DOCSLIB.ORG

An Independent Review of Design & Build Procurement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Independent Review of Design & Build Procurement An Independent Review of Design & Build Procurement/ Construction Model for delivery of school buildings (or other similar public buildings) internationally. This report was prepared for the Department of Education and Skills, for the Government of Ireland May 2020 An Independent Review of Design & Build Procurement/ Construction Model for delivery of school buildings (or other similar public buildings) internationally. Prepared by Dr. Alan Hore Technological University Dublin Professor Lonny Simonian California Polytechnic State University Dr. Barry McAuley Technological University Dublin Revision 1 Published May 2020 Department of Education and Skills ©All rights reserved Designed by: Nicholas Cloake Ad. Dip Des DIT Disclaimer No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means without the permission of the publishers or under the terms of any license permitting limited copying issued by the Irish Copyright Licensing Agency. PAGE 2 An Independent Review of Design & Build Procurement/ Construction Model for delivery of school buildings (or other similar public buildings) internationally. TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents About the Authors Page 4 Acknowledgements Page 5 Executive Summary Page 6 Introduction Page 7 Part 1: Australia, State of New South Wales Page 8 Key Findings Page 10 Procurement Processes Undertaken by Public Entities Page 11 Form of D&B Contracts and Key Aspects Page 16 Operation of D&B Contracts Page 17 Certifi cation and Quality Assurance Methods Page 19 Post Occupancy Evaluation Page 22 NSW Ten Point Commitment to the Construction Industry Page 23 Case Study Page 26 Part 2: Norway Page 30 Key Findings Page 32 Procurement Processes Undertaken by Public Entities Page 33 Form of D&B Contracts and Key Aspects Page 37 Operation of D&B Contracts Page 39 Certifi cation and Quality Assurance Methods Page 41 Post Occupancy Evaluation Page 42 Case Study Page 43 Part 3: United Kingdom Page 47 Key Findings Page 49 Procurement Processes Undertaken by Public Entities Page 50 Form of D&B Contracts and Key Aspects Page 54 Operation of D&B Contracts Page 62 Certifi cation and Quality Assurance Methods Page 65 Post Occupancy Evaluation Page 67 Case Study Page 69 Part 4: United States of America, State of California Page 73 Key Findings Page 75 Procurement Processes Undertaken by Public Entities Page 76 Form of D&B Contracts and Key Aspects Page 82 Operation of D&B Contracts Page 84 Certifi cation and Quality Assurance Methods Page 90 Post Occupancy Evaluation Page 92 Case Study Page 94 Conclusions Page 98 References Page 100 PAGE 3 About the authors About the Authors Dr. Alan Hore Dr. Alan Hore is a Chartered Quantity Surveyor and currently the Head of Quantity Surveying in the School of Surveying and Construction Management at Technological University Dublin. Alan was one of the founders of the Construction IT Alliance and completed (CitA) a Ph.D. on the topic of construction informatics in Trinity College Dublin in 2007. He has an extensive portfolio of published work in the discipline area of construction informatics. Alan was the Principal Investigator on the BIM Innovation Capability Programme in Ireland (2015-2017) and sat on the National BIM Council of Ireland during the preparations of the NBC Roadmap for Digital Transition. Alan is a member of a number of editorial boards for international journals and regularly contributes to international journals and conferences. Professor Lonny Simonian Professor Simonian is an instructor in the College of Architecture and Environmental Design at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo, CA, USA. He holds an MSc. in Engineering from the University of California, Berkeley and a BSc. in Electrical Engineering from Cal Poly. Lonny is a licensed Professional Electrical Engineer in the State of California and a Project Management Institute certifi ed Project Management Professional. His Cal Poly courses have included Building Mechanical / Electrical / Plumbing / Fire (MEPF) Systems, Management of the Construction Firm, and Construction Project Management. Prior research includes grants from the Foundation for the National Fire Protection Association [NFPA]), the Foundation for the National Electrical Contractors Association [NECA]), and two National Science Foundation (NSF) / US Department of Energy (DOE) fellowships in preparation of this report. Professor Simonian was a Fulbright scholar in residence at Technological University, Dublin, providing instruction on topics focusing on: MEPF design and construction, BIM and construction prefabrication, and project management. Dr. Barry McAuley Dr. Barry McAuley is a Chartered Construction Project Manager and full-time lecturer in Digital Construction and Engineering within the School of Multidisciplinary Technologies at Technological University Dublin. Prior to his current position, Barry spent a number of years working in the construction and facilities management sector which enabled him to develop his managerial skills through employment in a number of diverse roles. He completed a Ph.D. in 2016, which focused on using Building Information Modelling to demonstrate how early integration of Facilities Management professionals into the design team can result in reducing life cycle costs. On completion of his Ph.D., Barry spent two years working as the primary postdoctoral researcher on the CitA Lead Enterprise Ireland funded BIM Innovation Capability Programme of Ireland. As a result of his research to-date, he has had a signifi cant body of work published through a combination of industry reports, conference proceedings and journal papers. Pictured from left Dr. Alan Hore, Dr. Barry McAuley and Professor Lonny Simonian PAGE 4 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following people for their contributions and support in sourcing literature and case studies presented in this report. Australia, State of New South Wales Mr. Tim Reardon, Secretary, Department of Premier and Cabinet, New South Wales Government. Ms. Nicola Grayson, Chief Executive Offi cer, Consult Australia. Mr. Anthony Barry, Senior Consultant, Aurecon, Vice President of FIDIC, Australia. Mr. Anthony Manning, Chief Executive, Schools Infrastructure, New South wales, Department of Education. Mr Doug Rayment, Director, Offi ce of the Chief Executive, Education School Infrastructure, NSW Government. Mr. Jeremy Kurucz, Education School Infrastructure, NSW Government. Ms. Erin Giuliani, Education School Infrastructure, NSW Government. Ms. Carmen Debsieh, Executive Project Coordinator, Infrastructure Planning, Schools Infrastructure New South Wales. Norway Mr. Dag Runar Båtvik, Director, NORGESHUS AS, Norway. Ms. Rigmor Helene Hansen, Administrerende direktør (CEO), Undervisningsbygg, Norway. Mr. Ragnhild Skålid, Counsellor for Education, Norges delegasjon til EU, Mission of Norway to the EU. Ms. Liv Kari Skudal Hansteen, CEO, RIF -The Norwegian Association of Consulting Engineering Firms. Kjetil Bakken-Engelsen, Leder Team Oslo / Sivilarkitekt MNAL, LINK Arkitrtur Mr. Eilert Haug Flyen, Undervisningsbygg Oslo KF Ms. Tove Lise Nordahl, LINK Arkitektur Ms. Grethe Brox-Nilsen, Group Leader, LINK Arkitektur United Kingdom Mr. Peadar Murphy, Head of Major Capital Programme Delivery, Infrastructure and Capital Development, Education Authority, Northern Ireland. Mr. Paul McGirk, Chief Exec Hub South East, Hub South East Scotland Limited. Mr. David McDonald, Hub Programme Director, Scottish Futures Trust. Mr. Paul Dodd, Head of Infrastructure Technology, Scottish Futures Trust. Mr. Terry Stocks, Faithful+Gould, Director, Head of Public Sector and Education, UK and Europe. Dr. Alexandra Bolton, Executive Director, Centre for Digital Built Britain, Cambridge University. Mr. Seamus Gallagher, Deputy Director of Investment and Infrastructure, Department for Education, Northern Ireland. Mr. Scott Johnston, School Infrastructure Team, Scottish Government. Mr. Dapo Obatusin, Head, Capital Delivery Framework, Capital Programme Support Division, Capital Group, Operations Directorate, Department for Education UK. Ms. Natalie James-Rutledge, Senior Capital Funding Manager – Schools, Infrastructure Unit, The Education Directorate, Education and Public Services Group, Welsh Government. Mr. Rob Cirin, Early Years and Schools Group, Department for Education Infrastructure Analysis Unit, Department for Education UK. Ms. Jane Balderstone, Programme Director, Priority School Building Programme, Department for Education, UK. Mr. Adam Bray, Priority School Building Programme, Department for Education, UK. Ms. Jennifer Singer, Design Team, Technical Standards, Capital Directorate, Operations Group, Department for Education, UK. State of California, USA Mr. Mark Hovatter, LAUSD Executive Director of Facilities. Mr. Aaron Bridgewater, LAUSD Director, Facilities Planning and Development (Asset Management). PAGE 5 Executive Summary Executive Summary The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the current use and practices of Design and Build (D&B) (procurement/construction model for the delivery of school buildings in four countries internationally (which includes the United Kingdom). The authors give a unique insight into the varied approaches taken by these jurisdictions in the use of D&B procurement in the delivery of publically funded school facilities. The authors do not seek to compare the use of D&B procurement in these regions, as it is important to appreciate the interchangeable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Re Particularly Interested in the Live PROGRAM 01· Exhibits)
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM A n n u a f ''Re p a r t A M eAnnua{ Report o{ the AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM ISSN 1039 • ·1141 To the Hon Bob Carr MP fre111i£'r a/1(/ t(illister /('1 rite · lrts Sir. In accordance with the provisions of the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984. and the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983. we have pleasure in submitting this report of the activities of the Australian Museum Trust for the financial year ended 30 June 1996 for presentation to Parliament. On behalf of the Australian Museum Trust. Dr Des Griffin AM Mr Malcolm Long Secrrfm·lf fi/ tfu, .Jmsl fresic/elll oj tlte Jmsl AUS IR AL I AN MUSE UM 6 College Street Sydney 2000 Phone: (02) 9320 6000 Internet: i1ifol @amsg .Austmus.gov.au Open 7 days (except Chnstmas Day) 9.30am to 5pm Admission Charges: Family $12, Child $2, Adults $5, Concession $3, Seniors and TAMS Members Free . contents Statement of Ph1losophy 4 Introduction 6 Highlights 7 Premier's Message 8 President's Message 10 Director's Message 12 PubliC Programs and Marketing 16 Sc1ence m the Museum 22 Commerc1al Act1V1t1es 36 Corporate Serv1ces 40 Fmanc1al Statements 46 Appendices Trust 62 Management Structure 64 Staff 66 Publ1cat1ons 70 Sponsors 83 Index 84 statement of philosophy The future of our natural environment and cultural heritage IS of central concern: we intend to join in public debate and g1ve adv1ce to government, the community and business. where we have special knowledge The Australian Museum is comm1tted to: • Excellence in research and scholarship 1n natural science and human studies for the benefit of current and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Government Action Plan: a Ten Point Commitment
    NSW Government Action Plan A ten point commitment to the construction sector June 2018 A TEN POINT COMMITMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION SECTOR 1 PURPOSE This statement has been developed by the NSW Government’s Construction Leadership Group (CLG) and is endorsed by its member agencies1, all of whom are engaged in the delivery of a large long term pipeline of infrastructure investment on behalf of the NSW Government. The CLG member agencies recognise that This Action Plan covers all Government-procured the NSW Government can only achieve its construction and is designed to: infrastructure objectives in partnership with the » Encourage an increase in the “supply side” private sector, and that this depends on healthy capacity of the sector to meet future demand. ongoing competition between a capable field » Reduce industry’s costs and “down-time” by of construction firms, sub-contractors and the making Government procurement processes industry supply chain – not just now, but for more efficient. years to come. » Develop the skills, capability and capacity of They have therefore jointly committed to a range the construction industry’s workforce. of steps to help improve the capability and » Encourage culture change and greater capacity of the construction sector. diversity in the construction sector and its suppliers. The NSW Government is committed to achieving value for money in construction procurement. » Foster partnership and collaboration between But value for money does not mean obtaining the public and private sectors to drive the lowest price for every project. Rather, it is innovation in the NSW construction sector. about adopting a broader, longer term view about the need to drive quality, innovation and cost effectiveness by fostering a thriving and sustainable construction sector in NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sydneymeets East Londonnorth & South of the Thames
    Western Sydney meets East London North & South of the Thames Steering Committee and delegate bios W: westernsydney.org.au | A: PO Box 3201 North Parramatta NSW 1750 Australia September 2019 | Page 1 Western Sydney meets East London North & South of the Thames Study tour Steering Committee - bios Christopher Brown AM Chairman and Founder, Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue Christopher retired as Pro Chancellor of Western Sydney University after eight years as a Trustee and Director, in mid-2019. He continues to serve on the boards of the Western Sydney University Academy and External Affairs Committee. Having served on dozens of government boards over 30 years, he was a member of the Federal/State commission that chose the Badgerys Creek Airport site and then devised an advocacy campaign to secure Cabinet support. He served on the NSW Transport & Planning Blueprint Panel that first recognised Parramatta as Sydney’s second CBD and advises News Corp’s ‘Go West/Project Sydney’ editorial campaign. Christopher chaired the WestLine Partnership, which secured a light rail connection in the Olympic Corridor, and the Western Sydney Rail Alliance, which secured $5+ billion to build north/south rail connections to Badgerys Creek. He was founding Convenor of the Parramatta Partnership Forum and the Committee for Liverpool, and now manages the Canterbury-Bankstown Forum and Advance Blacktown civic leadership forums. He chairs the South Western Sydney Local Health Advisory Board and served as an adviser to the Western Sydney Parklands. Raised and educated in Parramatta, he was awarded Australian Honours for services to industry and community in 2014. Leanne Bloch-Jorgensen Head of Thought Leadership and Insights, Corporate and Institutional Bank, National Australia Bank Leanne has spent more than 25 years in the banking and finance sector, having held a variety of strategic and transactional roles in both major domestic and boutique investment banks.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft South District Plan
    Draft South District Plan co-creating a greater sydney November 2016 How to be involved This draft District Plan sets You can read the entire Before making a submission, out aspirations and proposals draft District Plan at please read our privacy for Greater Sydney’s South www.greater.sydney and send statement at District, which includes the feedback: www.greater.sydney/privacy local government areas of • via www.greater.sydney For more information Canterbury-Bankstown, visit www.greater.sydney Georges River and Sutherland. • by email: call us on 1800 617 681 It has been developed by the [email protected] Greater Sydney Commission. • by post: or email: Greater Sydney Commission [email protected] This draft District Plan is on Draft South District Plan formal public exhibition until PO Box 257, the end of March 2017, and will Parramatta NSW 2124 be finalised towards the end of 2017 to allow as many people as possible to provide input. This document was updated on 21 December 2016 to address typographical errors and production faults. A detailed list of the errata can be found at www.greater.sydney/content/publications Draft South District Plan Exhibition THIS SEPARATE DOCUMENT DOCUMENT Overview Draft District Maps Background Website Plan Material Dashboard Our vision — Towards our Greater Sydney 2056 Summary The requirements A compilation of Data and Reports How the A draft brochure of the legislative maps and spatial used to inform the draft District Plan is amendment to of the draft framework information used draft District Plan to be monitored update A Plan for District Plan to inform the draft Growing Sydney District Plan You can view these supporting components, as well as Our vision — Towards our Greater Sydney 2056, SOUTH DISTRICT our proposed 40-year vision for Greater Sydney, at www.greater.sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Adding to the Dividend, Ending the Divide #3
    ADDING TO THE DIVIDEND, ENDING THE DIVIDE #3 ISSUES PAPER 14 | JANUARY 2017 CONTENTS OVERVIEW 4 A CITY OF 8M IN 2056: BUSINESS AS USUAL WON’T DO 4 ADDING TO THE SYDNEY DIVIDEND 5 ENDING THE DIVIDE IN A REBALANCED SYDNEY 6 SYDNEY AND THE NEW NATIONAL NARRATIVE ON CITIES 7 PART 1: ADDING TO THE DIVIDEND 8 THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF SYDNEY 8 SYDNEY’S MOMENTUM CONTINUES 11 SYDNEY STANDS OUT – AND HAS COME A LONG WAY SINCE 2012/13 11 PART 2: ENDING THE DIVIDE 12 WESTERN SYDNEY ON THE MOVE…. 12 BUT THE JOBS GAP REMAINS 12 MEASURING SYDNEY’S DIVIDE WITH EFFECTIVE JOB DENSITY 14 GROSS VALUE ADDED 15 LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY 16 INCOME DIVIDE 17 EDUCATION DIVIDE 17 HEALTH DIVIDE 18 KEEP ON KEEPING ON … 19 PART 3: KEY CITY TRENDS 20 COMPACT SYDNEY AND SPRAWLED SYDNEY 20 THE RE-URBANISATION OF THE ECONOMY AND THE RISE OF INNOVATION DISTRICTS 21 PART 4: A DUAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE TWO SYDNEYS 22 OUTCOMES TO ADDRESS THE DIVIDE 23 INNOVATION DISTRICTS 23 A MORE WALKABLE SYDNEY IS AN ECONOMIC STRATEGY 23 A MORE WALKABLE SYDNEY IS A HEALTH STRATEGY 24 MODAL SHIFT TO COUNTERACT SPRAWL AND SPATIAL INEQUITY 26 POOR MOBILITY MEANS POOR SOCIAL MOBILITY 27 EXPAND THE RAIL NETWORK 28 INCREASING EFFECTIVE JOB DENSITY 30 THE ‘30-MINUTE SYDNEY’: FROM MOBILITY TO ACCESSIBILITY 30 TOWN-CENTRE RENEWAL AND THE BENEFITS OF ‘DENSITY DONE WELL’ 32 POLICY INITATIVES TO REDUCE THE DIVIDE 33 THE VERTICAL FISCAL IMBALANCE 33 LEARNING FROM THE US? 33 ENTER THE CITY DEAL 33 CITY DEALS AND CITY SHAPING INFRASTRUCTURE 34 VALUE CAPTURE, USER CHARGES AND FUNDING ‘CITY FOLLOWING’ INFRASTRUCTURE 35 CITY GOVERNANCE 36 CONCLUSION 37 2 COMMITTEE FOR SYDNEY TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX Q STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT Aurecon
    POWERHOUSE PARRAMATTA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX Q STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION REPORT Aurecon Powerhouse Parramatta Consultation Summary Report Infrastructure NSW May 2020 Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Project status ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Project overview .................................................................................................................................... 4 Project benefits ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Consultation ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Pre-EIS Consultation approach ...................................................................................................................... 6 Communication and engagement objectives ........................................................................................ 6 Engagement framework ........................................................................................................................ 6 Stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Local Development Benefits from Staging Global
    OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Papers 2011/01 Local Development Benefits from Staging Global Events: Achieving the Local Development Legacy from OECD 2012 - A Peer Review of the Olympic and Paralympic Legacy for East London https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kgj3lb83kd0-en Local Development Benefits from Staging Global Events: Achieving the Local Development Legacy from 2012 A peer review of the Olympic and Paralympic legacy for East London proposed by the Department of Communities and Local Government, United Kingdom LOCAL DEVELOPMENT BENEFITS FROM STAGING GLOBAL EVENTS: ACHIEVING THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT LEGACY FROM 2012 A PEER REVIEW OF THE OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC LEGACY FOR EAST LONDON PROPOSED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, UNITED KINGDOM 4 About the OECD The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is a unique forum where the governments of 30 market democracies work together to address the economic, social and governance challenges of globalisation as well as to exploit its opportunities. The OECD‟s way of working consists of a highly effective process that begins with data collection and analysis and moves on to collective discussion of policy, then decision-making and implementation. Mutual examination by governments, multilateral surveillance and peer pressure to conform or reform are at the heart of OECD effectiveness. Much of the material collected and analysed at the OECD is published on paper or online; from press releases and regular compilations of data and projections to one-time publications or monographs on particular issues; from economic surveys of each member country to regular reviews of education systems, science and technology policies or environmental performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Statement 2021-22 A4 - 1 Classification of Agencies
    A4. CLASSIFICATION OF AGENCIES The financial activities of all governments are measured using the government finance statistics (GFS) framework.1 All entities controlled by governments are classified into sectors according to the nature of their activities and funding arrangements. For financial reporting and policy framework purposes, NSW Treasury classifies each NSW Government entity under one of three sectors: general government sector public non-financial corporations public financial corporations. Together, these sectors make up the total state sector. This is not a GFS term, but it is used to describe the scope of all government activities representing the total state. The nature of each sector as it relates to NSW Government entities is as follows: General The general government sector represents the scope of the Budget. Agencies in this sector government sector generally operate under the Financial Management Framework and carry out policy, regulatory and service delivery functions. This sector includes agencies such as the Ministry of Health, Department of Education, NSW Police Force, Rental Bond Board and Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal. ‘General government sector’ is defined under GFS as the institutional sector comprising all government units and non-profit institutions controlled by the Government. Public non-financial Agencies in this sector are either commercial or non-commercial. corporations sector Commercial enterprises generally operate under the Commercial Policy Framework, which aims to replicate disciplines and incentives that drive the efficient commercial practices of private sector businesses. They deliver services to a customer base from which they receive their income. They generally pay dividends and tax-equivalent payments to the general government sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Sydney Commission Annual Report 2018-19.Pdf
    Annual Report 2018/19 Greater Sydney Commission Annual Report 2018/19 October 2019 © Crown Copyright 2019 NSW Government ISBN 978-0-6482729-8-4 DISCLAIMER While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of NSW, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance or upon the whole or any part of this document. COPYRIGHT NOTICE In keeping with the NSW Government’s commitment to encourage the availability of information, you are welcome to reproduce the material that appears in Greater Sydney Commission – Annual Report 2018/19 for personal, in-house or non-commercial use without formal permission or charge. All other rights reserved. If you wish to reproduce, alter, store or transmit material appearing in this Greater Sydney Commission – Annual Report 2018/19 for any other purpose, request for formal permission should be directed to the details below. Email: [email protected] Address: Level 5, 10 Valentine Ave, Parramatta NSW 2150 Tel: (02) 8289 6200 or 1800 617 681 Business hours: 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday Cover photograph: Victoria Park – Camperdown, Eastern City District 3 Letter to the Premier The Hon. Gladys Berejiklian MP Premier GPO Box 5341 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Dear Premier, We are pleased to submit for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report for the Greater Sydney Commission for the year ended 30 June 2019. This Report has been prepared in accordance with the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Act 1984 and the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Regulation 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Annual Report of the NSW Treasury
    Financial resilience, stability and impact NEW SOUTH WALES TREASURY CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2020 How to read this report This annual report was prepared in accordance with the NSW Treasury Annual Report Compliance Checklist. The sections About TCorp, Corporate performance and Operations overview include letters from the Chair and Chief Executive, TCorp aims and objectives, management structure, a summary review of operations, management and activities, and highlights for financial year 2020. The Governance section includes our governance framework, risk management and compliance framework, human resources overview, other required disclosures, financial statements and appendices. All dollar amounts quoted are Australian, unless otherwise noted. Electronic copies of current and previous reports are available at www.tcorp.nsw.gov.au. To assist readers in navigating this report, an index is provided on page 164. Copyright © TCorp (New South Wales Treasury Corporation) 2020 Copyright in the material contained in this report is owned or licensed by New South Wales Treasury Corporation. Except where necessary for viewing the report on the TCorp website on your browser, or as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) or other applicable laws, no material in this report may be reproduced, adapted, uploaded to a third party, linked to, framed, broadcast, distributed or transmitted in any form by any process without the specific written consent of TCorp. Feedback We welcome your feedback on our report to help improve future editions – please contact the Head of Marketing on +61 2 9325 9325. Stay up to date Follow us on www.linkedin.com/company/tcorp-nswtreasurycorporation/ Cover photo An iconic ferry, crossing Sydney Harbour on a foggy morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport for NSW Asset Management Framework Page 2 of 54 Transport for NSW
    Transport for NSW: Asset Management Framework (Submitted as the Transport Cluster Strategic Asset and Services Plan) February 2021 (Final v3.0) Transport for NSW Document history and approval Document history Title: Asset Management Framework (submitted as the Transport Strategic Asset and Services Plan) Document Number: A9117267 Author: Andrew Cooper Issue Date Revision description 1.0 May 2020 First version adopted by Executive Committee 2.0 Draft October 2020 Draft version for submission to Treasury 3.0 draft December 2020 Tidy and style conformance. Minor management edit and copy editing done 3.0 Final February 2021 Final version for submission to Treasury Document approval Endorsed by: Name Signature Date Deputy Secretary Safety, Tara McCarthy 10/02/2021 Environment and Regulation Approved by: Name Signature Date Secretary Rodd Staples 12.02.2021 Copyright: Transport for NSW (2021). 231 Elizabeth Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000. Transport for NSW Asset Management Framework Page 2 of 54 Transport for NSW Table of contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................ 5 1.2 Using this document ........................................................................... 6 2. Asset Management Framework ..................................................................... 8 2.1 Customers & Stakeholders ................................................................. 9 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Part B Chapter 10.2 WATER REFORM NEW SOUTH WALES NCP
    NCP second tranche Assessment Water: New South Wales B10.2 WATER REFORM, NEW SOUTH WALES ASSESSMENT, June 1999 Page Table of Contents 278 Table of abbreviations 280 B10.2.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 283 B10.2.2 REFORM COMMITMENT: COST REFORM AND PRICING 287 10.2.2.1 Cost Recovery 287 10.2.2.2 Consumption Based Pricing 294 10.2.2.3 Cross Subsidies 298 10.2.2.4 CSOs 301 10.2.2.5 Rates of Return 301 10.2.2.6 Rural Cost Recovery 302 10.2.2.7 New Rural Schemes 303 10.2.2.8 Devolution of Irrigation Management 304 B10.2.3 REFORM COMMITMENT: INSTITUTIONAL REFORM 305 10.2.3.1 Separation of Functions 305 10.2.3.2 Commercial Focus 310 10.2.3.3 Performance Monitoring and Best Practice 311 B10.2.4 REFORM COMMITMENT: ALLOCATION AND TRADING 313 10.2.4.1 Water Entitlements 313 10.2.4.2 Environmental Allocations 319 10.2.4.3 Water Trading 331 B10.2.5 REFORM COMMITMENT: ENVIRONMENT AND WATER QUALITY 336 10.2.5.1 Integrated Catchment Management 336 10.2.5.2 National Water Quality Management Strategy 340 278 NCP second tranche Assessment Water: New South Wales B10.2.6 REFORM COMMITMENT: PUBLIC CONSULTATION, EDUCATION 343 ATTACHMENTS 345 Attachment 1: Table of cost recovery for NMUs with more than 10 000 connections Attachment 2: Tariff structures for NMUs with more than 10 000 connections Attachment 3: New South Wales allocation and trading implementation program Attachment 4: Unregulated catchments Attachment 5: Groundwater 279 NCP second tranche Assessment Water: New South Wales T a b l e o f Ab b r e v i a t i o n s ARMCANZ Agriculture and Resource Management
    [Show full text]