DOCSLIB.ORG

New Zealand Marine Protected Areas: Gaps Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Zealand Marine Protected Areas: Gaps Analysis New Zealand marine protected areas Gaps analysis Department of Conservation, Ministry for the Environment, Ministry for Primary Industries, 2019. Cover: Blue maomao with cabbage coral, Kermadec Islands. Photo: James Marsden DOC - 5976037 Crown copyright 2019, New Zealand Department of Conservation In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Territorial sea ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Marine biogeographic regions (or bioregions) and habitats .................................................................................................... 6 Marine protected area networks ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Representativity ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Replication ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 MPA policy ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 MPA protection standard ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Habitat classification .................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Coastal Classification and Mapping Scheme ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Classification of deepwater habitats ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.5 MPA inventory and gaps analysis: 2011 ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Mapping the habitat classification ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Mapping existing MPAs ........................................................................................................................................................................10 3.3 Habitat representativity .........................................................................................................................................................................10 3.4 GIS analyses .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.5 Habitat replication ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.6 Limitations of the gaps analysis ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Results ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Marine protected area coverage ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 4.2 Representativity ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 4.3 Replication ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 4.4 Overview of MPAs...................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 4.5 Other spatial protection tools ................................................................................................................................................................... 16 4.6 Overview of bioregions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Habitat representativity ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Habitat replication in MPAs ........................................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.7 Gaps analysis by bioregion: mainland .............................................................................................................................................. 27 Western North Island ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 27 North Cook Strait..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Eastern North Island ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 29 North Eastern .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 South Cook Strait ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 3 West Coast South Island .................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Fiordland ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 33 Southern South Island ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 East Coast South Island ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 4.8 Gaps analysis by bioregion: outlying islands ....................................................................................................................... 36 Kermadec Islands .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Three Kings Islands ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Chatham Islands .....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Movements of Tagged Sn in the Hauraki Gulf
    35 lssN 01111765 4tgr- DlvlslloN Movements of Tagged Sn vaË 1- in the Hauraki Gulf UBRARY by J. Crossland Fisheiies Research Division Occasional Publication No. 35 i c. I Movements of Tagged Sn o)l c)l Ë\ in the Haurak¡ Gulf sll-l I by J. Grossland Presant Address: Fisheries Department, Ministry of Land and Natural Resources, Port Vila, Vanuatu Fisheries Research Division Occasional Publication No. 35 1982 i .t Published by the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Wellington 1982 rssN 0110-1765 Contents Page Introduction 5 Tagging 5 Returns 5 Recaptures by fishing method 6 Positions of recaptured fish 6 Distances and directions of movement... 11 Distribution and movements ... 11 Conclusion 15 Acknowledgments 15 References 15 HAURAK I GULF Kowou I o Colville a o a a Whongoporooo \ a . .Boy o o .-l\ \l o Tiritirí it a Peninsulo a a a ooó a Motukowoo a 'Th" Noit"ì Group ) ¡.'¡O . o oo7 .T" \ o o to O¿s noffior >o Y /ðY"'l"u:'ì o ä' \ Auck a f'. o o a o07 Firlh of Thomes Fig. 1: The Hauraki Gulf, showing tagging sites (solid circles), places mentioned in the text, and the boundaries of fisheries statistical a¡eas. was done in the inner Flauraki Gulf (fisheries lntroduction statistical areas 006 and 007). The canvas cod-end technique was used o¡. all cruises except one; details During 7974-77 an extensive snapper tagging of this method and the tags used are given by programme was carried out in the Hauraki Gulf Crossland (1,976).
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2004
    Hauraki Gulf Forum The Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report Preface Vision for the Hauraki Gulf It’s a great place to be … because … • … kaitiaki sustain the mauri of the Gulf and its taonga … communities care for the land and sea … together they protect our natural and cultural heritage … • … there is rich diversity of life in the coastal waters, estuaries, islands, streams, wetlands, and forests, linking the land to the sea … • … waters are clean and full of fish, where children play and people gather food … • … people enjoy a variety of experiences at different places that are easy to get to … • … people live, work and play in the catchment and waters of the Gulf and use its resources wisely to grow a vibrant economy … • … the community is aware of and respects the values of the Gulf, and is empowered to develop and protect this great place to be1. 1 Developed by the Hauraki Gulf Forum 1 The Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2004 Acknowledgements The Forum would like to thank the following people who contributed to the preparation of this report: The State of the Environment Report Project Team Alan Moore Project Sponsor and Editor Auckland Regional Council Gerard Willis Project Co-ordinator and Editor Enfocus Ltd Blair Dickie Editor Environment Waikato Kath Coombes Author Auckland Regional Council Amanda Hunt Author Environmental Consultant Keir Volkerling Author Ngatiwai Richard Faneslow Author Ministry of Fisheries Vicki Carruthers Author Department of Conservation Karen Baverstock Author Mitchell Partnerships
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Input of Heavy Metals to Near-Coastal Sediment Depocenters in the Eastern North Sea and the Hauraki Gulf in Historical Times
    Anthropogenic input of heavy metals to near-coastal sediment depocenters in the eastern North Sea and the Hauraki Gulf in historical times Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) am Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Universität Bremen vorgelegt von Florian Boxberg Bremen, November 2017 Tag des öffentlichen Kolloquiums 29.01.2018 Gutachter der Dissertation Prof. Dr. Dierk Hebbeln Prof. Dr. Anne Bernhardt Weiter Mitglieder des Prüfungsausschusses Prof. Dr. Tobias Mörz Prof. Dr. Michal Kucera Dr. Gerhard Bartzke Laura Belter Versicherung an Eides Statt I Versicherung an Eides Statt Ich, ___________________________________________________________________________ (Vorname, Name, Anschrift) versichere an Eides Statt durch meine Unterschrift, dass ich die vorstehende Arbeit selbständig und ohne fremde Hilfe angefertigt und alle Stellen, die ich wörtlich dem Sinne nach aus Veröffentlichungen entnommen habe, als solche kenntlich gemacht habe, mich auch keiner anderen als der angegebenen Literatur oder sonstiger Hilfsmittel bedient habe. Ich versichere an Eides Statt, dass ich die vorgenannten Angaben nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen gemacht habe und dass die Angaben der Wahrheit entsprechen und ich nichts verschwiegen habe. Die Strafbarkeit einer falschen eidesstattlichen Versicherung ist mir bekannt, namentlich die Strafandrohung gemäß § 156 StGB bis zu drei Jahren Freiheitsstrafe oder Geldstrafe bei vorsätzlicher Begehung der Tat bzw. gemäß § 161 Abs. 1 StGB bis zu einem Jahr Freiheitsstrafe oder Geldstrafe bei fahrlässiger Begehung. __________________________ __________________ Ort, Datum Unterschrift Versicherung an Eides Statt II Danksagung III Danksagung Zunächst einmal möchte ich mich herzlich bei Prof. Dr. Dierk Hebbeln für die Vergabe der Arbeit sowie die sehr gute Betreuung und die sehr angenehme Atmosphäre während der ganzen Zeit bedanken. Ich danke Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki Gulf Transit Protocol for Commercial Shipping
    Hauraki Gulf Transit Protocol for Commercial Shipping The port of Auckland is located It is believed that around two This protocol is part of that on the east coast of New Bryde’s whales a year are killed effort. It outlines steps Masters Zealand’s North Island in a after being struck by a vessel, should take when planning their nationally significant maritime which is a threat to the local passage to and from Auckland, area called the Hauraki Gulf, an population’s long-term survival. and what to do while transiting area with Marine Park status. That is why Ports of Auckland the Hauraki Gulf. (POAL), the shipping industry, The Hauraki Gulf is one of the few New Zealand’s Department Your help in protecting our local places in the world with a semi- of Conservation (DOC), and whales is greatly appreciated. resident population of Bryde’s Auckland University, are leading whale. The local whale population efforts to find ways to reduce the Tony Gibson is small, estimated at less than risk of colliding with a whale. CEO, Ports of Auckland 200, and is listed as critically May 2014 endangered in New Zealand. Reducing the risk of collisions with whales 1 Passage planning Minimising the risk of collisions with whales should be a regular part of planning a passage. The best way to reduce risk is to avoid areas with the most whales. If it is not possible to do this, then where possible plan to slow down in these areas. There is good scientific evidence that the risk to whales is substantially less from ships travelling at 10 knots compared to 15 knots or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2011 State of Our Gulf
    State of our Gulf Tıikapa Moana – Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2011 State of our Gulf Tıikapa Moana – Hauraki Gulf State of the Environment Report 2011 First published August 2011 Published by: Hauraki Gulf Forum c/o Auckland Council Private Bag 42300 Auckland, 1142 The Hauraki Gulf Forum is a statutory body, established under the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000, responsible for the promotion and facilitation of integrated management and the protection and enhancement of the Hauraki Gulf. The Forum has representation on behalf of the Ministers of Conservation, Fisheries and Mäori Affairs, elected representatives from Auckland Council (including the Great Barrier and Waiheke local boards), Waikato Regional Council, and the Waikato, Hauraki, Thames-Coromandel and Matamata-Piako district councils, plus six representatives of the tängata whenua of the Hauraki Gulf and its islands. Contact: Tim Higham Hauraki Gulf Forum Manager, Auckland Council ph 09 624 4749, [email protected] www.haurakigulfforum.org.nz Photography Roger Grace, Shane Kelly 978-1-927169-88-9 (Print) 978-1-927169-89-6 (Online) Disclaimer While Forum members and their consultants have exercised all reasonable skill and care in controlling the contents of information contained in this report, they accept no liability in contract, tort or otherwise howsoever, for any loss, damage, injury or expense (whether direct, indirect or consequential) arising out of the provision of this information or its use by you or others. 4 Tikapa Moana – Hauraki
    [Show full text]
  • A Small Ship with Big Adventures, Sheltered Waters, Big Ship Comfort and Exceptional Intimacy
    A small ship with Big adventures, Sheltered waters, Big ship comfort and Exceptional intimacy. Step aboard and explore the islands of Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf Marine Park, cruising to remote villages on Great Barrier Island, visiting Kawau Island, New Zealand’s playground for the rich and famous, and the stunning beaches and coves of The Coromandel Peninsular. Discover our magnificent cruising region, all within easy reach of New Zealand’s bustling Auckland City. Cruising aboard Island Passage with its state of the art design, stylish interior and a full range of sporting facilities means you can create a holiday that suits your needs. The Island Passage is perfect for a leisurely break from a hectic lifestyle. Within easy reach of your ship there are first class golf courses, world-class wineries and a multitude of water-based activities, or you may choose to relax with a good book in the library or laze on a steamer deck chair in the sun. You decide. Evenings are a highlight of small ship cruising where the mood changes onboard to sunset cocktails, white linen dining and personal service as you enjoy excellent Pacific Cuisine by our chef. Enjoy stunning scenery as we anchor in the picturesque quiet bays of the Hauraki Gulf. For the angler Island Passage is your large mother-ship that cruises around the great fishing spots of the Hauraki Gulf and further afield on request. Fully equipped with the best of fishing gear to cover from novice to professional. Our sport fishing expeditions are adventure orientated. Daily activities include helicopter expeditions, snorkelling, diving and much more..
    [Show full text]
  • Research Commons at The
    http://waikato.researchgateway.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. THE CONTINENTAL SHELF AS A SITE FOR DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, NORTHEAST NEW ZEALAND A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Earth and Ocean Sciences at University of Waikato by BRYNA K. FLAIM University of Waikato 2008 ABSTRACT Disposal of dredged material has been an on-going problem in the Auckland Coastal Marine Area (CMA) since the early 1980s in New Zealand. Many disposal grounds have been established and used, but public concern over adverse effects resulted in their ultimate closure. Presently, dredged material is disposed off-shore at a site simultaneously accessed by the Royal New Zealand Navy for disposal of WWII munitions recovered from coastal areas. As early as the mid- 1990s, parliamentary focus groups established the need for a more suitable disposal option for dredged material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of the New Zealand Snapper
    ,27 The Biology of the New Zealand Snapper By J. Grossland Fisheries Research Division Occasional Publication No. 23 The B¡ology of the New Zealand Snapper By J. Grossland Fisheries Research Division Occasional Publication No. 23 I 981 Published by the New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Wellington r981 rssN 0r10-1765 Contents Page 5 5 5 5 7 Habitat 7 a Reproduction . Maturity Seasonal cycle 7 Spawning areas I Egg. I B Larvae 8 Age and growth B Mortality .,. ll Population structure and size ... r2 Food and feeding 12 Movements 13 Bibliography l5 Ë -.¿ *+ -F' 's .èlb+-.r ,T' .. ."lF f*,.-ì-. )l 'r:'*ifr ¡ é'.o åR.'* It.l r ,fr:#.. ,Í Ft , .-a - '*. ,' ] ar *r t. I I Lr B;l;'r' '-r a¿ì a t ) I å"ç¡1 -t ll r-.i' a .a -- tt ,:¡\ lr'Ðe ,* I lt r' m -: -lt-1. [f.. O. nirfrie photognph. The New Zealand snaPPer. separate by Japanese workers because of differences in lntroduction some of the skull bones. Whether all of these are really The abundance of snapper and its excellent distinct species depends much on the interpretation of qualities as a food fish make it the most important fish "species". Species do not suddenly become distinct species in New Zealand, both to commercial and because of geographical separation, nor do they do so amateur fishermen. Aspects of its life history have at a defined time; perhaps the four species mentioned been studied for many years and more is known about above are at present "half a species" apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats and Areas of Particular Significance for Coastal Finfish
    Habitats and areas of particular significance for coastal finfish fisheries management in New Zealand: A review of concepts and life history knowledge, and suggestions for future research New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 125 M.A. Morrison, E.G. Jones, D.P. Parsons, C.M. Grant ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-0-478-42387-7 (online) March 2014 Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries websites at: http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-resources/publications.aspx http://fs.fish.govt.nz go to Document library/Research reports © Crown Copyright - Ministry for Primary Industries Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Scope and limitations of review .............................................................................................. 4 2. A BRIEF REVIEW OF SOME CONCEPTS ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Spawning........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Nursery habitats ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Migrations
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Natural Character Values and Characteristics to Be Inserted Into District Plan Working Draft As at 6 June 2018
    Schedule of Natural Character Values and Characteristics To be inserted into District Plan Working Draft as at 6 June 2018 CHARACTER CHARACTER CLASSIFICATION VALUES AND CHARACTERISTICS AREA AREA NAME NUMBER 1 Rocky Point – Te High Landforms: Puru Hill Country These elevated (approximately700m asl) coastal foothills branch steeply off a prominent ridgeline from the main Coromandel Range down towards the Firth of Thames. The sequence of largely intact spurs and gullies within the character area have a strong relief and jagged profile, drained by numerous streams. Vegetation Type, Cover and Patterns: A sequence of remnant and regenerating coastal forest cover along the ridges and slopes from shoreline up to lowland forest. Vegetation types include pohutukawa, kauri, broadleaf and small-leaved scrub, manuka and kanuka. The simple vegetation pattern reinforces the underlying topography. Cleared areas of pasture/grassland occupy some of the more moderate slopes and have been excluded from the character area. Sea / Estuarine Water Bodies: These elevated bush clad coastal slopes form a prominent backdrop to the Firth of Thames. The flat expanse of sea provides a noticeable contrast with the steeply rising hills, separated by a narrow rocky shoreline. Land Uses / Activities / Structure: The area within the character area includes public conservation land and is largely free of built development. Sizeable areas of coastal development have been excluded from the character area however several dwellings and associated infrastructure are scattered over the hills. Together with the wilding pines and farmland these modifications reduce cohesion and naturalness where they are adjacent to the character area boundary. Overall, the HNC area remains relatively undeveloped.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    NOTORNIS Journal of the Ornithological Society of New Zealand Volume 32 Part 2 June 1985 OFFICERS 1985-86 President - B. BROWN, 20 Redmount Place, Red Hill, Papakura Vice-president - D. E. Crockett, 21 McMillan Ave., Karno, Whangarei Editor - B. D. HEATHER, 10 Jocelyn Crescent, Silverstream Treasurer - D. F. BOOTH, P.O. Box 35337, Browns Bay, Auckland 10 Secretary - R. S. SLACK, c/o P.O., Pauatahanui, Wellington Council Members: BEN D. BELL, Zoology Dept, Victoria University, Private Bag, Wellington BRIAN D. BELL. 9 Ferry Road, Seatoun, Wellington P. C. BULL. 131A Waterloo Road, Lower Hutt P. D. GAZE, Ecology Division, Private Bag, Nelson B. J. GILL, Auckland Institute & Museum, Private Bag. Auckland J. HAWKINS, 772 Atawhai Drive, Nelson P. M. SAGAR, 38A Yardley Street, Christchurch 4 Cbnveners and Organisers: Rare Birds Committee: Secretary, J. F. M. FENNELL, 224 Horndon Street, Darfield, Canterbury Beach Patrol: R. G. POWLESLAND, Wildlife Service, Dept. of Internal Affairs, Private Bag, Wellington Librarian: A. J. GOODWIN, R.D. 1, Clevedon Nest Records: H. A. ROBERTSON, Ecology Division, DSIR, Private Bag, Lower Hutt CZassz ied Summarked Notes - dorth Island: L. HOWELL. 38 Okahu Rd., Kaitaia South Island: P. D. GAZE, Ecology Division, DSIR, Private Bag, Nelson S.W. Pacific Island Records: J. L. MOORE, 32 Brook St., Lower Hutt Editor of OSNZ news: P. SACAR, 38A Yardley St., Christchurch 4 SUBSCRIPTIONS AND MEMBERSHIP Annual Subsc~ition: Ordinary member $20; Husband & Wife mem- bers $30; funior member (under 20) $15; Life Member $400; Family member (one Notornis er household) bein other family of a member in the same house1 old as a member 510; Institution $40; Overseas member and overseas institution $5.00 extra (postage).
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting the Hauraki Gulf Islands
    PROTECTING THE HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS Raewyn Peart and Cordelia Woodhouse PROTECTING THE HAURAKI GULF ISLANDS Raewyn Peart and Cordelia Woodhouse First published November 2020 Published by: Environmental Defence Society Incorporated P O Box 91736 Victoria St West Auckland 1142 Phone (09) 302 2972 [email protected] www.eds.org.nz www.environmentguide.org.nz © Environmental Defence Society Incorporated 2020 Design: Neale Wills, Wilsy Design & Production Ltd Photographic images: Raewyn Peart unless otherwise indicated Cover image: Palmers Beach, Aotea/Great Barrier Island Copies can be downloaded from www.eds.org.nz ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to acknowledge the support of Auckland Council in funding this case study. We would also like to thank all those who generously agreed to be interviewed for this study and the peer reviewers for their invaluable contributions. This case study will form part of a report being supported by the Department of Conservation and Land Information New Zealand. ii PROTECTING THE WAITĀKERE RANGES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 PART ONE: OVERALL CONTEXT 3 2 The Hauraki Gulf 3 2.1 Geological formation of islands 3 2.2 Early Māori settlement 4 2.3 Early European settlement 4 3 Statutory management framework 5 3.1 Resource Management Act 5 3.2 National instruments 9 3.3 Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 10 3.4 Regional instruments 15 3.5 District instruments 17 3.6 Incorporation of the Hauraki Gulf islands into the Auckland Unitary Plan framework 19 PART TWO: ISLAND CASE STUDIES 21 4 Aotea/Great Barrier Island 21
    [Show full text]