DOCSLIB.ORG

FEMA Utilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FEMA Utilities Programmatic Environmental Assessment Utility Repair, Replacement, and Realignment Commonwealth of Puerto Rico DR-4339-PR August 2020 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II Puerto Rico Joint Recovery Office 50 State Road 165 Guaynabo, PR 00968 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ ii APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................ 9 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................... 10 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Alternative 1: No Action Alternative ............................................................................................................ 11 4.2 Alternative 2: Repair, Replacement, and Upgrade of Utilities ..................................................................... 12 4.3 Alternative 3: Realignment or Relocation of Utilities ................................................................................... 15 4.4 Alternative 4: Combination of the Alternatives ............................................................................................ 17 5.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ........................................... 18 5.1 GEOLOGY, TOPOGRAPHY, AND SOILS ................................................................................................................ 19 5.1.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 19 5.1.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 20 5.2 AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 23 5.2.2 Potential Impacts and proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 24 5.3 WATER QUALITY/WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 26 5.3.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 27 5.3.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 30 5.4 WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 5.4.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 32 5.4.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 33 5.5 FLOODPLAIN ...................................................................................................................................................... 34 5.5.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 35 5.5.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 35 5.6 COASTAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................ 36 5.6.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 37 5.6.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 38 5.7 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 39 5.7.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 39 5.7.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 40 5.8 WILDLIFE AND FISH............................................................................................................................................ 41 5.8.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 41 ii 5.8.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 42 5.9 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ........................................................................................................ 43 5.9.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 43 5.9.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................. 46 5.10 CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................................... 47 5.10.1 Historic (Standing) Structures ................................................................................................................. 48 5.10.2 Archaeological Resources ........................................................................................................................ 50 5.11 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE .............................................................................................................................. 52 5.11.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 53 5.11.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................................................................ 55 5.12 LAND USE AND PLANNING............................................................................................................................... 56 5.12.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 56 5.12.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................................................................ 57 5.13 NOISE .............................................................................................................................................................. 58 5.13.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 59 5.13.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................................................................ 60 5.14 TRANSPORTATION .......................................................................................................................................... 60 5.14.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 61 5.14.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................................................................ 61 5.15 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 62 5.15.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 62 5.15.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................................................................ 63 5.16 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ........................................................................................................................... 65 5.16.1 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 65 5.16.2 Potential Impacts and Proposed Mitigation ............................................................................................ 66 5.17 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Fish And
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/09/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-21232, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0040] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AZ79 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Agave eggersiana, Gonocalyx concolor, and Varronia rupicola AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), designate critical habitat for three Caribbean plants, Agave eggersiana (no common name), Gonocalyx concolor (no common name), and Varronia rupicola (no common name), under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, we are designating 1 approximately 50.6 acres (20.5 hectares) of critical habitat for A. eggersiana in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), 198 ac (80.1 ha) for G. concolor in Puerto Rico, and 6,547 ac (2,648 ha) for V. rupicola in southern Puerto Rico and Vieques Island. The effect of this regulation is to conserve habitat for these plants under the Act. DATES: This rule is effective [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF FEDERAL REGISTER PUBLICATION]. ADDRESSES: This final rule is available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov and at the Caribbean Ecological Services Field Office. Comments and materials we received, as well as some supporting documentation we used in preparing this rule, are available for public inspection at http://www.regulations.gov. All of the comments, materials, and documentation that we considered in this rulemaking are available by appointment, during normal business hours at: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/061206 Al 21 April 2016 (21.04.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/061206 Al 21 April 2016 (21.04.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agent: BAUER, Christopher; PIONEER HI-BRED IN C12N 15/82 (2006.01) A01N 65/00 (2009.01) TERNATIONAL, INC., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, John C07K 14/415 (2006.01) ston, Iowa 5013 1-1014 (US). (21) International Application Number: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every PCT/US2015/055502 kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (22) Date: International Filing BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 14 October 2015 (14.10.201 5) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (25) Filing Language: English HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (26) Publication Language: English MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (30) Priority Data: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 62/064,810 16 October 20 14 ( 16.10.20 14) US SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INC. [US/US]; 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service 2012 Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae) Christina A. Olson Utah State University, [email protected] Karen H. Beard Utah State University, [email protected] William C. Pitt National Wildlife Research Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Olson, Christina A.; Beard, Karen H.; and Pitt, William C., "Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae)" (2012). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 1174. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/1174 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae)1 Christina A. Olson,2 Karen H. Beard,2,4 and William C. Pitt 3 Abstract: The greenhouse frog, Eleutherodactylus planirostris, is a direct- developing (i.e., no aquatic stage) frog native to Cuba and the Bahamas. It was introduced to Hawai‘i via nursery plants in the early 1990s and then subsequently from Hawai‘i to Guam in 2003. The greenhouse frog is now widespread on five Hawaiian Islands and Guam.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporton the Rare Plants of Puerto Rico
    REPORTON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO tii:>. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION ~ Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, Missouri July 15, l' 992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Center for Plant Conservation would like to acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation for their generous support of the Center's work in the priority region of Puerto Rico. We would also like to thank all the participants in the task force meetings, without whose information this report would not be possible. Cover: Zanthoxy7um thomasianum is known from several sites in Puerto Rico and the U.S . Virgin Islands. It is a small shrub (2-3 meters) that grows on the banks of cliffs. Threats to this taxon include development, seed consumption by insects, and road erosion. The seeds are difficult to germinate, but Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami has plants growing as part of the Center for Plant Conservation's .National Collection of Endangered Plants. (Drawing taken from USFWS 1987 Draft Recovery Plan.) REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements A. Summary 8. All Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands Species of Conservation Concern Explanation of Attached Lists C. Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] species D. Blank Taxon Questionnaire E. Data Sources for Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [B] species F. Pue~to Rico\Virgin Islands Task Force Invitees G. Reviewers of Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] Species REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO SUMMARY The Center for Plant Conservation (Center) has held two meetings of the Puerto Rlco\Virgin Islands Task Force in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Curaçao (1926)
    STUDIES ON THE FAUNA OF CURAÇAO AND OTHER CARIBBEAN ISLANDS: No. 114. The Antillean Eleutherodactylus of the Auriculatus group by Albert Schwartz (Miami) DUNN (1926) first proposed that the multiplicity of Cuban species of be into four One of Eleutherodactylus separated groups. these, the auriculatus him group, was characterized by as having a granular belly, short (= patch-like) vomerine series, well developed digital discs, and an external vocal sac in the males. Such a diagnosis has proved increasingly valuable in arranging Cuban Eleutherodactylus, and has resulted (SCHWARTZ, 1965a) in a dendrogram showing the proposed relationships of the members of this assemblage in Cuba. As knowledge of the habits and calls of West Indian frogs has increased, it has become evident that the auriculatus group is widespread throughout both the Greater and Lesser Antilles; in addition to the structural features noted by DUNN, certain charac- of and voice show there is teristics habitat, habits, that a striking in The of the uniformity these patterns as well. purpose present is summarize the of the paper to current knowledge auriculatus Indies. group members in the West Much of work in Cuba under the of National Science my was sponsorship two Foundation grants (G-3865 and G-6252), and for this financial assistance I am very Some of the details of calls and sites have been grateful. calling reported by my associates in the I wish to sincere for their assistance to field: express my gratitude Miss PATRICIA A. HEINLEIN and Messrs. RONALD F. KLINIKOWSKI, DAVID C. LEBER, and RICHARD THOMAS. Of the 37 species under discussion, I have heard calling and handled all but three in the field; such intimate association is invaluable with these frogs.
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA-Pesticides; Dodine
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDESDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES PC Code: 044301 DP Barcode: D338148 Date: January 22, 2008 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Ecological Risk Assessment for the Dodine Section 3 New Use on Peanuts and Bananas TO: Robert Westin, Product Manager Mary Waller, Team Leader Registration Division (7505P) FROM: Christopher J. Salice, P.h.D, Biologist Marietta Echeverria, Envronmental Scientist Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) REVIEWED BY: Thomas Steeger, Ph.D., Senior Biologist R. David Jones, Ph.D., Senior Agronomist Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) APPROVED BY: Elizabeth Behl, Branch Chief Environmental Risk Branch IV Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P) The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) has reviewed the proposed label for the use of dodine (n-dodecylguanidine monoacetate; CAS 2439-10-3) and its end-use product SYLLIT® FL (39.6% dodine) fungicide on peanuts and bananas. The results of this screening-level risk assessment indicate that the proposed new uses of dodine on peanuts and bananas have the potential for direct adverse effects on listed and non-listed freshwater and estuarine/marine invertebrates, listed and non-listed vascular and non-vascular plants, and listed and non-listed birds and mammals. Major data gaps are listed below. Without these data potential risk to the associated taxa can not be precluded: • Aquatic vascular plant toxicity data (850.4400) There is uncertainty regarding the potential chronic effects of dodine to saltwater invertebrates and fish since there are no toxicity data. Using acute-to-chronic ratios (ACR) from freshwater species to calculate chronic endpoints for the saltwater species, however, suggests that risks may be low.
    [Show full text]
  • Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor, and the Reterritorialization of White Masculinity
    This is a repository copy of Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor, and the Reterritorialization of White Masculinity. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/150181/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Negra, D and Tasker, Y orcid.org/0000-0001-8130-2251 (2019) Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor, and the Reterritorialization of White Masculinity. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 59 (1). pp. 112-133. ISSN 1527-2087 © 2019 University of Texas Press. This is a pre-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication in Journal of Cinema and Media Studies following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available through the University of Texas Press. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Culinary Entertainment, Creative Labor and the Re-Territorialization of White Masculinity Abstract This article explores popular cultural themes of masculinity and mobility in the context of post-race and “end of men” discourses.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 204/Tuesday, October 22, 2013
    62560 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules * * * * * Processing, Attn: FWS–R4–ES–2013– existing regulatory mechanisms; or (E) Dated: September 9, 2013. 0103; Division of Policy and Directives other natural or manmade factors Rachel Jacobson, Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife affecting its continued existence. Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish We have determined that listing is Wildlife and Parks. 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. warranted for these species, which are We request that you send comments currently at risk throughout all of their [FR Doc. 2013–24169 Filed 10–3–13; 8:45 am] only by the methods described above. respective ranges due to threats related BILLING CODE 4310–55–C We will post all comments on http:// to: www.regulations.gov. This generally • A. eggersiana—potential future DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR means that we will post any personal development for residential, urban, and information you provide us (see the tourist use; agriculture use; dropping of Fish and Wildlife Service Information Requested section below for debris; competing nonnative plants; more information). fires; predation; and disease cause by 50 CFR Part 17 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: insects (weevils). • [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2013–0103; Marelisa Rivera, Deputy Field G. concolor—installation or 4500030113] Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife expansion of telecommunication towers, Service, Caribbean Ecological Services road improvement, vegetation RIN 1018–AZ10 Field Office, P.O. Box 491, Road 301 management, and small number of ´ individuals and populations. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Km. 5.1, Boqueron, PR 00622; by • V.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Small Terrestrial Vertebrates in the Galapagos 2 3 Diego F
    1 Non-Native Small Terrestrial Vertebrates in the Galapagos 2 3 Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia 4 5 Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Laboratorio de Zoología 6 Terrestre & Museo de Zoología, Quito 170901, Ecuador 7 8 King’s College London, Department of Geography, London, UK 9 10 Email address: [email protected] 11 12 13 14 Introduction 15 Movement of propagules of a species from its current range to a new area—i.e., extra-range 16 dispersal—is a natural process that has been fundamental to the development of biogeographic 17 patterns throughout Earth’s history (Wilson et al. 2009). Individuals moving to new areas usually 18 confront a different set of biotic and abiotic variables, and most dispersed individuals do not 19 survive. However, if they are capable of surviving and adapting to the new conditions, they may 20 establish self-sufficient populations, colonise the new areas, and even spread into nearby 21 locations (Mack et al. 2000). In doing so, they will produce ecological transformations in the 22 new areas, which may lead to changes in other species’ populations and communities, speciation 23 and the formation of new ecosystems (Wilson et al. 2009). 24 25 Human extra-range dispersals since the Pleistocene have produced important distribution 26 changes across species of all taxonomic groups. Along our prehistory and history, we have aided 27 other species’ extra-range dispersals either by deliberate translocations or by ecological 28 facilitation due to habitat changes or modification of ecological relationships (Boivin et al. 29 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Socially Just Pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian Critical Disability Studies
    Towards socially just pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian critical disability studies Dan Goodley Reader in Disability Studies and co-director Centre of Applied Disability Studies, School of Education, University of Sheffield, 388 Glossop Road, Sheffield, S10 2TA http://www.shef.ac.uk/applieddisabilitystudies/ Revised paper submitted for Special Number of International Journal of Inclusive Education entitled: ‘Pedagogies: Matters of Social Justice and Inclusion’ 1 ABSTRACT Socially just pedagogies call for sensitivity to politics and culture. In this paper I will uncover some key challenges in relation to working pedagogically with disabled people through the exploration of a critical disability studies perspective. Firstly, I will unpack some of the assumptions that underpin educational understandings of 'disability' and 'impairment', suggesting that we need to engage more willingly with politicised and socially constructed ideas in relation to these phenomena. Secondly, I will raise questions about the current aims of pedagogy in relation to the market and the autonomous learner. In light of the market – and the subject it produces - I will argue that 'disability and 'impairment’ demand critical researchers to think more creatively about setting the conditions for experimenting with socially just pedagogies. Thirdly, with this experimentation in mind, I will draw upon the work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari to think of socially just pedagogies in terms of rhizomes (n-1); productive models of desire and planes of immanence. These concepts construct pedagogies as 'becoming' rather than 'being' – opening up resistant spaces and potential territories of social justice – all of them uncertain. 2 Introduction: a multiplicity of challenges Educators … should reject forms of schooling that marginalize students who are poor, black and least advantaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules
    7596 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 1996 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR appointment in the Regional Offices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: listed below. Fish and Wildlife Service Information relating to particular taxa Background in this notice may be obtained from the The Endangered Species Act (Act) of 50 CFR Part 17 Service's Endangered Species 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531 et Coordinator in the lead Regional Office seq.) requires the Service to identify Endangered and Threatened Wildlife identified for each taxon and listed species of wildlife and plants that are and Plants; Review of Plant and below: endangered or threatened, based on the Animal Taxa That Are Candidates for Region 1. California, Commonwealth best available scientific and commercial Listing as Endangered or Threatened of the Northern Mariana Islands, information. As part of the program to Species Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Pacific accomplish this, the Service has AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Territories of the United States, and maintained a list of species regarded as Interior. Washington. candidates for listing. The Service maintains this list for a variety of ACTION: Notice of review. Regional Director (TE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal reasons, includingÐto provide advance SUMMARY: In this notice the Fish and Complex, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, knowledge of potential listings that Wildlife Service (Service) presents an Portland, Oregon 97232±4181 (503± could affect decisions of environmental updated list of plant and animal taxa 231±6131). planners and developers; to solicit input native to the United States that are Region 2.
    [Show full text]