Deliverable D2.5 Definition of Areas for Improvement
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME [7] Theme Title: Transport (including Aeronautics) SuperGreen SUPPORTING EU’S FREIGHT TRANSPORT LOGISTICS ACTION PLAN ON GREEN CORRIDORS ISSUES Grant agreement for: <Coordination and Support Actions (coordination)> Grant agreement no.: TREN/FP7TR/233573/”SUPERGREEN” Deliverable D2.5 Definition of Areas for Improvement Due date of deliverable: 15 July 2011 Actual submission date: 18 July 2011 (revised: 30 Aug. 2011) Organisation name of lead partner for this deliverable: Sito Oy Document ID number: 02-25-RD-2011-03-01-1 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.5 REVISIONS/DOCUMENT HISTORY: Index Date Authors Reviewers Subject 0 15.7.2011 S. Humberto Internal review Rönkkö, Moyano, Alkis SITO et John Corres al. 1 18.8.2011 As above H. Psaraftis, Revision taking on board NTUA comments from Commission CLASSIFICATION AND APPROVAL Classification: R Public (PU) DEFINITION Nature of the deliverable: R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other Dissemination level: PU = Public PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services). RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services). CO = Confidential; only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services). Confidential for the Duration of the Project: After final project approval by the EC, status for reports classified „Confidential for the Duration of the Project‟ are automatically down-graded to „Public‟. Confidentiality: This document‟s status was converted to „Public‟ after approval by the SuperGreen Consortium and the European Commission. The document can be distributed or used in whole or in part after appropriate acknowledgment of the source. 02-25-RD-2011-03-01-1 2 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.5 Document summary information Authors and contributors Initials Author Organisation Role S.R Sanni Rönkkö SITO Author I.S Ilkka Salanne SITO Author R.V. Raisa Valli SITO Reviewer G.P George Panagakos NTUA Contributor J.S Juha Schweighofer VIA Contributor A.S Andrea Schoen SCH Contributor P.A Paulus T. Aditjandra UNEW Contributor S.F Sara Fozza DAPP Contributor Revision history Rev. Who Date Comment 0 All 15.7.2011 Final report to be sent to Commission 1 S.R 18.8.2011 Response to Commission„s comments 2 Quality Control Name Date Checked by WP leader Ilkka Salanne 29.6.2011 Checked by internal reviewer Humberto Moyano 8.7.2011 Checked by internal reviewer Alkis John Corres 8.7.2011 APPROVAL All partners of the project consortium via a return email have approved the final version of this SuperGreen Deliverable. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Funding for the SuperGreen project has been provided by the European Commission (DG-MOVE) and by partners‟ own funds, in the context of Grant Agreement No. TREN/FP7TR/233573/”SUPERGREEN”. DISCLAIMER Use of any knowledge, information or data contained in this document shall be at the users sole risk. Neither the SuperGreen Consortium nor any of its members, their officers, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible, in negligence or otherwise, for any loss, damage or expense sustained by any person as a result of the use, in any manner or form, of any knowledge, information or data contained in this document, or due to any inaccuracy, omission or error contained herein. The European Commission shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the use of any such knowledge, information or data, or of the consequences thereof. 02-25-RD-2011-03-01-1 3 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.5 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 8 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 9 2 OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE SUPERGREEN PROJECT .................................................................................... 10 2.2 OBJECTIVES OF WORK PACKAGE 2 AND TASK 2.5 .......................................................................... 10 3 METHODOLOGY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 12 4 SUMMARY AND EVALUATIONS OF WORK PACKAGE 2 ....................................................... 14 4.1 TASK 2.1 SELECTION OF CORRIDORS .............................................................................................. 14 4.1.1 Objectives and methodology ...................................................................................................... 14 4.1.2 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.3 Conclusions and evaluation ....................................................................................................... 18 4.2 TASK 2.2 DEFINITION OF BENCHMARK INDICATORS & METHODOLOGY ......................................... 19 4.2.1 Objectives and methodology ...................................................................................................... 19 4.2.2 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.3 Conclusions and evaluation ....................................................................................................... 21 4.3 TASK 2.3 EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN OPERATIONAL & REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ...................... 22 4.3.1 Objectives and methodology ...................................................................................................... 22 4.3.2 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 23 4.4 TASK 2.4 BENCHMARKING OF GREEN CORRIDORS ......................................................................... 26 4.4.1 Objectives and methodology ...................................................................................................... 26 4.4.1 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 28 4.4.2 Conclusions and evaluation ....................................................................................................... 31 5 CORRIDOR SPECIFIC MAJOR BOTTLENECKS AND DEVELOPMENT AREAS ................ 32 5.1 BRENNER ........................................................................................................................................ 32 5.2 FINIS TERRAE ................................................................................................................................. 35 5.3 CLOVERLEAF .................................................................................................................................. 38 5.4 EDELWEISS ..................................................................................................................................... 45 5.5 NUREYEV........................................................................................................................................ 49 5.6 STRAUSS ......................................................................................................................................... 52 5.7 TWO SEAS ....................................................................................................................................... 58 5.8 MARE NOSTRUM............................................................................................................................. 59 5.9 SILK WAY ....................................................................................................................................... 62 6 COMMON DEVELOPMENT AREAS .............................................................................................. 66 6.1 COMMON OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS .............................................................................. 66 6.2 COMMON DEVELOPMENT AREAS RELATED TO POLICIES, LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS ............ 67 6.3 COMMON DEVELOPMENT AREAS RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................... 68 6.4 COMMON DEVELOPMENT AREAS RELATED TO ICT AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY .............. 69 7 BEST PRACTICES .............................................................................................................................. 71 7.1 OPERATIONAL ................................................................................................................................ 71 7.2 POLICIES, LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS .................................................................................... 75 7.3 INFRASTRUCTURE ........................................................................................................................... 79 7.4 ICT AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGY.....................................................................................