Astronomy 700: Radiation. 1 Basic Radiation Properties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Astronomy 700: Radiation. 1 Basic Radiation Properties Astronomy 700: Radiation. 1 Basic Radiation Properties 1.1 Basic definitions Fundamental importance to Astronomy: Almost exclusive carrier of information Radiation: Energy transport by electromagnetic fields Other forms of energy transport: cosmic rays • stochastic transport (micro: conduction, macro: convection) • gravitational waves • bulk transport (organized flows) • plasma waves • ... • Transport time variability (see section of E&M) → 1.1.1 The spectrum The most natural description of electromagnetic radiation is through Fourier decomposition into waves: f(~r, t) f(~k,ν) (1.1) ↔ where E is some variable describing the radiation field. Question: Why is this so natural? As we will shortly see, electromagnetic radiation naturally decomposes into waves with wave- length λ and frequency ν 1 Often, it is convenient to write the wave vector ~k =2πk/λˆ and angular frequency ω =2πν. In vacuum, group and phase velocity of those waves are equal: 10 1 λν = ∂ω/∂k c 2.99792... 10 cms− (1.2) ≡ ≡ × Fourier decomposition allows us to describe the local spectrum of the radiation at a fixed point in space as the Fourier transform ∞ f f(ν)= dtei2πνtf(t) (1.3) F ≡ Z−∞ and the inverse Fourier transform 1 ∞ i2πνt − f f(t)= dνe− f(ν) (1.4) F ≡ Z−∞ Without going into any details on Lebesque integration, it is worth pointing out the following identity: The inverse Fourier transform of a delta function in frequency is ∞ 1 i2πνt i2πν0t − δ(ν ν )= dνe− δ(ν ν )= e− (1.5) F − 0 − 0 Z−∞ i2πν0 t Thus, the Fourier transform of e− is ∞ i2πν0t i2π(ν ν0)t e− = dte − = δ(ν ν ) (1.6) F − 0 Z−∞ as one would expect for a decomposition into a spectrum of different exponentials. N.B.: Fourier transform conventions often differ in normalization and definition of frequency (ω vs. ν), so take care to make sure not to miss factors of 2π along the way. Broad classification into spectral regions: Astronomy has fallen historically into different bands, enforced by fundamentally different observ- ing techniques. The following figure shows the rough classification of spectral regions (largely anecdotal): 2 radio IR UV X-rays γ-rays visible 9 12 15 18 ν [Hz] Figure 1.1: Common classification into different spectral bands, dictated by observational tech- nique 1.1.2 Wave-particle duality and the radiative limit Since we measure radiation only through the interaction with matter, wave propagation in vacuum is not all that interesting. When radiation interacts with matter, quantum mechanics can become important. As Planck found (and as we will see later in the semester), photon phase space is granular, with a fundamental quantized phase space volume of h3. Photon energy: Eν = hν 28 where h is the Planck constant h 6.626075... 10− ergss ≡ × Photons are relativistic, thus their momentum is directly proportional to their energy: Photon momentum: Pν = hν/c N.B.: The classical description of electromagnetic waves is valid only in the statistical limit of many photons. The optical limit of radiation (“ray treatment”) is further only valid in the limit of large distances r: r λ ≫ This is the limit that we will concentrate on for the next sections. Finally, the wave field we detect from astronomical sources is virtually always in the far field limit: 3 r λc/u, where u is the characteristic velocity of the radiating particles. ≫ The far-field limit guarantees that the optical limit is safely satisfied for the travel of light between the source and us, though quantum mechanical effects come into play when the radiation inter- acts with the detector, where characteristic distances can be smaller than the wavelength of the radiation. 1.1.3 Observables and basic definitions of radiation quantities Astronomers want to measure radiation. Suppose you wanted to build a light capturing device, what quantities could you measure, and what properties of the device would be important? Question: What are the properties describing a “ray” of light? Observable: total energy of light captured dE Detector properties: Angular resolution/pixel scale: solid angle dΩ • Bandwidth: frequency/wavelength range dν • Exposure: time interval of measurement dt • Effective area: total sensitive area of detector dA • Independent variables: position ~r • ˆ direction ~k • frequency ν • time t • (polarization angle ψ) • A) Specific intensity or (surface) brightness: Iν ˆ Define a quantity that describes completely how the measured energy dE depends on ~r, ~k, ν, t, and describes the radiation field as completely as possible (neglecting polarization) given the information from the detector: dE I (~r, t, k,νˆ ) (1.7) ν ≡ dν dtdΩ dA 4 Figure 1.2: Sketch of wave direction, differential surface element, and solid angle. Note: for Iν, dA is taken as perpendicular to kˆ, while flux Fν is measured with respect to some fixed dA and integrates over all solid angles (i.e., kˆ does not have to be perpendicular to dA). where the surface dA is taken perpendicular to the direction of the ray kˆ, as shown in the figure. From Iν we can construct a number of important integrated quantities, or “moments” with respect to different observables. B) Mean intensity: Jν The zeroth moment of Iν with respect to the polar angle cos θ is the mean intensity: 1 J dΩI (1.8) ν ≡ 4π ν Z4π C) Specific flux: Fν Energy flux at frequency ν across a surface dA, integrated over all photon directions (coming from both sides of the surface). F dΩcosθI (1.9) ν ≡ ν Z4π where θ is measured relative to the normal of dA. Fν is the first moment of Iν with respect to cos θ. For an unresolved object, we can typically not determine the solid angle spanned by the object. 5 The flux is therefore the most general quantity we can derive directly from any measurements for the object. N.B.: Fν =0 for isotropic radiation. Sometimes it is useful to define a photon number flux. Since eν = hν, this is simply Φν = Fν/hν (1.10) D) Total flux: F Total energy flux across dA: ∞ F dνF (1.11) ≡ ν Z0 E) Radiation pressure: prad Total momentum flux across dA: ∞ I p = dν dΩcos2 θ ν (1.12) rad c Z0 Z4π 2 Question: prad is the second moment of Iν w.r.t. cosθ. Where does the cos θ come from? F) Radiative energy density: uν Amount of radiative energy contained per unit volume. Differential volume element: dV = dAds, where ds is measured along any given ray. Since light always travels at c, we have dt = ds/c and can integrate over all rays and write duν = dE/(dAdsdν)= dE/(cdtdAdν): I dE u = du = dΩ ν = (1.13) ν ν c dAdsdν Z Z4π which can easily be verified to have the proper dimensions, and ∞ u = dνuν (1.14) Z0 6 N.B.: For isotropic radiation, u =3p, which is an important analog to relativistic particles (verify this as a quick exercise in integration in spherical polar coordinates). G) Photon density: nν Number of photons per unit frequency interval per unit volume. Since eν = hν, we have u n = ν (1.15) ν hν H) Luminosity: Lν Specific (spectral) luminosity Lν = dAFν (1.16) I and total, “bolometric” luminosity: L = dAF (1.17) I measure the total radiative output of an astronomical object. This is mostly what is of astrophysical interest and it has to be extrapolated from a set of measurements. 33 1 Example: The sun has a luminosity of L =3.83 10 ergss− . ⊙ × Question: At a distance of r =1.5 1013 cm, what is the solar flux measured on earth (i.e., the solar constant)? × I) Spectral index: α It is often convenient to plot spectra on a log-log plot in frequency, log Fν vs. log ν. Many emission processes produce powerlaw-type spectra over some frequency range, α F ν− (1.18) ν ∝ which appear as straight lines in a log-log plot. It is then useful to define a local spectral index ∂log F α ν (1.19) ≡− ∂log ν 7 which is the local slope of the spectrum in a log-log plot and is well defined even for non-powerlaw spectra, with the implicit understanding that α depends on frequency. Sometimes it is also useful to define a photon index Γ ∂logΦ Γ ν = α +1 (1.20) ≡− ∂log ν N.B.: Sometimes the sign convention for the powerlaw index is switched, so make sure you understand how α is defined in a specific application J) ν λ conversions: − Given λν = c, We can express any specific quantity fν = df/dν with respect to wavelength instead: df df dλ λ2 c f = = f or f f (1.21) ν dν dλ dν ≡ λ c λ ≡ ν=c/λ λ2 Note the sign conversion implicit here such that both fν and fλ are always defined as positive. 1.1.4 Inverse square law From eq. (1.16) and energy conservation, it follows that the flux from an isotropic radiation source must obey L F = ν (1.22) ν 4πr2 For large distances (r Robj), the small angle approximation implies that radiation appears quasi-isotropic and the inverse≫ square law holds even for intrinsically non-isotropic sources. This approximation holds as long as dln I /dθ r/R. ν ≪ 1.1.5 Conservation of surface brightness Consider an object of surface area dS and an observer along a ray ~k at distance r. In the small 2 angle approximation, the solid angle subtended by the source is dΩS = dS/r , while the area dA 2 over which a given bundle of rays is spread is proportional to dA = dΩAr .
Recommended publications
  • Physics 305, Fall 2008 Problem Set 8 Due Thursday, December 3
    Physics 305, Fall 2008 Problem Set 8 due Thursday, December 3 1. Einstein A and B coefficients (25 pts): This problem is to make sure that you have read and understood Griffiths 9.3.1. Consider a system that consists of atoms with two energy levels E1 and E2 and a thermal gas of photons. There are N1 atoms with energy E1, N2 atoms with energy E2 and the energy density of photons with frequency ! = (E2 − E1)=~ is W (!). In thermal equilbrium at temperature T , W is given by the Planck distribution: ~!3 1 W (!) = 2 3 : π c exp(~!=kBT ) − 1 According to Einstein, this formula can be understood by assuming the following rules for the interaction between the atoms and the photons • Atoms with energy E1 can absorb a photon and make a transition to the excited state with energy E2; the probability per unit time for this transition to take place is proportional to W (!), and therefore given by Pabs = B12W (!) for some constant B12. • Atoms with energy E2 can make a transition to the lower energy state via stimulated emission of a photon. The probability per unit time for this to happen is Pstim = B21W (!) for some constant B21. • Atoms with energy E2 can also fall back into the lower energy state via spontaneous emission. The probability per unit time for spontaneous emission is independent of W (!). Let's call this probability Pspont = A21 : A21, B21, and B12 are known as Einstein coefficients. a. Write a differential equation for the time dependence of the occupation numbers N1 and N2.
    [Show full text]
  • Inis: Terminology Charts
    IAEA-INIS-13A(Rev.0) XA0400071 INIS: TERMINOLOGY CHARTS agree INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, AUGUST 1970 INISs TERMINOLOGY CHARTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ... ......... *.* 1 PREFACE 2 INTRODUCTION ... .... *a ... oo 3 LIST OF SUBJECT FIELDS REPRESENTED BY THE CHARTS ........ 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTOR INDEX ................ 9*999.9o.ooo .... 7 FOREWORD This document is one in a series of publications known as the INIS Reference Series. It is to be used in conjunction with the indexing manual 1) and the thesaurus 2) for the preparation of INIS input by national and regional centrea. The thesaurus and terminology charts in their first edition (Rev.0) were produced as the result of an agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). Except for minor changesq the terminology and the interrela- tionships btween rms are those of the December 1969 edition of the Euratom Thesaurus 3) In all matters of subject indexing and ontrol, the IAEA followed the recommendations of Euratom for these charts. Credit and responsibility for the present version of these charts must go to Euratom. Suggestions for improvement from all interested parties. particularly those that are contributing to or utilizing the INIS magnetic-tape services are welcomed. These should be addressed to: The Thesaurus Speoialist/INIS Section Division of Scientific and Tohnioal Information International Atomic Energy Agency P.O. Box 590 A-1011 Vienna, Austria International Atomic Energy Agency Division of Sientific and Technical Information INIS Section June 1970 1) IAEA-INIS-12 (INIS: Manual for Indexing) 2) IAEA-INIS-13 (INIS: Thesaurus) 3) EURATOM Thesaurusq, Euratom Nuclear Documentation System.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Radiative Transfer
    RADIATIVE PROCESSE S IN ASTROPHYSICS GEORGE B. RYBICKI, ALAN P. LIGHTMAN Copyright 0 2004 WY-VCHVerlag GmbH L Co. KCaA FUNDAMENTALS OF RADIATIVE TRANSFER 1.1 THE ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM; ELEMENTARY PROPERTIES OF RADIATION Electromagnetic radiation can be decomposed into a spectrum of con- stituent components by a prism, grating, or other devices, as was dis- covered quite early (Newton, 1672, with visible light). The spectrum corresponds to waves of various wavelengths and frequencies, related by Xv=c, where v is the frequency of the wave, h is its wavelength, and c-3.00~10" cm s-I is the free space velocity of light. (For waves not traveling in a vacuum, c is replaced by the appropriate velocity of the wave in the medium.) We can divide the spectrum up into various regions, as is done in Figure 1.1. For convenience we have given the energy E = hv and temperature T= E/k associated with each wavelength. Here h is Planck's constant = 6.625 X erg s, and k is Boltzmann's constant = 1.38 X erg K-I. This chart will prove to be quite useful in converting units or in getting a quick view of the relevant magnitude of quantities in a given portion of the spectrum. The boundaries between different regions are somewhat arbitrary, but conform to accepted usage. 1 2 Fundamentals of Radiatiw Transfer -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 log A (cm) Wavelength I I I I I log Y IHr) Frequency 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 I I I I I I I log Elev) Energy 43 21 0-1 I I 1 I I I log T("K)Temperature Y ray X-ray UV Visible IR Radio Figum 1.1 The electromagnetic spctnun.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements Acknowl
    1277 Acknowledgements Acknowl. A.1 The Properties of Light by Helen Wächter, Markus W. Sigrist by Richard Haglund The authors thank a number of coworkers for their The author thanks Prof. Emil Wolf for helpful discus- valuable input, notably R. Bartlome, Dr. C. Fischer, sions, and gratefully acknowledges the financial support D. Marinov, Dr. J. Rey, M. Stahel, and Dr. D. Vogler. of a Senior Scientist Award from the Alexander von The financial support by the Swiss National Science Humboldt Foundation and of the Medical Free-Electron Foundation and ETH Zurich for the isotopomer studies Laser program of the Department of Defense (Con- is gratefully acknowledged. tract F49620-01-1-0429) during the preparation of this chapter. by Jürgen Helmcke In writing the chapter on frequency-stabilized lasers, A.4 Nonlinear Optics the author has greatly benefited from fruitful coopera- by Aleksei Zheltikov, Anne L’Huillier, Ferenc Krausz tion and helpful discussions with his colleagues at PTB, We acknowledge the support of the European Com- in particular with Drs. Fritz Riehle, Harald Schnatz, munity’s Human Potential Programme under contract Uwe Sterr, and Harald Telle. Special thanks belong to HPRN-CT-2000-00133 (ATTO) and the Swedish Sci- Dr. Fritz Riehle for his careful and critical reading of the ence Council. manuscript. Part of the work discussed in this chapter was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft A.5 Optical Materials and Their Properties (DFG) under SFB 407. by Klaus Bonrad The author of Sect. 5.9.2 is grateful to Dr. Thomas C.12 Femtosecond Laser Pulses: Däubler, Dr. Dirk Hertel, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing Course
    Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing Course Outline 2013 (Draft) Part I. Introduction to Quantum Physics Chapter 1. Quantum Concepts and Experimental Facts 1.1. Blackbody Radiation and Planck’s Radiation Law [Textbook “Laser Spectroscopy” Sections 2.1 – 2.4, Corney’s book Section 1.1] 1.2. Photoelectric Effect and Quantized Energy [Textbook Section 4.5.4, Corney’s book Section 1.2] 1.3. Compton Effect and Quantized Momentum 1.4. Hydrogen Spectra and Discrete Energy Levels [Textbook Section 4.1, Corney’s book Section 1.3] 1.5. Bohr’s Model [Corney’s book Sections 1.4-1.8] Chapter 2. Wave-Particle Duality [Dirac’s The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, and Cohen-Tannoudji’s Quantum Mechanics, vol. I and II] 2.1. Wave Behavior of Light 2.2. Single Photon Experiment 2.3. Wave-Particle Duality of Light 2.4. Wave-Particle Duality of Material Particles 2.5. de Broglie Relationship Chapter 3. Basics of Quantum Mechanics (Postulates, Principles, and Mathematic Formalism) [Cohen-Tannoudji’s Quantum Mechanics, vol. I and II] 3.1. Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 3.2. Principle of Superposition of States 3.3. Principle of Motion – Schrödinger Equation 3.4. Principle of Uncertainty – Indeterminacy 3.5. Dirac Notation and Representations 3.6. Solutions to Eigenvalue Equation and Schrödinger Equation Part II. Fundamentals of Atomic Spectroscopy Chapter 4. Introduction to Atomic Structure and Atomic Spectra Chapter 5. Atomic Structure 5.1. Atomic Structure Overview 5.2. Atomic Structure for Hydrogen Atom and Hydrogen-like Ions 1. Hydrogen energy eigenvalues and eigenstate in Coulomb Potential 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sitzungsberichte Der Leibniz-Sozietät, Jahrgang 2003, Band 61
    SITZUNGSBERICHTE DER LEIBNIZ-SOZIETÄT Band 61 • Jahrgang 2003 trafo Verlag Berlin ISSN 0947-5850 ISBN 3-89626-462-1 Inhalt Heinz Kautzleben Hans-Jürgen Treder, die kosmische Physik und die Geo- und Kosmoswissenschaften >>> Herbert Hörz Kosmische Rätsel in philosophischer Sicht >>> Karl-Heinz Schmidt Die Lokale Galaxiengruppe >>> Helmut Moritz Epicycles in Modern Physics >>> Armin Uhlmann Raum-Zeit und Quantenphysik >>> Rainer Schimming Über Gravitationsfeldgleichungen 4. Ordnung >>> Werner Holzmüller Energietransfer und Komplementarität im kosmischen Geschehen >>> Klaus Strobach Mach'sches Prinzip und die Natur von Trägheit und Zeit >>> Fritz Gackstatter Separation von Raum und Zeit beim eingeschränkten Dreikörperproblem mit Anwendung bei den Resonanzphänomenen im Saturnring und Planetoidengürtel >>> Gerald Ulrich Fallende Katzen >>> Rainer Burghardt New Embedding of the Schwarzschild Geometry. Exterior Solution >>> Holger Filling und Ralf Koneckis Die Goldpunkte auf der frühbronzezeitlichen Himmelsscheibe von Nebra >>> Joachim Auth Hans-Jürgen Treder und die Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin >>> Thomas Schalk Hans-Jürgen Treder und die Förderung des wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchses >>> Wilfried Schröder Hans-Jürgen Treder und die kosmische Physik >>> Dieter B. Herrmann Quantitative Methoden in der Astronomiegeschichte >>> Gottfried Anger und Helmut Moritz Inverse Problems and Uncertainties in Science and Medicine >>> Ernst Buschmann Geodäsie: die Raum+Zeit-Disziplin im Bereich des Planeten Erde >>> Hans Scheurich Quantengravitation auf der Grundlage eines stringkollektiven Fermionmodells >>> Hans Scheurich Ein mathematisches Modell der Subjektivität >>> Hans-Jürgen Treder Anstelle eines Schlußwortes >>> Leibniz-Sozietät/Sitzungsberichte 61(2003)5, 5–16 Heinz Kautzleben Hans-Jürgen Treder, die kosmische Physik und die Geo- und Kosmoswissenschaften Laudatio auf Hans-Jürgen Treder anläßlich des Festkolloquiums am 02.10.2003 Das Kolloquium ist ein Geburtstagsgeschenk der Leibniz-Sozietät an ihr Mit- glied Hans-Jürgen Treder.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2006.10084V3 [Quant-Ph] 7 Mar 2021
    Quantum time dilation in atomic spectra Piotr T. Grochowski ,1, ∗ Alexander R. H. Smith ,2, 3, y Andrzej Dragan ,4, 5, z and Kacper Dębski 4, x 1Center for Theoretical Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Aleja Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland 2Department of Physics, Saint Anselm College, Manchester, New Hampshire 03102, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA 4Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland 5Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, 117543 Singapore, Singapore (Dated: March 9, 2021) Quantum time dilation occurs when a clock moves in a superposition of relativistic momentum wave packets. The lifetime of an excited hydrogen-like atom can be used as a clock, which we use to demonstrate how quantum time dilation manifests in a spontaneous emission process. The resulting emission rate differs when compared to the emission rate of an atom prepared in a mixture of momentum wave packets at order v2=c2. This effect is accompanied by a quantum correction to the Doppler shift due to the coherence between momentum wave packets. This quantum Doppler shift affects the spectral line shape at order v=c. However, its effect on the decay rate is suppressed when compared to the effect of quantum time dilation. We argue that spectroscopic experiments offer a technologically feasible platform to explore the effects of quantum time dilation. I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the present work is to provide evi- dence in support of the conjecture that quantum time The quintessential feature of quantum mechanics is dilation is universal.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAM and ABSTRACTS
    PROGRAM and ABSTRACTS Washington, DC skyline at night. © Shutterstock/fstockfoto Eighth International Conference on Atomic and Molecular Data and Their Applications: ICAMDATA-8 September 30 - October 4, 2012 National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Gaithersburg, MD, USA Local Conference Committee John Gillaspy, NIST, Conference Chair Jim Babb, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics John Curry, NIST Jeff Fuhr, NIST Rodrigo Ibacache, NIST Timothy Kallman, NASA GSFC Karen Olsen, NIST Yuri Podpaly, NIST Glenn Wahlgren, NASA International Program Committee W. Wiese, USA, Chair A. Mueller, Germany S. Fritzsche, Germany, Vice Chair I. Murakami, Japan G. Zissis, France, Secretary Yu. Ralchenko, USA K. Bartschat, USA D. Reiter, Germany B. Braams, USA (IAEA) Y. Rhee, S. Korea S. Buckman, Australia E. Roueff, France R. Carman, Australia T. Ryabchika, Russia M.-L. Dubernet, France A. Ryabtsev, Russia J. Gillaspy, USA P. Scott, UK J. Horacek, Czech Rep. V. Shevelko, Russia R. Janev, Macedonia J. Wang, China C. Mendoza, Venezuela J.-S. Yoon, S. Korea 1 Important Information and Contact Numbers Please be aware that access to the NIST grounds is restricted. Registrants are cleared for access M-Th through the main gate on Route 117 (West Diamond Avenue, which is the extension of Clopper Road) by presenting a government-issued photo ID (passport or U.S. Driver's License, for example). After 5PM registrants will need a NIST escort to enter the grounds. Participants in the Satellite meetings on Friday, who have not already done so, must contact one of the Satellite Meeting Chairs in advance to have their gate pass extended through Friday.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between the Einstein Coefficients
    Relations between the Einstein coefficients • Additional reading: Böhm-Vitense Ch 13.1, 13.2 • In thermodynamic equilibrium, transition rate (per unit time per unit volume) from level 1 to level 2 must equal transition rate from level 2 to level 1. • If the number density of atoms in level 1 is n1, and that in level 2 is n2, then !"#"$&̅ = !$($" + !$#$"&̅ ( /# ⟹ &̅ = $" $" !"/!$ #"$/#$" − 1 Compare mean intensity with Planck function • Use Boltzmann’s law to obtain the relative populations n1 and n2 in levels with energies E1 and E2: $ /( "̅ = %& %& )&(&%/)%(%& exp ℎ.//0 − 1 • In TE, mean intensity equals the Planck function, "̅ = (3 2ℎ.5/6% where ( 0 = 3 exp ℎ.//0 − 1 Einstein relations • To make mean intensity = Planck function, Einstein coefficients must satisfy the Einstein relations, 2ℎ)* !"#"$ = !$#$" & = # $" +$ $" • The Einstein relations: – Connect properties of the atom. Must hold even out of thermodynamic equilibrium. – Are examples of detailed balance relations connecting absorption and emission. – Allow determination of all the coefficients given the value of one of them. • We can write the emission and absorption coefficients jn, an etc in terms of the Einstein coefficients. Emission coefficient • Assume that the frequency dependence of radiation from spontaneous emission is the same as the line profile function f (n) governing absorption. • There are n2 atoms per unit volume. • Each transition gives a photon of energy hn0 , which is emitted into 4p steradians of solid angle. • Energy emitted from volume dV in time dt, into solid angle dW and frequency range dn is then: ℎ) !" = $ !&!Ω!(!) = - / 1())!&!Ω!(!) % 4, . .0 ℎ) ⟹ Emission coef>icient, $ = - / 1()) % 4, .
    [Show full text]
  • The Einstein's Coefficients and the Nature of Thermal
    EINSTEIN’S COEFFICIENTS AND THE NATURE OF THERMAL RADIO EMISSION Fedor V.Prigara Institute of Microelectronics and Informatics , Russian Academy of Sciences , 21 Universitetskaya , 150007 Yaroslavl , Russia The relations between Einstein’s coefficients for spontaneous and induced emission of radiation with account for the natural linewidth are obtained . It is shown that thermal radio emission is stimulated one . Thermal radio emission of non-uniform gas is considered . PACS numbers : 95.30.Gv , 42.50.Ar , 42.52.+x . The analysis of observational data on thermal radio emission from various astrophysical objects leads to the condition of emission implying the induced emission of radiation [5]. Here we show that the stimulated character of thermal radio emission follows from the relations between Einstein’s coefficients for spontaneous and induced emission of radiation . Consider two level system (atom or molecule ) with energy levels E1 and E 2 > E1 wich is in equilibrium with thermal blackbody radiation . We denote as ν s = A21 the number of transitions from the upper energy level to the lower one per unit time caused by a spontaneous emission of radiation with the frequency ω=(EE21− )/h, where h is the Planck constant . The number of transitions from the energy level E2 to the energy level E1 per unit time caused by a stimulated emission of radiation may be written in the form νi = BB21 ν ∆ν, (1) where 322 Bcν =−hωπ/ (21)(exp(hω/ kT) ) (2) is a blackbody emissivity (Planck’s function ) , T is the temperature , k is the Boltzmann constant , c is the speed of light , and ∆ν is the linewidth .
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulated Emission, Solid-State Quantum Electronics and Photonics: Relation to Composition, Structure and Size
    Romanian Reports in Physics, Vol. 57, No. 4, P. 845–872, 2005 OPTICS AND QUANTUM ELECTRONICS STIMULATED EMISSION, SOLID-STATE QUANTUM ELECTRONICS AND PHOTONICS: RELATION TO COMPOSITION, STRUCTURE AND SIZE I. URSU, V. LUPEI Laboratory of Solid-State Quantum Electronics, National Institute of Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics Bucharest-Romania (Received July 22, 2005) Abstract. The paper discusses the relation of the radiation emission properties of the doped photonic materials with the composition, structure and size of these materials. It is shown that a proper use of this relation can extend or improve the performances of the photon sources and of their applications. Key words: quantum electronics, stimulated emission, solid state lasers. 1. INTRODUCTION A problem of major concern for Einstein was the nature and properties of radiation. The first of the major papers published by Einstein in annus mirabilis 1905 was “Uber einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristichen Gesichtspunkt” (“On a heuristic point of view about the creation and conversion of light”), Ann. der Physik 17, 132 (1905). This paper, which is frequently referred to as the paper on the photoelectric effect, is a crucial contribution to the knowledge of the properties of radiation. It extends the work of Planck on the emission of energy quanta by showing that the electromagnetic field of light is in itself composed of energy quanta related to the frequency of light, which have been subsequently named photons; these quanta move without being divided and can be absorbed and emitted only as a whole. With this theory he could explain consistently the characteristics of the photoelectric effect, particularly the dependence of the number of released electrons, but not of their energy, on the intensity of the incident light, while the energy of released electrons is, above a given threshold, related to the frequency of the incident light.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein, Sutherland, Atoms, and Brownian Motion How the Mass
    How the mass movement of trillions of atoms changed the world Einstein, Sutherland, Atoms, and Brownian motion Bruce H J McKellar 15th July 2005 Thanks to David Jamieson, Rod Holme, Hector Giacomini Please feel this cup of coffee, and remember how hot it is 1905 Citation Count (World of Science, Dec. 2004) A. Einstein, Annalen der Photoelectric Effect 325 Physik 17, 132 (1905) A. Einstein, Annalen der Brownian Motion 1368 Physik 17, 549 (1905) A. Einstein, Annalen der Special Relativity 664 Physik 17, 891 (1905) A. Einstein, Annalen der E = mc2 91 Physik 18, 639 (1905) A. Einstein, Annalen der Molecular Size 1447 Physik 19, 289 (1906) (Einstein’s Thesis Work thesis) Einstein’s thesis is his most cited paper!! Brownian motion is next We know that matter is made of atoms, and we can see them This is an image of silicon atoms arranged on But 100 years ago a face of a crystal. It is impossible to "see" there were still atoms this way using ordinary light. The image was made by a Scanning Tunneling important reasons Microscope, a device that "feels" the cloud of electrons that form the outer surface of to doubt the atoms, rather as a phonograph needle feels existence of atoms the grooves in a record. http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/atoms.htm22/6/2005 01:33:19 The philosophical reasoning • Solids, fluids, particulates, ...... The Chemists 200 years ago Dalton had shown that atoms allowed an improved understanding of chemical reactions — these ideas were further developed and enhanced in the 19th Century. By 1905 most chemists thought atoms were very convenient, but they could have done without them if necessary.
    [Show full text]