DOCSLIB.ORG

Country Health Cluster / Sector Dashboard December 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Country Health Cluster / Sector Dashboard December 2020 COUNTRY HEALTH CLUSTER / SECTOR DASHBOARD DECEMBER 2020 PEOPLE TARGETED 90.8 million REQUESTED FUNDING US$ 3.6 billion FUNDED US$ 1.1 billion 30% CLUSTERS/SECTORS 28 national 2 regional 128 sub-hubs STAFF 25 FT HCCs (83%) 17 FT IMOs (57%) CO-COORDINATION 11 by MoH This dashboard includes all activated clusters and other national health emergencies coordination platforms with a 2020 15 by NGOs Humanitarian Response Plan. LEGEND - The Health Cluster Dashboard as of Septmber 2020 includes COVID-19 figures (COVID- 19 PiN/targeted and funding requested/received for COVID-19), when Country Health Clusters have made these publicly available. Not all Country Health Clusters have COVID-19 figures publicly available. - When available, updated Humanitarian Response Plans, COVID-19 extensions and country COVID-19 response plans are hyperlinked from the Country Cluster name. - Given the complexities of the COVID-19 addendums, it is sometimes not possible to disaggregate COVID-19 and HRP data sufficiently to sum. In those cases, the maximum figure was taken to ensure no double counting. FT - Full Time PT - Part Time a.i. – ad interim/acting INGO – International Nongovernmental Organization NNGO – National Nongovernmental Organization HCC – Health Cluster Coordinator IMO – Information Management Officer PHO – Public Health Officer MOH – Ministry of Health SUB-NATIONAL HUBS – click on hyperlinks for more information on the staff AFGHANISTAN BANGLADESH (COX'S BAZAR) BURKINA FASO GRADE 2 PROTRACTED 2 GRADE 2 10.1 million 171.1 million 1.4 million 172.1 million 2.6 million 40.7 million PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ 7 million 55% 1.4 million 25% 2.1 million 60% PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED 2007 WHO MOH 2017 MOH WHO 2019 WHO TdH ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR NATIONAL TEAM: 2 PARTNERS: 50 NATIONAL TEAM: 3 PARTNERS: 152 NATIONAL TEAM: 2 PARTNERS: 48 1 FT COORDINATOR 14 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 59 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 29 INGOS 1 PT IM OFFICER 28 NGOS 2 FT IM OFFICERS 59 NGOS 1 PT IM OFFICER 3 NGOS 0 PH OFFICER 4 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 9 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 5 UN AGENCIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 0 COMMS OFFICER 6 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 3 DONORS 7 DONORS 4 DONORS 0 OBSERVERS 12 OBSERVERS 5 OBSERVERS 6 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 0 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 3 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS Gardiz, Herat, Jalalabad, Kandahar, Kunduz, Mazaar-e-Sharif Dor, Est, Kaya BURUNDI CAMEROON CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC GRADE 2 GRADE 2 PROTRACTED 2 554, 000 7.3 million 2.9 million 32.2 million 4.9 million 45.7 million PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ 260, 000 11% 1.9 million 48% 3 million 63% PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED 2015 WHO UNICEF 2018 MOH WHO, UNFPA 2007 WHO MDA ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR NATIONAL TEAM: 4 PARTNERS: 30 NATIONAL TEAM: 7 PARTNERS: 42 NATIONAL TEAM: 1 PARTNERS: 78 1 PT COORDINATOR 22 INGOS 1 PT COORDINATOR 10 INGOS 1 PT COORDINATOR 35 INGOS 1 PT IM OFFICER 3 NGOS 1 FT IM OFFICER 16 NGOS 0 IM OFFICER 27 NGOS 1 PT PH OFFICER 5 UN AGENCIES 1 FT, 2 PT PH OFFICERS 4 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 6 UN AGENCIES 1 PT COMMS OFFICER 0 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 2 PT COMMS OFFICERS 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 0 DONORS 8 DONORS 2 DONORS 0 OBSERVERS 3 OBSERVERS 7 OBSERVERS 0 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 4 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 4 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS Bamenda, Bertoua, Buea, Maroua Bambari, Bangassou, Bria, Kaga-Bandoro CHAD COLOMBIA DEM. REP. OF THE CONGO PROTRACTED 2 UNGRADED GRADE 3 1.8 million 56.3 million 2.1 million 117.8 million 25.6 million 232.1 million PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ 760, 000 17% 226, 000 22% 9.2 million 47% PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED 2007 WHO IRC, MOH 2010 WHO MOH 2006 WHO MDA ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR NATIONAL TEAM: 1 PARTNERS: 31 NATIONAL TEAM: 3 PARTNERS: 63 NATIONAL TEAM: 3 PARTNERS: 79 1 FT COORDINATOR 10 INGOS 1 PT COORDINATOR 42 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 28 INGOS 0 IM OFFICER 6 NGOS 1 PT IM OFFICER 8 NGOS 1 FT, 1 PT IM OFFICER 26 NGOS 0 PH OFFICER 6 UN AGENCIES 1 PT PH OFFICER 8 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 9 UN AGENCIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 0 COMMS OFFICER 6 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 5 DONORS 2 DONORS 5 DONORS 3 OBSERVERS 2 OBSERVERS 5 OBSERVERS 4 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 6 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 4 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS Abeché, Bol, Gore, Sarh Arauca, Cùcuta, Ipiales, Puerto Carreño, Riohacha, San Bukavu, Goma, Kananga, Kalemie Andrés y Providencia ETHIOPIA IRAQ LIBYA GRADE 2 GRADE 2 GRADE 2 10.6 million 195 million 4.1 million 124.2 million 6.7 million 44.7 million PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ 6.6 million 16% 1.3 million 34% 6.7 million 72% PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED 2015 WHO - 2014 WHO - 2015 WHO MOH ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR NATIONAL TEAM: 5 PARTNERS: 35 NATIONAL TEAM: 3 PARTNERS: 52 NATIONAL TEAM: 2 PARTNERS: 27 1 FT COORDINATOR 16 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 18 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 11 INGOS 1 FT IM OFFICER 3 NNGOS 1 FT IM OFFICER 13 NNGOS 1 FT IM OFFICER 0 NNGOS 3 FT PH OFFICERS 8 UN AGENCIES 1 FT PH OFFICER 4 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 6 UN AGENCIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 0 COMMS OFFICER 2 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 4 DONORS 13 DONORS 7 DONORS 3 OBSERVERS 2 OBSERVERS 2 OBSERVERS 15 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 7 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 2 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS Addis Ababa, Afar, Amhara, B Gumuz, D Dawa/ Harari, East Anbar, Dahuk, Erbil, Kirkuk, Ninewah, Salah al-Din, Benghazi, Sebha Guji, East Hararge, East Wollega, Gambela, Oromia, SNNP, Sulaymaniyah Somali, Tigray, West Guji, West Hararge MALI MOZAMBIQUE MYANMAR PROTRACTED 1 GRADE 2 PROTRACTED 2 1.5 million 21.8 million 5.1 million 17.4 million 961,000 41.7 million PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ 1.5 million 18% 2.3 million 44% 915,000 24% PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED 2012 WHO ALIMA 2019 WHO MOH 2012 WHO MOH ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR NATIONAL TEAM: 2 PARTNERS: 74 NATIONAL TEAM: 2 PARTNERS: 20 NATIONAL TEAM: 4 PARTNERS: 76 1 FT COORDINATOR 38 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 7 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 28 INGOS 1 PT IM OFFICER 27 NNGOS 1 FT IM OFFICER 5 NNGOS 1 FT IM OFFICER 13 NNGOS 0 PH OFFICER 4 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 5 UN AGENCIES 1 FT PH OFFICER 10 UN AGENCIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 2 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 1 FT COMMS OFFICER 1 NATIONAL AUTHORITY 1 DONOR 0 DONORS 11 DONORS 2 OBSERVERS 2 OBSERVERS 12 OBSERVERS 6 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 2 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 3 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 1 IGO Gao, Kidal, Menaka, Mopti, Taoudeni, Tombouctou Cabo Delgado Province, Sofala Province Lashio, Myitkyina, Sittwe NIGER NIGERIA OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY GRADE 2 PROTRACTED 3 GRADE 2 2.6 million 24.2 million 5 million 140 million 5 million 74.6 million PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ 1 million 52% 4.5 million 22% 3 million 60% PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED 2010 WHO WVI, MOH 2016 WHO MOH 2009 WHO MOH ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR NATIONAL TEAM: 2 PARTNERS: 43 NATIONAL TEAM: 3 PARTNERS: 54 NATIONAL TEAM: 3 PARTNERS: 104 1 FT COORDINATOR 18 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 12 INGOS 1 FT COORDINATOR 42 INGOS 1 FT 1 PT IM OFFICERS 2 NNGOS 1 FT 1 PT IM OFFICERS 22 NNGOS 2 FT IM OFFICERS 45 NNGOS 0 PH OFFICER 6 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 6 UN AGENCIES 0 PH OFFICER 10 UN AGENCIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 3 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 6 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 0 COMMS OFFICER 2 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES 7 DONORS 5 DONORS 5 DONORS *as of Sept 2020 7 OBSERVERS 3 OBSERVERS 0 OBSERVERS 4 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 3 SUB-NATIONAL HUBS 1 SUB-NATIONAL HUB Diffa, Maradi, Tahoua, Tillabery Adamawa, Borno, Yobe Gaza PACIFIC SOMALIA SOUTH SUDAN REGIONAL COORDINATION MECHANISM GRADE 3 PROTRACTED 3 1 REGIONAL TEAM 2016 1 FT COORDINATOR 3.2 million 103.3 million 3.6 million 214 million ACTIVATED Supporting country-level PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ PEOPLE IN NEED FUNDS REQUESTED US$ coordination and response 2.5 million 35% 2.2 million 27% The Pacific Humanitarian Team (PHT) Health & Nutrition PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED PEOPLE TARGETED FUNDED Cluster is a regional coordination mechanism facilitated by 2006 WHO Save the Children 2010 WHO Save the Children WHO and UNICEF which engages with Ministries of Health and ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR ACTIVATED LEAD CO-COORDINATOR partners across the 21 Pacific island countries and areas (PICs) to support health emergency preparedness and response.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RECORDS CODIFICATION MANUAL Prepared by the Office Of
    RECORDS CODIFICATION MANUAL Prepared by The Office of Communications and Records Department of State (Adopted January 1, 1950—Revised January 1, 1955) I I CLASSES OF RECORDS Glass 0 Miscellaneous. I Class 1 Administration of the United States Government. Class 2 Protection of Interests (Persons and Property). I Class 3 International Conferences, Congresses, Meetings and Organizations. United Nations. Organization of American States. Multilateral Treaties. I Class 4 International Trade and Commerce. Trade Relations, Treaties, Agreements. Customs Administration. Class 5 International Informational and Educational Relations. Cultural I Affairs and Programs. Class 6 International Political Relations. Other International Relations. I Class 7 Internal Political and National Defense Affairs. Class 8 Internal Economic, Industrial and Social Affairs. 1 Class 9 Other Internal Affairs. Communications, Transportation, Science. - 0 - I Note: - Classes 0 thru 2 - Miscellaneous; Administrative. Classes 3 thru 6 - International relations; relations of one country with another, or of a group of countries with I other countries. Classes 7 thru 9 - Internal affairs; domestic problems, conditions, etc., and only rarely concerns more than one I country or area. ' \ \T^^E^ CLASS 0 MISCELLANEOUS 000 GENERAL. Unclassifiable correspondence. Crsnk letters. Begging letters. Popular comment. Public opinion polls. Matters not pertaining to business of the Department. Requests for interviews with officials of the Department. (Classify subjectively when possible). Requests for names and/or addresses of Foreign Service Officers and personnel. Requests for copies of treaties and other publications. (This number should never be used for communications from important persons, organizations, etc.). 006 Precedent Index. 010 Matters transmitted through facilities of the Department, .1 Telegrams, letters, documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity, Development and the Dynamics of Political Domination in Southern Matabeleland
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 19, Issue 4, Ver. III (Apr. 2014), PP 137-149 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.iosrjournals.org Ethnicity, Development and the Dynamics of Political Domination in Southern Matabeleland Clifford Mabhena Institute of Development Studies- National University of Science and Technology-Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Abstract: This article argues that the hegemony of the Shona people in Zimbabwe has been largely influenced by ethnicity and the quest to dominate Matabeleland politically, socially and economically. Development marginalisation of Matabeleland region, I argue has been influenced by ethnicity and politics of revenge. The study used ethnography to collect data and hence in-depth interviews were used as data collection tools. The results of the study indicate that Matabeleland has been largely dominated by the Shona ethnic group, and arguments advanced by scholars for this dominance, it is argued, Ndebele dominated the Shona people in the 19th and 20th centuries. This was due to conquest by the marauding Ndebele warriors under the leadership of King Mzilikazi and latter on King Lobhengula. The ascendance of the Zimbabwe African National Union Patriotic Front (ZANUPF) in the 1980 independence elections opened the gates for the ascendancy of the Shona people as the party was pre-dominantly Shona speaking. The march to state house by the ZANUPF dominated party created a lot of tension between the two ethnic groups; Ndebele and Shona, and hence the lashing out of the fifth brigade in 1983 and 1984 in Matabeleland and Midlands provinces of the country. Key words: Hegemony, ethnicity, internal colonisation, marginalisation I.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Knight-Bruce (1891–1894)
    CHAPTER ONE OCCUPYING THE GROUND: BISHOP KNIGHT-BRUCE (1891–1894) In 1891 the Church of the Province of South Africa (CPSA), a daughter church of the Church of England, expanded into Central Africa. A diocese was created by the Provincial Synod for an area north of the Diocese of Pretoria, which ended at the Limpopo River. This diocese, “for Mashonaland and the surrounding territories”,1 was one of the largest Anglican dioceses in the world. It was roughly the size of France, two-and-a-half times the size of Great Britain (see Map 1, p. xx). The central area of the original diocese is today divided into the fi ve dioceses of the Anglican Church in Zimbabwe (Harare, Matabeleland, Mutare, Central Zimbabwe and Masvingo). Mashonaland itself was little known to the outside world in 1891 and undefi ned, other than by its general topography and the distribu- tion within it of Shona-speaking peoples (‘the Mashona’). At its centre was a large, high plateau, well-wooded and watered. To the north, the land fell away to the Zambezi River; to the east, in the region of the Manyika people rose a mountainous barrier beyond which lay the colony of Portuguese East Africa. Much of the area was dominated by two peoples of Southern, Nguni, origin: the Gaza, in ‘Umzila’s country’ to the south-east;2 and the Ndebele (‘Matabele’), in the south-west (see Map 2, p. xxi). Ndebele territory (Matabeleland) was itself bordered to the south- west, across the Ramokwebana and Shashe Rivers, by territory known as ‘Khama’s country’: Khama was the leading chief of a number of native polities which had come under British infl uence, as the Bechuanaland Protectorate, in 1885.3 To the south-east of Matabeleland and south- west of Gazaland ran the Limpopo River, which served not only as an ecclesiastical boundary between the new Diocese of Mashonaland and 1 ‘The Bishop’s Letter: Resolutions: Section VII’, CMSA 6:64 (April 1891), xxxi.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on China's Strategic Aims in Africa
    HEARING ON CHINA’S STRATEGIC AIMS IN AFRICA HEARING BEFORE THE U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FRIDAY, MAY 8, 2020 Printed for use of the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission Available via the World Wide Web: www.uscc.gov UNITED STATES-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON: 2020 U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION ROBIN CLEVELAND, CHAIRMAN CAROLYN BARTHOLOMEW, VICE CHAIRMAN Commissioners: ANDREAS A. BORGEAS THEA MEI LEE BOB BOROCHOFF KENNETH LEWIS JEFFREY L. FIEDLER HON. JAMES M. TALENT HON. CARTE P. GOODWIN MICHAEL R. WESSEL ROY D. KAMPHAUSEN LARRY M. WORTZEL The Commission was created on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for 2001 § 1238, Public Law No. 106-398, 114 STAT. 1654A-334 (2000) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 7002 (2001), as amended by the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for 2002 § 645 (regarding employment status of staff) & § 648 (regarding changing annual report due date from March to June), Public Law No. 107-67, 115 STAT. 514 (Nov. 12, 2001); as amended by Division P of the “Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003,” Pub L. No. 108-7 (Feb. 20, 2003) (regarding Commission name change, terms of Commissioners, and responsibilities of the Commission); as amended by Public Law No. 109- 108 (H.R. 2862) (Nov. 22, 2005) (regarding responsibilities of Commission and applicability of FACA); as amended by Division J of the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008,” Public Law Nol. 110-161 (December 26, 2007) (regarding responsibilities of the Commission, and changing the Annual Report due date from June to December); as amended by the Carl Levin and Howard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe Market Study: Matabeleland North Province Report
    USAID Zimbabwe USAID RESEARCH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER January 2020 Zimbabwe Market Study: Matabeleland North Province Report Dominica Chingarande, Gift Mugano, Godfrey Chagwiza, Mabel Hungwe Month Year Acknowledgments The research team expresses its gratitude to the various stakeholders that participated in this study in different capacities. Special gratitude goes to the District Food and Nutrition Committee members, the District Drought Relief Committee members, and various market actors in the province for providing invaluable local market information. We further express our gratitude to the Amalima team in Matabeleland North for mobilizing beneficiaries of food assistance who in turn shared their lived experiences with food assistance. To these food assistance beneficiaries, we say thank you for freely sharing your experiences. Research Technical Assistance Center The Research Technical Assistance Center is a network of academic researchers generating timely research for USAID to promote evidence-based policies and programs. The project is led by NORC at the University of Chicago in partnership with Arizona State University, Centro de Investigación de la Universidad del Pacifico (Lima, Peru), Davis Management Group, the DevLab@Duke University, Forum One, the Institute of International Education, the Notre Dame Initiative for Global Development, Population Reference Bureau, the Resilient Africa Network at Makerere University (Kampala, Uganda), the United Negro College Fund, the University of Chicago, and the University of Illinois at Chicago. The Research Technical Assistance Center (RTAC) is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of contract no. 7200AA18R00023. This report was produced by Dominica Chingarande, Gift Mugano, Godfrey Chagwiza, and Mabel Hungwe.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography
    Table 2. Geographic Areas, and Biography The following numbers are never used alone, but may be used as required (either directly when so noted or through the interposition of notation 09 from Table 1) with any number from the schedules, e.g., public libraries (027.4) in Japan (—52 in this table): 027.452; railroad transportation (385) in Brazil (—81 in this table): 385.0981. They may also be used when so noted with numbers from other tables, e.g., notation 025 from Table 1. When adding to a number from the schedules, always insert a decimal point between the third and fourth digits of the complete number SUMMARY —001–009 Standard subdivisions —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas —2 Biography —3 Ancient world —4 Europe —5 Asia —6 Africa —7 North America —8 South America —9 Australasia, Pacific Ocean islands, Atlantic Ocean islands, Arctic islands, Antarctica, extraterrestrial worlds —001–008 Standard subdivisions —009 History If “history” or “historical” appears in the heading for the number to which notation 009 could be added, this notation is redundant and should not be used —[009 01–009 05] Historical periods Do not use; class in base number —[009 1–009 9] Geographic treatment and biography Do not use; class in —1–9 —1 Areas, regions, places in general; oceans and seas Not limited by continent, country, locality Class biography regardless of area, region, place in —2; class specific continents, countries, localities in —3–9 > —11–17 Zonal, physiographic, socioeconomic regions Unless other instructions are given, class
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers, Settlers, Aliens, Exiles: the Decolonisation of White Identity In
    Pioneers, Settlers, Aliens, Exiles J. L. Fisher Pioneers, Settlers, Aliens, Exiles The decolonisation of white identity in Zimbabwe J. L. Fisher THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/pioneers_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fisher, J. L. (Josephine Lucy) Title: Pioneers, settlers, aliens, exiles : the decolonisation of white identity in Zimbabwe / J. L. Fisher. ISBN: 9781921666148 (pbk.) 9781921666155 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Decolonization--Zimbabwe. Whites--Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe--Politics and government--1980- Zimbabwe--Race relations. Dewey Number: 320.96891 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Abbreviations. ix Preface . xi 1 ..Introduction. 1 2 ..Zimbabwe’s.discourse.of.national.reconciliation . 27 3 ..Re-inscribing.the.national.landscape. 55 4 ..Zimbabwe’s.narrative.of.national.rebirth. 79 5 ..Decolonising.settler.citizenship. 103 6 ..The.mobilisation.of.indigeneity. 131 7 ..The.loss.of.certainty. 173 8 ..Zimbabwe’s.governance.and.land.reform.crises—a.postscript.201
    [Show full text]
  • CONIFA As a Platform for Football Diplomacy
    The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15 (2020) 329-354 brill.com/hjd Para- and Proto-Sports Diplomacy of Contested Territories: CONIFA as a Platform for Football Diplomacy Ramesh Ganohariti School of Law and Government, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland [email protected] Ernst Dijxhoorn Institute of Security and Global Affairs, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] Received: 26 November 2019; revised: 21 April 2020; accepted: 23 May 2020 Summary International relations and sport have become increasingly intertwined, with sport and sports events being used for various diplomatic and political goals. Yet, member- ship of FIFA and the IOC is largely organised along lines of sovereign statehood. Like other fora of diplomacy, this excludes contested territories that wish to engage in di- plomacy for various political, economic, and cultural reasons. Yet, these entities can engage in international sports (diplomacy) through membership of the Confederation of Independent Football Associations (CONIFA). This paper finds that while the par- ticipating entities often make a political statement, there is little evidence that par- ticipation in CONIFA has positively impacted their foreign policy goals. Furthermore, beyond CONIFA, contested territories have been unable to advance their sporting sov- ereignty or engage in diplomatic relations with recognised states. However, CONIFA aids in nation branding through hosting rights and media attention, and contributes to strengthening the ‘national’ identity
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Land Mammals Tanganyika Territory Zanzibar
    274 G. H. SWYNNERTON,F.Z.S., Checklist oj Land Mammals VOL. XX A Checklist of the Land Mammals OF mE Tanganyika Territory AND mE Zanzibar Protectorate By G. H. SWYNNERTON, F.Z.S., Game Warde:z, Game Preservation Department, Tanganyika Territory, and R. W. HAYMAN, F.Z.S., Senior Experimental Officer, Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History) 277278·.25111917122896 .· · 4 . (1)(3)(-)(2)(5)(9)(3)(4)280290281283286289295288291 280. .. CONTENTS· · · No. OF FORMS* 1. FOREWORDINSECTIVORA ErinaceidaM:,gadermatidaEmballonuridaSoricidt:eMacroscelididaMarossidaNycteridaHipposideridaRhinolophidaVespertilionida(Shrews)(Free-tailed(Hollow-faced(Hedgehogs)(Horseshoe(Leaf-nosed(Sheath-tailed(Elephant(Simple-nosed(Big-earedBats)Bats)Shrews)BatsBats)Bats) Pteropodida (Fruit-eating Bats) 2.3. INTRODUCTIONSYSTEMATICLIST OF SPECIESAND SUBSPECIES: PAGE CHIROPTERA Chrysochlorida (Golden" Moles to) ···302306191210.3521. ·2387 . · 6 · IAN. (1)(2)1951(-)(4)(21)(1)(6)(14)(6)(5),(7)(8)333310302304306332298305309303297337324325336337339211327 . SWYNNERTON,. P.Z.S.,·· ·Checklist··· of·Land 3293Mammals52 275 PItIMATES G. It. RhinocerotidaPelidaEchimyidaHyanidaPongidaCercopithecidaHystricidaMuridaHominidaAnomaluridaPedetidaCaviidaMustelidaGliridaSciuridaViverrida(Cats,(Mice,(Dormice)(Guinea-pigs)(Apes)(Squirrels)(Spring(Hyaenas,(Genets,(Man)(Polecats,(Cane(porcupines)(Flying(Rhinoceroses)Leopards,(Monkeys,Rats,Haas)Rats)Civets,Arad-wolf).Weasels,Squirrels)Gerbils,Lions,Baboons)Mongooses)Ratels,etc.)•Cheetahs)..Otters) ProcaviidaCanidaLeporidaElephantidaLorisidaOrycteropodidaEquidaBathyergidaManida
    [Show full text]
  • Warhurst, PR, Colonial Office & British Expansion, the Zambezi, 1885
    UNIVERSITY OF RHODESIA HENDERSON SEMINAR NO. 45 SEMINAR: 30 MARCH 1979. THE COLONIAL OFFICE AND BRITISH EXPANSION TO THE ZAMBEZI, 1835- 91^ by: P. R. Warhurst ROBINSON AND GALLAGHER, in their seminal work Africa and the Victorians/ detect a certain ambivalence in British policy towards the interior of southern Africa. Describing the 'ambivalent attitude to the Transvaal* shown by Colonial Secretary Knutsford as 'typical of British policy from 1880 to 1895', they write: / He feared, on the one hand, to strain relations with the republic too far, lest he provoke Boer anti- imperialism and Anglo-Dutch strife throughout South Africa. On the other hand, he felt bound to limit the republic’s occupation of the interior, in order to protect colonial interests and uphold imperial influence.^ Though stressing the reluctant imperialism of the British Government, they never­ theless accept that containment of the Transvaal became the goal of the Colonial Office once the Boer republic was perceived as a threat to British hegemony. The j purpose of this article is to examine attitudes and policies within the Colonial Office, relations between the Colonial and Foreign Offices, and the part played by the High Commissioners for South Africa in British expansion into the area between the Limpopo and the Zambezi, This throws sane new light on Colonial Office policy and helps to elucidate the question, 'Hew reluctant was Britain's "reluctant imperialism"?' The Colonial Office had first ccneid^vea expansion into the interior in 1878 when the High Cariidssioner, Sir Barbie Frere, preposed the creation of a protectorate as far as Lake N g a m in tire north, and from the Transvaal to the Atlantic.2 However, when the Gladstone Ministry came to power they renounced expansionist ambitions and in 1881 retroceded the Transvaal to the Boers.
    [Show full text]
  • Zimbabwe: Current Issues
    Order Code RL32723 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Zimbabwe: Current Issues Updated March 11, 2005 Jeffrey Townsend Research Associate Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Raymond W. Copson Specialist in International Relations Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Zimbabwe: Current Issues Summary Parliamentary elections are scheduled in Zimbabwe for March 31, 2005, and they will be closely watched by supporters of human rights and democracy. The last parliamentary election, in June 2000, was marred by violence against the opposition and other irregularities. According to the Department of State, the presidential election in March 2002 was “preceded and followed by a government-sanctioned campaign of violence directed towards supporters and potential supporters of the opposition.” Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has labeled Zimbabwe an “outpost of tyranny,” and the United States has enforced targeted sanctions against top Zimbabwe officials and associates since 2002. Moreover, the Administration has urged South Africa’s President Thabo Mbeki to lead a regional effort to promote democracy and human rights in Zimbabwe. Should the 2005 voting again prove violent or manifestly unfair, some may advocate stronger measures. Zimbabwe is a land-locked, primarily agricultural southern African country of 12.7 million people, and has been ruled by its current President, Robert Mugabe, since a majority-rule political system was established — following a long civil war - in 1980. Since the late 1990s, the Mugabe government has pursued a controversial land expropriation policy that has contributed to a sharp and continuing economic decline. GDP declined by 30% from 1998 through 2003, and fell another 5.2% in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update
    COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update Data as received by WHO from national authorities, as of 22 November 2020, 10 am CET For the latest data and information on COVID-19, please see: • WHO COVID-19 Dashboard • WHO COVID-19 Weekly Operational Update Global epidemiological situation This past week, the global acceleration in case incidence has slowed down, with around 4 million new cases reported; however, death rates continue to increase with over 67 000 new deaths reported (Figure 1). The European and South East Asia Regions continued downward trends in weekly cases; however, the European Region remains the largest contributor to new cases and new deaths in the past 7 days. The Region of the Americas reported increases in both new cases and new deaths and the Region continues to account for the greatest proportion of cumulative cases and deaths. While cases numbers remain relatively low, the African Region reported the highest increase in new cases (15%) and deaths (30%) this week. The Eastern Mediterranean and Western Pacific regions also reported an increase in new cases and deaths this week. As of 22 November there have been over 57.8 million cases and 1.3 million deaths reported globally since the start of the pandemic. Figure 1: COVID-19 cases reported weekly by WHO Region, and global deaths, as of 22 November 2020** 4 500 000 80 000 Americas 4 000 000 South-East Asia 70 000 Europe 3 500 000 60 000 Eastern Mediterranean 3 000 000 Africa 50 000 2 500 000 Western Pacific Deaths 40 000 Cases 2 000 000 Deaths 30 000 1 500 000 20 000 1 000 000 500 000 10 000 0 0 6-Jul 7-Sep 9-Nov 2-Mar 27-Jul 4-May 13-Apr 19-Oct 20-Jan 15-Jun 10-Feb 17-Aug 28-Sep 30-Dec 23-Mar 25-May Reported week commencing **See data table and figure notes.
    [Show full text]