An Environmental History of Toronto's Don River Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Environmental History of Toronto's Don River Valley Imagined Futures and Unintended Consequences: An Environmental History of Toronto’s Don River Valley by Jennifer Leigh Bonnell A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto © Copyright by Jennifer Leigh Bonnell 2010 Imagined Futures and Unintended Consequences: An Environmental History of Toronto’s Don River Valley Jennifer Leigh Bonnell Doctor of Philosophy Department of Theory and Policy Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University of Toronto 2010 Abstract This dissertation explores human interactions with Toronto’s Don River Valley from the late eighteenth century to the present, focusing on the period of intense urbanization and industrialization between 1880 and 1940. Its concentration on the urban fringe generates new perspectives on the social and environmental consequences of urban development. From its position on the margins, the Don performed vital functions for the urban economy as a provider of raw materials and a sink for wastes. Insights derived from the intersections between social and environmental history are at the heart of this project. The dissertation begins by documenting the industrial history of the river and its transformation from a central provider in the lives of early Toronto residents to a polluted periphery in the latter half of the nineteenth century. An analysis of the valley’s related function as a repository for human “undesirables” reveals connections between the processes that identified certain individuals as deficient “others” and similar imperatives at work in classifying difficult or unpredictable environments as “waste spaces.” Efforts to “reclaim” and improve the river are the subject of the remaining chapters. A series of initiatives between 1870 and 1930 aimed at reconfiguring the lower Don as an efficient corridor for transportation and industrial development reveal in their shortcomings and ii unintended consequences a failure to accommodate dynamic and often unpredictable ecological processes. Reclamations of a different kind are explored in the conservation movement of the twentieth century, through which the valley emerges as a valuable public amenity. The dissertation concludes by investigating how the valley’s history informs current plans to “renaturalize” the river mouth. Throughout, the Don functions as an autonomous and causal force in the city’s history. On this small river on the urban fringe, nature and society worked in mutually constitutive ways to shape and reshape the metropolis. iii Acknowledgments The mental image of the dedicated scholar labouring away in isolation is a misleading representation of projects such as this one. While I was the one who willed herself to sit still and write, a number of people helped to make that writing both possible and pleasurable. Thanks go first to a supportive committee who from the beginning infused the project with a sense of excitement and possibility, and whose faith in me didn’t flag even as I announced two pregnancies over the course of the project. My supervisor, Ruth Sandwell, helped me to see the possibilities of a place like the Don. Her insightful appreciation of key issues in historical practice, and her dedication to the integrity of past actors, challenged me to think more deeply about the people and places I studied. Just as important, her enthusiastic support for my work in various venues, and her sensitivity to the particular challenges of balancing dissertation work with family responsibilities, made working together a great pleasure. Bill Turkel’s interest in the project from an early stage, his expansive knowledge and his unconventional approach to academic endeavours nurtured the development of this project and helped to shape its guiding arguments. Finally, for her keen critical eye and her constructive comments as this dissertation has progressed, I would like to thank Cecilia Morgan. Generous funding provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council’s Canada Graduate Scholarship and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program granted me the luxury of unencumbered time to dedicate to research and writing. Later in the project, support from the Canadian Federation of University Women helped greatly in the final months of writing. The research and writing of this dissertation was greatly facilitated by the knowledgeable assistance of Toronto-area archivists and librarians. Thanks to staff at the City of Toronto iv Archives, especially John Huzil and Lawrence Lee, whose knowledge of the area helped to build my understanding. Michael Moir, Archivist at York University’s Clara Thomas Archives and Special Collections, provided generously of his time in sharing his detailed knowledge of the Toronto waterfront. I would also like to thank Jeff Hubbell at the Toronto Port Authority Archives, and Sean Smith at the Archives of Ontario, for kind assistance and support. Early on in my research, I found myself at the Toronto Reference Library, printing and taping together fire insurance atlases in an attempt to make sense of what was a dynamic and confusing industrial landscape. Generous and patient assistance from University of Toronto GIS and Map Librarian Marcel Fortin opened up a world of possibilities in using GIS to achieve the same ends. With financial support from the Network in Canadian History and Environment (NiCHE) and skilled assistance from University of Toronto Geography student Jordan Hale, we produced the Don Valley Historical Mapping Project (http://maps.library.utoronto.ca/dvhmp/), a database of geo-spatial information on the environmental and industrial history of the Don watershed. The project greatly facilitated my ability to interpret the historical geography of the area. It remains a resource for a broader community of researchers seeking geographic information on the Don Valley and Toronto’s east end. A number of other people deserve mention here. Gene Desfor supported this project in multiple ways, allocating funds for archival image purchases from his collaborative “Changing Urban Waterfronts” project (funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council), commenting on chapter drafts, and sharing his deep knowledge and passion for the history of Toronto’s waterfront. Wendy Wickwire’s passionate advocacy for her students is renown; I am thankful to have been one of them. I would like to thank Larry MacDonald, who many years ago now sparked my interest in history. Thanks also to John Wilson of the Task Force to Bring Back the Don, Helen Mills of Lost Rivers, and Adele Freeman, Amy Thurston, and Ken Dion of the v Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, for their support and assistance at various points in my research. For their understanding and encouragement, thanks to friends Kristin Lindell, Erika Cordes, and Anya Kater. Fellow graduate students in Canadian and environmental history brought great pleasure to the process of writing this thesis. Thanks especially to Ben Bradley, Jim Clifford, and Jay Young, who provided insightful comments on earlier drafts of this work, and helped me to draw out its major conclusions. Collegial support was also found at the meetings of the Toronto and Area Environmental History Reading Group, and the Changing Urban Waterfronts group. For revelry, gossip, and encouragement, thanks to the women of the Toronto Area Women’s Canadian History Group. Finally, thanks to Alison Norman, who would like to be remembered here as much more than an office mate. There are few other people I’d choose to share a closet- sized office with. Last and most, thanks go to my family. Support from Betty and Morley Singer gave me the opportunity to pursue graduate work. Gail Singer provided humour, good company, and fantastic meals throughout the project. My mother, Pam Bonnell, helped me to remember and celebrate the important things, and gave her big-hearted support to all of us over the course of the project. Will and Maya, who arrived like bookends near the beginning and the end of this project, brought joy and welcome distraction in many late afternoons at the playground, and never failed to remind me where my priorities lay. To Scott go my greatest thanks, for his encouragement and his endurance throughout this project, and for his willingness to create the time and space in a busy family life for me to think, and write. This thesis is dedicated to my father, Rick Bonnell, whose support for me and this project I could feel across the many long miles that separate Vancouver Island from Toronto, and whose faith in me I’ve never doubted. vi Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1 Moving from the Source: Methods for a River History...................................................................1 Part I: Headwaters Chapter 2 Pine Forests, Clay Pits and Running Water: The Don Provides, 1793
Recommended publications
  • Official Election Results
    2012 General Election Official Results These are the official results of the 1st General Election of the City Youth Council of Toronto which took place from October 15, 2012 to October 21, 2012. Quorum for the election was set at 100 votes cast per candidate running in the ward (i.e. if 3 candidates are running, quorum was set at 300 votes cast). All candidates who registered, including those who withdrew from the election, are listed in alphabetical order. The winner is highlighted in bold. Candidates who withdrew their candidacy, transferred wards, or failed to confirm their candidacy on or before the nomination deadline (October 1, 2012) are listed in grey. Ward 1 - Etobicoke North Name of Candidate # of Votes % of Valid Votes Parekh, Mann 208 53.06% Poologarajah, Aena 184 46.94% Siva, Saraniya -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- Sri, Sathuya -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- Spoiled Ballots = 29 Total Votes Cast = 421 Ward 2 - Etobicoke North Name of Candidate # of Votes % of Ward Votes Abukar, Munira -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- Agyemang, Kwaku -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- Cabalse, Daniel -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- Chan, Bernard -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- Duraisingam, Angelo 12 54.55% Redlich, Hannah 10 45.45% Sanderson, Dalton -- withdrew -- -- withdrew -- [did not reach quorum] Spoiled Ballots = 8 Total Votes Cast = 30 * This ward will remain vacant until a by-election date is set by the Youth Council at their regular meeting in November. City Youth Council of Toronto | Accountability ● Integrity ● Respect ● Transparency | www.cycto.ca
    [Show full text]
  • 3131 Lower Don River West Lower Don River West 4.0 DESCRIPTION
    Lower Don River West Environmental Study Report Remedial Flood Protection Project 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF LOWER DON 4.1 The Don River Watershed The Don River is one of more than sixty rivers and streams flowing south from the Oak Ridges Moraine. The River is approximately 38 km long and outlets into the Keating Channel, which then conveys the flows into Toronto Harbour and Lake Historic Watershed Ontario. The entire drainage basin of the Don urbanization of the river's headwaters in York River is 360 km2. Figure 4.1 and Figure 4.2, on the Region began in the early 1980s and continues following pages, describe the existing and future today. land use conditions within the Don River Watershed. Hydrologic changes in the watershed began when settlers converted the forests to agricultural fields; For 200 years, the Don Watershed has been many streams were denuded even of bank side subject to intense pressures from human vegetation. Urban development then intensified settlement. These have fragmented the river the problems of warmer water temperatures, valley's natural branching pattern; degraded and erosion, and water pollution. Over the years often destroyed its once rich aquatic and during the three waves of urban expansion, the terrestrial wildlife habitat; and polluted its waters Don River mouth, originally an extensive delta with raw sewage, industrial/agricultural marsh, was filled in and the lower portion of the chemicals, metals and other assorted river was straightened. contaminants. Small Don River tributaries were piped and Land clearing, settlement, and urbanization have buried, wetlands were "reclaimed," and springs proceeded in three waves in the Don River were lost.
    [Show full text]
  • POST-ELECTION REPORT “Ontario Election” by Knehcsg Is Licensed Under 2.0 CC BY-SA
    POST-ELECTION REPORT “Ontario Election” by knehcsg is licensed under 2.0 CC BY-SA METHODOLOGY CONTACT INFORMATION The analysis in this report is based on results of a survey conducted on In Ottawa: June 28th-30th, and July 14-16th 2018 among a sample of 3005 adults, Quito Maggi, President 18 years of age or older, living in the electoral districts of Don Valley East, [email protected] Don Valley West, Etobicoke North, Mississauga-Erin Mills, Mississauga– In Toronto: Malton, Mississauga Centre, Ottawa South, Scarborough–Guildwood, Dr. Joseph Angolano, Vice President Scarborough Centre, and Scarborough Southwest, as well as 1846 Muslims [email protected] in the province. The survey was conducted using automated telephone interviews (Smart IVR). Respondents were interviews on landlines and Find us online at: cellular phones. The survey is intended to represent the voting population • www.mainstreetresearch.ca in these ten ridings. • twitter.com/MainStResearch • facebook.com/mainstreetresearch The margin of error for the poll is +/- 1.78% at the 95% confidence level. Margins of error are higher in each subsample. The Canadian Muslim Vote: Totals may not add up 100% due to rounding. Ali Manek, Executive Director, [email protected] ABOUT MAINSTREET Hussein Allidina, Board Member, With 20 years of political experience in all three levels of government, [email protected] President and CEO Quito Maggi is a respected commentator on international public affairs. Differentiated by its large sample sizes, Mainstreet Research has provided accurate snapshots of public opinion, having predicted a majority NDP government in Alberta, and was the only polling firm to correctly predict a Liberal majority government in the 2015 federal election.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto to Have the Canadian Jewish News Area Canada Post Publication Agreement #40010684 Havdalah: 7:53 Delivered to Your Door Every Week
    SALE FOR WINTER $1229 including 5 FREE hotel nights or $998* Air only. *subject to availabilit/change Call your travel agent or EL AL. 416-967-4222 60 Pages Wednesday, September 26, 2007 14 Tishrei, 5768 $1.00 This Week Arbour slammed by two groups National Education continues Accused of ‘failing to take a balanced approach’ in Mideast conflict to be hot topic in campaign. Page 3 ognizing legitimate humanitarian licly against the [UN] Human out publicly about Iran’s calls for By PAUL LUNGEN needs of the Palestinians, we regret Rights Council’s one-sided obses- genocide.” The opportunity was Rabbi Schild honoured for Staff Reporter Arbour’s repeated re- sion with slamming there, he continued, because photos 60 years of service Page 16 sort to a one-sided Israel. As a former published after the event showed Louise Arbour, the UN high com- narrative that denies judge, we urge her Arbour, wearing a hijab, sitting Bar mitzvah boy helps missioner for Human Rights, was Israelis their essential to adopt a balanced close to the Iranian president. Righteous Gentile. Page 41 slammed by two watchdog groups right to self-defence.” approach.” Ahmadinejad was in New York last week for failing to take a bal- Neuer also criti- Neuer was refer- this week to attend a UN confer- Heebonics anced approach to the Arab-Israeli cized Arbour, a former ring to Arbour’s par- ence. His visit prompted contro- conflict and for ignoring Iran’s long- Canadian Supreme ticipation in a hu- versy on a number of fronts. Co- standing call to genocide when she Court judge, for miss- man rights meeting lumbia University, for one, came in attended a human rights conference ing an opportunity to of the Non-Aligned for a fair share of criticism for invit- in Tehran earlier this month.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politicization of the Scarborough Rapid Transit Line in Post-Suburban Toronto
    THE ‘TOONERVILLE TROLLEY’: THE POLITICIZATION OF THE SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT LINE IN POST-SUBURBAN TORONTO Peter Voltsinis 1 “The world is watching.”1 A spokesperson for the Province of Ontario’s (the Province) Urban Transportation Development Corporation (UTDC) uttered those poignant words on March 21, 1985, one day before the Toronto Transit Commission’s (TTC) inaugural opening of the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) line.2 One day later, Ontario Deputy Premier Robert Welch gave the signal to the TTC dispatchers to send the line’s first trains into the Scarborough Town Centre Station, proclaiming that it was “a great day for Scarborough and a great day for public transit.”3 For him, the SRT was proof that Ontario can challenge the world.4 This research essay outlines the development of the SRT to carve out an accurate place for the infrastructure project in Toronto’s planning history. I focus on the SRT’s development chronology, from the moment of the Spadina Expressway’s cancellation in 1971 to the opening of the line in 1985. Correctly classifying what the SRT represents in Toronto’s planning history requires a clear vision of how the project emerged. To create that image, I first situate my research within Toronto’s dominant historiographical planning narratives. I then synthesize the processes and phenomena, specifically postmodern planning and post-suburbanization, that generated public transit alternatives to expressway development in Toronto in the 1970s. Building on my synthesis, I present how the SRT fits into that context and analyze the changing landscape of Toronto land-use politics in the 1970s and early-1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • James T. Lemon Fonds
    University of Toronto Archives and Records Management Services James T. Lemon Fonds Prepared by: Marnee Gamble Nov. 1995 Revised Nov. 2005 Revised Nov 2016 © University of Toronto Archives and Records Management Services 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE…………………………………………………………………………1 SCOPE AND CONTENT………………………………………………………………………...2 Series 1 Biographical……………………………………………………………………….3 Series 2 Correspondence…………………………………………………………………...3 Series 3 Conferences and speaking engagements…………………………………………...4 Series 4 Publishing Activities………………………………………………………………4 Series 5 Reviews…………………………………………………………………………...5 Series 6 Research Grants…………………………………………………………………..5 Series 7 Teaching Files……………………………………………………………………..5 Series 8 Student Files………………………………………………………………………6 Series 9 References………………………………………………………………………...6 Series 10 Department of Geography………………………………………………………..7 Series 11 University of Toronto…………………………………………………………….7 Series 12 Professional Associations and Community Groups………………………………8 Series 13 New Democratic Party…………………………………………………………...8 Series 14 Christian Youth Groups………………………………………………………….8 Series 15 Family Papers…………………………………………………………………….9 Appendix 1 Series 12: Professional Associations and Community Groups 10 Appendix 2 Series 7 : Teaching student essays B1984-0027, B1986-0015, B1988-0054 12 University of Toronto Archives James T. Lemon Fonds BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Raised in West Lorne, Ontario, James (Jim) Thomas Lemon attended the University of Western Ontario where he received his Bachelor of Arts in Geography (1955). He later attended the University of Wisconsin where he received a Master of Science in Geography (1961) as well as his Ph.D. (1964). In 1967, after having worked as an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Prof. Lemon joined the University of Toronto Geography Department, where he remained until his retirement in 1994. His career has been spent in the field of urban historical geography of which he has written numerous articles, papers and chapters in books.
    [Show full text]
  • Breathing New Life Into
    Breathing New Life into 2003 Don Watershed Report Card A Message to Those Who Cherish the Don If you brought this report card home to your parents, you would be sent to bed without dinner. Far too many Cs and Ds, not a single A, and — heaven forbid — an F, glaring from the page. But restoration is hardly a series of simple questions and answers that can easily be slotted into good or bad, right or wrong. It's much more than that. It takes a longer view. The grades are nowhere near good enough, true, but some very important groundwork has been laid in the past 10 years to ensure major strides from here on. First off, let's address that F. We know we can do better in caring for water, and now, we have a means to improve that grade through the recently completed Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan for the City of Toronto. Once it's put in place, water quality will improve substantially, not only in the Don River, but everything it feeds. The plan will take at least 25 years to implement; we still must include the munici- palities outside of Toronto into a broader watershed plan. Bold commitments by federal, provincial, and municipal governments must be made to ensure we have the resources required to really make this happen. There are quantifiable victories as well. Thanks to changes to five weirs, salmon and other fish now migrate more freely up the Don for the first time in a century. We have seen the completion of the first phase of the Don Valley Brick Works, and a number of other regeneration projects: Little German Mills Creek, The Bartley Smith Greenway, Milne Hollow, and the establishment of the Charles Sauriol Nature Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Field Naturalists 20 College St., Unit 4 Toronto, Ont
    TORONTO FIELD NATURALIST Number 422 October 1991 ✓. · -...___~ ~-::;:~=---~~ ..;~-~~-----· .... ~~✓w,~- Inside Amphibians & reptiles 8 Plants 5,14,17,2J,24,25 Birds 1,6,7,9,24,26-27 Reading 9- 10 Coming events 29 TFN - meetings 2 Don watershed 18-22,24 newsletter submissions 15 Invertebrates 6,13,15,23,25 outings 2,3-5 Issues 6,11-15,16,17,26-27 Weather 28 TFN 422 - 2 TFN MEETINGS Monday, October 7 - THE GEOLOGY OF WASTE: THE GARBAGE CRISIS IN ONTAR I O a t 8 pm an illustrated lecture by Dr. Nick Eyles from Scarborough College of the University of Toronto 155 College St. Dr. Eyles has done extensive research on the Scarborough bluffs and the Don Valley Brick Yard. He is an expert on ground water 6th floor auditorium -- a topic which we should all know roore about. It is only by understanding roore about the irovernent of water underground that we can avoid polluting our drinking water supplies when we locate garbage dumps in unsuitable places. Come and bring your friends with you to this ~rtant meeting. - from 7 IXl1 to 8 IXl1 TFN holds a social hour just outside the lecture auditorium - memberships and publications are for sale - a display of the art of Jean McGill Next Meeting: Monday, November 4, 1991 FOR ENJO YMENT OF TFN OUTINGS, REMEMBER THE FOLLOWING: free camera TTC RIDE GUIDE thermos or flask Metro map notebook &pen snack - Bring your family ~ keys and/or friends NO pets money TTC fare TO HELP PR OTECT THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, CONTACT THE FOLL OWING: air or wa ter pollution complaints: 424-3000 debris in valleys: 661-6600 TFN 422 - 3 TFNOUTINGS October Wednesday BES'IVIEW - nature walk East Don, North York Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ward 21 Green Map
    Ward 21 Green Map Legend Briar Hill Ave 1 Green Points of Interest d d v d v l R O l Ave B Ridelle B k r v d d d d u Houses with Green Features a t e s R o r R R R × rd t P i u t d e d n a h n d t o l o l n o a e o o O g Other Buildings with Green Features w o a M m w R r a w w r n d u L r e B e Dr N Elm Ridge a M F EcoSchools Kay Gardner Beltline Park ¹º Aldburn Rd Shallmar Blvd 1 Shopping and Dining 1 Ridge Hill Dr d d Other Green Businesses R R re Ave d Whitmo p n V o R Old Forest Hill Rd e e t l st l s l l d n a i e D A e Community Organizations r R H r l C d r l e v A i a h d e Wembley R H n g e i 2 e l l r k r e G l r i Community Gardens a P a M 1 3 1 a Eglinton Ave W F 1 3 r 1 d 3 2 D d R N d R o a R l Green Infrastructure l R l l se i d Ben Nobleman r t s l d e l o i H à R m e R l Park v V H w r n a r i r i Chadwick Ave d e r e r ry ¡© Bike Shelter a e n d R v d t s Gloucester Grv L e v l e R b m l o a i o e M t a r e P Ave n C e R Dewbourn H s e e C Carsharing Services n e n i e rn l W e d r t G l a i h 2 Ava Rd G Topographic Features C d e v R A e St Pl A Lake Iroquois Shoreline v ra l l va w y 3 i r A t e a t h i Ava Rd H t e C A v m e a re rn ve G Lost Rivers (approximate) n n h a c l s i e s n l R e i D r o d R n W W R a e a yr Other Features v rw Robinwood Ave ic R A k Ave d n Elderwood Dr Bikeways (on and off street) o t Ma Elderwood Dr g rk n i d Cedarvale al Trails and Walkways e A l r A Park ve Silverwood Ave t S t Parks and Open Spaces s r Cro u h Ardmore Rd yd t 2 on Ward 21 Boundaries R r a d B D a t C s as e tl V e F refers to the many original streams, ran 'Lost rivers' k B Burton Rd ro creeks, and brooks that have been buried over the ok W Pe ind (lo od Rd years due to increased development in many ley A He st Ridgewo v at r re e hda ive cities around the world, including Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish Communities of the Toronto Waterfront: Summary and Assessment 1989 - 2005
    THE FISH COMMUNITIES OF THE TORONTO WATERFRONT: SUMMARY AND ASSESSMENT 1989 - 2005 SEPTEMBER 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank the many technical staff, past and present, of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Ministry of Natural Resources who diligently collected electrofishing data for the past 16 years. The completion of this report was aided by the Canada Ontario Agreement (COA). 1 Jason P. Dietrich, 1 Allison M. Hennyey, 1 Rick Portiss, 1 Gord MacPherson, 1 Kelly Montgomery and 2 Bruce J. Morrison 1 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 5 Shoreham Drive, Downsview, ON, M3N 1S4, Canada 2 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Lake Ontario Fisheries Management Unit, Glenora Fisheries Station, Picton, ON, K0K 2T0, Canada © Toronto and Region Conservation 2008 ABSTRACT Fish community metrics collected for 16 years (1989 — 2005), using standardized electrofishing methods, throughout the greater Toronto region waterfront, were analyzed to ascertain the current state of the fish community with respect to past conditions. Results that continue to indicate a degraded or further degrading environment include an overall reduction in fish abundance, a high composition of benthivores, an increase in invasive species, an increase in generalist species biomass, yet a decrease in specialist species biomass, and a decrease in cool water Electrofishing in the Toronto Harbour thermal guild species biomass in embayments. Results that may indicate a change in a positive community health direction include no significant changes to species richness, a marked increase in diversity in embayments, a decline in non-native species in embayments and open coasts (despite the invasion of round goby), a recent increase in native species biomass, fluctuating native piscivore dynamics, increased walleye abundance, and a reduction in the proportion of degradation tolerant species.
    [Show full text]
  • Fam Altout Last YORK 200 ~Tyojtk
    ~~ ----.~ ~ciIudiq Fam altout lAST YORK 200 ~tyOJtk TODMORDENMILLS IIlust. courtesy of Todmorden Mills Heritage Museum EAST YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY FASCINATING FACTS ABOUT EAST YORK It..T~ Fascinating Facts About East York is one of the Iiii r numerous events at the Library in celebrating IAIT TORK 200 "East York 200". The list is very selective and we apolo­ gize for any oversights. Our aim is to take you through­ out the Borough and back through time to encounter a compendium of unique people, places and things. S. Walter Stewart Branch Area 1. Why is East York celebrating 200 years in 1996? In July of 1796, two brothers, Isaiah and Aaron Skinner were given permission to build a grist mill in the Don Valley, which they proceeded to do that winter. This began an industrial complex of paper mill, grist mill, brewery and distillery with later additions. In 1996, East York is celebrating 200 years of community. The Eastwood and Skinner mill, ca. 1877 from Torofilo IIIl1Slraled POSI & Prcsetl/. Metropolitan Toronto Reference Library 2. What is the area of East York? East York covers a physical area of2,149.7 hectares (8.3 square miles). Of the six municipalities comprising the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, East York is the smallest in size, area-wise. 3. What are the symbols on the East York Coat of Arms and what do they signify? The British bulldog, from the Township of East York signifies the tenacity and courage of early settlers from Britain. The white rose of York is a symbol of peace from the settlers' homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • LPRO E-Newsletter Feb 15 2021
    E-Newsletter 15 February 2021 http://www.lyttonparkro.ca/ The Lytton Park Residents’ Organization (LPRO) is an incorporated non-profit association, representing member households from Lawrence Avenue West to Roselawn and Briar Hill Avenues, Yonge Street to Saguenay and Proudfoot Avenue. We care about protecting and advancing the community’s interests and fostering a sense of neighbourhood in our area. We work together to make our community stronger, sharing information about our community issues and events. “Together we do make a difference!” Keeping Our Community Connected: Follow us on Twitter! Our Twitter handle is @LyttonParkRO LPRO’s Community E-Newsletter - It’s FREE! If you do not already receive the LPRO’s E-Newsletter and would like to receive it directly, please register your email address at www.lyttonparkro.ca/newsletter-sign-up or send us an email to [email protected]. Please share this newsletter with neighbours! Check out LPRO’s New Website! Click HERE Community Residents’ Association Membership - Renew or Join for 2021 As a non-profit organization run by community volunteers, we rely on your membership to cover our costs to advocate for the community, provide newsletters, lead an annual community yard sale and a ravine clean-up, organize speaker events and host election candidate debates. Please join or renew your annual membership. The membership form and details on how to pay the $30 annual fee are on the last page of this newsletter or on our website at http://www.lyttonparkro.ca/ . If you are a Member you will automatically get LPRO’s Newsletters. Thank you for your support! Have a Happy Family Day! LPRO E-Newsletter – 15 February 2021 1 Settlement Achieved - 2908 Yonge Development at Chatsworth A lot has happened in a very short space of time, including a settlement which approves the zoning for a building at 2908 Yonge (the former Petrocan site at Chatsworth and Yonge).
    [Show full text]