SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda April 26, 2010; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1 Call to Order
2 Approval of Agenda
3 Committee Reports and Recommendations
3.1 Electoral Area Directors Committee Recommendations of April n/a 12, 2010:
1. Non-Farm Use in the ALR Squamish Valley, Area D Bass Coast Music Festival 1. THAT the request for reconsideration of the application for a non-farm use in the ALR, submitted by Bass Coast Projects Ltd. in 2009 for the lands legally described as DL 994, NWD to allow the festival for 4 days per year, on an annual basis, be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) with a recommendation of support on the condition that the festival remain in substantial compliance with the proposal submitted in 2009.
2. THAT a new application be submitted for consideration by the SLRD and ALC if the festival is no longer in substantial compliance with the proposal as submitted in 2009.
See item 5.1.12 for Staff recommended amended resolution
2. Sea-to-Sky Air Quality Management Plan Financial Contribution for 2010 THAT the SLRD Board continue to fund the Sea-to-Sky Air Quality Management Plan and authorize a cash contribution of $659 for 2010.
3. Village of Pemberton Referral of OCP and Zoning Amendment Applications THAT the Village of Pemberton be advised that with respect to their proposed zoning and OCP amendment, the interests of the SLRD are not affected, and no further consultation is necessary, however, the application itself has technical details that need to be SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 2 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info addressed by the Village of Pemberton.
4. Regional Growth Strategy Area Directors Final Proposal Arbitration Representation 1. THAT the Electoral Area Directors Committee supports the draft Joint Statement Regarding Arbitration of the Regional Growth Strategy, Bylaw No. 1062, 2008 at second reading, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1062, 2008” be acknowledged by adding a signature block on the statement for signature by the Electoral Area Directors Committee.
2. THAT Staff prepare a written response on the Regional Growth Strategy for submission to the Arbitrator based upon the October 2009 Electoral Area Directors Committee recommendation.
5. Foreshore Erosion at Furry Creek THAT Staff be directed to investigate options, including costs, for addressing foreshore erosion at Furry Creek and prepare a report to the Electoral Area Directors Committee.
6. Cemetery – D’Arcy/Devine Area THAT Staff prepare a report to the Electoral Area Directors Committee with respect to the establishment of a cemetery in the D’Arcy/Devine area.
7. Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation – Request for Letter of Support 1. THAT the Board provide a letter of support to Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation for their BC Capacity Initiative – Community Comprehensive Plan Phase II proposal, and
2. THAT the Board direct staff to explore with Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation what specifically they are requesting in the way of technical support and advice as an in kind contribution valued at $3,500.
3.2 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee n/a Recommendations of April 12, 2010:
1. Pemberton Valley Seniors Society – Request for Letter of Support
1. THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee
prepare a support letter to the Pemberton Valley Seniors
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 2 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 3 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info Society for inclusion in their application to New Horizon for Seniors – Community Participation & Leadership Grant Program; and
2. THAT room rental fees at the Pemberton & District
Community Centre be waived for the Pemberton Valley
Seniors Society programmes under the New Horizons
Programme.
2. Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee support adoption of the Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan with consequential amendments to update and correct dated information.
3. Pemberton Valley Transit Annual Operating Agreement (AOA) THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee recommend that:
1. The Village of Pemberton (the “Village”) be requested to:
a. agree to the conditions for Annual Operating Agreement (“AOA”) approval requested by the Lil’Wat Nation; b. approve and execute the Transit Cost Sharing Agreement covering expenses up to Sept.30/10; c. support the SLRD Board approving the 6 month AOA running Apr.1-Sept.30/10.
2. The Village of Pemberton be requested to:
a. pass a resolution requesting that UBCM draft an amendment to the Tier 2 and PTIP grant agreements in order to allow the Village to take over the direct administration of these grants and the works to be constructed under them for the geographical area comprising the Village of Pemberton and all Lil’Wat Nation IR Lands serviced by the PVTS, at such locations as the Village of Pemberton and the Lil’Wat Nation deem appropriate; and b. seek the consent of the SLRD Board pursuant to s.13(1)(b) of the Community Charter to undertake public transit infrastructure works outside its municipal
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 3 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 4 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info boundaries.
3. The PVUS Committee recommend that the SLRD Board:
a. approve the AOA as amended for Apr. 1 - Sept. 30/’10;
b. approve the Public Transit Cost Sharing Agreement through Sept. 30/’10; and c. adopt a Service Establishment Bylaw for the Pemberton Valley Transit System; all contingent upon: (i) the adoption of recommendations 1 and 2 by the Village of Pemberton;
(ii) written notice of the acceptance by UBCM of
the proposed amendments to the Tier 2 and
PTIP grant agreements, as requested by the
Lil’Wat Nation; and
(iii) written notice of the acceptance by BC Transit that the Service Review will be completed by June 30, 2010, as required by the Lil’Wat Nation.
Addendum to this item: 12 THAT, in addition to the April 12, 2010 recommendations of the PVUS Committee, the SLRD Board:
1. Pass a resolution of its own requesting that UBCM draft an amendment to the Tier 2 and PTIP grant agreements in order to allow the Village to take over the direct administration of these grants and the works to be constructed under them for the geographical area comprising the Village of Pemberton and all Lil’Wat Nation IR Lands serviced by the PVTS, at such locations as the Village of Pemberton and the Lil’Wat Nation deem appropriate; and
2. Pass a resolution pursuant to s. 13 (1) (b) of the Community Charter consenting to the Village of Pemberton undertaking public transit infrastructure works outside its municipal boundaries.
4 Bylaws
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 4 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 5 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
4.1.1 Bylaw 1089 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw 13 No. 540, 1994, Amendment Bylaw No.1089, 2008 (Britannia Townsite) – Britannia Beach, Electoral Area D
1. THAT second and third readings of Bylaw No. 1089, cited as “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994, Amendment Bylaw No.1089, 2008 (Britannia Townsite)” be rescinded.
2. THAT Bylaw No. 1089, cited as “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994, Amendment Bylaw No.1089, 2008 (Britannia Townsite)” be read a second time, as amended.
3. THAT a public hearing for consideration of Bylaw No. 1089 be scheduled for Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 7 PM at the Britannia Beach Community Centre.
4. THAT the Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District delegate the holding of a public hearing for consideration of Bylaw 1089 to Area “D” Director John Turner with Director Greg Gardner as alternate, pursuant to Section 891 of the Local Government Act.
4.1.2 Bylaw 1113 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area 36 C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 113, 2009 - Summit Road, Electoral Area C
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1113, cited as “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009” be read a third time.
2. THAT Bylaw No. 1113, cited as “Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009” be adopted.
4.1.3 Bylaw 1116 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area 42 C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009 – Reid Road, Electoral Area C
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 5 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 6 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 1. THAT Bylaw No. 1116, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’ be read a third time.
2. THAT Bylaw No. 1116, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’ be adopted.
4.1.4 Bylaw 1162 and Bylaw 1163 - Rezoning/OCP amendment at 51 Copperdome Lodge, Area C: Results of Public Hearing
1. THAT based on the results of the public hearing and input from the Agricultural Advisory Committee and the Ministry of Agriculture, "Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689-1999, Amendment Bylaw No. 1162, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge)" and ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1163, 2009’ be denied;
2. THAT first and second readings of Bylaws 1162 and 1163 be rescinded; and,
3. THAT the SLRD reactivate the bylaw enforcement action with respect to tourist accommodation use at Copperdome Lodge.
4.1.5 Bylaw 1187 - Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Building 70 Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1187, 2010 - Building Permit Fees (April 12, 2010 EAD Committee Recommendation)
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1187, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1187, 2010” be introduced and read a first, second and third time.
2. THAT Bylaw No. 1187, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1187, 2010” be adopted.
3. THAT the Building Permit Construction Value Policy dated March 30, 2010 be endorsed.
5 Staff Reports and Other Business
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 6 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 7 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
5.1.1 Notice of Appointment of Arbitrator for Squamish-Lillooet 72 Regional District Regional Growth Strategy (Final Proposal Arbitration)
5.1.2 Regional Growth Strategy Dispute Resolution – Final Proposal 76 Arbitration – Arbitrator Impartiality For information
5.1.3 Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Final Proposal Arbitration Joint 78 Statement and Appointment of Representative
1. THAT Steven Olmstead be appointed as the primary SLRD representative and Paul Edgington appointed as alternate representative in the RGS settlement process.
2. THAT the joint statement dated April 8, 2010 regarding arbitration of the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1062, 2008 be endorsed.
5.1.4 District of Squamish Draft Official Community Plan Bylaw Referral 81
1. THAT the referral for District of Squamish ‘Draft’ Official Community Plan be received.
2. THAT the District of Squamish be advised that the SLRD is of the opinion that the District of Squamish “Draft” Official Community Plan is consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy as at first and second reading.
3. THAT the SLRD commend the District of Squamish for its commitment to smart growth within the District of Squamish boundaries.
4. THAT the staff report dated April 10, 2010 be forwarded to the District of Squamish.
5.1.5 bc211 Letter of Endorsement 85
THAT the SLRD Board provide a letter of endorsement to the United Way of the Lower Mainland, in partnership with bc211, for 211 service in the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 7 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 8 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 5.1.6 Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan 88
PVUS Committee Recommendation: THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee support adoption of the Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan with consequential amendments to update and correct dated information.
THAT the Pemberton and Area C Recreational Trails Master Plan be adopted.
5.1.7 Pemberton Valley Trails Association Grant Request 173
THAT the Board approve a grant to the Pemberton Valley Trails Association for the MacKenzie Connector and other 2010 trail construction projects in the amount of $30,000, with funds from General Select Funds.
5.1.8 Development Potential under Existing OCP and Zoning- Sunstone 181 Ridge For information
5.1.9 Lillooet & Area Rescue Society PEP Task Numbers & Claims 183 For information
5.1.10 Lillooet and Area Rescue Funding 212 For information
5.1.11 Garibaldi at Squamish Environmental Assessment Report 215
THAT the SLRD comments set out in the Director of Planning and Development report dated April 19, 2010 regarding the Garibaldi at Squamish Environmental Assessment Report be endorsed as the position of the SLRD Regional Board and that the report be forwarded to the Environmental Assessment Office.
5.1.12 Non-Farm Use in the ALR Squamish Valley, Area D Bass Coast 221 Music Festival
THAT the application for a non-farm use in the ALR, submitted by Bass Coast Projects Ltd. for the lands legally described as DL 994, NWD, to host a 4-day music festival as an annual event over the next 4 years (through 2013), be forwarded to the ALC with a recommendation of support, AND that if the scope or nature of the festival is, at any time in the next 4 years, no longer in substantial compliance with the proposal as submitted, a new application be required.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 8 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 9 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info 6 Correspondence Requesting Action
6.1 UBCM – Resolutions Process Review 233
6.2 Chris Donald – Bridge River Valley Evacuation Route: Hurley Forest 270 Service Road Opening Date 2010
6.3 Lil’Wat Nation/Village of Pemberton – Winds of Change Steering 271 Committee Appointment
CAO Recommendation:
1. THAT Director Susan Gimse be reaffirmed as the SLRD representative to the Winds of Change Steering Committee.
2. THAT an alternate representative be appointed to the Winds of Change Steering Committee. [CAO Recommendation: Electoral Area C Alternate Director]
6.4 Urban Systems – SLRD Northern Areas Review 279
7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – March 22, 2010 285 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.2 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – April 12, 2010 299 For confirmation as circulated or as corrected.
7.3 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes – April 12, 300 2010 For information
7.4 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – 305 April 12, 2010 For information
7.5 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 312 – March 23, 2010 For information
7.6 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission 317 Meeting Minutes – March 24, 2010 For information
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 9 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 10 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
7.7 Bylaws 1162 and 1163 Public Hearing Minutes – March 31, 2010 320 For information
8 Business Arising from the Minutes
9 Correspondence for Information
9.1 Municipal Finance Authority (MFA) – MFA Credit Ratings 343
9.2 Local Government Leadership Academy – Provincial Forum 354
9.3 Fraser Basin Council – Thompson Regional Committee Meetings 355
9.4 Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition – March 16, 2010 Meeting 369 Minutes
9.5 Pemberton Skateboard Park – Thank-you 374
9.6 Signal Hill Elementary School – Thank-you 375
9.7 UBCM – Regional District Task Force 376
9.8 Ministry of Community & Rural Development – Regional District 399 Task Force
9.9 BC Water & Waste Association – D’Arcy Water System Award 401
9.10 City of Burnaby – FCM Consultation on Trade Agreements 402
9.11 Village of Pemberton – Fulton Property Support 404
9.12 Village of Pemberton – Regional Growth Strategy Final Proposal 405 Arbitration
9.13 Village of Pemberton – Regional Transit: Annual Operating 407 Agreement
10 Delegations and Petitions
10.1 Kim North – Lillooet Naturalist Society
10.2 Major Dan Thomas - Joint Task Force Games (JTFG)
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 10 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda - 11 - April 26, 2010
Item Item of Business and Recommended Action Page Action Info
10.3 Andrew Beaird – Sunstone Ridge Development
10.4 Hugh Naylor and Lon Martin – Pemberton Valley Trails Association
11 Decision on Late Business (only if required)
THAT the late items be considered at this meeting. (requires 2/3 majority vote)
12 Late Business
13 Directors’ Reports (matters of information, not requiring action)
14 Board In-Camera Meeting
Resolution to move In-Camera
THAT the Board move In-Camera under the authority of Section 90 (1) (a) (c) of the Community Charter.
15 Termination
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 11 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 12 of 408 Date: Recommendation: Local Government Act CAO Comments: Who Votes: ; Count: ; Decision: Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: Relevant Policy:
Strategic Relevance: Desired Outcome(s): Response Options:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 13 of 408
Preferred Strategy: General: Organizational: Financial: Legal: Follow Up Action: Communication: Other Comments: Submitted by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 14 of 408 Background: Conditions of Adoption Design considerations
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 15 of 408
Proposed Amendment Relevant OCP Policies:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 16 of 408
Staff Comments: Attachment:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 17 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1089, 2008
A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994.
The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994, Amendment Bylaw No.1089, 2008’.
2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994, is hereby amended as follows:
(a) Table 1 in Section 5.1 is amended by inserting the (C1) zone under Column 1 and Commercial One (Amendment By-law No 1089) under Column 2.
(b) Section 5.2 is amended by adding the following words at the end of the second sentence: “which remain unzoned”.
(c) The lands which are legally described as the remainder of DL 891, New Westminster District, Lot 1, Plan 19960, New Westminster District, as shown outlined in heavy black and attached to this bylaw as Schedule “A” are rezoned from Resource Use (RU) to Commercial One (C1).
(d) Section 2- Definitions is amended by inserting the following definition after ACCESSORY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE:
ACCESSORY GAS BAR means a single gas pump island consisting of a maximum of two gasoline filling dispenser units which may or may not be covered that is accessory to a principal use.
(e) A new Commercial One (C1) zone is added as follows:
C1 COMMERCIAL ONE ZONE
The intent of this zone is to accommodate a variety of commercial operations and community facilities that will create a vibrant commercial area catering to the needs of both the adjacent residential areas and the travelling public.
Permitted Uses
13.1 The following uses shall be permitted:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 18 of 408 (a) accessory uses (b) village commercial use (c) restaurant, excluding drive-through, (d) neighbourhood public house, (e) one accessory gas bar, excluding service station is permitted in the C1 zone.
Site Specific Use
13.2 Notwithstanding section 13.1 (b) and (c), one restaurant, including drive-through is allowed in the zone.
Parcel Area
13.3.1 The minimum parcel area in the Commercial One C1 Zone shall be 50 square metres for the creation of bare land strata lots and 30 square metres for the creation of building strata lots pursuant to the Strata Property Act. 13.3.2 The minimum parcel area in the Commercial One C1 Zone shall be 1.5 hectares for the creation of fee simple lots, except for those portions of the site to be used for community use, in which case, there shall be no minimum parcel area.
Density
13.4.1 The maximum gross floor area for all commercial uses within the C1 zone shall not exceed 6000 square metres. 13.4.2 The maximum floor area ratio for a parcel shall not exceed 1.0. 13.4.3 The maximum permitted gross floor area for any grocery store use is 750 square metres. 13.4.4 The maximum permitted gross floor area for any liquor store use is 300 square metres. 13.4.5 The maximum permitted gross floor area for any neighbourhood public house use is 370 square metres.
Setback Requirements
13.5.1 No building or structure shall be sited:
a) within 4.5 m of Highway 99 or Copper Drive; b) within 15 m of Britannia Creek, except for: c) buildings and structures constructed prior to 2008, in which case the buildings or structure shall be set back from Britannia Creek as per their existing foundations; and d) structures required for the construction of a protected berm; and
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 19 of 408 e) within a required setback area established by a restrictive covenant registered on title.
Height
13.6.1 No principal building or structure shall exceed 15 m or 4 storeys.
13.6.2 No auxiliary building or structure shall exceed 7 m.
Off-street Parking
13.7.1 Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the following requirements:
All parking spaces and manoeuvring aisles required in this by-law or voluntarily provided shall meet the following minimum standards:
Type of Parking Width of Parking Length of Parking Clear Height Space Space Space Standard space 2.6 metres 5.5 metres 2.1 metres Standard parallel 2.6 metres 6.7 metres 2.1 metres space Small Car space 2.6 metres 5.5 metres 2.1 metres Disabled space 2.44 metres 5 metres 2.1 metres Loading space 3 metres 9 metres 4 metres Minimum Aisle 90 degrees 60 degrees 45 degrees Width Two-way traffic 6.4 metres 6.2 metres 6.1 metres One-way traffic 6.4 metres 4.1 metres 4 metres
13.7.2 All parking spaces are to be measured from centre line to centre line, and to the nearest edge of any curb, wall or landscaped area, measured clear of all abutments.
13.7.3 The width of a parking space abutting a wall or fence shall be increased by at least 0.2 m for the entire length of the parking space.
13.7.4 Up to twenty percent of 90 degree angle parking spaces may be small car spaces, provided each such space is identified and signed with the words “Small Car Only”.
13.7.5 The following off-street parking spaces shall be required:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 20 of 408 Land Use Required Parking Spaces
Commercial Office 2.5 per 100 m2 Commercial Retail 2.5 per 100 m2 Commercial Service 2.5 per 100 m2 Community Use 2.5 per 100 m2 Restaurant 1 space per 4 seats or 5 spaces per 100 m2, whichever is greater.
Where the calculation of required parking spaces results in a fraction, any fraction less than 0.5 shall be disregarded and any fraction 0.5 or greater shall require one parking space.
13.7.6 Parking for disabled persons shall be provided as follows:
Number of parking spaces required Number of disabled parking spaces
1-25 1 26-75 1 additional 76-150 1 additional After 151 1 for every 100 parking spaces
Such parking spaces may be included in the calculation of off-street parking requirements and must be:
a) clearly marked by a painted wheelchair symbol on the pavement; b) clearly identified with a sign not less than 1.0 metre in height displaying the wheelchair symbol and the words “Disabled Persons Only”; c) 1.3 metres wider than the width of a parking space required in Section 13.1.6.1; and d) Located so as to allow convenient access to the entrance of the Principal Use for which the space is required.
13.7.7 All required parking shall be located on the same Lot as the Principle Use, the Common Property of a Strata Plan, within 300 metres of the Lot containing the Principle Use.
13.7.8 Parking may be shared between two or more different uses when it can be demonstrated through a parking report, prepared by a parking specialist, that the uses have different and non-conflicting peak demand hours. Where this occurs, the required parking spaces shall be not less than seventy-five percent of the total of the individual uses required in Section 13.7.5.
13.7.9 All off-street parking spaces, loading spaces and manoeuvring aisles shall have a permanent and dust-free surface.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 21 of 408 13.7.10 Off-street loading spaces are not required, except that one off-street loading space is required for restaurant, neighbourhood public house and grocery store use and shall be located on the same parcel as the principal use for which the space is required.
13.7.11 Five percent (5%) of required off-street parking spaces shall be allocated for off-street parking of electric vehicles and shall be equipped with an electric vehicle recharging station.
Temporary Commercial and Industrial Use
13.8.1 Pursuant to Section 920.9 of the Local Government Act, land in the C1 zone is designated as a temporary commercial and industrial use permit area.
Other Regulations
13.9.1 No residential dwelling units shall be permitted within this zone.
READ A FIRST TIME this 23rd day of June, 2008.
READ A SECOND TIME this 25th day of August 2008.
PUBLIC HEARING held on the 18th day of September 2008.
READ A THIRD TIME this 27th day of October 2008.
SECOND AND THIRD READINGS rescinded this day of 2010.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2010. READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2010.
ADOPTED this day of 2008.
______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
I hereby certify this to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1089 cited as ‘ Squamish Lillooet Regional District Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994, Amendment Bylaw No. 1089, 2008’ as read a third time this day of .
______Paul R. Edgington
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 22 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 23 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 24 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 25 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 26 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 27 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 28 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 29 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 30 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 31 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 32 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 33 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 34 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 35 of 408 Date: Recommendation:
CAO Comments: PRE Who Votes: ; Count: ; Decision: Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: Relevant Policies: Strategic Relevance: Desired Outcome(s):
Response Options:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 36 of 408
Preferred Strategy:
Implications Of Recommendation General: Organizational: Financial: Legal: Follow Up Action: Communication: Other Comments: Submitted by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 37 of 408 Request for third reading and adoption
Background
Public Hearing Proof of Water Requirements
Analysis of Options: Attachments:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 38 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1113, 2009
A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.
The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’.
2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:
(a) That the Official Zoning Map, Schedule C, Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by:
(i) rezoning DL 1251, Lot 8, KAP 71081 as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw, from Rural 1 zone (RR1) to Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub-zone (RR1RES).
READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of January 2009.
READ A SECOND TIME this 25th day of May 2009.
PUBLIC HEARING held on the 10th day of June 2009.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2009.
ADOPTED this day of 2009.
______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 39 of 408 I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1113 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1113, 2009’ as read a first time.
______Paul R. Edgington Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 40 of 408 Schedule A to Bylaw 1113 - 2009
9192
9179 Subject Property ad Ro 9190 e 9183 9188 ag rt o P n to r 2573 e 2579 b 9143 Gates Lake 2567 m e P
9118 2568 2578
9365 2567 2828 2842 2842 2828 9102
9065
9065 9102
9046 ¯
From: Rural 1 (RR1) ______Chair
To: Rural 1 - Rural Residential sub zone (RR1- RES) ______Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 41 of 408 Request for Decision
Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 1116 – 1855 Reid Rd., Area C
Date: April 20, 2010
Recommendation:
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1116, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’ be read a third time and adopted. CAO Comments:
Who Votes: All; Count: Directors; Decision: Majority Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined: Bylaw 1116, 2009 proposes to rezone a two hectare parcel of land on 1855 Reid Road from Rural 1 to Rural 1 – Rural Residential (single dwelling subzone). The rezoning would allow for the property to be subdivided into two parcels of approximately one hectare each.
A public hearing was held in June, 1999. There was one comment of support and two letters of opposition. The opposition is based on concern over increased density affecting the community’s water supply. The Board’s policy on proof of water at the time of rezoning has remained an outstanding item.
Relevant Policy: Electoral Area C Official Community Plan (Bylaw 1008, 2008): Policy 2.2. Development proponents shall consider the significance of heritage resources during all phases of project planning, design, implementation and operation. Policy 4.19. In the Ivey Lake/Reid Road neighbourhood, only those parcels serviced by wells that provide 2720 litres/day on a sustained basis throughout the year for each proposed parcel, and provide water of suitable quality as defined by the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, shall be considered for rezoning to permit one hectare parcels. Policy 4.20. Due to concerns about possible impacts on groundwater supplies, those lands rezoned to permit one hectare parcels in the Ivey Lake/Reid Road neighbourhood (including Lots 1-13 & Lots 19-32, DL 2679 and Lots 14-18 and Lots 33 to 51, DL 4100, all Plan 33675, LLD) are permitted only one dwelling per parcel (including secondary suites).
Strategic Relevance: n/a
Desired Outcome(s): Land use management that is consistent with SLRD policy.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 42 of 408 Request for Decision
Application for Zoning Amendment – 1855 Reid Rd., Area C
Response Options:
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1113 be given third reading and adopted.
2. Do not adopt the subject zoning amendment bylaw.
Preferred Strategy:
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1113 be given third reading and adopted. . Implications Of Recommendation
General: Bylaw 1116, 2009 is consistent with the Electoral Area C Official Community Plan (Bylaw 1008, 2008). Additional information needed to address the OCP and Board policies on proof of water was received on April 12, 2010. See the background report for more information.
Organizational: n/a
Financial: n/a
Legal: n/a
Follow Up Action: update Bylaw 765
Communication: April, 2010 post Board meeting - Inform applicant of the status of the application.
Other Comments: n/a
Submitted by: Director of Planning, Steve Olmstead Approved by: CAO, Paul Edgington
2
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 43 of 408 Request for Decision
Application for Zoning Amendment – 1855 Reid Rd., Area C Background:
On January 7, 2009 Mr. Lon Martin submitted a rezoning application to allow for the subdivision of DL 2679, Lot B, Plan KAP64554 (1855 Reid Road). The parcel is 2.02 hectares and has an existing home on one half of the property. The proposed subdivision would create two parcels of approximately one hectare each.
The subject property is located near the bottom of Reid Road. The Baumann geotechnical report for the Mount Currie/D’Arcy corridor identifies the subject property as being free of any identified geotechnical hazard. The subject property is not within the Agricultural Land Reserve and not within 800 m of a controlled access highway.
Proof of Water
The Electoral Area C Official Community Plan (Bylaw 1008, 2008) requires that the property’s water supply be proven prior to rezoning. At the January 26, 2009 Board meeting the following resolution was carried:
‘THAT the applicant provide confirmation from a qualified professional prior to scheduling a public hearing that an adequate supply of water, providing 2720 liters/day on a sustained basis throughout the year for each proposed parcel, of suitable quality as defined by Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality, is available.’
The applicant has recently provided a water quality analysis from March 31st, 2010 that the SLRD Director of Utilities and Environmental Services has indicated meets Canadian Drinking Water Guidelines. It is noted that the water is considered very hard but within tolerable limits, aesthetic qualities are within the allowable limits and so are the chemical qualities, namely arsenic and manganese.
A public hearing regarding Bylaw 1116 was held in June, 2009. One comment of support and two letters of opposition were received. The opposition is based on concern over increased density affecting the community’s water supply.
3
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 44 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1116, 2009
A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.
The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’.
2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:
(a) That the Official Zoning Map, Schedule C, Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by:
(i) rezoning DL 2679, Lot B, Plan KAP64554, as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw, from Rural 1 zone (RR1) to Rural 1 - Rural Residential single dwelling sub-zone (RR1RES(SD)).
READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of January 2009.
READ A SECOND TIME this 25th day of May 2009.
PUBLIC HEARING held on the 10th day of June 2009.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2009.
ADOPTED this day of 2009.
______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 45 of 408 I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1116 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’.
______Leslie Lloyd Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 46 of 408 -3-
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 47 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1116, 2009
A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.
The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’.
2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:
(a) That the Official Zoning Map, Schedule C, Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by:
(i) rezoning DL 2679, Lot B, Plan KAP64554, as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this bylaw, from Rural 1 zone (RR1) to Rural 1 - Rural Residential single dwelling sub-zone (RR1RES(SD)).
READ A FIRST TIME this 26th day of January 2009.
READ A SECOND TIME this 25th day of May 2009.
PUBLIC HEARING held on the 10th day of June 2009.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2009.
ADOPTED this day of 2009.
______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 48 of 408 I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1116 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1116, 2009’.
______Leslie Lloyd Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 49 of 408 -3-
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 50 of 408 Request for Decision Bylaws 1162 &1163, 2009 Rezoning/OCP amendment at Copperdome Lodge, Area C:
Results of Public Hearing
Date: April 5, 2010
Recommendation:
1. THAT based on the results of the public hearing and input from the Agricultural Advisory Committee and the Ministry of Agriculture, "Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689-1999, Amendment Bylaw No. 1162, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge)" and ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1163, 2009’ be denied; 2. THAT first and second readings of Bylaws 1162 and 1163 be rescinded; and, 3. THAT the SLRD reactivate the bylaw enforcement action with respect to tourist accommodation use at Copperdome Lodge.
CAO Comments: I concur.
Who Votes: All
Recommendation Report/Document: Attached _X_Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined:
The SLRD received a rezoning application for Lot 1, DL 179, Lillooet District Plan 8954 and Parcel M (Plan B5692) of DL 179, Lillooet District, parcels that includes a building known as the “Copperdome Lodge”. The proposed rezoning bylaw 1163 would rezone the subject property from AGR (Agriculture) to a new tourist commercial 6 sub-zone, in order to allow for the existing educational and lodge building to conform with SLRD land use regulations. The OCP amendment bylaw 1162 would redesignate the land from Agriculture to Commercial.
Both bylaws 1162 and 1163 were give second reading by the SLRD Board on February 22, 2010 and a public hearing was held on March 31, 2010. The public hearing saw 27 members of the public speak out against the application. Two people, the applicant, Mr. Ian Porter and his wife, spoke in favour of the application. Additionally, four original letters, 27 form letters and a 68 name petition were submitted in support of the application. Fifty one original letters and ten form letters were submitted in opposition to the application.
On April 1, 2010, the day after the public hearing, Mr. Porter submitted a letter to the SLRD withdrawing his application.
Relevant Policy: 1. Electoral Area C OCP Bylaw 2. SLRD Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.
Strategic Relevance: n/a 1
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 51 of 408 Request for Decision Bylaws 1162 &1163, 2009 Rezoning/OCP amendment at Copperdome Lodge, Area C:
Results of Public Hearing
Desired Outcome(s): That the Board deliberate on the comments made and concerns raised at the public hearing and consider whether the application should proceed.
Response Options: 1. Do not give further consideration to Bylaws 1162 and 1163, rescind first and second readings of bylaws 1162 and 1163, close the application file and proceed with enforcement of the Area C OCP and Zoning Bylaws. 2. Do not give further consideration to bylaws 1162 and 1163, rescind first and second readings of bylaws 1162 and 1163, close the application file and do not proceed with enforcement of the Area C OCP and Zoning Bylaws at this time. 3. Proceed with Bylaws 1162 and 1163. 4. Refer the application back to staff for modification.
Preferred Strategy: 1. Do not give further consideration to bylaws 1162 and 1163, rescind first and second readings of bylaws 1162 and 1163, close the application file and proceed with enforcement of the Area C OCP and Zoning Bylaws.
Implications Of Recommendation
General: If Bylaws 1162 and 1163 are not proceeded with, the matter of tourist commercial use that the SLRD believes is in non-compliance with zoning is not fully resolved. That may need to be determined by court proceedings.
Organizational: n/a
Financial: Enforcement of the Area C Zoning Bylaw will have financial and legal costs to the SLRD.
Legal: If the SLRD seeks to stop the current tourist commercial use, there may be legal implications.
Follow Up Action: As per Board direction.
Communication: As per Board direction.
Other Comments: n/a Submitted by: Strategy Planner, K. Needham Reviewed by: Steven Olmstead, Director of Planning & Development Approved by: CAO, Paul Edgington
2
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 52 of 408 Background Report Bylaws 1162 and 1163, 2009 Rezoning and OCP amendment at Copperdome Lodge, Area C Results of Public Hearing
Issue Defined: On November 16, 2009, Mr. Ian Porter submitted an application to rezone a 1.12 acre property legally known as Lot 1, DL 179, Lillooet District Plan 8954 and Parcel M (Plan B5692) of DL 179, Lillooet District in order to legitimize the existing school use on the site and to allow for an expanded tourist commercial use. In order to legitimize the “legally non conforming” use as a school facility (including lodging for the accommodation of transient students, staff and guests) under Zoning Bylaw 765, Mr. Porter submitted an application to rezone the property. In addition, he requested an additional “tourist accommodation” use (not ancilliary to the school use). This additional tourist accommodation use would allow the “Copperdome Lodge” to carry out business associated with hosting conferences, weddings or for providing nightly accommodation to the general public. Proposed zoning amendment bylaw 1163 would legitimize existing uses and tie the densities to that which is on the site now, with the exception of an additional 56 square metres for storage space in the garage. Proposed OCP amendment bylaw 1162 would redesignate the subject property from “Agriculture” to “Commercial” to reflect the changes in use proposed under bylaw 1163. Both bylaws 1162 and 1163 were give second reading by the SLRD Board on February 22nd and a public hearing was held on March 31, 2010. Following the public hearing and based on input from the Agricultural Advisory Committee and the Ministry of Agriculture, SLRD staff determined that they could not support the application and the associated rezoning and OCP amendment bylaws. On April 1, 2010, the day after the public hearing, Mr. Porter submitted a letter to the SLRD, stating that he’d like to withdraw his rezoning application. This report summarizes the public hearing and associated correspondence associated with this application, with a recommendation that the SLRD Board not proceed with the subject bylaws and close the rezoning application file. The Public Hearing: At the public hearing there were 29 people who addressed the Chair with verbal comments. Of the 29 people who spoke about the subject bylaws, 27 spoke against the application. The two people who spoke in favour of the application were Mr. and Mrs. Porter. There were also 29 written submissions (all against the application) that were submitted to the Chair at the meeting, prior to the close of the meeting.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 53 of 408 Written Correspondence: Numerous items of correspondence have been received with respect to this application and form part of the public hearing record: The total correspondence received in support of this application is: 4 original letters 27 form letters 68 signatures on a petition 2 verbal submissions at the public hearing (the applicant and his wife) Comments in support can be summarized as follows: The property was used for overnight accommodation in conjunction with the Outdoor School with no complaints (1 comment) No issues were raised when the SLRD granted variance permits to Outward Bound (1 comment) Need to support Agri tourism (1 comment) Tourism does not threaten agriculture (1 comment) The lodge provides education and farm experiences (1 comment) Need to legitimize this use (1 comment) The issue seems to be about personality conflicts/ arguments seem ”hollow” (1 comment) The use is not that different than the Outdoor School (1 comment) The total correspondence received against this application is : 51 original letters 10 form letters 27 verbal submissions at the public hearing Comments against this application can be summarized as follows: There is a need to preserve farmland (~35 comments) This sets a bad precedent for allowing the intrusion of non farm uses in agricultural areas (~20 comments) Concerns about trespass and disruption of farm animals and property (~12 comments) Concern about bio security (~15 comments) Concerns about conflicts and complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, dust, chemicals, flies, farm traffic, etc.) (~21 comments) Lodging belongs in a more suitable location and is too far away from amenities (~20 comments) The applicant knew about the zoning when they bought the property (~6 comments)
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 54 of 408 Comments with respect to the original land transfer (its legitimacy, whether it was a mistake, whether this violates the original intention) (~5 comments) The proposal is in violation of the OCP, the RGS and the proposed Agriculture Area Plan (2 comment) The applicant is in violation of the existing zoning and should not be rewarded (3 comment) Whistler already provides tourism opportunities so it is not needed in Pemberton (1 comment) Agri tourism can be accommodated on existing farms (1 comment) This is not a good location for tourist accommodation (~5 comments) The proposed bylaw would allow expansion of the existing buildings (1 comment) In addition, the SLRD received additional correspondence from the Agricultural Advisory Committee, the regional Agrologist at the Ministry of Agriculture and from the Agricultural Land Commission. This correspondence is summarized below, with actual letters attached as Appendices to this report. Agricultural Advisory Committee (AAC) referral: This application was presented to the Agricultural Advisory Committee on January 20, 2010. It should be noted that the land is not subject to BC Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) regulations (due to Section 23(1) of the ALC Act which excludes parcels less than 2 acres existing with a separate certificate of title on December 21, 1972 from ALR regulations), however, the application was presented to the AAC for comment, as the site is surrounded by and may impact Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) designated farmland. At the AAC meeting, it was moved: “THAT the AAC recommends that the Regional Board oppose the application for an OCP Amendment / Rezoning for the Copperdome Lodge, given: - The incompatibility of the proposed use and adjacent active farm operations; - The lack of oversight and the lack of, and insufficient room for, an appropriate buffer between a proposed tourist commercial use and the adjacent surrounding farm operations; - a history and continued risk of confrontation, complaints and litigation; - a perceived bio security risk that could negatively impact surrounding farm operations; - the change would not result in a net benefit to agriculture.” - On March 17th, the AAC members discussed their January 2010 recommendation opposing the Copperdome Lodge proposal in light of the Regional Board’s February decision to move ahead with a public hearing for the application. It was moved:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 55 of 408 ‘THAT the Regional Board be informed that the AAC continues to oppose the proposal for an OCP and zoning amendment for the Copperdome Lodge, given: - The incompatibility of the proposed use and adjacent active farm operations; - The lack of oversight and the lack of (and insufficient room for) an acceptable buffer between a proposed tourist commercial use and the adjacent surrounding farm operations; - a history and continued risk of confrontation, complaints, and litigation; - a perceived bio security risk that could negatively impact surrounding farm operations; and - the change would not result in a net benefit to agriculture.’ Ministry of Agriculture letter: Kim Sutherland, regional agrologist submitted a letter dated March 26, 2010. In this letter, Ms. Sutherland notes her concerns about the rezoning application. She cites issues with respect to conflicting non farm uses, potential disturbances to farmers, concerns about deleterious impacts to farming operations, nuisance issues and the need to strengthen protections around farmland in the Pemberton Valley. Agricultural Land Commission letter: A letter was received on March 24, 2010 from Tony Pellett, Regional Planner for the Agricultural Land Commission. He notes that Bylaw 1162 proposes redesignating the land from an agriculture use to a commercial use, and suggests that under OCP section 6.6, alternative, non agricultural sites should be considered. He also suggests that legitimizing a lodge within the Seed Potato Control Area would appear to be a candidate for an agricultural impact assessment. Conclusion: The subject rezoning and OCP amendment application was met with unanimous non support by the AAC and has met with letters of concern from the Ministry of Agriculture. The public hearing was overwhelmingly non supportive of the application. The applicant has submitted a request to withdraw his rezoning application. The bylaws should therefore not be given further consideration, all readings should be rescinded and the file should be closed. Enforcement of the tourist accommodation use that is in violation of the Area C Zoning bylaw should be considered. Action Plan: Proceed with file closure and/or legal action. Communication Plan: Inform the applicant of the Board’s decision.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 56 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1162, 2009
A bylaw of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District to amend Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689- 1999. ______
The Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This by-law may be cited for all purposes as the "Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689-1999, Amendment Bylaw No. 1162, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge)".
2. The Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689-1999 is hereby amended as follows: (a) Map A Land Use Plan is amended by redesignating Lot 1, DL 179, Lillooet District Plan 8954; and Parcel M (Plan B5692) of DL 179, Lillooet District.as shown on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this Bylaw, from Agriculture to Commercial.
READ A FIRST TIME this 14th day of December , 2009 READ A SECOND TIME this day of ,2010 A PUBLIC HEARING was held on the day of ,2010 READ A THIRD TIME this day of ,2010
ADOPTED this day of ,2010
Russ Oakley Leslie Lloyd Chair Secretary
I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of By-law No. 1162, cited as “Electoral Area C Official Community Plan By-law No. 689-1999, Amendment Bylaw No. 1162, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge)” as adopted ______.
Leslie Lloyd Secretary
L:\Legal\Bylaws\Bylaws\Planning By-laws\PA Community Plan Amendment\PA 1162.doc
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 57 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
BYLAW NO. 1163, 2009
A bylaw of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District to amend Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002.
The Board of Directors of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District, in open meeting assembled, enacts as follows:
1. This bylaw may be cited for all purposes as the ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1163, 2009’.
2. The Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, is hereby amended as follows:
(a) The Official Zoning Map, Schedule C, Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 is hereby amended by rezoning Lot 1, DL 179, Lillooet District Plan 8954; and Parcel M (Plan B5692) of DL 179, Lillooet District as outlined on Schedule A, which is attached to and forms part of this Bylaw, from Agriculture to a new Tourist Commercial 6 (TC6) Sub Zone.
(b) A new Tourist Commercial 6 (TC6) Sub Zone is inserted after s. 10.6, with the remainder of section 10 to be renumbered accordingly, as follows:
Tourist Commercial 6 (TC6) Sub Zone
10.7 (1) Notwithstanding the uses permitted in section 10.1, the following uses are permitted in the Tourist Commercial 6 (TC6) sub zone:
(a) guest lodge of not more than 700 m2 having up to 19 guest rooms plus associated common areas; (b) retail sales and rentals auxiliary to a use permitted under clause (a); (c) indoor recreation facilities and outdoor recreation areas for the use of guests of a use permitted under clause (a); (d) duplex building having a total floor area of not more than 100 m2; (e) enclosed storage of materials and equipment of not more than 100 m2.
(c) Section 10.8 is deleted and replaced as follows:
Except in the TC6 Sub Zone, no more than one building containing a dwelling unit or units may be located on a parcel.
(d) Section 10.10 is deleted and replaced as follows: The parcel coverage of all buildings and structures shall not exceed 10 percent, except in the TC6 Sub Zone, where the parcel coverage may be 14 percent.
(e) Section 10.11 (3) is inserted after s. 10.11 (2) as follows:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 58 of 408 Notwithstanding subsection 10.11 (1) and 10.11 (2), the minimum setback for a duplex building from a south side parcel line in the TC6 sub zone shall be 1.5 metres and the minimum setback for a tourist accommodation building from a west rear parcel line in the TC6 sub zone shall be 2.7 metres.
READ A FIRST TIME this day of 2010.
READ A SECOND TIME this day of 2010.
PUBLIC HEARING held on the day of 2010.
READ A THIRD TIME this day of 2010.
ADOPTED this day of 2010.
______Russ Oakley Paul R. Edgington Chair Chief Administrative Officer
I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and correct copy of Bylaw No. 1163 cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1163, 2009’.
______Leslie Lloyd Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 59 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 60 of 408 March 26, 2010 File: 55000-05
Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Box 219, 1350 Aster Street Pemberton, BC, V0N 2L0
Dear Sir or Madame:
Re: Copperdome Lodge rezoning application
I am writing to offer a few comments regarding the proposed re-zoning application for Copperdome Lodge.
This proposed re-zoning may be problematic, as a hotel is a conflicting non-farm use to ariculture within the Agriculture Land Reserve (ALR) and could serve to have a deleterious impact on current and future farming activities.
There are many problems that arise from conflicting non-farm uses within farming areas, including traffic, trespass, garbage on fields and other disturbances to farmers. Also, very importantly, non-farm users, such as recreational users, or in this case, hotel property owners, can object to the noise, dust, odor and other nuisances that arise from carrying on normal farm activities.
Whereas farmers are given protection against nuisance complaints from neighbors under the Right- to-Farm legislation, decisions by the Farm Industry Review Board show that there is often some mediation required between the farmer and the complainant. In some cases, such consideration for sensitive neighbors may have a deleterious effect on the profitability of the farming operation. In other cases, it may have the unintended consequence over the long term of limiting the intensification or expansion of surrounding farming operations. It is desirable that farmers have the opportunity to change, expand and intensify their farm businesses as they need to, in order to remain prosperous. Conflicting non-farm use in the ALR, can, in effect, reduce agriculture opportunity with respect to some economically favorable types of agriculture.
Currently, some of the farmland around the proposed application is used for seed potato production. Activities such as the dust and noise from land cultivation, the spraying of pesticides and the harvesting of potatoes may become the source of nuisance complaints. In future, the farmers may be carrying on other types of agriculture, as will be profitable at that time, and the farm practices associated with new crops or livestock activities could also become the source of complaints.
Ministry of Agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Mailing Address: and Lands Management Branch 1767 Angus Campbell Road Abbotsford, BC V3G 2M3
Telephone: (604) 556-3073 Web Address: http://www.al.gov.bc.ca Facsimile: (604) 556-3030 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 61 of 408 Page 2
The first draft of the Land Use Inventory by the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands is not yet publically available; however, preliminary analysis of the data shows that conflicting non-farm uses, particularly recreational uses, in some parts of the ALR may be limiting the agriculture opportunity on the agriculture land surrounding the non-farm use.
Pemberton has a rich agriculture heritage that is held not only in its soils, excellent water resources and good climate, but also in its farming families. It has a unique and valuable niche in the current commercial agriculture production system with its seed potato production. Agriculture is an important, long term and steady, primary economic driver for Pemberton. Pemberton, as a food production zone, is likely to become even more valuable in future, growing possibly a wider diversification of crops as the demand for food grows higher with our growing world population. It is important, in this context, that the agriculture production capacity of Pemberton be strengthened, including the preservation and improvement of its land and water resources, and that its farming community is supported in their endeavors to run prosperous businesses.
Yours truly,
Kim Sutherland, MSc., P.Ag. Regional Agrologist Coastal Region
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 62 of 408 Name Location Form COMMENT FOR AGAINST letter? Irene Whistler Provides education and farm experiences X Gutteridge Scott Owl Ridge Disapproval “seems hollow” X McLagan The farming community did not seem to be concerned about the school or the Outward Bound Drew Pemberton The property was used as a school for X Meredith many years The property was used for overnight accommodation in conjunction with the Outdoor School with no complaints No issues were raised when the SLRD granted variance permits to Outward Bound Need to support Agri tourism Need to legitimize this use Tami Whistler X Support X Overbeck Kim Vancouver X Support X Marshall but Pemberton property owner Francis Pemberton X Support X Ingham Melanie Pemberton X Support X Litheureux Ugo Jean Pemberton X Support X Joanne Pemberton X Support X Graham M. Jld?? Pemberton X Support X Aquieszka Pemberton X Support X Bak Alexander Pemberton X Support X Stoll A.Bjorndal Pemberton X Support X Katherine Pemberton X Support X Adams Yannick Pemberton X Support X Labonte J.Adam Pemberton X Support X Jsokee?? Jenine Pemberton X Support X Bourbonnais
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 63 of 408 Jeff Juniper Walkerville X Support X Jenine Pemberton X Support X Bourbonnais Russell Pemberton X Support X McNolt? Sarah Curtis Pemberton X Support X Angela Stott Pemberton X Support X Verdell Whistler X Support X Jessup Alan FIrth Pemberton X Support X Shane Pemberton X Support X Bourbonnais Pat and Julie Pemberton X Support X Kelly Brenda Pemberton X Support X Williams Len Ritchie Pemberton X Support X Inge Pemberton X Support X Flanagan Jenny Bubbs Pemberton X Support X ??Bubbs? Pemberton X Support X Allen Pemberton X Buildings already used for X McEwan accommodation Buildings are already in existence No major difference from Outward Bound Tourism does not pose a threat to agriculture LeBlanc Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Kathleen Mt.Currie X Bad precedent X Scobie Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Bev and Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Corie Bad precedent Newsome Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Anna and Pemberton Bad precedent X Eric Sinclair Tourism opportunities exist in Whistler ALR should be preserved Pemberton Pemberton This would ignore the OPC, RGS and X Farmers pending AAP Institute Expanded uses are proposed Potential for conflicts with farmers Matthew Pemberton Potential for conflicts with farmers X Van Loon Bad precedent Need to preserve farmland
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 64 of 408 Accommodation should be located in suitable areas Delores Pemberton Agritours should be on existing farms X Franz Los Need to preserve farmland Brandy Pemberton Need to protect farmland X Ronayne Biosecurity risk Potential for conflicts with farmers Joe Pemberton Biosecurity X Roynayne Existing lodge is already violating zoning reg’s and should not be rewarded Bad precedent Melissa, Pemberton Concern about conflict with farmers X Bryce,Wyatt Concerns about biosecurity and Hunter Need to preserve farmland Ronayne Priscilla Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Hebert Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Colleen D’Arcy X Need to preserve farmland X Chan Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Dave Fehr Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Stefan Beks Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Laura Beks Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Jeannette Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X and Doug Bad precedent Helmer Concerns about potential conflicts and complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Concern about loss of family farms L.Clements Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X The Martin Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X Family Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Mary L. and Pemberton Bad precedent X Clifford Concern about elite seeds Ronayne There is nowhere to walk John and ? Tourist accommodation next to farms is X Sharon not a good idea Tschopp Pat and Bob Salmon Arm Concerns about potential conflicts and X
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 65 of 408 Priest complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Concern about loss of family farms Don Millerd Pemberton Concerns about potential conflicts and X complaints against farming operations Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Bad precedent People will apply for retroactive approvals Need to preserve farmland Jeff Washington Writer is a customer of the Roynayne’s. X Bedlington State Concern about the potato industry and seed quality Rosemary Pemberton Original land transfer may have been X Walden through forged signatures Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Concerns about potential conflicts and complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Trespass concerns Enhancements and investments to the property do not justify a rezoning Need to preserve farmland John Pemberton Concerns about trespass X Ronayne Concern about seed potato quality Rezoning disrespects the intent of the original land donation Need to preserve farmland Marie Pemberton Concerns about conflicts and complaints X Ronayne against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Need to preserve farmland Concerns about trespass Bad precedent John and Pemberton Bad precedent X Michelle Concerns about a commercial operation Beks challenging farming practices Concerns about trespass Concern about bio security Property is too far away from amenities Need to preserve farmland This rezoning violates the SLRD’s policies
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 66 of 408 Commercial property should be located in a more suitable location Tina Beks Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in a more suitable location Marty and Pemberton Bad precedent X Andrea Van Concerns about a commercial operation Loon challenging farming practices Michelle Concerns about trespass Beks Concern about bio security John Beks Concerns about conflicts and complaints Marie against farming operations (noise, odours, Ronayne etc.) Jack Concerns about a commercial operation Ronayne challenging farming practices Dave Lodging belongs in a more suitable Hellevang location Krista Simms Roxy Kuurne Pemberton Litter X Mark Concerns about conflicts and complaints Kuurne against farming operations (noise, odours, chemical dust, dust, flies, farm traffic, etc.) Harassment of Livestock Increased traffic Concerns about a commercial operation challenging farming practices Concerns about trespass Concerns about bio security Agricultural Area Plan should be completed Meg Gallup Pemberton Original land transfer was a mistake X Do not rezone farmland Anne Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X Pomeroy Autor Chris Power Whistler X Need to preserve farmland X Lodging belongs elsewhere Albert Bush Pemberton Oppose X Geoff Pemberton Oppose X Mcleod Klaus Rotsch Pemberton Oppose X Dave McKinn Terralink Oppose X Horticulture Marie Pemberton Oppose X
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 67 of 408 Ronayne Meg Gallup Pemberton Oppose X Need to support farming Veronika Pemberton Oppose X Vackova Allan Fraser? ? Oppose X Brenda Pemberton, See reasons noted in April, 2010 staff X McLeod AAC report Ray Mason Pemberton Oppose X Lorinne Von Pemberton Oppose X Voort?
John Savage Presidents of Need to protect farmland X and Todd the Delta and Incompatibility with farming May Richmond No room for any buffer Farmers’ A history and future risk of confrontation Institutes Biosecurity risk Valerie Retired Delta Need to protect farmland X Roddick South MLA Protection of farming is in the public and co interest author of the Bio security BC Food security Agriculture Concern about urban encroachment Plan Dave Concern about urban encroachment X Melynchuk, Need to protect farmland and farmers former Potential for conflict regional Can disrupt normal farm practices agrologist Need to discourage non farm uses Connie Pemberton X Alternative accommodation should be X Norman pursued Candice Pemberton X Need to protect farmland X Graham Pat Pemberton X Need to protect farmland X Bencharski Olak Perkins Pemberton X Need to protect farmland X Jack Pemberton Need to protect farmland X Ronayne Concern about biosecurity Neil Van Pemberton Concern about biosecurity X Loon Existing violations should not enable a rezoning Applicant knew this when they bought the land Rhy Walden Pemberton Bad precedent X Existing violations should not enable a
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 68 of 408 rezoning Not a good location for accommodation Concern about biosecurity Concern about conflicts Need to protect farmland Krista Pemberton Not a good location for accommodation X Walden Concern about conflicts Concern about biosecurity Concern about trespass Bev Nolan Pemberton Not a good location for accommodation X Concern about conflicts Anton de Pemberton Need to protect farmland X Bakker Matthew Pemberton Bad precedent X Van Loon Need to protect farmland Jeff Simms Pemberton Bad precedent X Concern about conflicts Need to protect farmland Lea Ronayne Pemberton Bad precedent X Need to protect farmland Tony Pellett Agricultural Agricultural Impact Assessment should be X Land requested Commission Cites OCP policy 6.6 – alternative sites should be considered…
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 69 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT BY-LAW NO. 1187, 2010 M ! O# $ % & ' ()*+,,*P . % # $ % & / 0 1 . / ' 11(2+,1,/ O# $ % & ' ()*+,,* ' 11(2+,1,P + ()* / 0 ! !/ ! / 3 / / / * 410 41 ! 0 5 ! 0 6,,, /5 6+,, %7& 8%..897 +) +,1, %7&7:3'&.897 +) +,1, %7&.;8%&.897 +) +,1, &3<.7& +) +,1, %3! $ $ :
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 70 of 408 +
8 / / ' 11(2+,1,/ # $ % & ' ()*+,,* ' 11(2+,1, +)+,1, $ 7$
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 71 of 408 glennsigurdson.com inc 308 Moyne Drive West Vancouver, BC V7S 1J5 Tel: 604-688-4678 Email: [email protected] Web: www.glennsigurdson.com
Mayor Ken Melamed Mayor Jordan Sturdy Mayor Dennis Bontron Resort Municipality of Village of Pemberton District of Lillooet Whistler Box 100, 7400 Prospect Street Box 610, 847 Main Street 4325 Blackcomb Way Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 Lillooet, BC V0K 1V0 Whistler, BC V0N 1B0 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Mayor Greg Gardner Chair Donna Shugar Chair Colin Palmer District of Squamish Sunshine Coast Regional District Powell River Regional District Box 310, 37955 2nd Ave. Box 800 5776 Marine Ave. Squamish, BC V0N 3G0 Sechelt, BC V0N 3A0 Powell River, BC V8A 2M4 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] John France, Administrator Frances Ladret, Administrator Chair Al Richmond Chair Peter Milobar Chair Fred Bates Cariboo Regional District Thompson-Nicola Regional District Strathcona Regional District 180 N. 3rd Avenue, Suite D 300-465 Victoria Street 301-990 Cedar Street Williams Lake, BC Kamloops, BC V2C 2A9 Campbell River, BC V9W 7Z8 V2G 2A4 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] D. Oakman, Chief Administrative J. Bell, Chief Greg Toma, Chief Administrative Officer Administrative Officer Officer Chair Craig Anderson [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Brian Reardon, Chief Administrative Officer [email protected] Chair Patricia Ross Chair Lois Jackson Chair Russ Oakley Fraser-Valley Regional Metro Vancouver Regional District Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 4330 Kingsway District 1-45950 Cheam Ave. Burnaby, BC V5H 4G8 1350 Aster Street Box 219 Chilliwack, BC V2P 1N6 [email protected] Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 [email protected] Johnny Carline, Commissioner / [email protected] [email protected] Chief Administrative Officer P. Edgington, Chief Gerry Kingston, Chief [email protected] Administrative Officer Administrative Officer [email protected]
April 14, 2010
Re: AMENDMENT of typographical error Friday April 9, 2010 Notice of Appointment of Arbitrator for Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regional Growth Strategy (Final Proposal Arbitration)
Please be advised that a typographical error in the original notice was identified which will result in the following change. SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 72 of 408 The original portion of text read:
“Within 28 days (by May 24, 2010) of my selection all participating parties are required to submit to me a jointly prepared and agreed to statement which clearly and succinctly identifies the disputed issues in the regional growth strategy. See (section 19(1) of the Regulation).”
Please be advised that the new text will read: (find change in bold)
“Within 28 days (by May 4, 2010) of my selection all participating parties are required to submit to me a jointly prepared and agreed to statement which clearly and succinctly identifies the disputed issues in the regional growth strategy. See (section 19(1) of the Regulation).”
Thank you for your attention in the matter. If anyone has any questions or concerns, please be in contact.
Signed,
Glenn Sigurdson
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 73 of 408 glennsigurdson.com inc 308 Moyne Drive West Vancouver, BC V7S 1J5 Tel: 604-688-4678 Email: [email protected] Web: www.glennsigurdson.com
Mayor Ken Melamed Mayor Jordan Sturdy Mayor Dennis Bontron Resort Municipality of Village of Pemberton District of Lillooet Whistler Box 100, 7400 Prospect Street Box 610, 847 Main Street 4325 Blackcomb Way Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 Lillooet, BC V0K 1V0 Whistler, BC V0N 1B0 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Mayor Greg Gardner Chair Donna Shugar Chair Colin Palmer District of Squamish Sunshine Coast Regional District Powell River Regional District Box 310, 37955 2nd Ave. Box 800 5776 Marine Ave. Squamish, BC V0N 3G0 Sechelt, BC V0N 3A0 Powell River, BC V8A 2M4 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] John France, Administrator Frances Ladret, Administrator Chair Al Richmond Chair Peter Milobar Chair Fred Bates Cariboo Regional District Thompson-Nicola Regional District Strathcona Regional District 180 N. 3rd Avenue, Suite D 300-465 Victoria Street 301-990 Cedar Street Williams Lake, BC Kamloops, BC V2C 2A9 Campbell River, BC V9W 7Z8 V2G 2A4 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] D. Oakman, Chief Administrative J. Bell, Chief Greg Toma, Chief Administrative Officer Administrative Officer Officer [email protected] [email protected] Chair Patricia Ross Chair Lois Jackson Chair Russ Oakley Fraser-Valley Regional Metro Vancouver Regional District Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 4330 Kingsway District 1-45950 Cheam Ave. Burnaby, BC V5H 4G8 1350 Aster Street Box 219 Chilliwack, BC V2P 1N6 [email protected] Pemberton, BC V0N 2L0 [email protected] Johnny Carline, Commissioner / [email protected] [email protected] Chief Administrative Officer P. Edgington, Chief Gerry Kingston, Chief [email protected] Administrative Officer Administrative Officer [email protected]
April 8, 2010
Re: Notice of Appointment of Arbitrator for Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regional Growth Strategy (Final Proposal Arbitration)
I write to advise that my selection as arbitrator constituted pursuant to the Local Government Act s 862 (2)(b) has been confirmed by agreement of the eligible parties effective April 6th, 2010, and to give notice as required under section 5 of BC Regulation 192/98 .
If your local government determines it wants to participate in the arbitration process, you must advise me of your intention to participate, and the Squamish- SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 74 of 408 Lillooet Regional District and all other affected local governments as referred to above in writing within 14 days of my selection (April 26, 2010). This notification must also indicate the name, address and phone number of the individual who represents you and their alternate (section 17, BC Reg 192/98).
Within 28 days (by May 24, 2010) of my selection all participating parties are required to submit to me a jointly prepared and agreed to statement which clearly and succinctly identifies the disputed issues in the regional growth strategy. See (section 19(1) of the Regulation).
Within 42 days (by May 18, 2010) of my selection, each participating parties must make a submission to me, and provide copies to each of the other participating parties, a written submission to me which deals with each of the items set out in section 19 (2) of the Regulation including “one specific proposal to finally resolve a disputed issue, which proposal must be presented as specific wording to be included in the regional growth strategy.”
Please be advised that you may not revise or amend your submission after it has been submitted to me nor may you rebut or refute any information contained in any other party’s submission ((Section9(3) of the Regulation). Final proposal arbitration is comprised of written submissions only. There are no meetings or oral hearings. Specific wording and/or map references that you are proposing to include in the RGS to resolve the issue must be provided in your submission.
I will make my decision within 63 days (by June 8, 2010) of the date of my selection, in writing, pursuant to section 20 of the Regulation.
Please ensure that all required notifications and written submissions provided to the arbitrator are sent via email, and with respect to the submission, in hard copy delivered to 308 Moyne Drive, West Vancouver BC, V7S 1J5. My email address is: [email protected], and that of my assistant is [email protected]. The telephone number is 604-688-4678. If for any reason you wish to fax anything to me, please call prior to doing so to make suitable arrangements with my assistant.
The specific dates noted in the letter reflect the required timelines contained in the Regional Growth Strategies Regulation (BC Reg 192/98) http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/reg/L/LocalGovernment/192_98.htm. Please ensure you review this regulation for specifics regarding the arbitration process, especially sections 7 and 16-20, as well as Local Government Act sections 860(4)- (6), 861(2), and 862 http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/L/96323_27.htm#section860.
Thank you for this appointment.
Signed,
Glenn Sigurdson
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 75 of 408
PURPOSE . 91+ % / % = >%=5/ / ? BACKGROUND 4> 15 % = % > :% 1@+A @(5 # / 0
/ B/ C ! ! D / / / /
>5 /
>/5 / ()1
>5 /
8 / # = E: $%& / . /
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 76 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 77 of 408 Recommendation
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 78 of 408
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 79 of 408 April 8, 2010
Joint Statement Regarding Arbitration of the Regional Growth Strategy, Bylaw No. 1062, 2008 at second reading, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1062, 2008”.
This joint statement is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act Regional Growth Strategy Regulation 192/98, Part 3, Section 19(1). As per the timelines established in Regulation 192/98, this joint statement must be transmitted to the arbitrator within 28 days of April 6, 2010.
The issue in dispute is:
Specifically, the text contained in section 1.1 (a) of the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy (RGS):
(i) establish policies that are consistent with the Regional Settlement Planning Map, or a process that will lead to consistency over time; (ii) direct major settlement growth to the Urban Areas, and Master Planned Communities; (iii) prevent major settlement growth in Non-settlement Areas; and (iv) encourage smart growth strategies appropriate to the settlement types and local circumstances.
Concurrence:
Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
______
District of Squamish
______
Resort Municipality of Whistler
______
Village of Pemberton
______
Other Regional Districts (if participating)
______
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 80 of 408 REQUEST FOR DECISION District of Squamish draft OCP bylaw referral
April 10, 2010
Recommendation:
THAT the referral for District of Squamish ‘Draft’ Official Community Plan be received.
THAT the District of Squamish be advised that the SLRD is of the opinion that the District of Squamish “Draft” Official Community Plan is consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy as at first and second reading.
THAT the SLRD commend the District of Squamish for its commitment to smart growth within the District of Squamish boundaries.
THAT the staff report dated April 10, 2010 be forwarded to the District of Squamish.
CAO Comments: I concur. PRE
Background Report/Document: Attached _ Available X Nil __ Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: Pursuant to s. 879 of the Local Government Act, the District of Squamish is providing an opportunity for the SLRD to comment on its Official Community Plan (OCP). Relevant Policy: The SLRD’s draft Regional Growth Strategy Strategic Relevance: n/a Desired Outcome(s): response to the District of Squamish Response Options:
1. Receive the District of Squamish draft OCP, advise the District of Squamish that the draft OCP is consistent with the draft Regional Growth Strategy, commend the District of Squamish for their work and forward the staff report to the District of Squamish. 2. Receive the District of Squamish draft OCP.
Preferred Strategy: Option 1
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
General: N/A Organizational: N/A Follow Up Action: As per Board resolution. Communication: As per Board resolution. Other Comments: None
Submitted by: K. Needham, Strategy Planner Reviewed by: S.Olmstead, Manager of Planning and Development Endorsed by: P. Edgington, CAO
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 81 of 408 Background Report
District of Squamish draft OCP bylaw referral
PURPOSE Pursuant to s. 879 of the Local Government Act, the District of Squamish is providing an opportunity for the SLRD to comment on its Official Community Plan (OCP).
BACKGROUND
The District of Squamish is conducting a review process of its Official Community Plan and on March 30, 2010 they referred their draft OCP to the SLRD. Early in the process, the District requested and received public input and that input has been considered in creating a ‘draft’ Official Community Plan. The District of Squamish is fulfilling its requirements for ongoing consultation by sending the SLRD a draft copy of its Official Community Plan (OCP).
The draft document was developed by Sheltair (now Stantec) and contains 6 parts: Introduction and Community Vision, Community Context, Growth Management, Policies and Objectives, Development Permit Area Guidelines and Appendices and Schedules. Of particular interest to the Regional District are the sections on community context and growth management.
In Part 2.7 Regional Context Statement, the District describes how it will prepare a Regional Context Statement (RCS) within 2 years of adoption of the SLRD’s Regional Growth Strategy. A Regional Context Statement is a key implementation mechanism for member municipalities to respond to Regional Growth Strategies, and is required under the Local Government Act. The District notes that once complete, they will incorporate the RCS into their OCP.
In Part 3 – Growth Management, the District outlines its Guiding Principles for growth management. These include environmental stewardship, natural resource conservation, local economic resilience, housing diversity, transportation choice, community livability, responsible provision of services, community leadership, cultivate partnerships and citizen engagement.
Of particular merit, is the District’s “Sustainability Commitment” in Part 3.9 in which they outline various smart growth principles:
1. Each community is complete 2. Options to the car are emphasized 3. Work in harmony with natural systems 4. Buildings and infrastructure are greener, smarter and cheaper 5. Housing meets the needs of the whole community 6. Jobs are close to home 7. The spirit of community is honoured 8. Everyone has a voice
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 82 of 408 Background Report
District of Squamish draft OCP bylaw referral
The principles relate nicely to the SLRD’s Regional Growth Strategy, which includes similar smart growth principles.
Part 3.10 “Growth Management” the District poses a framework for accommodating growth over the next 25 years. This framework includes five elements:
1. Compact Urban Form 2. Protected Areas, Ecological Greenways and Blueways systems 3. Greenway system, commuter and recreational trails 4. Downtown First 5. Mixed-Use Neighbourhood nodes
Under this approach to growth management, smart growth is emphasized and a focus is placed on revitalizing the downtown, supporting infill and intensification of land use, making efficient use of existing infrastructure, and reducing environmental and financial costs of growth while also promoting connectivity.
The following objectives are stated:
1. Make efficient use of the land base 2. Create a complete community with unique, vibrant and mixed-use neighbourhoods 3. Encourage economic development and the creation of local employment opportunities 4. Ensure adequate inventories of suitable land and resources for future settlement and employment 5. Manage long-term stewardship of the natural resourse base 6. Minimize municipal infrastructure costs for servicing growth and development 7. Preserve natural habitat and sensitive environmental areas 8. Develop a vibrant downtown core 9. Manage and promote the connections between land and marine activities 10. Promote local food production and agricultural activities 11. Undertake area planning
Planning Department Comments:
The draft OCP is a comprehensive, thoughtful and well written document which aligns well with the SLRD’s proposed Regional Growth Strategy. Staff is particularly impressed with the inclusion of a multitude of policies that support smart growth. Some of the highlighted policies of the draft are as follows:
2
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 83 of 408 Background Report
District of Squamish draft OCP bylaw referral
Repeated encouragement of infill development in urban areas and a focus on revitalizing the downtown prior to peripheral expansion; Well-defined Development Permit guidelines with respect to the downtown core which will help to create a vibrant downtown commercial core ; Commitment to protecting and enhancing amenities that contribute to quality of life and preserve the District’s environmental and scenic attributes; Preservation and protection of environmentally sensitive areas and agricultural lands; Support for local food production; Support for transportation options that provide alternative to cars, encourage the development of a safe pedestrian network and an efficient transit system.
From the SLRD’s perspective, the draft OCP is consistent with the regional growth strategy as at first and second reading, which is the Regional District’s key interest. The Planning Department recommends that the District of Squamish be commended on its commitment toward sustainable urban growth within its boundaries, as articulated through its draft OCP.
NEXT STEPS Prepare a response to the District of Squamish with respect to their draft OCP.
OPTIONS
1. THAT the referral for District of Squamish ‘Draft’ Official Community Plan be received.
2. THAT the District of Squamish be advised that the SLRD is of the opinion that the District of Squamish “Draft” Official Community Plan is consistent with the Regional Growth Strategy as at first and second reading.
3. THAT the SLRD commend the District of Squamish for its commitment toward sustainable urban growth within the District of Squamish boundaries.
4. THAT the staff report dated April 10, 2010 be forwarded to the District of Squamish.
3
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 84 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 85 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 86 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 87 of 408 REQUEST FOR DECISION APRIL 16, 2010
SUBJECT: Pemberton and Area C Recreational Trails Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Pemberton and Area C Recreational Trails Master Plan be adopted.
CAO COMMENTS: I concur with the recommendation - PRE
Report/Document: Attached
KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: The Pemberton and Area C Trails Master Plan was developed to provide direction for the Pemberton Valley Trails Recreational Trails Service, established by Bylaw 1035.
The Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee recommended the attached plan for adoption by the Board at its April 12 Meeting (Item 3.4 of April 12 minutes).
RELEVANT POLICY: Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1035
STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: When adopted, the Master Plan will direct the work plan for the area trails service.
DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Coordinated, strategic development of trail amenities within the service area, with consultation from local trail and community interests.
RESPONSE OPTIONS: 1. adopt plan as circulated 2. make amendments and adopt plan 3. do not adopt plan.
PREFERRED STRATEGY: Adoption as circulated.
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
GENERAL: The Master Plan was commissioned as a way to inventory, and get public input on priorities for trails, and how trails within the service area should be managed. Focus is on connections between neighbourhoods and communities, with references to recreational trails.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 88 of 408
The Draft Plan was forwarded to stakeholders, provincial and other agencies for comment, with generally positive response. Specific directions from the referral process were incorporated into the Plan. In addition, staff are currently working with Lil’wat on management plans for trails which cross or are adjacent to cultural sites. This work with Lil’wat may result in some changes to Fig. 3, which shows plans for the trail network.
There are 22 recommendations (page 50) that will form the work plan for the area trails service, if adopted by the Board. The list of recommendations is attached to this report for reference.
ORGANIZATIONAL: Staff and/or other resources will be required to organize the initiatives in the Plan, such as coordinating the Advisory Committee, preparing monitoring reports, acquisition of rights of way, fundraising, etc.
FINANCIAL: Bylaw 1035 sets out a maximum requisition of $50,000, an amount which has been requisitioned in anticipation of the Plan’s projects.
FOLLOW UP ACTION: report to Board outlining proposed Advisory Committee.
COMMUNICATION: inclusion in SLRD monthly press release; communication with stakeholders and public regarding the adoption and ongoing implementation of the trails master plan.
Submitted by: Allison Macdonald
Reviewed by: Paul Edgington, CAO
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 89 of 408 Pemberton and Area C Master Plan - Action Plan Recommendations
1. THAT with the adoption of the Pemberton and Area C Master Plan, the SLRD commits to being the lead and coordinating organization responsible for the implementation of the Master Plan.
2. THAT the SLRD recognizes that the Pemberton and Area C Master Plan relies on the SLRD’s implementation of the Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan (as it addresses fundamental and overarching region-wide trail standards, requirements and processes for recreational trails on Crown land).
3. THAT the SLRD be required to issue an annual monitoring report to the residents of the Village of Pemberton and Electoral Area C that provides information regarding the current status of the Master Plan’s implementation and updates regarding the Action Plan.
4. THAT in accordance with the annual findings of Recommendation 3 above, the SLRD will work with local trail and community interests to ensure that the Master Plan will continue to be a dynamic and relevant document for future trail planning and development.
5. THAT the PVUS consider establishing an Advisory Area Trails Group that provides feedback to the SLRD, as required, on implementing trail projects and funding opportunities.
6. THAT the SLRD work with private interests that could provide connections to complete the Valley Loop and the Friendship Trail to secure rights of way or use agreements.
7. THAT the SLRD make application to the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and the Arts to achieve all Crown lands comprising part of the Valley Loop as an “Established Trail”.
8. THAT the SLRD commence design and construction of the final Valley Loop sections.
9. THAT the SLRD develop a management plan to limit land use and other conflicts along the Valley Loop and Friendship Trail alignments including but not limited to fencing, signage, waste receptacles and enforcement.
10. THAT the SLRD’s Area C and the Village of Pemberton Official Community Plans acquire the Valley Loop, Friendship Trail and other trail alignments identified in the Master Plan through the development approval process, where applicable.
11. THAT the SLRD commence design and construction of the Friendship Trail from the Village through to Mount Currie.
12. THAT the SLRD and the Village continue to work towards enhancing and expanding the One Mile Lake trail system, with priority for a universal access potential for the Lake Loop
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 90 of 408 trail and an all-season(hard surfaced) connection to Nairn Falls Provincial Park.
13. THAT the Village expand the network of hard surface, all season trails to the Downtown from nearby neighbourhoods.
14. THAT the SLRD and the Village work towards providing lighting on commuter (Friendship Trail) and Village’s the network of hard surface trails. All lighting shall be down-shielded and preserve the night sky.
15. THAT final trail alignments of the Valley Loop and Friendship Trails should involve consultation with local emergency service administrators.
16. THAT future consideration should be given to trailhead enhancements as identified in the Corridor Management Plan
17. THAT the SLRD continue to acquire right of ways and construct portions of the Master Plan trail network in accordance with future community priorities and available opportunities.
18. THAT the SLRD give priority to the following future trail expansion areas: One Mile Lake (Signal Hill) area, MacKenzie Basin and the Waterfall Trail areas.
19. THAT a top priority for a major trail infrastructure improvement be a multi-use (with priority on horses) bridge crossing of the Lillooet River and a non-vehicular crossing of the CN Rail line to enable the Valley Loop trail to provide an alternative and safe access to the downtown.
20. THAT new trail routings or major trail improvements would be reviewed within the Pemberton Area in accordance with the process identified in Section 5.7 of the Master Plan.
21. THAT the SLRD’s Area C and Village of Pemberton’s Official Community Plans be amended to be consistent with the Pemberton and Area C Trails Master Plan including policies, maps and/or schedules, including the acceptance of the “net gain” trails policy.
22. THAT the SLRD and Village of Pemberton adopt the Corridor Fundraising Management Plan as contained within the Corridor Recreational Trail Master Plan and that the annual review of the Master Plan include consideration of the fundraising strategy on both a local and regional level as well as the trail service area fees.
Pemberton and Area C Master Plan Recommendations Page | 2
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 91 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TTRRAAIILLSS MMAASSTTEERR PPLLAANN
Submitted to:
Prepared by:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 92 of 408 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Pemberton and Area C Trails Service Master Plan (Master Plan) comprises a detailed overview and action plan for existing and future trail development within certain boundaries within the Village of Pemberton and Area C of the Squamish Lillooet Regional District. The Master Plan describes the character of the trail system together with certain challenges to its enhancement and expansion.
The Master Plan directions identify recommended trail locations, specific to those routes that service commuters or front country users (Valley Loop) as well as singletrack and alpine access trails. Each of the trails’ status is identified and mapped. The challenges to the continuation of the route and/or future expansion is also recognized and protocol development when trails are affected by agriculture, archeological and/or environmental significance, hazardous areas, urban development, user conflicts, ownership, costly infrastructure needs and use of roads/railway crossings.
The Master Plan includes a plan for implementation that through twenty-two (22) recommendations considers trail administration, partnerships and community interests, trail routing and maintenance priorities, right of way acquisition and funding. The Action Plan is specific to lead and supporting organizations, timelines and funding opportunities. There is also integration between the Master Plan and the Sea to Sky Corridor Trail Management Plan’s recognition of certain processes for maintenance, management, conflict and communications specifically related to trails on Crown land.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 93 of 408 TABLE OF CONTENTS
PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Page # 1.0 BACKGROUND 2 1.1 Trends 1.2 Trail Policy and Planning
2.0 TRAIL STATUS 14 2.1 Trail Character and Location 2.2 Character of the Lands 2.3 Existing Trails and Connections 2.4 Trails Use Challenges
3.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 3 3.1 Stakeholder Workshop 3.2 Public Meeting
4.0 MASTER PLAN DIRECTIONS 25 4.1 Recommended Trail Locations 4.2 Trail Development Challenges 4.3 Trail Approval Protocols 4.4 Trail Priorities 4.5 Trail Standards
5.0 ACTION PLAN 51 5.1 Management and Directions 5.2 Funding 5.3 Maintenance and Risk Management 5.4 Communications 5.5 Timeline
FIGURES
Figure #1 – Existing Trails Figure #2 –Environmentally Sensitive Areas Figure #3 – Trails Master Plan
APPENDICES
2:16 PM4/16/2010
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 94 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The Pemberton and Area C Trails Service Master Plan (Master Plan) will become the community’s primary reference document for future trail planning and development in the area. The Master Plan has been prepared through a cumulative process including: extensive research of related information and policies; stakeholder and public input; and comprehensive mapping exercises.
This document is intended to provide the community with a blueprint for the implementation of the area’s preferred trail planning directions. The study area for the Master Plan encompasses the Village of Pemberton and a portion of Electoral Area C, with a focus on the potential of valley bottom trails. The format of the Pemberton and Area C Trails Service Master Plan includes the following sections:
1.0 Background Information provides an overview of trail-use trends together with related government land use policy.
2.0 Trail Status indicates the character of the Pemberton area’s existing trail system together with possible trail user and land use challenges.
3.0 Community Input outlines the key findings of a stakeholder and public engagement session that have directed the Master Plan recommendations.
4.0 Master Plan Directions share key areas of interest, based on the findings of background research and community consultation. The Master Plan specifically identifies recommended trail routes, development challenges, and approval protocols.
5.0 The Final Action Plan provides recommendations on the management direction and timeline on how to achieve the desired trail enhancements and expansion.
The Master Plan is an initiative developed by the Squamish Lillooet Regional District Board for the Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service Area, consisting of the Village of Pemberton and a portion of Electoral Area C.
1
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 95 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
1.0 BACKGROUND
The development of an effective Master Plan must respond to the physical and social environment in which the trails are to be improved and/or constructed. This section provides a snapshot of the potential and importance of trail development in the Pemberton Valley. The premise has been that trail development is not only intended to address the community’s recreational and social needs but may also enhance the local economy, while being an eco friendly and healthy option to automobile transportation. The background information includes a discussion of relevant provincial and local trends and/or initiatives, and a summation of trail related public policy.
1.1 Trends
1.1.1 Provincial Trends
The future of trail related development is directly affected by the manner that this infrastructure supports the provincial initiatives for public health and wellness, economic vibrancy and community vitality. In 2003, BC Premier Gordon Campbell set an ambitious target for tourism in British Columbia challenging this sector to double provincial tourism revenues by 2015. This goal is being implemented through the BC Government’s Tourism Action Plan (February 2007) that includes the following statement to establish “a provincial trails program (BC Trails) for both urban and rural trail systems on Crown land”.
A key provincial initiative is the Recreational Trails Strategy process undertaken by the Ministry of Tourism, Sports and Arts. The Ministry has released a Background Report (May 2007) together with a related province-wide survey, that found that respondents not only equate trail development with traditional use for health and fitness (83%) but also an array of other important quality of life indicators, notably:
Environmental (74%) Community and Social (72%) Economic (68%) Educational (58%) Transportation (42%) Heritage and Cultural (36%)
The Background Report also includes the prioritization of trail development to promote active lifestyles, provide diversity of trail types, ensure community or organizational support, offer world-class trails to leverage tourism, enable access from urban areas to the backcountry and minimize environmental impacts. The following list identified in the Background Report specifically recognizes the value of trails in relation to achieving a healthier community, economic benefits and enhanced community dynamics.
Healthier Community - The BC Recreation Trails Background Report has indicated there will be a growing need for accessible trails for the aging population (low impact recreation), demand for readily available recreational activities (as families and individuals have less free time), affordable options for children to recreate without competition, green
2
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 96 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
initiatives to replace motorized recreation and increased productivity and healthy recreational experiences for all ages, as lifelong activities. Trails are a health benefit to residents when readily accessible to the community.
Economic Benefits - The most recent research related to the economic benefits of trail use is focused on mountain biking; in particular, the Sea to Sky Economic Impact Study (Mountain Bike Tourism Association, 2006) and the Shimano Economic Benefits of Mountain Biking (2008). The MBTA study quantifies the economic impacts of mountain biking in the Sea to Sky Corridor, while the Shimano study considers the US experience. Highlights of each of the studies follows:
Mountain Bike Tourism Association
Sea to Sky trails are estimated to have brought nearly $10.3 million in non resident spending to the host communities over the study period, resulting in $9.3 million of new economic activity through the province. Squamish benefited from $1 million in wages and salaries, 30 employment positions and $175,818 in municipal taxes Whistler benefited from $7.4 million in wages and salaries, 155 employment opportunities and $430,479 in municipal taxes.
Shimano Inc. – Economic Benefits of Mountain Biking
Mountain biking pumps $26 billion into the American economy in direct expenditures alone, benefiting retail sales, services and tourism related industries locally, regionally and nationally. Investing in Mountain Bike Trails has a direct economic impact on local and neighbouring communities * The Great Allegheny Passage in Pennsylvania achieved $14 million in new annual revenue while half finished * The Mineral Belt Trail in Colorado 19% increase in sales tax revenues * Mineral Wells to Weatherford Rail-Trail near Dallas, Texas – annual revenue of $2million Sport/adventure tourism is the fastest growth sector in the tourism industry. About half of American adults have taken an adventure travel vacation in the past 5 years Hundreds of local, state and national downhill, cross-country and endurance events attract thousands of participants and spectators. By providing excellent facilities, small centres nation- wide can establish themselves as mountain bike destinations expanding their local economies.
Community Value - The existence of a connected trail system also provides the communities with added benefits such as:
3
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 97 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Trails can meet the demand for family oriented activities as people are taking shorter but more frequent vacations, closer to home (Go for Green Trail Monitor 1). Property values increase adjacent to tails (70% of landowners adjacent to the Bruce Trail* in Ontario, felt that the amenity was a good neighbour when taking all aspects into account). Positive impacts included getting in touch with nature 64%, recreation opportunity 53% and health benefits 24%. (Go for Green Trail Monitor 2). 80.5% of real estate agents in Ontario indicated the proximity to the Bruce Trail would make their home easier to sell (Go for Green Trail Monitor 2). Linking communities are a primary benefit (i.e. Sea to Sky Trail which is a branch line of the Trans Canada Trail).
* Bruce Trail is a 725 km trail traveling from the Niagara Escarpment to Tobermory.
1.1.2 Pemberton and Area Trends
The demographic status of certain trail-related indicators has been highlighted to emphasize that trail development is and will be an increasingly important component of the Pemberton area’s livelihood in terms of the social character of the community, transportation options and economic generator, specifically:
Escalated Population and Growth Rate - The population of the Village of Pemberton from 2001-2006 increased annually at a rate of 4.4% (a slight increase in the 4.2% annual rate of growth from 1996-2001). From 1996 to 2005 Mount Currie’s on- Band population estimates indicated an annual population increase of 1.7% (Source: Status Band Members, INAC, November 2005, Physical Development Plan, 1996 and Ecotrust Canada Estimates, 2005). As the communities continue to growth, community services and maintenance will need to expand to meet resident’s needs – and trails will be important from a recreation and transportation perspective.
A Young Community - The Village of Pemberton is a young community whereby 19.5 % of the population is under 15 years (BC 16.5%) and a further 41% under 30 years (BC 35.5%). The Village also has a lower number of individuals in the 60 plus age category with only 5% (BC is 20%) (Sources: Statistics Canada 2006). The 2006 population estimates for Mount Currie indicate that in 2006 approximately 25% of the population was under 15 (Source: Status Band Members, INAC, November 2005, Physical Development Plan, 1996 and Ecotrust Canada Estimates, 2005).
Trails planning should consider the demographics of the residents and visitors that will be utilizing the amenities. In a 2007 Mountain Bike Profile for the
4
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 98 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Central Okanagan (BC Parks, City of Kelowna and Regional District of Central Okanagan) the age profile of these recreationalists were recorded. The study concluded that younger people want to see what they can do, while older people want to see where they go thus indicating a need for a range of trail experiences.
Transportation Options - Eighty three percent of residents living within the Village of Pemberton take a car, truck, or van to work (driver or passenger) (BC is 79.5%), yet Village residents scored a higher percentage for those who walked or bicycled to work at 13.0% (BC is 9%).
Further, the Winds of Change Report recommended that there was a strong need to promote safe non-motorized travel for pedestrians between Pemberton and Mount Currie (e.g. Friendship Trail). The Friendship Trail initiative is currently being pursued. In early July, the provincial government provided funding to the area through the LocalMotion program for a pedestrian bridge to span Pemberton Creek (providing second access point to One Mile Lake Park) and a portion of the Sea to Sky Trail multi-use trail connection between Pemberton and Mount Currie.
Local Economy and Jobs - Data related to the Village’s labour force industry and occupations (2006 Census) indicated that 33% of the labour force was employed in either occupations in art, culture, recreation and sport or sales and service (BC 11.5%). In consideration of industry, agriculture and resource industries were at 3%, while residents were most frequently employed in the retail trade at 15% (11% BC). Although not explicit in the Census (tourism does not comprise a specific category) sales and service the front-end workers cater to both residents and visitors.
Further, the recent Tourism Pemberton “Adventure Begins Here” initiative indicates a desire to embrace tourism within the community. The April 2008 Sea to Sky Corridor Recreation Trail Strategy indicates that “trails are an attraction for residents both neighbouring and out of town areas to visit the host communities, thereby providing support for local businesses and increasing economic activity for the region.”
Finally, in part due to the 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games (2010 Games) there is a strong desire to increase tourism in the Sea to Sky Corridor. The local trends indicate that Pemberton will be able to capture additional tourism dollars with the development of a connected and enhanced trail system and related amenities.
1.2 Trail Policy and Planning
A summary of the policy directions, agreements and reports of the Lil’wat Nation, the Province of BC, the Squamish Lillooet Regional District and the Village of Pemberton outlines the importance of trail development in the area. The key directions identified in these initiatives have been drawn on, and in some cases, addressed within the Master Plan.
5
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 99 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
1.2.1 Lil’wat Nation/Pemberton Valley Trails Association
Mosquito Lake Trail Use Agreement - The provincial government recently transferred over 400 acres of Crown land in the Mosquito Lake area to the Lil’wat Nation as compensation for land lost to the Sea to Sky Highway upgrades. The Mosquito Lake area contains a large portion of the Pemberton area mountain bike and walking trails. The Lil’wat Nation and the PVTA reached an agreement that establishes a framework for a long-term co- operation.
Land Use Planning Agreement between the Lil’wat Nation and the Province of British Columbia (April 2008) - This agreement presents the Lil’wat Nations preferred management approach for the Lil’wat Territory resulting from provincial to Lil’wat Nation discussions related to land use issues of mutual interest. The Agreement deals with trails planning and development within the traditional Lil’wat Territory particular the establishment of the Lil’wat Nt’akmen Areas and support for a Collaborative Management Agreement related to the protection of the Lil’wat A7x7ulmecw (Spirited Ground) Areas through participation and implementation of management plans. There are both Nt’akmen Areas and S7x7umecw Areas within the Trails Service Area as noted in Schedule B and G of the Agreement. The Agreement further identifies management directions for these areas, which will be considered and upheld in the planning and implementation affected lands and/or trails. Of particular interest in the Pemberton and Area C Trails Service Master Plan is the existing and future trail infrastructure in the following areas:
22 McKenzie Basin 23 Riverside Nature Park 24 Ivey Lake West 25 Mosquito Lake 28 Pemberton Airport 29 Green River/Lillooet Lake 31 Signal Hill
Winds of Change – This was the final report of the Pemberton/Mount Currie Drug and Alcohol Task Force. The Task Force adopted a comprehensive, four step process to deal with local issues. One of the strategies highlighted in the report was to promote safe non-motorized travel for pedestrians between Pemberton and Mount Currie (e.g. Friendship (Pemberton to Mount Currie) Trail).
6
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 100 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
1.2.2 Province of BC
”Sea to Sky Land” and Resource Management Plan - On April 11, 2008, the province approved the Sea to Sky Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP). The LRMP considers approximately 1,091,000 hectares of Crown lands encompassing the headwaters of the Lillooet River to Harrison Lake, and from Lions Bay and Indian Arm to D'Arcy. The approved LRMP reflects First Nations' land-use agreements and provides management directions. The LRMP recognizes the importance and diversity of recreational trails in the region but also indicates that the activities and routes be managed as not to compromise other land uses such as: First Nation cultural places, archaeologically significant areas and sites, conservation areas and resource uses.
Recreation Trails Strategy for British Columbia - The province has recently completed the Recreational Trails Strategy for British Columbia that is intended to be "a multi-phased approach to developing a trails strategy in the province". The first phase of the four phase process involved extensive research into successful models from other jurisdictions as well as analysis of the results of a widely distributed survey of trail users and managers. The second phase developed the Strategy with input from a stakeholder and multi-agency committee and local communities. Implementation of the Strategy is intended to foster a world-class sustainable trail network.
The Trails Strategy will assist in prioritizing the use of Crown land for recreational activities together with resource uses and development.
A Guide to Using and Developing Trails in Farm and Ranch Areas - In 2005 the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands printed A Guide to Using and Developing Trails in Farm and Ranch Areas. The Guide is intended to provide trail planners, developers and managers suggestions and recommendations on how to reduce impacts on agricultural lands. In particular, the Guide identifies the issues and opportunities on how to develop a positive working relationship with the affected agricultural community. A Trail Development Tool box is provided that outlines design solutions that can mitigate possible conflicts. The Tool box recognizes the importance of:
Ensure that trail users are the most appropriate for the type of trail and trail location; Locate trail routes that go around rather than through farm and ranch lands and when not possible consider alternative routings to accommodate seasonal needs of the agricultural use; Leave visual and physical barriers between the trail and the agricultural use (fencing, physical separation, water features, vegetation and elevation). Install a well designed and coordinated sign system that provides information about trail use behaviour, trail information, interpretation and advertisement.
7
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 101 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The Guide also considers management solutions to limit the conflicts between the user groups, through the instituting of the following: A Code of Conduct to inform users about responsible trail use in agricultural areas; Trail/Trailhead Closures to institute during intense or sensitive farm operations; Volunteers to ensure safe use of the trail during periods of active farm use); Communication with Landowners/Ranchers/Farmers to keep the agricultural users involved in the planning, and design and management of proposed trail; Long Term Management to maintain contact with the agricultural community and work with them to resolve issues (this may involve a level of enforcement); and Maintenance to ensure reliable and timely trail maintenance to minimize trial impacts.
The Guide provides information on how to implement the tolls and management solutions.
1.2.3 Squamish Lillooet Regional District
Sea to Sky Corridor Recreation Trail Strategy and the Corridor Recreational Management Plan - In early 2007 the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts entered into a Partnership Agreement with the SLRD for the shared management of various Corridor trails established under the Forest and Range Practices Act. The SLRD had further passed the Sea to Sky Recreational Trail Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1006, 2007. The Agreement provided financial resources and direction for the management and maintenance of the trails. The agreement is based on MTCA policy whereby trail building may be authorized provided that land and resource use issues and public safety issues can be appropriately dealt with.
The Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan (Management Plan) evolved from this agreement being a partnership between the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts (formerly the Ministry of Tourism, Sport and the Arts) and the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District (SLRD) that balances trails situated on Crown land with provincial interests such as new development or traditional resource activities. More specifically, the Management Plan is intended to implement the directions contained within the Sea to Sky Corridor Recreation Trail Strategy (Trail Strategy) and the SLRD/Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts (MTCA) Partnership Agreement. The Management Plan primarily focuses on the legal authorization, establishment, management and maintenance of non-winter trails situated on Crown land within the Sea to Sky region.
Regional Growth Strategy - The Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) is a provincially mandated approach to planning which identifies and prioritizes goals across the region that meet common social, economic, and environmental objectives specific to land use, transportation, housing,
8
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 102 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
economic development, social issues, ecological stewardship (air & water quality), parks and natural areas, and regional services.
The RGS is being created over a multi-year period, and is a collaborative process that includes ongoing consultation with local, regional, provincial and federal governments, the public and First Nations. Although not yet adopted (anticipated late 2008) the RGS supports trails planning and development, specifically as follows:
Encourage compact, mixed use developments that minimize the use of vehicles; promote pedestrian friendly environments; and provide highly interconnected trail networks. Encourage the continued development of trails and bicycle routes that provide for safe hiking and biking in the region through discussions with community organizations, participants, the Ministry of Transportation, the Ministry of Tourism, Sport and the Arts, CN Rail and property owners. Ensure trail/routes will facilitate transportation alternatives and outdoor recreation activities within a regional trails and bicycle network. Preserve and maintain existing trails and plan new trails for the future in collaboration with provincial, regional and local land managers including the Agricultural Land Commission, landowners in the ALR, clubs and stakeholders. Compile and undertake a new inventory of recreational opportunities & facilities available and linkage opportunities. Support the development of infrastructure / recreational trail and greenway systems that link communities with regional parks.
Area C – Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1008 - The Area C OCP includes several specific policy directions related to future trail development and enhancements, as follows:
Recognition that cultural heritage includes the identification, protection and conservation of historic trails; Ensure that the future comprehensive development designation includes provision for enhanced non-motorized recreation trail network and pedestrian pathways and that involve no net loss of trails; Consultation should be provided to ensure that farm operations are not adversely affected by recreational trail plans, designs and management. Negotiations should to continue with CN Rail regarding secured access to the proposed Riverside Nature Park. OCP Objectives for a Trail Network consider: integrated road, trail and transit system that encourages the increased use of bicycles; promote an interconnected network of trails and green spaces; and increase the safety of pedestrians and cyclists.
9
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 103 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
OCP Policies for the Trail Network include: to work with the Village, Lil’wat Nation, provincial agencies, the Agricultural Advisory Committee, local community groups, landowners and others to coordinate the formal designation and development of the trail network; Public trails in agricultural areas shall be located and developed in a manner that avoids or minimizes conflict with farm operations Consider Cycling Infrastructure Partnership Program or similar initiatives New development to facilitate efficient cyclist and pedestrian movement; Identify and formalize appropriate locations for public access to local rivers; Clarification of proposed trail locations and approval processes/use relating to private property, Mosquito Lake Recreation Area, Crown Reserve dykes, environmental constraints, Agricultural Land Reserves, BC Rail (CNR) access, signs, use guidelines and facilities. Support for dedicated cycling lanes and signage to facilitate commuter cycling along Highway 99, Pemberton Meadows Road, and other roads while working with the Ministry of Transportation to establish a safe crossing of Highway 99-Lillooet River Bridge.
Pemberton Valley Network Plan (OCP Amendment Bylaw 734, 2001) – This Network Plan was incorporated into the previous Area C Official Community Plan. The Network Plan recognized the” establishment of a system of linear parkways, corridors approximately three metres in width, which are designed to be accessible where appropriate to a variety of users including pedestrians, cyclists, and/or equestrians”. The proposed trails are intended for non-motorized, non-commercial use. Highlights of the Network Plan are as follows:
provides trails for walkers, hikers, cyclists, equestrians, and cross country skiers, along with community green spaces that take advantage of existing natural and recreational amenities. includes safe and efficient links for bicycle commuting between important community nodes and thus increases the transportation choices available to local residents. includes four components of the recreational trails network as the Valley Loop, Mosquito Lake Forest Recreation Area, Riverside Nature Park, and Regional Connections. recognizes the objective to create and maintain, through coordinated planning and logical phasing, an interconnected network of multi-use trails and green spaces that protect and enhance public access to the diverse recreational opportunities of the Pemberton Valley. outlines policies that include more specific directions related to use, user groups, mapping, signage, funding, park dedications,
10
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 104 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
consultation, farm conflict areas, dyke access, recreation areas, nature areas and regional trail initiatives.
Cycling Network Plan (2002 Appendix 1 to the Area C OCP) - The Cycling Network Plan was intended to facilitate and promote commuter cycling in the Pemberton Valley through the development of safe and efficient bicycle routes that connect the residential, commercial, employment and recreation centres located in and around the communities of Pemberton and Mt. Currie.
The Cycling Network Plan identifies six network projects, specifically: Pemberton – Mt. Currie Highway Right of Way/Bike Lane Fraser Road Connector/MoT Right of Way Pemberton Meadows Road Right of Way/Bike Lane Airport Road Village Links; and Ivey Lake Loop.
Policy Directions contained within the Cycling Network Plan considers: Funding options design routes for accessibility and convenience of development for local bicycle commuters Where feasible, new cycle routes on Ministry of Transportation roads/rights of way will be designed to meet Transportation Association of Canada standards Design and operations of cycle routes will be carried out in a way that does not cause users to contravene the Motor Vehicle Act.
Implementation of the plan recommends and supports the following measures: Community consultation Local advocacy Coordination with provincial agencies Identification of potential funding sources: Monitoring and Evaluation:
Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service Establishment Bylaw 1035, 2006 - This bylaw “established a service for the purpose of providing a recreational trails service and shall be known as the “Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service Bylaw”. The Bylaw enables the SLRD Board to enter into contracts to provide recreational trails within the identified service area.
11
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 105 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The annual cost of providing the service is to be recovered from the service area participants by: property value taxes, parcel taxes, fees and charges, revenue raised by other means and revenues received by way of agreement, enterprise, gift, grant or otherwise. Under the existing bylaw, the maximum amount that may be requisitioned annually for the service is $50,000.
1.2.4 Village of Pemberton
Pemberton Strategic Plan - The Village of Pemberton has adopted a four-pillar document for the community. Specific actions of moving the community towards sustainability includes the following:
Enhance Pemberton’s walkability through stroller friendly sidewalks, bike lanes, trails plans and handicapped accessibility. The Pemberton Creek Bridge is a priority, alongside the Frontier Street Downtown Revitalization Plan (recently granted provincial LocalMotion monies). A trails plan for the Village is also on the work program.
Pemberton Official Community Plan - The land use plan for the Village recognizes the importance of trails throughout the document, notably:
12
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 106 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Pemberton Vision for the Future The trail system is to accommodate pedestrians, cyclists and cross country skiing. A trails system that will unify the community by providing a continuous link among the Village’s natural amenities and its activity areas. Land Use Policies Require new developments to assume the cost of developing new portions of the trail. Plan the trail system to be a coordinated effort between the Village and the SLRD.
One Mile Lake Master Plan - This plan provides a program for the enhancement of this popular park, lake and trail system. In particular, the Master Plan identifies certain priorities for trail related improvements, including:
A safe route along the section that currently spans the edge of Highway 99 Need for Lakeside Trail directions (environmental issues and opportunities); Bicycle and pedestrian trail system links to several key locations within the community; Bike trail “spurs” but not through wildlife viewing areas; Design trails to better accommodate the current level of use; reclamation of unauthorized trails by dedicating challenging trails to mountain bikes and/or the use of bike stiles to limit access to some trails for pedestrians only; and Old access road can be a new trailhead for cyclists.
Issues and opportunities were also identified including additional access points, infrastructure improvements, signage, management requirements and parking.
Winds of Change Refer to summary provided in Section 1.2.1.
13
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 107 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
2.0 TRAIL STATUS
The Pemberton Area has an endured history of trail building and use providing access to culturally significant areas, to transport goods or for unique recreational experiences. The following section provides a brief description of the character of Pemberton area trails, their location and terrain as well as recognized challenges and conflicts for trail development.
2.1 Trail Character and Location
The Sea to Sky Corridor Recreation Trail Strategy indicates that the Pemberton area offers a trail network of approximately 171 km. The existing trails vary from relatively flat, multi-use trails in the Valley to more renowned mountain bike descents along the steeper mountain slopes. The majority of the trails are within relative close proximity to populated areas.
The degree of difficulty of the trails range from: Green circle 20% Blue square 34% Black diamond 32% Double black diamond 14%
The existing trails within the Pemberton area are identified within Figure #1.
2.2 Character of the Lands
The Pemberton Valley provides a unique geographical setting were a fertile valley is surrounded by spectacular mountain terrain. In particular Pemberton is well suited for a diverse trail network considering the local climate, topography, natural environment, and culture.
Local Climate – The Coast Mountains protect the Pemberton Valley and create a partial rain shadow effect. For the most part Pemberton’s trails are clear of snow earlier that Whistler, and provide a drier experience. During the summer months the temperatures can rise above 30 degrees.
Topography - The picturesque linear valley has several opportunities for a trail network. The relatively flat valley lands facilitate both commuter and leisure recreational use. The valley is also home to several flood protection dykes on Crown land that provide routing opportunities.
The higher elevations provide a more challenging trail environment for day long hikes or more experienced equestrian or mountain bike trails. These trails provide spectacular views of the surrounding valley and mountains.
The valley road network (and right of way) also captures trail users, particular commuters. As the east / west roads comprise primarily the Pemberton Valley Road and Highway 99. These roads, however, permit relatively high speeds
14
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 108 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
resulting in several fatalities and injuries where cyclists or walkers have been struck by automobiles.
Natural Environment - The natural features also provide unique sightseeing and destinations. The Pemberton trail network provides access to mature forests, wetland habitats, high elevations, waterfalls and other extraordinary experiences.
Culture – The Pemberton Valley provides a snapshot of traditional BC culture, from the earliest Lil’wat peoples who relied on the rivers and creeks together with the fruits of the natural vegetation for their livelihood, to the first pioneering farmers that sustained themselves on the nutrient rich lands. The area continues to be an important agricultural producer providing agri-tourism opportunities including the annual Slow Food Cycle.
Tenure - Although the majority of existing trails are located on Crown land (82%), many of these trails are in part on lands that are part of the agreement with the Lil’wat Nation and may be subject to future development. The remaining 18% of the trails are on private lands, which in some cases may be subject to development pressures.
2.3 Existing Trails and Connections
As part of developing the Trails Master Plan, the directions of both local jurisdictions and community consultation were collected and recognized. As identified in Section 1.2, the local and regional governments have identified certain key trail improvements or connections that are important to meet community goals. In particular, these enhancements include:
Secured access to the proposed Riverside Nature Park; Public access to local rivers; Cycling lands and signage to facilitate commuter cycling along Highway 99, Pemberton Meadows Road, Fraser Road Connector, Airport Road, Village Links and Ivey Lake Loop; Safe crossing of Highway 99-Lillooet River Bridge; Safe and efficient links between important community nodes; Valley Loop, Mosquito Lake Forest Recreation Area, Riverside Nature Park and Regional Connectors; Build Pemberton Creek Bridge alongside Frontier Street; and
15
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 109 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Re-route One Mile Lake trail to avoid use of Highway and rather use the old access road for a new trailhead for cyclists.
The public consultation sessions also identified several necessary trail improvements, as follows:
Completion of Valley Loop; A need for a horse friendly crossing (non-motorized) of the Lillooet River (Clover Road); Trail expansion in the MacKenzie Basin; Friendship Trail between Mt. Currie and Ravenscrest (consider alignment south of CN line; Trails in and around Signal Hill Elementary; New trail development areas including Upper Mosquito Lake, below Erikson Road, foot of Mt. Currie, Sea to Sky south (west of Highway) route to Nairn Falls; and Trails to destinations including Mosquito Lake, Erickson area, Nairn Falls, Waterfall Trail, and the Riverside sandbar.
Another important consideration of trail enhancements is the continuation of signage that clearly identifies the status of the permit trail use. Trails, primarily in the valley, often cross both public and private lands. The signage program that clearly recognizes the status of trail access should be expanded.
2.4 Trail Use Challenges
The review of related background information as well as the stakeholder and community consultation sessions brought forward several concerns related to local trail use. From a provincial perspective the top issues relate to the impact on the natural environment, liability of the use, suitable trail regulations and management, and appropriately accommodating users (residents, visitors, commercial use, recreation).The Pemberton area’s issues specifically relate to the following:
2.4.1 Agricultural Land Use
The most prominent issue in the Pemberton area related to trail activities is its impact on local farming and ranching. Pemberton has traditionally been an agricultural community (potatoes, berries, produce and grazing). The agricultural lands are the farmers’ livelihood, where great care is taken in nurturing and protecting their lands and crops. The primary concerns related to the interface between trails and farming uses include the following:
threatening the agricultural use and functioning of the land by trespassing, taking crops, littering and/or vandalizing (including fire); unknowingly introducing invasive plant species; and allowing pets to disrupt farm activities and livestock.
Further in some cases the farming activities could compromise the trail’s recreational experience through encroachment onto a right of way, irrigation, spraying, fertilizing (noxious odors), fences, gates and other agricultural activities.
16
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 110 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
2.4.2 Protection of Cultural, Historic and/or Archaeological Sites
Trails have potential to impact sensitive cultural, historic and/or archaeological sites. The Pemberton area and the Lil’wat Nation are just beginning to understand the value of certain areas. As previously stated in Section 1.2.1, the approved LRMP reflects First Nations' land-use agreements and provides management directions particularly relating to protecting: First Nation cultural places, archaeologically significant areas and sites, conservation areas and resource uses.
An important component to trails planning in the Pemberton area is working with First Nations regarding the planning and management of trails, considering proposed maintenance or development on sensitive cultural, archaeological and historic sites. These directions outlined in a provincial agreement with the Lil’wat Nation, (BC Agreement on Land Use Planning) which together with the LRMP recognize important cultural and spiritual places. Mosquito Lake Petroglyph Trails are considered to be important conduits for First Nation culture, pride and livelihood, notably to recognize and protect areas of cultural significance, complement cultural tourism (commercial and non-commercial use of trails), provide activities and skills for children, youth, adults and elders, identify connections throughout the traditional territory as well as recognize First Nations territory and culture through signage, naming and routing. In addition trails shall be sensitively located and designed as not to invite public access into areas that may compromise their spiritual or historical significance.
2.4.3 Land Tenure
Existing and potential Pemberton area trails are located on Crown lands, private property, BC Parks and Village land holdings/parks/tenures. An important objective of the Master Plan is therefore to identify existing and proposed trail alignments and ensure that the trails will be secured in perpetuity. The following outlines the challenges related to establishing tenure for existing and proposed trails:
Crown (provincially owned) Lands - Although many of the trails are located on Crown lands, this does not ensure that the routes are secured in the long term. In most cases these properties are either currently or proposed to be utilized for other provincial purposes such as resource, agriculture or grazing uses, park or protected areas, flood protection works (dykes), and/or highway rights of way.
17
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 111 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan for the Sea to Sky region highlights the process to secure the trail use on these public lands, in perpetuity. In particular trails on Crown land should be established under Section 56 of the Forest and Range Practices Act (unless already part of a provincial park). To achieve the established status the trails are typically mapped for public awareness and managed through agreements with a local recreational organization (or local government).
Established trails receive consideration in resource planning; however, achieving this status does not guarantee the conservation of the trail in the same sense as a park or protected area as it shall not unduly impact industrial uses. The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts are currently developing a trail rating system for the level of protection of the established trails (refer to the Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan).
Private Property - There are a considerable number of trails that are currently or will soon be on private property, which may be categorized as follows:
Existing Trespassing Trails are, in most cases where informal pathways that experienced limited users, until more recently when Pemberton’s population expanded. There are several instances where property owners have barricaded access points, as to limit public access and/or liability concerns.
Permitted Existing Trails are informal trails, where the property owners have allowed (both legally and informally) use of the property for trail access.
Existing Trails on Recently Designated Private Property - The Lil’wat Nation has recently received title from the provincial government for more than 400 acres of Crown land in the Mosquito Lake area.
BC Parks – Nairn Falls Provincial Park is within the study area. Trail construction or improvements will not be permitted on these lands without BC Parks approval.
Village of Pemberton – The Village of Pemberton owns certain lands that accommodate trail use, being existing parks, a road right of way or dedicated trails.
2.4.4 Environmentally Sensitive Lands
The Pemberton and Area C Official Community Plan has identified several areas with environmental sensitivity including: riparian areas, old growth forest, and wildlife areas. Trail activities in most case will directly interface with these designated areas. Of particular importance to trails planning are the wildlife corridors and management areas. Figure #2 delineates deer, moose and goat winter range as well as small areas of Spotted Owl Resource Management Zone and Critical Wildlife Movement Corridors.
18
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 112 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
2.4.5 Natural Hazards
The Area C OCP indicates that there are natural hazards within the study area. As noted in Figure #2, the Pemberton area is dominated by watercourses and during heavy rainfall or spring melt can cause extensive flooding to the valley floor.
In addition, the area has identified geological hazards primarily focused in and around the Mosquito Lake area. The known hazards include debris flows, rock fall, rock avalanches, and flooding. The draft OCP references a three tiered hazard risk rating system.
2.4.6 New Development
It is recognized in the introductory sections of this Master Plan that Pemberton is a rapidly growing community, whereby such growth goes hand and hand with new development projects. The Village has indicated that there has been a total of 360 building permits issued in the past five years (2003-2008).
Also there are several significant development projects currently in the planning stages including:
Sunstone Ridge/Ravenscrest Development (Village Boundary Expansion) - For the past several years there has been pressure to develop lands east of the Village along the Pemberton Valley’s south facing slopes. Although the plan initially considered only a few land holdings, it has expanded to include a large portion of Crown lands just south of the Mosquito Lake Recreation Area. The properties are currently part of a proposed boundary expansion being considered by the Village of Pemberton. Currently the majority of the existing Mosquito Lake trails are located on these private land holdings.
BCR Lands/Signal Hills Homes - A large land holding within the Village of Pemberton has recently been approved for development. These lands currently contain existing unimproved trails, which could be further enhanced if integrated into a detailed site plan for the area and may include a pedestrian crossing of the CN Rail tracks to downtown.
2.4.7 Potential Trail Use Conflicts
19
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 113 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Pemberton’s past has been closely defined by trail use in the area. Before rail service entered the valley in 1914, settlers relied on both the Pemberton Trail (to Squamish) and the Douglas Trail (to the Birkenhead River where it headed east to D’Arcy) for their respective travels to BC’s coast and interior. Both of these trails were built on the traditional footpaths that First Nations had been using for centuries for moving trade goods in and out of the area. The trails were later made wider to accommodate pack horses on the Pemberton Trail and wagons on the Douglas Trail. These trails have and continue to be used for hunting, recreation, equestrian and livestock. More recently mechanized and motorized users.
The increased number and diversity of trail users will put additional pressures on the success and desirability of the Pemberton trails. It will be important that the trails be suitably managed to provide a safe and enjoyable trail system appropriate for the community.
2.4.8 Flood Protection
Crown land dykes fall under the mandate of the Ministry of the Environment Water Stewardship, therefore any trail development must not compromise the works and/or public safety. The Pemberton Valley Dyking District are subject to the Dike Maintenance Act to maintain the safety and integrity of dikes and to prevent detrimental effects on other parties and river processes. The Valley Loop is for a large part located on Crown land dikes.
2.4.9 Significant Infrastructure Improvements
Significant (costly) infrastructure improvements likely will be required to appropriately address the more tangible challenges identified within this section. In particular, such works would enable the crossing of watercourses, rail lines and separate possibly conflicting uses.
2.4.10 Use of Road and/or Rail Rights of Way or Crossings
To enable an integrated trail system within the Pemberton area, it will be necessary to utilize and/or cross existing road and rail rights of way. In particular, Highway 99, the Pemberton Meadows Road and the CN Rail right of way will play an important role in future trails planning.
20
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 114 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
3.0 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
3.1 Stakeholder Workshop
On April 24, 2008 a workshop was held with trail interests within Pemberton and Area C. The meeting had an informal format, allowing participants to freely discuss future trail development within the region. The workshop first identified potential trail conflicts and opportunities, followed by important destinations, culturally significant areas and liability concerns. Key directions from this workshop are listed in Section 2.3.
The workshop included (and purposefully invited) an array of local trail interests including the School Parent, Advisory Committees, Pemberton Valley Trails Association, paragliders, and Jackrabbits/ Nordics together with the Lil’wat Nation, Village of Pemberton and the SLRD. The Farmers Institute, Pemberton Valley Dyking District, Pemberton Wildlife, Tourism Pemberton, Chamber of Commerce, Snowmobile Club, Off Road Rebels and riding (equestrian) were invited but were unable to attend. A notice was also placed in the local paper, which prompted several members of the public and property owners to attend and provide input.
3.2 Stakeholder Work Sessions
In mid January 2009, the draft Master Plan was referred to all the above-mentioned stakeholders as well as any other interests that had indicated being updated. Formal comments were received from the SLRD, the Village of Pemberton, the PVTA and the Farmer’s Institute.
3.3 Public Meeting
On February 17, 2009 an open house, working session and presentation considered the draft Master Plan. The meeting collected addition information from those in attendance (approximately 30-40) and an overview of the Master Plan together with a question and answer format. The comments collected include the following:
Trail Challenges
1. Achieving a Mt. Currie – Pemberton Connection 2. Securing rights of way (x3)
21
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 115 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
3. Achieving Horse-only trails 4. Secure usage of dike 5. Require physical deterrents for motorized vehicles, ATVs, motorcross, snowmobiles on trails, dikes and in riparian areas 6. Respect for private property 7. Access through reserve lands (Owl Ridge to Mount Currie to Lillooet Lake) 8. Retaining some wild areas trails, no hard surfaces, no signs 9. Fences on private property cutting off trails 10. Dogs wandering on farms 11. Garbage
Trail Opportunities
1. Roadside trail from Pemberton Meadows to Mt Curry enhances Slow Food Sunday, - access to local farms, provide safe transportation for all ages, assist with traffic for Pemberton Festival 2. No dog poops base all over Mosquito Trails 3. Bear proof garbage cans on trails along with recycling bins. 4. Hopefully cut down on garbage 5. Make Pemberton Meadows safe for bicycles up to forestry bridge 6. Dogs must be kept out of farmland – High priority
Favourite Pemberton Area Trails
1. Mosquito Lake and Area Trails (including Reid Road and Ivey Lake) 2. Valley Loop 3. Bathtub Trail 4. Overnight Sensation 5. River at Erickson Road 6. Black Tail 7. One Mile 8. Riverside 9. Lumpy’s 10. Owl Ridge (logging road, could be expanded to Friendship Trail) 11. Trails on south side of One Mile Lake to Wuschkes (horses) 12. Mackenzie Basin 13. Owl Ridge 14. Mackenzie Cruise 15. Smoke a Howie 16. Tour de Soo 17. Happy Trail 18. Nairn Falls 19. Riverlands (John’s Trail)
Preference for the development, improvement or expansion of Trails
1. Valley Loop 2. Valley Loop/Highway 99/Firendship Trail expand 3. Valley Loop, Friendship, One Mile 4. Highway trail from Pemberton Meadows to Mt Currie-Airport Road 5. Up to Mount Currie 6. Hurley turnoff –to Lillooet Lake continuity 7. Routes within Pemberton 8. Signal Hill more accessible for all, more up hill horses access loop + One Mile Lake 9. Mackenzie Cruise, Spetch Creek, Heart Lake (Mt. Saxifrage)
22
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 116 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
10. One Mile Trail Network Expansion + Development on Mackenize Trails 11. Bridge over One Mile 12. Trail connection one end of Pemberton Valley to the other (similar to Whistler’s Lost Lake trail with hill viewpoints , usage, horses, bikes walking, cross country skiing, etc (non-motorized)
Seasonal Use of Trails: Spring (24), Summer (21), Fall (22) and Winter (18)
Trail Use 1. General Recreation 2. Exercising Pets or Horses 3. Explore Nature 4. Access to other recreational destinations 5. Commuting to Work, School, etc 6. Sports Training or Competition 7. Thrill Seeking 8. Business Amenity 9. Hunting/Gathering 10. Spiritual Experience
Mode of Use 1. Foot 2. Bicycle 3. Horse 4. Snowshoe 5. Cross country skiing 6. Motor bike (Dirt Bike, Trials) 7. ATV 8. Skateboard 9. Scooter/Wheelchair 10. Cows?
Stakeholder Questions and Comments
1. Day to day activities need a hard surfaced trail, not necessarily paved 2. Nairn spelled wrong 3. Friendship Trail, status of construction along Hwy 99 4. Existing highway bridge does not accommodate horses 5. Plan should go as far as Miller’s and Helmer’s Farms 6. Accessibility 7. Designated downhill biker trails 8. Protocol, education on trails
23
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 117 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
4.0 MASTER PLAN DIRECTIONS
The Squamish Lillooet Regional District is committed to preparing a Master Plan that will guide the long-term management, infrastructure improvements and funding of trails in the future. This section of the Master Plan, together with Figure #3 provides definitive direction for a long term trails program for the area, highlighting existing and proposed trail locations, jurisdictional challenges and priorities.
4.1 Recommended Trail Locations
The alignment of future trails and connections were developed from comments received from local trail and government stakeholders. The consulting team also further informed theses recommendations by conducting on-site inspections of existing and prospective trail routings to determine appropriate locations for trail enhancements and connections, together with trail infrastructure and/or significant construction works.
The recommended trails routings consider the three categories being commuter / Valley Trails,, singletrack and Alpine access,. The description also identifies the recommended trail design (standards).
4.1.1 Commuter / Valley Trails
Valley Loop Routing- The Valley Loop Route is and is intended to continue as the main recreational trail within the Pemberton Valley. For the most part the Loop follows Crown land flood protection dykes that run adjacent to the south-west side of the Lillooet River and the north side of Pemberton Creek. The trail’s character and design responds to the dyke dimensions with a gravel surface width of approximately 3- 4 metres , permitting non-motorized users. This non-motorized, multi-use trail is not proposed to be paved at this time.
Lillooet River Bridge Alignment– A bridge connecting both sides of the Lillooet River is crucial to the local trail network. Preference was given to the end of Clover Road at the terminus of an existing right of way. Local equestrian groups indicated that the bridge must safely accommodate horses and their riders.
Highway 99 Routing - The trail is proposed immediately adjacent to Highway 99 providing a safe and direct route for commuters travelling from the intersection of Highway 99/Portage Road and Mount Currie. Initial funding has been secured from the Portage Road intersection up to the Lillooet River crossing.
A decision may be necessary in the future to determine whether the Highway 99 route would be the direct link from the Village and Sea to Sky Trail and the Friendship Trail (refer to trail routing D/) . It may be preferable in the future to route the Friendship Trail along Highway 99 east to Pemberton Farm Road East where it would join a routing that runs in close proximity to the CN Rail line.
24
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 118 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
There may, however, still be a need to expand the paved shoulder along Highway 99 to accommodate on-road cyclists and walkers. The trail would permit non-motorized users and be at a standard similar to the Valley Loop.
Friendship Trail Routing- In responding to the Winds of Change report, a preliminary alignment has been discussed with local trail interests for the establishment of a Friendship Trail. At this time the trail has the potential to travel either directly from downtown Pemberton (proposed Canal Trail) to Mount Currie and eventually to Owl Ridge and Reid Road. There is also an option to tie in the Highway 99 Commuter Trail at the southern extension of Pemberton Farm Road East(The Plateau). The proposed trail alignment travels through several private properties as well as Village and Crown owned lands.
The trail standards may differ given the location of the trail and the possible environmental or cultural considerations. In particular the trail from downtown Pemberton to the railway crossing at the Gravel Pit (The Plateau) may be a more natural single track standard, then as the Highway 99 Commuter trail joins it could be closer to the Valley Loop standard. The Friendship Trail would be a multi-use trail for non-motorized users. Eventually the trail may be lit and cleared for four season use. It is the only trail that was suggested for paving other than Village trails.
Canal Routing - This proposed trail along the Arn Canal provides an important off-road connection between the Benchlands and the Valley Loop, Mosquito Lake and Mackenzie Basin trails. The trail would need to travel through private and Crown lands (and at one point parallel the CN Rail right of way).
The trail would be at a reduced Valley Loop standard (suggest 2 metre trail width) and be multi-use for non-motorized users.
Village/Dyke Routing - In addition to the Valley Loop Trail, the Pemberton Creek Dyke also continues through to the Village of Pemberton. The dyke currently follows the north side of Pemberton Creek from the Pioneer Junction townhomes to Highway 99, then through the BCR/ Signal Hill Homes’ property, across the CN Rail right of way to the SLRD offices. There is also potential to link the existing hard surface trails that connect existing neighbourhoods to the Village Core. . It is understood that the dike trail’s character and design will continue to respond to the dyke dimensions with a gravel surface width of approximately 3- 4 metres, permitting non-motorized user, while the internal Village trails would be hard surface and 2-3 metres in width.
Rural Road Routing - Although the scope of the Master Plan was to focus on off-road trails, consideration has also been given to the potential of rural roads in enhancing or complementing the trail experience and/or commuting. The roads can be grouped in four clusters: Valley Loop to Fraser and Clover Roads; Pemberton Meadows Road through the Village; Mosquito Lake/Mackenzie Basin Forest Service Roads and Reid Road; and the Green River Forest Service Road.
25
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 119 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
The standards for improvements to the roads vary from an expanded and paved shoulder (Pemberton Meadow Road) to delineation shoulder painting and safety signage.
4.1.2 Singletrack Trails
West River Routing - The West River Route is a riparian trail that runs along the shore of the Lillooet River from Pemberton Farm Road West to water access point adjacent to Fraser Road PVTA connecting with Valley Loop. It is a singletrack trail that provides informal access and views of the river. Access is currently restricted in several areas as it crosses private property. A pedestrian (PVTA)bridge has been recommended from the access point at Pemberton Farm Road West to the north-west trailhead to access trails in the Mackenzie Basin area.
The trail would permit non-motorized users, primarily recreational walkers and mountain bikers. The trail standards should strive to conform with the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan (refer to Section 1.2.3).
As mentioned, the more northerly portion of the trail is part of the Lillooet River dyke protection works. It is recommended that this trail be designed to a lesser standard , consistent with singletrack design (refer to the Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan).
Waterfall Trail - The Pemberton Creek Waterfall Trail is a quick and attractive hike that is readily accessible from the Village core. A more difficult mountain bike trail spurs off the main route. The trail is entirely on Crown land, and provides easy access from the Benchlands area.
The trail would permit non-motorized users, primarily recreational walkers and mountain bikers (spur). The trail standards should strive to conform with the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan for singletrack routes.
Tour de Soo Route - This trail routing follows a former logging road from the Village core south towards Nairn Falls Provincial Park, Soo Valley and Whistler. This route will be the gateway of Pemberton via the Sea to Sky Trail. At this time the alignment skirts private property along the east side (Creekside Townhomes), and continues on Crown land.
The trail is currently unimproved and would benefit from annual upkeep. Major upgrades and standards should await directions from the Sea to Sky Trail work program. Further connections to One Mile Lake Trails and Nairn Falls should be enhanced.
The more technical singletrack trail above has extensive technical terrain features that are designed for the expert rider only. The design standards of such trails should follow the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan.
One Mile Lake Area - The One Mile Lake trails are part of the Village of Pemberton Park on Crown lands, undesignated Crown Land and privately
26
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 120 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
held lands. There are currently several scenic and often rugged singletrack trails surrounding the lake. The trails would continue to permit non-motorized users, primarily recreational walkers and mountain bikers. The trail standards should strive to conform with the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan. It is a goal that the Lake Loop provide universal accessibility, while the new route to Nairn Falls (parallel Highway 99) be similar to the Valley Loop standard.
The One Mile Lake trails should also enhance the connections to Nairn Falls and the Tour de Soo routes.
Nairn Falls Area - These trails connect to the One Mile Lake network, and are on provincial park lands. The Village has no jurisdiction over these trails, although it is important that they continue to be integrated into the area’s trail system, notably One Mile Lake and Tour de Soo.
Golf Course Area - An equestrian trail currently runs south from the Pemberton Creek/Lillooet River confluence to the Green River crossing. It is then proposed that this follow the River downstream to the Lillooet River adjacent to the Meadows Golf Course and the Pemberton Airport. The golf course lands are owned by the Village and currently leased to operators (the front nine holes were a Free Crown Grant with a reverter clause if not used as a public golf course, while the back nine holes were purchased at market value with use restricted to a public golf course). The airport lands are owned by the Village, for aeronautical purposes. The area may contain culturally significant features from earlier First Nations settlement and/or activities. Any future trail construction, however, must seriously consider archaeology investigations, as well as the potential safety conflicts with the existing golf and expanding aviation uses. The SLRD will consult with Lil’wat Nation on any proposals adjacent to First Nations archaeological features in this area.
The golf course trails should continue as singletrack trails in accordance with the Corridor standards. Given the limited amount of designated horseback riding trails (and the fact that the existing trails were constructed by the Adventure Ranch), it is recommended that these trails give preference to equestrian users.
Bird Walk Routing - This trail, northwest of the Village, is a route situated on Crown land that meanders along an old river channel with high biodiversity values that the MOE has established as a wildlife management area. The trail is on Crown land whereby access is provided from Pemberton Meadows Road (out and back route). This passive trail would benefit from trailhead improvements (signage and parking) and, if possible, access from Erickson Road. This trail should be have limited improvements to ensure the environmental integrity of the route.
Mosquito Lake Area- The Mosquito Lake area has the highest and most renowned collection of mountain bike trails in the Pemberton area. The majority of these lands, however, have been identified by the provincial government to be transferred to private interests (Lil’wat Nation). It is
27
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 121 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
recommended that the focus of this area will consider the preservation of “icon” trails that can co-exist with future development plans.
MacKenzie Basin Area- The MacKenzie Basin area is a gateway to backcountry trail experiences for the Pemberton area. Although traditionally an area for equestrian and hunting use, during the past decade there has been an explosion of mountain biking trails and descents. The trails are almost all located on Crown land. The trail standards and management regime for this area is recognized in the Corridor Recreational Management Plan.
4.1.3 Alpine Access
Miller Creek Route – There is potential for a trail that follows a former road grade (Village to Miller Creek), now used periodically as an equestrian trail. The trail passes through both private and Crown lands in the Miller Creek watershed. Access is currently limited to a gate at the most easterly entrance.
Mount Currie Routing – There was a stated need to provide alpine hiking access to the peaks of Mount Currie. Potential routing may be possible from the Green River Forest Service Road.
The trail would permit non-motorized users, primarily recreational walkers and mountain bikers. The trail standards should conform with the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan for singletrack routes.
Figure #3 identifies and categorizes the proposed trail network. In addition, the following table provided outlines each the trail type, existing tenure as well as the status of the route:
28
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 122 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Trail Type Current Tenure Status** Reference The following numbers correspond with Figure 3 Valley Bottom Bottom Valley Rural Road Commuter Local Front Country Backcountry
VALLEY LOOP ROUTE A 1-2 * Crown Right of Way EI A 2-3 (50) * Crown Right of Way EI A 3-4 (50) * Village of Pemberton (Fraser Road ROW) EU A 4-5 (50) * Village of Pemberton (Clover Road ROW) EU A 8 – D 5 Proposed Crossing of Lillooet Crown Land) P A 4-8 * Crown Right of Way (Crown/PVDD P application for tenure in process) A 5-6 (50) * Private Property EU A 7-8 * Private Property EI A 6/7-9 (50) * Crown Right of Way also Riverside Trail EI A 9-10 (50) * Highway Crossing and Crown Right of Way P (need discussion on the highway crossing, can the trail go under the bridge (except during high flooding?). Need highways permit. A 10-11(50) * Crown Land EI A 11-12 (50) * Crown Land EI A 12-13 (50) * Crown Land Right of Way EI A 13-14 (50) * Crown Land Right of Way EI A 14-15 (50) * Crown Land Right of Way EI A 15-1 (50) * Village of Pemberton (Urdal Road) EU HWY 99 COMMUTE B 1-2 (53) * Private Property P B 2-3 * Crown and Private Lands P B 3-4 * Private Property P B 4-5 * Private Property P WEST RIVER ROUTES Q 41 – C1 * Crown (Lillooet River) Land P C 1-2 * Private Property EU C 2-3 * Private Property EU C 3-4 (51) * Private Property EU C 4-5 * Private Property EU C 5-6 * Private Property EU C7 * Proposed Bridge Connector P
29
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 123 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Reference The following Trail Type Current Tenure Existing numbers Improved correspond with (EI), Figure 3 Existing Unimprov ed (EU) or Proposed
Valley Bottom Rural Road Commuter Local Front Country Backcountry (P) FRIENDSHIP ROUTES D 1-2 * Private Property (CN Rail) P D 2-3 * Private Property (CN Rail) P D 3-4 * Crown Land EI D 4-5 * Crown Land EU D-5-6 * Crown Land/Private Property P (Rail Crossing) D 6-7 * Private Property (Rail Crossing EU D 7-8 * Private Property EU D 8-9 * Private Property EU D 9-10 * Private Property EU D 10-11 * Private Property P D 11-12 * Private Property P D 12-B 5 * Private Property P D 13-14 * Crown Land/Private Property P D 13-15 * Crown Land P K 10-D 1 * Village/Provincial Road ROW EU EAST RIVER ROUTES E 1-2 *Crown EU E 2-3 * Private Property EU E 3-4 * Private Property P E 4-5 * Private Property/Reserve Lands P E 5-6 Private P CANAL ROUTES F 1-2 * Crown Land/Park P F 2-3 * Private Property P F 3-4 * Private Property P F 3- I 9 * * Private Property/Village of P Pemberton MILLER CREEK ROUTES G 1-2 * Crown Land and Private EU Property G 2-3 * Crown Land Private Property EU WATERFALL ROUTE H 1-2 *EI E2-D18 Crown …Proposed D17-D18 Crown…proposed D16-D18 OMIT
30
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 124 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Trail Type Current Tenure Status** Reference The following numbers correspond with
Figure 3 Valley Rural Road Commuter Local Front Backcountr RURAL ROADS I1-2 * Provincial ROW EU I2-6 * Provincial ROW EU I2-5 * Provincial ROW EU I3-4 * Provincial ROW EU I5-F1 * Provincial ROW EI F1–I7 * Village ROW EI I7-9 * Village ROW EI I9-10 * Village ROW EI I11-12 * Provincial ROW EU I12-13 * Forest Service Road EU I13-15 * Forest Service Road EU I15-16 * Forest Service Road EU I15-17 * Provincial ROW EU B3-I18 * Provincial ROW EU I18-19 * Provincial ROW/Forest Service EU Road I19-20 * Forest Service Road EU TOUR DE SOO ROUTE J 1-2 Crown and Private Property EI J 2-3 Crown EI J 3-4 Crown EI J 4-5 Crown EU J 6 Crown and Private Property EI VILLAGE/DYKE ROUTE A 13 – K 1 (52) * Private Property /Crown Land EI K 1-2 (52) * Private Property/Crown Land EI K 2-3 (53) * Private Property / Crown Land EU K 3-4 * Private Property /CN Rail/Crown EU Land K 5-6 Sidewalk Village of Pemberton EI K 7-8 * Dedicated Trail U/C EI K 8-9 * Dedicated Trail EI K 8-10 * Dedicated Trail EI K 10-12 *BC Hydro ROWEI K 7-11 Sidewalk Village of Pemberton EI K3-13 * CN Rail/Crown Land/Private EU Property
31
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 125 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Reference Trail Type The following Current Tenure Status** numbers correspond with Figure 3 Valley Rural Road Commuter Local Front Backcountr ONE MILE LAKE L 57 Village Park/ Crown Land EI L 58 Crown Land/BC Parks EI L 59 Crown Land/BC Parks EI L 60 Crown Land EI L 61 Crown Land EI L 62 Crown Land EI NAIRN FALLS M 61 Crown Land EI Nairn Falls Trail BC Parks EI GOLF COURSE TRAILS N 1-2 *Crown EI N 3 -4 * Private Property /ROW EI N 4-5 * Private Property P N 5-6 * Private Property /Crown Land EU N 7-8 * Forest Service Road RIVER FLATS O * Crown Land EU MOSQUITO LAKE P 1 * Private Property # EI P 2 * Private Property # EI P 3 * Private Property # EI P 4 * Private Property # EI P 5 (New Red * Private Property # EI Rock) P 6 * Private Property # EI P 7 * Private Property # EI P 8 * Private Property # EI P 9 * Private Property # EI P 10 * Private Property # EI P 11 * Private Property # EI P 12 * Private Property # EI P 13 * Private Property # EI P 14 * Private Property # EI P15 * Private Property # EI P 16 * Private Property # EI
# Land Transfer from the Crown to the Lil’wat Nation for development purposes
32
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 126 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Reference Trail Type Current Tenure The following Status** numbers correspond with Figure 3 Valley Rural Road Commuter Local Front Backcountr
MOSQUITO LAKE P 17 * Private Property # EI P 18 * Private Property # EI P 19 * Private Property # EI P 20 * Private Property # EI P21a * Private Property # EI P 21 * Private Property # EI P 22 * Private Property # EI P 23 * Private Property # EI P 24 * Private Property # EI P 25 * Private Property # EI P 26 * Private Property # EI P 27 * Private Property # EI P 28 * Private Property # EI P 29 * Private Property # EI MACKENZIE BASIN Q 30 * Crown Land EI Q 31 * Crown Land EI Q 32 * Crown Land EI Q 33 * Crown Land EI Q 34 * Crown Land EI Q 35 * Crown Land EI Q 36 * Crown Land EI Q 37 * Crown Land EI Q 37a * Crown Land EI/P Q 38 * Crown Land EI Q 39 * Crown Land EI Q 40 * Crown Land EI Q 41 * Crown Land EI Q 42 * Crown Land EI Q 42 a * Crown Land EI Q 43 * Crown Land EI Q 44 * Crown Land EI Q 45 * Crown Land EI Q 46 * Crown Land EI Q 47 * Crown Land EI Q 48 * Crown Land EI Q 49 * Crown Land EI
33
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 127 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
**Existing Improved (EI), Existing Unimproved (EU) or Proposed (P)
The Pemberton and Area C Trail Service Area Master Plan indicates a potential to provide the community with an extensive and networked trail system or various types and locations. For the most part most of the trails exist, however, require certain connections or additions to provide for the desired routes. The subsequent section provides a detailed consideration of each trail segment, identifying the many challenges that must be addressed to achieve long term tenure of the trails.
4.2 Trail Development Challenges
Section 2.3 identifies the Pemberton Valley’s many land use and jurisdictional considerations specifically related to trail development. The chart below cross- references each of the proposed trail segments with the nine (9) previously described challenges. The following subsection then specifically outlines specific protocols necessary to achieve the desired trail connections related to:
Potential Challenges
Reference The following numbers correspond with
Figure 3 ical Site g Trail Use Improvements Sensitive Areas Sensitive Use/User Conflicts Agriculture Land Use Land Agriculture or Archeolo Natural Hazards (steep Use of Roadway and/or Significant Infrastructure Infrastructure Significant slopes, flooding, erosion) equestrian, and walking) and equestrian, New Urban Development (motorized , mechanized, , mechanized, (motorized Road or Railway Crossing Requires Secured Tenure for Significant Cultural Historical Significant Cultural Historical Recognized Environmentally Environmentally Recognized
VALLEY LOOP ROUTE A 1-2 **Crown A 2-3 (50) * *Crown A 3-4 (50) * * A 4-5 (50) * A 8 – D 5 * *Crown *bridge A 4-8 * *Private *grazing *fencing A 5-6 (50) * *Private *grazing *fencing A 7-8 * *Private *grazing *fencing A 6/7-9 (50) * *Crown *grazing *fencing A 9-10 (50) * *Crown *equestrian *Bridge underpass
34
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 128 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Potential Challenges
Reference The following numbers correspond with Figure 3 walking) walking) Significant New Urban Historical or (motorized , (motorized Infrastructure Infrastructure mechanized, mechanized, Improvements equestrian, and and equestrian, Natural Hazards and/or Road or Use of Roadway Railway Crossing Recognized ESAs Recognized Requires Secured Secured Requires Use/User Conflicts Tenure for Trail Use Trail for Tenure Significant Cultural Agriculture Land Use Land Agriculture
A 10-11(50) * *Crown * *equestrian *fencing flood A 11-12 (50) * *Crown *grazing *fencing A 12-13 (50) * *Crown *grazing *fencing A 13-14 (50) *highway crossing A 14-15 (50) A 15-1 (50) * * HWY 99 COMMUTE B 1-2 (53) * *Private *agriculture B 2-3 **Crown * agriculture B 3-4 * *Private * *bridge * agriculture B 4-5 **Private * agriculture WEST RIVER ROUTES Q41 - C1 *Crown/ *Bridge Private C 1-2 **Private* flood C 2-3 * *Private * flood C 3-4 (51) **Private* flood C 4-5 * *Private * flood C 5-6 **Private* flood C 4-D 3 **Private* *Bridge flood FRIENDSHIP ROUTES D 1-2 (51) **Private D 2-3 **Crown* D 3-4 **Crown* * flood D 4-5 *Crown/ * * Private flood D-5-6 **Private** *RR X flood D 6-7 * *Private/ * *RR X Crown D 7-8 *Private * D 8-9 * *Private *
35
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 129 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Reference Potential Challenges
The following numbers g ical
correspond with g Figure 3 Crossin y for Trail Use Trail for Improvements Natural Hazards Recognized ESAs Recognized Significant Cultural New Development Development New User Group Conflicts Agriculture Land Use Land Agriculture Use of Roadway and/or Significant Infrastructure Infrastructure Significant Requires Secured Tenure Tenure Secured Requires equestrian, and walking) and equestrian, (motorized , mechanized, , mechanized, (motorized Road or Railwa or Road Historical or Archeolo Historical
FRIENDSHIP ROUTES D 9-10 **Private * D 10-11 *Private * *RR X D 11-12 *Private D 12-B 5 *Private EAST RIVER ROUTES E 1-2 **Private E 2-3 **Private E 3-4 * *Private * * flood E 4-5 **Private*** flood E 5-6 * *Private * * flood CANAL ROUTES F 1-2 **Crown** flood F 2-3 * *Private * * * flood F 3-4 **Private** flood MILLER CREEK ROUTES G 1-2 * *Private/ Crown G 2-3 * *Private/ Crown WATERFALL ROUTE H 1-2(56) *Crown TOUR DE SOO ROUTE J 1-2 (63) *Private/ Crown J 2-3 (63) *Crown J 3-4 (63) *Crown J 4-5 (63) *Crown
36
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 130 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN Reference Potential Challenges The following numbers correspond with ical
Figure 3 g Improvements Use of Roadway and/or Significant Infrastructure Infrastructure Significant Road or Railway Crossing Crossing or Railway Road Agriculture Land Use Land Agriculture Cultural Significant or Archeolo Historical Tenure Secured Requires Use Trail for ESAs Recognized Natural Hazards Development New recreational (commercial, or residential) Use/User Group Conflicts
VILLAGE/DYKE ROUTE A 13 – K 1 (52) * Crown K 1-2 (52) * Crown K 2-3 (53) * * Crown K 3-4 *Private * K 5-6iv *Private K 7-8 K 8-9 K 8-10 K10-12 *Private K 7-11 K 3-12 *Private * *Rwy X ONE MILE LAKE L 57 * * *flood L 58 * *Private * erosion L 59 * * erosion L 60 * * erosion L 61 * * erosion L 62 * * erosion NAIRN FALLS M 61 * * erosion Nairn Falls Trail * * GOLF COURSE TRAILS N 1-2 *Crown N 3 -4 *Private * equestrian / golf N 4-5 *Private *flood *golf N 5-6 *Private *flood *golf N 7-8 * *Crown *traffic
37
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 131 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Reference Potential Challenges The following numbers correspond with Figure 3
g Crossin y ical Site g Improvements Use of Roadway and/or Significant Infrastructure Infrastructure Significant Road or Railwa or Road commercial, recreational or or recreational commercial, Agriculture Land Use Land Agriculture Significant Cultural Historical or Archeolo for Tenure Secured Requires Trail Use ESAs Recognized Natural Hazards Development New ( User Group Conflicts , mechanized, (motorized walking) and equestrian,
RIVER FLATS O * * * * flood Crown MOSQUITO LAKE P 1 * *Private * * shuttlers P 2 * *Private * P 3 * *Private * P 4 * *Private * * shuttlers P 5 * *Private * P 6 * *Private * P 7 * *Private * * shuttlers P 8 * *Private * P 9 * *Private * P 10 * *Private * P 11 * *Private * P 12 * * MOSQUITO LAKE P 13 * *Private * P 14 **Private * P 15 **Private * P 16 **Private * P 17 **Private * P 18 **Private * * mtb shuttlers P 19 **Private * P 20 **Private * P21a **Private * P 21 **Private * P 22 **Private * P 23 **Private * P 24 **Private * P 25 **Private * P 26 **Private * P 27 **Private * P 28 **Private * **Private * P 29 38
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 132 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Reference Potential Challenges The following numbers correspond with
Figure 3 g ical Site Crossin g y Use walking) walking) Improvements Natural Hazards Recognized ESAs Recognized Archeolo New Development Development New or Railwa Agriculture Land Use Land Agriculture Significant Infrastructure Infrastructure Significant commercial, recreational or or recreational commercial, ( Use of Roadway and/or Road Significant Cultural Historical orSignificant Cultural Historical , mechanized, equestrian, and and equestrian, , mechanized, User Group Conflicts (motorized Requires Secured Tenure for Trail Trail for Tenure Secured Requires
MACKENZIE BASIN Q 30 *Crown Q 31 *Crown Q 32 *Crown Q 33 * *Crown Q 34 *Crown * * mtb shuttlers hunting Q 35 *Crown Q 36 *Crown * mtb shuttlers hunting Q 37 *Crown Q 37a *Crown Q 38 *Crown Q 39 *Crown Q 40 *Crown Q 41 *Crown Q 42 *Crown Q 42 a *Crown * * mtb shuttlers hunting Q 43 *Crown Q 44 *Crown Q 45 *Crown Q 46 *Crown Q 47 *Crown Q 48 *Crown Q 49 *Crown
4.3 Trail Approval Protocols
Section 4.2 identified the many challenges with the corresponding trails that need to be addressed in the fulfillment of an integrated trail network in the Pemberton Area. This section provides additional direction on the
39
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 133 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
appropriate approach in addressing the recognized issues including agricultural land use, significant cultural, historical and archeological sites, recognized environmentally sensitive areas, natural hazards, new development, user group conflicts, significant infrastructure improvements and the use of road/railway rights of way or crossings.
4.3.1 Agricultural Lands
The concern between public access to trails and the protection of agricultural activities has been an ongoing issue in the Pemberton Valley for many years. The specific concerns are primarily focused on the use of the Crown land dyke along the valley watercourses and the adjacent farm uses. During the past five (5) years there have been ongoing discussions among the farmers, trail interests, the Regional District, the provincial government and the Agricultural Land Commission.
For future trail approvals it is recommended that the Regional District continue draw from their existing protocol, and continually referring to the provincial government’s report A Guide to Using and Developing Trails in Farm and Ranch Areas that have informed the following suggested best practices for the approval, design and ongoing management of trails within or adjacent to agricultural areas:
Consultation Initial and ongoing consultation with affected farmers on the proposed trail. limit the impact of trail users on farm operations through mitigation efforts rather than closing trails.
Design Provide a physical barrier and or natural separation between the agricultural use and the trail through landscaping, ditches or fencing – these must limit access of domestic animals (dogs). Install signs that provide important information about trail use in agricultural areas such as a code of conduct, possibility of trail closures, notice about rural traffic and safety considerations (in relation to farming activities and practices), advertise local agriculture offerings and mark agricultural heritage and historic points of interest.
Management Establish enforcement and maintenance programs for the trail use.
4.3.2 Significant Cultural Historical or Archeological Site
Existing and proposed trails within the Pemberton area come close to several culturally or historically significant sites. Future trail and route planning should include these important destinations and/or historical signage. This is also a provincial requirement through existing agreements and protocols.
4.3.3 Requires Secured Tenure for Trail Use
40
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 134 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
For the most part, Pemberton and Area C’s existing and proposed trail system has not secured authorized tenure from the public or private landowners. Therefore, a top priority with the implementation of the Master Plan is to ensure long-term rights for use of the desired trail routings. Section 4.1 of this Master Plan provides the status of trails located on Crown land, private property, BC Parks and Village owned lands, while the subsections provide a recommended course of action to ensure that the Pemberton and Area C Trail Master Plan can be achieved in the long term:
Net Gain Trails – The Management Plan recommended that affected municipalities adopt a Net Gain of Trails Policy. This policy is attached as Appendix B and should be incorporated into the SLRD (Area C) and Village of Pemberton Official Community Plans. The net gain policy will ensure that existing trails will be preserved.
Mutual Agreement – Property owners may recognize the valley of the proposed trail system and may volunteer permission for a right of way. In accordance with the Corridor Recreation Trail Management Plan, the land owner shall be absolved of any liability as well not responsible for maintenance, inspections or improvements.
Dedicated Right of Way – Property owners requesting approval from the local jurisdiction may be asked to dedicate a trail right of way that is identified in the right of way. This is typically part of the development proposal and usually is integrated into the design of the project. If the lands are not dedicated but rather the land owner continues to own the property, the SLRD shall absolve the owner of any liability and maintenance, inspections or improvements requirements.
Crown Land – Many of the trails within the Pemberton area are located on Crown owned land. Crown owned land includes land that may or may not be allocated through assigned tenures for resource, agriculture or grazing uses, and flood protection works (dykes).
It is recommended that trails on Crown land be established under Section 65 of the Forest and Range Practices Act (unless already part of a provincial park). Trails are deemed “established” by an order of the Minister under s. 56 of the Forest and Range Practices Act. The trails are typically mapped for public awareness and managed through agreements with a local recreational organization (in this case the SLRD). Section 1.3 of the Corridor Recreational Trail Master Plan outlines the process for achieving authorization of Crown lands for trail purposes. It should be recognized that certain existing uses of Crown land will require the referral of the tenure applications to specific provincial ministries including:
Resource Uses require that established trails must receive consideration in resource planning, yet the establishment of a trail does not guarantee
41
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 135 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
conservation in the same sense as a park or protected area and further shall not intended to unduly impact industrial uses. The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts can enact legal management objectives for “established” trails.
Flood Control – In accordance with Section 2(4) of the Dike Maintenance Act (DMA) a person or a diking authority must not make changes to a dike, or to the area adjacent to a dike without the prior written approval of the Inspector of Dikes (or a Deputy Inspector) where these changes include:
• changes or alterations to the cross section or crest elevation of a dike; • installation of culverts, pipes, flood-boxes, utility lines, pump stations, or any structure through, on or over a dike; • construction of any works on or over a dike right of way, including structures, excavations and placement of fill or other materials; • alteration of the foreshore or stream channel where the works could increase flood levels or impact the integrity of a dike such as dredging, construction of erosion protection works, bridges and other in-stream works; and • construction of a new dike.
When making an application for a DMA Approval an Application Form must be completed and submitted to the appropriate Deputy Inspectors of Dikes Offices and the local Diking Authority. The PVDD is happy to work with and provide advice to stakeholders in regards to trail projects involving the diking network. The PVDD should be contacted anytime there is a proposed trail development on or adjacent to a dike. The PVDD will require detailed information pertaining to the proposed development. This should include a description, including timelines, of proposed trail construction activities, a location map and a sketch plan. Please be aware that certain trail development activities, such as access ramps, may require Ministry of Environment, DMA approvals. The following information, found at http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/public_safety/flood/structural.html, outlines the regulations when working on and around a dike:
Private Property – It should be recognized that the Master Plan does not, for the most part, identify definitive trail alignments but rather general directions for trails to travel and connect. The public meetings indicated concern that private property could be taken from private property owners without consultation, agreements or if required compensation.
Historically trails within the Pemberton Valley are located for considerable to small distances on private property. For properties that will potentially develop the SLRD can require an easement or right of way through the statutory approval process. Where trails travel through private held lands that likely will not develop, the SLRD will need to establish a procedure for agreements to appropriately address property impacts and concerns relating
42
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 136 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
to: risk and liability; limiting any trespassing or disruption on the remainder of the property; ongoing maintenance; and potential for seasonal or permanent closures.
BC Parks – This stewardship branch of the Ministry of the Environment manages and maintains the trails within Nairn Falls Provincial Park with the following trails-related mandate: permit non-motorized recreation including hiking, biking and equestrian. not impact conservation goals of the area. focus enhancements on acceptable existing uses, rather than expansion. Utilize best practices for trail development
4.3.4 Recognized Environmentally Sensitive Areas
The SLRD has identified significant environmentally sensitive areas within the Area C OCP. In particular areas of interest in the area include deer winter range, goat winter range, spotted owl resource management zone and critical movement corridors. Existing and future trail development should be referred to SLRD staff to ensure consistency with the OCP environmental protection directions particularly related to recognized development shall:
preserve, protect, restore or enhance watercourses or other specified natural features of the environment; and comply with the Land Development Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Habitat, published by Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the Ministry of Environment, Land and Parks, May, 1992. access to rare, threatened or culturally important plant and animal species is discouraged; and, encourage the provision of information on the sensitivity of specific areas and appropriate user conduct; and Not compromise wildlife movement between key habitat areas.
4.3.5 Natural Hazards (steep slopes, flooding, erosion)
The existing natural hazards that may concern existing of future trail development include terrain stability hazards and flood hazard. The consideration of new or the improvement of existing trails shall be discouraged in areas with terrain instability (due to danger and the potential costs to stabilize the slope) and further that certain trails travelling through areas with potential flooding may be subject to temporary closures.
4.3.6 New Urban Development
There are several existing and proposed trail routes that have the potential to continue through properties subject to new development proposals. As a condition of approval, new trail connections shall be installed by the proponent (to service both the new subdivision and surrounding areas). These
43
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 137 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
developments (and therefore the trail alignment) will be subject to the statutorily required public review process and require a secured public right of way.
4.3.7 User Conflicts (motorized, mechanized, equestrian, and walking)
In the preparation of the Master Plan the public consultation identified a few concerns related to recognized trail user conflicts. First, there was a concern with trail users and farm uses such as risk of fire and the impact of dogs on agricultural operations. Secondly, there was a concern with downhill mountain bikers and hikers/equestrian activities. This was highlighted specifically in the MacKenzie Basin/Mosquito Lake area primarily in the spring (before the Whistler/Blackcomb Mountain Bike Park opens) whereby there is an increased incidence of shuttling downhill mountain bikers that may compromise the experience of other users.
Trails located on dikes should also not compromise flood protection works and maintenance.
Section 2.2.3 of the Corridor Management Plan provides clear directions for the SLRD to minimized potential conflicts as well as a dispute resolution approach in the management of the trail infrastructure.
4.3.8 Significant Infrastructure Improvements
There are portions of the existing and proposed trail alignments that may need significant infrastructure investment, particularly:
Extensive fencing to separate agricultural and trail uses; Bridges to cross the Lillooet River; and Underpasses, overpasses CN rail lines.
In accordance with the funding directions highlighted within Section 2.2.4 of the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan, the SLRD and the Village should identify specific partnerships within or outside the community to assist in paying for these necessary but expensive infrastructure improvements.
4.3.9 Use of Roadway and/or Road or Railway Crossings
Road - The province maintains roads outside the Village limits. The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure will require submission and approval of a Provincial Public Highway Permit or any anticipated improvements or crossings. The type of work or anticipated access, structures or special events must be identified with their specific location and detailed specifications. The Village of Pemberton maintains all non-arterial roads within its boundaries, except for Highway 99, which is a provincial highway, Portage Road and Pemberton Meadows Road
Railway Crossing - Specifically, Canadian National Railway has significant rights of way cutting through the valley bottom and in many instance trails are illegally intersecting with the rail line. At this time the only legal crossings are where a public road (i.e. Pemberton Farm Road
44
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 138 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
East) transects the rail line. In discussions with CN Rail the process to achieve legal crossings shall be required to submit the following details to CN Rail’s Crossings Division (BCR Territory): Formal written request for consideration of a legalized crossing; Location, timing, status (permanent/temporary) of crossing; site plan; site profile; and specific engineering considerations such as view lines, and layout.
CN Rail has indicated that any level crossing is discouraged unless it results in no net gain of crossings (in a centralized location). Preference is given to grade separation. Figure #3 indicates current and proposed rail crossings.
4.5 Trail Standards
The Corridor Management Plan adopts specific trail standards for construction and ratings in the Sea to Sky area. In addition to the individual trail standards identified within the Management Plan, the Master Plan must also include the following:
* Hard surface trails accessing the downtown from surrounding neighbourhoods * Trails standards must comply with diking design requirements * Winter plowing should be provided on the hard surface trails providing access to downtown * Lighting should be considered for commuter and hard surface trails. * Hard surface trails should provide opportunities for universal access, notably those accessing downtown and the One Mile Lake loop. * Trail design should consult with emergency service administrators to maximize access opportunities. * Future consideration should be given to trail head enhancements as considered in the Management Plan.
4.6 Governance
The Master Plan identifies the various government and non-government trail interests within the Pemberton Area. To effectively and efficiently implement the Plan’s actions, it is vital that the respective roles and responsibilities of each of the organizations be clearly documented. The following recognizes the various interests and identifies their mandates to assist in implementing the Master Plan, while the Action Plan more definitively identifies their participation:
45
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 139 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Government:
Squamish Lillooet Regional District – The Regional District shares with the provincial government, the management of trails located on Crown land within the Sea to Sky Corridor (including Pemberton and Area C). This responsibility is reinforced through the Sea to Sky Recreational Trail Service Establishment Bylaw No. 1006, 2007 (responsibility for the management and maintenance of the trails) and Pemberton Valley Recreational Trails Service Bylaw 1035,2006 (established a service area for the purpose of providing a recreational trails service).
Therefore, it should be recognized that locally, the SLRD has the management responsibility of the area trails and is the manger and administrator of the Master Plan.
In addition the SLRD will work on a day-to-day basis to implement the directions of the Master Plan, particular to the net gain of trails policy recommended in the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan for trail rights of way on private lands. The SLRD will also ensure that the trails map contained within the Area C Official Community Plan is consistent with the Master Plan routings.
Province of British Columbia (Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts) The implementation of the Master Plan on Crown lands must be consistent with provincial legislation, policies and agreements (such as the Sea to Sky LRMP, the Lil’wat Nation Land Use Agreement, and the Forests and Range Practices Act). The Provincial Trails Strategy prioritizing the use of Crown land for recreational activities, while the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and the Arts is a partner and a resource in the implementation of the Master Plan. Any trails on Crown land to be recognized by the province need to be authorized or established (refer to Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan for specific criteria, processes and requirements).
Village of Pemberton – The Village of Pemberton has participated in the development of the Master Plan. The Village will continue to participate in any initiatives that affect the Village’s trail interests, whether it be the acquisition of funding, rights of way, or trail amenities. The Village will will also implement the directions of the Master Plan, particular to the net gain of trails policy recommended in the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan for trail rights of way on private lands. The SLRD will also ensure that the trails map contained within the Village’s Official Community Plan is consistent with the Master Plan routings.
46
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 140 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan 2009 Pemberton Valley Dyking District – The PVDD is required to maintain the safety and integrity of dikes and to prevent detrimental effects on other parties and river processes in accordance with the Dike Maintenance Act. Therefore any trail development or improvements proposed along or immediately adjacent to the dikes, the District shall be consulted.
PVDD would have input through Lil’wat Nation – The Lil’wat the Steering Committee referrals Nation’s Land Use Planning Agreement with the Province presents preferred management approaches for their Territory. The implementation of the Master Plan should therefore uphold the requirements relating to trails planning and development within the traditional Lil’wat Territory particular the establishment of the Nt’akmen Areas and support for a Collaborative Management Agreement related to the protection of the Lil’wat A7x7ulmecw (Spirited Ground) Areas.
Trail User Groups:
Trail user community organizations are direct users of the local trail system, and specifically include: Pemberton Valley Trails Association, Pemberton Nordics, paragliders, Pemberton Wildlife, Pemberton Snowmobile Club, Off Road Rebels and Pemberton equestrian interests.
These groups should continue to be directly engaged in the ongoing implementation of the Master Plan, particular to consulting on finalized routings, improvements, signage, construction and user conflict management. Further those trail users groups that are registered not for profit organizations may also pursue funding for the enhancement of the trail system.
Community Interest Groups
The implementation of the Master Plan must also respect other community interests that are affected by trails. This may include positive association such as Parents Advisory Committees (elementary and high schools), Tourism Pemberton, Chamber of Commerce Pemberton Seniors (55+) and concerned groups such as the Farmers Institute. These groups shall be consulted to ensure that the Master Plan is receptive to their reasonable requests.
47
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 141 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Private Property Owners
The successful implementation of the Trail Master Plan must ensure that private property owner’s are proactively engaged. Many of the high priority trail routings must cross private lands. The Master Plan therefore must not only identify preferred alignments but also effectively mitigate reasonable conflicts, that includes enforcement.
48
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 142 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
5.0 ACTION PLAN
The Master Plan provides a blueprint for the implementation of preferred trail planning directions. The Master Plan, however, is not a standalone document but rather must be in accordance or in sync with other local, regional, provincial and territorial legislation, policies and agreements relating to trails and adjacent land use. The Master Plan must also engage and respect the array of land use and community interests that are affected by trail activities. The implementation of the Master Plan has recognized and balanced these considerations in accordance with directions relating to management, partnerships, rights of way, funding, construction, maintenance and communications.
Further, many of the trail related recommendations are already contained within the overarching Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan which sets down certain requirements and directions for trails situated on the area’s Crown land. In particular, the Management Plan identifies the following: * Corridor-wide trail ratings, standards, classifications, signage and markers; * Trail maintenance and improvement priorities, connections and expansion areas (through a photographic documentation of each trail); * Requirements for trail management agreements, * Roles and responsibilities of trails by senior, regional and local governments; * A Communications Plan; * First Nations engagement commitments; * A Risk Management Plan; and * A Fundraising Plan.
This section provides an overview of the preferred direction, together with corresponding recommendations. A table is also provides more detail with regard to the lead agency, partners, funding sources and timelines required for the each recommendation’s implementation. The Master Plan should be a dynamic plan, continually being updated to reflect community priorities and completed projects.
5.1 Administration of the Trails Master Plan
Section 4.6 provides an overview of the governance structure of trails within Pemberton and Area C, recognizing that the SLRD is the lead agency. In particular, the SLRD is responsible for the management and administration of the area’s trail system, specifically by the Open Spaces/Trails Technician. It should be recognized, that in addition to this Master Plan, the SLRD is responsible for the action items contained within the Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan as they related to the Pemberton area.
Recommendation #1:
THAT with the adoption of the Pemberton and Area C Master Plan, the SLRD commits to being the lead and coordinating organization responsible for the implementation of the Master Plan.
49
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 143 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Recommendation #2:
THAT the SLRD recognizes that the Pemberton and Area C Master Plan relies on the SLRD’s adoption and implementation of the Corridor Recreational Trails Management Plan (as it addresses fundamental and overarching region-wide trail standards, requirements and processes).
Recommendation #3
THAT the SLRD be required to issue an annual monitoring report to the residents of the Village of Pemberton and Area C that provides information regarding the current status of the Master Plan’s implementation and updates relating to the Action Plan.
Recommendation #4:
THAT in accordance with the annual findings of Recommendation #3, the SLRD will work with local trail and community interests to ensure that the Master Plan will continue to be a dynamic and relevant document for future trail planning and development.
5.2 Trail Development Partners and Community Interests
The Master Plan identifies the significant number of partners that are involved with the appropriate planning, development and maintenance of trails within the Pemberton area. In particular, the document highlights applicable legislation, policies, agreements and protocols that must be respected. The establishment and construction of trail routings, therefore must continue incorporate and engage these partnerships and/or interests in the implementation of the Master Plan.
Recommendation #5 THAT the SLRD Board consider establishing an Advisory Area Trails Group that provides feedback to the SLRD, as required, on implementing trail projects and funding opportunities.
The Group could be a continuation of the Master Plan’s Stakeholder Group (PVTA, Farmer’s Institute, Pemberton Nordics, Seniors (55+), Off-Road Rebels, Equestrian, Museum and Archives, etc), and could also be expanded to include a representative of private property interests. The Committee may also provide feedback on the Sea to Sky Trail alignment and improvements.
5.3 Trail Routing Priorities
The Master Plan consultation process clearly identified the Valley Loop and the Friendship Trail as the top two trail priorities.
50
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 144 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Recommendation #6
THAT the SLRD work with private interests that could provide connections to complete the Valley Loop and the Friendship Trail to secure rights of way or use agreements.
Recommendation #7
THAT the SLRD make application to the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and the Arts to achieve all Crown lands comprising part of the Valley Loop as an “Established Trail”.
Recommendation #8
THAT the SLRD commence design and construction of the final Valley Loop sections.
Recommendation #9
THAT the SLRD develop a management plan to limit land use and other conflicts along the Valley Loop and Friendship Trail alignments including but not limited to fencing, signage, waste receptacles and enforcement.
Recommendation #10
THAT the SLRD’s Area C and the Village of Pemberton Official Community Plans acquire the Valley Loop, Friendship Trail and other trail alignments identified in the Master Plan through the development approval process, where applicable.
Recommendation #11
THAT the SLRD commence design and construction of the Friendship Trail from the Village through to Mount Currie.
Recommendation #12
THAT the SLRD and the Village continue to work towards enhancing and expanding the One Mile Lake trail system, with priority for a universal access potential for the Lake Loop trail and an all-season(hard surfaced) connection to Nairn Falls Provincial Park.
Recommendation #13
THAT the Village expand the network of hard surface, all season trails to the Downtown from nearby neighbourhoods.
51
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 145 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Recommendation #14
THAT the SLRD and the Village work towards providing lighting on commuter (Friendship Trail) and Village’s the network of hard surface trails. All lighting shall be down-shielded and preserve the night sky.
Recommendation #15
THAT final trail alignments of the Valley Loop and Friendship Trails should involve consultation with local emergency service administrators.
Recommendation #16
THAT future consideration should be given to trailhead enhancements as identified in the Corridor Management Plan
Recommendation #17
THAT the SLRD continue to acquire rights of way and construct portions of the Master Plan trail network in accordance with future community priorities and available opportunities.
Recommendation #18
THAT the SLRD give priority to the following future trail expansion areas: One Mile Lake (Signal Hill) area, MacKenzie Basin and the Waterfall Trail areas.
5.4 Trail Maintenance Priorities
The Management Plan provides detailed inventories of the area trails on Crown land. The maintenance program for the Pemberton area would be consistent with these directions. Particular focus should be given to the One Mile Lake trails, Mackenzie Basin and the Waterfall Trail.
5.6 Major Trail Infrastructure Improvements
Recommendation #19
THAT a top priority for a major trail infrastructure improvement be a multi- use (with priority on horses) bridge crossing of the Lillooet River) and a non- vehicular crossing of the CN Rail Line to enable the Valley Loop Trail to provide an alternative and safe access to the Downtown.
5.7 Achieving Trail Rights of Way
Fundamental to the success of the trail system is the acquisition or permission to use the designated routings. The SLRD’s Corridor Recreation Trail Management Plan identifies the process for the provincial authorization of existing or proposed trails on Crown lands (see flow chart below). This process, however, does not
52
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 146 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
specifically detail more localized challenges in the Pemberton area, nor does it consider options for achieving routes through private property.
Recommendation #20
THAT new trail routings or major trail improvements would be reviewed within the Pemberton Area in accordance with the process identified in Section 5.7. of the Master Plan.
Recommendation #21
THAT the SLRD’s Area C and Village of Pemberton’s Official Community Plans be amended to include to be consistent with the Pemberton and Area C Trails Master Plan including policies, maps and/or schedules, including the acceptance of the “net gain of trails policy”.
The subsequent flow chart, however, considers the more localized process that should also be followed in the acquiring of rights of way or other appropriate tenure for Crown lands on private property.
53
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 147 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
5.8 Funding
The Pemberton and Area C Master Plan is an ambitious document that not only will require considerable funding for trail design and construction but also ongoing maintenance, right of way acquisition (legal agreements, etc), major infrastructure works, and engineering. In the Pemberton area, the PVTA has provided significant funding and resources to trail maintenance, however, there should be recognition that the enjoyment and benefits of the trails is a more far-reaching responsibility whether trails be for recreation, access, racing or commuting.
The Management Plan has outlined goals and objectives for the development of a Fundraising Management Plan (refer to Appendix A). The Fundraising Plan recognizes that external sources of ongoing funding is fundamental to the successful implementation of a trails program.
Recommendation #22
THAT the SLRD and the Village of Pemberton adopt the Corridor Fundraising Management Plan as contained within the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan and that the annual review of the Master Plan include consideration of the fundraising strategy on both a local and regional level as well as the Trail Service Area fees.
5.9 Maintenance and Risk Management
The Management Plan identifies maintenance and risk management programs for trails on Crown land. It is recommended that these directives also be extended to trails on non-Crown lands where the SLRD and the Village work towards establishing a long term program for the ongoing maintenance and repair of the local trail system. Further, ongoing operations should be understood as each new trail is established.
5.10 Conflict Resolution
The process for conflict resolution is provided in the Management Plan (refer to Appendix A).
5.11 Communications
Communications refers to communication of the SLRD to the local trail interests on matters affecting existing and future trail development, as well as communications directly to the users (safety). The Management Plan provides a comprehensive communications program that should also be adopted as part of this Master Plan implementation. The Communications Strategy is attached as Appendix A
54
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 148 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
5.1 Action Plan
Lead Supporting Timeline Funding
1. Master Plan Administration 1. Adoption of PMP SLRD VoP Apr ‘09 - 2. Adopt CRTMP SLRD Apr ‘09 - 3. Annually Monitor PMP SLRD VoP, AATG April ‘10 SA Ops 4. Monitoring Reporting SLRD VoP, AATG Jun ‘10 SA
2. Partners / Community Interests 5. Area Advisory Trails Group SLRD/VoP Stakeholders May ‘09 SA
3. Trail Routing Priorities 6. Secure Valley Loop ROW SLRD, PPO AATG Aug ‘09 SA Ops 7. Valley Loop Establishment SLRD MTCA Sept ’09? SA Ops 8. Design and Construct Valley Loop SLRD AATG, VoP, Ongoing Grants PVDD, MTCA 9. Valley Loop and Friendship Trail SLRD AATG, VoP, Sept ‘09 SA Ops Management Plan MTCA, PVDD 10. Dev Review Approvals for VoP, SLRD & AATG Ongoing SLRD & VoP Ops Friendship Trail and Valley Loop PPO 11. Design and construction of SLRD, PPO, AATG, LN, Onging Friendship Trail VoP MTCA, CN 12. One Mile Enhancement VoP, SLRD AATG, Rotary, Ongoing Grants and FR MTCA 13. Hard Surface Trails VoP SLRD, AATG Ongoing CAC, Grants 14. Lighting SLRD, VoP AATG, VoP, Ongoing CAC, Grants MTCA, PVDD 15. Emergency Consultation SLRD and EMS Jun ‘09 SA Ops 16. Trailhead Enhancements SLRD, VoP, MTCA, S2S, Ongoing VoPCAC, Grants, PPO AATG, PVDD, FR 17. Implement Master Plan SLRD, VoP AATG Ongoing VoPCAC, Grants, FR 18. Future Expansion Areas SLRD VoP, MTCA, Ongoing SA Ops AATG
4. Trail Maintenance Priorities
5. Major Infrastructure Improvements 19. Bridge and CN Crossing SLRD MoE, AATG, Ongoing VoP CAC, Grants, VoP MTCA, CN, FR PVDD
6. Achieving Trail Rights of Way 20. Routings/Improvement Priorities SLRD VoP Ongoing SA Ops 21. OCP Amendments SLRD, VoP Dec ‘09 SLRD & VoP Ops
7. Funding 22. Fundraising Plan Jun ‘09 SA Ops
8. Risk Management
9. Conflict Resolution
10. Communications
55
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 149 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
SLRD=Squamish Lillooet PVDD=Pemberton Valley SA Ops=SLRD Service Area Regional District Dyking District Operations
VoP=Village of Pemberton LN=Lil’wat Nation SLRD Ops=SLRD General Operations
AATG=Advisory Area Trails CN=CN Rail VoP=General Operations Group
PPO=Private Property Owners S2S=Sea to Sky Trail FR=Fundraising
MTCA=Min. Tourism, Culture EMS=Emergency Services CAC=Community Amenity and the Arts Contribution
56
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 150 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Figure #1 – Existing Trails
57
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 151 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Figure #2 –Environmentally Sensitive Areas
58
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 152 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Figure #3 –– Trails Master Plan
59
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 153 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Appendices
60
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 154 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Appendix A Excerpts of the Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan
A-1 Fundraising Management Plan A-2 Conflict Management Plan A-3 Communications Plan
61
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 155 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Appendix B- Net Gail of Trails
62
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 156 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
Fundraising Management Plan
Goal: To raise funding on an ongoing basis to help maintain and expand the recreational trail network in the Sea to Sky Corridor. This funding should come from an array of public, private and not-for-profit sectors. A direct user-pay system is not supported.
Objectives:
Generate resource and funding support from the businesses that are experiencing direct revenue gains from the existence of the Corridor Recreational Trails (i.e., tour, accommodation and development companies, events and related outdoor recreational product manufacturers).
Encourage contributions from companies who generate revenue indirectly from the trails (i.e., accommodation businesses, real estate companies, restaurants/bars, coffee shops, gas stations, etc.).
Pursue traditional forms of fundraising such as grants, sponsorship and philanthropic donors. There are many groups looking for funding for worthy projects throughout the Sea to Sky Corridor and in order to be one of the successful programs, Corridor trails must provide the type of leadership and cohesion that gives sponsors and donors the confidence to participate in the program.
Dovetail efforts with local user groups to coordinate the fundraising strategy and not duplicate or compete with other important community initiatives (in particular, Sea to Sky Trail and the Trans Canada Trail).
Continue to pursue senior government funding for the trail initiatives.
Pursue website and other publication banner ad sponsorship.
a) Establish Formal Fundraising Committee(s)
75 of 88
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 157 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
In addition to the financial support already forthcoming from the local and provincial governments, there is a strong opportunity to achieve funding from the private sector. The first order of business is to form a Fundraising Committee and to create a Fundraising Strategy. This initiative should be coordinated with the funding sources sought by the Sea to Sky Trail initiative.
It is recommended that the Committee comprise high-profile individuals from throughout the Corridor, which may include representation from trail enthusiasts and stakeholders who may live outside the region (i.e., Lower Mainland second homeowners, businesses, American Friends of Whistler).
The Committee members should have experience in building capacity from other community projects with awareness of or experience in identifying funding from both traditional and non-traditional sources. Recruiting for the Committee should consider the conventional newspaper advertisement but also personal contacts. Appointments to the Fundraising Committee should be determined by the SLRD through the Steering Committee.
The first task for the Committee should be the development of a Fundraising Strategy and possible funding sources to be pursued. The Strategy should also identify through the action plan specific projects that require funding. It is important that funding requests be tied to tangible deliverables.
b) Work with local Commercial Operators to ensure they are involved in the trail management process.
The Integrated Land Management Bureau (Ministry of Agriculture and Lands) is currently working with commercial operators on trail use in the Corridor. The Management Plan has recognized the importance of coordination with tenured commercial users.
c) Trail Coordination Committee to explore concept and establish framework for trail “adoption” programs.
There are many successful trail adoption programs in place throughout North America that assist in the maintenance of existing trail networks. In review of several of these programs,
76 of 88
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 158 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
it appears that most comprise only limited, high-level initiatives (more of a trail sweep and trim). Maintenance projects in the Sea to Sky Corridor are challenged with difficult terrain, a wet climate and extensive infrastructure. A Corridor trail adoption program would need to be much more extensive, pursuing not only periodic volunteer assistance but financial resources to retain professional trail builders. It is also likely that sponsors will be needed to ensure that they are protected from any liability concerns of their adopted trail.
The trail adoption program, however, can be an effective resource to the trails in the region, as it provides a mechanism for individuals and businesses to actively participate in the ongoing care of the trails in the community either through financial contributions, ongoing labour or supplies. The trail adoption program (following a public education and promotion campaign) should be targeted towards businesses that realize the importance or directly benefit from the long- term maintenance and expansion of the infrastructure.
Benefits to the adopter to include:
Banner recognition advertisement on the Sea to Sky Corridor Recreational Trail website; Logo recognition on trailhead signs; Business promotion of opportunities for their involvement in the trail adoption program; and Continued contribution to the quality of the region’s trail network.
Administration of the adoption program:
The Steering Committee shall administer the program; A contractor shall be hired to work with the Fundraising Committee to seek out and secure adopters (commission or fee); Each trail adopter shall enter into an agreement with the SLRD considering aspects such as minimum requirements, contractors, promotion and liability; A trust shall be established for businesses contributing funds to a certain adopted trail to ensure that they are appropriately allocated; and Trail selection and work plan improvements shall be coordinated through the Steering Committee and local
77 of 88
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 159 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
clubs to ensure resources will complement and not duplicate existing trail maintenance programs.
78 of 88
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 160 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
2.2.3 Trail Use Conflicts
The Sea to Sky Corridor provides an extensive trail network accessible to many different users whether they be walking, biking or on motorized transportation. To ensure that the trail system is effectively managed it is important that there are quality opportunities for recognized recreational trail users. Currently the Corridor accommodates motorized and non-motorized users, and therefore with the increasing pressures on the existing trail infrastructure it is important to understand the potential concerns and mitigating efforts to minimize the conflicts among trail users.
a) Identify and maintain key access routes for motorized users
The Trail Strategy’s Management Objectives indicates the importance of establishing or approving both motorized and non- motorized trails. Section 2 identifies key staging areas while Section 3 and Appendix “D” identifies shared use of the trials (from mechanized, equestrian, or motorized users). A mentioned in Section 1.3.4 trials bikes (i.e. no seat and speeds similar to mountain bikes) are considered to fall in the same category as mountain bikes rather than motorized users. The design of motorized trails should consider the following: Focus motorized trails away from sensitive environmental areas and/or provincial parks; Require signs that provide warnings related to potential trail conflicts, obstacles wildlife and safety concerns. Focus motorized users in areas that have ease of road access; Favour motorized trails that were previously resource roads (decommissioned logging roads); Ensure that trail construction practices provide a durable and stable surface; Keep trails away from watercourses and other riparian areas; Create designated off-road vehicle (ORV) parking areas at destinations (lakes, view points); Attempt to provide sufficient soundscape buffer zones to other land uses and recreational users by using the natural terrain and vegetation (note: sound rises); Design trails to discourage travel at higher speeds due to safety and wildlife concerns; Select trails with adequate sightlines;
69 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 161 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
Encourage the construction of one way looped trails to reduce collisions and reduce maintenance costs; Provide parking lot, trailer turnaround and drop-offs at trailhead staging areas; Ensure that soils/surfacing, bridging and any other trail features are durable for the anticipated motorized use; Discourage road crossings and if necessary ensure the necessary safety provisions (signage, speed bumps, gates) are installed; and Discourage intersections with non-motorized recreationalists and non-motorized trail users.
b) Identify motorized and non-motorized permitted trails expansion areas.
At this time it has proved difficult to definitively identify new trails or trail development areas that are appropriate for motorized users. The Trail Strategy, informal consultation and Internet searches have identified the following existing motorized trail areas:
Cheakamus Canyon (part of the Sea to Sky Trail)* Cat Lake** Brohm Lake* Hut Lake Paradise Valley Upper Mamquam/Raffuse Brandywine Mountain Sproat Mountain Rutherford Creek Meager Mountain Upper Lillooet Green River
c) Adopt and employ a hierarchy of management tools to reduce potential for conflict (Conflict Management Plan).
The Sea to Sky Corridor must ensure that the multitude of trail users and modes of travel are appropriately managed to reduce conflict and to maximize the positive trail experience. Most of the recent research concerning trail conflicts has been done as a result of mountain biking. The International Mountain Bicycling
70 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 162 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
Association has published a guidebook, Managing Mountain Biking. Much of this section was informed by the book’s section entitled “Managing User Conflict.”
In the Sea to Sky Corridor, there are three recognized concerns relating to trail conflicts, as follows:
Environment: Continued public awareness of the value of local ecosystems is resulting in an increasing interest in mitigating the negative impacts of recreational uses on the natural environment. In the Sea to Sky region it is understood that to be a desirable outdoor recreation destination, trail infrastructure should not significantly impact the environment.
Safety/Risk Management: The existence of many different trail users may result in inherent conflicts related to a user’s comfort with personal safety, particularly where users share trails and use different modes of transportation (motocross, mountain bikes, horses). The following Safety Code has been developed for Corridor trails:
Figure 2-7: BC Trail Safety Code
71 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 163 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
Traditional vs. New Users: The rapid growth of the Sea to Sky region has resulted in increased use of trails. Routes primarily used for hiking, horseback riding and hunting are now sharing the trail with new modes of travel including motocross, trials bikes, mountain biking (cross country, downhill and free-ride) and trail runners. The individuals on the trail have also changed from typically local residents to visitors from around the world. The trail system also facilitates commercial recreation operators and competitive events. This change in traditional use of trails can lead to conflict, particularly if the rules of trail use responsibility are not respected.
A Conflict Management Plan has been prepared that addresses best practices to minimize the potential for environmental impacts, risk management concerns and social disturbances related to trail use considering a Code of Conduct, User Group Involvement, Education, Designated Trails.
Code of Conduct: The following Corridor trail etiquette code needs to consider all users. The following has been developed and will be posted at trailheads and staging areas: Figure 2-8: SLRD Trail
72 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 164 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
Use Group Involvement and Trail User Education: The Communications Strategy provided in Section 2.1.1.3 identifies opportunities for ongoing trail user and user group involvement.
Designated Trail Use: The trail inventory identified in Section 3 indicates the trail user for each route. The majority of the trails within the Corridor are available for hiking and biking use, with a limited number available for equestrian and motorized use. It is important, however, to ensure that each trail user has sufficient lands to recreate, particularly due to:
unnecessary impacts and maintenance costs from concentrated use if there is not a net gain of trails. possible insufficient share of resources and priority allocated to trails to keep them maintained to design standards. potential increase in conflicts between users if the number of permitted trails declines (i.e. poaching of Figure 2-9: SLRD Trail non-motorized trails). Markers
Signage: The sign template to the right has been developed to provide trail routing information, technical difficulty and shared use (yield protocol). More detailed information regarding the trail signs information is included within the Trails Strategy.
Enforcement of Regulations: The Trail Patrols identified in Section 2.2.2 d) are intended to be a proactive approach to trail enforcement. At this time it is not recommended that a trail enforcement initiative be pursued, but rather education, communications and dispute resolution be the preferred course of action.
A proactive approach to minimizing potential for conflict is to ensure that personal safety, preservation of the natural environment and user experience are paramount. It should be recognized that environmental, safety and use conflicts all compromise this goal and therefore their resolution is paramount to a successful trail network.
73 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 165 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
d) Establish a framework for resolving trail use conflicts or disputes.
The following provides an approach to conflict resolution for the resolution of trail-related issues:
Receive in writing (email) from the complainant the policy or procedure being contravened; Arrange a meeting with the complainant; If the meeting does not resolve the complaint – meet with Steering Committee and reconsider; prepare a written report to the complainant of the decision; If still not acceptable, Steering Committee meets with the complainant – referred to the SLRD for a decision; Monitor and get back to all involved interests; and Ensure the final decision is consistent with local and senior government requirements.
74 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 166 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
Communications Strategy
A/ Messaging
The SLRD should formally adopt clear messaging regarding the Corridor Trail’s initiatives as follows:
i. Purpose of the Initiative ii. Information regarding Trail Conditions (closures, detours, etc.) iii. Post Trail Ratings and Permitted Users iv. Status of Trail Approvals v. Information about Trail Safety and Conditions vi. Information about Environmental or Hazardous Constraints vii. Trail User’s Code of Conduct viii. Commitment for ongoing Public and Interest Group Involvement ix. Recognition of Adopted Trail Standards and other Trail- related Policies x. Current Construction Projects xi. Risk Management Program xii. Any other relevant resources
B/ Tools
The following tools are intended to provide readily available information to local trail users and clubs specific to the status of the Corridor trail network:
i. Trailhead Information Signs – Messaging noted in A/ and any current news (i.e., municipal notices and website links) should be posted both at staging areas (parking and facilities) and trailheads. ii. Corridor Trails Website - The SLRD should develop a website that allows two-way communication between trail users and the Steering Committee or their designate to include the messaging and a blog to promote discussions about the trail system and detailed contact and reporting information. iii. Media Releases and Advertising- Encourage the use of promotional materials (i.e., municipal notices/websites, guidebooks, maps, Spirit Day, with
29 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 167 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
tourism and chamber offices) about the management and extent of the Corridor Recreational Trail network. Further, promote and publicize the efforts in the local media by sharing information and opportunities for input from users and stakeholders in the Corridor. iv. Open Lines of Communication - Provide frequent updates from the Steering Committee to First Nations, trail interests (AGM and Board of Directors) and SLRD Board of Directors or local government council meetings. v. Blog - Provide comment or suggestion forums through an interactive blog on the website. vi. Annual (biannual) Trails Forum - Ensure and enable participation of trail interests and clubs at the Trail Forums.
C/ Partnerships
The local trail interests can be further assisted by developing partnerships in the management and maintenance of trails through assistance with the following:
i. Training and Education - Facilitate the professional training and education of users in the planning, design and construction of sustainable trail practices (not only improving the quality of the trail infrastructure but providing career skills training for the local workforce). ii. Trail Maintenance Assistance - Partner with an array of trail users on the management and maintenance of the amenities particularly, through assistance in the planning and execution of trail days. The Steering Committee delegate could provide additional resources to enable the events to be effectively promoted, well organized and enjoyable by developing a “how to” toolkit that considers the needs of the trails and volunteers. iii. Maximize Funding Opportunities - Pursue securing funding sources for trail maintenance and development. iv. Shared Decision-Making - Continue to inform and involve trail users, interests and stakeholders in trail
30 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 168 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
management through participation in decision- making. This can be achieved through the establishment of a Sea to Sky Recreational Trail Forum and fostering local and/or regional trail coordination committees.
D/ Trail Planning
It is important to continue to involve clubs and their memberships specifically in the ongoing planning, maintenance, approvals and expansion of trail development areas. Notably, trail planning would include:
i. Trail Standards, Future Growth Areas, and/or Closures/Restrictions – Clubs, organization and the public should be involved in review leading up to the establishment of trail standards, future development and/or trail closures.
ii. Annual Trail Sweeps - Require an annual trail sweep by community interests becoming involved in high- level inspections.
iii. User Interaction - Provide ongoing opportunities for positive interaction and contributions among different users through the annual Trails forum and other workshops.
The Communications Strategy was primarily developed to ensure input from government, and individual and organized trail interests. Section 1.2.6 of this plan specifically addresses the intent to develop a protocol for engagement of First Nations on future trail initiatives.
31 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 169 of 408 PEMBERTON AND AREA C SERVICE AREA TRAILS MASTER PLAN
Appendix B- Net Gail of Trails
63
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 170 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
A Net Gain Trails Policy in the Sea to Sky Corridor DRAFT POLICY STATEMENT for adoption by the SLRD
Local government shall:
1. Work to provide mechanisms for the ongoing management, retention, improvement and expansion of the existing recreation trail network.
2. Enable the preservation of the existing trail network’s overall quality, quantity and experience.
3. Require that when new development or resource uses occur in proximity to existing trails, the trail amenity be protected through best practices in planning, design and management.
4. Only consider the rerouting or redevelopment of an existing trail when protection is not possible due to the pending impacts of new development or resource uses and where the proposed changes have been deemed necessary to achieve other important community objectives.
5. Guarantee a net gain to the overall quality, quantity and/or experience of the trail network in the rerouting and redevelopment of existing trails.
6. Apply an experience-based (fun, trail users, scenery, challenge, etc.) rather than only a quantity (length of trail) based approach in the planning and development of new trails. This will allow the desirable qualitative aspects of local trails to be retained.
7. Require that the cost of completing any replacement trails will be borne by the property owner or resource use licensee.
8. Agree to the rerouting or redevelopment of discontinued trails for the replacement trail must be secured prior to final approval of the new land development or resource uses. Cash-in-lieu for trail development will only be considered when it is deemed acceptable to the local municipality).
55 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 171 of 408 Corridor Recreational Trail Management Plan May 2009
9. Incorporate the net gain for trails approach into an amenity agreement/density bonus policy recognized in municipal Official Community Plans, triggered in conjunction with rezoning and development applications.
10. Work with advisory groups to identify potential trail network expansion and/or enhancement areas that are consistent with, and can be incorporated into, integrated land use processes, regional and/or municipal plans.
56 of 89
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 172 of 408 REQUEST FOR DECISION APRIL 16, 2010
SUBJECT: Pemberton Valley Trails Association Grant Request
RECOMMENDATION: THAT the Board approve a grant to the Pemberton Valley Trails Association for the MacKenzie Connector and other 2010 trail construction projects in the amount of $30,000, with funds from General Select Funds.
CAO COMMENTS: Concur with the recommendation. PRE.
Report/Document: Attached
KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: The Pemberton Valley Trails Association (PVTA) made a request to the Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee for a grant in the amount of $30,000 in order to complete Phase 2 of the Mackenzie/Owl Lakes Trail. Phase 1 was completed last year, with partial funding from the SLRD’s General Select funds. The PVUS committee suggested that a regional funding source would be more appropriate for a project of this scope.
RELEVANT POLICY: The Board has consistently supported trail development throughout the region. The Draft Corridor trails plan and Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan both identify the Mackenzie basin area as a preferred option for trail development.
DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Assistance with completion of a spectacular community and regional amenity.
RESPONSE OPTIONS: 1. Provide a grant to the PVTA from General Select Funds for $30,000 2. Provide a grant from an alternate source 3. Suggest alternate funding
PREFERRED STRATEGY: Completion of the project will provide the region with an impressive regional amenity, comparable with the Seven Summits Trail in Rossland and other famous mountain bike destinations.
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
GENERAL: Trails which provide access to the alpine are rare in our region, and can provide a destination for mountain bikers and other recreationalists, providing an economic benefit to the area. This trail is “epic” in scope, point-to-point, and would be a multi-day trip or one very long day. When completed, it would allow riders to ride from Pemberton to Tenquille Lake Trail and Owl Lakes, completely off-road, through the alpine overlooking Pemberton and the Meadows. The trail is garnering international interest. Phase 1 was recently highlighted in a two-page spread in Bike Magazine, the premier North American mountain biking publication.
The Trails Association proposes to build several sections of trail which will link the work done in 2009, in order to complete the continuous trail from Pemberton to the alpine.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 173 of 408 There is one other project bundled into the funding request; an extension of the PhD Trail, the trail head of which is located near the Rutherford Creek Power building. These trails lie outside the Pemberton Valley Trails Service Area, but do fall within the Sea to Sky Trails service area.
Total estimate for the work planned this summer is $40,000. The PVTA has requested $30,000 from the SLRD.
The SLRD has provided grants to PVTA in previous years for both operations and capital works. The Pemberton Valley Trails Association has a proven record of completing significant projects and depends on grants of this nature to complete its major projects.
ORGANIZATIONAL: Some Finance and UES staff involvement regarding provision of the funding.
FINANCIAL: The General Select fund has $67,000 unallocated to date this year. SLRD provided $25,000 in 2009 from General Select Funds for this project, which was the recipient of a NTC (federal) grant. NTC funding is not available in 2010.
FOLLOW UP ACTION: Liaise with grant recipients to determine timing and payment of funds.
COMMUNICATION: Publication in SLRD newsletter, and communication with grant recipients.
Submitted by: Allison Macdonald
Reviewed by: Paul Edgington, CAO
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 174 of 408 SLRD PembertonRegular Meeting Valley Agenda; Utilities April& Services 26, 2010 Committee Meeting Agenda; April 12, 2010 Page 168175 of 191408 SLRD PembertonRegular Meeting Valley Agenda; Utilities April& Services 26, 2010 Committee Meeting Agenda; April 12, 2010 Page 169176 of 191408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 177 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 178 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 179 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 180 of 408 768FBSPVI9 ! 6I6G`TDT ( y " % rvqrvhyv % y
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 181 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 182 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 183 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 184 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 185 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 186 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 187 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 188 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 189 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 190 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 191 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 192 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 193 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 194 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 195 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 196 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 197 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 198 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 199 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 200 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 201 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 202 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 203 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 204 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 205 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 206 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 207 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 208 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 209 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 210 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 211 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 212 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 213 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 214 of 408 Information Report
Garibaldi at Squamish Environmental Assessment Report
Date: April 19, 2010
Recommendation:
That the SLRD comments set out in the Director of Planning and Development report dated April 19, 2010 regarding the Garibaldi at Squamish Environmental Assessment Report be endorsed as the position of the SLRD Regional Board and that the report be forwarded to the Environmental Assessment Office.
Purpose:
To advise the Board of staff comments submitted to the Environmental Assessment Office regarding the technical analysis of the proposed Garibaldi at Squamish resort
Background:
The Environmental Assessment Office has provided a synopsis of Garibaldi at Squamish as currently proposed as follows:
As currently proposed, the Master Plan for the resort base development anticipates the construction of 1,480 single-family homes, 806 multi-family units, 1,762 resort condominiums/apartments, and 1,675 hotel rooms. These represent a total of 22,502 total bed units at full build-out of the proposed Project. It is expected that all the hotel rooms and a large proportion of the resort condominium units would be available on a daily or weekly rental basis for destination visitors. Two golf courses and associated practice facilities are proposed to be located on either side of Highway 99, closely linked to residential areas. A Village Centre with hotels and a variety of retail and commercial uses is planned, with close links to residential areas. The Village Centre would also have a Cultural/Recreational area to allow for a range of cultural amenities and recreational activities. There would also be a commercial/retail centre, and possibly a Squamish Nation cultural centre, at the resort entrance from Highway 99.
Five large, open water storage reservoirs and associated dams (covering approximately 18 hectares) are proposed to supply potable water and water for irrigation, fire fighting and snowmaking purposes (see Figure 3 for approximate locations). The five dams range from 20 to 50 metres in height. Potable water treatment facilities and smaller, closed storage reservoirs for treated potable water would also be built. Other facilities proposed include onsite power transmission structures linking to the nearby BC Hydro Cheekye substation, solid and liquid waste management facilities, parking lots, an interchange with Highway 99 and approximately 100 km of onsite roadways (including those noted above for the mountain development) to service the overall development. A variety of additional recreational facilities, including a trail system (serving hikers, cyclists, Nordic skiers, equestrians and pedestrians in the base area), are also proposed.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 215 of 408 North GPP
Cat Lake
Brohm Lake Highway 99
Figure 3: Base Development showing proposed residential neighbourhoods, commercial areas (areas 1, 7 and 9) and golf courses as well as Cat Lake and Brohm Lake. GPP=Garibaldi Provincial Park = approximate location of five proposed water storage reservoirs (see figure 6, Section 5.8.3, for detailed reservoir locations)
It is anticipated that the proposed Project would be developed in three initial phases followed by longer-term build-out of the resort, taking 20 years to achieve full build- out of the resort as currently proposed (see Figure 4). The Proponent has noted that economic constraints, or yet to be identified business development opportunities, may lengthen or accelerate the phasing of the proposed Project.
The Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) is seeking comments from the Garibaldi at Squamish Working Group and the Proponent on the draft Assessment Report. The report is broad in scope and identifies numerous issues which have been considered in the EA process. This report will focus only on key issues which have been of significance to local government.
A number of significant issues and deficiencies in the proponent’s environmental assessment were identified by local government and others at the outset of the re-initiated EA process in late 2006. Key issues raised by the SLRD included the scale and design of the resort, water supply, environmental issues, and socio-economic issues such as employee housing and provision of community services. Despite the passing of more than two years since staff last reported on the GAS environmental assessment, the key issues remain incompletely addressed, as described in the following table:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 216 of 408 Key Issue Proponent EAO Conclusion SLRD Comment Commitment Water supply Defer outstanding issues The EA has reached a conclusion Proponent committed to continue to the MOE water that there are potentially adverse to collect stream flow data, but licensing process and impacts on the hydrology of the has not released data from year post EA certificate Brohm River and that the lack of two of monitoring program. The issuance discussions. adequate information precludes an lack of data has resulted in local Proponent advised EAO assessment of the significance of government continuing to have that the EAO has the those residual effects. The data significant unaddressed information needed to provided to date is inconclusive to concerns about whether complete the EA process demonstrate that sufficient water sufficient supply exists to serve and that no further work exists throughout the year to serve the resort at build out and/or will be undertaken. the resort and meet requirements for during years of low flow. The Proponent has other purposes. SLRD and District of Squamish acknowledged the risk have expressed significant that the EA may result in The requirements of the concern that reliance on spring outstanding or Environmental Assessment Act freshet for resort water supply is unresolved issues. therefore may not have been met. If a serious concern, as any studies are deferred as the occurrence of insufficient annual proponent has suggested; the supply would be unacceptable. question has been raised as to what SLRD is also concerned that regulatory mechanism could be Ministry of Environment is unable used to ensure future studies are to adequately assess impacts on conducted to an acceptable fish and fish habitat due to standard. insufficient information. The SLRD is not reassured that commitments made with respect to water supply and hydrology have already gone unfulfilled in 2009. Fish & fish Commitment to Baseline information is very general Combined with the concerns of habitat undertake flow, and missing key information. local government about water ecological and Missing info re: steelhead is of supply and hydrology and the geomorphic data particular concern. Following each concerns expressed by MOE collection as part of the suspension of the EA process, the regarding lack of information on MOE water licensing proponent was directed to provide potentially significant impacts on process. information on the impacts of water fish and fish habitat; the SLRD withdrawals in sufficient detail to EA representative has expressed address identified concerns with concern and continues ask how respect to fish, fish habitat and other can an EA Certificate be issued biota. in the absence of critical information relating to such basic Deferring studies to the water aspects of the environmental licensing process raises questions assessment as the availability of about whether the EA Act water supply and the potential requirements are being met. impacts of water withdrawals on a significant fish resource. Wildlife & Commitment to Field surveys and assessments Wildlife concerns are not often wildlife habitat undertake additional carried out for a variety of species key issues in local government studies and develop including species at risk were planning and land use decisions. wildlife management insufficient to meet acceptable A main reason is that local plans prior to standards for an EA or absent government has traditionally commencement of altogether. been confident in MOE expertise construction in habitat management and Deferring studies and committing to stewardship and has accepted future work as a response to issues MOE conclusions and reduces the EAO’s ability to reach recommendations. informed conclusions regarding the potential for significant adverse While it is acknowledged that the impacts from the proposed project. EA process has been underway for many years; much of the reason for the lengthy process has been the reluctance of the proponent to provide information necessary for an informed and credible assessment.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 217 of 408 Key Issue Proponent EAO Conclusion SLRD Comment Commitment Geotechnical The proponent has The majority of geotechnical issues The EA report requires disagreed that any of the have been addressed. Key clarification regarding whether geotechnical risk outstanding concerns relate to dams new environmental assessments assessments were in and dam safety. EAO sought an of the proposed dams will be question. Dams will be explanation as to why large dams required in the future if an EA subject to more detailed are proposed in areas described as certificate is issued for the dam safety review by having high hazard potential. project. MOE during water licensing. Proponent has Each of the proposed dams is large assumed that that enough to independently trigger an information on the EA process and very little location and size of information has been provided. reservoirs and dams (five 20 – 50 metre high EAO concludes there is a low dams) could be probability, but very high magnitude submitted after the EA risk due to down slope public safety Certificate was issued. and environmental risks.
As a result, the EAO also concludes that deferral of studies raises concerns that the EA Act requirements are not being met. Economic The proponent has EAO acknowledges the possibility of DOS (and SLRD) identified Impacts committed to work with low magnitude, short term adverse concerns about the potential for the SLRD and DOS to economic impacts on Whistler within impacts on local government with resolve issues around the context of an overall conclusion respect to costs associated with socio-economic impacts that there is a very likely probability provision of infrastructure, transit, and governance of moderate to high beneficial policing, schools, health care and including the completion impact for local and provincial other community services. of a socio-economic and economies if the proposed project is RMOW raised concerns about fiscal impact study and built. potentially adverse economic submission of OCP impacts on Whistler resort. amendment and rezoning applications. The EAO conclusion appears to assume if the project is built it will be a success.
The DOS fiscal impact study, which assesses the fiscal impacts to Squamish was intended to assess the risk of failure under a variety of scenarios, has not been released.
RGS Proponent committed to EAO concluded that there is limited RGS issues including project smart potential for residual adverse effects adherence to smart growth and growth/sustainability on the RGS, smart growth and sustainability principles can be principles “where sustainability. addressed through local feasible”. Proponent has government application review acknowledged that local processes. government may seek to amend development designs to address these issues.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 218 of 408 Key Issue Proponent EAO Conclusion SLRD Comment Commitment Employee Proponent committed to Proponent commitment to allocate Further work on developing an housing work with Ministry of 10 percent of housing for employee appropriate housing strategy can Tourism, Culture and the housing and to work with local be done at the OCP stage and in Arts (MTCA) within the government on a housing strategy conjunction with the MTCA framework of the Master satisfies the EAO that the project process. Development Agreement would not have adverse impacts on to deal with employee employee housing. housing and to work with the region and local government on a regional housing solution, “where workable”. Liquid Waste Prior to construction, EAO is satisfied that the proposed SLRD has advocated for and Management develop and implement a Project would not have significant required “best management” water quality monitoring residual adverse effects due to liquid practices in conjunction with program to the waste management major developments. SLRD satisfaction of Ministry of expects that the local authority Environment for the river having jurisdiction over the that is selected (for project (SLRD or DOS) will treated effluent continue to advocate for best discharge) through the practices during the liquid waste Municipal Sewage management licensing process Regulation process. and require a high standard in Proponent has conjunction with future OCP and committed to ensuring zoning amendments. the effluent quality would be better than that required under the MSR. Solid Waste Proponent made a The EAO noted that regional Solid SLRD staff have provided Management commitment that it is Waste Management Plans are under detailed comments regarding responsible for development and may face some solid waste management developing and challenges in incorporating solid throughout the EA process. implementing an waste from the proposed Project. SLRD is satisfied that the acceptable solid waste EAO found that low to moderate Proponent’s commitments, which management plan. The adverse effects may occur if landfills become legally binding as a Proponent committed to become full and alternate sites or condition of an EA Certificate, complying with all options for disposal cannot be address SLRD concerns. principles and policies of established in a timely fashion but the SLRD Solid Waste that the project would not have Management Plan (2008) significant residual adverse effects. or any future amendments.
The Environmental Assessment addressed numerous additional issues in addition to those outlined above with respect to the proposed project’s effects on:
1. Vegetation 2. First Nation Consultation 3. Water Quality 4. Climate and air quality 5. Garibaldi and Alice Lake Provincial Parks 6. Environmental and Operational Management Plans 7. Community Recreation 8. Other Tenures 9. Heritage Effects 10. Health Effects (Healthy Living)
The EAO concluded that the application contained insufficient information to make any conclusions regarding the risk of significant adverse effects on vegetation and that the
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 219 of 408 proponent’s approach of deferring studies on this issue raises concerns about whether the EA Act requirements are being met. Conclusions regarding First Nations consultations are not included in the EA report circulated to Working Group members. With respect to the matters listed as items 3 – 10 above; based on its analysis, the EAO found that when taking into consideration the Proponent’s commitments (which become legally binding on issuance of an EA Certificate), the EAO was satisfied that the project would not result in significant adverse effects. SLRD representatives agree with the above conclusions.
Conclusion:
The EAO has concluded that, due to lack of information from the Proponents with respect to water supply and hydrology, fish and fish habitat, wildlife and wildlife habitat, vegetation and geotechnical considerations it cannot be determined if means have been identified to prevent significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project.
From the SLRD perspective water supply and geotechnical matters are of critical concern, as these are core areas of interest for local government. The viability of the proposed project demands that it be adequately serviced with a reliable water supply. Public safety within the proposed resort is also of paramount concern. The lack of information in assessing risks associated with reservoirs and dams, especially where each of the dams is large enough to trigger an environmental assessment by itself is simply not unacceptable.
To issue an EA Certificate under the above circumstances will in our view undermine the credibility of the provincial environmental assessment process.
Further, to issue an EA Certificate where there remain unresolved assessments regarding water supply and hydrology, fish and fish habitat, wildlife and wildlife habitat, vegetation and geotechnical issues would be an inappropriate down loading and transfer of responsibility to local government to deal with in conjunction with future OCP and zoning amendment applications.
Submitted by: Steven Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development Approved by: Paul Edgington, CAO
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 220 of 408 REQUEST FOR DECISION Non-Farm Use in the ALR Squamish Valley, Area D Bass Coast Music Festival
Recommendation: THAT the application for a non-farm use in the ALR, submitted by Bass Coast Projects Ltd. for the lands legally described as DL 994, NWD, to host a 4-day music festival as an annual event over the next 4 years (through 2013), be forwarded to the ALC with a recommendation of support, AND that if the scope or nature of the festival is, at any time in the next 4 years, no longer in substantial compliance with the proposal as submitted, a new application be required.
CAO Comments:
Background Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: Applicant is seeking approval for an annual 4-day festival to be held once per year for the next 4 years. NOTE: This report has been amended from the report that was presented to the EAD since it was determined by the ALC that this must be considered as a new application, and not a reconsideration as we were originally advised. Relevant Policy: Land is un-zoned under SLRD Area ‘D’ Zoning Bylaw No. 540, events hosting 500 or more people require Special Event Permit from SLRD. Strategic Relevance: n/a Desired Outcome(S): Application forwarded to ALC with recommendation of support Response Options: 1. Support the application for the festival over the next 4 years, as an annual 4-day event, as presented; 2. Not support the amended request, and forward concerns to ALC for their consideration; 3. Support the amended request, subject to specific conditions not described in the resolution above. Preferred Strategy: Option 1
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
General: If approved, the ongoing approval for an annual festival will allow the festival organizers to operate with a greater degree of certainty for their event, which will allow for better planning, and will mean less financial hardship as they will not have to resubmit the same application materials (and the $600.00 fee) every year. Organizational: Support of application consistent with zoning bylaw (no zoning, thus use is not prohibited) Follow Up Action: Forward amendment request, staff reports, and Board recommendation to ALC Communication: Applicant copied on correspondence to ALC Other Comments: None
Submitted by: T. Napier Endorsed by: Reviewed by:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 221 of 408
Request for Decision Background Report Prepared by0 Tracy Napier, Planning Technician Prepared For: SLRD Board of Directors, April 2010
Subject: Application for Non-Farm Use in the ALR
Applicant: Bass Coast Project Ltd., Agent (Ali Albolfathi, Owner) Legal Description: DL 994, NWD General Location: 16.5 Mile, Squamish Valley Road, Area D
Problem Defined:
BACKGROUND
The EAD and Board will recall that in April 2009 the following resolution was passed with respect to an application for non-farm use in the ALR for the Bass Coast Music Festival in the Upper Squamish Valley:
THAT the application for a non-farm use in the ALR, submitted by Bass Coast Projects Ltd., for the lands legally described as DL 994, NWD be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission with a recommendation of support, with the same conditions, as appropriate, as for the Pemberton Music Festival submission to the ALR.
The following conditions from the Pemberton Music Festival were forwarded for the Commission’s consideration, as per the resolution above:
. # . / / . / > / 5
The ALC visited the site, and approved the application by Resolution # 184/2009 (see attached), with no conditions.
The subject property is roughly 72ha in size, and approximately 45ha are within the ALR. A limited number of the festival activities are proposed to occur on lands within the ALR, however the permission of the Commission is still required (see attached Subject Property Map).
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 222 of 408
PROPOSAL The applicants are seeking approval again for the same festival, but they have amended their original application to request approval for the festival to be held as an annual 4-day event for the next 4 years (through 2013).
Currently, their approval from 2009 was for a single event. Based on the successful outcome from last year’s festival, the proponents wish to continue to host this event, and are seeking approval for the annual event.
The proposed annual festival has not changed in nature from the original proposal, and remains a two day music festival (4-day to accommodate arrival and departure days), with the majority of the festival activities occurring outside the ALR. Only the festival gates, a security check-point, and a portable toilet will be within the ALR, at the entrance to the property. All other festival activities occur outside the ALR.
The applicants predict that the scope of the festival would gradually increase over the next 4 years to reach a maximum of 2000 participants. They state that the ALC approval in 2009 was based on an estimated attendance of 1500, however the actual attendance was 450. They have provided the following forecast of their growth over the next 4 years to a maximum of 2000 people, but it is noted that the attendance may be well below the forecast numbers:
YEAR PREDICTED ATTENDANCE 2009 1500 participants (actual attendance was 450) 2010 600 participants 2011 1000 participants 2012 1500 participants 2013 2000 participants
The applicant’s have indicated that the Squamish Valley RV and Campground, which is a non- farm use that was approved by the ALC under File # YY-30447, will continue to be used for festival parking and camping.
POLICY
The subject property is designated Agriculture in the Electoral Area Whistler South Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 495, and it is un-zoned under Zoning Bylaw 540.
The OCP contains the following policies with respect to agricultural Land:
4.2.1 The Regional District supports the agricultural industry and the mandate of the Agricultural Land Commission to protect lands which have value for agricultural purposes;
5.2.3.3 Uses permitted in areas designated as Agriculture are agriculture and residential.
Special Events Permit In addition to permission from the Agricultural Land Commission, the applicant’s are required to obtain a Special Event Permit (SEP) from the SLRD for any event hosting 500 or more people. As part of the process in applying for a SEP, the applicant is required to provide information to show that the proposal has been considered and approved by the appropriate health authority, the RCMP, and the local Fire Marshal.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 223 of 408
The applicant received a SEP for the 2009 festival, and will be required to obtain a new SEP for each and every event that hosts 500 or more people, regardless of the outcome of the ALC application for ongoing ALR approval for the non-farm use associated with the festival. Since the applicant has indicated that they expect over 500 attendees for each of the next 5 years, a SEP will be required each year in order to ensure that issues related to the health and safety of the public and festival participants are adequately addressed. The applicants are aware of this requirement, and have already started to prepare their materials for the SEP application process. Staff are not aware of any complaints or concerns related to the 2009 event.
AGRICULTURAL CAPABILITY
The provincial agricultural capability mapping indicates that the land in the vicinity of the subject property is rated 70% Class 2 with excessive water as a limiting factor, and 30% Class 4 with low moisture holding capacity as a limiting factor. The lands are improvable to 70% Class 1 and 30% Class 2 with low moisture holding capacity as a limiting factor.
This rating system is based on 7 Classes, with Class 1 having no limitations, and Class 7 having no productivity. This information was gathered from the 92G/14 Agricultural Capability Map from the Ministry of Environment, Ecosystems Branch.
ADJACENT LAND USES
The applicant describes the adjacent land uses as follows:
North: Private land, not farmed, no primary residence East: Squamish Valley Road, partially used for hay South: Cheakamus Indian Reserve No. 11, Glacier Valley Farms, organic vegetables and herbs West: Squamish River, Crown land
LETTERS OF SUPPORT
In 2009 the applicant included several letters of support for the proposed festival from adjacent land owners, and contacted the Squamish Nation for their input and comment. They have initiated contact again with the Squamish Nation, and also one new property owner on the east side of the Squamish Valley Road.
Conclusion: The proposed amendment would enable the festival organizers to have a degree of certainty that is critical to hosting an event such as this, which involves planning and booking entertainment and resources far in advance. Under the current approval, they are required to submit an entirely new application each year, regardless of whether any of the proposed activities have changed. The proposed festival for 2010 is essentially the same as the festival from 2009, but is amended to seek approval over 4 years, in order to avoid the need to keep making an application for the same event each year.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 224 of 408
Supporting the new application, including the on-going approval as proposed, would relieve the festival organizers from the need to submit the application materials and fee again each year. If there were to be any significant changes to the scope or nature of the festival, a new application would be required. It is noted that all of the festival events take place on land that is outside the ALR, and only the administrative/convenience uses listed below are part of the ALC approval, and thus part of the request for reconsideration for ongoing approval:
security checkpoint / entrance gate; portable toilet; recycling and garbage containers along the existing driveways;
The festival activities that are proposed to occur within the ALR represent a low likelihood of negative impacts to the agricultural capability of the land, or to adjacent agricultural operations. The activities involve only two temporary structures (checkpoint tent and toilet), and mainly use an existing driveway to provide access between the two stages. The adjacent farms and property owners have indicated their support for the festival.
Although the policies of the OCP describe suggested uses for lands designated Agriculture, in the absence of an implementing zoning bylaw, there are no permitted uses, thus from a zoning perspective, there is nothing to prohibit this type of use.
Action Plan / Communication Plan: Any comments and/or concerns will be forwarded to the ALC for their consideration. The property owner will be notified of the Board recommendation.
Attachments: Applicant’s Submission 2010 ALC Decision letter from 2009
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 225 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 226 of 408 Applicant's Submission
Applicant: Local Government: Land Under Application: Background: ^__ ^
Growth of the Festival under a 5 year plan:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 227 of 408 Applicant's Submission
Proposal: ^__
Bass Coast Project is proposing the following usage of ALR land: Bass Coast Project is proposing the following usage of land adjacent to ALR land: ` ` ` Potential Impact & Proposed Action Plan: o o o
1 *Scaffolding, Sound system, Lighting Erected by Rocky Mountain Production Services (25 years experience in the event industry with the latest in equipment technology http://www.rmps.ca/)
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 228 of 408 Applicant's Submission
o o o o o o o o o o Scope of Bass Coast Project: Current Use of Land:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 229 of 408 Applicant's Submission
j
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 230 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 231 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 232 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 233 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 234 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 235 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 236 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 237 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 238 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 239 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 240 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 241 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 242 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 243 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 244 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 245 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 246 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 247 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 248 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 249 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 250 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 251 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 252 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 253 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 254 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 255 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 256 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 257 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 258 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 259 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 260 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 261 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 262 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 263 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 264 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 265 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 266 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 267 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 268 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 269 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 270 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 271 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 272 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 273 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 274 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 275 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 276 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 277 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 278 of 408 #304 - 1353 Ellis Street, Kelowna BC V1Y 1Z9 Telephone: 250-762-2517 Fax: 250-763-5266
April 19, 2010 File: 1197.0000.00
Squamish-Lillooet Regional District P.O. Box 219, 1350 Aster Street Pemberton BC V0N 2L0
VIA EMAIL: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
Attention: Chair Russ Oakley, Area A Director, SLRD Director Dennis Bontron, Mayor, District of Lillooet Director Mickey Macri, Area B Director, SLRD
RE: SLRD Northern Areas
We would like to begin by thanking you for meeting with us in Kamloops earlier this month to discuss governance and structure in the northern areas of the SLRD. We appreciated the opportunity to discuss governance initiatives and to gain a better appreciation of the current issues facing Electoral Areas A and B, the District of Lillooet, and surrounding First Nations. As a result of this discussion and subsequent discussion with Paul Edgington, we have prepared the following work plan for your consideration.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Based on our discussions to date, we understand that the SLRD northern areas would like to undertake a study to review governance and structure options for the sub-region. The geographical scope of this study would include SLRD Electoral Area A, SLRD Electoral Area B, the District of Lillooet, and surrounding First Nations (i.e. the northern area St’at’imc Nation bands). In 2005, Urban Systems completed a review of incorporation feasibility for the Electoral Area A Upper Bridge River Valley area. However, it is understood that this specific area still does not meet the population or revenue thresholds required for incorporation.
Over the years, various discussions have taken place about governance and structure in the northern areas. As well, the SLRD is currently in the process of initiating a region-wide Governance and Boundaries Project. The intent of the SLRD project is: to identify issues related to governance, boundaries, and related matters; to identify key results if the problems identified are addressed; and, to identify options and recommendations for action moving forward. While the SLRD project would address the full region, we understand that there is an immediate desire to proceed with a study to review governance and structure in the northern areas. The northern areas face a number of unique issues, and this study will provide an opportunity to focus on these issues within the sub-regional context.
www.urban-systems.com CALGARY | EDMONTON | FORT ST. JOHN | KAMLOOPS | KELOWNA | NELSON | QUESNEL | RICHMOND
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 279 of 408 SLRD Northern Areas File: 1197.0000.00 April 19, 2010 Page 2
Based on our discussions, we understand that key northern area issues include the following:
- Economic development: Northern areas have been impacted by the cyclical decline of resource industries but there are also a number of economic development opportunities in areas such as tourism, outdoor recreation, energy resources, viticulture, renewed forestry and mining activity and more. A desire has been expressed for a co-ordinated approach to economic development in the sub-region.
- Revenue sharing: It was identified that revenue generation is an important consideration in the overall competitiveness of the northern areas. To increase opportunities for revenue generation, we understand that there is a desire to explore revenue sharing opportunities related to industrial developments in the area (e.g. Independent Power Projects).
- Capacity building and representation: Currently, the northern areas have two SLRD electoral area directors (from Areas A and B), and a Mayor and Council in Lillooet. Additionally, there are six First Nations communities in the immediate area, including the Bridge River Indian Band (Nxwisten), the Cayoose Creek Band (Se’k’welwas), the Seton Lake Band (Lh7us), the T’it’q’et Administration (formerly Lillooet Indian Band), the Ts’Kw’aylaxw First Nation (formerly Pavilion Indian Band), and the Xaxli’p First Nation (formerly Fountain Band). These First Nations comprise the Lillooet Tribal Council along with the Lil’wat First Nation (formerly Mount Currie Band Council), located further south at Mt. Currie, near the confluence of the Lillooet and Birkenhead Rivers. Given the relatively small population of the SLRD northern sub-region, there is an identified need to review how capacity can be built to address sub-regional issues. As well, the northern areas are distinct from other SLRD areas, and there is an expressed desire to review how the northern sub-region might best be represented politically, moving forward.
While these are the key issues that were identified in our early April meeting, we expect that other issues may arise as this study progresses. We understand that there is an identified desire to review potential new governance models and structures that could be implemented in the SLRD northern areas. Nevertheless, based on our discussions, we feel that a critical first step in the process will involve a listening and information-gathering process to review the current situation and to more deeply identify key areas of concern in the sub-region. This ‘situation-scan’ will provide the basis for identification of opportunities to address these key areas of concern. While some issues may be addressed on a sub-regional basis under current governance structures, we will also provide an initial exploration of the potential to address issues through changes to governance structures. In this latter stage of the study, we will review local government functions and identify how they might be delivered under different governance models. If warranted, detailed examination of various governance options would then take place in a subsequent restructure study or SLRD initiative.
www.urban-systems.com CALGARY | EDMONTON | FORT ST. JOHN | KAMLOOPS | KELOWNA | NELSON | QUESNEL | RICHMOND
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 280 of 408 SLRD Northern Areas File: 1197.0000.00 April 19, 2010 Page 3
Key study objectives are:
1. To outline the existing situation with respect to local government revenues and expenditures, services, and political representation. 2. To involve all governmental stakeholders, including First Nations, in a discussion of key issues related to the governance and structure of the SLRD. 3. To identify desired solutions and develop options to address the identified key issues within the current SLRD government structure (e.g. on a sub-regional basis). 4. To undertake a broad review of the potential for changes in governance and structure of the SLRD to address key issues. 5. To recommend governance models to be analyzed in further detail, as warranted, in a formal restructure study or SLRD initiative.
This work is being undertaken for the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District. We do not have the responsibility or the mandate to consider governance and structure issues for First Nations. However, it is recognized that any progress in addressing the above issues identified will require full participation with the St’at’imc if any success is to be realized.
WORK PLAN
To meet the overall study objectives, we have a prepared a four-phase work plan for your review and comment.
PHASE 1 – PROJECT INITIATION & KEY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
To initiate this study, we will travel to the SLRD northern areas and to Pemberton to conduct individual meetings with the following key stakeholders:
Z Mayor and CAO of the District of Lillooet Z Electoral Area A Director Z Electoral Area B Director Z Administrative/Political Representatives (to be identified by the above-noted SLRD board members) from: the Bridge River Indian Band (Nxwisten), the Cayoose Creek Band (Se’k’welwas), the Seton Lake Band (Lh7us), the T’it’q’et Administration (formerly Lillooet Indian Band), the Ts’Kw’aylaxw First Nation (formerly Pavilion Indian Band), and the Xaxli’p First Nation (formerly Fountain Band). As well, if desired we can make contact with adjacent First Nations such as the Lytton First Nation and the Bonaparte First Nation. Z CAO of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District and other key staff.
www.urban-systems.com CALGARY | EDMONTON | FORT ST. JOHN | KAMLOOPS | KELOWNA | NELSON | QUESNEL | RICHMOND
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 281 of 408 SLRD Northern Areas File: 1197.0000.00 April 19, 2010 Page 4
The goal of these meetings is to introduce the study, to gain a broader understanding of the study area and its issues, and to identify the aspirations of all key stakeholders as they relate to governance and the provision of services within the SLRD northern areas. To meet with all key stakeholders in the SLRD northern areas, we expect that we will require two to three full days in the Lillooet and Pemberton areas. As possible, we will travel to all northern electoral areas and First Nations offices to gain a comprehensive understanding of the study area.
In this project phase, we will also travel to Victoria to meet with representatives from the BC Ministry of Community and Rural Development’s Local Government Structure Branch, and potentially the local MLA. This visit is recommended to build support for any future detailed study of government structure in the SLRD northern areas. Our experience suggests that it is important to build a strong understanding and relationship with the Local Government Structure Branch. This visit will also provide us with an overview of any Provincial interests in this study.
PHASE 2 – DISCUSSION PAPER ON ISSUES AND OPTIONS
In this phase we will develop a succinct discussion paper to accomplish the following objectives:
Z Document baseline conditions, including: population; assessment base; property tax rates; BC Hydro taxes in lieu; services provided. We assume that this information will be made available by the Regional District, the District of Lillooet, and the BC Assessment Authority. Z Review the status of key industrial/utility projects such as Independent Power Projects, mining projects, etc. Z Document key issues as we understand them from the stakeholder interviews. Z Identify options to address key issues within the existing structure (e.g. on a sub-regional basis), and assess their implications. Z Identify the ability of various potential changes in governance and structure to address key issues. Z Review the experience of other notable communities (such as Atlin, Fort Nelson, and Fort St. John).
Electronic versions of this discussion paper will be provided to all key stakeholders prior to Phase 3.
PHASE 3 – REVIEW OPTIONS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS
Upon completion of the Phase 2 discussion paper, we will travel to Lillooet for a workshop discussion with a steering group of all key stakeholders that wish to attend. At this workshop, we will provide an overview of findings to date and facilitate a discussion on options to address key issues, including the ability of changes
www.urban-systems.com CALGARY | EDMONTON | FORT ST. JOHN | KAMLOOPS | KELOWNA | NELSON | QUESNEL | RICHMOND
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 282 of 408 SLRD Northern Areas File: 1197.0000.00 April 19, 2010 Page 5
in governance and structure to address these issues. As an outcome of this meeting, we expect to have direction on two to three governance options that will be presented in more detail in the final report.
We anticipate spending one full day in Lillooet for this workshop. Nevertheless, as an option at this stage, we would be pleased to conduct additional consultation through individual meetings with key stakeholders, or through additional workshops. If this additional consultation is desired, we will submit a budget for this task, and we will proceed once we have confirmed the scope and approach with you.
PHASE 4 – REVIEW GOVERNANCE ALTERNATIVES AND COMPILE FINAL REPORT
Based on the feedback received Phase 3, we will prepare an overview-level review of two to three governance options (in addition to the status quo) for the SLRD northern areas. This review will consider factors such as: population; assessment base; revenue sharing opportunities; ability to provide desired services; representation; costs and taxation. The analysis will primarily focus on thresholds required to support the identified potential changes to governance. A thorough review of revenues, expenditures, and taxation would occur in a subsequent, full restructure study.
Upon completion of this review, we will compile a draft report to summarize all issues and findings from this study. To review this draft, we assume that no travel will be required and that this review could take place by telephone or in our offices in Kelowna. Once all comments have been received, we will finalize the report and submit ten (10) hard copies of the report for distribution to the key stakeholders.
TEAM
This assignment will be completed by James Klukas, MCIP and Dan Huang, MCIP. James recently completed the Barriere and Clearwater Municipal Incorporation Studies, and in 2005 he completed the Incorporation Feasibility work for the Upper Bridge River Valley. Dan has completed a number of boundary extension and restructure studies, and he is a Principal at Urban Systems. Dave Morris and Steve Frith will act as senior advisors and reviewers for this study. Steve has worked throughout the SLRD and is President of Urban Systems. Dave served as Executive Director of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs in the 1990s and he has over 30 years of experience in local government and finance.
FEE ESTIMATE
Our fee estimate for this assignment is $29,500. Please note that this fee estimate includes all in-office disbursements and travel expenses, but it does not include GST/HST. The budget estimate is broken down by phase as follows:
www.urban-systems.com CALGARY | EDMONTON | FORT ST. JOHN | KAMLOOPS | KELOWNA | NELSON | QUESNEL | RICHMOND
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 283 of 408 SLRD Northern Areas File: 1197.0000.00 April 19, 2010 Page 6
Phase Estimated Budget Phase 1 – Project Initiation & Key Stakeholder Interviews: $12,000 Phase 2 – Discussion Paper on Issues & Opportunities: $8,500 Phase 3 – Review Options with Key Stakeholders: $3,400 Phase 4 – Review Governance Alternatives & Compile Final Report: $5,600 Total: $29,500 plus GST/HST
SCHEDULE
We are prepared to undertake this work right away, and expect to complete the assignment within four to six months of start-up.
SUMMARY
This work plan is customized to best address what we understand to be the key issues facing the SLRD northern areas. Nevertheless, to ensure that we meet your overall study objectives, we would be pleased to discuss any suggestions or questions that you might have. Please do not hesitate to contact us at 250-762- 2517. We look forward to working with you to move this project forward.
Sincerely, URBAN SYSTEMS LTD.
James Klukas, M.Pl, MCIP Dan Huang, M.U.R.P, MCIP Community Planner Community Planner / Principal
Cc: Paul Edgington, CAO, SLRD ([email protected]) Grant Loyer, CAO, District of Lillooet ([email protected]) Steve Frith, Urban Systems ([email protected]) Dave Morris, Urban Systems ([email protected])
U:\Projects_KAM\1197\0000\2010-04-19 LET SLRD Northern Areas Review.doc
www.urban-systems.com CALGARY | EDMONTON | FORT ST. JOHN | KAMLOOPS | KELOWNA | NELSON | QUESNEL | RICHMOND
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 284 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Minutes March 22, 2010; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Board: Russ Oakley (Area A); S. Gimse (Area C); M. Macri (Area B); J. Turner (Area D); P. Heintzman (Squamish); K. Melamed (Whistler); J. Sturdy (Pemberton); D. Bontron (Lillooet)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; S. Lafrance, Director of Finance; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)
Others: 4 members of the public and 1 member of the press.
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:31 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Allen McEwan from the Pemberton Wildlife Association be permitted as a delegation to speak to Item 6.1. CARRIED
3 Committee Reports and Recommendations
3.1 Committee of the Whole Recommendations of February 22, 2010:
2010 – 2014 Financial Plan Review
It was moved and seconded:
Feasibility Studies (1602) THAT the Feasibility Studies budget be approved as presented.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 285 of 408 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
Sea to Sky Economic Development (3101) THAT the Sea to Sky Economic Development budget be approved as presented.
Sea to Sky Trails (3004) THAT the Sea to Sky Trails budget be approved as presented.
911 South (1764) THAT the 911 South budget be approved as presented.
Land Planning & Zoning (1200) THAT the Land Planning & Zoning budget be approved as presented.
Regional Transit Planning & Infrastructure (3201) THAT the Regional Transit Planning & Infrastructure budget be approved as presented. CARRIED
3.2 Committee of the Whole Recommendations of March 8, 2010:
1. Tier 2 RSP Gas Tax Grant Agreement - Work plans 3b, 3c & 3d for Review/Consideration
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff contact UBCM to determine if they would consider an amendment to the agreement to pass administration of shelters, pullouts and lighting to the Village of Pemberton. CARRIED
2. Sunstone Ridge Neighbourhood Concept Plan – Terms of Reference
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 3.2.2.1, 3.2.2.2, and 3.2.2.4 be moved:
1. THAT the Regional Board endorse the attached Terms of Reference for processing the Sunstone Ridge Neighbourhood Concept Plan Official Community Plan Amendment / Rezoning Applications.
2. THAT the motion be amended by removing the dates from item 4 (Timeline) of the Terms of Reference.
4. THAT SLRD Committee of the Whole consultation be included in steps 12, 15, 17, and 20 of the timeline in the Terms of Reference.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 286 of 408 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
Opposed: Directors Melamed; Macri; Heintzman; Turner DEFEATED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff be directed to prepare a report on the development potential under existing zoning/OCP designation for the lands known as Sunstone Ridge.
Opposed: Director Bontron CARRIED
Director Melamed left the meeting at 11:18 AM and returned to the meeting at 11:23 AM.
3.3 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Recommendations of March 1, 2010:
1. Pemberton Water Park
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT the development of a cool down/ playground facility at the Cottonwood Centre be a high priority of the Pemberton & District Recreation Service.
2. THAT a larger water park be incorporated into long range recreation facility planning for the Pemberton & District Recreation Services.
3. THAT these projects proceed when sufficient funds for these projects have been generated, raised from alternative revenue sources.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
4. THAT a written confirmation be requested from the Village of Pemberton for finalization of the water park site and any costs associated with the construction of the water park.
Opposed: Director Sturdy CARRIED
2. Signal Hill School Playing Field Use Agreement
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 287 of 408 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
1. THAT the proposed agreement for booking and administration of the Signal Hill School Playing Fields be approved in principle with inclusion of a clause allowing for mutually agreed assignment of the agreement.
2. THAT a full cost recovery user fee system for playing field usage be developed.
3. THAT the agreement be referred to the Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee for information. CARRIED
3. Pemberton Valley Transit System (“PVTS”) Amendment to Public Transit Agreement and Public Transit Infrastructure Programme
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT the SLRD Board support an amendment of the agreement with UBCM and BC Transit with respect to the $48,500 allocated to the SLRD under the Public Transit Agreement and Public Transit Infrastructure Programme to provide for the said funds to be applied to the debt service obligations of the PVTS for the Pemberton-Whistler commuter bus, regardless of bus size or type; and
2. THAT the SLRD Board support the application for an extension of time to December 31, 2010 to complete the balance of works (pullouts and shelters) under the PTIP funding. CARRIED
4. Additional Recreation Advisory Committee Members
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the SLRD advertise for additional Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee members. CARRIED
5. Engineered Baseball Bleachers
It was moved and seconded
THAT a written update on the Engineered Baseball Bleachers at Signal Hill Elementary School be provided to the Recreation Advisory Committee.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 288 of 408 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
6. 2010 – 2014 Financial Plan Review
It was moved and seconded:
Pemberton Fire Truck Acquisition (1701) THAT the Pemberton Fire Truck Acquisition budget be approved as presented.
Library – Pemberton/Area C (2502) THAT the Pemberton/Area C Library budget be approved as presented.
Rescue Service – Pemberton/Area C (1702) THAT the Pemberton/Area C Rescue Service budget be approved as presented. CARRIED
7. Pemberton Skate Board Society – Funding Request
It was moved and seconded:
THAT $10,000 from Pemberton Recreation Commission funds be authorized to the Pemberton Skate Board Society; and that Electoral Area C and the Village of Pemberton be requested to match the funds.
CARRIED
3.4 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Recommendations of March 8, 2010:
2010 – 2014 Financial Plan Review
Pemberton/Area C Trails (3003)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton/Area Trails budget be approved as circulated.
CARRIED
Community Facility – Pemberton Recreation Centre (2106)
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 289 of 408 This is page 6 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
1. THAT the Pemberton Recreation Centre budget be approved.
2. THAT the committee consider further operational and financial changes in April, 2010. CARRIED
3.5 Electoral Area Directors Committee Recommendations of March 8, 2010:
1. Feasibility Study for Area B Identifying a Shared Fire Service with the Following: 1) Texas Creek and the District of Lillooet 2) Fountain Valley and Xaxlip Community (Fountain Band) 3) Pavilion Lake and Tskwaylaxw (Pavilion Band)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Feasibility Studies on the provision of fire protection service by adjacent jurisdictions be conducted on the following portions of Electoral Area B: 1) Texas Creek (from the District of Lillooet) 2) Fountain Valley (from Xaxlip Community (Fountain Band) ) 3) Pavilion Lake (from Tskwaylaxw Community)
with funds for these studies coming from the Feasibility Study Reserve.
CARRIED
2. Request for Subdivision in the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), Roland Wuschke, Airport Road, Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Board deny the application to subdivide the parcel legally described as Lot 1, DLs 205 & 259, LLD, Plan KAP59654, located at 1674 Airport Road, as submitted by Roland Wuschke, and not forward the application to the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC).
CARRIED
3. Gambier Island Local Trust Committee Proposed Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw No. 109
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 290 of 408 This is page 7 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT the Island Local Trust Committee be advised that with respect to their proposed Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 109, the interests of the SLRD are not affected, and no further consultation is necessary.
CARRIED
4. Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) Final Proposal Arbitration – Electoral Area Directors’ Participation
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff prepare a written submission for Electoral Area Directors consideration based upon Electoral Area Director representation.
CARRIED
5. Intermittent Telus Service – Bridge River Valley
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Telus be requested to:
1) Provide details of their plans to reduce and ultimately eliminate current service disruption and 2) Provide details on potential compensation to customers for service difficulties
AND THAT this request be copied to the Canadian Radio Television & Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). CARRIED
6. Area C Scholarship to Pemberton Secondary School
It was moved and seconded:
THAT $5000 be identified from Area C Select Services for provision of a $1000 per year scholarship, for a five year period for Pemberton Secondary School students residing in Electoral Area C; and that the criteria for the scholarship be developed based on the Village of Pemberton’s scholarship requirements. CARRIED
7. Village of Pemberton and SLRD Staff Meeting Regarding Emergency Planning
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 291 of 408 This is page 8 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT a joint Village of Pemberton and SLRD Elected Officials and Staff meeting be requested to discuss Emergency Management and other areas of mutual interest. CARRIED It was moved and seconded:
THAT meetings similar to the Village of Pemberton and the SLRD be held between neighbouring municipalities and Electoral Areas Elected Officials and Staff. CARRIED
4 Bylaws
4.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
4.1.1 Bylaw 1161 - Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, Amendment Bylaw No. 1161, 2010 - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan, Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the draft Bylaw 1161 - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan, Electoral Area C be referred to Staff to:
i) determine if commitments of consultant were met, and ii) that the policy components be identified and clarified into a more succinct bylaw. CARRIED
The meeting was recessed at 12:00 PM and was reconvened at 12:32 PM.
4.1.2 Bylaw 1179 - Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1179, 2010 - Building Bylaw – Climatic Data
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT Schedule ”B” to Bylaw 1179 be replaced with revised Schedule “B”; and
2. THAT Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1179, 2010 be adopted as amended.
CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 292 of 408 This is page 9 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
4.1.3 Bylaw 1185 – Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2010 – 2014 Financial Plan, By-law No. 1185-2010
Furry Creek Refuse Area (1908)
THAT the Furry Creek Refuse Area exhibit (1908) be amended by decreasing the Transfer to Reserve by $3000 and increasing Operating Expenses by $3000.
Amendment CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1185, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2010- 2014 Financial Plan, Bylaw No. 1185-201” be introduced and read a first, second and third time. CARRIED
2. THAT Bylaw No. 1185, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District 2010- 2014 Financial Plan, Bylaw No. 1185-2010” be adopted.
CARRIED
4.1.4 Bylaw 1186 - Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1186, 2010 - Rezoning at 7541 Linda Road; Electoral Area C
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT Bylaw No. 1186, cited as ‘Squamish Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1186, 2010’ be read a first time and referred to the Lil’wat Nation, Lower Stl’atl’imx Tribal Council, Village of Pemberton, and provincial agencies for comment.
2. THAT prior to scheduling a public hearing, the applicant provide confirmation from a qualified professional that an adequate supply of water is provided for each proposed parcel (a minimum of 2270 litres of water per day that meets the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality and is available on a sustained basis throughout the year).
CARRIED S. Lafrance left the meeting at 12:42 PM.
5 Staff Reports and Other Business
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 293 of 408 This is page 10 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
5.1 Unweighted Corporate Vote
5.1.1 Interior Health – Smoking Ban in Public Areas Policy
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the correspondence from Interior Health regarding Smoking Ban in Public Areas Policy be received. CARRIED
5.1.2 Regional Growth Strategy Dispute Resolution – Final Proposal Arbitration Next Steps
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT pursuant to section 861 (2) of the Local Government Act the Board confirm its selection of Glenn Sigurdson as arbitrator in the final proposal arbitration process for the SLRD Regional Growth Strategy.
2. THAT the District of Squamish be advised of the Board’s selection and be requested to confirm whether it is in agreement with this choice.
3. THAT the Regional Board formally confirm its participation in the final proposal arbitration process. CARRIED
5.1.3 Development Variance Permit # 86 - 1122 Copper Drive, Britannia Beach, Electoral Area D
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Board approve a Development Variance Permit for Lot 185, DL 4015, Gp1, NWD, Plan BCP25662 to vary the provisions of SLRD Zoning Bylaw No. 540, 1994 to permit the construction of a single family dwelling with a height of 10.17m, and that the issuance of the permit be authorized.
Opposed: Director Heintzman CARRIED
5.1.4 Black Tusk Helicopter, Electoral Area D, Echo Lake Accommodation
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Black Tusk Helicopter application regarding Echo Lake Accommodation be deferred for a 2 month period.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 294 of 408 This is page 11 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
5.1.5 Governance
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff prepare and issue a Request for Proposal for consulting services for elected officials and community engagement in the Issues & Outcomes Identification component of the Governance Project.
CARRIED
5.1.6 Committee of the Whole Meetings
5.1.7 Managing Forest Fuels in the Wildland Urban Interface Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Managing Forest Fuels in the Wildland Urban Interface report be received. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff look at fuel mitigation projects in Electoral Area B and proceed with implementation as soon as possible.
Opposed: Directors Gimse and Heintzman CARRIED
5.1.8 Emergency Response Plan Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Emergency Response Plan report be received for information.
CARRIED
S. Olmstead left the meeting at 1:52 PM.
6 Correspondence Requesting Action
6.1 Stewardship Pemberton Society – Request for Support
Allen McEwan, Secretary of the Pemberton Wildlife Association, addressed the Board regarding request for support.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 295 of 408 This is page 12 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
Resolution to move In-Camera
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Board move In-Camera under the authority of Section 90 (1) (e) (o) of the Community Charter and the meeting be closed to persons other than Board members, Staff and Mr. McEwan due to discussion of a land acquisition matter.
CARRIED
The meeting was closed to the public at 2:05 PM. The meeting was re-opened to the public at 2:22 PM.
7 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 7.1 to 7.3 be confirmed as circulated:
7.1 Regular Board Meeting Minutes – February 22, 2010
7.2 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – February 22, 2010
7.3 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes – March 8, 2010
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 7.4 to 7.9 be received for information:
7.4 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes – March 8, 2010
7.5 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – March 1, 2010
7.6 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes – March 8, 2010
7.7 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes – February 23, 2010
7.8 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes – March 1, 2010
7.9 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes – March 9, 2010
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 296 of 408 This is page 13 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
8 Business Arising from the Minutes
9 Correspondence for Information
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 9.1 to 9.5 be received for information:
9.1 Ministry of Community & Rural Development – Status of Regional Growth Strategy
9.2 Ministry of Public Safety & Solicitor General – PRIME BC User Fee
9.3 Fraser Basin Council – Thompson Regional Committee Meetings
9.4 Lillooet Restoration Society – Powerhouse Restoration Project
9.5 UBCM – 2009 Resolutions CARRIED
10 Delegations and Petitions
11 Decision on Late Business
12 Late Business
12.1 Federation of Canadian Municipalities Board of Directors Election
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Board support the nomination of Director Susan Gimse for membership on the Board of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
CARRIED
13 Directors’ Reports
14 Board In-Camera Meeting
Resolution to move In-Camera
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Board move In-Camera under the authority of Section 90 (1) (a) of the Community Charter.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 297 of 408 This is page 14 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regular Board meeting, held on March 22, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
CARRIED
The meeting was closed to the public at 2:34 PM, and was re-opened to the public at 4:49 PM.
15 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 4:50 PM.
Russ Oakley Leslie E. Lloyd Chair Secretary
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 298 of 408 Committee of the Whole Meeting Minutes April 12, 2010; 12:30 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: R. Oakley (Area A); S. Gimse (Area C); J. Turner (Area D); M. Macri (Area B); K. Melamed (Whistler); G. Gardner (Squamish); P. Heintzman (Squamish); J. Sturdy (Pemberton)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; P. DeJong, Research & Policy Analyst; L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services (Recording Secretary)
Others: 1 member of the public and 1 member of the press
1 Call to Order
2 Approval of Agenda
3 New Business
3.1 Metro Vancouver RGS – Lee Ann Garnett, Senior Regional Planner, Metro Vancouver Regional District
Presentation of Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy
3.2 Regional Transit – Manuel Achadinha, President/CEO; Steve New, Vice President/COO; Peter Rantucci, Director Regional Transit Systems , BC Transit
Discussion regarding regional transit
4 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 PM
Russ Oakley Chair
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 299 of 408 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2010; 10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: R. Oakley (Area A); S. Gimse (Area C); J. Turner (Area D); M. Macri (Area B)
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services (Recording Secretary); S. Olmstead, Director of Planning & Development Services; P. DeJong, Research & Policy Analyst; B. Hernandez, Building Inspector
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:31 AM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following were added to the agenda:
3.14 Emergency Program Manager Job Description 3.15 Signage at Furry Creek Golf Course 3.16 Cemetery - D’Arcy/Devine area
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended.
CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 Non-Farm Use in the ALR Squamish Valley, Area D Bass Coast Music Festival
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT the request for reconsideration of the application for a non-farm use in the ALR, submitted by Bass Coast Projects Ltd. in 2009 for the lands legally described as DL 994, NWD to allow the festival for 4 days per year, on an annual basis, be forwarded to the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) with a recommendation of support on the condition that the festival remain in substantial compliance with the proposal submitted in 2009.
2. THAT a new application be submitted for consideration by the SLRD and ALC if the festival is no longer in substantial compliance with the proposal as submitted in 2009. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 300 of 408 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
3.2 Sea-to-Sky Air Quality Management Plan Financial Contribution for 2010
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the SLRD Board continue to fund the Sea-to-Sky Air Quality Management Plan and authorize a cash contribution of $659 for 2010. CARRIED
3.3 Village of Pemberton Referral of OCP and Zoning Amendment Applications
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Village of Pemberton be advised that with respect to their proposed zoning and OCP amendment, the interests of the SLRD are not affected, and no further consultation is necessary, however, the application itself has technical details that need to be addressed by the Village of Pemberton. CARRIED
Belinda Hernandez entered the meeting at 11:00 AM
3.4 Building Permit Fees
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1187, 2010 be introduced and read a first, second and third time.
2. THAT Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Bylaw No. 863, 2003, Amendment Bylaw No. 1187, 2010 be adopted.
3. THAT the Building Permit Construction Value Policy dated March 30, 2010 be endorsed.
CARRIED
Belinda Hernandez left the meeting at 11:10 AM
3.5 Regional Growth Strategy Area Directors Final Proposal Arbitration Representation
It was moved and seconded:
1. THAT the Electoral Area Directors Committee supports the draft Joint Statement Regarding Arbitration of the Regional Growth Strategy, Bylaw No. 1062, 2008 at second reading, cited as “Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1062, 2008” be acknowledged by adding a signature block on the statement for signature by the Electoral Area Directors Committee. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 301 of 408 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
It was moved and seconded:
2. THAT staff prepare a written response on the Regional Growth Strategy for submission to the Arbitrator based upon the October 2009 Electoral Area Directors Committee recommendation. CARRIED
Peter DeJong entered the meeting at 11:36 AM
3.6 Noisy Boat Signs at Anderson Lake and Gates Lake
It was moved and seconded:
THAT $500 be authorized from Area C Select Funds to purchase Noisy Boat Bylaw signs for Anderson Lake and Gates Lake. CARRIED
3.7 911 South Update
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the 9-1-1- South Update Information Report be received for information.
CARRIED
Peter DeJong left the meeting at 11:45 AM
3.8 Foreshore Erosion at Furry Creek
It was moved and seconded:
THAT staff be directed to investigate options, including costs, for addressing foreshore erosion at Furry Creek and prepare a report to the Electoral Area Directors Committee. CARRIED
3.9 Governance and Boundaries Project – Issue Identification
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Governance and Boundaries Project – Issue Identification be referred to the next Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting as the first item on the agenda.
CARRIED
3.10 Electoral Area B Bylaw Enforcement Update
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 302 of 408 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT the Pavilion Lake Bylaw Enforcement Issue Information Report be received for information.
CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 3.11 to 3.13 be received for information.
3.11 March Monthly Building Report
3.12 Select Services Report
3.13 2010 BC Hydro Grant Allocation Information CARRIED
3.14 Emergency Program Manager Job Description
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Emergency Program Manager Job Description be referred to an Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting at 10:00 AM April 26, 2010 prior to the SLRD Regular Board meeting. CARRIED
3.15 Signage at Furry Creek Golf Course
3.16 Cemetery – D’Arcy/Devine Area
It was moved and seconded:
THAT staff prepare a report to the Electoral Area Directors Committee with respect to the establishment of a cemetery in the D’Arcy/Devine area. CARRIED
4 Correspondence
4.1 In-SHUCK-ch Nation – Request for Funding In-SHUCK-ch Days
It was moved and seconded:
THAT $250 from each of Areas A, B, C, D Select Funds, for a total of $1,000, be authorized to In-SHUCK-ch Nation for In-SHUCK-ch Days. CARRIED
4.2 Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation – Request for Letter of Support
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 303 of 408 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
1. THAT the Board provide a letter of support to Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation for their BC Capacity Initiative – Community Comprehensive Plan Phase II proposal, and
2. THAT the Board direct staff to explore with Ts’kw’aylaxw First Nation what specifically they are requesting in the way of technical support and advice as an in kind contribution valued at $3,500.
CARRIED
4.3 Pemberton Farmers Market – Request for Funding
It was moved and seconded:
THAT that Pemberton Farmers Market request for funding be referred to the Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission for their consideration. CARRIED
5 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
5.1 March 8, 2010 Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March 8, 2010 Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting minutes be approved as circulated. CARRIED
6 Business Arising from the Minutes
7 Termination
The meeting was adjourned at 12:09 PM
Russ Oakley Chair
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 304 of 408 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes April 12, 2010; 3:00 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: J. Sturdy (Presiding Chair); S. Gimse; M. Blundell; L. Ames
Staff: P. Edgington, CAO; L. Brown, Recreation Facility Supervisor; P. DeJong, Research & Policy Analyst; L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services (Recording Secretary); A. Macdonald, Open Spaces Coordinator; G. Pross, Program Leader/Supervisor
Others: D. Sailland, CAO, Village of Pemberton; 4 members of the public
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 3:00 PM
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved. CARRIED
3 New Business
3.1 Pemberton Recreation Centre Budget
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Recreation Centre Budget be considered out of sequence and moved to coincide with item 3.9. CARRIED 3.2 Old Pemberton Community Centre Structural Review Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Old Pemberton Community Centre Structural Review Report be received as information. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 305 of 408 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
3.3 Pemberton Valley Seniors Society – Request for Letter of Support
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee prepare a support letter to the Pemberton Valley Seniors Society for inclusion in their application to New Horizon for Seniors – Community Participation & Leadership Grant Program; and
THAT room rental fees at the Pemberton & District Community Centre be waived for the Pemberton Valley Seniors Society programs under the New Horizons Programme. CARRIED
3.4 Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee support adoption of the Pemberton/Area C Trails Master Plan with consequential amendments to update and correct dated information. CARRIED Daniel Sailland, CAO, Village of Pemberton entered the meeting at 3:39 PM
Allison Macdonald left the meeting at 3:49 PM
3.5 Pemberton Valley Transit Annual Operating Agreement (AOA)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee recommend that:
1. The Village of Pemberton (the “Village”) be requested to: a. agree to the conditions for Annual Operating Agreement (“AOA”) approval requested by the Lil’Wat Nation; b. approve and execute the Transit Cost Sharing Agreement covering expenses up to Sept.30/10; c. support the SLRD Board approving the 6 month AOA running Apr.1- Sept.30/10.
2. The Village of Pemberton be requested to: a. pass a resolution requesting that UBCM draft an amendment to the Tier 2 and PTIP grant agreements in order to allow the Village to take
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 306 of 408 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
over the direct administration of these grants and the works to be constructed under them for the geographical area comprising the Village of Pemberton and all Lil’Wat Nation IR Lands serviced by the PVTS, at such locations as the Village of Pemberton and the Lil’Wat Nation deem appropriate; and b. seek the consent of the SLRD Board pursuant to s.13(1)(b) of the Community Charter to undertake public transit infrastructure works outside its municipal boundaries.
3. The PVUS Committee recommend that the SLRD Board: a. approve the AOA as amended for Apr.1-Sept.30/10; b. approve the Public Transit Cost Sharing Agreement through Sept.30/10; and c. adopt a Service Establishment Bylaw for the Pemberton Valley Transit System; all contingent upon: (i) the adoption of recommendations 1 and 2 by the Village of Pemberton; (ii) written notice of the acceptance by UBCM of the proposed amendments to the Tier 2 and PTIP grant agreements, as requested by the Lil’Wat Nation; and (iii) written notice of the acceptance by BC Transit that the Service Review will be completed by June 30, 2010, as required by the Lil’Wat Nation. CARRIED
Peter DeJong left the meeting at 4:10 PM
3.8 Pemberton Transfer Station - Adjustment of Hours Considered out of sequence
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Pemberton Transfer Station Adjustment of Hours Information Report be received for information. CARRIED
Allison Macdonald entered the meeting at 4:12 PM
4.1 Pemberton Valley Trails Association – Request for Funding Considered out of sequence. Mr. Hugh Naylor in attendance as a Delegation
It was moved and seconded:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 307 of 408 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT the Pemberton Valley Trails Association Request for Funding be referred to staff to prepare a report to the Board with recommendations as to how the request may fit within the Regional Trails System [Sea to Sky Service]. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 3.6 and 3.7 be received for information.
3.6 Recreation Department Facilities’ Monthly Operating Budget
3.7 Recreation Department March Monthly Report CARRIED Geoff Pross entered the meeting at 4:46 PM
Discussion regarding the Youth Centre.
Staff will prepare a report regarding the Youth Centre for the May 10, 2010 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting.
Geoff Pross left the meeting at 5:21 PM
3.8 Pemberton Transfer Station - Adjustment of Hours Considered earlier.
3.9 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Recommendations of March 23, 2010:
It was moved and seconded:
THAT staff request a copy of the Everybody Active Final Report be submitted to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting for the May 10, 2010 meeting CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 3.9.1 to 3.9.5 be referred to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee May 10, 2010 meeting, these being:
1. Delegation: Bettina Falloon and Jill Brooksbank, Village of Pemberton – Presentation of Everybody Active Final Report 1. THAT the Recreation Advisory Committee accept the Everybody Active recommendations and see an ongoing need for Community Centre Staff
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 308 of 408 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
restructuring to implement the following recommendations: i) THAT the policies and programme recommendations be reviewed by the Community Centre Staff and the Recreation Advisory Committee with a view to address the barriers that are in place that prevent or limit opportunities to participate in programs (i.e.: cost, establishing subsidies, child minding etc.). ii) THAT the Healthy Living Committee be continued and community and recreation leader be asked to commit to their continued involvement and support. iii) THAT the Community Centre Staff in cooperation with the Recreation Advisory Committee develop and implement a plan that will enable low income community members opportunities to participate in community centre programmes. iv) THAT the sample Campbell River Walking Trails map be forwarded to the SLRD Open Spaces and Trails Coordinator and the PVTA for review and consideration for inclusion in any upcoming mapping projects. v) THAT the Community Centre Staff investigate and apply for funding through the WalkBC Grant program with an aim to implement a programme for 2011. vi) THAT the Community Centre Staff investigate the possibility of implementing a Recreation Assistance Programme similar to the one established by Campbell River; AND THAT a report on Recreation Assistance Programmes be presented to PVUS and the Recreation Advisory Committee for review and comment.
2. AND THAT an action plan for a walking programme be implemented immediately by existing Community Centre Staff.
2. Signal Hill School Playing Field Use Agreement 1. THAT the proposed Field Use Fee Structure be provided to the Recreation Advisory Committee for review prior to adoption.
2. THAT Staff investigate a fee structure that encourages youth use at low to no cost.
3. Recreation Budget in Pemberton 1. THAT the Village of Pemberton put forward a proposal to administer recreation in Pemberton.
2. THAT the Village of Pemberton continue to take the necessary steps to expand the Village of Pemberton’s boundary to include all of Electoral Area C for tax revenues.
Note: any wage or salary scale components should be discussed In-Camera, as
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 309 of 408 This is page 6 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
per Section 90 (1) (c) of the Community Charter 3. THAT the following positions: i) A full-time Recreation Services Manager ii) A full-time Recreation Programmer iii) A full-time Facility Booking Coordinator iv) A full-time Facility Maintenance person v) A full-time Facility Assistant vi) A part-time Recreation Receptionist, and vii) A part-time Youth Programmer
be created at the Pemberton Community Centre.
AND THAT all of these positions’ total salary and benefits could be covered under existing salary costs.
4. Additional Recreation Advisory Committee Members THAT the Recreation Advisory Committee (RAC) be provided input on all 5 additional members before their acceptance on the RAC committee.
5. Amending Bylaw 1111 THAT new Recreation Advisory Committee members be required to commit to attending 8 Recreation Advisory Committee meetings per year.
CARRIED
4 Correspondence
4.1 Pemberton Valley Trails Association – Request for Funding Considered earlier.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT items 4.2 to 6.0 be referred to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee May 10, 2010 meeting. CARRIED
4.2 Pemberton Baseball Association – Request for Funding
4.3 Jan Naylor - Misuse of Trails
4.4 Village of Pemberton - Pemberton Skate Board Park
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 310 of 408 This is page 7 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting, held on April 12, 2010 in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
5 Minutes
5.1 March 8, 2010 Pemberton Valley Utilities and Community Services Meeting Minutes
5.2 March 23, 2010 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
6 Committee In-Camera Meeting
7 Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 5:32 PM
Jordan Sturdy Presiding Chair
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 311 of 408 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes March 23, 2010; 6:30 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: J. MacKenzie; L. May; A. Crowley
Staff: S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)
Others: B. Falloon and J. Brooksbank (Village of Pemberton); and 1 member of the Public
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 6:45 PM.
2 Approval of Agenda
The following were added to the Agenda:
4.3 Incorporating Dialogue/Background into Recreation Advisory Committee Minutes on Recommendations Sent to Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee 4.4 Recreation Budget in Pemberton 4.5 Additional Recreation Advisory Committee Members 4.6 Amending Bylaw 1111
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED
3 Previous Recommendations to the Pemberton Valley Utilities and Services Committee:
1. Engineered Baseball Bleachers 2. SLRD direction on additional Recreation Advisory Committee Members 3. Pemberton Recreation Centre Budget Items
4 New Business
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 312 of 408 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton /Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting, held on March 23, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
4.1 Delegation: Bettina Falloon and Jill Brooksbank, Village of Pemberton – Presentation of Everybody Active Final Report
J. Brooksbank gave a synopsis of the Everybody Active Programme and summarized the survey findings. B. Falloon went over the report’s recommendations. The Recreation Advisory Committee thought there was a need for a Recreation Manager and a Recreation Programmer to follow-through on these recommendations.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee:
1. THAT the Recreation Advisory Committee accept the Everybody Active recommendations and see an ongoing need for Community Centre Staff restructuring to implement the following recommendations (2, 3, 4, 6, 7 , & 8 from the report): i) THAT the policies and programme recommendations be reviewed by the Community Centre Staff and the Recreation Advisory Committee with a view to address the barriers that are in place that prevent or limit opportunities to participate in programs (i.e.: cost, establishing subsidies, child minding etc.). ii) THAT the Healthy Living Committee be continued and community and recreation leader be asked to commit to their continued involvement and support. iii) THAT the Community Centre Staff in cooperation with the Recreation Advisory Committee develop and implement a plan that will enable low income community members opportunities to participate in community centre programmes. iv) THAT the sample Campbell River Walking Trails map be forwarded to the SLRD Open Spaces and Trails Coordinator and the PVTA for review and consideration for inclusion in any upcoming mapping projects. v) THAT the Community Centre Staff investigate and apply for funding through the WalkBC Grant program with an aim to implement a programme for 2011. vi) THAT the Community Centre Staff investigate the possibility of implementing a Recreation Assistance Programme similar to the one established by Campbell River; AND THAT a report on Recreation Assistance Programmes be presented to PVUS and the Recreation Advisory Committee for review and comment.
2. AND THAT an action plan for a walking programme be implemented immediately by existing Community Centre Staff. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 313 of 408 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton /Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting, held on March 23, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
B. Falloon and J. Brooksbank left the meeting at 8:00 PM.
4.2 Signal Hill School Playing Field Use Agreement
Discussion of user fees and cleaning fees: Are these fees based on usage or 7 days/week maximum use?
Feedback and discussion on user fees for different groups will be needed. A full-cost recovery system would be a disadvantage to youths in the Community. The Recreation Advisory Committee felt it would be more helpful if they had received this information before it was passed.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee:
1. THAT the proposed Field Use Fee Structure be provided to the Recreation Advisory Committee for review prior to adoption.
2. THAT Staff investigate a fee structure that encourages youth use at low to no cost. CARRIED
4.3 Incorporating Dialogue/Background into Recreation Advisory Committee Minutes on Recommendations Sent to Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee
4.4 Recreation Budget in Pemberton
The committee discussed Staffing costs, operating costs, revenue, and debt servicing of the Community Centre. There is a need to increase the tax base in Pemberton through boundary expansion. The Village of Pemberton needs to administer recreation in Pemberton.
In order for Recreation to be successful in Pemberton, the following 3 Steps are needed:
THAT it be recommended to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee:
1. THAT the Village of Pemberton put forward a proposal to administer recreation in Pemberton.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 314 of 408 This is page 4 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton /Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting, held on March 23, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
2. THAT the Village of Pemberton continue to take the necessary steps to expand the Village of Pemberton’s boundary to include all of Electoral Area C for tax revenues.
After reviewing the current budget, the Recreation Advisory Committee recognized that a restructuring of the current recreation Staff is possible under the current allocated salaries. The roles and responsibilities would be defined in the restructuring process.
3. THAT the following positions: i) A full-time Recreation Services Manager ii) A full-time Recreation Programmer iii) A full-time Facility Booking Coordinator iv) A full-time Facility Maintenance person v) A full-time Facility Assistant vi) A part-time Recreation Receptionist, and vii)A part-time Youth Programmer
be created at the Pemberton Community Centre.
AND THAT all of these positions’ total salary and benefits could be covered under existing salary costs. CARRIED
4.5 Additional Recreation Advisory Committee Members
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee:
THAT the Recreation Advisory Committee (RAC) be provided input on all 5 additional members before their acceptance on the RAC committee.
CARRIED
4.6 Amending Bylaw 1111
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 315 of 408 This is page 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton /Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting, held on March 23, 2010, in the SLRD Boardroom, 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC.
THAT new Recreation Advisory Committee members be required to commit to attending 8 Recreation Advisory Committee meetings per year.
CARRIED
5 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
5.1 February 23, 2010 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the February 23, 2010 Pemberton/Area C Recreation Advisory Committee meeting minutes be confirmed as circulated. CARRIED
5.2 March 1, 2010 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes
The March 1, 2010 and March 8, 2010 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee meeting minutes were received for information.
5.3 March 8, 2010 Pemberton Valley Utilities & Services Committee Meeting Minutes
6 Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 PM.
Judith MacKenzie Chair
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 316 of 408 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010; 9:00 AM Pemberton Community Centre 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance:
Committee: A. Helmer; J. Sturdy; M. Blundell; L. Ames; P. Vacirca; L. Lundy
Staff: L. Lloyd, Director of Administrative Services; S. Cheng, Administrative Assistant (Recording Secretary)
Others:
1 Call To Order
The meeting was called to order at 9:12 AM
2 Approval of Agenda
By consensus, item 3.2 – Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Website was considered first on the agenda.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as amended. CARRIED
3 New Business
3.2 Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Website
L. Lundy joined the meeting at 9:17 AM.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Custom Fit Communication’s invoice for $6778.91 be referred back to Custom Fit Communications. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded:
THAT Staff provide a clear explanation of the administrative and legislative
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 317 of 408 This is page 2 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton /Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission meeting, held on March 24, 2010 in the Pemberton Community Centre, 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
process for extending the Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Commission service into future years, and prepare a report for the next Economic Development Commission meeting. CARRIED
It was moved and seconded
THAT the SLRD determine if Staff are available for approximately 5 hours per month for administration of the Economic Development website and if so, provide a cost estimate at the next Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Commission meeting. CARRIED
3.1 Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Service Budget Update
3.2 Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Website Considered earlier in the meeting
3.3 Marketing Strategy
3.4 Additional Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Members
It was moved and seconded:
THAT a letter be sent to Mt. Currie requesting a replacement member to the Pemberton/Area C Economic Development Commission by April 9, 2010.
CARRIED
4 Minutes
4.1 March 9, 2010 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission Meeting Minutes
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March 9, 2010 Pemberton/Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission meeting minutes be approved as circulated. CARRIED
5 Termination
Next meeting: April 12, 2010 at 9 AM.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 318 of 408 This is page 3 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Pemberton /Area C 2010 Economic Development Commission meeting, held on March 24, 2010 in the Pemberton Community Centre, 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:16 AM.
Anna Helmer Chair
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 319 of 408 SQUAMISH-LILLOOET REGIONAL DISTRICT
Minutes of a Public Hearing for Bylaws 1162 and 1163 convened by the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board, held in the Pemberton Community Centre, 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC, on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM.
Present were: Area C Director Susan Gimse (Chair); K. Needham, Planner; S. Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development; Recording Secretary S. Cheng, and approximately 80 members of the public.
CALL TO ORDER Director Gimse called the Public Hearing to order at 7:06 PM.
CHAIR’S Good Evening Everyone. I’m Susan Gimse, and as Electoral Area ‘C’ COMMENTS Director for the Squamish Lillooet Regional District Board, I have been asked to chair this public hearing. With me are: Steven Olmstead, Director of Planning and Development and Kim Needham, SLRD Strategy Planner. On my right is Susan Cheng, who will be recording your comments. A couple of Board members are also here tonight: Ken Melamed, the mayor of Whistler, and Patty Heintzman, councillor from the District of Squamish. Lisa Ames, Councillor from the Village of Pemberton is also here, and Jordan Sturdy may attend.
This public hearing is convened pursuant to Section 890 of the Local Government Act to allow the public to make representations to the Board respecting matters contained in the proposed:
Bylaw No. 1162, 2009, cited as Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 Amendment Bylaw No. 1162, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge) ; and
Bylaw No. 1163, 2009, cited Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1163, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge)
This Bylaw was advertised in the March 18th and 25th, 2010 issues of the Pique Newsmagazine.
Every one of you present who believes that your interest in property is affected by the proposed bylaw shall be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard or to present written submissions respecting matters contained in the proposed bylaw. None of you will be discouraged or prevented from making your views known. However, it is important that you restrict your remarks to matters contained in the proposed bylaw.
It is your right to have a reasonable opportunity to have your submission heard. Recording devices are not banned from this public hearing, however, if you believe that your right to be heard is being interfered
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 320 of 408 This is Page 2 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
with because of the use of recording devices, you may request that video cameras or other recording devices be turned off or covered during your presentation. We request that all cell phones be turned off during this public hearing.
When speaking please address the Chair and commence your remarks by clearly stating your name and address.
Members of the Board may, if they so wish, ask questions following a presentation. However, the function of Board representatives at this public hearing is to listen rather than to debate the merits of the proposed bylaw.
After this public hearing has concluded, the Board may, without further notice or hearing, adopt or defeat the bylaw, or alter and then adopt the bylaw, provided that the alteration does not alter the use or increase the density.
May I remind you that tonight is your opportunity for input on the Bylaw and that after the conclusion of this hearing, no further public comments can be received.
At this point, I will turn it over to Kim Needham, to introduce bylaws 1162 and 1163:
Bylaw No. 1162, 2009, cited as Electoral Area C Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 689, 1999 Amendment Bylaw No. 1162, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge) ; and
Bylaw No. 1163, 2009, cited Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw 765, 2002, Amendment Bylaw No. 1163, 2009 (Copperdome Lodge)
Kim Needham Ms. Needham gave an overview of Bylaws 1162 and 1163: Bylaw 1162 Planner amends Official Community Plan Bylaw 689 – 1999 by re-designating Lot 1, DL 179, LLD plan 8954; and Parcel M (Plan B5692) of DL 179, LLD from Agriculture to Commercial; Bylaw 1163 amends Electoral Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002, by rezoning Lot 1, DL 179, LLD Plan 8954; and Parcel M (Plan B5692) of DL 179, LLD from Agriculture to a new Tourist Commercial 6 (TC6) Sub Zone.
Ms. Needham gave a history of the property. Bylaw 1163 is to legitimize the current use of the property, and Bylaw 1162 re-designates the land from Agriculture to Commercial. Comments and correspondence to date were summarized: there were 4 original letters; 27 form letters and a 68 signature petition in support of the bylaws.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 321 of 408 This is Page 3 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
There were 28 original letters (not including letters submitted tonight); 12 form letters; and no petition signed in opposition to the bylaws. There were two agency comments received from referrals which Steve Olmstead will read.
WRITTEN Mr. Olmstead read the two agency letters received: SUBMISSIONS 1. March 19, 2010 Agricultural Land Commission letter:
Re: Electoral Area C Official Community Plan (OCP) Amendment Bylaw 1162 This is in response to the referral of Bylaw 1162 for comment by the Provincial Agricultural Land Commission (the “Commission”). In reviewing its files the Commission notes that it endorsed the OCP, based in part on the fact that the OCP was on balance farm- friendly. Specifically, OCP policy 6.6 states that alternative non- agricultural sites should be considered when recreational, institutional, industrial, commercial uses or utility facilities are proposed for agricultural areas. Bylaw1162 proposes a commercial use for an agricultural area. The Commission notes that the specific site consists of adjoining parcels which are excepted under section 23 of the Agricultural Land Commission Act ( the “Act”), but that the area is in the agricultural land reserve (ALR) and the site is surrounded by agricultural land.
OCP policy 6.25 lists matters to be addressed in an agricultural impact assessment in order to measure the impacts on the ALR or farmed lands of a proposed major rezoning or non - farm use and identify impacts requiring mitigation. The material sent to this office accompanying a copy of Bylaw 1162 did not refer to an agricultural impact assessment. The proposal to legitimize a lodge or hotel within the Seed Potato Control Area would appear to be a candidate for an agricultural impact assessment.
Yours truly, PROVINCIAL AGRICULTURAL LAND COMMISSION Tony Pellett, Regional Planner
2. March 26, 2010 Ministry of Agriculture Letter:
Re: Copperdome Lodge rezoning application
I am writing to offer a few comments regarding the proposed re-
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 322 of 408 This is Page 4 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
zoning application for Copperdome Lodge.
This proposed re-zoning may be problematic, as a hotel is a conflicting non-farm use to agriculture within the Agriculture Land Reserve (ALR) and could serve to have a deleterious impact on current and future farming activities.
There are many problems that arise from conflicting non-farm uses within farming areas, including traffic, trespass, garbage on fields and other disturbances to farmers. Also, very importantly, non-farm users, such as recreational users, or in this case, hotel property owners, can object to the noise, dust, odor and other nuisances that arise from carrying on normal farm activities.
Whereas farmers are given protection against nuisance complaints from neighbors under the Right- to-Farm legislation, decisions by the Farm Industry Review Board show that there is often some mediation required between the farmer and the complainant. In some cases, such consideration for sensitive neighbors may have a deleterious effect on the profitability of the farming operation. In other cases, it may have the unintended consequence over the long term of limiting the intensification or expansion of surrounding farming operations. It is desirable that farmers have the opportunity to change, expand and intensify their farm businesses as they need to, in order to remain prosperous. Conflicting non-farm use in the ALR, can, in effect, reduce agriculture opportunity with respect to some economically favorable types of agriculture.
Currently, some of the farmland around the proposed application is used for seed potato production. Activities such as the dust and noise from land cultivation, the spraying of pesticides and the harvesting of potatoes may become the source of nuisance complaints. In future, the farmers may be carrying on other types of agriculture, as will be profitable at that time, and the farm practices associated with new crops or livestock activities could also become the source of complaints.
The first draft of the Land Use Inventory by the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands is not yet publically available; however, preliminary analysis of the data shows that conflicting non-farm uses, particularly recreational uses, in some parts of the ALR may be limiting the agriculture opportunity on the agriculture land surrounding the non-farm use.
Pemberton has a rich agriculture heritage that is held not only in its soils, excellent water resources and good climate, but also in its
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 323 of 408 This is Page 5 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
farming families. It has a unique and valuable niche in the current commercial agriculture production system with its seed potato production. Agriculture is an important, long term and steady, primary economic driver for Pemberton. Pemberton, as a food production zone, is likely to become even more valuable in future, growing possibly a wider diversification of crops as the demand for food grows higher with our growing world population. It is important, in this context, that the agriculture production capacity of Pemberton be strengthened, including the preservation and improvement of its land and water resources, and that its farming community is supported in their endeavors to run prosperous businesses.
Yours truly, Kim Sutherland, MSc., P.Ag. Regional Agrologist, Coastal Region
See Attached Summary of All Written Submissions
PUBLIC Chair Gimse explained what to expect of the public hearing, requesting COMMENTS that comments be respectful and be kept brief so that everyone will be given an opportunity to speak. Chair Gimse invited the proponent to speak, then opened the floor to public comments.
Ian Porter Mr. Porter summarized the user groups for Copperdome Lodge: SFU; (Proponent) UBC; TRU; the German Academy. The Bylaw is to legitimize the Pemberton/ currents uses and to expand the tourism uses. It is not a hotel and has Vancouver not been operated as a hotel. This is a one-off situation and therefore will not set a precedent; it won’t change the use of other small agricultural parcels.
There have been no complaints from adjacent property owners regarding agricultural issues. There is no meaningful risk to bio security.
Brenda McLeod Ms. McLeod, Chair of the Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee AAC Chair (AAC) read from her letter which stated:
Agricultural Advisory Committees in British Columbia play an important role connecting farming, farms, and farmers to the rest of a community. The role of an Agricultural Advisory Committee is to advise local government in two broad areas, day to day issues and broader initiatives. In Pemberton the majority of agricultural lands are within the jurisdiction of the SLRD, and the Agricultural Advisory Committee members are appointed by the SLRD. The majority of AAC members are appointed from the farm community
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 324 of 408 This is Page 6 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
to gain the best advice on agricultural issues. Collaboratively, the Agricultural Advisory Committee brings a variety of expertise and knowledge to discussions and decision making within the SLRD.
The Pemberton Agricultural Advisory Committee has been proactive in making recommendations to the SLRD that will preserve the agricultural integrity of farming in the Pemberton Valley.
At the January 20th meeting of the Agricultural Advisory Committee Meeting after a lengthy discussion and upon hearing from adjacent farmers and the public present at the meeting the following motion was made and carried:
“That the AAC recommends to the Regional Board that the Regional Board oppose the application for an OCP Amendment/Rezoning for the Copperdome Lodge, given: The incompatibility of the proposed use and adjacent active farm operations; The lack of oversight and the lack of (and insufficient room for) and acceptable buffer between a proposed tourist commercial use and the adjacent surrounding farm operations; A history and continued risk of confrontation, complaints and litigation; A perceived bio-security risk that could negatively impact surrounding farm operations; and The change would not result in a net benefit to agriculture.”
The AAC is concerned for the future of arming in the Pemberton Valley. Despite the fact that farming has been the longest sustaining business in the Pemberton Valley, issues and concerns with regard to bio security, trespassing, vandalism, traumatizing livestock, and erosion of farm operations for other land uses are escalating. Farmers do not feel supported. Safeguarding, securing, and supporting productive farms in the Pemberton Valley now, will ensure the continuity of food production for our community now and into the future.
On behalf of the AAC, I would encourage individuals, families, and businesses of the community of Pemberton to endorse the AAC’s recommendation to the SLRD to oppose the application for an OCP amendment/rezoning for Copperdome Lodge.
Noel Roddick Mr. Roddick was opposed to the rezoning. He read a letter addressed to Ladner Marty Van Loon dated March 23, 2010 sent by John Savage, President
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 325 of 408 This is Page 7 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
of the Delta Farmers’ Institute, and Todd May, President of the Richmond Farmers’ Institute, which stated:
We are writing to support Pemberton farmers in their opposition to the proposed OCP Amendment/Rezoning for Copperdome Lodge.
In Delta, we have a thriving Agricultural Industry on 25,000 acres of productive farm land, and Richmond’s figure is 10,000 acres, also productive farm land, both within Metro Vancouver. Because of our proximity to Metro Vancouver, and farming on the urban edge, we are extremely well versed with all the problems that arise for farm operators.
Our Institutes have approximately 100 members each and work very closely with our Municipal Councils, Metro Vancouver, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands.
Potatoes are one of the most important crops in Delta and Richmond, and, as a result, many of our growers purchase ‘seed potatoes’ from Pemberton. Because of this, we know the Pemberton Valley area, and the pressures on farm land that are within close proximity to the expanding Communities of Pemberton and Whistler.
By working together it is possible to have an expanding urban community and a viable agricultural community surrounding it. Your Agricultural Advisory Committee has listed four valid reasons why this rezoning should not take place. 1. Incompatibility of the proposed use and adjacent farm operations. 2. No room for any buffer between the lodge and neighbouring farms. 3. A history of, and a continued risk of confrontation, complaints and litigation. 4. A perceived bio security risk that could negatively impact the entire Pemberton Seed Potato business.
The Agricultural Advisory Committee summarizes their reasons with ‘that the proposed change would not be a net benefit to agriculture’. The Delta Farmers’ Institute and the Richmond Farmers’ Institute fully support the Squamish Lillooet District Agriculture Advisory committee recommendations.
It is perhaps useful to point out that farmland is obviously much less densely populated than urban or suburban areas. It is for this reason, that municipalities have Agricultural Advisory Committees to put forward the Agricultural point of view. Please contact the Delta
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 326 of 408 This is Page 8 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Farmers’ Institute, or the Richmond Farmers’ Institute, if you have any questions, or require further information.
Roxy Kuurne Ms. Kuurne read from her letter which she subsequently submitted: Pemberton I would first like to introduce myself to those of you who may not know me. My name is Roxy Kuurne. I am a retired Agrologist with degrees in Agriculture specifically Soil Science. I researched and wrote the Soil Survey of the Pemberton Valley. My husband and I farm in the upper Pemberton Valley. We grow seed and table potatoes as well as raise beef cattle. We started out as small lot farmers with 34 acres of our own and gradually took on more as we rented small acreages from other people. I have lived and worked in this valley for over 30 years. This does not make me an ‘old timer’, but I do have some experience with the issues involved around agriculture here.
There are many issues involved when discussing zoning of small lots within the agriculture zone. The issues facing farmers when farming in and around small lots include: 1. litter drifting onto farmland and being processed into hay which is then consumed by cattle who can become ill or even die from so-called hardware disease. 2. dogs harassing livestock and even wildlife. 3. noise from late night gatherings. 4. increased traffic along Pemberton Meadows Road. 5. issues that non-farmers may have with legitimate farm practices. 6. trespass of individuals on farmland for recreational pursuits
There are also issues that face non-farm users of small lots within the agriculture zone including: 1. dust from field tillage and harvesting practices. 2. use of chemical sprays used to control weeds, insects and/or fungus 3. odors from feedlots, manure spreading, spraying 4. flies 5. noise from late night or early morning farm practices 6. farm traffic travelling along public roadways.
It seems that the best way to resolve the issue of small lots within the agriculture zone would be to not allow them in the first place. That being said, we already have this issue that must be addressed.
The proposed rezoning is requesting the ability to extend the commercial aspects of this enterprise. The proposal does not indicate any proposed benefit to agriculture or suggestion as to how to
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 327 of 408 This is Page 9 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
mitigate any negative impacts that it might have on the neighbouring farm operations.
There are also bio-security issues and concerns here. This proposal will have people from around the world being invited to this property with the potential of bringing with them such devastating diseases such as foot and mouth disease of cattle, avian flu of poultry, bacterial ring rot of potatoes. These concerns need to be addressed by the proponent.
The exact nature of what might be developed in the future on this property and the implications of those plans have not been identified.
All of these issues and probably many more that I haven’t mentioned combine to make co-existence of residential or non-farm commercial/tourist activities with active commercial farming enterprises a very tricky proposal. There are some mitigation procedures available to help reduce the potential for conflict. However, when the building covers a large portion of the property and is situated very close to the property line, it would be very difficult to put up and effective buffer between the building and the farms.
There is already a history of conflict and litigation between the Copperdome Lodge and adjacent farm operators. This makes it very difficult to work out a workable solution for both sides.
For these reasons I believe that this rezoning request should be refused.
Also for these reasons it would seem appropriate that the proposed Agriculture Area Plan be completed as soon as possible to reduce the number of these types of applications.
Dave Melnychuk Mr. Melnychuk, an agrologist, was here to support the farming Langley community. A Tourist designation would be inappropriate next to farmland. He had seen lots of farmland being converted to other uses. Farmers have a special relationship with their land. Local government should support the integrity of the land base and intrusion into farmland can be avoided. Non-agricultural uses in agricultural areas can create problems such as pesticide application and noise complaints.
Valerie Roddick Ms. Roddick, Chair of the committee which produced the BC Ladner Agriculture Plan, read from her letter which she subsequently submitted:
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 328 of 408 This is Page 10 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
British Columbia’s agriculture industry has a proud history, a vibrant economic present and promising profitable future. The BC Agriculture Plan: Growing a Healthy Future for BC Families reflects the values and concerns that the public and farm community voiced to the Agriculture Plan Committee about the future of agriculture in British Columbia. It provides a vision and direction for sustaining and facilitating the growth and diversification of the industry.
Increasing public understanding of the importance of agriculture and its challenges and needs will help bridge the urban/agriculture divide, raise demand for local, healthy food and contribute to creating a greener environment for future generations. The business of farming needs to be strengthened and streamlined to facilitate growth, bring new entrants into farming and ranching and intensify innovative development of BC’s agriculture and agri-food industry.
British Columbia’s agricultural future is bright, and is currently undergoing unprecedented change, posing both significant challenges and exciting opportunities. The BC agriculture and food sectors are facing fierce global competition, increased costs of production, intense competition for inputs such as labour, land and energy. At the same time, opportunities for the sector include developing and commercializing new scientific advances and diversifying into higher-value products, marketing directly to the consumer. This description fits Pemberton to a T.
The Provincial Agriculture Plan is designed to support the Agricultural Industry. The Province has listened to the Agricultural Community and is striving to meet their needs.
The preservation of Agricultural land through the ALR serves a compelling public interest and the Province is committed to finding ways to support present and future generations of farmer, to keep agricultural land productive and contributing to the agricultural economy.
A renewed focus on profitability is necessary to support an economically sound future for farming. THIS is critical to attracting new farmers.
The proposal on the table is in no way compatible with our Provincial Agriculture Plan.
In fact one of our key themes in the Plan is bridging the urban/agricultural divides: The Pemberton Valley and its continent
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 329 of 408 This is Page 11 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
wide industry of 1st class Seed Potatoes is a perfect example – zoning by laws and farm use bylaws should be made to ensure the regulatory structures support the growth of farming in BC – not hinder it!! BC Agricultural producers are passionate about ensuring the industry remains sustainable and competitive for generations to come. We are working to re-establish the essential link between agriculture and society as a whole for the millions of people in BC who consume food every day but do not understand the importance of local food production. After all, we still have to eat to live!!
We need to work together – as Dick Klein Geltink said when he was chair of BCAC: “we wish government did a little more with us and for us rather than to us.
With all the rules and regulations farmers are hit with how was this incompatible redevelopment possible??
Please understand the generosity of the local farm community for donating this land for a school originally. Agriculture has done this sort of thing country wide – so many of our rural schools, churches, hospital and ice rinks have all been supplied by the farming communities. Why is it now being used against them? Why are we allowing them to be taken advantage of?
YES we as citizens obviously want our communities to thrive and grow but we must work together on the overall Land Use Plans.
Strip development is completely outdated and that is the giant step backward that is being proposed here.
Ensuring the Land Use Plan is effective and holds water is imperative.
This Valley is unique and its seed potato industry a hugely valuable asset to the area, the province and the country.
BE BOLD – stand together behind your agricultural heritage and its future generations.
We DO still all have to EAT to LIVE!!
Jennie Helmer Ms. Helmer noted that we live in a global economy and therefore should Pemberton Meadows not be pitted against each other. She asked that the Board support the farming community by not supporting the rezoning, and that the Area C Agricultural Area Plan be adopted as soon as possible.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 330 of 408 This is Page 12 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Anna Helmer Ms. Helmer acknowledged that tourism was important, but that they like Pemberton Meadows to invite the people themselves. She was also concerned about the bio security risk. The place is not right for rezoning.
Marty Van Loon Mr. Van Loon did not support this application for all the reasons stated. Pemberton Meadows There needs to be a buffer zone between the urban and rural. This business has been in operation for a year now and is now looking for permission to continue. He asked that the Board support the AAC’s recommendations, and stand up for the farming community.
Lisa Griffith Ms. Griffith was opposed to the rezoning. She supports the AAC’s Pemberton recommendations, and notes that the Area C Agricultural Area Plan does not support this.
Marty Van Loon Mr. Van Loon noted that the SLRD Board had turned down an application in the valley a few years ago, and the person is here tonight. He asked that the Board not do the wrong thing.
Simon Harvey Mr. Harvey had applied years ago to change the zoning for his business Pemberton Meadows up the valley. He was denied the zoning and feels today, that it was the right call by the SLRD. He wondered if it would set a precedent by allowing small acreages to be turned into businesses.
Melissa Ronayne Ms. Ronayne read a letter by her Father-in-law, Jack Ronayne, Pemberton President of the Pemberton Seed Potato Growers, and subsequently submitted the letter:
I wish to express my opposition to the rezoning of Copperdome Lodge on behalf of the Pemberton Seed Potato Growers. We are not opposed to businesses thriving in our community, but feel that this particular lodge at this location would be a threat to the success of the seed potato industry.
The spread of disease is a real concern for all farmers in this valley. Encouraging a potential constant flow of foreigners into such close proximity with working farms poses a threat to the fragile environment that is unique to our valley. We are one of only two seed potato control areas in the world. We must ensure its protection.
I ask that you take our concerns seriously, and deny this application.
Kathleen Scobie Ms. Scobie lives in Poole Creek, but her grandparents’ property has
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 331 of 408 This is Page 13 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Poole Creek been trespassed on by guests of the lodge. She is totally opposed to this bylaw.
Michelle Porter Ms. Porter noted that the property is clean and tidy. There have been Pemberton/ group rentals for educational users for workshops, seminars and Vancouver training. She felt that there was a low-risk for bio security as the people come to focus on their own activities, not to trample around. She noted that 2500 people come to the valley for the Slow Food Cycle to learn more about agriculture. Other people have also been holding events on their farms.
Krista Simms Ms. Simms expressed her opposition to this rezoning. She noted that Pemberton people have travelled far to come support the farming community on this issue.
Rosemary Walden Ms. Walden questioned the rights if the rezoning was approved. The Pemberton property was donated as a school.
Jack Ronayne Mr. Ronayne lives next door to the Copperdome Lodge and he can rebut Pemberton Meadows the proponent’s trespassing comment. He noted that “School” is used loosely. He opposed this application.
Brenda McLeod Ms. McLeod has been farming since the 1950’s here, and notes that Pemberton farmland has been threatened by recreation users: fences cut down; dogs and garbage; vandalism and trespassing. She asks that the SLRD support the farmers.
Michelle Bek Ms. Bek lives 2 kilometres north of the Copperdome Lodge. She stated Pemberton Meadows her opposition to this application for the reasons already noted: bio security; trespassing.
Simon Harvey Mr. Harvey wanted to know what rights go with the property if the Pemberton rezoning is allowed. What happens when the property is sold?
Mr. Olmstead explained that the bylaw documents what is there now and lists the permitted uses. The bylaw was crafted to legitimize the existing buildings.
Mr. Harvey wanted to know if his neighbour with 2 acres can also apply to rezone?
Mr. Olmstead replied that everyone can apply to rezone. The process provides opportunity to support or deny the application.
Doug Helmer Mr. Helmer was as member of the AAC and heard quite a few proposals
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 332 of 408 This is Page 14 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Pemberton Meadows over the years, on fringe developments. The issue of buffers was always used to evaluate the proposals. There is no room for a buffer in this application; he urges the Board to turn down the application.
Garth Phare Mr. Phare noted that when people talked about logging being threatened Pemberton years ago, nobody listened. He compared it with farming today. He recommended that the application be turned down, so that the farming industry has a chance.
Susan Gimse The Chair called a first time for further comments.
Tanya Neit Ms. Neit opposed the rezoning for all the reasons stated. Pemberton Meadows
Chris Hellevang Mr. Hellevang was opposed to the Bylaw Amendment. He thinks it will Pemberton Meadows set a precedent.
Jeff Simms Mr. Simms was opposed to this application for the same reasons. He Pemberton Meadows has a one year old son who he would like raised among farming relatives.
Andrea Van Loon Ms. Van Loon was very opposed to this rezoning for all the reasons Pemberton Meadows stated.
Matthew Van Loon Mr. Van Loon runs the vegetable honour stand up the valley; he grew Pemberton Meadows enough on 2 acres for 5 months of sales. We need to support the farmland.
Hy Croft Mr. Croft disagreed with the application. The Bylaw should be Pemberton Meadows cancelled.
Tina Beks Ms. Beks was completely opposed to the bylaw. The land should be preserved for future generations.
Claire Brown Ms. Brown questioned whether the Agricultural Impact Assessment Pemberton could be conducted before a decision could be made – for people to consider.
Mr. Olmstead replied that the Board could call for further study. It would entail another public hearing in the future. Yes, it can be a condition for moving forward.
Brenda McLeod Ms. McLeod wanted to know if the decision would be based on the numbers of support or non-support? She suggested that the Public Hearing take a break so that people can submit their approvals or
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 333 of 408 This is Page 15 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
disapprovals.
Chair Gimse noted that people can submit written submissions before the close of the public hearing.
Jeanette Helmer Ms. Helmer requested a copy of Kim Sutherland’s and Dave Pemberton Meadows Melnychuk’s letters. She commented on the vast knowledge of the agricultural community, and that the community needs to support the farmers.
Marty Van Loon Mr. Van Loon wanted to remind the Board that the people directly affected have to be heard over people from abroad.
Dave Nord Mr. Nord does custom spraying and agreed that there are pesticide regulations.
Jennie Helmer Ms. Helmer stated that it shouldn’t be about numbers because the Pemberton farmers are here tonight. She requested that the Bylaw does not get 3rd Reading.
Susan Gimse The Chair called a 2nd time for further comments.
Hank Lipsett Mr. Lipsett thinks of the cliché “the toe in the door” – let’s close the Pemberton Meadows door.
TERMINATION Director Gimse called a third time for further comments and submissions. There being none, she declared the meeting closed at 8:40 PM.
Susan Gimse Director, Electoral Area C
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 334 of 408 This is Page 16 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Summary of All Written Bylaw 1162 & 1163 Submissions
Name Location Form COMMENT FOR AGAINST letter? Irene Whistler Provides education and farm X Gutteridge experiences
Scott Owl Ridge Disapproval “seems hollow” X McLagan The farming community did not seem to be concerned about the school or the Outward Bound Drew Pemberton The property was used as a school for X Meredith many years The property was used for overnight accommodation in conjunction with the Outdoor School with no complaints No issues were raised when the SLRD granted variance permits to Outward Bound Need to support Agri-tourism Need to legitimize this use Tami Whistler X Support X Overbeck Kim Vancouver X Support X Marshall but Pemberton property owner Francis Pemberton X Support X Ingham Melanie Pemberton X Support X Litheureux Ugo Jean Pemberton X Support X Joanne Pemberton X Support X Graham M. Jld?? Pemberton X Support X Aquieszka Pemberton X Support X Bak Alexander Pemberton X Support X Stoll A.Bjorndal Pemberton X Support X
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 335 of 408 This is Page 17 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Katherine Pemberton X Support X Adams Yannick Pemberton X Support X Labonte J.Adam Pemberton X Support X Jsokee?? Jenine Pemberton X Support X Bourbonnais Jeff Juniper Walkerville X Support X Jenine Pemberton X Support X Bourbonnais Russell Pemberton X Support X McNolt? Sarah Curtis Pemberton X Support X Angela Stott Pemberton X Support X Verdell Whistler X Support X Jessup Alan Firth Pemberton X Support X Shane Pemberton X Support X Bourbonnais Pat and Julie Pemberton X Support X Kelly Brenda Pemberton X Support X Williams Len Ritchie Pemberton X Support X Inge Pemberton X Support X Flanagan Jenny Bubbs Pemberton X Support X ??Bubbs? Pemberton X Support X Allen Pemberton X Buildings already used for X McEwan accommodation Buildings are already in existence No major difference from Outward Bound Tourism does not pose a threat to agriculture LeBlanc Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Kathleen Mt.Currie X Bad precedent X Scobie Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 336 of 408 This is Page 18 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Bev and Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Corie Bad precedent Newsome Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Anna and Pemberton Bad precedent X Eric Sinclair Tourism opportunities exist in Whistler ALR should be preserved Pemberton Pemberton This would ignore the OPC, RGS and X Farmers pending AAP Institute Expanded uses are proposed Potential for conflicts with farmers Matthew Pemberton Potential for conflicts with farmers X Van Loon Bad precedent Need to preserve farmland Accommodation should be located in suitable areas Delores Pemberton Agritours should be on existing farms X Franz Los Need to preserve farmland Brandy Pemberton Need to protect farmland X Ronayne Biosecurity risk Potential for conflicts with farmers Joe Ronayne Pemberton Biosecurity X Existing lodge is already violating zoning reg’s and should not be rewarded Bad precedent Melissa, Pemberton Concern about conflict with farmers X Bryce,Wyatt Concerns about biosecurity and Hunter Need to preserve farmland Ronayne Priscilla Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Hebert Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Colleen D’Arcy X Need to preserve farmland X Chan Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Dave Fehr Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Stefan Beks Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Laura Beks Pemberton X Need to preserve farmland X
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 337 of 408 This is Page 19 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Bad precedent Lodging belongs in Pemberton Village Jeannette Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X and Doug Bad precedent Helmer Concerns about potential conflicts and complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Concern about loss of family farms L.Clements Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X The Martin Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X Family Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Mary L. and Pemberton Bad precedent X Clifford Concern about elite seeds Ronayne There is nowhere to walk John and ? Tourist accommodation next to farms X Sharon is not a good idea Tschopp Pat and Bob Salmon Arm Concerns about potential conflicts X Priest and complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Concern about loss of family farms Don Millerd Pemberton Concerns about potential conflicts X and complaints against farming operations Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Bad precedent People will apply for retroactive approvals Need to preserve farmland
Jeff Washington Writer is a customer of the X Bedlington State Ronayne’s. Concern about the potato industry and seed quality
Rosemary Pemberton Original land transfer may have been X Walden through forged signatures Applicant knew the zoning when he bought the property Concerns about potential conflicts and complaints against farming
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 338 of 408 This is Page 20 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
operations (noise, odours, etc.) Trespass concerns Enhancements and investments to the property do not justify a rezoning Need to preserve farmland
John Pemberton Concerns about trespass X Ronayne Concern about seed potato quality Rezoning disrespects the intent of the original land donation Need to preserve farmland Marie Pemberton Concerns about conflicts and X Ronayne complaints against farming operations (noise, odours, etc.) Need to preserve farmland Concerns about trespass Bad precedent
John and Pemberton Bad precedent X Michelle Concerns about a commercial Beks operation challenging farming practices Concerns about trespass Concern about bio-security Property is too far away from amenities Need to preserve farmland This rezoning violates the SLRD’s policies Commercial property should be located in a more suitable location Tina Beks Need to preserve farmland X Bad precedent Lodging belongs in a more suitable location Marty and Pemberton Bad precedent X Andrea Van Concerns about a commercial Loon operation challenging farming Michelle practices Beks Concerns about trespass John Beks Concern about bio-security Marie Concerns about conflicts and Ronayne complaints against farming
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 339 of 408 This is Page 21 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Jack operations (noise, odours, etc.) Ronayne Concerns about a commercial Dave operation challenging farming Hellevang practices Krista Lodging belongs in a more suitable Simms location Roxy Kuurne Pemberton Litter X & Concerns about conflicts and Mark complaints against farming Kuurne operations (noise, odours, chemical dust, dust, flies, farm traffic, etc.) Harassment of Livestock Increased traffic Concerns about a commercial operation challenging farming practices Concerns about trespass Concerns about bio-security Agricultural Area Plan should be completed
Meg Gallup Pemberton Original land transfer was a mistake X Do not rezone farmland Anne Pemberton Need to preserve farmland X Pomeroy Autor
Chris Power Whistler X Need to preserve farmland X Lodging belongs elsewhere Albert Bush Pemberton Oppose X Geoff Pemberton Oppose X Mcleod Klaus Fotsch Pemberton Oppose X Dave Terralink Oppose X McKinn Horticulture Marie Pemberton Oppose X Ronayne Meg Gallup Pemberton Oppose X Need to support farming Veronika Pemberton Oppose X Vackova Allan Fraser Pemberton Oppose X
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 340 of 408 This is Page 22 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
Brenda Pemberton, See reasons noted in April, 2010 staff X McLeod AAC report Ray Mason Pemberton Oppose X Lorine van Pemberton Oppose X Voorst
John Savage Presidents Need to protect farmland X and Todd of the Delta Incompatibility with farming May and No room for any buffer Richmond A history and future risk of Farmers’ confrontation Institutes Biosecurity risk Valerie Retired Need to protect farmland X Roddick Delta South Protection of farming is in the public MLA and interest co-author of Bio security the BC Food security Agriculture Concern about urban encroachment Plan
Dave Langley Concern about urban encroachment X Melynchuk, Need to protect farmland and former farmers regional Potential for conflict agrologist Can disrupt normal farm practices Need to discourage non-farm uses Connie Pemberton X Alternative accommodation should X Norman be pursued Candice Pemberton X Need to protect farmland X Graham Pat Pemberton X Need to protect farmland X Bencharski Olak Perkins Pemberton X Need to protect farmland X Jack Pemberton Need to protect farmland X Ronayne Concern about biosecurity Neil Van Pemberton Concern about biosecurity X Loon Existing violations should not enable a rezoning Applicant knew this when they bought the land
Rhy Walden Pemberton Bad precedent X Existing violations should not enable
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 341 of 408 This is Page 23 of the Minutes of Public Hearing for Bylaw 1162 and 1163 convened by the Regional Board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, held on March 31, 2010 at 7:00 PM in the Pemberton Community Centre, at 7390 Cottonwood Street, Pemberton BC.
a rezoning Not a good location for accommodation Concern about biosecurity Concern about conflicts Need to protect farmland Krista Pemberton Not a good location for X Walden accommodation Concern about conflicts Concern about biosecurity Concern about trespass Bev Nolan Pemberton Not a good location for X accommodation Concern about conflicts Anton de Pemberton Need to protect farmland X Bakker Matthew Pemberton Bad precedent X Van Loon Need to protect farmland Jeff Simms Pemberton Bad precedent X Concern about conflicts Need to protect farmland Lea Pemberton Bad precedent X Ronayne Need to protect farmland Tony Pellett Agricultural Agricultural Impact Assessment X Land should be requested Commission Cites OCP policy 6.6 – alternative sites should be considered…
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 342 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 343 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 344 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 345 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 346 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 347 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 348 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 349 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 350 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 351 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 352 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 353 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 354 of 408 Fraser Basin Council – Thompson Region Committee Meeting Summary from 13 April 2010
In Attendance:
Mickey Macri Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee Member Denis Delisle Columbia-Shuswap Regional District Alternate for Marty Bootsma Herman Halvorson Regional District of North Okanagan FBC Director Dave Whiting Community Mapping Consultant Committee Member John Taylor Thompson-Nicola Regional District FBC Director Glen Farrow City of Kamloops Committee Member Tom Owen Thompson Rivers University Committee Member Bob Harding Fisheries and Oceans Canada Committee Member Bob Smillie Public Director FBC Director Phil Hallinan Fraser Basin Council Staff Mike Simpson Fraser Basin Council Staff
1. Welcome and introductions
Mike Simpson welcomed all present, and everyone introduced themselves and affiliations. Agenda was accepted as presented.
2. Old Business from 9 March 2010
Mike circulated copies of a draft letter to Ministry of Environment regarding the public consultation process for the railway tie gasification proposal by Aboriginal Cogeneration Corporation (ACC) in Kamloops that has been a significant issue for the last several months. Despite the fact that the proposal was rescinded by the proponent, it was felt that the letter should still be sent, as this is relevant to several other large developments. It was agreed to request notification of permit applications or amendments made to MOE. It was agreed that the letter should be cc’d to CAOs of the City of Kamloops and the 4 regional districts in the Thompson area, but not to MLAs.
It was also suggested that in addition to this letter, regional districts could bring this issue to UBCM in September, and that Bob will continue to raise the issue with the Ops committee.
ACTION #1: Mike will revise the letter, send it out for further comment to those present at today’s meeting, with feedback sought by 23 April 2010.
Glen Farrow and Tom Owen attended the public meeting on the railway tie gasification proposal on 11 March 2010 in Kamloops. They reported that the session was well moderated and polite, but that the public was overwhelmingly against the project. It was also noted that ACC still has a permit from MOE for the project, and that Ruth Madsen is leading an appeal to rescind this permit.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 355 of 408 3. Committee Member Reports
Mickey Macri, SLRD Fire season, Area B looking at fuel mitigation projects and start implementing. Mickey is the only director in Lillooet area that’s taking this on. Taking on as a small project to begin with. John found liability issues with TNRD by treating different areas, but not others. Regional growth strategy underway, into dispute resolution with Squamish. Problem with Squamish is 2 restraining issues – they want more control within their area. District of Lillooet has some concerns – hard to rope the northern and southern area together. Goldbridge (Area A) did not participate.
Glen Farrow, City of Kamloops Water meters moving forward – residential for single family dwellings, 3 year program of installation – east first in 2011. They are putting off huge capital upgrades to fund this as other funding has not worked. Multi family recycling – curbside recycling for multi-family units. Compost facility and recycling depot opening tomorrow. Sustainability Plan – public forum on Saturday 17 April 2010, 9am to 4pm at Interior Savings Centre. All inclusive with air, land, water, energy, homelessness, food security, economic development with goals and targets for each. Draft plan will be developed with this input, expected later this year.
Tom Owen, TRU Out of the ACC issue which became a highly partisan issue, Tom was involved with others who identified the need for a broad-based forum for environmental issues. There is concern that issues become taken over by one-dimensional special interest groups. To preserve broader focus of sustainability, we need a community network that can do advocacy. Information network to meet periodically, but mostly be an electronic network. Centred in Kamloops but covering the broader area. TRU is facilitating it, and BC sustainable energy group.
ACTION #2: Tom will provide the contact info and purpose of this new group to Mike, and we will discuss at May regional committee meeting.
Denis Delisle, CSRD Salmon arm revamping OCP Scotch Creek doing first OCP – 800 units being applied to be built Malakwa possibly losing school Medical clinic in Scotch Creek being lost OCP for Ranchero-Deep Creek…
Herman Halvorson, RDNO Service reviews – Greater Vernon water and Parks and recreation underway, MOE said they cannot go ahead with getting out of distribution. A facilitator has been hired to attempt to resolve the issues. Boat access reviews underway in Cook Creek up by interpretive Centre, Mabel Lake - DFO and COs arranging access and keys
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 356 of 408 Incineration 3km from Herman’s house – lots of concern – public information meeting was held, lots of articles and letters in papers. Need more information – revamping information, it will eventually go to a hearing. Antwerp Springs under review from MOE and staff – putting 2 wells to bed that were a problem with contaminants in the water. Wait for final report. Doodle Creek should be on stream for potable water supply by August, and Antwerp Springs for agricultural use. Snow packs low – 52% of historic levels, which raises concerns. 5000 feet and below in Shuswap side is very dry, most snow up high. 2 plans on Shuswap – local plan in Kingfisher and Mabel Lake areas. High sports tourism area, canoeing, kayaking, etc. SLIPP – Herman met with Phil to discuss. Mosquito control in Okanagan valley – most areas getting funded, North Okanagan is not getting funded, but they have the largest population that carries West Nile Virus – concern for organic farmers (would use malathion), health, and tourism impacts. Herman is following up with provincial government. Regional Growth Strategy going forward – 8 different topics, water is main one. Completed by fall 2011.
Bob Harding, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Shuswap watershed – year end money for community mapping network. Video, still photos, buoys are all digitized and available for enforcement staff. Works best with Firefox or CSRD atlas video. Give it a try…looking to upload Mabel Lake and other areas this year. See www.cmnbc.ca and pick Columbia Shuswap watershed Step 1 and 2 – completed for Shuswap and Mabel Lake. Step 3 – funded by SLIPP – in discussion stage for Shuswap Lake, stalled but moving forward. Requested $20-30K for community works fund. Next steps – step 2 for lower Shuswap River and guidebook. Court case of Old Town Bay – press release coming. The defendent plead out. $5000 as a fine, and total of $70K redirecting creative sentencing fund to be put into either SLIPP or another restorative process. N. Thompson – applied for funds for Simpcw to do Morris and Lemeiux Creek mapping – low flow, agriclutlre and fish passage issues Skeetchestn – capacity dollars to do SHIM mapping (sensitive habitat inventory mapping) on Deadman Creek. Lower Shuswap Stewardship Society got funding and are doing a project on riparian fencing, rebuild channel, and develop a demonstration project.
ACTION #3: Bob will do a presentation to May regional committee meeting if he has material ready.
Dave Whiting Back from holidays in SW USA, working on 3 diverse initiatives North Thompson atlas – local government guide, and adding a component of examples of what local government can make with this atlas. Solar radiation modeling and monitoring – with Agriculture Canada and some agrologists, BC Grape Growers, and others. Using GIS to model solar radiation and selecting optimum locations for solar radiation in the Lillooet area Partnership with IHA and Make Children First – mapping breast feeding friendly places in Kamloops. TNRD library is friendliest place in town. Ultimate use would be designation for businesses, orientation of staff, and public education. Objective is to
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 357 of 408 confirm breast feeding as safe and preferable option for health and that it’s socially acceptable.
John Taylor, TNRD Westwold meeting to introduce the Agriculture Canada research project on 20 March 2010 was good TNRD is looking at implications of HST in electoral aras Clinton volunteer fire department will do emergency road rescues now in Area E Taxes regional wide are generally even – ranged from $39 increase to $30 decrease at most Emergency services at TNRD – manager Terry Cress has recently retired. Over 40 landfills inherited from province – doing Crown leases with Front Counter BC and asking for post-closure monitoring. Have to monitor for leachate it produces, and it could cost millions to deal with leachate over decades. Recycling – reducing from 34 to 18 transfer stations. Couldn’t put one in Chase, public reaction in Pritchard was also eventually negative.
Bob Smillie Attended community homeless forum on 12 April 2010 – Kamloops approach is a novel one, very well received by most present. 120 people turned out. Division of family practice being established in Kamloops for primary care – cooperative effort from Ministry of Health Services, Interior Health Authority and BC Medical Association – implications are trying to make primary care accessible for people without coverage. Retirement potential is 45% in next 10 years in province. 25% of population in Kamloops does not have physician.
4. Operations Committee
Bob Smillie will raise the gist of the letter to MOE discussed earlier in the meeting regarding public process to Ops committee tomorrow. Bob will raise a correction to the March Ops committee record of decision, clarifying that ACC is not an aboriginal or first nations run organization. He has also recently raised the Salmon Arm methane gas project at the landfill.
Bob reported that Ops committee has continued to discuss the lower Fraser River debris trap, that funding and operational control is still an ongoing issue. This will come back to the June board meeting agenda. Bob reported that core funding from the province was absent in 09/10, and not hopeful for 10/11. Federal core funding has strings attached for deliverables and events.
John Taylor sits on the Finance Committee, and reported from the 1 April 2010 committee meeting. The committee is hoping to streamline financial statements to make them more detailed, yet easier to read and decipher. The chair and executive director made a presentation to BC Finance Minister Colin Hansen on 9 April 2010.
5. Staff Report
a. Shuswap Lake Integrated Planning Process (SLIPP)
Phil reported that at the January regional committee meeting, he did a preview of the planning process. Presentation to CSRD was in January. Next steps are that they need to fund the secretariat and move it forward. Want to extend to Sugar Lake, and will be
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 358 of 408 Shuswap watershed and not just the lake. Will be convening a meeting this spring of the political people and CAOs of local governments affected by SLIPP at local government level, to determine the funding mechanism, or if there will be one at all. This includes RDNO, CSRD, TNRD and the municipalities. Phil feels they’ve been too far out in front of the politicians. Phil will determine first nations involvement, whether tribal council or band level, and which ones.
Phil has also been doing: UBCM and rural directors – resource roads issue. Ray Shultz is holding a series of consultations regarding maintenance of resource roads. As forest industry level of maintenance decreases, some organization must maintain them. Water act – being sold as environmental legislation. It needs to be dominant legislation that over-rides other legislation, not just be another act.
b. Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices (WEBs)
Mike reported that almost $85 000 was spent on the Agriculture Canada project in fiscal 09/10, predominantly on an agricultural economist and purchasing the weather station equipment to be installed this year. About $5000 was for FBC to host the Westwold community workshop, where over 40 local producers who irrigate came out to hear about the research project and ask questions. This project will continue through fiscal year 12/13, approximately $110 000/year.
Mike also reported that $55 000 has been approved from the Fraser Salmon and Watersheds Program (FSWP) to predominantly do outreach and communication with ranchers about irrigation, agriculture and other water needs. A booth will be shared with Andrew Petersen of Ministry of Ag and Lands at the BC Cattlemens’ AGM in Williams Lake, 27-29 May 2010.
c. Funding Opportunity for Rural Areas
Mike raised awareness of the “Community Development Program” funding source from the Rural Secretariat, Agriculture Canada. This funding source is aimed at rural and northern communities to partially fund partnership and collaboration agreements, aimed primarily at economic development or other initiatives to strengthen rural and northern regions. See http://www.rural.gc.ca/RURAL/display- afficher.do?id=1242239600032&lang=eng for more information.
ACTION #4: Committee members to review this funding program, and the Regional Action Plan idea for further discussion at the May regional committee meeting about project ideas for rural areas such as N. Thompson, Lillooet, etc.
d. Upcoming Events City of Kamloops Sustainability Forum on April 17 at Interior Savings Centre, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM. The purpose is to gather input from the public on sustainability goals and targets as outlined in the Sustainability Plan. For more information, visit www.kamloops.ca/sustainable “Celebrate the Shuswap Week” hosted by Shuswap Environmental Action Society and partners, April 18 – 24 see www.shuswapwatershed.ca Southern Interior Local Government Association AGM – 28-30 April at Sun Peaks
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 359 of 408 Silver Hills ranch agri-stewardship weekend, Lee Hesketh’s ranch – 14-15 May near Lumby Federation of Canadian Municipalities – 28 May – 1 June in Toronto Fraser Basin Council board meeting – 2-3 June in Williams Lake Local government academy – 16-17 June in Vancouver
6. Next Meeting and Summer Schedule
Next Meeting – Tuesday 11 May 2010, 10am-12pm at Thompson Regional Office
Future Meeting Schedule – regular meetings are 10am to 12pm on the second Tuesday of the month, except no meeting in August.
Meeting adjourned at 12:05 pm
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 360 of 408 AGENDA Thompson Regional Committee Meeting 10:00am - 12:00pm, Tuesday April 13th, 2010 Thompson Regional Office - Boardroom
Objectives
1. Discuss regional projects, existing and new 2. Provide input for Operations Committee, and feedback from it 3. Prepare for future Board meetings
Agenda Items
1. Welcome and introductions 2. Old business from 9 March 2010 3. Committee Members’ reports 4. Operations Committee a. Operations Committee report and feedback 5. Staff report a. Current initiatives WEBs (Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices) – Fraser Salmon and Watersheds Program, and Agriculture Canada b. Funding opportunity – Community Development Program, federal funding for rural and northern partnerships Fund Regional Action Plan ideas? North Thompson, Lillooet, or Merritt area? c. FYI Upcoming Events: Shuswap Watershed Week, April 18-24, 2010 “Finding Common Ground” tour and social, Lee Hesketh’s ranch, May 14-15th, near Lumby 6. Next Meeting: May 11th 2010 @ 10:00 am (Regional Office)
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 361 of 408 Attachment 2.1
DRAFT RECORD OF DECISIONS OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, February 10 2010
In Attendance: Charles Jago Dan Millar Bob Patterson Bob Smillie David Barratt Jerry Petersen Alan Osborne Jennifer Vigano Staff: David Marshall Diana Dilworth Bob Purdy Marion Town Regrets: Ken Melamed George Saddleman The meeting convened at 9:03am. 1. Approval of the Agenda
Decision 10-03-01 THAT the Agenda for the Operations Committee Meeting of March 10, 2010 be approved.
2. Approval of Draft Record of Decisions
Decision 10-03-02 THAT the Record of Decisions from the Operations Committee Meeting of February 10, 2010 be approved.
Business Arising: 2.2 Strategic Planning As a follow-up to the January Board of Directors Meeting, it was noted that the previous adhoc Committee, on Visioning, with inclusion of a few more Directors, will continue to help guide the development of a strategic planning process.
Decision 10-03-03 THAT under the direction of the Executive Director, the Senior Management Committee develop recommendations related to the Strategic Planning process for consideration at the April/May Operations Committee meeting; THAT as part of the recommendation development, a SWOT analysis take place on the current Strategic Plan by both the SMC and the Operations Committee. Action: Executive Director and Director, Organizational Development
It is anticipated that the Operations Committee will present a Strategic Planning Conceptual Framework for a new plan at the June 2010 Board of Directors Meeting. 3. Chair and Executive Director Report The Executive Director reported that: A number of a vacancies still exist on the Board and recruitment is taking place for the Upper Fraser (First Nations), Fraser Valley (First Nations) and Limited Term Appointment (Finance); Jessica Hawkins has been hired as a new Program Manager for the Fish and Fisheries Program; The SMC had an all-day meeting focused on the 2010/11 budget and the Council is still on target with what was presented to the Directors at the January Board Meeting; The Living River Advisory Committee is meeting to strategize regarding potential replenishment of the fund, which is currently slated to run out on March 31, 2012; Fraser Basin Council Operations Committee Meeting, March 10, 2010 Page 1 of 3
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 362 of 408 Attachment 2.1
The Northern Rocky Partnership group will be meeting in late April; The Collaborative Watershed Governance Initiative (CWGI) has had a second meeting and is on track with the development of a collaborative government framework for water to be completed by January 2011; Discussions continue with the Federal departments of Public Works and Transport Canada regarding funding for operational funding and debris trap funding; The Council was recognized by the Invasive Plant Council with a recognition award, presented at their Annual General Meeting in January; Two international projects are coming to an end, with the Iraq project completing on March 31st with a final report and the Brazil project wrapping up with a World Urban Forum report being made in Rio de Janeiro; The Chair and Executive Director will be meeting with Minister Hansen in the near future to discuss funding from the Government of British Columbia. 4. Board of Directors Meeting, June 2010 As a follow-up to the presentation by Director Clague at the January Board Meeting, discussion took place regarding a presentation by Director O’Brien (economic) and Director Peart (environment).
Decision 10-03-04 THAT a presentation/dialogue session focusing on the environmental and economic aspects of sustainability be scheduled for the October 2010 Board Meeting.
Action: Manager, Council Operations
Director Patterson noted that the Cariboo-Chilcoti Regional Committee are still working on logisitics for the June 2010 Board Meeting but it is anticipated that space might be available at a reduced cost at the Regional District Office. Planning for a tour and First Nations presentations is still in progress. 5. Regional Updates Cariboo-Chilcotin Region Bob Patterson noted: The Council is facilitating discussions between the local government and arts groups on a fee- for-service basis; The Cottonwood River has become an issue with potential loss of homes due to re-routing of the watercourse and erosion. The Cariboo Regional District is providing funding to investigate measures to minimize the erosion; The most recent Regional Committee agenda included discussions on the June Board of Directors Meeting, Committees and potential new Directors. Greater Vancouver Sea to Sky Region Marion Town noted: The Lower Mainland Sustainability Indicators Report is being finalized for printing; still actively seeking funding with a few potential leads; Discussions continue with the Lower Mainland Local Government Association regarding their upcoming Annual General Meeting and potential role that the Council may play; A joint initiative with the Smart Planning team regarding climate change culminated with a presentation to the City of North Vancouver; Regional staff continue be active in work on the development of a water guide; Two forums are being planned on the topic of the Fraser River Hydrology and Mountain Pine Beetle Impacts, in Kamloops and Vancouver;
Fraser Basin Council Operations Committee Meeting, March 10, 2010 Page 2 of 3
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 363 of 408 Attachment 2.1
Thompson Region Bob Smillie noted that: That the SLIPP project has been nominated for a Premier’s Award; The Stewardship Workshop, held February 24/25 had a lower registration that expected but was very well received; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada has funded the WEB project to a total of $450,000 through to fiscal year 2012/13 with the Council receiving a 10% administration fee for managing the project; The proposed co-generation project, initiated by First Nations in Kamloops, is proving to be very controversial with the Province having issued a permit with the City Council rejecting the proposal. Resolution is anticipated after a public forum being held. Fraser Valley Region David Barratt noted that: The Regional Manager is off on leave for a month due to a family health issue; A new non-Director has joined the Regional Committee and Mayor Ken Becotte from Harrison Hot Springs was welcomed by the group; Recent snowfall and water levels have been quite low which could have a potential impact on freshet. Upper Fraser Region Jerry Petersen noted that: The Flood Measures Forum in looking at an inter-disciplinary approach to flood management; A partnership with UNBC is addressing linkages between community health and river restoration; Planning for Prince George Rivers Day is underway with FBC being represented on the Steering Committee; The final report on Ambient Air Particulate Matter will be released by the end of June; A youth worker is being hired in the Prince George office for the summer. 8. Basin Wide Updates Federal Government Dan Millar noted that: The Federal Throne Speech focused on returning to a fiscal balance with an Economic Action Plan (EAP) exit strategy being implemented; available at: http://www.sft-ddt.gc.ca/eng/index.asp
Decision 10-03-05 THAT meetings be scheduled with the three Federal Government representatives on the Board of Directors; AND THAT a meeting be scheduled with the Ministers Regional Office and/or members of the BC Caucus.
Action: Executive Director and Director, Corp Dvlp and External Relations
Provincial government Jennifer Vigano noted that: The Water Act Modernization continues and input is being solicited until April 30,2010. While Debris Trap funding has been approved; it appears that additional funding for the Council will not be available. 9. Next Meeting/ Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 10:05am. Next meeting is scheduled for 9:00am on Wednesday, April 14, 2010.
Fraser Basin Council Operations Committee Meeting, March 10, 2010 Page 3 of 3
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 364 of 408 Fraser Basin Council Thompson Region Committee Meeting March 9th, 2010
In Attendance:
Mickey Macri Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Committee Member Marty Bootsma Columbia-Shuswap Regional FBC Director District Kim Perreault Thompson Youth Committee Member John Taylor Thompson-Nicola Regional District FBC Director Bob Smillie Public Director FBC Director Mike Simpson Fraser Basin Council Staff Erin Vieira Fraser Basin Council Staff
Attachments: Information sheet on Zebra and Quagga Mussels (from Director Bootsma)
Meeting commenced at 10:00 am
1. Welcome and Introductions Thompson Region Manager Mike Simpson welcomed all present Agenda and minutes accepted
2. Old business from February Action items from February’s regional committee meeting: none
3. Committee Members’ Reports John Taylor TNRD Board has heard from two delegations regarding bylaw enforcement issues related to short-term rental of residential units at Sun Peaks; the Board has decided to cease and desist further enforcement actions and refer the issue for consideration to the new Mayor and Council of Sun Peaks Resort Municipality once elected (June 2010) John will attend the Finance Committee meeting at the end of April; a report will be given to the Thompson Regional Committee shortly thereafter Mickey Macri SLRD Board received a visit from MP John Weston and voted in support of private member’s Bill C-475, an Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 365 of 408 SLRD has amended a building bylaw to introduce climatic data; this is to comply with climatic change targets Electoral Area B Official Community Plan was adopted; a component thereof includes the adoption of Riparian Area Regulations Marty Bootsma Shuswap Lake Integrated Planning Process (SLIPP) has been nominated for the Premier’s Award SLIPP still does not have a funding structure in place The Adams Lake Indian Band roadblock in the Gleneden area of Salmon Arm has been removed; the City still needs to pursue the issue of pedestrian safety in this area The methane gas capture project at the municipal landfill is underway; there is a partnership in place with Terasen Gas for this project and captured methane gas will be sold to Terasen. The CSRD Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) has a goal of providing full curb side garbage and recycle pickup service; the Request for Proposals for this service has been deferred. Staff have been overwhelmed by community feedback on the SWMP. Awareness is being raised about the concern of invasive aquatic Zebra and Quagga mussels (see attachment); the mussels are not present in BC but parts of the Columbia and Fraser Basins are considered to provide high likelihood of Zebra mussel survival Kim Perreault The Community University Research Alliance (CURA) and Make Children First project has completed three statistical analysis reports that have been accepted. The project has received a short-term extension to allow for more reporting; this information will be used to enhance and develop childhood education and programs. Bob Smillie There is great polarization within the City of Kamloops regarding the proposed railway tie cogeneration plant by Aboriginal Cogeneration Corporation. It underscores the need for an enhanced collaborative process to be part of the review. Action Item: FBC will draft a letter to the Ministry of Environment; cc’d to TNRD, City of Kamloops and MLAs voicing concern over the process that has been used to review the proposal, and the lack of proper public consultation. Draft letter to be reviewed at April meeting. Action Item: Members of the Thompson Regional Committee will strive to attend a public forum on March 11 and report back to the committee in April
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 366 of 408
4. Operations Committee Report Report on the Operations Committee, February 2010 Bob Smillie reported on the development of a Regional Action Plan for the Thompson Region; the January 28th SLIPP presentation to the CSRD and the issue raised regarding governance of the watershed under the SLIPP process; the new Lower Shuswap Stewardship Society and its activities; and gave updates on the Stewardship Workshop, Air and Water Engagement Initiative, and Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices projects The next Operations Committee meeting is scheduled for March 10, 2010; discussion will address the State of the Basin Snapshot and FBC committees
5. Staff Report a. Current Initiatives Stewardship Workshop – the sixth annual BC Interior Stewardship Workshop was hosted by the Thompson Region and funding partners Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Environment Canada on February 24 and 25 in Lillooet. 42 people were in attendance. The workshop included informative presentations on subject matter relevant to stewardship, including fundraising; networking; and a tour of local stewardship projects in the Lillooet area. A post workshop evaluation indicates that the event was very successful and participants indicated a desire for the workshop to continue its annual format. Air and Water Engagement Initiative – Erin is working on revising a draft report and will soon be able to close this file. The final report will be distributed to the BC Ministry of Healthy Living and Sport, as well as to participants in the project. Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices (WEBs) o FBC now has a signed agreement in place with the project funder, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. o Mike attended a national WEBs conference in Winnipeg in February. It was a good opportunity to become familiar with the national project, to meet project researchers and partners, and discuss in more detail the Salmon River WEBs project o Approximately $70K will be spent by March 31 2010 and an additional $110K will be spent each year until 2013. o A workshop, facilitated by Fraser Basin Council, is scheduled for March 20th at Westwold Elementary School. The target audience is irrigators in the Westwold/Falkland area. The workshop will provide a venue for introducing the project and its goals/objectives to the agriculture community in the Salmon Valley.
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 367 of 408
b. Upcoming Events “Rail Ties, Real Issues” public forum on the Aboriginal Cogeneration proposal, March 11 at the TRU Grand Hall, 7:00 – 9:00 PM. Sponsored by the Kamloops Chamber of Commerce. Rural Tourism Conference on April 6 – 8 at Quaaout Lodge (Chase, BC). The conference is hosted by Thompson Rivers University and its target audience is rural communities, economic development officers, planners, tourism operators, and researchers. For more information, visit http://redtree.tru.ca/conferences. City of Kamloops Sustainability Forum on April 17 at Interior Savings Centre, 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM. The purpose is to gather input from the public on sustainability goals and targets as outlined in the Sustainability Plan. For more information, visit www.kamloops.ca/sustainable “Celebrate the Shuswap Week” hosted by Shuswap Environmental Action Society and partners, April 18 – 24. c. Other Business Mike Simpson and the committee acknowledged Erin’s upcoming departure on maternity leave and wished her well. Mike advised the committee that interviews are finishing up on March 9th, and that Erin’s replacement for the year will be present at the next regional committee meeting.
Meeting adjourned at 11:30 am
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 368 of 408 Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition Board Meeting March 16, 2010 – 10:00 am Coast Canadian Inn, Kamloops
Minutes Attendance: Name: Organization Representing:
Board Rhona Martin, Chair Columbia Shuswap Regional District Members: Randy McLean Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen Sally Watson Thompson-Nicola Regional District Alternate Jim Ogilvie Regional District of East Kootenay Alternate Warren Houde Okanagan Nation Alliance Scott Blissett Ktunaxa Nation Council Jim Edgson Region District of Central Okanagan Chris Pieper Regional District of North Okanagan Grace McGregor Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Greg Lay Regional District of Central Kootenay Mickey Macri Squamish Lillooet Regional District Geri Collins CFDC of Central Interior First Nations Regrets: Keith Matthew Shuswap Nation Tribal Council Rob Gay Regional District of East Kootenay Lennard Joe Nicola Tribal Association Larry Casper Lillooet Tribal Council Travis Kruger Okanagan Nation Alliance Staff: Dalyce Brandt SIBAC Staff Guests: Gordon Borgstrom Ministry of Community and Rural Development – Executive Director MPB Response Team Marc Imus Ministry of Community and Rural Development - Director of Community Economic Development, MPB Response Team - SIBAC Provincial Government Liaison Terry Olsen Ministry of Community and Rural Development - Executive Assistant, MPB Response Team
SIBAC BOARD MEETING
WELCOME 10:05 am Chair Rhona Martin welcomed the Board and introductions were made. AGENDA MOVED BY: DIRECTOR MCGREGOR Seconded by: Director Edgson That the SIBAC Board accept the Agenda for the March 16, 2010 Board Meeting CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 369 of 408 MINTUES from the MOVED BY: DIRECTOR EDGSON FEB. 9 & 10 BOARD Seconded by: Director Macri MEETING That the SIBAC Board accepts the minutes from the Feb. 9 & 10 Board Meeting with the following correction. Change under the Futures Game heading: Pat Lentowicz reported that Geri Collins hoped to have arranged for the REZ game to be tested before the end of March. CARRIED FINANCE MOVED BY: DIRECTOR COLLINS Seconded by: Director Watson That the SIBAC Board table the financial report until the next meeting where the financial statements will be distributed in advance for review. CARRIED CORRESPONDENCE Chair Rhona Martin presented the following items of correspondence: - Letter from Western Economic Diversification notifying SIBAC that SIBAC’s applications for the Community Adjustment Fund program have been declined. - Letter from the Nlaka’pamux Nation Tribal Council stating their withdrawal from SIBAC as a Member Organization due to the inability to pay the $5,000.00 membership fee. - E-mail message from Okanagan Nation Alliance alternate representative stating that the ONA did not have budget funds for the $5,000.00 membership fee. Discussion: How SIBAC can accommodate the First Nations community without the $5,000.00 fee. The value of First Nations participation was acknowledged.
MOVED BY: DIRECTOR EDGSON Seconded by: Director McGregor That the SIBAC Board moves the discussion regarding First Nations membership to the AGM in May. CARRIED - Letter and cheque were received from the Provincial Government for the $450,000.
MOVED BY: DIRECTOR PIEPER Seconded by: Director Watson That the SIBAC Board accepts the correspondence presented. CARRIED ANNUAL GENERAL Location: MEETING It was agreed that the meeting should be held in a different location other than Kamloops. Penticton was suggested as one community or a community identified as a community at risk. Dalyce, Rhona and
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 370 of 408 Marc will consider the options. Nomination Committee: The Board agreed that with the size of the Membership, a nomination committee was not necessary. SIBAC Board - Board Members agreed a policy was necessary, but should be Education Policy inclusive of other Board Members’ activities such as partnership building and advocacy. - Board Members should apply to SIBAC for the funding and that the event must match SIBAC’s goals and objectives and be a benefit to SIBAC. It was agreed that Dalyce, Marc and the Chair to approve requests. - A change of the policy title should be made to better reflect the purpose.
MOVED BY: DIRECTOR WATSON Seconded by: Director Edgson That a revised policy be presented for consideration at the AGM. CARRIED WATERSHED VIDEO Board Members viewed the re-edited final version of the video. A link to the video will be emailed to all Board Members. It was suggested that speaking notes to accompany the video would be helpful. PROJECT 1) Green Clean Energy as a Rural Economic Development Tool PROPOSALS MOVED BY: DIRECTOR PIEPER Seconded by: Director Edgson That the SIBAC Board (1) Approve $25,000 in funding to this project funding SUBJECT to approval as a WEPA project and (2) Approval of SIBAC as the project proponent and manager. CARRIED
2) Bioenergy Feasibility Study in the Cranbrook TSA MOVED BY: DIRECTOR PIEPER Seconded by: Director McGregor That the SIBAC Board approve the $15,000 in funding for the Bioenergy Feasibility Study in the Cranbrook TSA subject to the approval of the WEPA funding for the Green Clean Energy as a Rural Economic Development Tool project. CARRIED
3) BC Log Home & Timber Framing Building Manufacturers – Business and Market Expansion Initiative MOVED BY: DIRECTOR EDGSON Seconded by: Unknown That the SIBAC Board approves the $25,000 in funding to this project funding SUBJECT to approval of this project as a WEPA project. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 371 of 408 4) Size Matters – Helping small MPB “at-risk” communities in the southern interior. MOVED BY: DIRECTOR BLISSETT Seconded by: Director Watson That the SIBAC Board not approve the Size Matters – Helping small MPB “at-risk” communities in the southern interior. CARRIED
5) Developing a Strategic Framework and Action Plan for the Completion of a Watershed Management Plan for the Kettle River Watershed. MOVED BY: DIRECTOR MCGREGOR Seconded by: Director Edgson That the SIBAC Board approves the $30,000 funding for the Kettle River Watershed Management Plan. CARRIED
6) Silviculture Assessments for MPB Impacted Watersheds in Southern Interior BC MOVED BY: DIRECTOR MCGREGOR Seconded by: Director Pieper That the SIBAC Board approve in principle $25,000 subject to partnership funding for Siliviculture Assessments of MPB Impacted Watersheds in the Southern Interior BC. CARRIED - Marc to send out the list of completed MPB watershed risk assessments. - Marc to approach the Ministry of Environment for a presentation after the AGM that summarizes watershed assessments conducted to date in the southern interior (for SIBAC to consider in developing priorities for the coming fiscal year)..
7) Developing a strategic approach to determine potential impacts between mountain pine beetle and drinking water quality in the East Kootenays, B.C. MOVED BY: DIRECTOR MCGREGOR Seconded by: Director McLean That the SIBAC Board reserve $15,000 to for a project to develop a strategic approach to determine potential impacts between MPB and drinking water quality in the East Kootenays, BC, subject to partnership funding. CARRIED
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 372 of 408 8) My Brother’s Place Director Watson excused herself from the meeting citing a conflict of interest and returned after the vote was taken.. MOVED BY: DIRECTOR MACRI Seconded by: Director Collins That the SIBAC Board approves $5,000 for the My Brother’s Place project. CARRIED 9) SIBAC Salvage Strategy Viewer Tool Pilot MOVED BY: DIRECTOR WATSON Seconded by: Director Macri That the Salvage Strategy project be tabled until after the Board has had a demonstration of the Viewer Tool. CARRIED 10) Rural Community Leadership Training MOVED BY: DIRECTOR BLISSETT Seconded by: Director Lay That the SIBAC Board not approve the concept paper on Rural Community Leadership Training. CARRIED
11) Recreation Sites and Trails MOVED BY: DIRECTOR MACRI Seconded by: Director Watson That the SIBAC Board not approve funding for the recreation sites and trail project to improve the Boot Lake, Bob’s Lake West and Island Lake recreation sites.
CARRIED
Adjourned 2:55 pm
SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 373 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 374 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 375 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 376 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 377 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 378 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 379 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 380 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 381 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 382 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 383 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 384 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 385 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 386 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 387 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 388 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 389 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 390 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 391 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 392 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 393 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 394 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 395 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 396 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 397 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 398 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 399 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 400 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 401 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 402 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 403 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 404 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 405 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 406 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 407 of 408 SLRD Regular Meeting Agenda; April 26, 2010 Page 408 of 408