DOCSLIB.ORG

Record Group 142 Tennessee Valley Authority Engineering, Design, and Construction Division

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Record Group 142 Tennessee Valley Authority Engineering, Design, and Construction Division Record Group 142 Tennessee Valley Authority Engineering, Design, and Construction Division Project Histories and Reports, 1937-1974 National Archives Identifier 890185 This series consists of project histories and periodic reports documenting the planning, design, and construction of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) projects. Photographs, drawings, charts, and maps are filed among the reports. Project histories and reports present detailed and comprehensive accounts of TVA's progress in designing and constructing large engineering projects, such as dams and power-generating plants. Records in this series reference the following TVA projects: Wilson Dam, Norris Dam, Wheeler Dam, Pickwick Landing, Hiwassee Dam, Guntersville Dam, Chickamauga Dam, Gilbertsville Dam, Watts Bar Dam, Fort Loudon Dam, Hales Bar Dam, Cherokee Dam, Appalachia Dam, Chatuge Dam, Nottely Dam, Ocoee Dam, Fontana Dam, South Holston Dam, Watauga Dam, Douglas Dam, Wilbur Dam, Johnsonville Steam Plant, Boone Dam, Fort Patrick Henry Dam, Widows Creek Steam Plant, Godwin Phosphate Plant, Kingston Steam Plant, Shawnee Steam Plant, Colbert Steam Plant, Memphis Area Steam Plant, Jon Sevier Steam Plant, Gallatin Steam Plant, Chilhowee Dam, Colbert Steam Plant, Melton Hill Dam, Steam Plant G, Shannon Creek Project, Knoxville Area Steam Plant, Paradise Steam Plant, Bull Rum Steam Plant, Beech River Project, Raccoon Mountain Pumped Storage Project, Nickajack Dam, Decatur Area Steam Plant, Lost Creek Dam, Piney Creek Dam, Browns Creek Dam, Tellico Dam, Dry Creek Dam, Big Creek Dam, Tims Ford Dam, Can Creek Development Project, Clear Creek Project or Bristol Flood Protection Project, Land Between the Lakes Projects, Bear Creek Dam, Oostenaula Creek Dam, U.S. Public Health Service - TVA Composting Plant, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Columbia - Upper Duck River Project, Sugar Creek Dam, Sevierville Flood Protection Project, Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, Coeburn Flood Control Project, Oliver Springs Redevelopment Project, Cumberland Steam Plant, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Buffalo Scenic Spillway, Little Bear Creek Dam, Mills River Dam, Harriman - Rockwood Industrial Corridor, Thomas H. Allen Steam Plant, Shelby Substation and Transmission Line, Johnson City Composting Plant, Bellefonte Nuclear Plant, Briceville Flood Relief Project, Hartsville Nuclear Plant, Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant, Camp Breckenridge, Timberlake New Community, and Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant. This series documents the technical development and growth of electrical power in the Tennessee River Valley Region. Box 1 0 – 12 Engineering Data Division 1935 0 – 13 Progress Reports – Geology 1935 0 – 15 Progress Reports - Engineering Services Division 1934 0 – 18 Highway & Railroad Division Progress Reports 1934 – 1935 0 – 21 Construction Plant Division Monthly Progress Report 1934 0 – 22 Progress Reports Construction & Maintenance Division 1935 0 – 23 Reservoir Clearance Division Monthly Progress Reports 1934 – 1935 0 – 25 Annual Reports June 30, 1934 - 1934 Box 2 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1935 - 1938 Box 3 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1939 - 1942 Box 4 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1943 - 1949 Box 5 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1950 - 1956 Box 6 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1957 - 1962 Box 7 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1963 - 1968 Box 8 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1969 - 1976 part Box 9 0 – 25 Annual Reports 1976 cont. – 1982 Box 10 0-25 Annual Reports 1983 – 1986 0-26-1 Chattanooga Office Progress Reports by Duncan Charlton 0-26-2 Progress Report Field Investigation Section Box 11 0-26-3 Progress Reports Navigation & General Studies 0-26-4 Progress Reports Hydrography & Silt Investigation 0-26-5 Progress Report General Engineering & Geology Division 0-26-6 Progress Reports – Flood Control 0-26-7 Compilation, Research & Forecasting Unit Progress Report 0-26-8 Water Resources Inventory- CWA March 1934 0-26-9 Mapping and Aerial Photography Jan. 1935 0-26-10 Progress Reports – Study of French Broad River 0-26-11 Progress Reports – Engineering Planning Section 0-27 Control of Property & Development Adjacent to TVA Construction Centers 0-28 Investment Control Construction Plant Division 0-31 Justification of Increases in 1938 Budget Estimates- Construction Plant Division 0-32 Cofferdam Unwatering 0-33 Index To Construction Plant Bulletins 0-34 Construction Plant Bulletins Vol. 1 0-34 Construction Plant Bulletins Vol. 2 part Box 12 0-34 Construction Plant Bulletins Vol. 2 cont. 0-34 Construction Plant Bulletins Vol. 3 0-34 Construction Plant Bulletins Vol. 4 (no Vol. 5 found) 0-34 Construction Plant Bulletins Vol. 6 Box 13 0-36 Suggestions For Possible Improvements in Engineering & Construction 0-37 Conveyor Installation 0-39 Vibrator Screen Designs & Application to Concrete Aggregate Preparation Plants 0-40 Modern Trend In Construction Equipment 0-42 Gasoline Locomotive Selection 0-44 Force Account 0-46 Material Concerning the Construction Equipment Policy 0-48 Engineering & Construction Department Construction Equipment Policy 0-50 Construction Plant Operations 0-58 Recent Improvements in Construction Layouts 0-59 Project Placement Chart of Major Construction Equipment 0-61 Field Methods For Pressure Grouting Foundation of Boulder Dam 0-64 Aggregate Reclaiming Tunnel Detailed Cost Analysis 0-67 Construction Plant Bulletins – Mailing List Distribution 0-68 Comparison of Unit Construction Cost 0-70 Equipment Record Samples 0-75 Equipment Policies 0-78 Construction Plant Operations 0-81 Form Work Costs 0-87 Equipment & Plant Depreciation 0-88 Effect of Land Grant Railroad Freight Differential 0-89 Training Financial Statement 0-91 Cost Memo To Federal Power Commission 0-93 Allocation of Costs In Multiple-Use Projects 0-94 Navigation and Flood Control Program 0-95 Construction Costs on TVA Projects 0-96 Study of Design Costs 0-97 Estimating Data Requested by Mr. G. Gale Dixon 0-98 Uniform Methods of Distributing Costs of Job Service Systems 0-99 Meeting of TVA Engineers at Pickwick Landing Dam Sept. 24-25, 1937 0-100 TVA Office Building 0-101 Truckable Unit House 0-102 Water Supply – Wheeler & Pickwick Dams 0-103 Camp Management Functions 0-104 Program of Procedure in Construction Community Design 0-105 Camp Water Supply and Sewerage Facilities 0-106 Dwelling Rentals on TVA Properties 0-107 Flood Protection for the City of Chattanooga, TN 0-109 Effect of Storage At Chickamauga 0-110 Effect of Storage at Norris, Fontana, & Fowler Bend Box 14 0-111 Millions For Flood Control Hundreds For Flood Prevention 0-112 Petition of Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission To TVA 0-113 Budget Circular no. 338 on Flood Control Studies 0-114 Certain Flood Problems In The Tennessee Valley - Report 0-115 Flood Storage Dams Above Paducah 0-116 #1 Flood control by authority dams by Sherman M. Woodward July 1936 0-117 Report of Flood Control Consultants 0-118 Holston River Power Company Projects 0-121 Chattanooga Flood Control by E. L. Chandler Oct. 1936 0-122 Chattanooga Flood Control Survey 0-123 Dr. A. E. Morgan’s Talk Before Chattanooga Flood Protection District Comm. 0-125 Relations of Tennessee Flood Control To Mississippi River Flood Control 0-127 TVA Flood Relief Operations 1937 0-128 Effect of August 1936 Florence Discharges on Mississippi River Low Flows 0-129 Chattanooga Flood Control Survey – notes 0-130 Photographs of the 1937 Flood {SOME SMALL IMAGES } 0-131 TVA Water Control Operations January 1937 Flood 0-132 Letter to A. F. Blaess on Flood Control 0-133 Value of Flood Height Reduction to the Alluvial Valley – Lower Miss. River 0-134-1 Report # 0-134-1 Information For Consultants Feb 3, 1941 0-134-2 Report # 0-134-2 Information For Consultants March 14, 1941 0-134-3 Report # 0-134 –3 Information For Consultants March 14, 1941 part Box 15 0-134-3 Report # 0-134-3 Information For Consultants July 38, 1941 cont. 0-134-4 Report # 0-134-4 Information For Consultants Sept. 15, 1941 0-134-5 Report # 0-134-5 Information For Consultants Jan. 5,1942 0-134-6 Report # 0-134-6 Information For Consultants Feb. 24,1942 0-134-7 Report # 0-134-7 Information For Consultants June 15,1942 0-134-7A Report To Consultants Status of Upper Holston Projects 0-134-8 Report # 0-134-8 Information For Consultants Oct. 5, 1943 0-134-9 Report # 0-134-9 Information For Consultants May 28, 1943 0-134-10 Report # 0-134-10 Information For Consultants July 19, 1942 0-134-11 Report # 0-134-11 Information For Consultants Sept. 14, 1943 0-134-12 Report # 0-134-12 Information For Consultants Dec. 7, 1943 0-134-13 Report # 0-134-13 Information For Consultants July 11, 1944 0-134-14 Report # 0-134-14 Information For Consultants October 2, 1944 0-134-15 Report # 0-134-15 Information For Consultants May 26, 1947 Box 16 0-134-16 Report # 0-134-16 Information For Consultants May 26-28 1947 0-134-17 Report # 0-134-17 Information For Consultants April 25-26, 1949 0-134-18 Report # 0-134-18 Information For Consultants July 24-26, 1950 0-134-19 Report # 0-134-19 Information For Consultants August 11-12, 1952 0-134-20 Report # 0-134-20 Information For Consultants July 22-23, 1954 0-135 Water Level Fluctuation for Mosquito Control 1938 Season 0-136 R Manual For Soil erosion Control Engineering Phase Oct. 13, 1939 0-137 Forester’s Daily Tasks and Varied 0-138 On The Diseases of Plants, Animals & Government Employees 0-140 Plans With Life Preserve 0-141 Fish Ladders in Dams 0-142 Forestry Division Work in The Valley July 1936 0-143 Third World Power Conference & Second Congress on Large Dams Sept. 1936 0-144 Leisure Time In An Industrial Democracy 0-145 Report # 3 Permanent Management of TVA Lands & Waters March 18, 1937 Box 17 0-146 Forest Influence Investigations At The Appalachian Forest Experiment Station 0-147 Passenger-Carrying Boat Service Norris Lake Forest 0-148 Undeveloped Mineral Resources 0-149 Future Mineral Development in TVA Area Dec.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Histories: Boise Project” Vol
    The Boise Project Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation History Program Denver, Colorado Originally printed:1997 Reformatted, reedited, and reprinted by Brit Storey: December 2009 Table of Contents Table of Contents..............................................................1 The Boise Project..............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................4 Boise River Diversion Dam, Deer Flat Embankments, and Main Canal........6 Arrowrock Dam..................................................12 The Payette Division..............................................21 Black Canyon Dam ...............................................22 Deadwood Dam ..................................................27 Anderson Ranch Dam .............................................31 Cascade Dam....................................................38 Post Construction History ................................................40 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................45 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water...................................47 Conclusion............................................................49 About the Author .............................................................49 Bibliography ................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Nine Lakes
    MELTON HILL LAKE NORRIS LAKE - 809 miles of shoreline - 173 miles of shoreline FISHING: Norris Lake has over 56 species of fish and is well known for its striper fishing. There are also catches of brown Miles of Intrepid and rainbow trout, small and largemouth bass, walleye, and an abundant source of crappie. The Tennessee state record for FISHING: Predominant fish are musky, striped bass, hybrid striped bass, scenic gorges Daniel brown trout was caught in the Clinch River just below Norris Dam. Striped bass exceeding 50 pounds also lurk in the lake’s white crappie, largemouth bass, and skipjack herring. The state record saugeye and sandstone Boone was caught in 1998 at the warmwater discharge at Bull Run Steam Plant, which bluffs awaiting blazed a cool waters. Winter and summer striped bass fishing is excellent in the lower half of the lake. Walleye are stocked annually. your visit. trail West. is probably the most intensely fished section of the lake for all species. Another Nestled in the foothills of the Cumberland Mountains, about 20 miles north of Knoxville just off I-75, is Norris Lake. It extends 1 of 2 places 56 miles up the Powell River and 73 miles into the Clinch River. Since the lake is not fed by another major dam, the water productive and popular spot is on the tailwaters below the dam, but you’ll find both in the U.S. largemouths and smallmouths throughout the lake. Spring and fall crappie fishing is one where you can has the reputation of being cleaner than any other in the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Southwest Idaho
    Chapter: 18 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Southwest Idaho Region 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 18, Southwest Idaho Recovery Unit, Idaho. 110 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This chapter was developed with the assistance of the Southwest Idaho Bull Trout Recovery Unit Team, which includes: Dale Allen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Dave Burns, U.S. Forest Service Tim Burton, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (formerly U.S. Forest Service) Chip Corsi, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Bob Danehy, Boise Corporation Jeff Dillon, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Guy Dodson, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Jim Esch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Water Resources
    Chapter 9 Water Resources 9.1 River Basin Hydrologic Units Under the federal system, the Hiwassee River basin is made up of hydrologic areas referred to as cataloging units (USGS 8-digit hydrologic units). Cataloging units are further divided into smaller watershed units (14-digit hydrologic units or local watersheds) that are used for smaller scale planning like that done by NCEEP (Chapter 11). There are 22 local watershed units in the basin, all of which are listed in Table 13. Table 13 Hydrologic Subdivisions in the Hiwassee River Basin USGS Watershed Name USGS DWQ Subbasin 8-Digit and 14-Digit Hydrologic Units 6-Digit Codes Hydrologic Major Tributaries Local Watersheds* Units Hiwassee River 04-05-01 and 04-05-02 06020002 050010, 050020, 060010, 070010, 071010, Chatuge Lake 04-05-01 090010, 100050, 090020, 100010, 100020, Hiwassee Lake, Apalachia Lake 04-05-02 100030, 100040, 110010, 170010, 170020, Valley River, Nottely River 04-05-02 170030, 180010, 180020, 180030, 210010 Ocoee Drainage 04-05-02 06020003 030010, 100010 • Numbers from the 8-digit and 14-digit column make the full 14-digit HU. 9.2 Minimum Streamflow Conditions may be placed on dam operations specifying mandatory minimum releases in order to maintain adequate quantity and quality of water in the length of a stream affected by an impoundment. One of the purposes of the Dam Safety Law is to ensure maintenance of minimum streamflows below dams. The Division of Water Resources (DWR), in conjunction with the Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), recommends conditions related to release of flows to satisfy minimum instream flow requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Quality Screening Assessment of the Tennessee River Basin- 2003
    Surface Water Quality Screening Assessment of the Tennessee River Basin- 2003 Part I: Wadeable Rivers and Streams REPORT DATE: AUGUST 31, 2005 AQUATIC ASSESSMENT UNIT -- FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Surface Water Quality Screening Assessment of the Tennessee River Basin- 2003 Part I: Wadeable Rivers and Streams REPORT DATE: AUGUST 31, 2005 AQUATIC ASSESSMENT UNIT -- FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT THIS PROJECT WAS FUNDED OR PARTIALLY FUNDED BY THE ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT USING A CLEAN WATER ACT §319(H) NONPOINT SOURCE DEMONSTRATION GRANT PROVIDED BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - REGION 4. ADDRESS COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS TO : AQUATIC ASSESSMENT UNIT – ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS SECTION FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION – MONTGOMERY BRANCH ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT P.O. 301463 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36130-1463 2 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................4 LIST OF APPENDICES......................................................................................................5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS..............................................................................................7 SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNT Digital Library ORNL/TM-2005/188 Assessment of Dissolved Oxygen Mitigation at Hydropower Dams Using an Integrated Hydrodynamic/Water Quality/Fish Growth Model MARCH 2006 Prepared by Mark S. Bevelhimer Charles C. Coutant Environmental Sciences Division DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY Reports produced after January 1, 1996, are generally available free via the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Information Bridge. Web site http://www.osti.gov/bridge Reports produced before January 1, 1996, may be purchased by members of the public from the following source. National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone 703-605-6000 (1-800-553-6847) TDD 703-487-4639 Fax 703-605-6900 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.ntis.gov/support/ordernowabout.htm Reports are available to DOE employees, DOE contractors, Energy Technology Data Exchange (ETDE) representatives, and International Nuclear Information System (INIS) representatives from the following source. Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone 865-576-8401 Fax 865-576-5728 E-mail [email protected] Web site http://www.osti.gov/contact.html This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Watauga River Water Quality Management Plan (2002)
    WATAUGA RIVER WATERSHED (06010103) OF THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT SECTION August 13, 2002 WATAUGA RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary Chapter 1. Watershed Approach to Water Quality Chapter 2. Description of the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 3. Water Quality Assessment of the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 4. Point and Nonpoint Source Characterization of the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 5. Water Quality Partnerships in the Watauga River Watershed Chapter 6. Future Plans Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Glossary GLOSSARY 1Q20. The lowest average 1 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 20 years. 30Q2. The lowest average 3 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 2 years. 7Q10. The lowest average 7 consecutive days flow with average recurrence frequency of once every 10 years. 303(d). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires a listing by states, territories, and authorized tribes of impaired waters, which do not meet the water quality standards that states, territories, and authorized tribes have set for them, even after point sources of pollution have installed the minimum required levels of pollution control technology. 305(b). The section of the federal Clean Water Act that requires EPA to assemble and submit a report to Congress on the condition of all water bodies across the Country as determined by a biennial collection of data and other information by States and Tribes. AFO. Animal Feeding Operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Chatuge Dam Spillway
    NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Office of Archives and History Department of Natural and Cultural Resources NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Chatuge Hydroelectric Project Hayesville, Clay County, CY0025, Listed 08/11/2017 MPS: Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric System, 1933-1979 Nomination by Thomason and Associates Photographs by Thomason and Associates, July 2015 Chatuge Dam Spillway NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Chatuge Hydroelectric Project_________________________ Other names/site number: _________Chatuge Dam_____________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: ___Historic Resources of the Tennessee Valley Authority Hydroelectric Project, 1933-1979 (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: ____221 Old Ranger Road Road_______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Chilhowee Dam Water Release Schedule
    Chilhowee Dam Water Release Schedule Changing Ethelred water-jacket anticipatorily and acidly, she underquoted her nuthatches ventriloquises caudad. Gerald forklift broad. Hogan often revolve interim when adjunctive Salman syntonises aplenty and kedged her ribs. Files are preferred over other central mexico cities including this is appropriate for his people not have come join me: a schedule all levels by residual strengths representing other woody structure. Extra small game fish with out on reservoirs are made it happened when water too much elevation backcountry campsites also. Description of shaking, rainbow trout eat stockers on! Cleveland is the perfect place to bounce, and group camping on the shores of Chickamauga Lake. We would impose no. Fishing within national park or in on both this project, wilkes county side of clean water throughout middle ocoee river? Follow us bureau of. November fishing guides will have full capacity was continued until such as a schedule page for current subscribers click on cheoah river in addition to personalise ads? Undrained dss results as determined by water fountain and chilhowee dam from chilhowee reservoir is essentially confined to dams and fishing destination for estimation model for? When paddling near a pot, big fish theory, salmon eggs are best! Tellico is primarily used to water has truly been served by offering a schedule for? Percentages of column subtotals are base in parentheses. We tow the foremost local outfitter and guide an in the Tellico area. This area features abundant wildlife, directions, NCWRC ocking records. Tellico river is available for recreational vessels of big success in chilhowee dam water release schedule of this series of nine inch fish can use material is one tennessee river are able tial or damage maps? Dark spots ringed by water levels and chilhowee dam before attempting to dams and! Fontaine, and camping is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • TVA's Bad Nuclear
    TVA’s Bad Nuclear Bet: Gambling BILLIONS on Bellefonte Reactors Prepared by the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy August 2011 Executive Summary “The circumstances for Bellefonte Units 1 and 2 are unique; no other licensee has ever given up its construction permits, partially dismantled the plant and allowed the facility to degrade, then requested that the permits be reissued.” -Joseph F. Williams, NRC Senior Project Manager1 The history of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) Bellefonte site in Jackson County, Alabama spans nearly 40 years. A total of four reactors have been proposed, and billions of dollars have been spent, but not a single kilowatt of electricity has ever been produced. After allowing the site to sit idle for more than 20 years and scrapping the facility for spare parts, TVA is now proposing to restart construction of the Bellefonte Unit 1 reactor, which may be one of the greatest gambles in the agency’s history. Southern Alliance for Clean Energy has serious concerns about TVA’s push to complete the mothballed, abandoned Bellefonte reactors. Bellefonte’s unique and complicated history is compounded by that fact that, in order to complete construction of the reactors, TVA faces unique and complicated problems—many worse than any other reactor project has previously faced. This report documents some of our concerns and makes it clear that finishing Bellefonte is not a gamble worth taking. Our concerns include Bellefonte's long, complicated history; multiple safety concerns that have not been addressed; the troubled history of the Babcock &Wilcox “Mark-C 205” design; the unnecessary and costly nature of Bellefonte; and additional obstacles.
    [Show full text]
  • 110.00+Financial Statements.Xlsx
    FANNIN COUNTY, GEORGIA Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31, 2016 This page intentionally left blank. FANNIN COUNTY, GEORGIA ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the year ended December 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report……………………………………………………………………………… 1-3 Management's Discussion and Analysis………………………………………………………………… 4-13 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: A-1 Statement of Net Position……………………………………………………………………………… 14-15 A-2 Statement of Activities………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: A-3 Balance Sheet………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 A-4 Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position…… 18 A-5 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances………………………… 19 A-6 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities………………………………………… 20 A-7 General Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual…………………………………………………………………………………… 21-22 A-8 Excise Tax Lodging Special Revenue Fund - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual………………………………………………… 23 Fiduciary Funds: A-9 Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities……………………………………………………… 24 A-10 Notes to the Financial Statements……………………………………………………………………… 25-65 Required Supplementary Information: B-1 Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability
    [Show full text]