangabandhu Corner in Pictures Singapore 089058, Tel. -
AATA 3541 (14 March 2016)
5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ 1418185 (Refugee) [2016] AATA 3541 (14 March 2016) DECISION RECORD DIVISION: Migration & Refugee Division CASE NUMBER: 1418185 COUNTRY OF REFERENCE: Bangladesh MEMBER: Tania Flood DATE: 14 March 2016 PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney DECISION: The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Protection visa. Statement made on 14 March 2016 at 9:38am Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision pursuant to section 431 of the Migration Act 1958 and replaced with generic information which does not allow the identification of an applicant, or their relative or other dependant. 4GVTKGXGFHTQO#WUV.++QP,WN[CV 8GTKH[XGTUKQP 5KIPGFD[#WUV.++ STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Protection visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). 2. The applicant, who claims to be a citizen of Bangladesh, applied for the visa [in] September 2013 and the delegate refused to grant the visa [in] October 2014. 3. The applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 2 March 2016 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Bengali and English languages. 4. The applicant was represented in relation to the review by his registered migration agent. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE 5. The criteria for a protection visa are set out in s.36 of the Act and Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). -
Dr Md Jahid Hossain Bhuiyan Contested Secularism in Bangladesh MPIL Agora 21 July 2021, 15:00 H-16:00 H, Via Zoom
Dr Md Jahid Hossain Bhuiyan Contested Secularism in Bangladesh MPIL Agora 21 July 2021, 15:00 h-16:00 h, via Zoom There are different ways in which scholars comprehend secularism. According to some, secularism means that religion is fully separated from the state and plays no part in the public domain. Others are of the view that, while secularism denotes in principle the separation between religion and state, there should be some involvement of religion in the public domain, because it is a vital part of the lives of individuals. This article aims to present the various interpretations of secularism, create a classification of secular- ism models and examine how secularism is considered in Bangladesh. For this purpose, it analyses statements given by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (known as the Father of the Nation and the leader of Bangladesh Awami League) in support of the secularist model. Sheikh Mujib and his political party did not explicitly use the word “secularism” until the War of Independence in 1971. However, secularist ideals were emphasised by the party and secularism was included in the Constitu- tion of Bangladesh of 1972. In Bangladesh, secularism is understood as the antithesis of communal- ism. Anti-communalism does not refer to anti-religion; rather, it eliminates the conflict between the various sub-national communities and describes politics by giving equal status to individuals in a uni- fied national community. President Ziaur Rahman removed the secularism principle from the Constitu- tion in 1977 (5th Amendment). Islam was then declared as the state religion in 1988 during the rule of President Hussain Muhammad Ershad (8th Amendment). -
Emerging India? - Google Docs
1/11/2019 Reemerging India? - Google Docs Centre for Public Policy Research Independent. In-depth. Insightful (Re)Emerging India? Article by Gazi Hassan Image courtesy AP With the forces of globalisation blurring the lines between sovereignty and interdependence, the world is at a point where bilateralism and multilateralism have become the need of the hour. In the international system, there exists a dynamic relationship between the nations, where traditional enemies can become allies and allies can turn hostile to each other. The region of South Asia is emerging as a pivot for changing international politics in a significant manner. India being the largest country both in terms of area and population in the region has to sustain its dominance by exerting soft power to wean away the rising popularity of China. The Chinese influence has been on the rise and in order to cope with it, India has to carefully frame its policy to protect its national interests in the South Asian region. The political developments in various countries of the region highlighted below and India’s response to them will make grounds for robustness in policy making. 1 Centre for Strategic Studies https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gs3u3vWbRROOxjAOSxQvLzMjPpRca_iR1Ps3r-rlsHI/edit# 1/5 1/11/2019 Reemerging India? - Google Docs Centre for Public Policy Research Independent. In-depth. Insightful Sri Lanka After several months of political drama, normalcy has returned to Sri Lanka. Political crisis broke out in the country in October 2018, when the sitting President Maithripala Sirisena dissolved the Parliament and dismissed his Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe on account of allegedly plotting to assassinate him and undermining national interests. -
Building Lasting Peace: Issues of the Implementation of the Chittagong Hill Tracts Accord
Building Lasting Peace: Issues of the Implementation of the Chittagong Hill Tracts Accord Bushra Hasina Chowdhury Department of International Relations University of Dhaka, Bangladesh Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign August 2002 CONTENTS About the Author v Introduction 1 Part One The Geophysical and Demographic Setting 3 Geography of the Chittagong Hill Tracts 3 The Population of the Chittagong Hill Tracts 3 Part Two The History of the Conflict 5 British Period 5 Pakistan Period 6 Bangladesh Period 6 Part Three Political Responses of the Governments of Bangladesh (1972-2001) 7 Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (1972-1975) 7 Ziaur Rahman (1975-1981) 7 Justice Abdus Sattar (May 1981-March 1982) 8 Hussain Muhammad Ershad (1982-1990) 8 Khaleda Zia (1991-1996) 9 Sheikh Hasina (May 1996-2001) 9 Part Four Provisions of the CHT Accord of 1997 and Their Implementation Status 11 General 11 Hill District Local Government Council/Hill District Councils 12 Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council 18 Rehabilitation, General Amnesty, and Other Matters 21 Part Five The Process of Implementation of the Accord: Built-in Weaknesses 27 Part Six Recent Trends: Some Tentative Hypotheses 29 Part Seven Recommendations 31 Part Eight Concluding Remarks: In Search of Lasting Peace 33 iii ABOUT THE AUTHOR Bushra Hasina Chowdhury received her Masters in Social Science in International Relations from Dhaka University in 1996. She has been a lecturer there in the Department of International Relations since 1999. She has worked in Bangladesh on urban micro credit at the Shakti Foundation for Disadvantaged Women and worked on a country report assessment project on child disabilities in Bangladesh with UNICEF. -
A Critical Analysis of Political Ideology of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman by Atiqur Rahman Mujahid
DEBATING NATIONALISM IN BANGLADESH: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL IDEOLOGY OF SHEIKH MUJIBUR RAHMAN BY ATIQUR RAHMAN MUJAHID A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Human Sciences in History and Civilization Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Science International Islamic University Malaysia NOVEMBER 2018 ABSTRACT Sheikh Mujibur Rahman has been the central role player in the movement of Bangladeshi independence. His dominant role and presence has earned him the title “Father of the nation.” However, his political ideology has been debated intensely. Sheikh Mujib being the most towering figure in Bangladeshi politics, has been explained, claimed and counter claimed by political parties and intellectuals as a secular, a Bengali and a socialist or a mix of all. This thesis argues that such understanding about Sheikh Mujib is only partial, and is conditioned by two factors: firstly, looking at only half of Sheikh Mujib’s entire political career, that is post-1947 Sheikh Mujib in Pakistan politics; and secondly, looking at Sheikh Mujib in the context of independence movement alone as an anti-Pakistan politician. The thesis argues that the true political ideology of Sheikh Mujib should be constructed based on the context of nationalism-debate, political psychology and political trend that he inherited, oriented with and practiced in his entire political career spanning during the last two decades of British India and the first two decades of united Pakistan. In analyzing his entire political career the research found that Sheikh Mujib and his political ideology are embodiment of the spirit of independence and Muslim identity consciousness inherited from Wahhabi-Farayezi-Deobandi anti-British Islamic movements, modernist Aligarh movement, Muslim League and Pakistan movement. -
Bangladesh: Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” Seek Recognition, Respect and Rights Bangladesh: Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” Seek Recognition, Respect and Rights
BANGLADESH: URDU-SPEAKING “BIHARIS” SEEK RECOGNITION, RESPECT AND RIGHTS BANGLADESH: URDU-SPEAKING “BIHARIS” SEEK RECOGNITION, RESPECT AND RIGHTS International Republican Institute IRI.org @IRIglobal © 2020 All Rights Reserved Bangladesh: Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” Seek Recognition, Respect and Rights Copyright © 2020 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attn: Department of External Affairs International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Cover Image Description: Aerial view of the Biharis Relief Camp, known as the “Geneva Camp.” IRI | BANGLADESH • Urdu-Speaking “Biharis” 3 OVERVIEW In early 2020, the International Republican Institute (IRI) conducted a qualitative research study of the Bihari community in Bangladesh — an Urdu-speaking linguistic minority group in the South Asian nation. The study examined the challenges and needs of Biharis in different locations around Bangladesh. The term “Bihari” refers to approximately 300,000 non-Bengali, Urdu-speaking citizens of Bangladesh who came to what was then East Pakistan mostly from the Indian states of Bihar and West Bengal after the Partition of India in 1947. -
Business As Usual Is Not an Option Supply Chains and Sourcing After Rana Plaza
Business as Usual is Not an Option Supply Chains and Sourcing after Rana Plaza Sarah Labowitz and Dorothée Baumann-Pauly April 2014 About the Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University Stern School of Business “At NYU Stern, we develop people and ideas that transform the challenges of the 21st century into opportunities to create value for business and society. Our Center for Business and Human Rights is the embodiment of that mission. By creating a safe haven for open dialogue and convening relevant voices for discussion around practical solutions to some of the world’s most pressing problems, the Center, and by extension this report, demonstrate that profit and principle can co-exist.” –Peter Henry, Dean NYU Stern School of Business Dean Henry launched the Center for Business and Human Rights in March 2013 with a strong belief in the power of business to create positive change in society. In that spirit, the Center’s mission is to challenge and empower businesses to make practical progress on human rights in their own operations. It is the first center to focus on human rights as an integral part of a business school. We start from the premise that business can and does work for the good of society. We support the goal of business to create value while emphasizing high standards for human rights performance. Each year, we take on a major project around a set of human rights challenges in a sector that is of foremost concern for companies, consumers, regulators, and investors. We use the convening platform of the NYU Stern School of Business to bring together groups of companies from different sectors and different parts of the world, along with outside stakeholders and experts.