DOCSLIB.ORG

Triploid Grass Carp Stocking for Aquatic Vegetation Management in Beech Reservoir

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Triploid Grass Carp Stocking for Aquatic Vegetation Management in Beech Reservoir Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Assessment Project Name: Beech Reservoir Grass Carp EA Project Number: 2017-2 TRIPLOID GRASS CARP STOCKING FOR AQUATIC VEGETATION MANAGEMENT IN BEECH RESERVOIR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Henderson County, Tennessee Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee September 2017 To request further information, contact: Doug White NEPA Specialist Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Drive, WT 11D Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499 Phone: 865-632-2252 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Beech Reservoir ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2 Aquatic Vegetation Management ...................................................................................... 2 1.2 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 3 1.4 Necessary Permits ................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Public Outreach ........................................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Description of Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 No Action Alternative ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Proposed Action Alternative .............................................................................................. 7 2.2 Other Alternatives Evaluated, but Dismissed from Further Consideration .............................. 9 2.3 Comparison of Alternatives .................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Identification of Mitigation Measures ...................................................................................... 11 2.5 The Preferred Alternative ....................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 3 - AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................................................................................................................. 13 3.1 Aquatic Ecology ..................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1.1 Physical and Chemical Characteristics ..................................................................... 13 3.1.1.2 Aquatic Animals ........................................................................................................ 14 3.1.1.3 Aquatic Vegetation .................................................................................................... 16 3.1.1 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 17 3.1.1.1 No Action Alternative................................................................................................. 17 3.1.1.2 Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 20 3.2 Surface Water ........................................................................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 22 3.2.2.1 The No Action Alternative ......................................................................................... 22 3.2.2.2 The Proposed Action Alternative .............................................................................. 23 3.3 Terrestrial Ecology - Wildlife .................................................................................................. 23 3.3.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 24 3.3.2.1 No Action Alternative................................................................................................. 24 3.3.2.2 Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 25 3.4 Threatened and Endangered Terrestrial Species .................................................................. 25 3.4.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 25 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 27 3.4.2.1 The No Action Alternative ......................................................................................... 27 3.4.2.2 The Proposed Action Alternative .............................................................................. 27 3.5 Wetlands ................................................................................................................................ 27 3.5.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 27 3.5.1 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 28 3.5.1.1 No Action Alternative................................................................................................. 28 3.5.1.2 Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 28 3.6 Recreation .............................................................................................................................. 30 Final Environmental Assessment i Grass Carp Stocking for Aquatic Vegetation Management in Beech Reservoir 3.6.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 30 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 30 3.6.2.1 No Action Alternative................................................................................................. 30 3.6.2.2 Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 30 3.7 Socioeconomic Conditions and Environmental Justice ......................................................... 31 3.7.1 Affected Environment ...................................................................................................... 31 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences......................................................................................... 31 3.7.2.1 No Action Alternative................................................................................................. 31 3.7.2.2 Proposed Action Alternative ...................................................................................... 31 3.8 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 32 CHAPTER 4 - LIST OF PREPARERS ............................................................................................... 33 CHAPTER 5 - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RECIPIENTS (AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS) ................................................................................................................ 35 5.1 Federal Agencies ................................................................................................................... 35 5.2 State Agencies ....................................................................................................................... 35 5.3 Local Governments and Organizations.................................................................................. 35 CHAPTER 6 - LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................. 37 List of Tables Table 2-1 Comparison of Impacts of the No Action Alternative and the Proposed Action Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 10 Table 3-1 Beech Forebay Water Quality Results 2012 ..................................................................... 13 Table 3-2 Uses for Streams in the Vicinity of the Proposed Beech Reservoir Triploid Grass Carp Stocking for Aquatic Vegetation Management .............................................. 22 Table 3-3 State and Federally Listed Terrestrial Animal Species Reported from Henderson County,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations
    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
    [Show full text]
  • River Basin Agencies Performance Audit Report: Note to the Reader Regarding Report Organization and Agency Overview
    River Basin Agencies September 2019 DRAFT This is a confidential document. It is not to be copied or disseminated to other parties. DEBORAH V. LOVELESS, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Director KANDI B. THOMAS, CPA, CFE, CGFM, CGMA Assistant Director SCARLET Z. SNEED, CPA, CFE, CGFM, CGMA Audit Manager Robert Harness Heather Roe, CPA Drew Sadler, CGFM In-Charge Auditors John Bowman, CFE Taylor Fritts George Goodwin, CPA Greg Spradley Jafar Ware Staff Auditors Amy Brack Editor Amanda Adams Assistant Editor Comptroller of the Treasury, Division of State Audit Cordell Hull Building 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243 (615) 401-7897 Reports are available at comptroller.tn.gov/office-functions/state-audit.html Mission Statement The mission of the Comptroller’s Office is to make government work better. Comptroller Website comptroller.tn.gov September 3, 2019 The Honorable Randy McNally Mr. Tommy Surber, Chairman Speaker of the Senate Carroll County Watershed Authority The Honorable Cameron Sexton Mr. Tom Needham, Board Member Speaker of the House of Representatives Chickasaw Basin Authority The Honorable Kerry Roberts, Chair Mayor Dwain Land, Chairman Senate Committee on Government Operations Sequatchie Valley Planning and Development The Honorable Martin Daniel, Chair Agency House Committee on Government Operations Mayor Ed Mitchell, Chairman and Tellico Reservoir Development Agency Members of the General Assembly Mr. Thomas Peebles, Chairman State Capitol Tennessee Duck River Development Agency Nashville, TN 37243 Mr. Larry Riggsbee, Secretary and West Fork Drakes Creek Dam and Reservoir Mr. Bryan Bunch, Chairman Interstate Authority Beech River Watershed Development Authority Mayor Brent Greer, Chairman Mr. Gregg Ridley, County Mayor West Tennessee River Basin Authority Bledsoe Regional Water Authority Ladies and Gentlemen: We have conducted a performance audit of selected programs and activities of the nine river basin agencies for the period July 1, 2016, through May 28, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Beech River) Watershed (06040001) of the Tennessee River Basin 2005 Watershed Water Quality Management Plan
    TENNESSEE WESTERN VALLEY (BEECH RIVER) WATERSHED (06040001) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN 2005 WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION TENNESSEE WESTERN VALLEY (BEECH RIVER) WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Tennessee Western Valley (Beech River) Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Tennessee Western Valley (Beech River) Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Tennessee Western Valley (Beech River) Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Tennessee Western Valley (Beech River) Watershed Chapter 6. Future Plans Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • TWRA-2016- TN5171--TWRA Commercial Regulations 09-26-16
    'I Page 1 of 12 TENNESSEE FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION PROCLAMATION 16-41 STATEWIDE PROCLAMATION ON THE COMMERCIAL TAKING OF FISH AND TURTLES Pursuant to the authority granted by Title 70, Tennessee Code Annotated, and Sections 70-1- 206, and 70-4-107 thereof, the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission hereby proclaims the following regulations pertaining to the commercial taking of fish and turtles, hereinafter called commercial fishing. Commercial fishing is hereby authorized in accordance with the following provisions, except where expressly forbidden by law. All commercial fishing gear must meet the specifications and be fished in the manner provided for in Sections I, II, Ill, IV, and V of this proclamation. SECTION I. WATERS OPEN TO COMMERCIAL FISHING For purposes of this proclamation, "river" means that body of water confined within the identifiable banks. At high river stage, oxbows, sloughs, and backwaters accessible by boat from the river are open to commercial fishing, but are considered private water and may be fished only with permission of the landowner. RIVERS The following are open year-round to trotlines, hoop nets, fyke nets, pound nets, trap nets, gill nets, trammel nets, slat baskets, cast nets and turtle traps unless otherwise specified. 1. FORKED DEER RIVER - except that portion of the Middle Fork lying within the boundaries of the Chickasaw National Wildlife Refuge. 2. FRENCH BROAD RIVER 3. HARPETH RIVER - fishing authorized only downstream from Highway 49 Bridge, except that trotlines may be fished upstream of the bridge. 4. HATCHIE RIVER- Hoop nets, fyke nets, trap nets, and pound nets with a mesh size of one (1) inch or smaller and/or three (3) inches or larger on the square may be fished only during the months of October, November, December, January, February, March, and April.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Forked Deer River Water Quality Management Plan
    S.F. FORKED DEER RIVER WATERSHED (08010205) OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION August 19, 2002 SOUTH FORK FORKED DEER RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the SFFD River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the SFFD River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the SFFD River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the SFFD River Watershed Chapter 6. Future Plans Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources of Western Tennessee
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 656 GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WESTERN TENNESSEE BY FRANCIS ^. WITH A CHEMICAL FRANCIS G. WELLS and Prepared in cooperation with TENNESSEE DIVISION OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTmG OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1933 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. - Price 60 cents (Paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract._ ______________________________-__--___-___------------- 1 Introduction ______________-_____-_-_____-_------_--_--_---------- 2 Purpose and scope of mvestigation______________________-______- 2' Location of area____________-----____-_-----__--_-_-----_-_--- 3 Previous investigations________________________________________ 3- Acknowledgments. _--_________--_-___-_-__-__-___-_-_-_-_-_--- 3- Geologic and hydrologic maps__________________________________ 4 Geography ____________-_______-__-_-_-__-___---__-----_--_-___-__ 6 Surface features.______________________________________________ 6 Physiographic position__-_____________-_-__________________ 6 Surface forms_.-__-_-_____----____-___-_-__-__-_-_-__-__-_- 7 Residual ridge_-_--__-__--___-_-_-________-____-_____- 7 Tennessee-Mississippi divide____________________________ 7 Hills of erosion________________________________-_____. 7 Alluvial region_-_____-________________________________ 7 Drainage.___________________________________________________ 8 Development.________________________________________________ 8 Agriculture and lumbering.________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Resources on Microfilm: Henderson County, Tennessee
    West Tennessee Heritage Study Center microfilm information sheet — Henderson County (2003 Oct) Historical Resources on Microfilm: Henderson County, Tennessee Revised: 2003 Oct The most current version of this list is accessible as a printable .pdf file through the WTHSC website at: http://wthsc.utm.edu West Tennessee Heritage Study Center Univ. of Tennessee at Martin West Tennessee Heritage Study Center microfilm information sheet — Henderson County (2003 Oct) Henderson County In mid October 1818, Andrew Jackson and Kentucky governor Isaac Shelby successfully strong-armed Chickasaw Indians into ceding lands of the tribe’s cultural region lying east of the Mississippi River. Land south of the Ohio River and north of the Kentucky-Tennessee border became the Jackson Purchase; land south of that line within Tennessee became the Western District. Earlier that year the first settler known to establish themselves within current Henderson County was Joseph Reed’s two sons Jack and William, who located on Beech River, about five miles east of the site that became Lexington, the county seat, about five years later. The Tennessee legislature passed an act to organize the Western District region into new counties November 7, 1821 (Acts of Tennessee 1821, p.39). Seventeen counties were created during the next few years to organize this section politically, three of which straddled the Tennessee River. Henderson County was one of these, chartered barely a week after the initial act and named in honor of Col. James Henderson, who had commanded Tennessee troops at the Battle of New Orleans. Until the independent organization became effective in early 1822, the Henderson County region was under the administration of Stewart County.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Valley Reservoir and Stream Quality - 1993 Summary of Vital Signs and Use Suitability Monitoring
    Tennessee Water Management May 1994 Chattanooga, Tennessee Valley Authority TENNESSEE VALLEY RESERVOIR AND STREAM QUALITY - 1993 SUMMARY OF VITAL SIGNS AND USE SUITABILITY MONITORING VOLUME I CLEAN WATER INIT1 AT IVE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Resource Group Water Management TENNESSEE VALLEY RESERVOIR AND STREAM QUALITY - 1993 SUMMARY OF VITAL SIGNS AND USE SUITABILITY MONITORING Volume I Report Coordinators: Donald L. Dycus and Dennis L. Meinert Authors and Contributors: Steven A. Ahlstedt Allen M. Brown Neil C. Carriker Tammy L. Carroll Donald L. Dycus Joe P. Fehring Gary D. Hickman Dennis L. Meinert Charles F. Saylor Damien J. Simbeck Janis W. Strunk Amy K. Wales David H. Webb Chattanooga, Tennessee May 1994 KEY CONTACTS FOR MONITORING FUNCTIONS Monitoring Ptvgmm Design Neil Carriker (615) 751-7330 Don Dycus (615) 751-7322 Water Quality Monitoring Physical/&mical Reservoirs Dennis Meinert (615) 751-8962 Streams Jan Strunk (615) 751-8637 Bacteriological Joe Fehring (615) 751-7308 Sedin~?nlQuality Physical/&mical Dennis Meinert (615) 751-8962 Toxicity Damien Simbeck (205) 729-4549 Biological Monitoring Fish Ecology Reservoirs Gary Hickman (615) 632-1791 Streams Charlie Saylor (615) 632-1779 Consumption Don Dycus (6 15) 75 1-7322 Benthic Macroinvertebrates Reservoirs Amy Wales (615) 751-7831 Streams Steve Ahlstedt (615) 632-1781 Ecological Health Don Dycus (615) 751-7322 Dennis Meinert (615) 751-8962 ii CONTENTS .VOLUME I TABLES ........................................................ vi FIGURES .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in the Mississippi Embayment in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Illinois by PAUL R
    Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in the Mississippi Embayment in Tennessee, Kentucky, and Illinois By PAUL R. SPEER, W. J. PERRY, JOHN A. McCABE, O. G. LARA, and others With a section on QUALITY OF THE WATER By H. G. JEFFERY WATER RESOURCES OF THE MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 448-H The magnitude^ duration^ frequency of recurrence^ and chemical composition of low flows UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract _______________________ HI Manmade changes Continued Introduction __ __________________________ 1 Farm-pond program ___ ____ __ H9 Purpose and scope_____________________________ 2 Low-flow characteristics-__ __ _ 9 Definition of terms ________________________ 3 Low-flow frequency. ___ 11 Description of the area__________________________ 3 Flow duration ________ __ 12 Climate _____________ _ ________________________ 3 Factors affecting low flow _____ 18 Physiography. ______ ____________________ 3 Ohio River basin except Cumberland and Tennessee Geology _ ____ 5 River basins.__________________ _ _________ 19 Manmade changes.________________________________ 6 Tennessee River basin. _ ____ _______ ___ 19 Ohio River basin except Cumberland and Tennessee Lower Mississippi River basin ______ ________ 20 River basins-____________________________ 7 Cache River basin ___________ 7 Major floods and ground-water recharge.---- ______ 21 Tennessee River basin___________________________ 7 Low flows and ground-water fluctuations.--. 22 Beech River basin______________________ 7 Method of study _______ _ 24 Big Sandy River basin______________________ 7 Basic data for the analysis ____ 24 Lower Mississippi River basin ____________ _ Draft-storage relations._____ __________ __________ 24 Obion River basin__ ___ ______ Quality of the water, by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Forked Deer River Watershed (08010206)
    FORKED DEER RIVER WATERSHED (08010206) OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION 2003 Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes. AFO. Animal Feeding Operation. Ambient Sites. Those sites established for long term instream monitoring of water quality. ARAP. Aquatic Resource Alteration Permit. Assessment. The result of an analysis of how well streams meet the water quality criteria assigned to them. Bankfull Discharge. The momentary maximum peak flow before a stream overflows its banks onto a floodplain. Basin. An area that drains several smaller watersheds to a common point. Most watersheds in Tennessee are part of the Cumberland, Mississippi, or Tennessee Basin (The Conasauga River and Barren River Watersheds are the exceptions).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 0400-40-04, Use Classifications for Surface Waters
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION CHAPTER 0400-40-04 USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR SURFACE WATERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 0400-40-04-.01 Memphis Area Basin 0400-40-04-.08 Upper Tennessee River Basin 0400-40-04-.02 Hatchie River Basin 0400-40-04-.09 Clinch River Basin 0400-40-04-.03 Obion-Forked Deer Basin 0400-40-04-.10 French Broad River Basin 0400-40-04-.04 Tennessee River Basin–Western Valley 0400-40-04-.11 Holston River Basin 0400-40-04-.05 Duck River Basin 0400-40-04-.12 Lower Cumberland River Basin 0400-40-04-.06 Elk River Basin (including Shoal Creek) 0400-40-04-.13 Upper Cumberland River Basin 0400-40-04-.07 Lower Tennessee River Basin 0400-40-04-.14 Barren River Basin (including Conasauga Basin) Abbreviations for Designated Uses and Trout Streams: Domestic Water DOM Supply Industrial Water IWS Supply Fish and Aquatic FAL Life Trout Stream TS Naturally Reproducing Trout Stream NRTS Recreation REC Livestock Watering LWW and Wildlife Irrigation IRR September, 2019 (Revised) 1 USE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR SURFACE WATERS CHAPTER 0400-40-04 (Table of Contents, continued) Navigation NAV 0400-40-04-.01 MEMPHIS AREA BASIN.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Group 142 Tennessee Valley Authority Engineering, Design, and Construction Division
    Record Group 142 Tennessee Valley Authority Engineering, Design, and Construction Division Project Histories and Reports, 1937-1974 National Archives Identifier 890185 This series consists of project histories and periodic reports documenting the planning, design, and construction of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) projects. Photographs, drawings, charts, and maps are filed among the reports. Project histories and reports present detailed and comprehensive accounts of TVA's progress in designing and constructing large engineering projects, such as dams and power-generating plants. Records in this series reference the following TVA projects: Wilson Dam, Norris Dam, Wheeler Dam, Pickwick Landing, Hiwassee Dam, Guntersville Dam, Chickamauga Dam, Gilbertsville Dam, Watts Bar Dam, Fort Loudon Dam, Hales Bar Dam, Cherokee Dam, Appalachia Dam, Chatuge Dam, Nottely Dam, Ocoee Dam, Fontana Dam, South Holston Dam, Watauga Dam, Douglas Dam, Wilbur Dam, Johnsonville Steam Plant, Boone Dam, Fort Patrick Henry Dam, Widows Creek Steam Plant, Godwin Phosphate Plant, Kingston Steam Plant, Shawnee Steam Plant, Colbert Steam Plant, Memphis Area Steam Plant, Jon Sevier Steam Plant, Gallatin Steam Plant, Chilhowee Dam, Colbert Steam Plant, Melton Hill Dam, Steam Plant G, Shannon Creek Project, Knoxville Area Steam Plant, Paradise Steam Plant, Bull Rum Steam Plant, Beech River Project, Raccoon Mountain Pumped Storage Project, Nickajack Dam, Decatur Area Steam Plant, Lost Creek Dam, Piney Creek Dam, Browns Creek Dam, Tellico Dam, Dry Creek Dam, Big Creek Dam,
    [Show full text]