Agenda E M Nq.-,, North Lanarkshire Council Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agenda E M Nq.-,, North Lanarkshire Council Report AGENDA EMNQ.-,, 1 -. NORTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL REPORT To: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE Subject: PALACERIGG COUNTRY PARK ANIMAL COLLECTION. RATIONALISATION OF SPECIES From: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY MA1 NTAl NED SERVICES Date: 5‘h Dec 2005 Ref: BD/JT/CB 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The purpose of this report is to bring member’s attention to the need to rationalise the Palacerigg Country Park Animal Collection to conform fully with recent EC Directives, to achieve a more efficient and productive use of resources and to provide a more focussed and sustainable contribution to wildlife and animal conservation. 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Today, Palacerigg Animal Collection is composed principally of Scottish Rare Breeds farm livestock and several species of deer, together with a small number of carnivores and various species originally acquired during the 1980’s, when emphasis was placed on more exotic “Safari Park’ type animals. 2.2 The maintenance of the carnivores, birds of prey and the reindeer at Palacerigg requires the animal collection to be regularly inspected. It requires the implementation of a number of increasingly unsustainable working practices, and in recent years, European Council Directives have placed increasing restrictions and more onerous requirements on Zoos - e.g. to fund and undertake complex and detailed scientific research and wildlife conservation and education programmes and to breed the exotic species kept for re- introduction into the wild. 2.3 During this year’s Zoo Licence Inspection, the Inspector’s view was that these requirements were not realistically achievable at Palacerigg as the park was neither staffed nor financed at a level required to operate within the new Directives as an exotic animal zoo. For a number of years, many local authorities have been moving away from the maintenance and operation of such facilities. They have properly become the province of large, highly specialised and skilled charitable organisations, working to international wildlife conservation agendas. 2.4 It was strongly recommended that rationalisation be carried out at Palacerigg - to focus on the Park’s existing Rare Breed collection as a means to interpret and demonstrate the issues of wildlife conservation, rather than on the “Zoo” animals - and thereby to move out of the scope of the Zoo Licencing Act altogether. 2.5 Palacerigg is already a member of The Rare Breeds Survival Trust and maintains stock registered with the following Rare Breeds Societies: - I:\COMMITTEE\COMSERV\CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL SERVICES\I 8 JANUARY 2006\PCP ANIMAL COLLECTION 23.1 1.05.DOC The Eriskay Pony Society The North Ronaldsay Sheep Fellowship The Soay and Boreray Sheep Society The White Park Cattle Society The Shetland Cattle Breeders Association The Scots Grey Poultry Club The British Pig Association 3 PROPOSALS 3.1 It is proposed that in future, the park collection concentrates resources principally on the development and maintenance of the Rare Breeds Livestock Collection. 3.2 The species subject to the Licensing requirements such as owls, reindeer, silver fox, wildcats and pine marten will be gradually phased out by relocating existing stocks to more appropriate institutions. For the most part, these are also quite reclusive species that are difficult subjects for conservation interpretation purposes. 3.3. Benefits resulting from this course of action include: - Simplified and sustainable animal husbandry practices with all stock kept being appropriate to the Scottish climate and local ground conditions Positive and measurable contribution to the conservation of Rare Breeds by the breeding of registered livestock and a clearly defined and achievable theme for the collection . Eligibility for Palacerigg Country Park to apply for national accreditation as a “Rare Breeds Survival Trust Approved Conservation Centre” . It is not an unrealistic aspiration for Palacerigg to be the major Rare Breeds conservation location in Scotland within two years 4 RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Committee are asked to agree to the implementation of the above proposal. I:\COMMlTTEE\COMSERV\CULTURAL & RECREATIONAL SERVICES\I 8 JANUARY 2006\PCP ANIMAL COLLECTION 23.1 1.05.DOC .
Recommended publications
  • THE CROFTER, December 20131
    1 THE CROFTER, DECEMBER 20131 Scottish Crofting Federation THE CROFTER rooted in our communities The journal of the Scottish Crofting Federation, the only member-led organisation dedicated to the promotion of crofting and the largest association of small-scale food producers in the UK DECEMBER 2013 Number 101 Did the 2010 Questions on Scottish Act equalise availability of Government land sale policy OLLOWING THE Scottish Government's expressing an interest in the land, when, as crofting grants? decision to withdraw part of its Rosal the sales particulars were keen to point out, Fforest estate in Sutherland from communities were cleared from this land and open market sale after public criticism, the it is a deserted wilderness. ROFTING-SPECIFIC grants, SCF asked the government to examine its Putting this land on the market in this way is namely CCAGS and CHGS, policies on the sale of public land, community simply perpetuating a system of land ownership were expected to be extended to ownership and the creation of new crofts. concentrated into few hands, a system the C SCF chair Derek Flyn believes the Rosal Scottish people want to see changed.” owner-occupier crofters by virtue of the Crofting Reform (Scotland) Act 2010. case demonstrates some of the problems He continued “A great deal of effort and The former scheme provides grants caused by the manner in which the Forestry public money has been invested in reforming towards agricultural developments such Commission conducts the process of land crofting. The SG has pledged its commitment as sheds, barns, fencing and other sale. He said: “There is no surprise that to the crofting system and has legislated to permanent improvements; the latter local communities did not come forward Continued on page 3 towards the building of a croft house.
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA April 24, 2020 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes ............................................................................................................................................4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes .................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ............................................................................................. 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers .................................................................... 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ...................................................................................................................... 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers.................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure .............................................................................................................................. 30 PG05 – Scie nt if ic Spec ies Code .................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St.Kilda Soay Sheep & Mouse Projects
    ST. KILDA SOAY SHEEP & MOUSE PROJECTS: ANNUAL REPORT 2009 J.G. Pilkington 1, S.D. Albon 2, A. Bento 4, D. Beraldi 1, T. Black 1, E. Brown 6, D. Childs 6, T.H. Clutton-Brock 3, T. Coulson 4, M.J. Crawley 4, T. Ezard 4, P. Feulner 6, A. Graham 10 , J. Gratten 6, A. Hayward 1, S. Johnston 6, P. Korsten 1, L. Kruuk 1, A.F. McRae 9, B. Morgan 7, M. Morrissey 1, S. Morrissey 1, F. Pelletier 4, J.M. Pemberton 1, 6 6 8 9 10 1 M.R. Robinson , J. Slate , I.R. Stevenson , P. M. Visscher , K. Watt , A. Wilson , K. Wilson 5. 1Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen. 3Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge. 4Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College. 5Department of Biological Sciences, Lancaster University. 6 Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield. 7 Institute of Maths and Statistics, University of Kent at Canterbury. 8Sunadal Data Solutions, Edinburgh. 9Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia. 10 Institute of Immunity and Infection research, University of Edinburgh POPULATION OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 1 REPORTS ON COMPONENT STUDIES .................................................................................................................... 4 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Weather during population
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep & Goat Catalogue
    CIRENCESTER MARKET Rare, Native & Traditional Breeds Show & Sale of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs, Goats & Poultry SHEEP & GOAT CATALOGUE SATURDAY 4TH AUGUST 2018 SHOW TIMES Cotswold Sheep Show – Friday 3rd August 2018 at 5.00 p.m. Oxford Sandy & Black Pigs Show - Friday 3rd August 2018 at 4.30 p.m. SALE TIMES Poultry Sale - 10.00 a.m. Cotswold Sheep - 11.00 a.m. General Sheep - Follows Cotswold Sheep Sale Cattle - Follows Sheep Sale at Approx 12.45 p.m. Pigs - Follows Cattle Sale at Approx 1.45 p.m. Flowering Trees, Shrubs & Plants at Approx 12 noon. LIVESTOCK SALE CENTRE BIO-SECURITY MEASURES Purchasers are requested to wear clean footwear and clothes when attending the sale. All livestock vehicles should be fully cleaned and disinfected before coming to the Market Site. METHOD OF SALE All Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Pigs, Horses & Poultry will be sold in £’s (pounds) and strictly in catalogue order, unless any alteration is authorised and announced by the Auctioneers. All Poultry will be subject to 10% Buyers Premium. CONDITIONS OF SALE The sale is held subject to the Auctioneer's General terms and Conditions of Sale and to the Auction Conditions of Sale recommended for use at Markets by the Livestock Auctioneers Association. These Conditions will be displayed in full at the Sale Premises. CATALOGUE ENTRIES Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the descriptions are accurate no guarantee is given or implied. Buyers should note that lots may be withdrawn and other lots added prior to the sale day. Buyers are advised to contact the Auctioneers prior to the sale to confirm a particular lots inclusion since neither the Vendor nor the Auctioneers will be responsible for abortive expenses in respect of withdrawn lots.
    [Show full text]
  • Ewe Lamb in the Local Village Show Where Most of the Exhibits Were Taken from the Fields on the Day of the Show
    Cotswold Sheep Society Newsletter Registered Charity No. 1013326 ` Autumn 2011 Hampton Rise, 1 High Street, Meysey Hampton, Gloucestershire, GL7 5JW [email protected] www.cotswoldsheepsociety.co.uk Council Officers Chairman – Mr. Richard Mumford Vice-Chairman – Mr. Thomas Jackson Secretary - Mrs. Lucinda Foster Treasurer- Mrs. Lynne Parkes Council Members Mrs. M. Pursch, Mrs. C. Cunningham, The Hon. Mrs. A. Reid, Mr. R Leach, Mr. D. Cross. Mr. S. Parkes, Ms. D. Stanhope Editors –John Flanders, The Hon. Mrs. Angela Reid Pat Quinn and Joe Henson discussing the finer points of……….? EDITORIAL It seems not very long ago when I penned the last editorial, but as they say time marches on and we are already into Autumn, certainly down here in Wales the trees have shed many of their leaves, in fact some began in early September. In this edition I am delighted that Joe Henson has agreed to update his 1998 article on the Bemborough Flock and in particular his work with the establishment to the RBST. It really is fascinating reading and although I have been a member of the Society since 1996 I have learnt a huge amount particularly as one of my rams comes from the RASE flock and Joe‟s article fills in a number of gaps in my knowledge. As you will see in the AGM Report, Pat Quinn has stepped down as President and Robert Boodle has taken over that position with Judy Wilkie becoming Vice President. On a personal basis, I would like to thank Pat Quinn for her willing help in supplying articles for the Newsletter and the appointment of Judy Wilkie is a fitting tribute to someone who has worked tirelessly over many years for the Society – thank you and well done to you both.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    27 2000 ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES INFORMATION BULLETIN D’INFORMATION SUR LE RESSOURCES GÉNÉTIQUES ANIMALES BOLETIN DE INFORMACION SOBRE RECURSOS GENETICOS ANIMALES Food Organisation Organización and des de las Agriculture Nations Naciones Organization Unies Unidas of pour para la the l'alimentation Agricultura United et y la Nations l'agriculture Alimentatción Initiative for Initiative pour Iniciativa para Domestic la Diversité la Diversidad Animal des Animaux de los Animales Diversity Domestiques Domésticos The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Les appellations employées dans cette publication et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’ Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. Las denominaciones empleadas en esta publicación y la forma en que aparecen presentados los datos que contiene no implican, de parte de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades o zonas, o de sus autoridades, ni respecto de la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    "First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources" (SoWAnGR) Country Report of the United Kingdom to the FAO Prepared by the National Consultative Committee appointed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Contents: Executive Summary List of NCC Members 1 Assessing the state of agricultural biodiversity in the farm animal sector in the UK 1.1. Overview of UK agriculture. 1.2. Assessing the state of conservation of farm animal biological diversity. 1.3. Assessing the state of utilisation of farm animal genetic resources. 1.4. Identifying the major features and critical areas of AnGR conservation and utilisation. 1.5. Assessment of Animal Genetic Resources in the UK’s Overseas Territories 2. Analysing the changing demands on national livestock production & their implications for future national policies, strategies & programmes related to AnGR. 2.1. Reviewing past policies, strategies, programmes and management practices (as related to AnGR). 2.2. Analysing future demands and trends. 2.3. Discussion of alternative strategies in the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 2.4. Outlining future national policy, strategy and management plans for the conservation, use and development of AnGR. 3. Reviewing the state of national capacities & assessing future capacity building requirements. 3.1. Assessment of national capacities 4. Identifying national priorities for the conservation and utilisation of AnGR. 4.1. National cross-cutting priorities 4.2. National priorities among animal species, breeds,
    [Show full text]
  • St Kilda World Heritage Site Management Plan 2012–17 Title Sub-Title Foreword
    ST KILDA World Heritage Site Management Plan 2012–17 TITLE Sub-title FOREWORD We are delighted to be able to present the revised continuing programme of research and conservation. Management Plan for the St Kilda World Heritage Site The management of the World Heritage Site is, for the years 2012-2017. however, a collaborative approach also involving partners from Historic Scotland, Scottish Natural St Kilda is a truly unique place. The spectacular Heritage, Comhairle nan Eilean Siar and the Ministry of scenery and wildlife, both on land and in the seas Defence. As custodians of St Kilda, all of the partners surrounding the islands, the archipelago’s isolation and should be thanked for their excellent work over recent inaccessibility, and the evidence, abundant for all to years, and the new Management Plan will continue to see, of the people that made these islands their home, build on these efforts. make St Kilda truly exceptional. The very nature of St Kilda means that the challenges In this respect, St Kilda showcases Scotland to the are different to those of other World Heritage Sites. world by displaying the most important features of our By identifying and addressing key short and medium heritage, our rich natural and cultural traditions, and our term issues around protection, conservation and awe inspiring landscapes and scenery. management, the Management Plan aims to embrace these challenges, and sets out a thirty year vision for the It is therefore of no surprise that St Kilda has been property, ensuring that the longer-term future of St Kilda designated as a World Heritage Site for both its cultural is properly considered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stoneleigh Herd
    HERD FEATURE THE STONELEIGH HERD The Stoneleigh Herd of Sussex cattle was founded in 2002, a year after Debbie Dann and Alan Hunt had bought the RASE’s herd of rare breed White Park Cattle. White Parks, for all their good looks and photogenic charm, are not the most commercial of breeds so they wanted a breed to complement the White Parks and that would pay the bills and ensure the cattle weren’t just a glorified hobby. After looking at a number of native breeds the selection was narrowed down to South Devons and Sussex (Debbie is originally from Hersmonceux in East Sussex). Sussex easily trumped the South Devons! The dispersal of Mike Cushing’s Coombe Ash Herd in May 2002 provided the ideal opportunity to buy some foundation cows and four cows with calves at foot and back in calf again found themselves travelling up the M40 to Warwickshire. Coombe Ash Godinton 5th, bought as a calf at foot from the Coombe Ash dispersal sale and her heifer calf summer 2013 Debbie’s day job at that time was to run all the competitive classes for the Royal Show and Alan was and still is the Estate Manager for the Royal Showground’s farmland. Since 2007 Debbie has been Breed Secretary for the Longhorn Cattle Society. This means that both Alan and Debbie have full time jobs and the cattle are mostly managed outside of work hours and have to be pretty low maintenance. Stoneleigh Godinton 2nd and calf Cows are housed over the winter as all the grazing is rented and the cattle are easier to manage when they are indoors when the owners are working full time.
    [Show full text]
  • Unworked Crofts in His Article in This Issue of the Crofter
    Scottish Crofting Federation THE CROFTER rooted in our communities SCF is the only organisation solely dedicated to campaigning for crofters and fighting for the future of crofting NOVEMBER 2017 Number 113 Conflict between two endangered species: crofters and geese © Martin Benson – Skye HE UISTS HAVE had a problem with wild population returns to its former numbers. crofters on the machair. And the geese seem to geese damaging crops and grazings for The barnacle population in Uist is escalating. be winning.” Tmany years now. Last year it was 4,000, this year 8,000, next SCF has been fighting for the control of wild The main culprit was the greylag but this is year? It has been predicted that if they are not geese on croft land for many years, with a petition now being overtaken by the Greenland barnacle controlled now, crofting will stop within 10 years. in the Scottish Parliament urging the government goose. The greylags were fairly well controlled in The repercussions will last for generations, to not cut the budget, and the goose issue being an adaptive management pilot scheme run by with some of Europe’s finest high nature value regularly brought to the Cross Party Group on SNH but, despite its success, the scheme has farmland, the esteemed machair habitat, being Crofting. This parliamentary group recently wrote closed. Was this a good investment of £294,858 left to degenerate. As SCF chair Russell Smith to cabinet secretary for environment Roseanna public money? Yes, if you look at the success; no, said recently, “We have a conflict between two if the scheme does not continue and the greylag endangered species – barnacle geese and ...Continued on page 3 Scottish upland sheep INSIDE THIS ISSUE • Crofting law support shenanigans consultation HE SCOTTISH UPLAND differential needed for those crofting to actual replacements.
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA February 12, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cattle Inheritance . I . Color'
    CATTLE INHERITANCE . I. COLOR' HEMAN L . IBSEN Kansas A gricdtural Experiment Station. Manhattan. Kansas Received January 31. 1933 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ......................... 442 COLORGENES ................................................................... 442 Red, R ....................................................................... 442 Black, B ..................................................................... 443 Black Spotting, Bs ............................................................ 443 Modifiers: much black, M, little black, L ....................................... 444 Brindle, Br .................................................................. 445 Intensity and dilution: I and i; D and d ....................................... 447 Self and recessive white spotting, S and s ........................................ 448 Modifiers of s: little white, Lw, much white, Zw ....................... ......... 449 pigmented leg, PI, unpigmented leg, pZ ............................ 449 Roan, N ..................................................................... 451 Roan modifier, rm .... .................................. 454 Recessive white (Nellore cattle), ?evz ............................................. 455 Dominant white (Park cattle), W'p ............................................. 457 Dominant white spotting ....................................................... 458 1 . Hereford pattern, SH...................................................... 458 Modifiers: little white, Lw,much white, Zm ..................................
    [Show full text]