Exploring the Transcriptomics of Polyphagy in Plant-Eating Insects By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring the Transcriptomics of Polyphagy in Plant-Eating Insects By Exploring the transcriptomics of polyphagy in plant-eating insects by Nicholas Christodoulides A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Auburn, Alabama August 5, 2017 Keywords: gene expression, plasticity, host use, generalist Copyright 2017 by Nicholas Christodoulides Approved by Nate B. Hardy, Chair, Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Tonia S. Schwartz, Assistant Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Alana L. Jacobson, Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology Abstract The aim of my thesis research was to gain a better understanding of the genetics underlying insect polyphagy. My thesis consisted of three objectives, each exploring a different aspect of plant-feeding insect genetics. For my first objective, I assembled and analyzed transcriptome data to study how gene expression varies across hosts of an extremely generalist insect, the lobate lac scale (Paratachardina pseudolobata). For my second objective, I examined published transcriptomes of 42 species of plant-feeding insects to test the simple idea that more generalist insects have more biochemical tools for herbivory, and express more herbivory genes. As a final part of my thesis research, I lay the foundation for an experiment to examine the role of phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of host use in aphid species. ii Table of Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................ii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................v List of Figures ................................................................................................................................vi Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Overview …………………………………………………………………………….........1 Theoretical Background……………………………….......................................................2 Host Plant Defenses against Herbivores…………………………………………..2 Detoxification Genes………………………………………………………….......3 Genomics of Generalism…………………………………………………………..4 Thesis Research Design…………………………………………………………………...7 References………………………………………………………………………………..10 Chapter 2: Gene expression plasticity across hosts of an invasive scale insect species…………14 Abstract..............................................................................................................................15 Introduction .......................................................................................................................16 Materials and Methods.......................................................................................................19 Results……………………………………………………………………………………22 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………..26 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….30 References………………………………………………………………………………..32 Chapter 3: Genetic architecture of evolvability: Generalist insect herbivores have more detoxification genes………….......................................................................................................39 Abstract………………………..........................................................................................39 Background........................................................................................................................40 Methods .............................................................................................................................41 iii Results……………………………………………………………………………………43 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………......44 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….45 References………………………………………………………………………………..46 Chapter 4: Experimental Evolution of Host-Use Plasticity in Two Aphid Species……………..54 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..54 Background………………………………………………………………………………55 Proposed Methods………………………………………………………………………..60 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………….....63 References………………………………………………………………………………..64 iv List of Tables Table 2.1 ………………………………………………………………………………………...19 Table 2.2 ……………………………………………………………………………………...…23 Table 2.3 ………………………………………………………………………………………...25 Table 3.1 ………………………………………………………………………………………...49 Table 3.2 ………………………………………………………………………………………...50 v List of Figures Figure 2.1 ………………………………………………………………………………………..24 Figure 3.1 ………………………………………………………………………………………..52 Figure 3.2 ………………………………………………………………………………………..53 Figure 4.1 ………………………………………………………………………………………..62 vi Chapter 1: Introduction Overview Plant-feeding insects comprise about a quarter of the described terrestrial species on earth [1]. The extreme biodiversity of herbivorous insects is commonly attributed to coevolution with their host plants, which they depend on for food, shelter, and mating sites [2]. About 90% of plant- feeding insect species are specialists and only use one type of host plant, or a few similar types. Some species however, are generalists with diets ranging up to hundreds of different plant species [3]. Although generalists play important roles in both human and natural environments, little is known about the genetics underlying generalism and its evolution in insect species. What genetic mechanisms might enable polyphagy in generalist plant-feeding insects? Why are some generalist insects able to consume significantly more hosts than others? Are there heritable gene expression patterns that are associated with generalism? With the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies and the number of available insect gene sequences steadily increasing, we are now in a position to potentially answer these questions and test different hypothesis about the genetic architecture of generalism. My MS thesis was motivated by the need for general knowledge of the genetics of niche generalism. I was interested in 1) obtaining and analyzing plant-eating insect transcriptome data to find specific biological processes and molecular functions that are affected by the host environment, 2) testing the idea that broad diets depend on the proliferation of herbivory genes, and 3) designing an experimental evolution study to assess the role of phenotypic plasticity in host-use adaptation. 1 Through my work on this research, I have gained insights into the genetics of generalist insect herbivory, and have become adept at differential gene expression analysis. I have also learned how to use comparative statistical methods to test hypotheses about host-use adaptation, as well as design experimental evolution studies of generalist gene expression plasticity. Theoretical Background About a third of metazoan species are plant-feeding insects. Most are specialists. Previous studies on specialist insect diversity have linked their high diversification rates with the adoption of phytophagy [4]. Despite being the minority of herbivorous insect species, generalists consume a disproportionate amount of plant material relative to what their species richness would suggest. Generalist insects are also important because they are enriched for pest and invasive species that can damage and transmit plant diseases to hosts that are important to natural ecosystems and human agricultural activities [5]. In addition, they serve as a good model for understanding how broad ecological niches can develop in a group of organisms with typically very narrow ones [6]. We are just beginning to understand the molecular basis of insect-host interactions. Host Plant Defenses against Herbivores In order to understand the broad diets of some plant-eating insect species, we need to know what limits diet breadth. Over their history of antagonism with herbivorous insects, plants have evolved numerous defensive mechanisms to protect themselves from being eaten [7]. Some plant defenses are constitutive, that is, they are always “on” and continuously deter feeding by insects, regardless of whether or not feeding is actually happening. Constitutive defenses may be gross structural barriers, such as bark or waxy cuticles. They may also take the form of secondary plant 2 metabolites such as terpenes, cardenolides, and alkaloids [8]. Because such chemicals may be costly to constantly produce, plant defenses may also be inducible, that is activated only in response to stresses, such as insect feeding. Inducible defense mechanisms are expressed as a part of plant innate immunity, and are triggered in response to foreign proteins and pathogens. In response, some insects are able to secrete effector molecules into their host plants to disable systemic resistance responses such as the synthesis of antimicrobial secondary metabolites. These inducible defenses tend to be more efficient for plants that only occasionally encounter stress [9]. Detoxification Genes In order for plants to be a part of a generalist insects’ host range, the insect must be able to circumvent their defenses, both constitutive and inducible. Early research suggested that plant- feeding insects use detoxification genes as their main tools in circumventing plant defense chemicals [10]. If this is true, then the evolution of detoxification genes could play an important role in the evolution of plant-eating insect niches. Moreover, the same enzymes are thought to be critical for the evolution of resistance to man-made insecticides [11]. Thus, an understanding of the evolutionary genetics of
Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final Report
    Assessment of Forest Pests and Diseases in Protected Areas of Georgia Final report Dr. Iryna Matsiakh Tbilisi 2014 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content, findings, interpretations, and conclusions of this publication are the sole responsibility of the FLEG II (ENPI East) Programme Team (www.enpi-fleg.org) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Implementing Organizations. CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. 3 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Background information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Literature review ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths
    Chapter 8 Molecular Basis of Pheromonogenesis Regulation in Moths J. Joe Hull and Adrien Fónagy Abstract Sexual communication among the vast majority of moths typically involves the synthesis and release of species-specifc, multicomponent blends of sex pheromones (types of insect semiochemicals) by females. These compounds are then interpreted by conspecifc males as olfactory cues regarding female reproduc- tive readiness and assist in pinpointing the spatial location of emitting females. Studies by multiple groups using different model systems have shown that most sex pheromones are synthesized de novo from acetyl-CoA by functionally specialized cells that comprise the pheromone gland. Although signifcant progress was made in identifying pheromone components and elucidating their biosynthetic pathways, it wasn’t until the advent of modern molecular approaches and the increased avail- ability of genetic resources that a more complete understanding of the molecular basis underlying pheromonogenesis was developed. Pheromonogenesis is regulated by a neuropeptide termed Pheromone Biosynthesis Activating Neuropeptide (PBAN) that acts on a G protein-coupled receptor expressed at the surface of phero- mone gland cells. Activation of the PBAN receptor (PBANR) triggers a signal trans- duction cascade that utilizes an infux of extracellular Ca2+ to drive the concerted action of multiple enzymatic steps (i.e. chain-shortening, desaturation, and fatty acyl reduction) that generate the multicomponent pheromone blends specifc to each species. In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of moth sex pheromones before expanding on the molecular mechanisms regulating pheromonogenesis, and con- clude by highlighting recent developments in the literature that disrupt/exploit this critical pathway. J. J. Hull (*) USDA-ARS, US Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA e-mail: [email protected] A.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • Zygènes De Bourgogne-Franche-Comté
    Clé d’identification Les Zygènes de Bourgogne- Franche-Comté Avec la collaboration de Rédacton : Julien Ryelandt, Denis Jugan & Frédéric Mora Mise en page : Justne aMiotte-Suchet Cliché de couverture : Brendan greffier / Autres clichés : Julien Ryelandt Référence bibliographique : ryelandt J., Jugan D. & Mora F., 2019. Clé d’identfcaton des Zygènes de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté. CBNFC-ORI, OPIE FC, SHNA, 13 p. p. 1 5 6 3 1 4 2 LEXIQUE + 2’ INTRODUCTION 5 6 3 ANATOMIE 1 4 a famille des zygènes forme un groupe En Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, ce groupe 2 faunistque à l’identfcaton délicate de taxonomique est composé de 21 espèces à la Lpar les fortes ressemblances entre les distributon inégale du fait de leurs exigences apex des antennes diférentes espèces qui la composent. Il est écologiques. En efet, certaines espèces se antenne bien souvent nécessaire de croiser plusieurs montrent très communes, comme Zygaena fli- critères pour réussir à metre un nom sur un pendulae avec 3 712 données, et d’autres très 5 tache individu, d’autant plus si celui-ci présente rares, comme Jordanita subsolana avec 1 seule collier 5 6 3 6 une forme plus ou moins atypique. En outre, staton récente (BDD TAXA, novembre 2019). 3 5 certaines espèces ne peuvent être séparées Il s’agit globalement d’un ensemble d’espèces 6 1 4 1 43 2 formellement qu’à l’aide de l’examen de leurs présentant de forts intérêts patrimoniaux 4 pièces génitales. Elles resteront donc grou- puisque 12 d’entre-elles sont considérées 2 1 aile antérieure+ 2’2 pées dans le présent document qui se veut comme menacées (EN, VU, CR) et 4 comme + 2’Lavis sous avant tout être un outl d’identfcaton pour quasi-menacées (NT) sur les listes rouges ré- aile postérieure l’aile antérieure l’observateur de terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae)
    ©Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österreichischer Entomologen, Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österr. Entomologen, 42. Jg., 3/4, 1990 Die Widderchen oder Bluts tropfchen Vorarlbergs, Austria occ. (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae) Von Eyjolf AISTLEITNER1, Feldkirch Abstract The Burnets of Vorarlberg, Austria occ. (Lep. Zygaenidae) Chorological and phaenological data on the 16 species of burnets of Vorarlberg are presented. Obser- vations on habitat-choice, endangering, 16 maps of local distribution and phaenograms are given as well. 1. Einleitung Der Verfasser beschäftigte sich vor allem in den 60er und 70er Jahren recht eingehend mit der Zygaenidenfauna ausgewählter geographischer Bereiche. So ist diese Familie für das UG als gut erfaßt anzusehen, allerdings mit der üblichen Einschränkung, daß bestimmte Regionen Vorarlbergs noch immer im faunistischen Sinne unterrepräsentiert sind. Neben den eigenen Daten (AIS, inklusive jener aus der Sammlung BATTISTI, Dornbirn) und jenen aus den Sammlungen C.BRANDSTÄTTER, Bürs (BRA) und Dr. P.HUEMER, Inns- bruck (HUE) wurden die Bestände der Vorarlberger Naturschau, Dornbirn (NSD) mit den Teilsammlungen A.BITSCH (BIT), F.GRADL (GRA), F.RHOMBERG (RHO) und F.SAGE- DER (SAG) revidiert und ausgewertet. Schließlich wurden einige wenige Streudaten aus der Tiergeographischen Datenbank in Linz (ZOODAT) übernommen. Allen genannten Herren und Institutionen gilt es herzlich Dank zu sagen! Für manche fruchtbare Fachdiskussion und Anregung sei den Kollegen Dr.Clas NAUMANN, Bonn, und Dr.Gerhard TARMANN, Innsbruck, ebenso gedankt. Ziel der Arbeit ist es, die Kenntnisse über Chorologie und Phaenologie dieser Familie für das UG zu dokumentieren und einige Beobachtungen zur Habitatwahl und zur Gefähr- dungssituation wiederzugeben. Einige sehr spezielle Fragen und Darstellungen (etwa das transalpina -hippo er epidis-Problem), eingehende Populationsanalysen der Arten insgesamt und eine Iconographie mögen späteren Arbeiten vorbehalten bleiben.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds, Butterflies & Wildflowers of the Dordogne
    Tour Report France – Birds, Butterflies & Wildflowers of the Dordogne 15 – 22 June 2019 Woodchat shrike Lizard orchid Spotted fritillary (female) River Dordogne near Lalinde Compiled by David Simpson & Carine Oosterlee Images courtesy of: Mike Stamp & Corine Oosterlee 01962 302086 [email protected] www.wildlifeworldwide.com Tour Leaders: David Simpson & Corine Oosterlee Day 1: Arrive Bergerac; travel to Mauzac & short local walk Saturday 15 June 2019 It was a rather cool, cloudy and breezy afternoon as the Ryanair flight touched down at Bergerac airport. Before too long the group had passed through security and we were meeting one another outside the arrivals building. There were only five people as two of the group had driven down directly to the hotel in Mauzac, from their home near Limoges in the department of Haute-Vienne immediately north of Dordogne. After a short walk to the minibus we were soon heading off through the fields towards Mauzac on the banks of the River Dordogne. A song thrush sang loudly as we left the airport and some of us had brief views of a corn bunting or two on the airport fence, whilst further on at the Couze bridge over the River Dordogne, several crag martins were flying. En route we also saw our first black kites and an occasional kestrel and buzzard. We were soon parking up at the Hotel Le Barrage where Amanda, the hotel manager, greeted us, gave out room keys and helped us with the suitcases. Here we also met the other couple who had driven straight to the hotel (and who’d already seen a barred grass snake along the riverbank).
    [Show full text]
  • Amphiesmeno- Ptera: the Caddisflies and Lepidoptera
    CY501-C13[548-606].qxd 2/16/05 12:17 AM Page 548 quark11 27B:CY501:Chapters:Chapter-13: 13Amphiesmeno-Amphiesmenoptera: The ptera:Caddisflies The and Lepidoptera With very few exceptions the life histories of the orders Tri- from Old English traveling cadice men, who pinned bits of choptera (caddisflies)Caddisflies and Lepidoptera (moths and butter- cloth to their and coats to advertise their fabrics. A few species flies) are extremely different; the former have aquatic larvae, actually have terrestrial larvae, but even these are relegated to and the latter nearly always have terrestrial, plant-feeding wet leaf litter, so many defining features of the order concern caterpillars. Nonetheless, the close relationship of these two larval adaptations for an almost wholly aquatic lifestyle (Wig- orders hasLepidoptera essentially never been disputed and is supported gins, 1977, 1996). For example, larvae are apneustic (without by strong morphological (Kristensen, 1975, 1991), molecular spiracles) and respire through a thin, permeable cuticle, (Wheeler et al., 2001; Whiting, 2002), and paleontological evi- some of which have filamentous abdominal gills that are sim- dence. Synapomorphies linking these two orders include het- ple or intricately branched (Figure 13.3). Antennae and the erogametic females; a pair of glands on sternite V (found in tentorium of larvae are reduced, though functional signifi- Trichoptera and in basal moths); dense, long setae on the cance of these features is unknown. Larvae do not have pro- wing membrane (which are modified into scales in Lepi- legs on most abdominal segments, save for a pair of anal pro- doptera); forewing with the anal veins looping up to form a legs that have sclerotized hooks for anchoring the larva in its double “Y” configuration; larva with a fused hypopharynx case.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents
    Wimbledon and Putney Commons Monitoring Report Spring/Summer 2015 Contents CONTEXT 1 A. SYSTEMATIC RECORDING 3 METHODS 3 OUTCOMES 6 REFLECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 B. BIOBLITZ 19 REFLECTIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT 21 C. REFERENCES 22 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location of The Plain on Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2 Figure 2 Experimental Reptile Refuge near the Junction of Centre Path and Somerset Ride 5 Figure 3 Contrasting Cut and Uncut Areas in the Conservation Zone of The Plain, Spring 2015 6/7 Figure 4 Notable Plant Species Recorded on The Plain, Summer 2015 8 Figure 5 Meadow Brown and white Admiral Butterflies 14 Figure 6 Hairy Dragonfly and Willow Emerald Damselfly 14 Figure 7 The BioBlitz Route 15 Figure 8 Vestal and European Corn-borer moths 16 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Mowing Dates for the Conservation Area of The Plain 3 Table 2 Dates for General Observational Records of The Plain, 2015 10 Table 3 Birds of The Plain, Spring - Summer 2015 11 Table 4 Summary of Insect Recording in 2015 12/13 Table 5 Rare Beetles Living in the Vicinity of The Plain 15 LIST OF APPENDICES A1 The Wildlife and Conservation Forum and Volunteer Recorders 23 A2 Sward Height Data Spring 2015 24 A3 Floral Records for The Plain : Wimbledon and Putney Commons 2015 26 A4 The Plain Spring and Summer 2015 – John Weir’s General Reports 30 A5 a Birds on The Plain March to September 2015; 41 B Birds on The Plain - summary of frequencies 42 A6 ai Butterflies on The Plain (DW) 43 aii Butterfly long-term transect including The Plain (SR) 44 aiii New woodland butterfly transect
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Minibarcodes in Taxonomic Assignment: a Morphologically
    Zoologica Scripta DNA mini-barcodes in taxonomic assignment: a morphologically unique new homoneurous moth clade from the Indian Himalayas described in Micropterix (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae) DAVID C. LEES,RODOLPHE ROUGERIE,CHRISTOF ZELLER-LUKASHORT &NIELS P. KRISTENSEN Submitted: 3 June 2010 Lees, D. C., Rougerie, R., Zeller-Lukashort, C. & Kristensen, N. P. (2010). DNA mini- Accepted: 24 July 2010 barcodes in taxonomic assignment: a morphologically unique new homoneurous moth doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00447.x clade from the Indian Himalayas described in Micropterix (Lepidoptera, Micropterigidae). — Zoologica Scripta, 39, 642–661. The first micropterigid moths recorded from the Himalayas, Micropterix cornuella sp. n. and Micropterix longicornuella sp. n. (collected, respectively, in 1935 in the Arunachel Pra- desh Province and in 1874 in Darjeeling, both Northeastern India) constitute a new clade, which is unique within the family because of striking specializations of the female postab- domen: tergum VIII ventral plate forming a continuous sclerotized ring, segment IX bear- ing a pair of strongly sclerotized lateroventral plates, each with a prominent horn-like posterior process. Fore wing vein R unforked, all Rs veins preapical; hind wing devoid of a discrete vein R. The combination of the two first-mentioned vein characters suggests close affinity to the large Palearctic genus Micropterix (to some species of which the members of the new clade bear strong superficial resemblance). Whilst absence of the hind wing R is unknown in that genus, this specialization is not incompatible with the new clade being subordinate within it. A 136-bp fragment of Cytochrome oxidase I successfully amplified from both of the 75-year-old specimens strongly supports this generic assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Land Use on Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Abundance and Diversity in the Tropical Coastal Regions of Guyana and Australia
    ResearchOnline@JCU This file is part of the following work: Sambhu, Hemchandranauth (2018) Effects of land use on butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) abundance and diversity in the tropical coastal regions of Guyana and Australia. PhD Thesis, James Cook University. Access to this file is available from: https://doi.org/10.25903/5bd8e93df512e Copyright © 2018 Hemchandranauth Sambhu The author has certified to JCU that they have made a reasonable effort to gain permission and acknowledge the owners of any third party copyright material included in this document. If you believe that this is not the case, please email [email protected] EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON BUTTERFLY (LEPIDOPTERA: NYMPHALIDAE) ABUNDANCE AND DIVERSITY IN THE TROPICAL COASTAL REGIONS OF GUYANA AND AUSTRALIA _____________________________________________ By: Hemchandranauth Sambhu B.Sc. (Biology), University of Guyana, Guyana M.Sc. (Res: Plant and Environmental Sciences), University of Warwick, United Kingdom A thesis Prepared for the College of Science and Engineering, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy James Cook University February, 2018 DEDICATION ________________________________________________________ I dedicate this thesis to my wife, Alliea, and to our little girl who is yet to make her first appearance in this world. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ________________________________________________________ I would like to thank the Australian Government through their Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade for graciously offering me a scholarship (Australia Aid Award – AusAid) to study in Australia. From the time of my departure from my home country in 2014, Alex Salvador, Katherine Elliott and other members of the AusAid team have always ensured that the highest quality of care was extended to me as a foreign student in a distant land.
    [Show full text]
  • K & K Imported Butterflies
    K & K Imported Butterflies www.importedbutterflies.com Ken Werner Owners Kraig Anderson 4075 12 TH AVE NE 12160 Scandia Trail North Naples Fl. 34120 Scandia, MN. 55073 239-353-9492 office 612-961-0292 cell 239-404-0016 cell 651-269-6913 cell 239-353-9492 fax 651-433-2482 fax [email protected] [email protected] Other companies Gulf Coast Butterflies Spineless Wonders Supplier of Consulting and Construction North American Butterflies of unique Butterfly Houses, and special events Exotic Butterfly and Insect list North American Butterfly list This a is a complete list of K & K Imported Butterflies We are also in the process on adding new species, that have never been imported and exhibited in the United States You will need to apply for an interstate transport permit to get the exotic species from any domestic distributor. We will be happy to assist you in any way with filling out the your PPQ526 Thank You Kraig and Ken There is a distinction between import and interstate permits. The two functions/activities can not be on one permit. You are working with an import permit, thus all of the interstate functions are blocked. If you have only a permit to import you will need to apply for an interstate transport permit to get the very same species from a domestic distributor. If you have an import permit (or any other permit), you can go into your ePermits account and go to my applications, copy the application that was originally submitted, thus a Duplicate application is produced. Then go into the "Origination Point" screen, select the "Change Movement Type" button.
    [Show full text]