DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Virgil C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Virgil C Top crop mark Center image left to right Top crop mark NUREG-0719 Final Environmental Statement related to the operation of Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-395 South Carolina Electric and Gas Company U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation May 1981 F• REGIJ•4 'ao SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This Environmental Statement was prepared by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (hereafter referred to as the staff). 1. The action is administrative. 2. The proposed action is the issuance of an Operating License to the South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (the applicant) for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit I (Summer) located in Fairfield County, South Carolina, 42 km (26 miles) northwest of Columbia, South Carolina, and 1.6 km (I mile) east of the Broad River, near Parr, South Carolina. The South Carolina Public Service Authority owns a one-third interest in this generating unit. The facility employs a pressurized-water reactor (PWR) to produce up to 2775 MWt. A steam turbine-generator will use this heat to provide 900 MW (net) of electric power capacity. The plant site is adjacent to Monticello Reservoir, a 2750-ha (6800-acre) reservoir created by the applicant as part of a pumped storage hydroelectric station. 3. The information in this statement represents the second assessment of the environmental impact associated with the Summer station pursuant to the guidelines of.the National Envi- ronmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's Code of Federal Regulations. After receiving an application for construction of this plant, the staff carried out a review of impacts that would occur during the construction and operation of this plant. This evaluation was issued as a Final Environmental Statement in January 1973. As a result of this environmental review, a safety review, an evaluation by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, and public hearings, the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (now U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission) issued a permit in March 1973 for the construction of the Summer station. As of March 24, 1981, the plant was approximately 98% complete, with a proposed fuel-loading date of August 1981. The applicant has applied for a license to operate the nuclear unit. The required safety and environmental reports to support this application were submitted in December 1976. The staff has reviewed the activities asso- ciated with the proposed operation of this plant; the potential impacts, both beneficial and adverse, are summarized as follows: a. The increased generating capacity will support the increased load demand of the combined systems and will result in increased system and regional reliability. The increased electric energy production at the Summer station will result in production cost savings in 1981 as consumption of coal or oil at existing fossil-fueled units is reduced (Sect. 7). b. Conversion of 1057 ha (2616 acres) of farmland and forestland for the plant and its transmission lines has been necessary. The area impacted is only about 0.1% of the combined forest and agricultural land use in the counties involved (Sects. 4.2 and 8.2.1). c. Plant operation and employment is not expected to create a significant local social impact. The potential exists for increased economic development and associated popu- lation growth resulting from advantageous county tax income paid by South Carolina Electric and Gas Company to Fairfield County. Increased recreational benefits will accrue from a 120-ha (300-acre) subimpoundment and eventually possibly from all of Monticello .Reservoir (Sects. 4.2 and 4.6). d. The impacts on terrestrial biota from plant operation and transmission corridor maintenance clearing will be acceptable. e. The thermal and chemical effluents from the station will comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and are not expected to significantly affect potential future recreational use of Monticello Reservoir or downstream water resources of the Broad River (Sects. 4.3 and 4.4). i f. The adverse impacts on aquatic biota of Monticello Reservoir that will occur from impingement on intake screens, entrainment through the cooling system, and imposi- tion of the thermal effluent on portions of Monticello Reservoir near the discharge canal are not expected to be critical to the biological population of the reservoir. Significant effects of the nuclear station operation are not expected to extend to Parr Reservoir or the downstream rivers (Sect. 4.4.2). g. No measurable radiological impact on man or biota is expected to result from routine operation (Sect. 4.5). The environmental risk from radiation exposure is very low. 4. The following Federal, State, and local agencies were asked to comment on this Environmental Statement: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Department of Agriculture Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers Department of Commerce Department of Energy Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Department of Housing and Urban Development Department of the Interior Department of Transportation Environmental Protection Agency South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control South Carolina Water Resource Commission South Carolina Public Service Commission South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department Fairfield County Administrator, Winnsboro, South Carolina 5. This Final Environmental Statement was made available to the public, to the Environmental Protection Agency, and to other specified agencies in May 1981. The following organizations submitted comments on the Draft Environmental Statement, which was published in June 1979: Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers Department of the Interior Environmental Protection Agency South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control South Carolina Electric and Gas Company The following organizations submitted comments on the supplement to the Draft Environmental Statement, which was published in November 1980: Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Council on Environmental Quality Department of Commerce Department of the Interior Environmental Protection Agency South Carolina Electric and Gas Company Washington Public Power Supply System 6. On the basis of the analysis and evaluation set forth in this statement and after weighing the environmental, economic, technical, and other benefits against environmental and economic costs, the action called for under NEPA and 10 CFR Part 51 is the issuance of an operating license for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit 1 subject to the following conditions for the protection of the environment: a. License Conditions Before engaging in operational activities that may result in a significant adverse environmental impact that was not evaluated or that is significantly greater than evaluated in this Environmental Statement, the licensee shall provide written notifi- cation of such activities to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, and receive written approval from that office before proceeding with such activities. ii b. Significant Environmental Technical Specification Requirements (1) The applicant will carry out the environmental (meteorological, radiological, and ecological) monitoring programs outlined in this Statement as modified and approved by the staff and implemented in the Environmental Protection Plan and the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications incorporated in the operating license for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1. Monitoring of the aquatic environment will be as specified in the NDPES permit issued by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC). (2) The applicant shall notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, of all cases in which the discharge limits included in the NPDES permit, are exceeded or if an application has been submitted to the permitting authority. requesting revision of the limits. (3) If, during the operating life of the plant, environmental effects or evidence of irreversible environmental damage are detected, the applicant shall provide the staff with an analysis of the problem and a proposed course of action to alleviate the problem. iii CONTENTS Page SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . FOREWORD ............................. ........................................ xv I. INTRODUCTION ......................... ................................. 1-1 1.1 HISTORY ..................... .................................... .. 1-1 1.2 PERMITS AND LICENSES .................. ........... ................... 1-1 2. THE SITE ..................... ....................................... .. 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........... ................. ......................... 2-1 2.2 REGIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND LAND USE ........... ........................ .. 2-1 2.2.1 Population changes .............. ........................... .. 2-1 2.2.2 Changes in land use ................. ........................... 2-4 2.2.3 Changes in the local economy .............. ...................... 2-7 2.3 WATER RESOURCES ................... ................................ .. 2-10 2.3.1 Hydrologic engineering description ......... ................ 2-10 2.3.2 Water use ................. ................................ .. 2-13 2.4 METEOROLOGY ..................................... 2-14 2.4.1 Regional climatology ................. .......................... 2-14 2.4.2 Local meteorology. .............. ..........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1977 - June 30~ 1978
    L ~ 1'*5 $.(!#.3 /'111' l#p·;l S.C. STATE LIBRARY OCT 1 21978 CHECKLIST STATE DOCUMENTS OF SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PUBLICATIONS JULY 1~ 1977 - JUNE 30~ 1978 CoMPILED BY SouTH CAROLINA STATE LIBRARY COLUMBIA~ SOUTH CAROLINA SEPTEMBER 1978 CHECKLIST OF SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PUBLICATIONS Published by the South Carolina State Library Dr. Carlanna Hendrick, Chairwoman South Carolina State Library Board Estellene P. Walker, Librarian South Carolina State Library South Carolina State Library 1500 Senate Street P.O. Box 11469 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 PREFACE Checklist of South Carolina State Publications was issued by the Department of Archives and History for fiscal years 1950/51 through 1966/67 and has been issued by the South Carolina State Library* since fiscal year 1969/70. It is an annual listing of those State publications received by the South Carolina State Library. Materials are listed according to the classification system devised for South Carolina State publications, which is in general an alphabetical arrange­ ment by key word in the issuing agency and in the publication title. The index, first issued with the 1974/75 Checklist, is arranged alphabet­ ically by author, title and subject. Corporate authors are excluded if the publication is classified under that author. Most items are available on interlibrary loan from the South Carolina State Library. Individual items desired for permanent retention, except those from the General Assembly, should be requested from the issuing agency. Committee reports of the General Assembly should be requested from the Clerk of the House of Representatives. Other General Assembly publications may be purchased from the following: Code of Laws of 1976 Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company Aqueduct Building, Rochester, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2006-2008 South Carolina
    FORMULA GRANT FUNDING PLAN FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2006-2008 South Carolina Department of Public Safety Office of Justice Programs March 2007 2-1 Three-Year Plan 1.) Updated Description of the System A. Structure and Function of the Juvenile Justice System South Carolina has a largely centralized juvenile justice system, separate and apart from the adult system, and the state bears over 90 percent of the costs of juvenile justice. Although juvenile law enforcement duties are dispersed among the many law enforcement agencies, judicial services are provided by family court judges operating under the South Carolina Unified (Statewide) Family Court Judicial System. Additionally, juvenile justice services are provided by a single state agency, the South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), formerly the Department of Youth Services. DJJ provides a full range of services including: prevention programs, detention/release screening, intake services, probation and aftercare supervision, services to the victims of juvenile crime, restitution programs, institutional programs, community supportive functions, institutional treatment, educational programs, and Interstate Compact administration. The goal of this broad spectrum of services is promoting public safety, preventing delinquency, and rehabilitating juvenile offenders. Major components of the juvenile justice system are described in order of contact with a juvenile as follows: (a) Law Enforcement: The primary functions of law enforcement are apprehension, detention, and referral to the judicial system for further action. Within the scope of their prescribed functions, law enforcement officers and agencies have discretionary powers and the latitude to exercise their best judgment on the proper disposition of cases before them. The discretionary powers relate to choices concerning apprehension, pressing charges, and detention.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist South Carolina State Publications July 1
    Lt./1,5 '3.CI/.1,, ,, IAJ'·2. S. C. STATE U~P~'~ f f,! 0 \/ 2 0 19 79 CHECKLIST OF ·' ' ' SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PUBLICATIONS JULY 1) 1978 - JUNE 30) 1979 COMPILED BY SOUTH CAROLINA STATE LIBRARY COLUMBIA) SOUTH CAROLINA SEPTEMBER 1979 CHECKLIST OF SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PUBLICATIONS Published by the South Carolina State Library Dr. Carlanna Hendrick, Chairman South Carolina State Library Board Betty E. Callaham, Librarian South Carolina State Library South Carolina State Library 1500 Senate Street P .0. Box 11469 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 PREFACE Checklist of South Carolina State Publications was issued by the Department of Archives and History for fiscal years 1950/51 through 1966/67 and has been issued by the South Carolina State Library* since fiscal year 1969/70. It is an annual listing of those State publications received by the South Carolina State Library. Materials are listed according to the classification system devised for South Carolina State publications, which is in general an alphabetical arrange­ ment by key word in the issuing agency and in the publication title. The index, first issued with the 1974/75 Checklist, is arranged alphabet­ ically by author, title and subject. Corporate authors are excluded if the publication is classified under that author. Most items are available on interlibrary loan from the South Carolina State Library. Individual items desired for permanent retention, except those from the General Asse-mbly, should be requested from the issuing agency. Conunittee reports of the General Assembly should be requested from the Clerk of the House of Representatives. Other General Assembly publications may be purchased from the following: Code of Laws of 1976 Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company Aqueduct Building, Rochester, N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • ~ ~ C E RESEARCH' and STATISTICS A~Ssocfatfon
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. T r L. "d '%~. IN I i O i I B L i995 D.~LECTORY VOLU~ ,~~CE RESEARCH' AND STATISTICS A~SSOCfATfON CRIMINAL JUSTICE ISSUES IN THE STATES 1995 DIRECTORY Volume Xll September 1995 NCJRS Prepared by Karen F. Maline Craig A. Cussimanio Emily R. Winkelstein Published by - : _j Justice Research and Statistics Association with support from the Bureau of Justice Statistics National Criminal Justice Refefeam P.O. Box 6000 Rockville, ,~D 20850 JRSA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1994-1995 President Henry Brownstein, Ph.D. William M. Holmes, Ph.D Chief, Bureau of Statistical Services Director New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services Statistical Analysis Center Massachusetts Committee on Criminal Justice Appointed Delegate Richard P. Kern, Ph.D. Vice-President Director Daniel Storkamp Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission Director Minnesota Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Center Staff Secretary~Treasurer Joan C. Weiss, Executive Director Robert R. Friedmann, Ph.D. James Zepp, Director, JRSA National Computer Director Center Statistical Analysis Bureau Sandra Dayton, Director of Finance Department of Criminal Justice Karen F. Maline, Assistant Director for Information Georgia State University Services Kellie J. Dressier, Assistant Director for Special Delegates Projects Timothy Bynum, Ph.D. Craig A. Cussimanio, Information Specialist Director Andrea Richards, Program Associate Michigan Justice Statistics Center Tara O'Connor, Program Assistant School of Criminal Justice Charleen M. Cook, Conference Manager Michigan State University Jennifer Chou, Computer Network Manager Ali Burnett, Office Manager Roger Przybylski Wanda A. Meredith, Executive Secretary Director of Research Maggie Liu, Intern Statistical Analysis Center Emily Winkelstein, Intern Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority This project was supported by Grant Number 94-BJ-CX-K019(S-1 ), awarded by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Discipline Or Crime: an Analysis of the Use of Memoranda of Understanding to Regulate School Resource Officer Intervention in South Carolina Schools
    Student Note Discipline or Crime: An Analysis of the Use of Memoranda of Understanding to Regulate School Resource Officer Intervention in South Carolina Schools. By: Jill Lesley* ABSTRACT School Resource Officers (SROs) have become an integral part of the education environment and are the product of a societal and policy- minded push of law enforcement in schools. As a result of both federal and state legislation, the number of SROs has increased dramatically and has led to an interest in several topics including juvenile justice, criminal law, and police reform. Academics, legal scholars, and policy makers have nearly all agreed that school discipline and law enforcement are distinct concepts, and law enforcement should not be involved in the administration of school discipline. However, these concepts often overlap. This overlap has evoked a need for tools to help delineate the roles of law enforcement and school administrators regarding the school environment and student conduct. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been identified by research as a key tool in laying out the roles and responsibilities of school administrators and SROs and has been introduced by legislation in a number of states. MOUs from seven school districts in South Carolina were analyzed by this paper for their compliance to state educational regulations and effectiveness in achieving clarity with the SRO-school district relationship. After analysis, all seven districts reviewed were found to be out of compliance due to authorization of SROs to intervene in conduct they were prohibited from intervening in by the State. Key issues identified with the MOUs and educational regulations include: use of pro forma language, broad and vague definitions of student criminal behavior, and little definition of school administrator roles _____________________________ * Candidate for Juris Doctor, University of South Carolina School of Law, Class of 2022.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Studies on Tourism and Identity in Modern South Carolina
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: SOMBREROS AND MOTORCYCLES: PLACE STUDIES ON TOURISM AND IDENTITY IN MODERN SOUTH CAROLINA Paula Nicole King, Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Directed By: Professor Mary Corbin Sies, Department of American Studies This dissertation examines the rise of tourism as an important social and economic force in the U.S. South through place studies of tourist sites in South Carolina. The roadside attraction South of the Border and the historically black town of Atlantic Beach are analyzed as touriscapes that provide historical narratives foregrounding the connections between place and southern identity in the modern era. Touriscapes are defined as places where perspectives overlap and identities intersect to produce spaces of serious cultural and historical significance as well as recreation and fun. Both of these touriscapes were enacted as tourism developed and Jim Crow segregation began to crumble, and they have survived into the twenty-first century. They are sites of commercial development, resistance, and political strife that should be studied, engaged, and preserved for future generations to better understand the complexity of southern history, culture, and identity. SOMBREROS AND MOTORCYCLES: PLACE STUDIES ON TOURISM AND IDENTITY IN MODERN SOUTH CAROLINA By Paula Nicole King Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2008 Advisory Committee: Professor Mary Corbin Sies, Chair Professor Angel David Nieves Professor Leslie Rowland Professor Nancy Struna Professor Psyche Williams-Forson © Copyright by Paula Nicole King 2008 Dedication To my father, Paul Michael King ii Acknowledgments I want to thank Professor Mary Corbin Sies for helping the intellectual focus of this work develop and for the rigor with which she read it and the time she took to discuss it with me.
    [Show full text]
  • V SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT of CORRECTIONS
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. --" v SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ANNUAI~ REPORT 1990-1991 Printed Under The Direction Of The State Budget And Control Board • '1 , --- - IWn EX 1986 EX 1921 Chanu ADMISSIONS 7,397 11,433· 54.6% Average Age 29 29 None Non-Whites 57% 65% 8% Females 8% 9% I'll Youthful OtTender Act 860 1,488 73.0% Sentence Length 4 yrs. 10 mos. 4yrs.8mos. -2mos Life Sentences 98 95 -3 RELEASES 6,369 10,021· 57.3% Inmates Paroled 1,616 2,105 30.0% Parolees us % of Releases 25% 21% ·4% Average Time Served t yr. to mos. t yr. 10 mos. None Average: Custody Population 9,299 15,810 70.0% Jurisdiction Population 10,755 17,641 64.0% Time to Serve 4 yrs.l mth. 3 yrs. 11 mas. - 2 mos. Most Serious Offenses (Total Inmate Population): Dangerous Drugs 8.9% 20.6% 11.7% Burglary 11.0% 14.5% 3.5% Larceny 17.0% 10.4% -6.6% Homicide 13.3% 10.2% -3.1% Robbery 13./) % 9.4% -3.6% Assault 7.6% 6.6% .1.0% Sexual Assault 6.8% 6.5% -0.3% *Included In this figure are 83 Shock Probation admissions, 309 Restitution Center admissions, 386 Shock Probation releases, and 298 Restitution Center releases. seDe Division or Resource & Information Management Lorraine T. Fowler, Ph.D., Director· Rev. Nov. '91 Soutb Carolina's Crime Rate Last Six Years Has Ranked 29th or Higher Nationally 1990 Crime Rate (per lO,OOO persons): 604 crimes 1990 National Ranldng: 13th 1990 Violent Crime Rate (per 100,000 persons): 977 Soutb Carolina's Incarceration Rate Last Six Years Has Ranked lst or 2nd Nationally 1990 Incarceration Rate (per 100,000 persons): 451 1990 National Ranking: lst Overall SCDC Recidivism Rate: 32 percent \ People in Soutb Carolina July 1, 1989, Provisional Population Estimate: 3,519,000 Estimated Growth Between 1980 and 1989: 12.8% Projected Growth Between 1980 and 1991: 13.5% 1987 Population at Risk (males 17 to 39): 681,700 1991 Projected Population at Risk (males 17 to 39): 703,300 Comparative Qperatjm~ Costs Per In-State Student Cost at USC for 1991·92: $5,920 Per Capita Income in S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of the Adjutant General
    OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL Nikki Haley, Governor Robert E. Livingston Jr., The Adjutant General TABLE OF CONTENTS TRANSMITTAL FORM 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 ORGANIZATIONAL PROFILE 17 LEADERSHIP 23 STRATEGIC PLANNING 25 CUSTOMER FOCUS AND SATISFACTION 28 MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND KNOWLEDGE 31 HUMAN RESOURCES FOCUS 33 PROCESS MANAGEMENT 36 KEY BUSINESS RESULTS 39 Office of The Adjutant General 39 SC Emergency Management Division 54 SCEMD – Plans, Training and Operations – Part One 60 SCEMD – Plans, Training and Operations – Part Two 63 SCEMD – Plans, Training and Operations – Part Three 64 SCEMD – Citizen Education and Public Information 65 SCEMD – Managed Ongoing HMGP Disaster Accounts 66 SCEMD – Administer the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program (PDM) 67 South Carolina State Guard 68 Youth ChalleNGe Academy 70 STARBASE Swamp Fox 74 Page 1 TRANSMITTAL FORM Agency Name…...…………………….………………….South Carolina Military Department Date of Submission…………….…………….…...........................................September 17, 2012 Agency Director……………..………………....……Robert E Livingston Jr., Major General SCARNG, The Adjutant General Agency Contact Person……………...……………………………..……….Mr. Danny Stewart Agency Contact’s Telephone Number….…………………………………………803-299-4445 OOOffffffiiiccceee ooofff TTThhheee AAAdddjjjuuutttaaannnttt GGGeeennneeerrraaalll SSSooouuuttthhh CCCaaarrrooollliiinnnaaa MMMiiillliiitttaaarrryyy DDDeeepppaaarrrtttmmmeeennnttt 1 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The South Carolina Military Department’s (SCMD) commitment to quality management lends itself to empowerment, innovation and entrepreneurship. It has promoted partnering with other State and Federal agencies and the private sector for mutual advantage. As this agency benchmarks against others for best practices, others benchmark against this agency. This report is “a work in progress” providing a basis for future agency improvements that affect efficiency, productivity, accountability and customer satisfaction. Mission Statement Provide combat-ready units to the US Army and US Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist I J ~
    Lt;ts e e 3' c L/3 /183/J"u/.- s¥.J.. I 'It:!// ~ne- •, :'\' o~ '7. 'tC8~ CHECKLIST I J ~ . .... -. .. of south carolina state Publications July- september 1983 84-1 to 84-184 - v- SDDS S.C STJITI CXXUMENTSDf.POSlTORYSYSTIM CHECKLIST OF SOUTH CAROLINA STATE PUBLICATIONS Published by the South Carolina State Library Dr. Carlanna Hendrick, Chairman South Carolina State Library Board Betty E. Callaham, Librarian South Carolina State Library South Carolina State Library 1500 Senate Street P.O. Box 11469 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 PREFACE The Checklist of South Carolina State Publications was issued annually by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History for fiscal years 1950/51 through 1966/67 and by the South Carolina State Library for fiscal years 1969/70 through 1981/82. Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal year 1982/83, the Checklist is being issued quarterly. Each quarterly issue will have a cumula­ tive index; the listing of publications will not cumulate. Publications listed are those received under authority of the State Documents Depository Act, Act 348 of 1982. Materials are listed according to the classification system devised for South Carolina State publications, which is in general an alphabetical arrange­ ment by key word in the issuing agency and in the publication title. The index, first issued with the 1974/75 Checklist, is arranged alphabet­ ically by author, title and subject. Corporate-8uthors are excluded if the publication is classified under that author. OCLC numbers have been included since the 1981/82 Checklist. Periodicals and uncataloged ephemera are in the 4th quarter Checklist only.
    [Show full text]
  • Savannah Rjve0 Plant Area
    ORNL/Sub-81/13829/5 NUS-3852 \ —. /V^ LEXINCTON ri \ ) EDC;KKIEI,D / I / \ SOCIOECONOMIC BASELINE CHARACTERIZATION , COLUMBIv.v/i,i..«IBIA / \ AIKEN /' / ^ / V { y V v.* x OliAMiKlilK*; V. i S / S IV \ < J Y RICHMOND ^ } UAKNWEI.I. X N \ ^ / i HAMHKIM; \ / / \ I v. ^ \ I BURKE v V I FOR THE J AI.LKNDAI.K \ ,\ SAVANNAH RJVE0 PLANT AREA 1981 / SCREVEN \ / \ j IIA.MI'TO.N^ \ / K / \ > ' / ; / X C / \ prepared for prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory NUS Corporation DISTRIBUTION NC !WI.-.RI,T |C; II,,^,^ ORNL/Sub-81/I3829/5 NUS-3852 J) // SOCIOECONOMIC BASELINE CHARACTER»ZATI ON FOR THE SAVANNAH RIVER PLANT AREA Prepared by NUS Corporation Rockvilie, Maryland 20850 Date Published: September 1981 Under Subcontract 62 B-I3829C for OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by Un ion Carbide Corporation for the Department of Energy Contract No. 1^-7405-^9-26 .DISCLAIMER - ,vc»k <i,r«fcV«»It,, Gf U* tM SUIe% '....trw* it* U" '*d »"y '»>»' lurtj-' tw ft' frtWt'fca.t* <C jctu»*cv. (fc^'Mt jy'i'^w 0' *< .r'O'fjVj" COO.K1. V Com* 0'«t0WO. Of MVV1*' tr"*5 HI uV "Vtrtj'O ryjc U"*'3"lv PeVrC* r«fein to *ny n^Cit't f ixsx'-u, c cc t'rlr . v ott-*r»».yi, «Jo« n«nw'i', to" it >!><•« c >•» <" f*vo»mg by S»«t« Co^-r-fct v •"ess*, tr* os^w o* jjwt s»ef«nd n«»» n 00 "01 'Iv Mte o» »«'lect Wov o* Lml#d SutM Godwrmeru at any «jc<*:y t^K.*.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Justice Issues in the States: 1996 Directory Volume XIII
    O0 O0 o (.0 0 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ISSUES IN THE STATES 1996 DIRECTORY Volume XIII November 1996 Compiled by Karen F. Maline Emily R. Winkelstein Kellie J. Dressier Published by m =_---: - = Justice Research and Statistics Association Joan C. Weiss, Executive Director Support for this project was provided by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice JRSA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1995-1996 President Appointed Delegate Roger Przybylski Richard P. Kern, Ph.D. Associate Director Director Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission Vice-President Past President Timothy Bynum, Ph.D. William M. Holmes, Ph.D. Director Department of Criminal Justice Michigan Justice Statistics Center University of Massachusetts, Boston School of Criminal Justice Michigan State University Staff Secretary/Treasurer Joan C. Weiss, Executive Director Roy Holt Stan Orchowsky, Ph.D., Senior Research Associate Director James Zepp, Director, Training and Technical Statistical Analysis Center Assistance Arizona Criminal Justice Commission Sandra E. Dayton, Director of Finance Karen F. Maline, Assistant Director for Information Delegates Services Kim English Kellie J. Dressier, Assistant Director for Special Director of Research Projects Colorado Division of Criminal Justice Charleen M. Cook, Conference Manager Edward Lo Roy, Information Specialist Pablo Martinez, Ph.D. Emily Winkelstein, Information Services Assistant Director, Special Projects All Bumett, Office Manager Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council Wanda A. Meredith, Executive Secretary Carolynne A. Walker, Secretary/Receptionist This Directory was prepared under Grant Number 94-BJ-CX-K019 from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Depart- ment of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Broadus Miller: Homicide, Lynching, and Outlawry In
    THE WORLD OF BROADUS MILLER: HOMICIDE, LYNCHING, AND OUTLAWRY IN EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA by KEVIN WAYNE YOUNG (Under the Direction of John C. Inscoe) ABSTRACT In the summer of 1927, an African American named Broadus Miller was accused of killing a fifteen-year-old white millworker in Morganton, North Carolina. Following a manhunt lasting nearly two weeks, Miller was killed and his body then publicly displayed on the Morganton courthouse lawn. This dissertation uses Broadus Miller’s personal history as a narrative thread to examine the world within which he lived and died. Miller’s story exemplifies much larger patterns and provides a unique lens on race relations and criminal justice in early twentieth-century North and South Carolina. In Miller’s native South Carolina, white supremacy was maintained through lynching, but violence permeated all forms of human interaction and most homicides featured same-race perpetrators and victims. In the early 1920s, Miller spent three years in the South Carolina state penitentiary after killing an African American woman. The court process in his case illustrates the role of race within the South Carolina legal and judicial systems, while examining conditions in the penitentiary during his incarceration demonstrates that rather than serving any rehabilitative function, the penitentiary was a highly lucrative enterprise designed to benefit penal officials. Following Miller’s release from prison, he embarked upon the same journey as thousands of other black South Carolinians in the early 1920s, when the boll weevil ravaged the state’s cotton fields and precipitated a mass out- migration of farm laborers.
    [Show full text]