Peripheries at the Center of a Shadow Nation: the Pivotal Role of Borderland Violence in Central American History

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peripheries at the Center of a Shadow Nation: the Pivotal Role of Borderland Violence in Central American History Peripheries at the Center of a Shadow Nation: The Pivotal Role of Borderland Violence in Central American History Robert H. Holden History Department Old Dominion University Norfolk VA 23529-0091 [email protected] For the panel “American Identities” at The Historical Society’s 2008 Conference “Migration, Diaspora, Ethnicity, & Nationalism in History” Baltimore June 7, 2008 In 1808, at the outset of their prolonged and violent divorce from the monarchy of Spain, the peoples of Hispanic America had much in common. Having shared the experience of rule by the same overlord for three centuries, the reigning beliefs, language, legal systems and political customs were practically indistinguishable, from New Spain in the north to Chile in the south. Yet the engagement of separation from Spain also entailed a second engagement of separation: that of prying themselves apart into separate national communities. In most places, that process of national dissolution simply meant turning primary or secondary-level ex-Spanish juridisdictional boundaries into national ones. Chile and Peru, for example, had been separate jurisdictions of the overarching viceroyality of Peru; Mexico was most of the viceroyalty of New Spain. But nowhere was the process of national dissolution as divisive as in the Kingdom of Guatemala, which had been a secondary jurisdiction within the viceroyalty of New Spain. That Kingdom, like other Hispanic lands, was organized into intendencias (roughly, provinces). After separating from Spain in 1821, and then from Mexico in 1823, the ex-Kingdom survived as a nominal nation ─ the República Federal de Centro América ─ for two decades. Then, about 1840, after years of almost constant civil war, the federal republic finally collapsed into five separate countries whose international borders followed the boundaries of the states (estados) into which the República had been divided. The state boundaries, in turn, had largely duplicated the intendencia boundaries of the old Kingdom. Political disintegration had not proceeded this deeply and widely anywhere else in Hispanic America. It would have been difficult to create a distinctive national identity for the kingdom-turned-republic of 1821-c. 1840. But the challenge supplied by the breakup of 1840 seemed even greater. For on what grounds was, say, Honduras to be understood as a distinct political community with its own identity, bursting to be free from the national communities of Nicaragua or Guatemala? Elsewhere I have suggested that it was just the legacy of the failed República Federal de Centro América, and the centuries-old networks of cross-national kinship, entrepreneurial, and political ties, that created the conditions for weak nationalisms and a pattern of cross-border intervention, both armed and otherwise, that have persisted to this day.1 The “shadow nation” of this paper’s title is the old República, and the “peripheries” of the title are the ex-República’s state boundaries, transformed into international boundaries after 1840. The “shadow nation” has lived on, not only in mistrust and violence, but also in ever-evolving expressions of an eternally frustrated aspiration to reunite. Between 1842 and 1961, "formal and official steps" were undertaken to reconstitute the federation at least 25 times, though not one of them survived more than a few months, and all five countries did not always join them (El Salvador and Honduras joined almost every one; Guatemala and Nicaragua were only a little less active, and Costa Rica participated in no more than a third).2 Writing in the early 1980s, during the worst period of disunity and violence in the region’s history, the distinguished historian of Central America, Hector Pérez Brignoli, observed that ever since 1821, “la utopía de la Unión se ha visto incansablemente reiterada,” and he was right to predict that the theme of unity would reemerge even after the bitterly destructive horrors of the 1980s.3 Indeed, the banner of the “utopía de la Unión” is carried today by two institutions ─ the politically-oriented Sistema de Integración Centroamericana (SICA) and (in the economic realm) the Secretariá de Integración Económica Centroamericana (SIECA), each with its own cross- 1 Robert H. Holden, Armies Without Nations: Public Violence and State Formation in Central America, 1821- 1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 42-43. 2 Thomas L. Karnes, The Failure of Union: Central America 1824-1960 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1961), 243, 248. 3 Héctor Pérez Brignoli, Breve Historia De Centroamérica (Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1985), 154. 1 regional governing bodies and bureaucracies. Morever, the very constitutions of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras still today commit their countries to restoring the old federation. These multiple expressions of a desire to reunify in turn help to preserve an ambience of ambiguity about national identity. That ambiguity, it is the purpose of this paper to demonstrate, finds expression in the opportunities for mutual subversion, resistance and innovation that are most hospitably accommodated in the borderlands that separate the five countries. Rare is the Central American borderland violence that is unambiguously nationalistic. For borders to magnify and enhance a sense of national identity, there must be a plausible premise of alterity separating the two sides. But as Pérez Brignoli insightfully observed, the persistence of the unity question means, “en cierto modo, que la identidad nacional de los países centroamericanos no está todavía plenamente constituida,”4 a problem whose bearing on the institutional character of the borderlands (and the violence associated with them) cannot be overlooked. If the agents of isthmian borderland violence typically represent no consistently distinct national identity, national-level discourses about borderland violence cannot therefore readily seize on that violence in order to rally “the nation” against “the other.” The most effective and credible myths of alterity in Central America have been those constituted by the menacing presence of some non-isthmian power ─ above all, the United States, and secondly, the Soviet Union.5 As Jorge Castañeda said of the Latin American left in general from the beginning of the twentieth century onward, “there was virtually no one else [but the United States] to be nationalistic against.”6 In 1953 and 1954, the Guatemalan enemies of the Guatemalan government of Jacobo Arbenz took refuge in the neighboring states of Nicaragua and Honduras. Installing themselves in the borderland, they pushed back into Guatemala, fortified with weapons and military training covertly arranged by the United States with the quiet cooperation of the governments of Nicaragua and Honduras. The Guatemalans, Hondurans and Nicaraguans all accused one another of being the stooges of either U.S. or Soviet imperialism. Nor did the Costa Rican-Nicaraguan borderland violence of the 1950s thrive on nationalistic principles, for it was provoked repeatedly by the borderland-based, Nicaraguan-protected, Costa Rican enemies of the Costa Rican governments. In the borderlands conflicts of the bloody 1970s and ‘80s, national identities would fade even further. Nicaraguans, Hondurans and Costa Ricans did not fight each other then as Nicaraguans, Hondurans or Costa Ricans but as sandinistas or anti-sandinistas. Only the weakest of nationalistic discourses can be found in borderland fighting because nationalities were not fundamentally in conflict. Individuals of all three nationalities (and others besides) could be found on different sides of the fighting, and on different sides of the borders. Morales’s characterization of the Nicaraguan-Costa Rican borderland as “binacional” may well apply to others in the region. Owing mainly to Nicaraguan migration, kinship ties and local loyalties have given that borderland "un principio de identidad muy homogéneo e históricamente más volcado hacia Nicaragua," a tendency reinforced by the fact that the borderland itself communicates more easily with Nicaraguan than with Costa Rican centers of decisionmaking. As a result, settlements on the Costa Rican side were more often the result of Nicaraguan rather than 4 Pérez Brignoli, Breve Historia de Centroamérica, 154. 5 For the violence-enhancing risks of such myths, see Peter Lambert, "Myth, Manipulation, and Violence: Relationships Between National Identity and Political Violence," in Political Violence and the Construction of National Identity in Latin America, ed. Will Fowler and Peter Lambert, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), 29-30. 6 Jorge G. Castañeda, Utopia Unarmed: the Latin American Left After the Cold War (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), 290-291. 2 Costa Rican colonization efforts. "Aparte, entonces, de las relaciones de parentesco y vecindad entre poblaciones fronterizas de ambos países, se conformó un tejido de rutas y redes comerciales que constituyen los principales lazos de una economía transfronteriza en procesos de expansión permanente." At the same time, this borderland has long been a scene of conflict, with fighting men passing from one side to the other, so that border life has been dominated by war and the fear of war on both sides of the line. Even trade revolved around war materiel.7 Civil war, rather than international war, may thus be the best way to understand these cross-border occasions of violence, a view that would also fit Jack Child’s interpretation of isthmian conflict as fundamentally ideological.8 In the “shadow
Recommended publications
  • Education in Costa Rica
    Education in Costa Rica HIGHLIGHTS 2017 Costa Rica WHAT ARE REVIEWS OF NATIONAL POLICIES FOR a strong focus on improving learning outcomes; equity in EDUCATION? educational opportunity; the ability to collect and use data to inform policy; the effective use of funding to steer reform; OECD Education Policy Reviews provide tailored advice and the extent of multistakeholder engagement in policy to governments to develop policies that improve the skills design and implementation. of all members of society, and ensure that those skills are used effectively, to promote inclusive growth for better jobs Based on these tough benchmarks, the review both underlines and better lives. The OECD works with countries to identify the many strengths of Costa Rica’s education system and and understand the factors behind successful reform and provides recommendations on how to improve policies and provide direct support to them in designing, adopting and practices so that the country can advance towards OECD implementing reforms in education and skills policies. standards of education attainment and outcomes. These highlights summarise the main findings of the Review: WHY A REVIEW OF EDUCATION IN COSTA RICA? l Early childhood education: Higher priority should be given higher priority in public spending and policy, given the In 2015, the OECD opened discussions for the accession of vital role it can play in tackling disadvantage and poverty. Costa Rica to the OECD Convention. As part of this process, Costa Rica has undergone in-depth reviews in all the relevant l Basic education: The quality and equity of learning areas of the Organisation’s work including a comprehensive outcomes should become the centre point of policy and review of the education system, from early childhood practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Otilio Ulate and the Traditional Response to Contemporary Political Change in Costa Rica
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1977 Otilio Ulate and the Traditional Response to Contemporary Political Change in Costa Rica. Judy Oliver Milner Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Milner, Judy Oliver, "Otilio Ulate and the Traditional Response to Contemporary Political Change in Costa Rica." (1977). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3127. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3127 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • IDENTITY and PERSUASION How Nations Remember Their Pasts and Make Their Futures
    IDENTITY AND PERSUASION How Nations Remember Their Pasts and Make Their Futures By CONSUELO CRUZ* DENTITY politics now occupies center stage. It is on explosive dis- Iplay in a wide range of settings, from Africa to the Balkans. And it is more subtly at work in the democracies of the West: NATO leaders must reexamine their own guiding principles in the face of multiple human- itarian disasters brought about by tribal, ethnic, and religious hatreds, while simultaneously dealing with increasingly heterogenous popula- tions at home and ceaseless migrant flows from east and south. It is no surprise, then, that identity should figure prominently in scholarly debates about conflict resolution, migration, citizenship, transnational alliances, democratization, nation and state building, and even globalization. Nor is it a puzzle that long-standing debates about identity should have produced the two clearly defined camps that we know as primordialists and constructivists.1 What is perplexing is the current failure to investigate systematically the complex linkages be- tween identity formation and the expressive practices of political actors. After all, we approach reality rhetorically—that is, with an intent to convince.2 This is why persuasion is the hallmark of effective leader- ship. Short of pure coercion, it is the most direct way to mobilize or paralyze a group. And this is why rhetorical power—recognized as cen- * I would like to thank Peter Hall, Jeffrey Legro, Sheri Berman, and Mehmet Tabak for their in- sightful suggestions on a previous version of this article. I am also grateful to Deborah Yashar, Anna Seleny, Paola Cesarini, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the present ver- sion.
    [Show full text]
  • La Oposición Antitrujillista, La Legión Del Caribe Y José Figueres De Costa Rica (1944-1949) 1 María Dolores Ferrero Universidad De Huelva [email protected]
    La oposición antitrujillista, la Legión del Caribe y José Figueres de Costa Rica (1944-1949) 1 María Dolores Ferrero Universidad de Huelva [email protected] Matilde Eiroa Universidad Carlos III de Madrid [email protected] Recepción: 27 de octubre de 2014 / Revisión: 19 de marzo de 2015 Aceptación: 28 de abril de 2015 / Publicación: Diciembre de 2016 Resumen En la década de 1940, los exiliados dominicanos, junto a otros centroamericanos, se unieron en la orga- nización denominada Legión del Caribe con el objetivo de apoyarse mutuamente contra las dictaduras. Acordaron comenzar la lucha contra Trujillo y Somoza, pero la coyuntura aconsejó posponer los planes iniciales y se implicaron en la guerra civil o revolución de Costa Rica de 1948. Los dominicanos Horacio Ornes y Juan Rodríguez dirigieron la activa participación en el conflicto que terminaría con la toma del poder por José Figueres (presidente de facto de 1948 a 1949), que no hubiera sido posible sin la Legión del Caribe. Sin embargo, José Figueres no asumió posteriormente su compromiso con la Legión y las reclamaciones dominicanas nunca se atendieron. Palabras clave: Legión del Caribe, dictaduras centroamericanas, José Figueres, Rafael L. Trujillo, Anastasio Somoza, Caribe, Siglo XX. The Anti-Trujillo Opposition, the Caribbean Legion and Costa Rica’s Jose Figueres (1944-1949) Abstract In the 1940’s, exiled Dominicans and other Central-Americans joined together in an organization called the Caribbean Legion, with the objective of providing mutual support in the struggle against dictator- ship. They began by agreeing to fight against Trujillo and Somoza, but circumstances favored the pos- tponement of their initial plans, and their involvement in the Civil War or Revolution of Costa Rica of 1948 instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Costa Rica's Migration Landscape”, in Interrelations Between Public Policies, Migration and Development in Costa Rica, OECD Publishing, Paris
    Interrelations between Public Policies, Migration and Development in Costa Rica © OECD/FUNDEVI 2017 Chapter 2 Costa Rica’s migration landscape Economic growth and high living standards have attracted immigrants from countries in the region, making Costa Rica a net immigration country in a region characterised by emigration. Immigrants constitute 8.8% of the population, and an even higher share of the labour force. At the same time, emigration has also been on the rise since the 1990s, with about 130 000 Costa Ricans living abroad, mainly in the United States. This chapter paints a broad picture of the Costa Rican migration landscape, drawing from the literature, censuses and surveys. It gives a brief overview of the country’s history of migration and current trends: its drivers, who the immigrants and emigrants are and where they have gone. Finally, it lays out the legal, policy and institutional framework relevant to migration. 37 2. Costa Rica’S migration Landscape Costa Rica is characterised by both immigration and emigration flows. Immigrants, mainly from neighbouring countries and particularly Nicaragua, constitute an important part of the population and workforce. Emigration from Costa Rica has also been on the rise since the late 1990s (OECD, 2016). It is estimated that more than 130 000 Costa Ricans live abroad, sending home over USD 500 million in remittances in 2015. While immigrants are mainly low-skilled, emigrants – particularly those leaving to the United States – are in general highly skilled (OECD, 2009). Research on the migration phenomenon is relatively abundant in Costa Rica. However, there are significant knowledge gaps when it comes to the overall impact of migration, both immigration and emigration.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of U.S. Military Interventions in Latin America
    Encyclopedia of U.S. Military Interventions in Latin America Alan McPherson, Editor Volume 2 M-Z Q ABC-CLIO Santa Barbara, California • Denver, Colorado • Oxford, England Contents Preface, xiii Beals, Carleton (1893-1979), 35 Introduction, .w Bidlack-Mallarino Treaty (1846), 36 Guide to Related Topics, xix Blaine, James (1830-1893), 37 Bogota Conference (1948), 39 Boland Amendments, 41 Volume 1 Bolivia, 45 Adams-Onfs Treaty (1819), 1 Borah, William (1865-1940), 47 Airplanes, Use of, 3 Brazil, 48 Allende, Salvador, Intervention against (1970-1973), 4 Brazil, Intervention in (1964), 52 Alliance for Progress, 8 British, Interventions against the, 54 Anaconda Copper Mining Bryan, William Jennings Company, 10 (1860-1925), 57 Anticommunism, 12 Bush, George H. W. (1924-), 58 Anti-Interventionism, 14 Bush, George W. (1946-), 60 Arbenz, Jacobo, Overthrow of Butler, Smedley (1881-1940), 61 (1954), 18 Caceres, Ramon (1866-1911), 65 Argentina, 22 Cacos, 66 Baltimore Affair (1891), 25 Calvo Doctrine, 68 Banana Companies, 28 Caperton, William Banks Baseball, 31 (1855-1941), 69 Bay of Pigs, Attempted Invasion of the Caracas Conference (1954), 71 (1961), 33 Caribbean Legion, 72 VI | Contents Carter, Jimmy (1924-), 74 Daniels, Josephus (1862-1948), 137 Castro, Cipriano (1858-1924), 76 De la Torriente, Cosme Castro, Fidel (1926-), 78 (1872-1956), 138 Castro, Raul (1931-), 80 Democracy, 139 Central American Conference Dewey, George (1837-1917), 141 (1907), 82 Dillingham, A. C.(1848-1925), 143 Central American Defense Council, 83 Dollar Diplomacy, 144 Central
    [Show full text]
  • Limón Patwa: a Perceptual Study to Measure Language Attitudes Toward Speakers of Patwa in Costa Rica
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Linguistics Linguistics 2019 LIMÓN PATWA: A PERCEPTUAL STUDY TO MEASURE LANGUAGE ATTITUDES TOWARD SPEAKERS OF PATWA IN COSTA RICA Robert Bell University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.352 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bell, Robert, "LIMÓN PATWA: A PERCEPTUAL STUDY TO MEASURE LANGUAGE ATTITUDES TOWARD SPEAKERS OF PATWA IN COSTA RICA" (2019). Theses and Dissertations--Linguistics. 32. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ltt_etds/32 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Linguistics at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Linguistics by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlos Castillo Armas, the United States and the 1954 Counterrevolution in Guatemala
    CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA Andres Alberto Tapia B.A., University of California, Davis, 2009 THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO FALL 2011 CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA A Thesis by Andres Alberto Tapia Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Joseph Palermo __________________________________, Second Reader Patrick Ettinger ____________________________ Date ii Student: Andres Alberto Tapia I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this thesis is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Mona Siegel Date Department of History iii Abstract of CARLOS CASTILLO ARMAS, THE UNITED STATES AND THE 1954 COUNTERREVOLUTION IN GUATEMALA by Andres Alberto Tapia Statement of Problem The 1954 overthrow of President Jacobo Arbenz Gúzman orchestrated by the United States has been approached by various points of view by different historians. While many aspects of the overthrow such as the involvement of the Central Intelligence Agency, the influence of the United Fruit Company, and the Guatemalan government’s relation to communism have all been covered, one crucial player in the overthrow, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, has not gained the same critical attention. Castillo Armas acted as the counterrevolutionary the CIA chose to lead the overthrow of Arbenz therefore understanding how he received the role and how he performed his task is important to understanding this historical moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Intelligence), “Report on Mercenary Camps and Bases in Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Florida” (Forwarded to Cuban President Osvaldo Dorticos Torrado)
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified January 12, 1961 Cuban G-2 (military intelligence), “Report on mercenary camps and bases in Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Florida” (forwarded to Cuban President Osvaldo Dorticos Torrado) Citation: “Cuban G-2 (military intelligence), “Report on mercenary camps and bases in Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Florida” (forwarded to Cuban President Osvaldo Dorticos Torrado),” January 12, 1961, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Released by Cuban Government for 22-24 March 2001 conference (“Bay of Pigs: 40 Years After”) in Havana. Translated by National Security Archive. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/115184 Summary: A military intelligence report from the Cuban G-2 service, outlining the miltiary capabilities of nearby Latin American countries, as well as the miltiary situations (uprisings) in many of those same countries. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Spanish Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document [Box] DIY. INT. G-2 MINFAR CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS APR 7 1961 RECEIVED NO. 2681 THIS REPORT IS EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE CHIEF OF REVOLUTION TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED. IT SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE DEPARTMENT CHIEF INF G-2 MINFAR [MINISTRY OF THE REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES] CONFIDENTIAL From: Dr. Tec. 0. Inf. G-2 To : Commander Ramiro Valdes Menendez Department Chief. Inf. G-2 MINFAR Dpt. Inf. G-2 MINFAR January 12, 1961 “YEAR OF EDUCATION’’ Re : Report on mercenary camps and bases in Guatemala, Nicaragua, and Florida In 1959, the “yanki” [Yankee, i.e., US] Department of State made the Dominican Republic its main mercenary training center.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL AMERICA and TEXAS, 1821-1836 By
    MEXICO’S BREAK UP: MEXICO CITY'S MISCONCEPTIONS AND MISMANAGEMENT OF ITS PERIPEHERIES: CENTRAL AMERICA AND TEXAS, 1821-1836 by KYLE CARPENTER Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON MAY 2013 Copyright © by Kyle Carpenter 2013 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I cannot thank my committee enough. Dr. Sam Haynes, the committee chair, remained unflinchingly supportive from the very beginning. He took on this project in its infant stages and allowed it to change and evolve as necessary. His support and trust in me were unbelievable. Dr. David Narrett read every draft so carefully and responded with such detailed commentary. Dr. John Garrigus kept this project alive through his advice and guidance at a critical time in its development. The entire committee was indispensable to this thesis and I cannot thank them enough. While working on this project, I relied on the support of so many people. The person who deserves the most gratitude is my wife, Mickey. She patiently supported me through all the research, all the writing, and all the editing that went into this thesis. I could not have done it without her. I also extend my thanks to everyone who helped me in the massive research campaign this thesis required. The staff at the University of Texas at Arlington Library Special Collections deserves special thanks. Additionally, I received great assistance from the staffs at the Nettie Lee Benson Library and the Bancroft Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 5-2016 Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE, and the Transnational Counter-Revolution against the Guatemalan Revolution, 1944-1952 Aaron Coy Moulton University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Latin American History Commons, and the Latin American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Moulton, Aaron Coy, "Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE, and the Transnational Counter- Revolution against the Guatemalan Revolution, 1944-1952" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 1533. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/1533 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Guatemalan Exiles, Caribbean Basin Dictators, Operation PBFORTUNE, and the Transnational Counter-Revolution against the Guatemalan Revolution, 1944-1952 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Aaron Moulton University of Arkansas Bachelor of Arts in Latin American Studies, Spanish, and Mathematics, 2007 University of Kansas Master of Arts in Latin American Studies, 2009 May 2016 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. __________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Costa Rican MUSIC
    Costa Rican MUSIC A small peek into the culture that fills the air of Costa Rica . By Trent Cronin During my time spent in the country of Costa Rica, I found a lot of PURA VIDA different sounds that catch your ear while you are in Costa Rica. After sorting This is a picture of a guy through the honking horns and barking dogs, you’ll find two types of music. I met named Jorge; he These two types of music are the traditional Latin American music and the more works at the airport in modern, or Mainstream, music that we are familiar with in the States. The Latin Heredia. He was telling American music includes some well-known instruments like the guitar, maracas, some me that music is in his veins. This is a good type of wind instrument (sometimes an ocarina) and the occasional xylophone. The example of how every music style tends to be very up beat and gives of a happy vibe, although there are Costa Rican holds some sad songs. Sometimes, in the larger, more populated, parts of the city, you can music near and dear to find one or more street performers playing this type of music. I don’t know what it is their heart. about hearing someone sing in a foreign language, but I like it. I will admit; I was a little surprised to walk passed a car and hear Beyonce’ being played. After further time spent I found out that other famous music artist like Metallica, The Beatles, Michael Jackson, and Credence Clear Water Revival (CCR) have diffused into the radio waves of Costa Rica.
    [Show full text]