A Trio of Tantalizing Spring Bulbs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Wild Hyacinth (Camassia Scilloides) in Canada
PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Adopted under Section 44 of SARA Recovery Strategy for the Wild Hyacinth (Camassia scilloides) in Canada Wild Hyacinth 2015 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2015. Recovery Strategy for the Wild Hyacinth (Camassia scilloides) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. 21 pp. + Annexes. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: © Gary Allen Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de la camassie faux-scille (Camassia scilloides) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2015. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca RECOVERY STRATEGY FOR THE WILD HYACINTH (CAMMASSIA SCILLOIDES) IN CANADA 2015 Under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996), the federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together on legislation, programs, and policies to protect wildlife species at risk throughout Canada. In the spirit of cooperation of the Accord, the Government of Ontario has given permission to the Government of Canada to adopt the Recovery Strategy for the Wild Hyacinth (Camassia scilloides) in Ontario (Part 2) under Section 44 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA). -
Bulb Dormancy in Vitro—Fritillaria Meleagris: Initiation, Release and Physiological Parameters
plants Review Bulb Dormancy In Vitro—Fritillaria meleagris: Initiation, Release and Physiological Parameters Marija Markovi´c*, Milana Trifunovi´cMomˇcilov , Branka Uzelac , Sladana¯ Jevremovi´c and Angelina Suboti´c Department of Plant Physiology, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stankovi´c“—NationalInstitute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia; [email protected] (M.T.M.); [email protected] (B.U.); [email protected] (S.J.); [email protected] (A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In ornamental geophytes, conventional vegetative propagation is not economically feasible due to very slow development and ineffective methods. It can take several years until a new plant is formed and commercial profitability is achieved. Therefore, micropropagation techniques have been developed to increase the multiplication rate and thus shorten the multiplication and regeneration period. The majority of these techniques rely on the formation of new bulbs and their sprouting. Dormancy is one of the main limiting factors to speed up multiplication in vitro. Bulbous species have a period of bulb dormancy which enables them to survive unfavorable natural conditions. Bulbs grown in vitro also exhibit dormancy, which has to be overcome in order to allow sprouting of bulbs in the next vegetation period. During the period of dormancy, numerous physiological processes occur, many of which have not been elucidated yet. Understanding the process of dormancy will allow us to speed up and improve breeding of geophytes and thereby achieve economic profitability, which is very important for horticulture. This review focuses on recent findings in the area of Citation: Markovi´c,M.; Momˇcilov, bulb dormancy initiation and release in fritillaries, with particular emphasis on the effect of plant M.T.; Uzelac, B.; Jevremovi´c,S.; growth regulators and low-temperature pretreatment on dormancy release in relation to induction of Suboti´c,A. -
Karyological Studies of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) Species from Iran
© 2016 The Japan Mendel Society Cytologia 81(2): 133–141 Karyological Studies of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) Species from Iran Marzieh Ahmadi-Roshan1, Ghasem Karimzadeh1*, Alireza Babaei2 and Hadi Jafari2 1 Department of Plant Breeding and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran P. O. Box 14115–336, Iran 2 Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Received September 26, 2015; accepted March 14, 2016 Summary Five species (13 ecotypes) belonging to three subgenera of ornamental-medicinal Iranian Fritillaria were karyotypically studied, using a standard squash technique. All species were diploid (2n=2x=24) having mean chromosome lengths of 15.8 µm (15.2–16.7 µm). Their satellites varied in number (1–3 pairs) and in size (1.2–2.6 µm), mostly being located on long arms. Four chromosome types (“m”, “sm”, “st”, “T”) formed 10 dif- ferent karyotype formulas: “T” type chromosome is reported for the first time in most species (with the exception of S4, Fritillaria. reuteri Boissi). ANOVA confirmed significant intra- and inter-specific chromosomal variation across the Iranian Fritillaria species. Twelve different methods were used to assess the degree of karyotype asymmetry. Among those, one qualitative parameter (Stebbins classification) and eight quantitative (CVTL, DI, A1 & A2, AI, A, AsK%, MCA, CVCI) parameters verified that S2 (F. gibbosa Boiss.) and S5 (F. zagrica Stapf.) species represented the most asymmetrical and symmetrical karyotypes, respectively. Key words Fritillaria, Cytogenetics, New chromosome type, Karyotype, Iran. The name Fritillaria is likely based on the word “fri- Fritillaria subgenus is morphologically classified into six tullus” which means a cup in Latin (Ulug et al. -
AGCBC Seedlist2019booklet
! Alpine Garden Club of British Columbia Seed Exchange 2019 Alpine Garden Club of British Columbia Seed Exchange 2019 We are very grateful to all those members who have made our Seed Exchange possible through donating seeds. The number of donors was significantly down this year, which makes the people who do donate even more precious. We particularly want to thank the new members who donated seed in their first year with the Club. A big thank-you also to those living locally who volunteer so much time and effort to packaging and filling orders. READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE FILLING IN THE REQUEST FORM. PLEASE KEEP YOUR SEED LIST, packets will be marked by number only. Return the enclosed request form by mail or, if you have registered to do so, by the on-line form, as soon as possible, but no later than DECEMBER 8. Allocation: Donors may receive up to 60 packets and non-donors 30 packets, limit of one packet of each selection. Donors receive preference for seeds in short supply (USDA will permit no more than 50 packets for those living in the USA). List first choices by number only, in strict numerical order, from left to right on the order form. Enter a sufficient number of second choices in the spaces below, since we may not be able to provide all your first choices. Please print clearly. Please be aware that we have again listed wild collected seed (W) and garden seed (G) of the same species separately, which is more convenient for people ordering on-line. -
Fall 2013 NARGS
Rock Garden uar terly � Fall 2013 NARGS to ADVERtISE IN thE QuARtERly CoNtACt [email protected] Let me know what yo think A recent issue of a chapter newsletter had an item entitled “News from NARGS”. There were comments on various issues related to the new NARGS website, not all complimentary, and then it turned to the Quarterly online and raised some points about which I would be very pleased to have your views. “The good news is that all the Quarterlies are online and can easily be dowloaded. The older issues are easy to read except for some rather pale type but this may be the result of scanning. There is amazing information in these older issues. The last three years of the Quarterly are also online but you must be a member to read them. These last issues are on Allen Press’s BrightCopy and I find them harder to read than a pdf file. Also the last issue of the Quarterly has 60 extra pages only available online. Personally I find this objectionable as I prefer all my content in a printed bulletin.” This raises two points: Readability of BrightCopy issues versus PDF issues Do you find the BrightCopy issues as good as the PDF issues? Inclusion of extra material in online editions only. Do you object to having extra material in the online edition which can not be included in the printed edition? Please take a moment to email me with your views Malcolm McGregor <[email protected]> CONTRIBUTORS All illustrations are by the authors of articles unless otherwise stated. -
Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society of London
I 3 2044 105 172"381 : JOURNAL OF THE llopl lortimltoal fbck EDITED BY Key. GEORGE HEXSLOW, ALA., E.L.S., F.G.S. rtanical Demonstrator, and Secretary to the Scientific Committee of the Royal Horticultural Society. VOLUME VI Gray Herbarium Harvard University LOXD N II. WEEDE & Co., PRINTERS, BEOMPTON. ' 1 8 8 0. HARVARD UNIVERSITY HERBARIUM. THE GIFT 0F f 4a Ziiau7- m 3 2044 i"05 172 38" J O U E N A L OF THE EDITED BY Eev. GEOEGE HENSLOW, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. Botanical Demonstrator, and Secretary to the Scientific Committee of the Royal Horticultural Society. YOLUME "VI. LONDON: H. WEEDE & Co., PRINTERS, BROMPTON, 1 8 80, OOUITOIL OF THE ROYAL HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY. 1 8 8 0. Patron. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. President. The Eight Honourable Lord Aberdare. Vice- Presidents. Lord Alfred S. Churchill. Arthur Grote, Esq., F.L.S. Sir Trevor Lawrence, Bt., M.P. H. J". Elwes, Esq. Treasurer. Henry "W ebb, Esq., Secretary. Eobert Hogg, Esq., LL.D., F.L.S. Members of Council. G. T. Clarke, Esq. W. Haughton, Esq. Colonel R. Tretor Clarke. Major F. Mason. The Rev. H. Harpur Crewe. Sir Henry Scudamore J. Denny, Esq., M.D. Stanhope, Bart. Sir Charles "W. Strickland, Bart. Auditors. R. A. Aspinall, Esq. John Lee, Esq. James F. West, Esq. Assistant Secretary. Samuel Jennings, Esq., F.L S. Chief Clerk J. Douglas Dick. Bankers. London and County Bank, High Street, Kensington, W. Garden Superintendent. A. F. Barron. iv ROYAL HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE, 1880. Chairman. Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, K.C.S.I., M.D., C.B.,F.R.S., V.P.L.S., Royal Gardens, Kew. -
Dyuhei Sato Division of Genetics, Bot. Inst. Faculty of Science, Tokyo
ANALYSIS OF THE KARYOTYPES IN YUCCA, A GA VE AND THE RELATED GENERA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE PHYLOGENETIC SIGNIFICANCEI~ Dyuhei SATo Divisionof Genetics, Bot. Inst. Faculty of Science, Tokyo Imperial University McKelvey and Sax (2933) have called attention to the existence of taxonomic and cytological similarities of the genera Yucca, Hesperoyucca, Gleistvucca,Hesperoaloe and Samuela of the Liliaceae with the genera Agave and Fourcroya which belong to a related family, Amaryllidaceae. Wh.itaker (1934) also has reported that Polianhes and Fourcroya have exactly the same chromosome constitution as the Yucca-Abave karyotype (5 long and 25 short chromosomes) (Figs. 1, 2). These observations when considered in respect to taxonomic resemblances, seem to indicate that the genera mentioned above are more closely related than it is shown by their classifica- tion into distinct families. Whitaker also has remarked that Dasylirion (2n=38) and ATolina(2n=36) in Yucceae and Doryanthes (2n=36) in Agavoideae are of different karyotypes from the Yucca-Agave type. In the present work an analysis of the karyotypes in Liliaceous plants has been attempted and several karyotypes have been found in Scilloideae. Eucornis and Carassia have been selected with the purpose of discovering a possible connecting link between these genera and the Yucca-Agave group. In the present paper an analysis of the karyotypes of the following species is given. LILIACEAE Scilloideae 211 Fig. Euconis undulata 60=8L+8M+44S (4b)2) 3 Euconsispallidi ora 60=8L+8M+44S (4b) 4 Eucomispunctata 60=8L±8M+44S (4b) 5 Camassiaescrema 30=6L+24S (2b) 6 Yucceae Yuccafilamentosa 30 60=1OL+50S (2b) 1, 7 Yuccarecurvifolia 30 60=1OL+50S (2b) 2, 8 Yuccaaloifolia 60=1OL+50S (2b) 9 „ var. -
Landscaping with Native Plants by Stephen L
SHORT-SEASON, HIGH-ALTITUDE GARDENING BULLETIN 862 Landscaping with native plants by Stephen L. Love, Kathy Noble, Jo Ann Robbins, Bob Wilson, and Tony McCammon INTRODUCTION There are many reasons to consider a native plant landscape in Idaho’s short- season, high-altitude regions, including water savings, decreased mainte- nance, healthy and adapted plants, and a desire to create a local theme CONTENTS around your home. Most plants sold for landscaping are native to the eastern Introduction . 1 United States and the moist climates of Europe. They require acid soils, con- The concept of native . 3 stant moisture, and humid air to survive and remain attractive. Most also Landscaping Principles for Native Plant Gardens . 3 require a longer growing season than we have available in the harshest cli- Establishing Native Landscapes and Gardens . 4 mates of Idaho. Choosing to landscape with these unadapted plants means Designing a Dry High-Desert Landscape . 5 Designing a Modified High-Desert Landscape . 6 accepting the work and problems of constantly recreating a suitable artificial Designing a High-Elevation Mountain Landscape . 6 environment. Native plants will help create a landscape that is more “com- Designing a Northern Idaho Mountain/Valley fortable” in the climates and soils that surround us, and will reduce the Landscape . 8 resources necessary to maintain the landscape. Finding Sources of Native Plants . 21 The single major factor that influences Idaho’s short-season, high-altitude climates is limited summer moisture. Snow and rainfall are relatively abun- dant in the winter, but for 3 to 4 months beginning in June, we receive only a YOU ARE A SHORT-SEASON, few inches of rain. -
Plant Propagation Protocol for Camassia Quamash ESRM 412
Plant Propagation Protocol for Camassia quamash ESRM 412 - Native Plant Production Spring 2020 Figure 1 Photo by Gary A Monroe from CalPhotos. Web. 6 May 2020 Figure 2 Plants Database. Camassia quamash. USDA, n.d. Web. Figure 3 Plants Database. Camassia quamash. USDA, n.d. Web. 6 May 2020. 6 May 2020. North American Distribution Washington Distribution TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Liliaceae1 Common Name Lily family1 Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene1 Varieties No information found Sub-species Camassia quamash ssp. azurea (A. Heller) Gould – small camas Camassia quamash ssp. breviflora Gould – small camas Camassia quamash ssp. intermedia Gould – small camas Camassia quamash ssp. linearis Gould – small camas Camassia quamash ssp. maxima Gould – small camas Camassia quamash ssp. quamash (Pursh) Greene – small camas Camassia quamash ssp. utahensis Gould – Utah small camas Camassia quamash ssp. walpolei (Piper) Gould – Walpole's small camas2 Cultivar No information found Common Synonym(s) Camassia esculenta Lindl. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene subsp. teapeae (H. St. John) H. St. John Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. azurea (A. Heller) C.L. Hitchc. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. breviflora (Gould) C.L. Hitchc. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. intermedia (Gould) C.L. Hitchc. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. linearis (Gould) J.T. Howell Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. maxima (Gould) B. Boivin Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. quamash Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. utahensis (Gould) C.L. Hitchc. Quamassia quamash (Pursh) Coville4 Common Names Southern Lushootseed (Coast Salish Language) for camas: blue camas, crow potato, Camassia spp.: c̕ábid. camas, Camassia quamash, C. leichtinii: qʷəɬúʔəl. camas roots that are processed and dried: s√x̌əʤəb. -
Morphological and Ornamental Studies of Eremurus Species
LUCRĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE SERIA HORTICULTURĂ, 60 (2) / 2017, USAMV IAŞI MORPHOLOGICAL AND ORNAMENTAL STUDIES OF EREMURUS SPECIES STUDII PRIVIND CARACTERELE MORFOLOGICE ŞI ORNAMENTALE ALE UNOR SPECII DE EREMURUS BAHRIM Cezar 1, BRÎNZĂ Maria1, CHELARIU Elena Liliana1, DRAGHIA Lucia1 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The species of Eremurus genus (Liliaceae family), by its distinctive ornamental characters and its ability to adapt to the most diverse ecological conditions, can represent valuable variants in the enrichment of floral assortment, for landscaping design or cut flowers. In this paper are presented the results of observations and determinations carried out for three species of Eremurus (E. himalaicus Baker, E. robustus Regel, E. stenophyllus (Boiss. & Buhse) Bak.) cultivated in Iasi (N-E Romania) during 2015-2016. The main objective of the paper is to highlight the morphological and decorative characters of these plants, so that their cultivation can be valid in unprotected conditions and the efficient way of uses. The results obtained support the promotion of these plants in culture, both in floral art and in landscaping design. Key words: Eremurus, morphological characters, ornamental value Rezumat. Speciile genului Eremurus (familia Liliaceae), prin caracterele ornamentale deosebite şi prin capacitatea bună de adaptare la cele mai diverse condiţii ecologice, pot reprezenta variante foarte valoroase în îmbogăţirea sortimentului de plante floricole pentru amenajarea grădinilor sau pentru flori tăiate. În lucrarea de faţă sunt prezentate rezultatele observaţiilor şi determinărilor efectuate în perioada 2015-2016 la trei specii de Eremurus (E. himalaicus Baker, E. robustus Regel, E. stenophyllus (Boiss. & Buhse) Bak.) cultivate la Iaşi (partea de N-E României). Obiectivul principal al lucrării este de a evidenţia caracterele morfo-decorative ale acestor plante, astfel încât să poată fi argumentată cultivarea lor în condiţii neprotejate şi modul eficient de valorificare. -
Cibulnaté a Hlíznaté Rostliny
Cibulnaté a hlíznaté rostliny Přehled druhů 2: Asparagales Řád Asparagales rozsáhlý řád, 14 čeledí, některé obrovské semena rostlin obsahují černé barvivo melanin (některé druhy ho druhotně ztratily) Hosta PREZENTACE © JN Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Řád Asparagales Čeleď Iridaceae (kosatcovité) vytrvalé byliny s oddenky, hlízami, nebo cibulemi stonek přímý nevětvený, někdy zkrácený listy mečovité nebo čárkovité, dvouřadé se souběžnou žilnatinou květy jednotlivé nebo v chudých květenstvích (vějířek nebo srpek) – významné druhy okrasného zahradnictví subtropy až mírné pásmo 70/1750, ČR 3/12 PREZENTACE © JN Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Řád Asparagales Čeleď Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Zahradnicky významné jsou: mečíky (Gladiolus), frézie (Freesia), kosatce (Iris), šafrány (Crocus) Mezi další zahradnicky významné Iridaceae patří např. Crocosmia, Ixia, Tigridia © Saxifraga-Dirk Hilbers © Saxifraga-Inigo Sanchez Iris xiphium http://www.freenatureimages.eu/Plants/Flora%20D-I/Iris%20xiphium/slides/Iris%20xiphium%201,%20Saxifraga-Dirk%20Hilbers.jpg http://www.freenatureimages.eu/Plants/Flora%20D-I/Iris%20xiphium/slides/Iris%20xiphium%202,%20Saxifraga-Inigo%20Sanchez.jpg Iridaceae (kosatcovité) Iris (kosatec) zahrnuje i množství druhů které se neřadí mezi cibuloviny. Do cibulovin patří kosatce sekce Xiphium a Reticulata Sekce Xiphium - původní druhy pocházejí ze středomoří, hlavně Pyrenejí, zde rostou v 1500 m na mořem Cibule se 3-5 masitými šupinami, žlábkovité listy , stvol s 2-3 tuhými zelenými listeny a 2-3 květy, jsou modré se žlutým středem na vnějších okvětních lístcích, v přírodě kvetou koncem června Křížením původních druh této sekce hlavně Iris xiphium a I. tingitana vzniklo velké množství kutivarů – označované jako Dutch iris (holandské kosatce), pěstují se tržně v mnoha barvách (od bílé, žluté, modré až po fialovou) a prodávají jako řezané květiny např. -
Floristic Quality Assessment Report
FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.