DOCSLIB.ORG

Determining the Depth Limit of Bioluminescent Sources in Scattering Media

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determining the Depth Limit of Bioluminescent Sources in Scattering Media bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.21.044982; this version posted April 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Determining the Depth Limit of Bioluminescent Sources in Scattering Media. Ankit Raghuram1,*, Fan Ye1, Jesse K. Adams1,2, Nathan Shaner3, Jacob T. Robinson1,2,4,5, Ashok Veeraraghavan1,2,6 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 2 Applied Physics Program, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 3 Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 4 Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA 5 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA 6 Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston TX 77005, USA * [email protected] Abstract Bioluminescence has several potential advantages compared to fluorescence microscopy for in vivo biological imaging. Because bioluminescence does not require excitation light, imaging can be performed for extended periods of time without phototoxicity or photobleaching, and optical systems can be smaller, simpler, and lighter. Eliminating the need for excitation light may also affect how deeply one can image in scattering biological tissue, but the imaging depth limits for bioluminescence have yet to be reported. Here, we perform a theoretical study of the depth limits of bioluminescence microscopy and find that cellular resolution imaging should be possible at a depth of 5-10 mean free paths (MFPs). This limit is deeper than the depth limit for confocal microscopy and slightly lower than the imaging limit expected for two-photon microscopy under similar conditions. We also validate our predictions experimentally using tissue phantoms. Overall we show that with advancements in the brightness of bioluminescent indicators, it should be possible to achieve deep, long-term imaging in biological tissue with cellular resolution. Introduction 1 The imaging depth in biological tissue is typically limited by scattering; on average, a 2 photon scatters more than ten times within the first millimeter of most biological 3 tissues [19, 20]. This scattering results in blurring of the image and reduced image 4 contrast. Together these effects limit the maximum depth at which cellular-resolution 5 imaging is possible [19]. 6 To improve image quality within scattering tissue, researchers often perform in vivo 7 fluorescence imaging using confocal, two-photon (2P), or three-photon (3P) 8 microscopy [8, 23]. These techniques help to reduce out-of-plane fluorescence, which 9 improves image contrast, but they rely on scanning laser systems. These scanning laser 10 1/13 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.21.044982; this version posted April 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. systems are not only complex but subject the tissue to high intensities that lead to 11 photobleaching and phototoxicity, limiting the duration of an imaging 12 experiment [31, 32]. 13 Bioluminescence provides a promising alternative technique that eliminates the need 14 for excitation light, making it possible to perform imaging experiments for extended 15 periods of time with simplified, light-weight imaging systems [16,30]. Bioluminescence is 16 a form of chemiluminescence that generates light through a chemical reaction without 17 the need for excitation light. In this way, bioluminescent proteins act as sources of light 18 within the tissue, avoiding harmful side effects of excitation light like photobleaching 19 and phototoxicity [16, 30]. Additionally, light collection for bioluminescent imaging does 20 not require a light source, color filters, or dichroic mirrors allowing wide-field 21 microscopes [30, 32] or their lensless counterparts [24] to be simpler and smaller than 22 fluorescent systems. 23 A less-discussed advantage of bioluminescence is the fact it may be possible to image 24 more deeply into a scattering biological sample than is possible with 25 epifluorescence [30, 32]. Because bioluminescence does not require excitation light, 26 imaging contrast does not suffer from autofluorescence and excitation scattering, which 27 are the primary factors that limit deep fluorescent imaging in scattering media [20]. 28 While bioluminescence imaging still suffers from attenuation and blurring due to 29 emission scattering, with a bright enough source, one would expect to achieve a greater 30 imaging depth than epifluorescence [7,26, 34]. 31 In this paper, we quantitatively address the relationship between the 32 bioluminescence brightness and imaging depth in scattering media. Using a combination 33 of Monte Carlo simulation and experiments in tissue phantoms, we find the following: 34 (1) The depth limit for bioluminescent imaging ranges from 5-10 MFPs. (2) As the 35 brightness of bioluminescent reporters increases, imaging depth and spatial resolution 36 also increase. (3) With the available bright bioluminescent indicators like 37 eNanoLantern [26,34], we expect that a 2 nM concentration of reporters is needed to 38 achieve the necessary signal to image through > 5 MFPs of scattering media. 39 Fluorescence Imaging 40 Fluorophores emit light that is red-shifted compared to the light that they absorb, 41 allowing one to use color filters to isolate light that is emitted by the scene [5,23]. 42 Fluorescence can be used to image neural activity by monitoring membrane voltage or 43 2 2+ cellular Ca + concentration [13,25]. In recent years, genetically encoded Ca 44 indicators (GECIs) have shown promise as in vivo indicators of neuronal activity 45 2+ because they can respond to changes in cytosolic Ca brought about by opening and 46 2+ closing of Ca channels during an action potential and can be expressed in specific 47 neuronal populations [14]. To record neural activity from cells below the cortical 48 surface, one must image through several hundred microns into scattering brain tissue. 49 Due to excitation and emission scattering, signal originating from these deeper regions 50 profoundly diminishes. To sufficiently illuminate deeper portions of tissue in standard 51 epifluorescence microscopy, increased excitation energy is used to obtain a larger 52 emitted signal [5]. However, out-of-plane autofluorescence and excitation scattering also 53 increase and reduce contrast [30], limiting the depth limit to 3 MFPs for epifluorescence 54 imaging [20]. 55 Confocal and 2P microscopes were developed to combat these problems by reducing 56 the amount of detected background light [2, 28]. Confocal microscopy introduces a 57 pinhole at the illumination and imaging plane in order to image a single scene point at a 58 time, blocking out out-of-plane fluorescence (a combination of autofluorescence and 59 out-of-plane probe fluorescence). The scene point is scanned across the sample to create 60 the full image [28]. 2P microscopy relies on a nonlinear excitation process where 61 2/13 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.21.044982; this version posted April 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. fluorescence intensity scales as the square of intensity, making it possible to better 62 restrict fluorescence to the focus of the laser spot. Due to the extremely low probability 63 of excitation outside of the focal spot, 2P microscopy does not require a pinhole to 64 reject out-of-plane fluorescence [2]. However, these methods, along with conventional 65 fluorescence imaging, suffer from probe photobleaching and excitation light-induced 66 phototoxicity, making long term studies challenging [30,32]. Also, in the cases of 67 confocal and 2-photon microscopy, a high powered laser and complex optical systems 68 are needed to perform real-time imaging. These systems can be relatively large and are 69 particularly challenging to implement in a small form-factor design for in vivo imaging. 70 Bioluminescence: Potential and Pitfalls 71 Bioluminescence is a form of chemiluminescence that emits light from chemical reactions. 72 Bioluminescent proteins produce light via oxidation of a small-molecule luciferin by a 73 luciferase or photoprotein. Luciferases display constitutive activity, while photoproteins, 74 2+ like aequorin, produce light in a Ca -dependent manner [18]. Aequorin was first 75 isolated from jellyfish in 1962 [27], and since then, dozens of other bioluminescent 76 proteins have been cloned and engineered into more catalytically active and more 77 spectrally diverse bioluminescent sources [31]. Beyond improvements in the enzymes 78 themselves, the bioluminescence quantum yield of luciferases can be amplified through 79 F¨orsterresonance energy transfer (FRET) to a fluorescent protein. Among the first 80 demonstrations of this principle was the creation of "NanoLantern," in which Renilla 81 luciferase acts as a FRET donor to the yellow fluorescent protein Venus, resulting in a 82 large increase in emitted photons. Scientists are already using proteins like NanoLantern 83 (and variants) for tissue imaging. For example, the NanoLantern-derived calcium sensor 84 CalfluxVTN can be expressed via viral transduction, along with optogenetic actuators,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review on Bioluminescence Imaging
    DOI: 10.37421/apn.2020.05.170 Review Article Journal of Volume 12:7, 2021 Nuclear Medicine & Radiation Therapy ISSN: 2155-9619 Open Access Review on Bioluminescence Imaging Cleodora Yen* Department of Radiology, Yale University, United States Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) is an innovation created over the previous decade The strategy expects luciferin to be added to the circulatory system, which conveys it that takes into consideration the noninvasive investigation of continuous organic cycles. to cells all through the body. At the point when luciferin arrives at cells that have been As of late, bioluminescence tomography (BLT) has become conceivable and a few adjusted to convey the firefly quality, those cells produce light [2]. frameworks have opened up. In 2011, PerkinElmer gained perhaps the most famous lines of optical imaging frameworks with bioluminescence from Caliper Life Sciences. The BLT opposite issue of 3D remaking of the dispersion of bioluminescent atoms Bioluminescence is the cycle of light outflow in living life forms. Bioluminescence imaging from information estimated on the creature surface is innately poorly presented. The uses local light outflow from one of a few organic entities which bioluminesce. The three main little creature study utilizing BLT was directed by scientists at the University of principle sources are the North American firefly, the ocean pansy (and related marine Southern California, Los Angeles, USA in 2005. Following this turn of events, many organic entities), and microbes like Photorhabdus luminescens and Vibrio fischeri. The exploration bunches in USA and China have fabricated frameworks that empower BLT. DNA encoding the iridescent protein is fused into the lab creature either by means of Mustard plants have had the quality that makes fireflies' tails shine added to them so the a viral vector or by making a transgenic creature.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come?
    Microorganisms 2013, 1, 3-25; doi:10.3390/microorganisms1010003 OPEN ACCESS microorganisms ISSN 2076-2607 www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Review Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come? Martha Valiadi 1,* and Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez 2 1 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Strasse, Plӧn 24306, Germany 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +49-4522-763277; Fax: +49-4522-763310. Received: 3 May 2013; in revised form: 20 August 2013 / Accepted: 24 August 2013 / Published: 5 September 2013 Abstract: Some dinoflagellates possess the remarkable genetic, biochemical, and cellular machinery to produce bioluminescence. Bioluminescent species appear to be ubiquitous in surface waters globally and include numerous cosmopolitan and harmful taxa. Nevertheless, bioluminescence remains an enigmatic topic in biology, particularly with regard to the organisms’ lifestyle. In this paper, we review the literature on the cellular mechanisms, molecular evolution, diversity, and ecology of bioluminescence in dinoflagellates, highlighting significant discoveries of the last quarter of a century. We identify significant gaps in our knowledge and conflicting information and propose some important research questions
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Circadian and Phototransduction Pathways in the Network Controlling CAB Gene Transcription in Arabidopsis
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 15491–15496, December 1996 Plant Biology Integration of circadian and phototransduction pathways in the network controlling CAB gene transcription in Arabidopsis (firefly luciferaseyluminescence imagingycircadian rhythmygene expression) ANDREW J. MILLAR* AND STEVE A. KAY National Science Foundation Center for Biological Timing, Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903 Communicated by Winslow Briggs, Carnegie Institute of Washington, Stanford, CA, October 15, 1996 (received for review June 24, 1996) ABSTRACT The transcription of CAB genes, encoding the the circadian clock acts negatively on CAB expression, antag- chlorophyll ayb-binding proteins, is rapidly induced in dark- onizing the positive effects of phototransduction pathways grown Arabidopsis seedlings following a light pulse. The during the subjective night. transient induction is followed by several cycles of a circadian The transient induction of CAB expression immediately rhythm. Seedlings transferred to continuous light are known after plants are exposed to light is referred to as the ‘‘acute’’ to exhibit a robust circadian rhythm of CAB expression. The response to light (9, 11). Many circadian-regulated processes precise waveform of CAB expression in light–dark cycles, exhibit acute effects of light: the expression of clock-controlled however, reflects a regulatory network that integrates infor- genes (ccg)inNeurospora is induced by light (12), for example, mation from photoreceptors, from the circadian clock and and the production of melatonin in cultured avian pinealocytes possibly from a developmental program. We have used the is suppressed (13). Current evidence indicates that the circa- luciferase reporter system to investigate CAB expression with dian oscillator is not required for these acute responses: ccg high time resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Characterization of Bioluminescence in Mangrove Lagoon, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, USVI
    Ecological Characterization of Bioluminescence in Mangrove Lagoon, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, USVI James L. Pinckney (PI)* Dianne I. Greenfield Claudia Benitez-Nelson Richard Long Michelle Zimberlin University of South Carolina Chad S. Lane Paula Reidhaar Carmelo Tomas University of North Carolina - Wilmington Bernard Castillo Kynoch Reale-Munroe Marcia Taylor University of the Virgin Islands David Goldstein Zandy Hillis-Starr National Park Service, Salt River Bay NHP & EP 01 January 2013 – 31 December 2013 Duration: 1 year * Contact Information Marine Science Program and Department of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 (803) 777-7133 phone (803) 777-4002 fax [email protected] email 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND: BIOLUMINESCENT DINOFLAGELLATES IN CARIBBEAN WATERS ............................................... 9 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................................... 19 OBJECTIVE I. CONFIRM THE IDENTIY OF THE BIOLUMINESCENT DINOFLAGELLATE(S) AND DOMINANT PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES IN MANGROVE LAGOON ........................................................................ 22 OBJECTIVE II. COLLECT MEASUREMENTS OF BASIC WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS (E.G., TEMPERATURE, SALINITY, DISSOLVED O2, TURBIDITY, PH, IRRADIANCE, DISSOLVED NUTRIENTS) FOR CORRELATION WITH PHYTOPLANKTON
    [Show full text]
  • Bioluminescence Imaging of DNA Synthetic Phase of Cell Cycle in Living Animals
    Bioluminescence Imaging of DNA Synthetic Phase of Cell Cycle in Living Animals Zhi-Hong Chen1,2, Rui-Jun Zhao1,3, Rong-Hui Li1,3, Cui-Ping Guo1,3, Guo-Jun Zhang1,3* 1 Breast Center, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People’s Republic of China, 2 Heilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, People’s Republic of China, 3 Cancer Research Center, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People’s Republic of China Abstract Bioluminescence reporter proteins have been widely used in the development of tools for monitoring biological events in living cells. Currently, some assays like flow cytometry analysis are available for studying DNA synthetic phase (S-phase) targeted anti-cancer drug activity in vitro; however, techniques for imaging of in vivo models remain limited. Cyclin A2 is known to promote S-phase entry in mammals. Its expression levels are low during G1-phase, but they increase at the onset of S-phase. Cyclin A2 is degraded during prometaphase by ubiquitin-dependent, proteasome-mediated proteolysis. In this study, we have developed a cyclin A2-luciferase (CYCA-Luc) fusion protein targeted for ubiquitin-proteasome dependent degradation, and have evaluated its utility in screening S-phase targeted anti-cancer drugs. Similar to endogenous cyclin A2, CYCA-Luc accumulates during S-phase and is degraded during G2/M-phase. Using Cdc20 siRNA we have demonstrated that Cdc20 can mediate CYCA-Luc degradation. Moreover, using noninvasive bioluminescent imaging, we demonstrated accumulation of CYCA-Luc in response to 10-hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT), an S-phase targeted anti-cancer drug, in human tumor cells in vivo and in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Glows There? Bioluminescence of Fireflies, Mushrooms, and Jellyfish Detailed Project Description
    Who Glows there? Bioluminescence of Fireflies, Mushrooms, and Jellyfish Glenna Smith Anthony Todd Background: Most people think of fireflies when it comes to bioluminescent or glow- in-the-dark organisms, but many other organisms use bioluminescence as well to communicate, ward off predators, or attract their meal. On land and in fresh water, it is fairly rare with only a handful of bioluminescent mushrooms and insects (not including the recently developed abundance of transgenic glowing organisms like tobacco or rabbits). In the ocean, however, and the deep sea in particular where it is the only source of light, bioluminescence is used by a multitude of creatures: fish, squid, jellyfish, sponges, algae. We propose construction of a small exhibit which will teach children about bioluminescence and allow them to ‘draw’ the bioluminescence onto glow-in-the- dark cutouts of the organisms using fiber optic ‘pens’. This exhibit could be positioned in SciTech near the “shadowbox”. Goals: Teach children about the utility of bioluminescence by various organisms (it isn’t just for show!). Children would learn how creatures communicate with and relate to each other using bioluminescence, and how bioluminescence is particularly useful in their environment (counterillumination camouflage). Target Museum: SciTech Target Audience: Grades K-10 (benchmarks addressed in appendix 1) Big Idea: Fireflies, jellyfish, and other organisms are using bioluminescence to communicate, protect themselves, and feed themselves. Detailed Project Description: This demo will be a fun, hands-on small exhibit to showcase several bioluminescent organisms, and explain why glowing is useful to their survival. The exhibit would feature a series of pictures of glowing fish, mushrooms, insects, (the pictures could be backlit).
    [Show full text]
  • Strongly Enhanced Bacterial Bioluminescence with the Ilux Operon for Single-Cell Imaging
    Strongly enhanced bacterial bioluminescence with the ilux operon for single-cell imaging Carola Gregora,1, Klaus C. Gwoscha, Steffen J. Sahla, and Stefan W. Hella,b,1 aDepartment of NanoBiophotonics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077 Göttingen, Germany; and bDepartment of Optical Nanoscopy, Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Contributed by Stefan W. Hell, December 8, 2017 (sent for review September 12, 2017; reviewed by David W. Piston and Alice Y. Ting) Bioluminescence imaging of single cells is often complicated by the filters are required, making the setup very simple. In addition, it is requirement of exogenous luciferins that can be poorly cell- possible to study processes where the intense excitation light re- permeable or produce high background signal. Bacterial biolumi- quired for fluorescence measurements would be disturbing, such + nescence is unique in that it uses reduced flavin mononucleotide as circadian rhythms or Ca2 activity in the retina (3, 4). Third, no as a luciferin, which is abundant in all cells, making this system phototoxicity or bleaching occurs, allowing image acquisition over purely genetically encodable by the lux operon. Unfortunately, the arbitrary timespans. Furthermore, bioluminescence is dependent use of bacterial bioluminescence has been limited by its low on metabolic energy, and hence, only metabolically active cells are brightness compared with other luciferases. Here, we report the visible, preventing artifacts due to the observation of severely generation of an improved lux operon named ilux with an approx- damaged or dead cells. imately sevenfold increased brightness when expressed in Escheri- In addition to the limitation by their low brightness, the lucif- chia coli; ilux can be used to image single E.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Bacterial Bioluminescence (<I>Lux</I>)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2012 Optimization of Bacterial Bioluminescence (lux) Expression and Development of Autonomous lux-Based Reporters in Human Cell Lines Tingting Xu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Biotechnology Commons Recommended Citation Xu, Tingting, "Optimization of Bacterial Bioluminescence (lux) Expression and Development of Autonomous lux-Based Reporters in Human Cell Lines. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1574 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Tingting Xu entitled "Optimization of Bacterial Bioluminescence (lux) Expression and Development of Autonomous lux-Based Reporters in Human Cell Lines." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Microbiology. Gary S. Sayler, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Alison Buchan, Timothy E. Sparer, Seung J. Baek, John P. Biggerstaff Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Optimization of Bacterial Bioluminescence (lux) Expression and Development of Autonomous lux- Based Reporters in Human Cell Lines A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Tingting Xu December 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Tingting Xu All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Shedding Light on the Bioluminescence “Paradox” Although Luminescence Provides Host Squids with Obvious Advantages, How Does It Benefit Light-Producing Bacteria?
    Shedding Light on the Bioluminescence “Paradox” Although luminescence provides host squids with obvious advantages, how does it benefit light-producing bacteria? Eric V. Stabb he fascinating biochemistry, genetics, have special significance for this bacterium. Bi- and cell density-dependent regula- oluminescence offers many such puzzles, and it tion of bacterial bioluminescence is unlikely a single solution will solve them all. T provoke a challenging question. Nonetheless, it is an exciting moment in bio- What good is it to bioluminescent luminescence research, with recent advances of- bacteria? fering the promise of answering the longstand- There may be no single answer to this seem- ing question, “how can bioluminescence ingly simple question. However, two recent ad- help bacteria?” Although researchers learned vances shed new light on the problem. First, nearly a century ago that luminescence reduces studies of the symbiosis between the biolumines- oxygen and that symbiotic bacteria inhabit the cent bacterium Vibrio fischeri and the Hawaiian light organs of squids, what was unimaginable bobtail squid bring an ecologically relevant until very recently is our ability to analyze the V. niche for a bioluminescent bacterium into focus fischeri genome sequence and to combine this under the discerning lens of controlled labora- knowledge with the ability to genetically manip- tory experimentation. Second, progress in under- ulate these bacteria and observe them under standing the genetics of V. fischeri, including controlled laboratory conditions in the ecologi- genomic sequencing of a squid symbiont, is en- cally relevant environment of a natural squid abling researchers to analyze how luminescence host. integrates into the physiology of this bacterial species and to test specific hypotheses about Biochemistry and Genetics of what advantage light production confers on the V.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles and Detrital Matter
    Biogeosciences, 7, 2851–2899, 2010 www.biogeosciences.net/7/2851/2010/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-7-2851-2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem E. Ramirez-Llodra1, A. Brandt2, R. Danovaro3, B. De Mol4, E. Escobar5, C. R. German6, L. A. Levin7, P. Martinez Arbizu8, L. Menot9, P. Buhl-Mortensen10, B. E. Narayanaswamy11, C. R. Smith12, D. P. Tittensor13, P. A. Tyler14, A. Vanreusel15, and M. Vecchione16 1Institut de Ciencies` del Mar, CSIC. Passeig Mar´ıtim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 2Biocentrum Grindel and Zoological Museum, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 3Department of Marine Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy 4GRC Geociencies` Marines, Parc Cient´ıfic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Adolf Florensa 8, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 5Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnolog´ıa, A.P. 70-305 Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico,` Mexico´ 6Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MS #24, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 7Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0218, USA 8Deutsches Zentrum fur¨ Marine Biodiversitatsforschung,¨ Sudstrand¨ 44, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany 9Ifremer Brest, DEEP/LEP, BP 70, 29280 Plouzane, France 10Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870, Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway 11Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban,
    [Show full text]
  • To See Or Not to See
    Bioluminescence 2009: ocean Living Light on the Deep Sea Floor Expedition To See or Not to See www.oceanexplorer.noaa.gov Focus Bioluminescence, color, and camouflage in deep ocean organisms Grade Level 9-12 (Life Science) Focus Question Image credit: NOAA. How are light and color important to organisms in deep ocean environments? Learning Objectives ] Students will be able to identify and discuss key factors that determine the effectiveness of color camouflage in pelagic and benthic habitats. ] Students will be able to describe how ambient light changes with Image credit: NOAA. increasing depth in the ocean. ] Students will be able to explain how the wavelength of light that illuminates an organism may determine the most effective camouflage coloration. ] Students will be able to explain how an organism that has effective camouflage coloration under ambient illumination may not be effectively camouflaged when it is illuminated by Image credit: NOAA. bioluminescence. Materials @ Copies of “Bioluminescence and Color Camouflage Inquiry Guide,” one copy for each student group @ Flashlights; one for each student group @ Blue filters (see Learning Procedure Step 1c) Audio/Visual Materials 9 (Optional) Images showing light and color in deep-sea Image credit: NOAA. environments and organisms (see Learning Procedure, Step 1d) Image captions on Page 2. Teaching Time Two 45-minute class periods, plus time for student research 1 www.oceanexplorer.noaa.gov Bioluminescence 2009: To See or Not to See Grades 9-12 (Life Science) Seating Arrangement Groups of 2-4 students Maximum Number of Students 30 Key Words Light Vision Bioluminescence Electromagnetic spectrum Color Wavelength Camouflage The lobate ctenophore Ocyropsis maculata as viewed under unpolarized light (top) and polarized light (bottom).
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Vision in the Deep-Sea Benthos: I
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences 10-1-2012 Light and Vision in the Deep-Sea Benthos: I. Bioluminescence at 500-1000 m Depth in the Bahamian Islands Sönke Johnsen Duke University Tamara M. Frank Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Steven H.D. Haddock Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Edith A. Widder Ocean Research and Conservation Association Charles G. Messing Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Find out more information about Nova Southeastern University and the Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Johnsen, Sönke, Tamara M. Frank, Steven HD Haddock, Edith A. Widder, and Charles G. Messing. "Light and vision in the deep-sea benthos: I. Bioluminescence at 500–1000 m depth in the Bahamian Islands." The ourJ nal of experimental biology 215, no. 19 (2012): 3335-3343. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3335 The Journal of Experimental Biology 215, 3335-3343 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi:10.1242/jeb.072009 RESEARCH ARTICLE Light and vision in the deep-sea benthos: I. Bioluminescence at 500–1000m depth in the Bahamian Islands Sönke Johnsen1,*, Tamara M.
    [Show full text]