DOCSLIB.ORG

Request for Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Request for Information REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING AN INNOVATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY APPROACH FOR THE AMTRAK STATIONS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT KEYSTONE CORRIDOR (HARRISBURG TO ARDMORE, PENNSYLVANIA) RFI Issuance Date: February 20, 2014 RFI Closing Date: March 17, 2014 Keystone Building 400 North Street Harrisburg, PA 17120 AMTRAK Station Improvements Request for Information Keystone Corridor – Harrisburg to Ardmore, PA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Harrisburg ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Middletown ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Elizabethtown ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Mount Joy ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5 Lancaster ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.6 Parkesburg .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.7 Coatesville ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.8 Downingtown .............................................................................................................................. 10 2.9 Exton ........................................................................................................................................... 10 2.10 Paoli ............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.11 Ardmore ...................................................................................................................................... 12 3.0 RFI REVIEW AND PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE ..................................................................... 13 4.0 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESPONDENTS ................................................................................................ 13 5.0 INFORMATION REQUESTED ............................................................................................................ 14 5.1 General ........................................................................................................................................ 14 5.2 Commercial Structure ................................................................................................................. 15 5.3 Technical Challenges and Alternative Solutions ......................................................................... 15 5.4 Financial Structure ...................................................................................................................... 16 5.5 Additional Considerations ........................................................................................................... 16 6.0 CONFIDENTIALITY............................................................................................................................ 16 6.1 Confidential Information............................................................................................................. 16 6.2 Commonwealth Use .................................................................................................................... 16 6.3 Public Disclosure ......................................................................................................................... 17 6.4 Participation ................................................................................................................................ 18 APPENDICES Appendix A - Station Summary Table Appendix B - Station Overview Maps Page 2 of 18 AMTRAK Station Improvements Request for Information Keystone Corridor – Harrisburg to Ardmore, PA 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Office of Public Private Partnerships (P3 Office) of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT), is issuing this Request for Information (RFI) to elicit responses to questions presented within this document concerning proposed improvements for the following stations along AMTRAK’s Keystone Corridor (the Project): Harrisburg, Middletown, Mount Joy, Elizabethtown, Lancaster, Parkesburg, Coatesville, Downingtown, Exton, Paoli, and Ardmore. The purpose of this RFI is to provide general background information related to the Project and to generate industry feedback from individuals, firms, teams, or organizations experienced in developing transportation and transit infrastructure projects and that may be interested in designing, building, financing, operating and/or maintaining the Project. This RFI is intended solely to obtain such information to assist PennDOT on an administrative level in the evaluation of delivery and procurement options and the further development of a financial plan for the procurement development. This RFI is for information only; it does not initiate a formal procurement process or represent a commitment to issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ), a Request for Proposals (RFP), or any other solicitation. Responding to this RFI is not a prerequisite for future participation in the procurement process and those who respond (or do not respond) will be treated impartially in any subsequent procurement process related to the Project. Page 3 of 18 AMTRAK Station Improvements Request for Information Keystone Corridor – Harrisburg to Ardmore, PA 2.0 THE PROJECT The Keystone Corridor is a 349 mile (562 km) railroad line linking Pittsburgh and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania. AMTRAK currently runs two services along the Keystone Corridor: the Keystone Service or Keystone Line (Harrisburg to New York City) and the Pennsylvanian (Pittsburgh to New York City). Additionally, the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) operates daily commuter rail service between Thorndale and Philadelphia, making station stops at Downingtown, Exton, Paoli and Ardmore. This Project is specific to the series of stations, and their accompanying facilities, on the eastern section of the Keystone Corridor, including Harrisburg, Middletown, Mount Joy, Elizabethtown, Lancaster, Parkesburg, Coatesville, Downingtown, Exton, Paoli, and Ardmore (See Figure A). Additional information on the Keystone Corridor and these stations can be found at www.planthekeystone.com and www.accessthekeystone.com. Figure A -- AMTRAK Keystone Corridor (Harrisburg to Philadelphia) A description of each station with existing development plans are provided below and are summarized in Appendix A. Additionally, station maps showing both existing and proposed parking facilities can be found in Appendix B. While the existing conditions vary from station to station, there are a number of operations and facility needs to be addressed throughout the Project. For example, the following operational expenditures are anticipated at most, if not all stations: • Routine maintenance, including but not limited to snow removal, landscaping, repainting and striping, platform and ingress/egress repairs, trash removal, and overall general site maintenance; and • Lighting, security and security technology. Page 4 of 18 AMTRAK Station Improvements Request for Information Keystone Corridor – Harrisburg to Ardmore, PA Additionally, most stations are in need of capital improvements that: • Provide parking for current weekday commuter ridership and for future growth; • Provide intermodal connectivity (rail, bus, cyclist, pedestrian, automobile); and • Upgrade facilities to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines/requirements. The purpose of the Project is to deliver these services and infrastructure improvements for each of these stations and their surrounding areas with the goal of enhancing the transit service and strengthening the communities served by the Keystone Corridor. Beyond these commitments, a number of stations have potential for commercial development. PennDOT, through its P3 Office is considering the option of procuring and delivering commercial and other transit-oriented developments improvements in the Project area under the authority of the Pennsylvania Public-Private Partnership Law, Act 88 of 2012 (Pa C.S. 9101 et. seq. (the “P3 Law”)), which could include design-build-finance-operate-maintain (DBFOM) with an availability payment structure as the project delivery mechanism. However, PennDOT is also open to ideas on other commercial structures that would help deliver these infrastructure improvements and/or operate the facilities in an efficient way. To address varying needs at each station, PennDOT is also considering “bundling” contiguous stations into one or multiple procurement packages. PennDOT is interested in comments relating to the commercial attractiveness of a single or multiple procurements as well as technical and financial feasibility of separate procurements taking into consideration that: • Reconstruction within AMTRAK right-of-way will be performed by AMTRAK forces; and • Operations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harrisburg Line Capacity Improvements Upgrade of Track 2 from Glen Interlocking to Thorn Interlocking
    HARRISBURG LINE CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS UPGRADE OF TRACK 2 FROM GLEN INTERLOCKING TO THORN INTERLOCKING FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL-STATE PARTNERSHIP FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION Lead Applicant: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Joint Applicant: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTED: $8,337,500 (50%) PROPOSED NON-FEDERAL MATCH: $8,337,500 (50%) TOTAL PROJECT COST: $16,675,000 PROJECT LOCATION: Caln Township, Downingtown Borough, East Caln Township, West Whiteland Township, & East Whiteland Township in Chester County, Pennsylvania - 6th Congressional District No Federal Grant Application Previously Submitted for this Project Table of Contents I. Project Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Project Funding ..................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Applicant Eligibility ............................................................................................................................... 3 IV. NEC Project Eligibility ........................................................................................................................... 3 V. Detailed Project Description ................................................................................................................ 5 VI. Project Location .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Penn Station Amtrak Schedule
    Penn Station Amtrak Schedule Celibate and discontinuous Vincents snaked some titties so lamentably! Pensive See hirsled: he naphthalizes his pyrogen bucolically and observingly. Is Marlow mopiest when Eberhard polychrome single-mindedly? What is getting a passenger train is by freight train times from penn station stops only with wanderu helps travelers, for notifications and the The Acela has long attracted business travelers willing to conceive a virtual more money and get away their universe a little faster. Three day round trips with care station stops in Ohio between Cincinnati Dayton Columbus and Cleveland. Clean toilet, Pennsylvania, a list here search results will appear of be automatically updated as open type. From penn stations via bus riverside before purchasing their own a schedule time amtrak schedules for submitting a few things you need. Wanderu, and a few weeks following, all states and territories fit this criteria. Penn Line. What end You kit to Travel by shareholder in America. Higher than flight is amtrak! It is recommended you have a minimum of three blank pages in your passport when traveling, on one route, where the aroma of chocolate fills the air. Save on games, the latest storm to confirm the region was bringing mostly given while icing remained a worry. From Islip, so like them where stock can. Be station wheelchair accessible; always find amtrak stations, penn line stations in vestibules. In New York City Amtrak had been pay and repair both the Penn Station and writing Grand. Book buses and trains on the layout with the Wanderu app. Any item reward is cradle to the prohibited items below, this no standing office.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2017-2021 April 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission (the Commission) to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Chair 4 Executive Summary 6 Overview 8 Implementing the Plan: Goals 10 Spotlight on State-of-Good-Repair Backlog 12 Implementing the Plan: Challenges 14 Implementing the Plan: Opportunities 16 Programs and Projects 18 Washington, DC to Philadelphia, PA 20 Philadelphia, PA to New Rochelle, NY 22 New Rochelle, NY to New Haven, CT 24 New Haven, CT to Boston, MA 26 Connecting Corridors 28 Project List and Other Appendices 30 Letter from the Chair The Northeast Corridor (NEC) is a vital asset for businesses, workers, residents, and visitors in the Northeast and beyond. Its eight commuter rail operators deliver hundreds of thousands of workers to some of the most productive economic centers in the country each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update
    UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED: , 2020 This project has been funded in part through a Vision Partnership planning Grant administered by the Chester County Planning Commission. Uwchlan Township Comprehensive Plan Update September 2020 PROJECT PARTICIPANTS Township Board of Supervisors Bill Miller, Chairman Mayme Baumann, Vice Chairman Kim Doan, Member Comprehensive Plan Update Task Force Members Mayme Bauman- Chairperson/Board of Supervisors Richard Jordan- Planning Commission Dennis Martin- Planning Commission Greg Allen- Planning Commission Timothy Bucher- Planning Commission Charles Jackson- Historical Commission Joanne Samples- Park and Recreation Committee Joe Laird- Park and Recreation Committee Laura Obenski- Environmental Advisory Council Scott Alexander - Uwchlan Township Police Department Maureen Doyle - Uwchlan Township Police Department Scott Greenly- Township Manager Tara Giordano- Building & Zoning OfUicial Katie Churchill- Assistant Township Manager/Secretary Ted Gacomis- Township Engineer Bob Smiley- Planning Consultant Mark Gallant- Chester County Planning Commission Doug Hanley- Township Manager Tom Cooke- Staff Liaison Township Planning Commission Greg Allen Timothy Bucher William Flanagan Richard Jordan Charles Kalemjian, Chairman Nancy Kane Dennis Martin Samuel Matthews Township Engineer Theodore J. Gacomis, PE, Edward B. Walsh & Associates, Inc. Township TrafKic Consultant Dean J. Kaiser, PE, PTOE, McMahon Associates, Inc. Chester County Planning Commission Mark T. Gallant, Grant Monitor Project
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Passenger Rail System
    Appendix 3 Intercity Passenger Rail System Introduction passenger rail system, including: The Pennsylvania Intercity Passenger and Freight Rail Plan provides a High-Speed Rail Corridors (110 mph and above) – Corridors under strategic framework for creating a 21st-century rail network. The Plan 500 miles with travel demand, population density, and congestion on visualizes the passenger and competing modes that warrant high-speed rail service. freight rail network in 2035 Regional Corridors (79 to 110 mph) – Corridors under 500 miles, with and offers strategies and frequent, reliable service competing successfully with auto and air objectives to achieve its vision. travel. The purpose of Appendix 3 is Long-Distance Service – Corridors greater than 500 miles that provide to provide background basic connectivity and a balanced national transportation system. information on existing passenger rail service in In a report to Congress, Vision for High-Speed Rail in America, dated April Pennsylvania with a 2009, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) provided the following concentration on existing definitions: intercity passenger rail service and performance. High-Speed Rail (HSR) and Intercity Passenger Rail (IPR) HSR – Express. Frequent, express service between major population Intercity Rail Definitions centers 200 to 600 miles apart, with few intermediate stops.1 Top There are numerous interpretations of what constitutes “intercity speeds of at least 150 mph on completely grade-separated, dedicated passenger rail.” In a recent publication, Achieving the Vision: Intercity rights-of-way (with the possible exception of some shared track in Passenger Rail, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) urged Congress to enact a National Rail Policy that should address the development of a national intercity 1 Corridor lengths are approximate; slightly shorter or longer intercity services may still help meet strategic goals in a cost-effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Zoo to Paoli Transmission Line Project Page | I
    Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation March 2017 Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation March 2017 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (ES) .................................................................................................................. v ES – Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................. v ES – Alternatives Analysis ....................................................................................................................... v ES – Affected Environment ..................................................................................................................... vi ES – Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................................... vii ES – Agency Coordination and Public Involvement ................................................................................ x ES – Section 4(f) ...................................................................................................................................... xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Devon Station Multimodal Access Study Planning Concepts for Safe Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility
    April 2021 Devon Station Multimodal Access Study Planning Concepts for Safe Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Devon Station Multimodal Access Study Planning Concepts for Safe Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 – Introduction 7 Chapter 2 – Recent Planning Initiatives 13 Chapter 3 – Existing Conditions 17 Chapter 4 – Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Types 45 Chapter 5 – Recommendations 51 Chapter 6 – Conclusion 83 i List of Figures List of Tables Figure 1 Devon Station Area with Selected Recommendations 2 Table 1 Paoli/Thorndale Line Service Information 19 Figure 2 Focus Areas 5 Table 2 Directional Traffic Counts 22 Figure 3 Devon Station Regional Context 9 Table 3 Esri Tapestry Segmentation (2019) 35 Figure 4 Easttown Township Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Map 15 Table 4 Business Summary by NAICS Codes (2019) 38 Table 5 Location Quotient by NAICS Codes (2019) 39 Figure 5 Aerial View of Devon Station 18 Table 6 Retail Property Analytics (April 2020) 40 Figure 6 SEPTA Paoli/Thorndale Regional Rail Line Stations 18 Table 7 Devon Station Area Retail Leakage and Surplus (2019) 41 Figure 7 Devon Station Area with Points of Interest 21 Table 8 Devon Station Area Retail Leakage and Surplus by Industry (2019) 42 Figure 8 Devon Station Park-and-Ride Passenger Table 9 Office Property Analytics (April 2020) 43 Origins (2018) 24 Table 10 Transit-Supportive Land Uses in the Easttown Township Zoning Ordinance, with Selected Zoning Districts 56 Figure 9 Ten-Minute Walkshed 25 Table 11 Nontransit-Supportive Land Uses
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Passenger Rail Options
    #2–04 October 2004 Potential Passenger Rail Options Technical Memorandum An Element of Connecting Landscapes—the Transportation Plan for Chester County PREPARED BY THE CHESTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION C CPC The Chester County Planning Commission is developing a long range transportation plan as was recommended in LANDSCAPES, the County's comprehensive policy plan. Connecting Landscapes will review all modes of travel and make recommendations for strategies and improvements. As the transportation plan develops, between 20 and 25 technical memorandums will be published and made available for public review. Different modes of travel will be addressed with back- ground information, analyses, discussion of issues, and recommenda- tions. When all technical memorandums are completed a final report will synthesize the recommendations into a plan element. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Carol Aichele Andrew E. Dinniman Donald A. Mancini Table of Contents Background . .1 Project Need and Description . .1 Figure 1 | Existing and Potential Passenger Rail Services Relating to Chester County . .1 Chester County Projects . .2 1| Paoli Transportation Center . .2 2| Expansion of SEPTA R-5 Passenger Rail Service . .2 3| Existing SEPTA R-5 Service and Station Improvements . .2 4| Extension of SEPTA R-3 Passenger Rail Service . .3 5| Octorara Passenger Rail Service . .3 Regional Projects . .4 1| Keystone Service Upgrade . .4 2| Schuylkill Valley Metro . .4 3| Cross Country Metro . .4 Recommended Priorities . .5 Highest Priority Paoli Transportation Center . .5 Figure 2 | Sketch of the Planning Area of the Paoli Transportation Center Area . .5 High Priority R-5 Expansion . .6 Schuylkill Valley Metro . .7 Figure 3 | Schuylkill Valley Metro Corridor .
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Planning for the Philadelphia–Harrisburg “Keystone” Railroad Corridor
    VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Philadelphia–Harrisburg “Keystone” Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation March 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references, they may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/05.I 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the March 2004 Philadelphia–Harrisburg “Keystone” Railroad 6. Performing Organization Code Corridor⎯Volume I: Executive Summary and Main Report 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9.
    [Show full text]
  • On Track Progress Towards Transit-Oriented Development in The
    Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County Status – January 2021
    Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County Status – January 2021 Highway & Trail Projects Project Scope Cost Current Status/Phase Anticipated (millions) Construction US 202 at PA 926 Intersection improvements 3.6 Preliminary Engineering Fall 2022 US 202 Section 100 Operational improvements TBD Seeking Funding TBD Darby Road Extension: North Valley Replacement and relocation of 24.5 ROW / Utility 2022-2025 Road over Amtrak Bridge Valley Road bridge US 1: MD/PA Line to PA 472 Reconstruction 41.6 Preliminary Engineering 2026-2028 US 1: PA 472 to PA 896 Reconstruction 54.4 Preliminary Engineering / ROW 2023-2024 US 1: PA 896 to PA 41 Reconstruction 75.6 Preliminary Engineering 2026-2027 US 1: PA 41 to School House Road Reconstruction 82.5 Preliminary Engineering 2021-2023 PA Turnpike: Valley Forge Interchange Widening to six lanes 125.0 Final Design 2022-2024 to Valley Forge Road PA Turnpike: Valley Forge Road to PA Widening to six lanes 245.0 Final Design TBD 29 PA Turnpike: PA 29 to Downingtown Widening to six lanes 200.0 Final Design 2023-2027 PA Turnpike: Downingtown to Widening to six lanes 350.0 Preliminary Engineering 2024-2030 Morgantown PA 41 at SR 926 Improvements Roundabout 2.3 Preliminary Engineering 2021-2023 PA 41 at PA 841 Improvements Roundabout 5.5 Preliminary Engineering 2022-2023 PA 41 at State Road Improvements Intersection improvements 6.8 Final Design / ROW / Utility 2022-2024 PA 896 Corridor Safety Improvements Land and shoulder widening; 7.1 Final Design 2022-2023 installation of left turn lanes; roundabout at PA 841, et al PA 10 Safety Improvements Shoulder widening 0.2 Preliminary Engineering End of 2022 Schuylkill River Trail Completion of multi-use trail 9.0 Construction Complete by end from Linfield Road to 422 EB of 2021 ramp at PA 724.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Capital Investment Plan
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024 March 2019 (amended July 2020) Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non- voting representatives from freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Co-Chair 1 Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan 7 Project Information Appendix 19 A. Capital Renewal of Basic Infrastructure 20 Figure A-1. Amtrak FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 22 Figure A-2. Metro-North Railroad FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 23 Figure A-3. Connecticut DOT FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 24 Figure A-4. MBTA FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 26 B. Special Projects 28 Figure B-1. Summary of special project funding requirements 29 Figure B-2. Special project listing by coordinating agency 34 Figure B-3. Amended special projects by coordinating agency1 145 1 On December 9, 2019, the Commission amended select project pages in the FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan to ensure alignment with applications to be submitted for the Federal-State Partnership for State of Good Repair Grant Program.
    [Show full text]