DOCSLIB.ORG

Puerto Rico DR-4339-PR Agosto De 2020 Departamento De Seguridad Nacional De EE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Puerto Rico DR-4339-PR Agosto De 2020 Departamento De Seguridad Nacional De EE Evaluación Ambiental Programática Reparación, Remplazo y Reubicación de los Servicios Públicos Puerto Rico DR-4339-PR Agosto de 2020 Departamento de Seguridad Nacional de EE. UU. Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias Región II Oficina de Recuperación Conjunta de Puerto Rico 50 Carretera PR-165 Guaynabo, PR 00968 TABLA DE CONTENIDO TABLA DE CONTENIDO............................................................................................................. ii APÉNDICES.................................................................................................................................. iv TABLAS ........................................................................................................................................ iv ACRÓNIMOS Y ABREVIATURAS ............................................................................................. v 1.0 INTRODUCCIÓN .................................................................................................................... 9 2.0 PROPÓSITO Y NECESIDAD ............................................................................................... 10 3.0 LUGAR DE LOS PROYECTOS Y TRASFONDO ............................................................. 111 4.0 ALTERNATIVAS .................................................................................................................. 12 4.1 Alternativa 1: Alternativa de no acción ........................................................................................................ 12 4.2 Alternativa 2: Reparación, remplazo y actualización de servicios públicos.................................................. 13 4.3 Alternativa 3: Realinear o reubicar los servicios públicos ............................................................................ 17 4.4 Alternativa 4: Combinación de las alternativas ........................................................................................... 19 5.0 AMBIENTE AFECTADO Y POSIBLES IMPACTOS ......................................................... 20 5.1 GEOLOGÍA, TOPOGRAFÍA Y SUELOS ................................................................................................................ 221 5.1.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 221 5.1.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 22 5.2 CALIDAD DEL AIRE ............................................................................................................................................. 24 5.2.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 26 5.2.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 27 5.3 RECURSOS Y CALIDAD DEL AGUA....................................................................................................................... 29 5.3.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 30 5.3.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 34 5.4 HUMEDALES ...................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.4.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 36 5.4.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 37 5.5 VALLES DE INUNDACIÓN ................................................................................................................................... 38 5.5.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 39 5.5.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 39 5.6 RECURSOS COSTEROS ....................................................................................................................................... 41 5.6.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 42 5.6.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 43 5.7 VEGETACIÓN ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 5.7.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 44 5.7.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 45 5.8 PECES Y VIDA SILVESTRE .................................................................................................................................... 46 5.8.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 46 ii 5.8.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 47 5.9 ESPECIES AMENAZADAS O EN PELIGRO DE EXTINCIÓN ..................................................................................... 48 5.9.1 Condiciones actuales ................................................................................................................................. 49 5.9.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta ............................................................................................ 51 5.10 RECURSOS CULTURALES .................................................................................................................................. 53 5.10.1 Condiciones actuales - Estructuras históricas (aún erigidas) .................................................................. 54 5.10.2 Recursos arqueológicos ........................................................................................................................... 56 5.11 JUSTICIA AMBIENTAL ...................................................................................................................................... 58 5.11.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 59 5.11.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta .......................................................................................... 61 5.12 USO Y PLANIFICACIÓN DEL TERRENO .............................................................................................................. 63 5.12.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 63 5.12.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta .......................................................................................... 64 5.13 RUIDO .............................................................................................................................................................. 65 5.13.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 67 5.13.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta .......................................................................................... 67 5.14 TRANSPORTE ................................................................................................................................................... 68 5.14.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 68 5.14.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta .......................................................................................... 69 5.15 SERVICIOS PÚBLICOS ....................................................................................................................................... 70 5.15.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 70 5.15.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta .......................................................................................... 71 5.16 SALUD PÚBLICA Y SEGURIDAD ......................................................................................................................... 73 5.16.1 Condiciones actuales ............................................................................................................................... 73 5.16.2 Posibles impactos y la mitigación propuesta .......................................................................................... 74 5.17 MATERIALES PELIGROSOS ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12
    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish And
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/09/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-21232, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0040] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AZ79 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Agave eggersiana, Gonocalyx concolor, and Varronia rupicola AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), designate critical habitat for three Caribbean plants, Agave eggersiana (no common name), Gonocalyx concolor (no common name), and Varronia rupicola (no common name), under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, we are designating 1 approximately 50.6 acres (20.5 hectares) of critical habitat for A. eggersiana in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), 198 ac (80.1 ha) for G. concolor in Puerto Rico, and 6,547 ac (2,648 ha) for V. rupicola in southern Puerto Rico and Vieques Island. The effect of this regulation is to conserve habitat for these plants under the Act. DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF FEDERAL REGISTER PUBLICATION]. ADDRESSES: This final rule is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov and at the Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office. Comments and materials we received, as well as some supporting documentation we used in preparing this rule, are available for public inspection at http://www.regulations.gov. All of the comments, materials, and documentation that we considered in this rulemaking are available by appointment, during normal business hours at: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Gumbo Limbo Final Draft.Pub
    Stephen H. Brown, Horticulture Agent Bronwyn Mason, Master Gardener Lee County Extension, Fort Myers, Florida (239) 533-7513 [email protected] http://lee.ifas.ufl.edu/hort/GardenHome.shtml Botanical Name: Bursera simaruba Family: Burseraceae Common Names: Gumbo limbo, tourist tree, turpentine tree, almácigo Synonyms (Discarded names): Bursera elaphrium, B. pistacia Origin: South Florida, Bahamas, Carib- bean, Yucatan peninsula, Central America, Northern and Western South America U.S.D.A. Zone: 9B-11 (25°F minimum) Plant Type: Medium to large-sized tree Leaf Type: Pinnately compound Growth Rate: Fast Typical Dimensions: 25’-50’ x 25’-50’ Leaf Persistence: Briefly deciduous Flowering Season: Winter, spring Light Requirements: High Salt Tolerance: High Ft Myers Beach, Florida, late July Drought Tolerance: High Wind Tolerance: High Soil Requirements: Well-drained; wide variety of soil types including alkaline Nutritional Requirements: Low Environmental Problems: Weak branches Major Potential Pests: Croton scale, rugose spiraling whitefly Propagation: Seeds, cuttings Human Hazards: None Uses: Shade, parking lot island, specimen, streetscape, wildlife Natural Geographic Distribution Bursera is a genus of about 100 species in tropical America with gumbo limbo, B. simaruba, being one of the most wide- spread species. It is native along both coasts of Florida southwards from Pinellas County on the west and Brevard County on the east. The species is widespread throughout the Caribbean and the Baha- mas. Its continental range extends from the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico to Panama, Columbia, Venezuela, Guyana, and north- ern Brazil. Ft Myers, Florida Growth and Wood Characteristics Gumbo limbo is one of the fastest growing native trees. The growth is so rapid that a six- to eight-foot tree can be produced from seed in 18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Density of Cebus Imitator, Honduras
    Neotropical Primates 26(1), September 2020 47 POPULATION DENSITY ESTIMATE FOR THE WHITE-FACED CAPUCHIN MONKEY (CEBUS IMITATOR) IN THE MULTIPLE USE AREA MONTAÑA LA BOTIJA, CHOLUTECA, HONDURAS, AND A RANGE EXTENSION FOR THE SPECIES Eduardo José Pinel Ramos M.Sc. Biological Sciences, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Cra. 27 a # 67-14, barrio 7 de agosto, Bogotá D.C., e-mail: <[email protected]> Abstract Honduras is one of the Neotropical countries with the least amount of information available regarding the conservation status of its wild primate species. Understanding the real conservation status of these species is relevant, since they are of great importance for ecosystem dynamics due to the diverse ecological services they provide. However, there are many threats that endanger the conservation of these species in the country such as deforestation, illegal hunting, and illegal wild- life trafficking. The present research is the first official registration of the Central American white-faced capuchin monkey (Cebus imitator) for the Pacific slope in southern Honduras, increasing the range of its known distribution in the country. A preliminary population density estimate of the capuchin monkey was performed in the Multiple Use Area Montaña La Botija using the line transect method, resulting in a population density of 1.04 groups/km² and 4.96 ind/km² in the studied area. These results provide us with a first look at an isolated primate population that has never been described before and demonstrate the need to develop long-term studies to better understand the population dynamics, ecology, and behaviour, for this group in the zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Bursera Simaruba Seeds Subjected to Various Scarification Treatments Michael Morgan and Thomas W
    Germination Rates of Bursera simaruba Seeds Subjected to Various Scarification Treatments Michael Morgan and Thomas W. Zimmerman Agroforestry Research Specialist II, University of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station, Kingshill, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands; Research Associate Professor, Biotechnology and Agroforestry, University of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station, Kingshill, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands Abstract Tainos, also called Arawaks, were the people Columbus encountered on the Caribbean islands when he claimed the Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg. seed were subjected to five scari- Americas for Spain in 1492. fication treatments to determine their efficacy on subsequent germination. Seeds that were scarified with sandpaper had the Distribution and Characteristics highest mean germination, although it was not statistically different than the untreated control. Those treated with hot Bursera simaruba is native to northern South America and water had significantly lower germination than the control, the Caribbean Basin (Gibney 2004, Jones 1995, Kirk 2009, suggesting that temperatures may have been too hot. These Little and Wadsworth 1964). The species is abundant in results indicate that mechanical scarification may improve the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. It has also become germination of this species but that further research is needed naturalized in south Florida, but some discussion remains to refine treatments. regarding whether B. simaruba is an introduced species to Florida (Navarrete-Tindall and Orellana-Nuñez 2002, Introduction Nelson 1994). B. simaruba is very tolerant of salt, wind, and drought, making it well adapted to the semiarid Virgin Islands Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg., known as turpentine tree or environment. It is found close to the sea and on hilltops, and gumbo-limbo, is easily recognized by its reddish, papery it is native to limestone-derived soils (Kirk 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1
    ENH854 Low-Maintenance Landscape Plants for South Florida1 Jody Haynes, John McLaughlin, Laura Vasquez, Adrian Hunsberger2 Introduction regular watering, pruning, or spraying—to remain healthy and to maintain an acceptable aesthetic This publication was developed in response to quality. A low-maintenance plant has low fertilizer requests from participants in the Florida Yards & requirements and few pest and disease problems. In Neighborhoods (FYN) program in Miami-Dade addition, low-maintenance plants suitable for south County for a list of recommended landscape plants Florida must also be adapted to—or at least suitable for south Florida. The resulting list includes tolerate—our poor, alkaline, sand- or limestone-based over 350 low-maintenance plants. The following soils. information is included for each species: common name, scientific name, maximum size, growth rate An additional criterion for the plants on this list (vines only), light preference, salt tolerance, and was that they are not listed as being invasive by the other useful characteristics. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC, 2001), or restricted by any federal, state, or local laws Criteria (Burks, 2000). Miami-Dade County does have restrictions for planting certain species within 500 This section will describe the criteria by which feet of native habitats they are known to invade plants were selected. It is important to note, first, that (Miami-Dade County, 2001); caution statements are even the most drought-tolerant plants require provided for these species. watering during the establishment period. Although this period varies among species and site conditions, Both native and non-native species are included some general rules for container-grown plants have herein, with native plants denoted by †.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 204/Tuesday, October 22, 2013
    62560 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules * * * * * Processing, Attn: FWS–R4–ES–2013– existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) Dated: September 9, 2013. 0103; Division of Policy and Directives other natural or manmade factors Rachel Jacobson, Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife affecting its continued existence. Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish We have determined that listing is Wildlife and Parks. 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. warranted for these species, which are We request that you send comments currently at risk throughout all of their [FR Doc. 2013–24169 Filed 10–3–13; 8:45 am] only by the methods described above. respective ranges due to threats related BILLING CODE 4310–55–C We will post all comments on http:// to: www.regulations.gov. This generally • A. eggersiana—potential future DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR means that we will post any personal development for residential, urban, and information you provide us (see the tourist use; agriculture use; dropping of Fish and Wildlife Service Information Requested section below for debris; competing nonnative plants; more information). fires; predation; and disease cause by 50 CFR Part 17 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: insects (weevils). • [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0103; Marelisa Rivera, Deputy Field G. concolor—installation or 4500030113] Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife expansion of telecommunication towers, Service, Caribbean Ecological Services road improvement, vegetation RIN 1018–AZ10 Field Office, P.O. Box 491, Road 301 management, and small number of ´ individuals and populations. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Km. 5.1, Boqueron, PR 00622; by • V.
    [Show full text]
  • Bursera Simaruba (L.) Sarg. Almac?Igo Gumbo Limbo : Burseraceae, Bursera Family
    3ra simaruba (L.) Sarg. Almacigo, gumbo limbo SO-ITF-SM-35 October 1990 Burseraceae Bursera family John K. Francis monthly w&m mmn 'TPM * .J30. Bursera simaruba (L.) Sarg., known as almacigo (Spanish) can tolerate salt spray and some soil salinity (24). It is often and gumbo-limbo (English), also has more than 50 other found on elevated areas above beaches and on slight rises common names (11) and is a medium-sized tree of dry and just inland from coastal mangroves. The aspect and slope of moist forests in the Caribbean region. Its moderate size, sites do not appear to be very important factors affecting dis¬ compact crown, shiny green foliage, and brown, birchlike tribution (author, personal observation). Most almacigo trees bark have led to its use as an ornamental in many dry areas are found at low elevations in coastal areas (17); however, the (fig. 1). The wood is of low density but has a number of uses. tree also grows well inland in some areas and can be found at elevations of up to 1,800 m in Guatemala (24). HABITAT Associated Forest Cover Native Range Across its wide range, almacigo forms many associations. A few are listed below, beginning at the northern extent of The natural range of almacigo extends from southern the range and proceeding south. The upper Florida Keys Florida and the Bahamas through the Greater and Lesser commonly support Mastichodendron foetidissimum (Jacq.) Antilles and into northern South America (17,18), (fig. 2). It H.J. Lam., Metopium toxiferum (L.) Krug. & Urban, Lysiloma also grows on both coasts of central Mexico, through Central latisiliquum (L.) Benth., Chrysophyllum oliviforme L., Gym- America, and along the Pacific Coast of South America nanthes lucida Sw., and Guaiacum sanctum L.
    [Show full text]
  • Bursera Simaruba Family: Burseraceae Gumbo-Limbo Almácigo
    Bursera simaruba Family: Burseraceae Gumbo-Limbo Almácigo Other Common Names: Turpentine tree (Jamaica), Gommier blanc (Haiti), Chaca, Palo chino (Mexico), Carate ( Panama, Colombia), Caraña, Indio desnudo (Venezuela). Distribution: Of common occurrence in southern Florida, the West Indies, southern Mexico, Central America, and northern South America. The tree is not exactly as to site and moisture conditions but reaches its best development in lowland forests. On some sites it occurs as pure or nearly pure forests. The Tree: Generally a slender unbuttressed tree of short to medium height, commonly to 60 ft; diameters 14 to18 in. Sometimes attain heights of 80 to 90 ft with trunk diameters of 3 ft. The Wood: General Characteristics: Heartwood is white, yellowish, or light brown, not differentiated from sapwood. Texture is fine to medium; grain fairly straight to irregular; moderate to rather high luster; without distinctive taste or odor. Weight: Basic specific gravity (ovendry weight/green volume) 0.30 to 0.38; air-dry density reported to range from 19 to 30 pcf. Mechanical Properties: (2-in. standard.) Moisture content Bending strength Modulus of elasticity Maximum crushing strength (%) (Psi) (1,000 psi) (Psi) Green (46) 3,300 560 1,510 12% 4,800 740 3,080 12% (64) 5,560 1,080 NA Janka side hardness reported to be 270 lb air dry and 230 lb for green wood. Drying and Shrinkage: The wood air seasons rapidly with minor degrade in the form of very slight checking and warp. Logs and lumber are very susceptible to attack by sap-stain fungi, requiring rapid conversion and chemical control.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the International Palm Society Vol. 52(1) Mar. 2008 Essential Palm Palms:Essential Palm Palms 1/22/08 11:34 AM Page 1 the INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY, INC
    Palms Journal of the International Palm Society Vol. 52(1) Mar. 2008 Essential palm Palms:Essential palm Palms 1/22/08 11:34 AM Page 1 THE INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY, INC. The International Palm Society Palms (formerly PRINCIPES) Journal of The International Palm Society Founder: Dent Smith An illustrated, peer-reviewed quarterly devoted to The International Palm Society is a nonprofit corporation information about palms and published in March, engaged in the study of palms. The society is inter- June, September and December by The International national in scope with worldwide membership, and the Palm Society, 810 East 10th St., P.O. Box 1897, formation of regional or local chapters affiliated with the Lawrence, Kansas 66044-8897, USA. international society is encouraged. Please address all inquiries regarding membership or information about Editors: John Dransfield, Herbarium, Royal Botanic the society to The International Palm Society Inc., P.O. Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, United Box 1897, Lawrence, Kansas 66044-8897, USA. e-mail Kingdom, e-mail [email protected], tel. 44- [email protected], fax 785-843-1274. 20-8332-5225, Fax 44-20-8332-5278. Scott Zona, Fairchild Tropical Garden, 11935 Old OFFICERS: Cutler Road, Coral Gables, Miami, Florida 33156 President: Paul Craft, 16745 West Epson Drive, USA, e-mail [email protected], tel. 1-305- Loxahatchee, Florida 33470 USA, e-mail 669-4072, Fax 1-305-665-8032. [email protected], tel. 1-561-514-1837. Associate Editor: Natalie Uhl, 228 Plant Science, Vice-Presidents: John DeMott, 18455 SW 264 St, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA, e- Homestead, Florida 33031 USA, e-mail mail [email protected], tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Peperomia Wheeleri Britton (Wheeler’S Peperomia)
    Peperomia wheeleri Britton (Wheeler’s peperomia) Photo by: Carlos Pacheco, USFWS biologist, 2012 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office Boquerón, Puerto Rico 5-YEAR REVIEW Peperomia wheeleri (Wheeler’s peperomia) I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Methodology used to complete the review: On September 27, 2006, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) published a notice in the Federal Register (71 FR 56545) to announce the 5-year review of the plant Peperomia wheeleri, and requested new information concerning the biology and status of this species. A 60-day comment period was opened. No comments were received from the public during this period. When Peperomia wheeleri was originally listed, it was given no common name. However, Wheeler’s peperomia seems to be well accepted by the scientific community as its common name (Please refer to the “taxonomy” section in this document for more details). Therefore, we intend to use Wheeler’s peperomia as the common name for Peperomia wheeleri in this document and from this point forward. This 5-year review was prepared by the lead Service recovery biologist and summarizes information that the Service has gathered in the Wheeler’s peperomia file since the plant was listed on January 14, 1987. The sources of information used for this review included the original final listing rule for the species, the recovery plan for the species, peer-reviewed literature, personal communications with qualified biologists and experts on the species, and unpublished reports from field visits and recovery activities conducted by Service biologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Status for the Florida Bonneted Bat; Final Rule
    Vol. 78 Wednesday, No. 191 October 2, 2013 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the Florida Bonneted Bat; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:45 Oct 01, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\02OCR2.SGM 02OCR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 61004 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Listing a species as endangered or Previous Federal Actions threatened can only be completed by The Florida bonneted bat (Eumops Fish and Wildlife Service issuing a rule. On October 4, 2012, we floridanus) was previously known as the published a proposed rule to list the Florida mastiff bat (Eumops glaucinus 50 CFR Part 17 Florida bonneted bat as an endangered floridanus). [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2012–0078; species (77 FR 60750). After careful Federal actions for the Florida 4500030113] consideration of all public and peer bonneted bat prior to October 4, 2012, reviewer comments we received, we are are outlined in our proposed rule (77 FR RIN 1018–AY15 publishing this final rule to list the 60750), which was published on that Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Florida bonneted bat as an endangered date. Publication of the proposed rule and Plants; Endangered Species species. (77 FR 60750) opened a 60-day comment period, which closed on Status for the Florida Bonneted Bat The basis for our action. Under the December 3, 2012. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Act, a species may be determined to be Our proposed rule also included a Interior.
    [Show full text]