DOCSLIB.ORG

Modified Gravity with Torsion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modified Gravity with Torsion Modified Gravity with Torsion Carina Suzana Negreanu Queens’ College 2018 September A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. Throughout this dissertation the plural pronoun ‘we’ is used for stylistic reasons and should be taken to refer to either the singular author, or to the author and her thesis advisors. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It does not exceed the prescribed word limit (60,000 words) for the relevant Degree Committee. iii Summary Title: Modified Gravity with Torsion Author: Carina Suzana Negreanu We are at a point in time when alternative gravitational theories are beginning to be constrained by high precision cosmological and astrophysical data. The work in this thesis focuses on applications of a particular modified gravity theory, the extended Weyl Gauge Theory (eWGT), that was recently developed by Prof. Lasenby and Prof. Hobson. The applications corresponds to subsets of the full theory that are applicable to different cosmological and astrophysical sectors. We start by investigating a simplified scenario that simulates a famous alternative theory of gravity, Weyl2 Gravity. Recently a couple of issues have been raised regarding the validity of the theory. Starting from a gauge theory perspective we bring a fresh contribution to the debate. We argue against the classical formulation by showing that the theory cannot support astrophysical matter (introduced by a perfect fluid). Furthermore we extend the theory and show that even if we allow torsion to be present we cannot reach a physical setup. In this process we have discovered interesting properties of the torsion field that could play an important role in generalised cosmological setups. In the next application we consider a cosmology dictated by a Riemann2 Lagrangian that can accommodate only radiation. We find new physical behaviour in the perturbed regime that discretises the power spectrum. We prove that the setup admits gravitational waves. Finally, we construct a new Lagrangian theory for spinning fluids. We show that it is compatible with current literature for a flat space time. Considering its extensibility we believe that it can be widely used in future research. v Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the help of a lot of people. I would like to start by thanking my supervisors, Prof. Anthony Lasenby and Prof. Mike Hobson, for the continuous support and encouragement. When I started my PhD I thought that the measure of success was given by the number of citations. My supervisors taught me that there are significantly more dimensions and helped me become an independent researcher that values scientific integrity. I am proud to say that I have been part of the Cavendish Astrophysics Group. I got the chance to meet great scientists who take pride in their work and are diligently trying to improve the world. I would like to thank everyone for the great conversations that have undeniably changed my worldview. My PhD experience would not be complete without the great times I spent with my of- ficemates Do Young Kim, Yun-Cherng Lin, Sonke Hee, Zoe Ye and ‘honorary’ officemates Lukas Hergt, Ed Higson and Will Handley. I will always cherish our endless conversations on politics, chinese calligraphy, ethics, gastronomy and math. Another thesis could have been written from all the encouraging messages my friends have sent me throughout the years. Do Young Kim and Jordan Boddy have helped me through the hardest times and I hope that one day I can return the favour. Last but by no means least, thanks go to my mom, my dad and my husband for almost unbelievable support. This thesis is dedicated to them. vii Contents Declaration iii Summary v Acknowledgements vii Contents ix 1 Introduction1 1.1 A brief encounter with Gauge Theories of Gravity ............... 4 1.2 Torsion Review.................................. 10 2 Weyl-squared Gravity 17 2.1 Introduction.................................... 17 2.2 A different perspective .............................. 23 2.3 Our framework .................................. 24 2.4 Looking at vacuum................................ 28 2.5 Adding Matter................................... 32 2.6 Introducing Torsion................................ 42 2.7 Cosmological Torsion............................... 44 2.8 Real Torsion ................................... 51 2.9 Conclusion .................................... 65 3 Riemann-squared Gravity 67 3.1 Introduction.................................... 67 3.2 Perturbation theory in Flat-Λ cosmology..................... 74 3.3 Perturbation Theory in Riemann-squared Gravity ................ 80 3.4 Gravitational Waves ............................... 97 3.5 Conclusion ....................................102 4 A new Lagrangian formalism for a perfect fluid with spin 105 4.1 Introduction....................................105 4.2 Non-spinning relativistic fluids..........................108 4.3 Spinning relativistic fluids ............................113 4.4 Applying the Theory ...............................125 4.5 Conclusions....................................136 5 Conclusions and Future Work 137 ix A Derivations for the Spinning Fluid Formalism 141 A.1 Looking at S˙(D˙ ) .................................141 A.2 Equations for the Spin bivector..........................142 A.3 Identity for Riemann construction ........................144 A.4 Identity for the Ω equation ............................145 Bibliography 147 x Chapter 1 Introduction The General Theory of Relativity (GR) has undoubtedly revolutionised our understanding of the Universe and from 1915 until this day Einstein’s field equations are still the norm when it comes to describing the behaviour of space-time on macroscopic scales. The considerable success of the theory has not stopped alternatives being proposed in order to overcome the worrying shortcomings (e.g. the need for Dark Matter and Dark Energy in our cosmological model) and in time a class of theories labelled “modified gravity theories” emerged. A more formal definition can be found in [1]: “ the effect of gravity on matter is tightly constrained to be mediated by interactions of the matter fields with a single rank-2 tensor. The term “gravitational theory” can then by functionally defined by the set of field equations obeyed by the rank-2 tensor, and any other non-matter fields it interacts with. If these equations are anything other than Einstein’s equations, then it is considered to be a modified theory of gravity”. There is a vast number of theories that satisfy this definition and each have merits and shortcomings, without an obvious candidate to replace (or generalize) Einstein’s theory. In our work we actually employ a theory that lies outside this sphere, where we describe gravity as a gauge field and our interactions are not defined by a single rank-2 tensor. To ensure some uniformity we start this thesis by making a general introduction to the main considerations behind theories of gravity. This description will be heavily based on a recent review of theories of gravitation, [1] and the staple book in Gauge Theories of Gravity [2]. 1 2 Chapter 1. Introduction The premise behind theories of gravity Any viable relativistic theory of gravity has to satisfy the foundational requirements (e.g. universality of free fall and isotropy of space) as well as be compatible with observational results. In this section we will briefly outline the current results and their importance in formulating a theory of gravity. We refer the reader to [1] for a more detailed description. When looking at the foundational requirements the equivalence principle plays an important role. In the following, we will employ the definitions of Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) - once an initial position and velocity have been prescribed all uncharged, freely falling test particles follow the same trajectories; Einstein Equivalence Principle (EEP) - the WEP is valid and “the outcome of any local non-gravitational experiment in a freely falling laboratory is independent of the velocity of the laboratory and its location in spacetime.” (Einstein); Strong Equivalence Principle (SEP) - the EEP is valid and “the gravitational motion of a small test body depends only on its initial position in spacetime and velocity, and not on its constitu- tion.”(Einstein) From Eo¨tvo¨s-type experiments we have a tight constraint on the relative difference in accelerations of two bodies to be of order 10−13 [3], which validates the Weak Equivalence Principle. Moreover, it is worth noting that by having a theory that satisfies the WEP the test proposed by Einstein in 1916 involving the gravitational redshifting of light is automatically passed: since energy-momentum is conserved in a closed system then it is only a test of WEP, and the Eo¨tvo¨s-type experiments
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Curvature Tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan Space: Irreducible Decompositions and Superenergy
    Curvature tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan space: Irreducible decompositions and superenergy Jens Boos and Friedrich W. Hehl [email protected] [email protected]"oeln.de University of Alberta University of Cologne & University of Missouri (uesday, %ugust 29, 17:0. Geometric Foundations of /ravity in (artu Institute of 0hysics, University of (artu) Estonia Geometric Foundations of /ravity Geometric Foundations of /auge Theory Geometric Foundations of /auge Theory ↔ Gravity The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: redundancy conserved e2ternal current 5 ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: Complex spinor 6eld: redundancy invariance conserved e2ternal current 5 conserved #7,8 current ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: Complex spinor 6eld: redundancy invariance conserved e2ternal current 5 conserved #7,8 current Complete, gauge-theoretical description: 9 local #7,) invariance ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: iers Complex spinor 6eld: rce carr ry of fo mic theo rrent rosco rnal cu m pic en exte att desc gredundancyiv er; N ript oet ion o conserved e2ternal current 5 invariance her f curr conserved #7,8 current e n t s Complete, gauge-theoretical description: gauge theory = complete description of matter and 9 local #7,) invariance how it interacts via gauge bosons ,3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincaré gauge theory *3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincaré gauge theory *3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincar; gauge theory *3,.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 305, Fall 2008 Problem Set 8 Due Thursday, December 3
    Physics 305, Fall 2008 Problem Set 8 due Thursday, December 3 1. Einstein A and B coefficients (25 pts): This problem is to make sure that you have read and understood Griffiths 9.3.1. Consider a system that consists of atoms with two energy levels E1 and E2 and a thermal gas of photons. There are N1 atoms with energy E1, N2 atoms with energy E2 and the energy density of photons with frequency ! = (E2 − E1)=~ is W (!). In thermal equilbrium at temperature T , W is given by the Planck distribution: ~!3 1 W (!) = 2 3 : π c exp(~!=kBT ) − 1 According to Einstein, this formula can be understood by assuming the following rules for the interaction between the atoms and the photons • Atoms with energy E1 can absorb a photon and make a transition to the excited state with energy E2; the probability per unit time for this transition to take place is proportional to W (!), and therefore given by Pabs = B12W (!) for some constant B12. • Atoms with energy E2 can make a transition to the lower energy state via stimulated emission of a photon. The probability per unit time for this to happen is Pstim = B21W (!) for some constant B21. • Atoms with energy E2 can also fall back into the lower energy state via spontaneous emission. The probability per unit time for spontaneous emission is independent of W (!). Let's call this probability Pspont = A21 : A21, B21, and B12 are known as Einstein coefficients. a. Write a differential equation for the time dependence of the occupation numbers N1 and N2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1108.0677V2 [Hep-Th]
    DAMTP-2011-59 MIFPA-11-34 THE SHEAR VISCOSITY TO ENTROPY RATIO: A STATUS REPORT Sera Cremonini ♣,♠ ∗ ♣ Centre for Theoretical Cosmology, DAMTP, CMS, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WA, UK ♠ George and Cynthia Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843–4242, USA (Dated: October 22, 2018) This review highlights some of the lessons that the holographic gauge/gravity duality has taught us regarding the behavior of the shear viscosity to entropy density in strongly coupled field theories. The viscosity to entropy ratio has been shown to take on a very simple universal value in all gauge theories with an Einstein gravity dual. Here we describe the origin of this universal ratio, and focus on how it is modified by generic higher derivative corrections corresponding to curvature corrections on the gravity side of the duality. In particular, certain curvature corrections are known to push the viscosity to entropy ratio below its universal value. This disproves a longstanding conjecture that such a universal value represents a strict lower bound for any fluid in nature. We discuss the main developments that have led to insight into the violation of this bound, and consider whether the consistency of the theory is responsible for setting a fundamental lower bound on the viscosity to entropy ratio. arXiv:1108.0677v2 [hep-th] 23 Aug 2011 ∗ Electronic address: [email protected] 2 Contents I. Introduction 3 A. The quark gluon plasma and the shear viscosity to entropy ratio 4 II. The universality of η/s 6 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Inis: Terminology Charts
    IAEA-INIS-13A(Rev.0) XA0400071 INIS: TERMINOLOGY CHARTS agree INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, AUGUST 1970 INISs TERMINOLOGY CHARTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ... ......... *.* 1 PREFACE 2 INTRODUCTION ... .... *a ... oo 3 LIST OF SUBJECT FIELDS REPRESENTED BY THE CHARTS ........ 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTOR INDEX ................ 9*999.9o.ooo .... 7 FOREWORD This document is one in a series of publications known as the INIS Reference Series. It is to be used in conjunction with the indexing manual 1) and the thesaurus 2) for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centrea. The thesaurus and terminology charts in their first edition (Rev.0) were produced as the result of an agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). Except for minor changesq the terminology and the interrela- tionships btween rms are those of the December 1969 edition of the Euratom Thesaurus 3) In all matters of subject indexing and ontrol, the IAEA followed the recommendations of Euratom for these charts. Credit and responsibility for the present version of these charts must go to Euratom. Suggestions for improvement from all interested parties. particularly those that are contributing to or utilizing the INIS magnetic-tape services are welcomed. These should be addressed to: The Thesaurus Speoialist/INIS Section Division of Scientific and Tohnioal Information International Atomic Energy Agency P.O. Box 590 A-1011 Vienna, Austria International Atomic Energy Agency Division of Sientific and Technical Information INIS Section June 1970 1) IAEA-INIS-12 (INIS: Manual for Indexing) 2) IAEA-INIS-13 (INIS: Thesaurus) 3) EURATOM Thesaurusq, Euratom Nuclear Documentation System.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Field Theories from Hamiltonian Constraint: Local
    Classical field theories from Hamiltonian constraint: Local symmetries and static gauge fields V´aclav Zatloukal∗ Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Bˇrehov´a7, 115 19 Praha 1, Czech Republic and Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstrasse 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany We consider the Hamiltonian constraint formulation of classical field theories, which treats space- time and the space of fields symmetrically, and utilizes the concept of momentum multivector. The gauge field is introduced to compensate for non-invariance of the Hamiltonian under local trans- formations. It is a position-dependent linear mapping, which couples to the Hamiltonian by acting on the momentum multivector. We investigate symmetries of the ensuing gauged Hamiltonian, and propose a generic form of the gauge field strength. In examples we show how a generic gauge field can be specialized in order to realize gravitational and/or Yang-Mills interaction. Gauge field dynamics is not discussed in this article. Throughout, we employ the mathematical language of geometric algebra and calculus. I. INTRODUCTION The Hamiltonian constraint is a concept useful for Hamiltonian formulation not only of general relativity [1], but, in fact, of a generic field theory, as pointed out in Ref. [2, Ch. 3], and exploited further in [3] and [4]. Characteristic features of this formulation are: finite-dimensional configu- ration space, and multivector-valued momentum variable. In this respect it is congruent with the covariant (or De Donder-Weyl) Hamiltonian formalism [5{13] and should be contrasted with the canonical (or instantaneous) Hamiltonian formalism [14], which utilizes an infinite-dimensional space of field configurations defined at a given instant of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications Gauge Theory/Gravity
    APPLICATIONS OF THE GAUGE THEORY/GRAVITY CORRESPONDENCE Andrea Helen Prinsloo A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town. May, 2010 i Abstract The gauge theory/gravity correspondence encompasses a variety of different specific dualities. We study examples of both Super Yang-Mills/type IIB string theory and Super Chern-Simons-matter/type IIA string theory dualities. We focus on the recent ABJM correspondence as an example of the latter. We conduct a detailed investigation into the properties of D-branes and their operator 3 duals. The D2-brane dual giant graviton on AdS4×CP is initially studied: we calculate its spectrum of small fluctuations and consider open string excitations in both the short pp-wave and long semiclassical string limits. We extend Mikhailov's holomorphic curve construction to build a giant graviton on 1;1 AdS5 × T . This is a non-spherical D3-brane configuration, which factorizes at maxi- mal size into two dibaryons on the base manifold T1;1. We present a fluctuation analysis and also consider attaching open strings to the giant's worldvolume. We finally propose 3 an ansatz for the D4-brane giant graviton on AdS4 × CP , which is embedded in the complex projective space. 2 The maximal D4-brane giant factorizes into two CP dibaryons. A comparison is made 2 between the spectrum of small fluctuations about one such CP dibaryon and the conformal dimensions of BPS excitations of the dual determinant operator in ABJM theory. We conclude with a study of the thermal properties of an ensemble of pp-wave strings under a Lunin-Maldacena deformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Radiative Transfer
    RADIATIVE PROCESSE S IN ASTROPHYSICS GEORGE B. RYBICKI, ALAN P. LIGHTMAN Copyright 0 2004 WY-VCHVerlag GmbH L Co. KCaA FUNDAMENTALS OF RADIATIVE TRANSFER 1.1 THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM; ELEMENTARY PROPERTIES OF RADIATION Electromagnetic radiation can be decomposed into a spectrum of con- stituent components by a prism, grating, or other devices, as was dis- covered quite early (Newton, 1672, with visible light). The spectrum corresponds to waves of various wavelengths and frequencies, related by Xv=c, where v is the frequency of the wave, h is its wavelength, and c-3.00~10" cm s-I is the free space velocity of light. (For waves not traveling in a vacuum, c is replaced by the appropriate velocity of the wave in the medium.) We can divide the spectrum up into various regions, as is done in Figure 1.1. For convenience we have given the energy E = hv and temperature T= E/k associated with each wavelength. Here h is Planck's constant = 6.625 X erg s, and k is Boltzmann's constant = 1.38 X erg K-I. This chart will prove to be quite useful in converting units or in getting a quick view of the relevant magnitude of quantities in a given portion of the spectrum. The boundaries between different regions are somewhat arbitrary, but conform to accepted usage. 1 2 Fundamentals of Radiatiw Transfer -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 log A (cm) Wavelength I I I I I log Y IHr) Frequency 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 I I I I I I I log Elev) Energy 43 21 0-1 I I 1 I I I log T("K)Temperature Y ray X-ray UV Visible IR Radio Figum 1.1 The electromagnetic spctnun.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements Acknowl
    1277 Acknowledgements Acknowl. A.1 The Properties of Light by Helen Wächter, Markus W. Sigrist by Richard Haglund The authors thank a number of coworkers for their The author thanks Prof. Emil Wolf for helpful discus- valuable input, notably R. Bartlome, Dr. C. Fischer, sions, and gratefully acknowledges the financial support D. Marinov, Dr. J. Rey, M. Stahel, and Dr. D. Vogler. of a Senior Scientist Award from the Alexander von The financial support by the Swiss National Science Humboldt Foundation and of the Medical Free-Electron Foundation and ETH Zurich for the isotopomer studies Laser program of the Department of Defense (Con- is gratefully acknowledged. tract F49620-01-1-0429) during the preparation of this chapter. by Jürgen Helmcke In writing the chapter on frequency-stabilized lasers, A.4 Nonlinear Optics the author has greatly benefited from fruitful coopera- by Aleksei Zheltikov, Anne L’Huillier, Ferenc Krausz tion and helpful discussions with his colleagues at PTB, We acknowledge the support of the European Com- in particular with Drs. Fritz Riehle, Harald Schnatz, munity’s Human Potential Programme under contract Uwe Sterr, and Harald Telle. Special thanks belong to HPRN-CT-2000-00133 (ATTO) and the Swedish Sci- Dr. Fritz Riehle for his careful and critical reading of the ence Council. manuscript. Part of the work discussed in this chapter was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft A.5 Optical Materials and Their Properties (DFG) under SFB 407. by Klaus Bonrad The author of Sect. 5.9.2 is grateful to Dr. Thomas C.12 Femtosecond Laser Pulses: Däubler, Dr. Dirk Hertel, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • General Relativity Vs. Gauge Theory Gravity
    Experimental Test of Quantum Gravity: General Relativity vs. Gauge Theory Gravity Peter Cameron and Michaele Suisse∗ PO Box 1030 Mattituck, NY USA 11952 (Dated: September 16, 2017) With recent detection of gravitational waves[1, 2], the possibility exists that orientation-dependent detector re- sponses might permit distinguishing between General Relativity (GR) and Gauge Theory Gravity (GTG)[3]. The classical equivalence of these two models was established over twenty years ago.[4{7]. The question is whether this equivalence persists in their respective quantum theories. While such a theory is not yet known to exist for the curved spacetime of GR, the task is not so difficult in the flat Minkowski spacetime of GTG. The language of GTG is geometric Clifford alge- bra, the background-independent[8] interaction lan- guage of fundamental geometric objects of space - Eu- clid's point, line, plane, and volume elements, the ge- ometric objects of Pauli algebra of three-dimensional space. In quantized GTG they are taken to comprise the vacuum wavefunction. Their interactions gener- ate the Dirac algebra of four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime[9]. They permit one to define a geometric wavefunction at the Planck length, and when endowed with experimentally observed quantized electric and FIG. 1. Classical GR says interferometer response is optimal for magnetic fields reveal an exact relation between elec- orientation (A) and less so for (B)[20], whereas quantized GTG tromagnetism and gravity, yielding a naturally finite, is optimal for (B) and less so for (A). confined, and gauge invariant quantum theory that has no free parameters and contains gravity[10{16].
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of the Gauge/Gravity Duality (DRAFT: July 30, 2013)
    Applications of the Gauge/Gravity Duality by Kevin Robert Leslie Whyte B. Applied Science, University of Waterloo, 2004 B. Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Doctor of Philosophy in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Physics) The University Of British Columbia (Vancouver) August 2013 c Kevin Robert Leslie Whyte, 2013 Abstract While varied applications of gauge/gravity duality have arisen in literature from studies of condensed matter systems including superconductivity to studies of quenched Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), this thesis focuses on applications of the dual- ity to holographic QCD-like field theories and to inflationary model that uses a QCD-like field theory. In particular the first half of the thesis examines a holographic QCD-like field theory with scalar quarks closely related to the Sakai-Sugimoto model of holo- graphic QCD. The behaviour of baryons and mesons in the model is examined to find a continuous mass spectrum for the mesons, and a baryon that can identified with a topological charge. It then slightly modifies the theory to further study the behaviour of holographic field theories. The second half of the thesis presents a novel model for early Universe infla- tion, using an SU(N) gauge field theory as the inflaton. The inflation model is studied at both weak coupling and strong coupling using the gauge/gravity dual- ity. The robustness of model’s predictions to exciting multiple inflationary fields beyond the single field of its original proposal, and its possible role in breaking the supersymmetry of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) is also explored.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Structure of Space and Time
    QcEntwn Structure &pace and Time This page intentionally left blank Proceedings of the 23rd Solvay Conference on Physics Brussels, Belgium 1 - 3 December 2005 The Quantum Structure of Space and Time EDITORS DAVID GROSS Kavli Institute. University of California. Santa Barbara. USA MARC HENNEAUX Universite Libre de Bruxelles & International Solvay Institutes. Belgium ALEXANDER SEVRIN Vrije Universiteit Brussel & International Solvay Institutes. Belgium \b World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONOON * SINGAPORE BElJlNG * SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI * CHENNAI Published by World Scientific Publishing Co. Re. Ltd. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224 USA ofJice: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601 UK ofice; 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE British Library Cataloguing-in-PublicationData A catalogue record for this hook is available from the British Library. THE QUANTUM STRUCTURE OF SPACE AND TIME Proceedings of the 23rd Solvay Conference on Physics Copyright 0 2007 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereoi may not be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the Publisher. For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy is not required from the publisher. ISBN 981-256-952-9 ISBN 981-256-953-7 (phk) Printed in Singapore by World Scientific Printers (S) Pte Ltd The International Solvay Institutes Board of Directors Members Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 700: Radiation. 1 Basic Radiation Properties
    Astronomy 700: Radiation. 1 Basic Radiation Properties 1.1 Basic definitions Fundamental importance to Astronomy: Almost exclusive carrier of information Radiation: Energy transport by electromagnetic fields Other forms of energy transport: cosmic rays • stochastic transport (micro: conduction, macro: convection) • gravitational waves • bulk transport (organized flows) • plasma waves • ... • Transport time variability (see section of E&M) → 1.1.1 The spectrum The most natural description of electromagnetic radiation is through Fourier decomposition into waves: f(~r, t) f(~k,ν) (1.1) ↔ where E is some variable describing the radiation field. Question: Why is this so natural? As we will shortly see, electromagnetic radiation naturally decomposes into waves with wave- length λ and frequency ν 1 Often, it is convenient to write the wave vector ~k =2πk/λˆ and angular frequency ω =2πν. In vacuum, group and phase velocity of those waves are equal: 10 1 λν = ∂ω/∂k c 2.99792... 10 cms− (1.2) ≡ ≡ × Fourier decomposition allows us to describe the local spectrum of the radiation at a fixed point in space as the Fourier transform ∞ f f(ν)= dtei2πνtf(t) (1.3) F ≡ Z−∞ and the inverse Fourier transform 1 ∞ i2πνt − f f(t)= dνe− f(ν) (1.4) F ≡ Z−∞ Without going into any details on Lebesque integration, it is worth pointing out the following identity: The inverse Fourier transform of a delta function in frequency is ∞ 1 i2πνt i2πν0t − δ(ν ν )= dνe− δ(ν ν )= e− (1.5) F − 0 − 0 Z−∞ i2πν0 t Thus, the Fourier transform of e− is ∞ i2πν0t i2π(ν ν0)t e− = dte − = δ(ν ν ) (1.6) F − 0 Z−∞ as one would expect for a decomposition into a spectrum of different exponentials.
    [Show full text]