DOCSLIB.ORG

Sidereus Nuncius: Mountains and Craters on the Moon Galileo’S Manuscript Drawings of the Moon As Seen with a Telescope: ! ! Cf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sidereus Nuncius: Mountains and Craters on the Moon Galileo’S Manuscript Drawings of the Moon As Seen with a Telescope: ! ! Cf This Friday: Houghton Library Visit, 10-11am ! meet in lobby of Houghton Library at 10am pls travel light (we’ll put our things in a locker) bring a quarter if you can (they have them too) Lecture 10: ! the reception of Copernicus 1543 to 1616 ! -few paid any attention to heliocentrism (“hypothesis” as “model”) ! -a rival theory with the best of both systems (Tycho Brahe and his better data) ! -only a few Copernicans: Kepler, Bruno ! -source of conflict: Tridentine Church + Galileo Copernicus’s De Rev (1543) ! a reworking of Ptolemy’s Almagest that inverts the places of earth and sun ! very technical in Latin ! astronomy the oldest science but not highly ranked in university hierarchy Hierarchy of the disciplines in the medieval and Renaissance university Theology Law Medicine Arts faculty: study philosophy preparatory studies: 7 liberal arts arithmetic, geometry, music, astronomy (quadrivium) grammar, rhetoric, dialectic (trivium) Motions of the earth in the Copernican system ! 1. diurnal rotation (day and night) ! 2. annual orbit of the earth around the sun (seasonal variations) ! + 3. a “trepidation” which accounts for precession of equinoxes (which caused a long slow drift of the equinox from its date) [don’t need to know this] Problems posed by heliocentrism: ! requires a new physics ! requires a near infinite universe + moon looks silly ! requires a new interpretation of some verses in the Bible ! ! ! Erasmus Reinhold,! Prutenic Tables (1551)! using Copernicus’! model and parameters! ! =instrumentalist use! of heliocentrism Tychonic system: ! geo-helio- centrism= ! best of both?? Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), Danish nobleman, received “big science” funding from King of DK, then from Rudolph II in Prague. =science outside univeristies ! Employed assistants (incl Kepler in Prague), had giant metal instruments made to get more precise observations than anyone had ever had (to 2” of arc). ! Here title page of his self-published book about his instruments What is Tycho Brahe’s religion? ! Tycho’s island: Hveen Uraniborg: a house for people and astro instruments Sterneborg: an extra observatory, mostly underground Tycho and his giant quadrant detail: notice the system of graduating the instrument, invented by Tycho other detail: assistants using an armillary sphere and a sextant Tycho Brahe uses his great new data to support his system: ! geoheliocentrism Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) will use Tycho’s data after his death to support heliocentrism Kepler’s guiding conviction: “You [God] ordered all things by measure, number and weight.” (Wisdom 11:21) Mysterium cosmographicum (secret of the universe), 1596: the distances of the planets from the sun are explained by perfect solids nested between the planetary orbs. But he later doubted this scheme. From Kepler’s laborious calculations from Tycho’s data: Mars’ orbit is an ellipse! (K’s 1st law) Also notices that the planet sweeps out equal areas in equal times (2nd law) ! pub’d in Astronomia nova (1609) In Astronomia nova,1609 Kepler concludes empirically that planetary orbits are elliptical Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion:! 1. The orbit of every planet is an ellipse with the sun at one focus.! 2. A line joining a planet and the sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time! 3. The time it takes a planet to orbit around the sun is related to how far away the planet is from the sun. specifically: The squares of the periodic times are to each other as the cubes of the mean distances. Or: The orbital period of a planet squared is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit (the semi-major axis is the longest line crossing the area covered by the ellipse, and includes the 2 foci). ! In 1687 Newton’s Principia explained these laws as effects of the law of gravity. Until then no one understood their significance--but they were evidence that God used math in making the world. Figure 1: Illustration of Kepler's three laws with two planetary orbits. (1) The Harmonices Mundi (1619): harmonies of the world the planetary distances match musical harmonies + finds his 3rd law Frontispiece of the Rudolphine Tables (1627), pub’d by Kepler from Tycho’s data-- the best tables ever (calculated from a Copernican system) detail: Kepler with a few coins showering down on him from above Giordano Bruno 1548-1600 —the ally you don’t need ! Dominican friar, with many heterodox ideas -no Trinity -no transsubstantiation -infinite and eternal worlds (incl copernicanism) etc. denounced in 1592 and executed for heresy Factor leading to conflict #1: ! Counter-Reformation crackdown on heterodoxy ! In doing philosophy Aristotle is safe (Christianized by Thomas Aquinas); everything else is potentially unsafe. ! painting of the Council *Trent of Trent (1545-63) (in Santa Maria Trastevere, Rome) Decrees of the Council of Trent, 1545-63 ! “To control petulant spirits, the Council decrees that in matters of faith and morals pertaining to the edification of Christian doctrine, no one, relying on his own judgment and distorting the sacred scriptures according to his own conceptions shall dare to interpret them contrary to that sense which the holy mother Church to whom it belongs to judge their sense and meanings, has held and does hold, or even contrary to the unanimous agreement of the Church fathers, even though such interpretations should never at any time be published.” (Blackwell, p. 183) Very little Catholic reaction to Copernicus: ! one early objection: Florentine Dominican Giovanni Maria Tolosani in 1544 ms denounces Copernicus as absurd in philosophy and a violation of proper hierarchy of disciplines But also some enthusiasm: ! Diego de Zuñiga, 1536-97 Augustinian, taught at Univ of Salamanca ! In his commentary on Job (1584) Zuñiga argued that the Bible referred to motion of the earth in Job 9:6: “he who moves the earth from its place and its pillars are shaken.” He later rejected heliocentrism as incompatible with Aristotelian philosophy. In 1632 his commentary was put on the index. Factor #2: Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) ! taught math at Pisa then Padua but unhappy at the university ! always in debt (lives with a woman and has 3 children) ! 1611 appointed court mathematician in Florence--his big break! View of Florence from the 16th century members of the Medici family-- Galileo’s patrons in Florence Galileo’s telescopes, Museum of the history of science in Florence ! combination of a convex and a concave lens inside a tube to create magnification ! magnification: X15-20 but small field of vision (15 arc minutes, or about 1/4 of the full moon) Galileo’s telescope =a refracting telescope; Gal’s best magnified up to 30x Title page of Galileo’s Starry Messenger (1610) announcing moons of Jupiter =Medicean stars Sidereus nuncius: mountains and craters on the moon Galileo’s manuscript drawings of the moon as seen with a telescope: ! ! cf. a photograph of the moon Sidereus nuncius: ! with telescope noticing “stars” moving around Jupiter =moons Galileo, Sidereus nuncius (Starry messenger), 1610 reports of moons orbiting around Jupiter which he calls the Medicean stars. Responds to an objection to heliocentrism re earth’s moon the new, pock-marked moon look gets into art of the time! A new piece observation to support Copernicanism: ! phases of Venus, observed by telescope published 1613 Text Heliocentrism predicts a full set of phases of Venus, as for the moon, which became visible with the telescope In the Ptolemaic system (left), Venus always lies between the sun and the earth [because empirically Venus never strays far from the sun positionally] and it would always show a crescent phase. The Copernican system (right) predicts a full range of phases for Venus as it passes from between the sun and the earth to being on the opposite side of the sun from the earth. (from Parvis Ansari http://artsci.shu.edu/physics/1007/historylv.html) Agnolo degli Erri, “Dominican preaching” ca. 1470 Galileo’s enemies: Dominican preachers in Florence; + university philosophers Triggers: ! Vocal enemies: Lodovico delle Colombe (1565-1616) =“pigeonists” ! Tommaso Caccini preaching against motion of the earth ! Unhelpful ally: Paolo Antonio Foscarini (1565-1616), Carmelite, writes in support of heliocentrism Condemnation of 1616 by the Congregation of the Index: ! 1. the sun is the center of the world, and is completely immobile by local motion. Censure: all agreed that this proposition is foolish and absurd in philosophy and is formally heretical, because it explicitly contradicts sentences found in many places in sacred scripture according to the proper meaning of the words and according to the common interpretation and understanding of the Holy Fathers and of learned theologians. ! 2. The earth is not the center of the world and is not immobile, but moves as a whole and also with a diurnal motion. Censure: All agreed that this proposition receives the same censure in philosophy and in respect to theological truth, it is at least erroneous in faith. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Galileo in Rome Galileo in Rome
    Galileo in Rome Galileo in Rome The Rise and Fall of a Troublesome Genius William R. Shea and Mariano Artigas Oxford New York Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi São Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto Copyright © 2003 by Oxford University Press, Inc. First published by Oxford University Press, Inc., 2003 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Issued as an Oxford University Press paperback, 2004 ISBN 0-19-517758-4 (pbk) Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. The Library of Congress has catalogued the cloth edition as follows: Artigas, Mariano. Galileo in Rome : the rise and fall of a troublesome genius / Mariano Artigas and William R. Shea. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-19-516598-5 1. Galilei, Galileo, 1564-1642—Journeys—Italy—Rome. 2. Religion and science—History—16th century. 3. Astronomers—Italy—Biography. I. Shea, William R. II. Title. QB36.G2 A69 2003 520'.92—dc21 2003004247 Book design by planettheo.com 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper CONTENTS ACKNO W L E D G E M E N T S vii I N TRO D U C TIO N ix CHA P TER O N E Job Hunting and the Path
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Author(S): Nicholas Overgaard Source: Prandium - the Journal of Historical Studies, Vol
    Early Modern Catholic Defense of Copernicanism: The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Author(s): Nicholas Overgaard Source: Prandium - The Journal of Historical Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Spring, 2013), pp. 29-36 Published by: The Department of Historical Studies, University of Toronto Mississauga Stable URL: http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/prandium/article/view/19654 Prandium: The Journal of Historical Studies Vol. 2, No. 1, (2013) Early Modern Catholic Defense of Copernicanism: The Jesuits and the Galileo Affair Nicholas Overgaard “Obedience should be blind and prompt,” Ignatius of Loyola reminded his Jesuit brothers a decade after their founding in 1540.1 By the turn of the seventeenth century, the incumbent Superior General Claudio Aquaviva had reiterated Loyola’s expectation of “blind obedience,” with specific regard to Jesuit support for the Catholic Church during the Galileo Affair.2 Interpreting the relationship between the Jesuits and Copernicans like Galileo Galilei through the frame of “blind obedience” reaffirms the conservative image of the Catholic Church – to which the Jesuits owed such obedience – as committed to its medieval traditions. In opposition to this perspective, I will argue that the Jesuits involved in the Galileo Affair3 represent the progressive ideas of the Church in the early seventeenth century. To prove this, I will argue that although the Jesuits rejected the epistemological claims of Copernicanism, they found it beneficial in its practical applications. The desire to solidify their status as the intellectual elites of the Church caused the Jesuits to reject Copernicanism in public. However, they promoted an intellectual environment in which Copernican studies – particularly those of Galileo – could develop with minimal opposition, theological or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Galileo and Bellarmine
    The Inspiration of Astronomical Phenomena VI ASP Conference Series, Vol. 441 Enrico Maria Corsini, ed. c 2011 Astronomical Society of the Pacific Galileo and Bellarmine George V. Coyne, S.J. Vatican Observatory, Vatican City State Abstract. This paper aims to delineate two of the many tensions which bring to light the contrasting views of Galileo Galilei and of Cardinal Robert Bellarmine with respect to the Copernican-Ptolemaic controversies of the 16th and 17th centuries: their respective positions on Aristotle’s natural philosophy and on the interpretation of Sa- cred Scripture. Galileo’s telescopic observations, reported in his Sidereus Nuncius, were bringing about the collapse of Aristotle’s natural philosophy and he taught that there was no science in Scripture. 1. Introduction This paper investigates the tensions between two of the principal protagonists in the controversies involved in the birth of modern science, Galileo Galilei and Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, and how they were resolved or not in a spirit of accommodation. Bellarmine’s fellow Jesuits at the Roman College confirmed Galileo’s Earth-shaking observations, reported in his Sidereus Nuncius. Aristotle’s physics was crumbling. Would Aristotelian philosophy, which was at the service of theology, also collapse? Controversies over the nature of sunspots and of comets seemed to hold implications for the very foundations of Christian belief. Some Churchmen saw the threat and faced it with an astute view into the future; others, though pioneers as scientists, could not face the larger implications of the scientific revolution to which they with Galileo con- tributed. Much of what occurred can be attributed to the strong personalities of the individual antagonists and Bellarmine will prove to be one of the most important of those personages.
    [Show full text]
  • Article De Fond, Réalisation
    ARTICLE DE FOND, RÉA LISATION QUATOR PLANETIS CIRCUM IOVIS : MEDICEA SIDERA Pierre Le Fur (MPSI, Institut Supérieur d'Électronique et du Numérique Toulon, formateur académique en astronomie –Nice) Résumé : Suivons les traces de Galilée en étudiant ses observations sur les quatre satellites médicéens de Jupiter telles qu’elles furent décrites dans le "sidereus nuncius". Nous montrerons qu’à partir de ces relevés on peut retrouver certaines lois ignorées du savant Toscan. Enfin nous proposerons la construction d’un "Jovilab" qualitatif, sorte de tables d’éphémérides de positions de ces quatre satellites. Si, en l’an de grâce 2009, nous souhaitons fêter quasi impossible à déterminer, aurait été dignement l’Année Mondiale de l’Astronomie, immédiate par simple différence entre l’heure la lecture de " sidereus nuncius ", œuvre solaire locale et cette "heure universelle jo- étincelante de Galileo Galilei, s’impose à nous. vienne"; cela aurait constitué une deuxième Elle constitue l’allumette déclenchant l’incendie révolution, moins intellectuelle mais économi- qui embrasa la physique aristotélicienne et ses quement et militairement exceptionnelle. partisans religieux. Les observations récoltées par Galilée pendant Cette œuvre peut être facilement consultée sur les années qui suivirent la publication de le site de l’Université de Strasbourg à "sidereus nuncius " lui permettront d’obtenir un l’adresse [10]. La force et la simplicité de cet outil de prévisions de la position de ces ouvrage apparaît d’emblée, même si l’on ignore satellites : le Jovilab. tout du latin… Les gravures intégrées au texte Je vous propose de suivre les traces de Galilée ; nous suggèrent autant le contenu des d’examiner ses observations médicéennes ; de découvertes décrites par Galilée que le génie de montrer comment on peut retrouver certaines son interprétation.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Data\WP\F\200\Catalogue Sections\Aaapreliminary Pages.Wpd
    Jonathan A. Hill, Bookseller, Inc. 325 West End Avenue, Apt. 10B New York City, New York, 10023-8145 Tel: 646 827-0724 Fax: 212 496-9182 E-mail: [email protected] Catalogue 200 Proofs Science, Medicine, Natural History, Bibliography, & Much More Introduction & Selective Subject Index on Following Pages Introduction TWO HUNDRED CATALOGUES in thirty-three years: more than 35,000 books and manuscripts have been described in these catalogues. Thousands of other books, including many of the most important and unusual, never found their way into my catalogues, having been quickly sold before their descriptions could appear in print. In the last fifteen years, since my Catalogue 100 appeared, many truly exceptional books passed through my hands. Of these, I would like to mention three. The first, sold in 2003 was a copy of the first edition in Latin of the Columbus Letter of 1493. This is now in a private collection. In 2004, I was offered a book which I scarcely dreamed of owning: the Narratio Prima of Rheticus, printed in 1540. Presenting the first announcement of the heliocentric system of Copernicus, this copy in now in the Linda Hall Library in Kansas City, Missouri. Both of the books were sold before they could appear in my catalogues. Finally, the third book is an absolutely miraculous uncut copy in the original limp board wallet binding of Galileo’s Sidereus Nuncius of 1610. Appearing in my Catalogue 178, this copy was acquired by the Library of Congress. This is the first and, probably the last, “personal” catalogue I will prepare.
    [Show full text]
  • Hints Into Kepler's Method
    Stefano Gattei [email protected] Hints into Kepler’s method ABSTRACT The Italian Academy, Columbia University February 4, 2009 Some of Johannes Kepler’s works seem very different in character. His youthful Mysterium cosmographicum (1596) argues for heliocentrism on the basis of metaphysical, astronomical, astrological, numerological, and architectonic principles. By contrast, Astronomia nova (1609) is far more tightly argued on the basis of only a few dynamical principles. In the eyes of many, such a contrast embodies a transition from Renaissance to early modern science. However, Kepler did not subsequently abandon the broader approach of his early works: similar metaphysical arguments reappeared in Harmonices mundi libri V (1619), and he reissued the Mysterium cosmographicum in a second edition in 1621, in which he qualified only some of his youthful arguments. I claim that the conceptual and stylistic features of the Astronomia nova – as well as of other “minor” works, such as Strena seu De nive sexangula (1611) or Nova stereometria doliorum vinariorum (1615) – are intimately related and were purposely chosen because of the response he knew to expect from the astronomical community to the revolutionary changes in astronomy he was proposing. Far from being a stream-of-consciousness or merely rhetorical kind of narrative, as many scholars have argued, Kepler’s expository method was carefully calculated both to convince his readers and to engage them in a critical discussion in the joint effort to know God’s design. By abandoning the perspective of the inductivist philosophy of science, which is forced by its own standards to portray Kepler as a “sleepwalker,” I argue that the key lies in the examination of Kepler’s method: whether considering the functioning and structure of the heavens or the tiny geometry of the little snowflakes, he never hesitated to discuss his own intellectual journey, offering a rational reconstruction of the series of false starts, blind alleys, and failures he encountered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persian-Toledan Astronomical Connection and the European Renaissance
    Academia Europaea 19th Annual Conference in cooperation with: Sociedad Estatal de Conmemoraciones Culturales, Ministerio de Cultura (Spain) “The Dialogue of Three Cultures and our European Heritage” (Toledo Crucible of the Culture and the Dawn of the Renaissance) 2 - 5 September 2007, Toledo, Spain Chair, Organizing Committee: Prof. Manuel G. Velarde The Persian-Toledan Astronomical Connection and the European Renaissance M. Heydari-Malayeri Paris Observatory Summary This paper aims at presenting a brief overview of astronomical exchanges between the Eastern and Western parts of the Islamic world from the 8th to 14th century. These cultural interactions were in fact vaster involving Persian, Indian, Greek, and Chinese traditions. I will particularly focus on some interesting relations between the Persian astronomical heritage and the Andalusian (Spanish) achievements in that period. After a brief introduction dealing mainly with a couple of terminological remarks, I will present a glimpse of the historical context in which Muslim science developed. In Section 3, the origins of Muslim astronomy will be briefly examined. Section 4 will be concerned with Khwârizmi, the Persian astronomer/mathematician who wrote the first major astronomical work in the Muslim world. His influence on later Andalusian astronomy will be looked into in Section 5. Andalusian astronomy flourished in the 11th century, as will be studied in Section 6. Among its major achievements were the Toledan Tables and the Alfonsine Tables, which will be presented in Section 7. The Tables had a major position in European astronomy until the advent of Copernicus in the 16th century. Since Ptolemy’s models were not satisfactory, Muslim astronomers tried to improve them, as we will see in Section 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Borromini and the Cultural Context of Kepler's Harmonices Mundi
    Borromini and the Dr Valerie Shrimplin cultural context of [email protected] Kepler’sHarmonices om Mundi • • • • Francesco Borromini, S Carlo alle Quattro Fontane Rome (dome) Harmonices Mundi, Bk II, p. 64 Facsimile, Carnegie-Mellon University Francesco Borromini, S Ivo alla Sapienza Rome (dome) Harmonices Mundi, Bk IV, p. 137 • Vitruvius • Scriptures – cosmology and The Genesis, Isaiah, Psalms) cosmological • Early Christian - dome of heaven view of the • Byzantine - domed architecture universe and • Renaissance revival – religious art/architecture symbolism of centrally planned churches • Baroque (17th century) non-circular domes as related to Kepler’s views* *INSAP II, Malta 1999 Cosmas Indicopleustes, Universe 6th cent Last Judgment 6th century (VatGr699) Celestial domes Monastery at Daphne (Δάφνη) 11th century S Sophia, Constantinople (built 532-37) ‘hanging architecture’ Galla Placidia, 425 St Mark’s Venice, late 11th century Evidence of Michelangelo interests in Art and Cosmology (Last Judgment); Music/proportion and Mathematics Giacomo Vignola (1507-73) St Andrea in Via Flaminia 1550-1553 Church of San Giacomo in Augusta, in Rome, Italy, completed by Carlo Maderno 1600 [painting is 19th century] Sant'Anna dei Palafrenieri, 1620’s (Borromini with Maderno) Leonardo da Vinci, Notebooks (318r Codex Atlanticus c 1510) Amboise Bachot, 1598 Following p. 52 Astronomia Nova Link between architecture and cosmology (as above) Ovals used as standard ellipse approximation Significant change/increase Revival of neoplatonic terms, geometrical bases in early 17th (ellipse, oval, equilateral triangle) century Fundamental in Harmonices Mundi where orbit of every planet is ellipse with sun at one of foci Borromini combined practical skills with scientific learning and culture • Formative years in Milan (stonemason) • ‘Artistic anarchist’ – innovation and disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology - Malcolm Longair
    ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS - A History of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology - Malcolm Longair A HISTORY OF ASTRONOMY, ASTROPHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Malcolm Longair Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE Keywords: History, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Cosmology, Telescopes, Astronomical Technology, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Ancient Astronomy, Copernican Revolution, Stars and Stellar Evolution, Interstellar Medium, Galaxies, Clusters of Galaxies, Large- scale Structure of the Universe, Active Galaxies, General Relativity, Black Holes, Classical Cosmology, Cosmological Models, Cosmological Evolution, Origin of Galaxies, Very Early Universe Contents 1. Introduction 2. Prehistoric, Ancient and Mediaeval Astronomy up to the Time of Copernicus 3. The Copernican, Galilean and Newtonian Revolutions 4. From Astronomy to Astrophysics – the Development of Astronomical Techniques in the 19th Century 5. The Classification of the Stars – the Harvard Spectral Sequence 6. Stellar Structure and Evolution to 1939 7. The Galaxy and the Nature of the Spiral Nebulae 8. The Origins of Astrophysical Cosmology – Einstein, Friedman, Hubble, Lemaître, Eddington 9. The Opening Up of the Electromagnetic Spectrum and the New Astronomies 10. Stellar Evolution after 1945 11. The Interstellar Medium 12. Galaxies, Clusters Of Galaxies and the Large Scale Structure of the Universe 13. Active Galaxies, General Relativity and Black Holes 14. Classical Cosmology since 1945 15. The Evolution of Galaxies and Active Galaxies with Cosmic Epoch 16. The Origin of Galaxies and the Large-Scale Structure of The Universe 17. The VeryUNESCO Early Universe – EOLSS Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical SketchSAMPLE CHAPTERS Summary This chapter describes the history of the development of astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology from the earliest times to the first decade of the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus and Tycho Brahe
    THE NEWTONIAN REVOLUTION – Part One Philosophy 167: Science Before Newton’s Principia Class 2 16th Century Astronomy: Copernicus and Tycho Brahe September 9, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Copernican Revolution .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Ptolemaic Astronomy: e.g. Longitudes of Mars ................................................................... 1 B. A Problem Raised for Philosophy of Science ....................................................................... 2 C. Background: 13 Centuries of Ptolemaic Astronomy ............................................................. 4 D. 15th Century Planetary Astronomy: Regiomantanus ............................................................. 5 E. Nicolaus Copernicus: A Brief Biography .............................................................................. 6 F. Copernicus and Ibn al-Shāţir (d. 1375) ……………………………………………………. 7 G. The Many Different Copernican Revolutions ........................................................................ 9 H. Some Comments on Kuhn’s View of Science ……………………………………………... 10 II. De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelstium (1543) ..................................................................................... 11 A. From Basic Ptolemaic to Basic Copernican ........................................................................... 11 B. A New Result: Relative Orbital Radii ................................................................................... 12 C. Orbital
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Gresham, Copernican Cosmology, and Planetary
    JHA0010.1177/0021828618790302Journal for the History of AstronomyWłodarczyk et al. 790302research-article2018 Article JHA Journal for the History of Astronomy 2018, Vol. 49(3) 269 –305 Edward Gresham, Copernican © The Author(s) 2018 Article reuse guidelines: Cosmology, and Planetary sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/0021828618790302DOI: 10.1177/0021828618790302 Occultations in Pre-Telescopic journals.sagepub.com/home/jha Astronomy Jarosław Włodarczyk Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland Richard L. Kremer Department of History, Dartmouth College, USA Howard C. Hughes Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, USA Abstract This article introduces an understudied source in the history of astronomy, the Astrostereon or the Discourse of the Falling of the Planet (1603). Written by the English astrologer Edward Gresham, this text presents, among other things, the earliest known set of predicted planetary occultations (for 1603–1604) and the use of these phenomena to defend the Copernican cosmology. We analyse those predictions and then briefly survey all known pre-telescopic observations of reported planetary occulations and the motivations for such observations. These data suggest that for early observers, the greater the difference in apparent brightness between the two occulting bodies, the greater the angular separation could be for an occultation nonetheless to be reported. An appendix seeks to explain this finding by considering several factors known from modern experimental analyses of human visual performance. Keywords Planetary occultations, Edward Gresham, Astrostereon, Copernican cosmology, pre-telescopic observation, human visual performance Corresponding author: Jarosław Włodarczyk, Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 00- 330 Warsaw, Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernicus and His Revolutions
    Copernicus and his Revolutions Produced for the Cosmology and Cultures Project of the OBU Planetarium by Kerry Magruder August, 2005 2 Credits Written & Produced by: Kerry Magruder Narrator: Candace Magruder Copernicus: Kerry Magruder Cardinal Schönberg: Phil Kemp Andreas Osiander: J Harvey C. S. Lewis: Phil Kemp Johann Kepler: J Harvey Book Images courtesy: History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries Photographs and travel slides courtesy: Duane H.D. Roller Archive, History of Science Collections, University of Oklahoma Libraries Digital photography by: Hannah Magruder Soundtrack composed and produced by: Eric Barfield Special thanks to... Peter Barker, Bernie Goldstein, Katherine Tredwell, Dennis Danielson, Mike Keas, JoAnn Palmeri, Hannah Magruder, Rachel Magruder, Susanna Magruder, Candace Magruder Produced with a grant from the American Council of Learned Societies 3 1. Contents 1. Contents________________________________________________3 2. Introduction _____________________________________________4 A. Summary ____________________________________________4 B. Synopsis ____________________________________________5 C. Instructor Notes_______________________________________7 3. Before the Show _________________________________________9 A. Vocabulary and Definitions _____________________________9 B. Pre-Test ____________________________________________10 4. Production Script________________________________________11 A. Production Notes_____________________________________11 B. Theater Preparation___________________________________13
    [Show full text]