DOCSLIB.ORG

THE ESTABLISHMENT of KEMALIST AUTOCRACY and ITS REFORM POLICIES in TURKEY by GAZI DOGAN BA, University of Ankara, 2001 MA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE ESTABLISHMENT of KEMALIST AUTOCRACY and ITS REFORM POLICIES in TURKEY by GAZI DOGAN BA, University of Ankara, 2001 MA THE ESTABLISHMENT OF KEMALIST AUTOCRACY AND ITS REFORM POLICIES IN TURKEY by GAZI DOGAN B.A., University of Ankara, 2001 M.A., University of Ankara, 2004 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2016 Abstract Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who was a nationalist leader and founder and first president of the republic of Turkey, still remains an important figure in the Turkish political and social landscape. Kemalist historiography, which is based on Mustafa Kemal’s six-day speech (Nutuk) in October 1927, emphasizes the foundation of the Republic as central to Turkish history. While this historiography emphasizes that Mustafa Kemal had an explicit plan during his modernization efforts, this dissertation will cover how Mustafa Kemal was incoherent in his actions and changed his discourses over and over again during the change of the political structure of Turkey. Beyond that, this study will suggest that Mustafa Kemal was an opportunist and pragmatist who utilized every single event to establish a Jacobin style autocracy. This research will discuss how Mustafa Kemal succeeded in using every opportunity, such as the Law of Supreme Commander Act in August 1921, the abolition of Sultanate in 1922, the establishment of Republic in 1923, the abolition of Caliphate in 1924, and the elimination of opposition in 1925, to establish his personal autocracy. In particular, the records of Assembly debates, not sufficiently used by Turkish historians, will be helpful to understand the creation of this personal autocracy. While Kemalist historiography credits Mustafa Kemal Ataturk with the original and unique conception of the social, legal, and educational reforms of the early Republican period, this dissertation argues that this approach is not balanced. Although the Kemalist historiography asserts that Mustafa Kemal and his legacy represent carrying out Enlightenment ideals in an obsolete society almost totally ignorant of these principles, the Kemalist modernization got a great inheritance from its predecessors, the Young Turks. Therefore, the Kemalist overstatement of an idealist figure of Mustafa Kemal is wrong in some degree. This dissertation aims to scrutinize the contribution of the Ottoman reformers and contradictions, mistakes, and overstatements of the Kemalist modernization project in social, legal, and educational areas by the help of wide primary sources which include official reports of the Grand National Assembly, the Republican Era archives and a mass of periodicals which were published in 1920s in Turkey. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF KEMALIST AUTOCRACY AND ITS REFORM POLICIES IN TURKEY by GAZI DOGAN B.A., University of Ankara, 2001 M.A., University of Ankara, 2004 A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2016 Approved by: Approved by: Co-Major Professor Co-Major Professor David Stone Michael Krysko Copyright GAZI DOGAN 2016 Abstract Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who was a nationalist leader and founder and first president of the republic of Turkey, still remains an important figure in the Turkish political and social landscape. Kemalist historiography, which is based on Mustafa Kemal’s six-day speech (Nutuk) in October 1927, emphasizes the foundation of the Republic as central to Turkish history. While this historiography emphasizes that Mustafa Kemal had an explicit plan during his modernization efforts, this dissertation will cover how Mustafa Kemal was incoherent in his actions and changed his discourses over and over again during the change of the political structure of Turkey. Beyond that, this study will suggest that Mustafa Kemal was an opportunist and pragmatist who utilized every single event to establish a Jacobin style autocracy. This research will discuss how Mustafa Kemal succeeded in using every opportunity, such as the Law of Supreme Commander Act in August 1921, the abolition of Sultanate in 1922, the establishment of Republic in 1923, the abolition of Caliphate in 1924, and the elimination of opposition in 1925, to establish his personal autocracy. In particular, the records of Assembly debates, not sufficiently used by Turkish historians, will be helpful to understand the creation of this personal autocracy. While Kemalist historiography credits Mustafa Kemal Ataturk with the original and unique conception of the social, legal, and educational reforms of the early Republican period, this dissertation argues that this approach is not balanced. Although the Kemalist historiography asserts that Mustafa Kemal and his legacy represent carrying out Enlightenment ideals in an obsolete society almost totally ignorant of these principles, the Kemalist modernization got a great inheritance from its predecessors, the Young Turks. Therefore, the Kemalist overstatement of an idealist figure of Mustafa Kemal is wrong in some degree. This dissertation aims to scrutinize the contribution of the Ottoman reformers and contradictions, mistakes, and overstatements of the Kemalist modernization project in social, legal, and educational areas by the help of wide primary sources which include official reports of the Grand National Assembly, the Republican Era archives and a mass of periodicals which were published in 1920s in Turkey. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... xiiii Dedication ................................................................................................................................. xiviv Chapter 1 - Introduction: The Establishment of Kemalist Autocracy and its Reform Policies in Turkey……………………...…………………………………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 2- The Establishment of Kemalist Autocracy in Turkey……………..…………….….…31 2.1 Unity of Powers and the Supreme Commander Act of 1921: First Attempt to the Autocracy ………………………………………………………………………………………..40 2.2 Abolition of the Ottoman Sultanate …………………………………………………..64 2.2.1 The Ottoman Empire and Kemalists’ Loyalty to the Sultan at the First Stage of the Turkish War of Independence: A Captive Sultan ………………………….65 2.2.2 First Reactions Against to the Personality of the Sultan: A Coward Sultan who was the Puppet of the Invaders …………………………………………………...71 2.2.3 Strong Reactions to the Personality of the Sultan: A Traitor and Degenerated Sultan …………………………………………………………………………….73 2.2.4 End of the Sultanate ………………………………………………………..77 2.2.5 After the Abolition of the Sultanate ………………………………………..87 2.3 The Establishment of the Turkish Republic ……………………………………….....91 2.3.1 Towards to the Republic ……………………………………………….….93 2.3.2 Kemalist “Fait Accompli”: The Cabinet Crisis ………………………….....99 2.3.3 Birth of the Republic ………………………………………………….......101 2.3.4 After the Establishment of the Turkish Republic …………………………105 2.4 Abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate in March 1924 ………………………………...114 2.4.1 Historical Background of the Caliphate and the Ottoman Caliphate ……...115 viii 2.4.2 Kemalist Approach to the Office of Caliphate during the Turkish War of Independence …………………………………………………………………...117 2.4.3 Establishing a Caliphate without Temporal Power: The End of Sultanate and the Last Caliph ………………………………………………………………….119 2.4.4 Struggle between Ankara and Istanbul: Last Caliph as a Powerhouse for the Opposition ……………………………………………………………………...121 2.4.5 Letter Crisis and the Kemalist Reaction …………………………………..129 2.4.6 Kemalist Objections to Attitudes of Caliph Abdulmecid: The Budget Crisis and the First Kemalist Attack to the Caliphate ………………………………….133 2.4.7 Abolition of the Caliphate ………………………………………………...138 2.4.8 After the Abolition of the Caliphate ………………………………………145 2.4.9 Efforts for the Revival of the Caliphate and Kemalist Turkey …………….149 2.5 Sheikh Said Rebellion of 1925 and the Elimination of First Opposition Party ……...153 2.5.1 Kurdish People and Their Support to the Turkish War of Independence ….158 2.5.2 Kemalist Policies towards to the Kurdish People after the War of Independence ……………………………………………………………….......164 2.5.3 Sheikh Said Rebellion of 1925 ……………………………………………165 2.5.4 Takrir-i Sukun Kanunu (Law on the Maintenance of Order) and Elimination of the Opposition Party …………………………………………………………175 2.5.5 Cult of Personality of Mustafa Kemal after the Establishment of the Kemalist Autocracy ………………………………………………………………………184 Chapter 3- Kemalist Reforms in Social and Legal Structure of Turkey…………………………191 3.1 The Dress Code: The Hat Law of 1925 ……………………………………………..193 ix 3.1.1 The Headdress Reform in the Ottoman Empire before the Hat Law ………195 3.1.2 Reasons of Religious and Cultural Objections to a Headdress Reform .......198 3.1.3 First Kemalist Initiatives to Convince People to Headdress Reform ……...201 3.1.4 Mustafa Kemal as a Role Model during the Headdress Reform …………..202 3.1.5 The Hat Law of 1925 ……………………………………………………...209 3.1.6 Implementation of the Hat Law and Protests against the Reform …………214 3.2 Closing Down the Dervish Lodges …………………………………………………222 3.2.1 Kemalist Reasons Behind the Closure of Dervish Lodges ………………..225 3.2.2 First Kemalist Initiatives against to Dervish Lodges and their Closure …...226 3.2.3 Debates in the GNA and the Implementation of Penal Sanctions towards Members of Dervish Lodges ……………………………………………………229 3.3 Legal Reforms: Accepting the Swiss Code
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perceptionsjournal of International Affairs
    PERCEPTIONSJOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS PERCEPTIONS Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX Number 2-3 XX Number 2015 Volume Summer-Autumn PERCEPTIONS The Great War and the Ottoman Empire: Origins Ayşegül SEVER and Nuray BOZBORA Redefining the First World War within the Context of Clausewitz’s “Absolute War” Dystopia Burak GÜLBOY Unionist Failure to Stay out of the War in October-November 1914 Feroz AHMAD Austro-Ottoman Relations and the Origins of World War One, 1912-14: A Reinterpretation Gül TOKAY Ottoman Military Reforms on the eve of World War I Odile MOREAU The First World War in Contemporary Russian Histography - New Areas of Research Iskander GILYAZOV Summer-Autumn 2015 Volume XX - Number 2-3 ISSN 1300-8641 PERCEPTIONS Editor in Chief Ali Resul Usul Deputy Editor Birgül Demirtaş Managing Editor Engin Karaca Book Review Editor İbrahim Kaya English Language and Copy Editor Julie Ann Matthews Aydınlı International Advisory Board Bülent Aras Mustafa Kibaroğlu Gülnur Aybet Talha Köse Ersel Aydınlı Mesut Özcan Florian Bieber Thomas Risse Pınar Bilgin Lee Hee Soo David Chandler Oktay Tanrısever Burhanettin Duran Jang Ji Hyang Maria Todorova Ahmet İçduygu Ole Wæver Ekrem Karakoç Jaap de Wilde Şaban Kardaş Richard Whitman Fuat Keyman Nuri Yurdusev Homepage: http://www.sam.gov.tr The Center for Strategic Research (Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi- SAM) conducts research on Turkish foreign policy, regional studies and international relations, and makes scholarly and scientific assessments of relevant issues. It is a consultative body of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs providing strategic insights, independent data and analysis to decision makers in government. As a nonprofit organization, SAM is chartered by law and has been active since May 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadism: Online Discourses and Representations
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC-ND 4.0 1 Studying Jihadism 2 3 4 5 6 Volume 2 7 8 9 10 11 Edited by Rüdiger Lohlker 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 The volumes of this series are peer-reviewed. 37 38 Editorial Board: Farhad Khosrokhavar (Paris), Hans Kippenberg 39 (Erfurt), Alex P. Schmid (Vienna), Roberto Tottoli (Naples) 40 41 Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC-ND 4.0 1 Rüdiger Lohlker (ed.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jihadism: Online Discourses and 8 9 Representations 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 With many figures 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 & 37 V R unipress 38 39 Vienna University Press 40 41 Open-Access-Publikation im Sinne der CC-Lizenz BY-NC-ND 4.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; 24 detailed bibliographic data are available online: http://dnb.d-nb.de.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD WAR I Goes Mad the BACKSTORY: the OTTOMAN EMPIRE
    The World WORLD WAR I Goes Mad THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE • By the beginning of the 20th century, the Ottoman Empire had begun to disintegrate under a variety of internal and external pressures. • In their move to join the modern world by becoming a nation-state, ethnic nationalism emerged as a rallying cry to define the “new” Turkey. Becoming Evil–p. 54 THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE • A series of Ottoman military disasters between 1908-1912, leads to Turkey being seized by an ultra- nationalistic, militaristic, and chauvinistic leadership. Becoming Evil–p. 55 THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE . Within a period of 2 weeks, the Ottomans lose 75% of their European territories. Greeks, Serbs, and Bulgarians revolted and broke away from the empire. It’s an ass whooping. This is the first major military defeat from former subject states the empire had to face. Leads to a real fear of collapse. They need to keep what they have left at all costs—they will now justify everything to do so. The Armenian Genocide Video THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE • In 1912, while Turkish Nationalism was growing, Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria broke away and expelled their former Turkish masters. THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE . 100,000 refugees flood into Constantinople . Nowhere to put them . Horror stories about what “the Christians” had done to them . Feeds into the story that “Christians are out to get the Muslims” . Desire for revenge begins to grow THE BACKSTORY: THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE In the wake of this disaster, a new political power rises in Turkey: .
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Reign of Terror'
    ‘A Reign of Terror’ CUP Rule in Diyarbekir Province, 1913-1923 Uğur Ü. Üngör University of Amsterdam, Department of History Master’s thesis ‘Holocaust and Genocide Studies’ June 2005 ‘A Reign of Terror’ CUP Rule in Diyarbekir Province, 1913-1923 Uğur Ü. Üngör University of Amsterdam Department of History Master’s thesis ‘Holocaust and Genocide Studies’ Supervisors: Prof. Johannes Houwink ten Cate, Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies Dr. Karel Berkhoff, Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies June 2005 2 Contents Preface 4 Introduction 6 1 ‘Turkey for the Turks’, 1913-1914 10 1.1 Crises in the Ottoman Empire 10 1.2 ‘Nationalization’ of the population 17 1.3 Diyarbekir province before World War I 21 1.4 Social relations between the groups 26 2 Persecution of Christian communities, 1915 33 2.1 Mobilization and war 33 2.2 The ‘reign of terror’ begins 39 2.3 ‘Burn, destroy, kill’ 48 2.4 Center and periphery 63 2.5 Widening and narrowing scopes of persecution 73 3 Deportations of Kurds and settlement of Muslims, 1916-1917 78 3.1 Deportations of Kurds, 1916 81 3.2 Settlement of Muslims, 1917 92 3.3 The aftermath of the war, 1918 95 3.4 The Kemalists take control, 1919-1923 101 4 Conclusion 110 Bibliography 116 Appendix 1: DH.ŞFR 64/39 130 Appendix 2: DH.ŞFR 87/40 132 Appendix 3: DH.ŞFR 86/45 134 Appendix 4: Family tree of Y.A. 136 Maps 138 3 Preface A little less than two decades ago, in my childhood, I became fascinated with violence, whether it was children bullying each other in school, fathers beating up their daughters for sneaking out on a date, or the omnipresent racism that I did not understand at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Mirrors of Modernization: the American Reflection in Turkey
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2014 Mirrors of Modernization: The American Reflection in urkT ey Begum Adalet University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Adalet, Begum, "Mirrors of Modernization: The American Reflection in urkT ey" (2014). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1186. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1186 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1186 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mirrors of Modernization: The American Reflection in urkT ey Abstract This project documents otherwise neglected dimensions entailed in the assemblage and implementations of political theories, namely their fabrication through encounters with their material, local, and affective constituents. Rather than emanating from the West and migrating to their venues of application, social scientific theories are fashioned in particular sites where political relations can be staged and worked upon. Such was the case with modernization theory, which prevailed in official and academic circles in the United States during the early phases of the Cold War. The theory bore its imprint on a series of developmental and infrastructural projects in Turkey, the beneficiary of Marshall Plan funds and academic exchange programs and one of the theory's most important models. The manuscript scrutinizes the corresponding sites of elaboration for the key indices of modernization: the capacity for empathy, mobility, and hospitality. In the case of Turkey the sites included survey research, the implementation of a highway network, and the expansion of the tourism industry through landmarks such as the Istanbul Hilton Hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Lewis 1749.Indd
    GEOFFREY LEWIS Geoffrey Lewis Lewis 1920–2008 I. Life PROFESSOR GEOFFREY LEWIS LEWIS, a pioneer in Turkish Studies in Britain and an internationally admired scholar in the fi eld, was born in London on 19 June 1920. He received his schooling at University College School in Hampstead, following which, in 1938, he went up to St John’s College Oxford to read Classics. Having sat Honour Moderations in the spring of 1940, he joined the Royal Air Force in September of that year and served until 1945: he qualifi ed for his BA by War Decree and subsequently received his MA in 1945. At some point during his study for Honour Mods, his Latin tutor, sensing that he was getting stale, suggested that he take up Turkish as a hobby—it seems that the choice of Turkish came to him on the spur of the moment. Geoffrey took it seriously, however, and the opportunity to act on it came when he was posted to Egypt as a radar operator. He made contact with an elderly Turk in Alexandria, through whom, and through the painstaking comparison of classic English texts with their Turkish translations—these culled from the bookshops of London and sent to him by his wife, Raphaela, whom he had married in 1941—he taught him- self Turkish. Returning to Oxford in 1945, and by now wholly won over to Turkish, he consulted the Laudian Professor of Arabic, [Sir] Hamilton Gibb, FBA, who welcomed the prospect of expanding the curriculum in Oriental Studies to include Turkish but recommended that Geoffrey read for the BA in Arabic and Persian as essential background to the serious study of Turkish historically as well as in its modern form.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Bildirileri 2.Bölüm
    “Go'ro'g'li” Dostonlarida Badiiy San'atlar (“Yunus Va Misqol Pari” Dostoni Misolida) Rahmatulla Barakaеv* Özet Köroğlu destanları halk dili güzelliklerinin çeşitli şekillerde gelişip Özbek folklorunun bunun gibi şekiller mazmunlar ve bercesteler örneklerinden birisidir. Onlarda bedii sanatları kullanış mahareti ve becerisi bahşılar repertuarının kendine özgülüklerini belgelemede mühim bir yere ve öneme sahiptir. Rahmetulla Yusuf oğlından derlenen “Yusuf ve Miskal peri” destanını bedi sanatlar açısından öğreniş bir yönden epik esaslarda geleneksellik ve kendine özgülükleri ispatlayışa hizmet etse diğer taraftan da bahşinin bedii hüner ve yetkinliğinin çeşitli farklılıklarını ve ayrıcalıklarını keşfetmeye, ortaya çıkarmaya yardımcı olur. Makalede Köroğlu Destanlarında benzetme, abartma, tekrar gibi bedii sanatlar, “Yusuf ve Miskal peri” Destanında yer alan bedii sanatlar açısından karşılaştırılacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Köroğlu destanları, Özbek folklori, bedii sanatlar, bedii tasvir vasıtası, mümtaz edebiyat. Comparison of Artistic Skills in Koroglu and Younus and Miskal Fairy Epic Posts Abstract The artistic moves forvard the proficiency of bakhshi (folklore post and singer) in using in the epic posts of “Koroglu” such artistic skills as assimilation, exaggeration and repetition by analizing the epic posts “Younus and Miskal fairy” and makes definits conclusions about the influense of belles-lettres and folk on the works of bakhshi. Key Words: Epic posts of “Koroglu”, Uzbek folklore, artistic skills, methods (instruments) of artistic description, classic literature. * Doç. Dr., Özbekistan Til Ve Adabiyat Institutu,Taşkent, Özbekistan. 163 Rahmatulla Barakaеv Har qanday badiiy asar,1 jumladan, xalq og'zaki ijodi namunalari ham, so'z san'ati vositasida badiiy bеzakka yo'g'rilgan ijod namunasi hisoblanadi. Binobarin, asar badiiyati asardagi barcha badiiy tasviriy vositalar uyg'unligidan iborat.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabiha Gökçen's 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO ―Sabiha Gökçen‘s 80-Year-Old Secret‖: Kemalist Nation Formation and the Ottoman Armenians A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Communication by Fatma Ulgen Committee in charge: Professor Robert Horwitz, Chair Professor Ivan Evans Professor Gary Fields Professor Daniel Hallin Professor Hasan Kayalı Copyright Fatma Ulgen, 2010 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Fatma Ulgen is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For my mother and father, without whom there would be no life, no love, no light, and for Hrant Dink (15 September 1954 - 19 January 2007 iv EPIGRAPH ―In the summertime, we would go on the roof…Sit there and look at the stars…You could reach the stars there…Over here, you can‘t.‖ Haydanus Peterson, a survivor of the Armenian Genocide, reminiscing about the old country [Moush, Turkey] in Fresno, California 72 years later. Courtesy of the Zoryan Institute Oral History Archive v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page……………………………………………………………....
    [Show full text]
  • Tire Müzesinden Bir Grup Fibula a Group of Fibulae from Tire Museum
    ISSN: 2651-4664 Arkhaia Anatolika Anadolu Arkeolojisi Araştırmaları Dergisi The Journal of Anatolian Archaeological Studies Volume 3 (2020) Tire Müzesinden Bir Grup Fibula A Group of Fibulae from Tire Museum Emre ERDAN ORCID: 0000-0002-4389-2016 Geliş Tarihi: 13.03.2020 | Kabul Tarihi: 25.03.2020 | Online Yayın Tarihi: 02.04.2020 Makale Künyesi: E. Erdan, “Tire Müzesinden Bir Grup Fibula”, Arkhaia Anatolika 3 (2020), 60-81. DOI: 10.32949/Arkhaia.2020.15 Arkhaia Anatolika, Anadolu Arkeolojisi Araştırmaları Dergisi “Açık Erişimli” (Open Access) bir dergidir. Kullanıcılar, dergide yayınlanan makalelerin tamamını tam metin olarak okuyabilir, indirebilir, makalelerin çıktısını alabilir ve kaynak göstermek suretiyle bilimsel çalışmalarında bu makalelerden faydalanabilir. Bunun için yayıncıdan ve yazar(lar)dan izin almasına gerek yoktur. Dergide yayınlanan makalelerin bilimsel ve hukuki sorumluluğu tamamen yazar(lar)ına aittir. Arkhaia Anatolika, The Journal of Anatolian Archaeological Studies follows Open Access as a publishing model. This model provides immediate, worldwide, barrier-free access to the full text of research articles without requiring a subscription to the articles published in this journal. Published material is freely available to all interested online readers. The scientific and legal propriety of the articles published in the journal belongs exclusively to the author(s). ISSN: 2651-4664 arkhaiaanatolika.org Arkhaia Anatolika 3 (2020) 60-81 DOI: 10.32949/Arkhaia.2020.15 Arkhaia Anatolika Tire Müzesinden Bir Grup Fibula A Group of Fibulae from Tire Museum Emre ERDAN Öz Fibulalar Geç Tunç Çağı sonlarında kullanılmaya başlanmış önemli bir eser grubudur. Farklı coğrafyalarda aynı anda kullanımına rastlanılan fibulaların ortaya çıkış süreci ile bilgilerimiz net olmamakla birlikte yapılan çalışmalar Yakın Doğu ya da Avrupa’yı fibula kullanımının başlangıç noktası olarak işaret etmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE)
    International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE) January 2016 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 ISSN 1309-6249 http://ijonte.org International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications January 2016 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 ISSN 1309-6249 Contact Addresses Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya, Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü Teknik Okullar Ankara/Türkiye E. Mail: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Uğur Demiray, Anadolu Üniversitesi, İletişim Bilimleri Fakültesi, Yunusemre Kampüsü, 26470 Eskişehir/Türkiye E. Mail: [email protected] Phone: +905422322167 Abstracting & Indexing International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (IJONTE) is currently indexed, abstracted and listed starting with the first issue in: i Copyright © International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications January 2016 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 ISSN 1309-6249 Sponsors ii Copyright © International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications / www.ijonte.org International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications January 2016 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 ISSN 1309-6249 Editors Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya, Gazi University- Turkey Prof. Dr. Ugur Demiray, Anadolu University- Turkey Associate Editors Assoc. Prof. Dr. Beyhan Zabun, Gazi University- Turkey Assist. Prof. Dr. Ilknur Istifci, Anadolu University- Turkey Dr. Nazan Dogruer, Eastern Mediterranean University- TRNC Dr. Ramadan Eyyam, Eastern Mediterranean University- TRNC Dr. Ufuk Tanyeri, Ankara University- Turkey Assistant Editor Ipek Menevis, Eastern Mediterranean University- TRNC Editorial Board Prof. Dr. Ali H. Raddaoui, University of Sfax- Tunisia Prof. Dr. Abdul Hakim Juri, University of Kuala Lumpur- Malaysia Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Bibliography
    Turkish Bibliography Reference Grammars Deny, J. 1921. Grammaire de la langue turque. Ernest Leroux, Paris. von Gabain, Annette. 1974. Alttürkische Grammatik. Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. Golstein, B. 1997. Grammaire du turc. L’Harmattan, Paris. Halasi-Kun, T. 1916. Türkische Grammatik. Sammlung Göschen, Berlin. Kissling, Hans-Joachim. 1960. Osmanish-türkische Grammatik. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden. Kononov, A.N. 1956. Grammatika sovremennogo tureckogo literaturnogo jazyka. Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow. Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. Routledge, London. Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Németh, J. 1962. Turkish grammar. Mouton, The Hague. [bew. van Halasi-Kun 1916] Swift, Lloyd B. 1963. A reference grammar of Modern Turkish. Indiana University Publications, Bloomington. Underhill, Robert. 1976. Turkish grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge. Vaughan, Thomas. 1709. A grammar of the Turkish language. J. Humfreys, London. [facsimile edition: Menston, 1968] Monographs and Dissertations Adamovic, Milan. 1985. Konjugationsgeschichte der Türkischen Sprache. E.J. Brill, Leiden. Aygen, Gülşat. 2002. Finiteness, case, and clausal architecture. Dissertation, Harvard University. Dietrich, Ayşe Pamir. 1997. Towards a syntactic characterization of passives, ergatives and middles in Russian and Turkish. Dissertation, Cornell University. Erguvanlı, Eser Ermine. 1984. The function of word order in Turkish grammar. University of California Press, Berkeley. Erkü, Feride. 1983. Discourse pragmatics and word order in Turkish. Dissertation, University of Minnesota. Foster, Joseph F. 1970. On some phonological rules of Turkish. Dissertation, University of Illinois. Göksel, Aslı. 1993. Levels of representation and argument structure in Turkish. Dissertation, University of London. Johanson, Lars. 1971. Aspekt im Türkischen: Vorstudien zu einer Beschreibung des türkeitürkischen Aspektsystems. Almqvist och Wiksell, Stockholm. Kardeştuncer, Aino E. 1982. Theoretical implications of Turkish vowel harmony.
    [Show full text]
  • ALI KEMAL and the SABAH / PEYAM-I SABAH NEWSPAPER By
    LIBERAL CRITICISM TOWARD THE UNIONIST POLICIES DURING THE GREAT WAR: ALI KEMAL AND THE SABAH / PEYAM-I SABAH NEWSPAPER by ONUR ÇAKMUR Submitted to the Institute of Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University July 2018 © Onur Çakmur 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT LIBERAL CRITICISM TOWARD THE UNIONIST POLICIES DURING THE GREAT WAR: ALİ KEMAL AND THE SABAH / PEYAM-I SABAH NEWSPAPER ONUR ÇAKMUR Master of Arts in Turkish Studies, July 2018 Thesis Advisor: Assoc. Prof. Selçuk Akşin Somel Keywords: Ali Kemal; Armistice press; First World War; Liberal opposition; Sabah newspaper The First World War that lasted from 1914 to 1918 occupies an important place in Turkish History. However, in comparison with the Turkish War of Independence, Ottoman experience of the Great War remains a relatively under-researched area. The Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), which ruled the Ottoman Empire during the War, constituted a dictatorship and kept the opposition under strict censorship. During the armistice period, political pressure was lifted and the press became a platform for criticism about the wartime policies of the Unionists and its consequences. Therefore, this study primarily aims to analyze Sabah (from January 1920 onwards published as Peyam-ı Sabah), a leading newspaper of the opposition, with regard to its perspective on the War during the armistice period. The emphasis of the study will be on the editor-in- chief of the paper, Ali Kemal, an iconic figure of the period, who had been very influential especially in Sabah’s analyses regarding the War and the figures who were responsible in this debacle.
    [Show full text]