DOCSLIB.ORG

Maritime Study LNG FSRU Krk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maritime Study LNG FSRU Krk Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka UNIVERSITY OF RIJEKA Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka Maritime study LNG FSRU Krk Rijeka, 2017 Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka Name MARITIME STUDY – LNG FSRU KRK Client: EKONERG - Energy and Environmental Protection Institute d.o.o. Koranska 5, 10000 Zagreb Hrvatska Contractor: Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka University of Rijeka Studentska 2, 51000, Rijeka Hrvatska Project Manager: Damir Zec, Ph. D. Authors: Vlado Frančić, Ph. D. Josip Orović, Ph. D. Lovro Maglić, Ph. D. Donatan Balog, Cap. Leo Giačić, Cap.. Mario Vukelić, mag. ing. Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka Table of Contents: 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 NAVIGATIONAL FEATURES OF THE NAVIGABLE AREA ..................................................................................... 4 2.1 WATERWAY ................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 ORIENTATION POINTS AND LANDMARKS ON THE WATERWAY .............................................................................. 5 2.3 NAVIGATION AND COMMUNICATION COVERAGE ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 SEA TRAFFIC .................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.5 MARITIME SAFETY ........................................................................................................................................ 17 3 METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF THE NAVIGATIONAL AREA ............................ 28 3.1 WIND........................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.2 WAVES ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 3.3 CURRENTS .................................................................................................................................................. 36 3.4 TIDES .......................................................................................................................................................... 36 3.5 VISIBILITY .................................................................................................................................................... 38 4 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SHIPS USED FOR TRANSPORT OF LNG ...... 41 4.1 BASIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LNG CARRIERS ................................................................................................. 41 4.2 LNG CARRIERS SAFETY REGULATIONS .......................................................................................................... 53 4.3 LOADING SYSTEMS ....................................................................................................................................... 55 5 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LNG TERMINALS ............................................. 57 5.1 TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES ON THE LNG FSRU TERMINAL ......................................................................... 57 5.2 TECHNICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FSRU TERMINAL IN OMIŠALJ ............................... 66 6 CONDITIONS AND WAY OF MANOEUVRING AN LNG CARRIER ....................................................................... 73 6.1 EVALUATION OF EXTERNAL FORCES AND DINAMICS OF REFERENT SHIPS .......................................................... 73 6.2 ANNOUNCEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE SHIP ............................................................................................ 80 6.3 MANOEUVRE OF BERTHING AND MOORING OF THE SHIP ................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 6.4 MANOEUVRE OF UNMOORING AND LEAVING BERTH ......................................................................................... 90 7 PLAN OF MOORING AN LNG CARRIER ................................................................................................................ 95 7.1 ACCESS TO THE SHIP .................................................................................................................................... 95 7.2 MOORING SYSTEM ...................................................................................................................................... 101 Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka 8 MEASURES OF MARITIME SAFETY OF LNG CARRIERS DURING THEIR STAY AT THE BERTH ................. 110 9 SAFETY MEASURES AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION WITH PROCEEDINGS IN CASE OF DANGER OR MARITIME ACCIDENTS................................................................................................................................... 115 9.1 ADVERSE WEATHER CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................. 116 9.2 LIQUEFIED GAS LEAKS ................................................................................................................................ 117 9.3 FIRE OR EXPLOSION ................................................................................................................................... 119 9.4 COLLISION WITH ANOTHER SHIP OR VESSEL ................................................................................................. 121 9.5 SPILLING OF A LARGE AMOUNT OF OIL, OILY WATER OR OTHER PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES INTO THE SEA ........... 122 9.6 OTHER ACCIDENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 124 10 CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................... 127 Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka 1 INTRODUCTION This study has been made on the basis of a contract between EKONERG, d.o.o. as the client and the Maritime Faculty of Rijeka University as the contractor. The subject matter is the making of a maritime study for the Krk LNG FSRU terminal within the Open procurement process for ''Services of preparation of the design and permitting documentation for the construction of the Krk LNG terminal and consulting services relating to obtaining of all necessary permits and approvals: FEED preparation and main design preparation for Krk LNG FSRU terminal and obtaining of construction permit and LNG FSRU terminal power supply system documentation.''1 The aim of this study is to propose a sea traffic and navigation solution and measures of maritime safety for the area of the future LNG FSRU terminal on the island of Krk with regard to the respective regulations, i.e. provisions of the contract. The conclusions of this study, i.e. their implementation by persons authorised to do so, shall ensure the carrying out of access, stay and departure of referent LNG carriers and other ships in the specified area in a safe way, i.e. a way in which a satisfactory level of sea and marine life safety is secured. The study is based on existing legal regulations of the Republic of Croatia and in this respect, it is based on the following assumptions: characteristics of considered ships comply with the requirements set forth by the provisions of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74), the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1973/78 (MARPOL 73/78), the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966 (LOADLINE 1966), the International Convention on Tonnage Measurements of Ships, 1969 (TONNAGE 1969), as amended, or as required by the relevant and applicable technical rules of the Croatian Register of Shipping; the FSRU meets all requirements that a ship in international navigation must meet, i.e. those that have been specified by the SOLAS Convention and other international conventions accepted within the International Maritime Organisation and ratified by the Republic of Croatia; additionally, the FSRU meets all requirements, especially those related to structural safety, prescribed by the flag state as well as technical requirements prescribed by the authorised recognised organisation (RO) and the authorised recognised security organisation (RSO); in this sense, it is presumed that the recognised organisation is a member of the IACS or the Croatian Register of Shipping; characteristics of ships used for transport of liquefied gas meet the requirements prescribed by The International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code), as amended; characteristics of ships that are not subject to international conventions and characteristics of yachts and boats comply with requirements prescribed by the authorised administration of the respective flag states; 1 Floating Storage and Regasification Unit - FSRU. In the remaining text, the standard English abbreviation for a unit used in importing LNG and its re-gasification, will be used. The term terminal, in this study, only applies to land facilities, their infrastructure and equipment. The term floating terminal is deemed as technically and legally inaccurate and will therefore not be used. Maritima studija - LNG Terminal v.15 ENG 1 Faculty of Maritime Studies in Rijeka the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Work Report
    TESTING OF MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR CORALLIGENOUS COMMUNITY 2013 FIELD REPORT CASE STUDY - CROATIA The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of UNEP/MAP-RAC/SPA. Published by: RAC/SPA Copyright: © 2015 - RAC/SPA Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. For bibliographic purposes, this volume may be cited as: RAC/SPA - UNEP/MAP, 2014. Testing of monitoring protocol for coralligenous community: 2013 Field Report. By Garrabou J., Kipson S. Ed. RAC/SPA - MedMPAnet Project, Tunis: 101 p + annexes. Cover photo credit: Ante_Zuljevic. This document has been elaborated within the framework of the Regional Project for the Development of a Mediterranean Marine and Coastal Protected Areas (MPAs) Network through the boosting of Mediterranean MPAs Creation and Management (MedMPAnet Project). The MedMPAnet Project is implemented in the framework of the UNEP/MAP-GEF MedPartnership, with the financial support of EC, AECID and FFEM. Data analysis, report preparation: Joaquim Garrabou Institut de Ciències del Mar, Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain, [email protected] Field work coordination, data collection and analysis, report preparation: Silvija Kipson University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Zoology Department, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia, [email protected] Collection of field data: Sara Kaleb Department of Life Science, University of Trieste, Via L.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    30 PART 1.: AN OVERVIEW OF THE STATE OF BIOLOGICAL AND LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY IN CROATIA Threats to biological communities in the Adriatic Anthropogenic impacts pose a constant threat to living communities in shallow coastline areas. This primarily refers to building works carried out on the coast, to backfilling and consequential mudding of some parts of the sea, to solid waste disposal and particularly to pollution by unpurified waste waters of municipal and industrial origin. These factors pose threat to living communities of supralittoral and mediolittoral zones, and especially meadows of sea flowers Posidonia oceanica and Zostera marina (Box 27) belonging to communities of the infralittoral zone. A highly intensive process of filling up the coastal sea with diverse building and earthworks wastes is adversely affecting the settlements of various algae of genus Cystoseria, including the settlements of the endemic brown alga Adriatic wrack (Fig. 46) that has almost completely disappeared from some polluted parts of the Adriatic (western coast of Istria, Split, etc.). The degradation of ecological balance of benthonic ecosystems is also a result of excessive fishing for economic and sport reasons, including the ravaging of individual divers. In the shallow sea man particularly threatens the complex communities of photophilous algae and meadows of Posidonia oceanica, while in the depths of the sea the communities of the detrital bottom are most threatened due to consequences of natural stress conditions, and the communities of the muddy bottom due to excessive trawling. The immigration (or introduction) of the tropical green algae Caulerpa in the northern Mediterranean in 1984 represents another threat to biological diversity of the Figure 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Doktorski Študijski Program Tretje Stopnje GRAJENO OKOLJE Cycle
    Univerza v Ljubljani Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo Učni načrti Doktorski študijski program tretje stopnje GRAJENO OKOLJE Course Syllabi 3th cycle doctoral study programme BUILT ENVIRONMENT 2016_5 KAZALO / TABLE OF CONTENTS Obvezni predmeti/ Obligatory courses Orodja in metode v raziskovanju grajenega okolja / Tools and Methods in Research of Built Environment ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Prostorsko načrtovalsko raziskovanje / Spatial Planning Research ...................................................... 10 Raziskovanje v geodeziji / Research in Geodesy ................................................................................... 15 Izbirni predmet/Elective course Aplikativna geokemija okolja / Applied Environmental Geochemistry ................................................. 18 Bioklimatsko načrtovanje / Bioclimatic Design ..................................................................................... 21 Biotski odgovor na globalne paleoekološke spremembe / Biotic Response to Global Paleoecological Change ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Deformacijska analiza naravnega in grajenega okolja / Deformation Analysis of Natural and Built Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 27
    [Show full text]
  • Island of Cres Croatia
    Island of Cres Croatia FRANKFURT WIEN MÜNCHEN GRAZ PRAHA ITALY UDINE LJUBLJANA BUDAPEST The island of Cres VERONA MILANO SLOVENIA ZAGREB Cres is an island where the spirit of traditional Mediterranean still ZÜRICH PARIS lives on. Due to the exceptionally preserved natural environment TRIESTE and the rich history of the island, we feel on the island as a true Mediterranean natural park. Observation of dolphins playing in RIJEKA VENEZIA the sea or griffon vultures circling over the island, panoramas CROATIA that open up to the sea and over the nearby islands and beautiful Porozina Brestova sunsets, all these are scenes that leave no one indifferent. The KRK BIH preserved archaeological heritage testifies to the historical Valbiska significance of the island from the prehistoric times and ancient POROZINA BELI CRES Greece and Rome, through the Venetian period and the Habsburg PULA Monarchy to the present day. This rich past reflects in the folklore customs and in the character of the inhabitants, as well as in the MERAG PLAVNIK exceptional culinary delicacies prepared special care. Cres of today is offering highly qualitative tourist services, CRES appreciated by numerous guests who keep returning to the island VALUN ORLEC again and again. The island of Cres, the largest Croatian island (405.7 square km), ZADAR LUBENICE is for its geographical location considered as a gateway to the Adriatic, and is easily accessible from all parts of Europe through a good international road network. The island lies in the Bay of MARTINŠĆICA SPLIT Kvarner, near the eastern coast of Istria to which it is connected OSOR by the ferry line Brestova (Istra) - Porozina (Cres).
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunistic Diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic)
    University of Sopron Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Ph.D. thesis Herpetofaunistic diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic) Tamás Tóth Sopron 2018 Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Nature Conservation Program Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Faragó Sándor Dr. Gál János Introduction In recent years the Croatian islands, especially those of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago became the focus of research of herpetologists. However, in spite of a long interest encompassing more than a hundred years, numerous gaps remain in our herpetological knowledge. For this reason, the author wished to contribute to a better understanding by performing studies outlined below. Aims The first task was to map the distribution of amphibians and reptiles inhabiting the archipelago as data were lacking for several of the smaller islands and also the fauna of the bigger islands was insufficiently known. Subsequently, the faunistic information derived from the scientific literature and field surveys conducted by the author as well as available geological and paleogeological data were compared and analysed from a zoogeographic point of view. The author wished to identify regions of the islands boasting the greatest herpetofaunal diversity by creating dot maps based on collecting localities. To answer the question which snake species and which individuals are going to be a victim of the traffic snake roadkill and literature survey were used. The author also identified where are the areas where the most snakes are hit by a vehicle on Cres. By gathering road-killed snakes and comparing their locality data with published occurrences the author seeked to identify species most vulnerable to vehicular traffic and road sections posing the greatest threat to snakes on Cres Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Hrvatski Jadranski Otoci, Otočići I Hridi
    Hrvatski jadranski otoci, otočići i hridi Sika od Mondefusta, Palagruţa Mjerenja obale istoĉnog Jadrana imaju povijest; svi autori navode prvi cjelovitiji popis otoka kontraadmirala austougarske mornarice Sobieczkog (Pula, 1911.). Glavni suvremeni izvor dugo je bio odliĉni i dosad još uvijek najsustavniji pregled za cijelu jugoslavensku obalu iz godine 1955. [1955].1 Na osnovi istraţivanja skupine autora, koji su ponovo izmjerili opsege i površine hrvatskih otoka i otoĉića većih od 0,01 km2 [2004],2 u Ministarstvu mora, prometa i infrastrukture je zatim 2007. godine objavljena opseţna nova graĊa, koju sad moramo smatrati referentnom [2007].3 No, i taj pregled je manjkav, ponajprije stoga jer je namijenjen specifiĉnom administrativnom korištenju, a ne »statistici«. Drugi problem svih novijih popisa, barem onih objavljenih, jest taj da ne navode sve najmanje otoĉiće i hridi, iako ulaze u konaĉne brojke.4 Brojka 1244, koja je sada najĉešće u optjecaju, uopće nije dokumentirana.5 Osnovni izvor za naš popis je, dakle, [2007], i u graniĉnim primjerima [2004]. U napomenama ispod tablica navedena su odstupanja od tog izvora. U sljedećem koraku pregled je dopunjen podacima iz [1955], opet s obrazloţenjima ispod crte. U trećem koraku ukljuĉeno je još nekoliko dodatnih podataka s obrazloţenjem.6 1 Ante Irić, Razvedenost obale i otoka Jugoslavije. Hidrografski institut JRM, Split, 1955. 2 T. Duplanĉić Leder, T. Ujević, M. Ĉala, Coastline lengths and areas of islands in the Croatian part of the Adriatic sea determined from the topographic maps at the scale of 1:25.000. Geoadria, 9/1, Zadar, 2004. 3 Republika Hrvatska, Ministarstvo mora, prometa i infrastrukture, Drţavni program zaštite i korištenja malih, povremeno nastanjenih i nenastanjenih otoka i okolnog mora (nacrt prijedloga), Zagreb, 30.8.2007.; objavljeno na internetskoj stranici Ministarstva.
    [Show full text]
  • MONITORING of GRIFFON VULTURE Gyps Fulvus POPULATION of KVARNER AREA in 2017
    KRATKE BILJEŠKE – SHORT NOTES LARUS Vol. 52, 2017 MONITORING OF GRIFFON VULTURE Gyps fulvus POPULATION OF KVARNER AREA IN 2017 Monitoring populacije bjeloglavog supa Gyps fulvus na području Kvarnera 2017. godine Sven Kapelj1, Marko Modrić2 1Association BIOM, Preradovićeva 34, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2Public institution Priroda, Grivica 4, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia The Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus is the only remaining vulture, among the four European species, still breeding in Croatia. Its range and numbers have de- clined drastically at the beginning of the 20th century (BWPi 2006), and the recent breeding population is restricted to four islands of the Kvarner area in northern Adriatic (Cres, Krk, Plavnik, and Prvić). Apart from these major colonies, few occasional nests have been found on the island of Pag and the cliffs of the Velebit Mountain. Its breeding population is currently classified as endangered (EN), and estimated at 100-110 breeding pairs (Tutiš et al. 2013), although some reports indicate the breeding population to be 141 pairs strong (Sušić & Radek 2013). Croatian population of the Griffon Vultures is unique in its breeding habits, as they nest on cliffs directly over the sea, which makes monitoring quite de- manding, as it requires a boat and steady weather conditions. During the breeding season of 2017 field research was conducted in order to assess the number of active breeding pairs in five different colonies in four islands of the Kvarner area (Cres, Krk, Plavnik and Prvić), as well as to assess the number of chicks hatched. First field surveys were conducted from 31st of March to 1st of April during the incubation period (Xirouchakis 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Proforma Faktura 5
    Razvrstavanje otoka u skupine (Članak 2. Zakona o otocima /Narodne novine N 34/99, 149/99, 32/02, 33/06/) „Otoci se glede demografskog stanja i gospodarske razvijenosti razvrstavaju u dvije skupine. U prvoj skupini su sljedeći otoci i otočići: – nedovoljno razvijeni i nerazvijeni: Unije, Susak, Srakane Vele, Srakane Male, Ilovik, Goli, Sv. Grgur, Premuda, Silba, Olib, Škarda, Ist, Molat, Dugi otok, Zverinac, Sestrunj, Rivanj, Rava, Iž, Ošljak, Babac, Vrgada, Prvić (šibensko otočje), Zlarin, Krapanj, Kaprije, Žirje, Veli i Mali Drvenik, Vis, Biševo, Lastovo, Mljet, Šipan, Lopud, Koločep i Lokrum; – mali, povremeno nastanjeni i nenastanjeni: otočići pred Porečom: Frižital, Perila, Reverol, Sv. Nikola, Veliki Školj; otočići pred Vrsarom: Cavata, Figarolica, Galiner, Galopun, Gusti Školj, Kuvrsada, Lakal, Lunga, Salamun, Sv. Juraj, Školjić, Tovarjež, Tuf; otočići pred Rovinjem: Banjol, Figarola, Figarolica, Gustinja, Kolona, Mala Sestrica, Maškin, Pisulj, Pulari, Sturag, Sv. Katarina, Sv. Andrija, Sv. Ivan, Vela Sestrica, Veštar; brijunski otočići: Galija, Gaz, Grunj, Kotež, Krasnica, Mali Brijun, Pusti, Obljak, Supin, Sv. Jerolim, Sv. Marko, Veli Brijun, Vrsar; otočići pred Pulom: Andrija, Fenoliga, Frašker, Fraškerić, Katarina, Uljanik, Veruda; otočići u medulinskom zaljevu: Bodulaš, Ceja, Fenera, Levan, Levanić, Pomerski školjić, Premanturski školjić, Šekovac, Trumbuja; okolni otočići otoka Cresa: Kormati, Mali Ćutin, Mali Plavnik, Veli Ćutin, Visoki, Zeča; okolni otočići otoka Krka: Galun, Košljun, Plavnik, Prvić, Sv. Marko, Školjić, Zečevo; okolni otočići otoka Lošinja: Karbarus, Koludarc, Kozjak, Male Orjule, Mali Osir, Mišnjak, Murtar, Oruda, Palacol, Samuncel, Sv. Petar, Trasorka, Vele Srakane, Male Srakane, Vele Orjule, Veli Osir, Zabodaski; otočići u Vinodolskom i Velebitskom kanalu te Novigradskom i Karinskom moru: Lisac, Mali Ražanac, Mišjak, Sv. Anton, Sv.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Evaluation Report Croatia Eurovelo 8 – Mediterranean Route
    Route Evaluation Report Croatia EuroVelo 8 – Mediterranean Route MEDCYCLETOUR Project Davorin Belamarić April 27th 2018 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Mission of the project and report objectives ................................................................. 5 1.2 Organization ................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Brief methodological explanations ................................................................................ 8 1.3.1 Different phases of the route evaluation ................................................................ 8 1.3.2 ECS – European Certification Standard used for this evaluation ........................... 9 1.3.3 Used tools and equipment, photographs ..............................................................10 1.4 Overview of the sections .............................................................................................10 2 Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................16 2.1 Existing route infrastructure ........................................................................................16 2.1.1 Public transport ....................................................................................................19 2.2 Critical deficiencies .....................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • DRŽAVNI PROGRAM ZAŠTITE I KORIŠTENJA MALIH, POVREMENO NASTANJENIH I NENASTANJENIH OTOKA I OKOLNOG MORA Nacrt Prijedloga
    DRŽAVNI PROGRAM ZAŠTITE I KORIŠTENJA MALIH, POVREMENO NASTANJENIH I NENASTANJENIH OTOKA I OKOLNOG MORA nacrt prijedloga DRŽAVNI PROGRAM ZAŠTITE I KORIŠTENJA MALIH, POVREMENO NASTANJENIH I NENASTANJENIH OTOKA I OKOLNOG MORA I. UVOD …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 II. PREGLED, POLOŽAJ I RASPORED MPNNOO…………...…………………..…...…………….4 REVIDIRANJE LISTE MPNNOo…………………………………………….………………………………………………4 BAZA PODATAKA………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………8 KARTOGRAMSKI PRIKAZ SVIH MPNNOo…………………………………………….……………. (u prilogu) III. ZAŠTITA MPNNOO PRVOKUPOM……………..……….…………………………..………..………12 VIŠEKRITERIJSKA ANALIZA………………………….……...………………………………………………………..…13 2 NADMORSKE TVORBE MANJE OD 10.000 m …………………………..………………………………..……16 REZULTATI VIŠEKRITERIJSKE ANALIZE SA LISTOM ZA PRVOKUP PO ŽUPANIJAMA……………...………………………………………..……………………………………………………..…………17 IV. ČUVANJE I KORIŠTENJE MPNNOO…………………………………………………………………31 V. PROVEDBA……………………………………………………………………………………..…………….………………32 I. UVOD Izrada i donošenje Državnog programa zaštite i korištenja malih, povremeno nastanjenih i nenastanjenih otoka i okolnog mora proizlaze kao obveza iz posljednjih izmjena i dopuna Zakona o otocima (NN 33/06), i istodobno kao potreba za provedbu ovim izmjenama i dopunama uvedenih odredaba o zaštiti prije svega malih, povremeno nastanjenih i nenastanjenih otoka i otočića od neprimjerenog i neplanskog gospodarenja, i to zaštitom od neprimjerene prodaje nekretnina, revizijom vrednovanja prostora, ažuriranjem podataka u prostorne planove, utvrđivanjem granica pomorskog dobra i zaštitom
    [Show full text]
  • List of Islands
    - List of islands CI Name on the map 1:25000 Name on nautic map Location Latitude Longitude IOTA Note 1 Aba D. Aba V. nr. Kornat 43° 51' 55,6'' N 15° 12' 48,9'' E EU-170 2 Arkanđel Arkanđel nr. Drvenik Mali 43° 28' 20,5'' N 16° 01' 41,0'' E EU-016 3 Arta M. Arta M. nr. Murter 43° 51' 12,2'' N 15° 33' 41,2'' E EU-170 4 Arta V. Arta V. nr. Murter 43° 51' 21,0'' N 15° 32' 40,1'' E EU-170 5 Babac Babac nr. Pašman 43° 57' 21,6'' N 15° 24' 11,6'' E EU-170 6 Badija Badija nr. Korčula 42° 57' 14,3'' N 17° 09' 39,4'' E EU-016 7 Biševo Biševo nr. Vis 42° 58' 44,0'' N 16° 01' 00,0'' E EU-016 8 Bodulaš Bodulaš Medulin gulf 44° 47' 28,1'' N 13° 56' 53,8'' E Not 9 Borovnik Borovnik nr. Kornat 43° 48' 39,7'' N 15° 15' 12,8'' E EU-170 10 O. Brač Brač 43° 20' 00,0'' N 16° 40' 00,0'' E EU-016 11 Ceja Ceja Medulin gulf 44° 47' 05,6'' N 13° 56' 00,0'' E Not 12 O. Cres Cres 44° 51' 21,4'' N 14° 24' 29,6'' E EU-136 13 O. Čiovo Čiovo nr. Split 43° 30' 00,0'' N 16° 18' 00,0'' E Not 14 Dolfin Dolfin nr. Pag 44° 41' 29,6'' N 14° 41' 28,1'' E EU-170 15 Dolin Dolin nr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Krk Diocese
    THE KRK DIOCESE THE ISLES SHALL WAIT FOR HIS TEACHINGS O I R E T S I IN M T I E N IO ORAT FOREWORD The centuries-long presence of Christianity on the islands of the Krk Diocese is deeply rooted in the life and culture of its population, which has been subject to a succession of various social orders during the course of history. Until the year 1828, there were three dioceses within this territory: Krk, Osor and Rab. The presence of a bishop and his relationship with the people had a strong impact upon spiritual formation and identity. The pas- tors of the small dioceses of the Kvarner Islands demonstrated magna- nimity and openness of spirit toward the beautiful and modern, while at the same time listening to the “pulse” of the people, incorporating their language in worship. The beauty of handwritten and illuminated Glagolitic missals, psalters and antiphonals greatly enriched the corpus of liturgical literature traditionally written in Latin. Christian culture, both spiritual and material, is reflected here in the arts of painting, architecture, literature, poetry and music. This is a Church distinguished by its priests and religious, especially the Benedictines and Franciscans, including those with the reputation of saintliness, who have played exceptional historical roles in the raising and fostering of national consciousness, enhancement of the quality of life, education in moral principles, and the creation and safeguarding of the cultural heritage. These values provided a firm foundation for assuring the survival of this nation under changing conditions, not infrequently im- posed by fire and sword.
    [Show full text]