DOCSLIB.ORG

KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY ZONE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Borough of Downingtown

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY ZONE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Borough of Downingtown KEYSTONE OPPORTUNITY ZONE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Borough of Downingtown NOTICE Request submission of proposals from consultants for consultant services to create a transportation center scheme for the Downingtown train station associated with the redevelopment of the Downingtown Keystone Opportunity Zone; Borough of Downingtown, Pennsylvania, Chester County. Applicants who are interested in undertaking this study shall submit four (4) copies of a proposal containing the information specified to: Downingtown KOZ Development Committee 4 West Lancaster Avenue Downingtown, PA 19335 Attn: Milllie Byerly 610-269-0344 x 201 [email protected] Proposals must be submitted on April 21, 2006, no later than 4:00 pm. DOWNINGTOWN BOROUGH DOWNINGTOWN KOZ DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION 2006 TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE REQUEST FOR SERVICES The Borough of Downingtown and its KOZ Development Committee are soliciting Proposals from consultants to provide: Project Consultant services to create a transportation center scheme utilizing a new train station, a new ADA accessible compliant pedestrian tunnel, new parking layout (structure or ground), proposed commercial uses and the existing rail platform associated with the redevelopment of the Downingtown Keystone Opportunity Zone (KOZ). Project Consultant services to provide the Borough with technical information to establish the engineering criteria and layout of the station, tunnel, parking and existing platform and the coordinated layout of all the facilities. Consultant to provide estimated construction budgets for the related improvements intended to improve the function and usability of the Downingtown Train Station. Specific improvements to be evaluated will include: o New station layout coordinated with the existing platform o Access from the new pedestrian commuter tunnel beneath the Amtrak tracks o New parking layout with the new station and new pedestrian tunnel o Location of a new station either in a new proposed structure or a stand alone building Project Consultant services to survey current ridership utilizing the Downingtown rail station. This survey will examine the relationship between current ridership, station amenities, and patronage of Downingtown commercial facilities. Develop and market the promotional plan that will be utilized to actively promote the use of the Downingtown rail station. Develop an operational budget that will improve the operational aspects of the Downingtown rail station. The KOZ Development Committee, on behalf of the Borough of Downingtown, will oversee the work of the Project Consultant and will guide the project. The KOZ Committee will review all payment invoices and ensure necessary coordination with the Borough and DVRPC. 1.2 THE STUDY AREA The Project will focus on the Borough of Downingtown KOZ opportunity area. This is the vicinity of the existing Downingtown rail station 1.3 PROJECT BACKGROUND Downingtown Borough is located within Chester County, one of the fastest growing regions in Pennsylvania. The Borough has a population of approximately 8,000 people within 2.2 square miles. The Downingtown Keystone Opportunity Zone was one of the first twelve KOZs approved by Governor Ridge in 1998. Within each KOZ state corporate net income, capital stock and franchise and personal income taxes are waived for 12 years for employers and residents doing business or living in the KOZ. The area designated as Downingtown’s KOZ is in the Johnsontown area of the Borough. The Amtrak train yard on the west end of town and the surrounding area were designated tax-free parcels. Preferred land use and development concepts for the KOZ are identified in Ordinance 2002- 09, Chapter 287 (Uptown Transportation Development District) of the Downingtown Borough Code. These concepts were developed through a collaborative process led by the Torti-Gallas planning group. This process, completed in 1999, produced a development concept that includes a mix of land uses centered on the redevelopment of the train station. Additional issues relating to the access and traffic congestions were evaluated as part of the Transportation Needs Report prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. This study included the evaluation of the potential realignment of Route 322 to provide access to the KOZ and by-pass the congested intersection of Lancaster Avenue and Brandywine Avenue. 1.4 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This report and plans will assist the Borough to establish the design criteria and cost of implementing the redevelopment of the train station and related improvements as noted in Section 1.1. of this request. Additionally, the Project Consultant will identify and assist in the preparation of applications for specific grants that can be obtained in order to further the implementation of the improvements. 1.5 SOURCES OF FUNDING The source of the funding for the requested services is a TCDI grant awarded by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC). 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 SPECIFIC TASKS, DELIVERABLES, AND SCHEDULE The TCDI grant for the Project will be used by the KOZ Development Committee to fund the cost of feasibility studies, cost estimates and grant application support for the following improvements: 2.2 Station Design and Management The consultant will provide a scheme with design specifications of what the proposed Downingtown Train Station will look like when rebuilt either as a stand alone building or as part of a commercial building at the location of the present station. The design specifications/criteria required to redevelop the train station in accordance with all regulations shall be provided with the proposed scheme. The consultant will provide a proposed layout of the station area needed for Amtrak and SEPTA to meet the needs of their customers. Consideration shall be given to a station incorporated into a proposed structure used for office and/or retail as well as a stand alone station. The scheme/plan developed by the consultant will show how all the spaces and facilities are coordinated and how they will connect both horizontally and vertically with the existing rail platform. The scheme/plan will show how the pedestrian commuter tunnel, parking facilities, and station are to be designed to provide ADA access. The consultant will provide a construction cost estimate for the implementation of the proposed improvements. Costs will include design, construction and inspection. The consultant will develop an operational budget plan should Downingtown Borough assume ownership and operation of the new rail station. The consultant will provide the required information in a report format with plans, sections and architectural layout. 2.3 Ridership Development and Promotion 2.3.1 Rail Ridership Survey Pursue license plate survey data and review historical data collected at the Downingtown Station and adjacent stations (including Thorndale and Whitford), by the Chester County Planning Commission (CCPC) or other agencies. Conduct a new survey if necessary. A notarized affidavit is required to submit license plate numbers to PennDOT and to receive address data in return. This will require either receiving direct authorization from PennDOT or working through a third party (CCPC or DVRPC) that already has that authorization. Develop, pre-test and conduct a survey for current station passengers to determine their destination, preferred ridership amenities and other needs related to their transit trip. Identify a reasonable sampling of the ridership from different day parts, including commuter and non- commuter traffic. The survey can be conducted by: Intercept (particularly to reach non-peak travelers) Windshield survey, with a postage paid response envelope to maximize participation Internet, with notice to passengers through the web link and use of a code number at the front end to limit participation to train users Develop, pre-test and conduct a survey that would allow community residents to provide feedback about transportation needs, their perceptions of what might attract them to use the Downingtown station. This survey document could be distributed through a local weekly newspaper (or a zoned edition of a daily newspaper), at civic events, sent to community leaders, or otherwise made available to the public. The newspaper insert methodology would be like that used by the Chester County Planning Commission transportation needs survey. Statistically significant sampling techniques may be too expensive to conduct under this project scope. If permitted by PennDOT data rules, a separate survey could be distributed to residents of the Downingtown area that are using other stations, based on the license plate survey results. This would ask what services or amenities would get them to shift to the Downingtown station. Design, pre-test and conduct a survey of Downingtown area business firms and students of the Delaware County Community College Downingtown campus to determine their transit needs. Surveys would involve business firm meetings and student intercepts at the campus. Share survey data on amenities and travel needs with the rail station design consultant. 2.3.2 Rail Station Operational Plan Conduct research on ownership models for station projects and advise the project team on a preferred alternative. This will be done through literature reviews and direct contact with major commuter/regional rail operators. Single ownership versus condominium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harrisburg Line Capacity Improvements Upgrade of Track 2 from Glen Interlocking to Thorn Interlocking
    HARRISBURG LINE CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS UPGRADE OF TRACK 2 FROM GLEN INTERLOCKING TO THORN INTERLOCKING FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL-STATE PARTNERSHIP FOR STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM GRANT APPLICATION Lead Applicant: Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Joint Applicant: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTED: $8,337,500 (50%) PROPOSED NON-FEDERAL MATCH: $8,337,500 (50%) TOTAL PROJECT COST: $16,675,000 PROJECT LOCATION: Caln Township, Downingtown Borough, East Caln Township, West Whiteland Township, & East Whiteland Township in Chester County, Pennsylvania - 6th Congressional District No Federal Grant Application Previously Submitted for this Project Table of Contents I. Project Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Project Funding ..................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Applicant Eligibility ............................................................................................................................... 3 IV. NEC Project Eligibility ........................................................................................................................... 3 V. Detailed Project Description ................................................................................................................ 5 VI. Project Location .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft: 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update
    UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ADOPTED: , 2020 This project has been funded in part through a Vision Partnership planning Grant administered by the Chester County Planning Commission. Uwchlan Township Comprehensive Plan Update September 2020 PROJECT PARTICIPANTS Township Board of Supervisors Bill Miller, Chairman Mayme Baumann, Vice Chairman Kim Doan, Member Comprehensive Plan Update Task Force Members Mayme Bauman- Chairperson/Board of Supervisors Richard Jordan- Planning Commission Dennis Martin- Planning Commission Greg Allen- Planning Commission Timothy Bucher- Planning Commission Charles Jackson- Historical Commission Joanne Samples- Park and Recreation Committee Joe Laird- Park and Recreation Committee Laura Obenski- Environmental Advisory Council Scott Alexander - Uwchlan Township Police Department Maureen Doyle - Uwchlan Township Police Department Scott Greenly- Township Manager Tara Giordano- Building & Zoning OfUicial Katie Churchill- Assistant Township Manager/Secretary Ted Gacomis- Township Engineer Bob Smiley- Planning Consultant Mark Gallant- Chester County Planning Commission Doug Hanley- Township Manager Tom Cooke- Staff Liaison Township Planning Commission Greg Allen Timothy Bucher William Flanagan Richard Jordan Charles Kalemjian, Chairman Nancy Kane Dennis Martin Samuel Matthews Township Engineer Theodore J. Gacomis, PE, Edward B. Walsh & Associates, Inc. Township TrafKic Consultant Dean J. Kaiser, PE, PTOE, McMahon Associates, Inc. Chester County Planning Commission Mark T. Gallant, Grant Monitor Project
    [Show full text]
  • On Track Progress Towards Transit-Oriented Development in The
    Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County Status – January 2021
    Transportation Priority Projects in Chester County Status – January 2021 Highway & Trail Projects Project Scope Cost Current Status/Phase Anticipated (millions) Construction US 202 at PA 926 Intersection improvements 3.6 Preliminary Engineering Fall 2022 US 202 Section 100 Operational improvements TBD Seeking Funding TBD Darby Road Extension: North Valley Replacement and relocation of 24.5 ROW / Utility 2022-2025 Road over Amtrak Bridge Valley Road bridge US 1: MD/PA Line to PA 472 Reconstruction 41.6 Preliminary Engineering 2026-2028 US 1: PA 472 to PA 896 Reconstruction 54.4 Preliminary Engineering / ROW 2023-2024 US 1: PA 896 to PA 41 Reconstruction 75.6 Preliminary Engineering 2026-2027 US 1: PA 41 to School House Road Reconstruction 82.5 Preliminary Engineering 2021-2023 PA Turnpike: Valley Forge Interchange Widening to six lanes 125.0 Final Design 2022-2024 to Valley Forge Road PA Turnpike: Valley Forge Road to PA Widening to six lanes 245.0 Final Design TBD 29 PA Turnpike: PA 29 to Downingtown Widening to six lanes 200.0 Final Design 2023-2027 PA Turnpike: Downingtown to Widening to six lanes 350.0 Preliminary Engineering 2024-2030 Morgantown PA 41 at SR 926 Improvements Roundabout 2.3 Preliminary Engineering 2021-2023 PA 41 at PA 841 Improvements Roundabout 5.5 Preliminary Engineering 2022-2023 PA 41 at State Road Improvements Intersection improvements 6.8 Final Design / ROW / Utility 2022-2024 PA 896 Corridor Safety Improvements Land and shoulder widening; 7.1 Final Design 2022-2023 installation of left turn lanes; roundabout at PA 841, et al PA 10 Safety Improvements Shoulder widening 0.2 Preliminary Engineering End of 2022 Schuylkill River Trail Completion of multi-use trail 9.0 Construction Complete by end from Linfield Road to 422 EB of 2021 ramp at PA 724.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Capital Investment Plan
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024 March 2019 (amended July 2020) Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non- voting representatives from freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Co-Chair 1 Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan 7 Project Information Appendix 19 A. Capital Renewal of Basic Infrastructure 20 Figure A-1. Amtrak FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 22 Figure A-2. Metro-North Railroad FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 23 Figure A-3. Connecticut DOT FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 24 Figure A-4. MBTA FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 26 B. Special Projects 28 Figure B-1. Summary of special project funding requirements 29 Figure B-2. Special project listing by coordinating agency 34 Figure B-3. Amended special projects by coordinating agency1 145 1 On December 9, 2019, the Commission amended select project pages in the FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan to ensure alignment with applications to be submitted for the Federal-State Partnership for State of Good Repair Grant Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024
    Northeast Corridor Capital Investment Plan Fiscal Years 2020-2024 March 2019 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non- voting representatives from freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. Contents Letter from the Co-Chair 1 Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. FY20-24 Capital Investment Plan 7 Project Information Appendix 19 A. Capital Renewal of Basic Infrastructure 20 Figure A-1. Amtrak FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 22 Figure A-2. Metro-North Railroad FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 23 Figure A-3. Connecticut DOT FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 24 Figure A-4. MBTA FY20-24 Baseline Capital Charge Program 26 B. Special Projects 28 Figure B-1. Summary of special project funding requirements 29 Figure B-2. Special project listing by coordinating agency 34 Letter from the Co-Chair The Northeast Corridor is the nation’s busiest and most complex passenger railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Travelin' Grampa
    The Travelin’ Grampa Touring the U.S.A. without an automobile Focus on safe, fast, convenient, comfortable, cheap travel, via public transit. Vol. 11, No. 3 礪 March 2018 Photo credit: Bruce Neumann, WPVI Channel 6 ABC Philadelphia. t Eagles players wave from Big Bus during Super Bowl victory parade. See a report by WPVI reporters Rick Williams, Cecily Tynan and Jeff Skversky at: http://6abc.com/sports/eagles-honored-with-phillys-first-super-bowl-parade/3053345/ Most folks walked or rode to Eagles victory parade More than two thirds of spectators at the big Super Bowl victory parade and subsequent event in Philadelphia did not drive there. They walked or/and rode public transport. Even drivers ended up riding public transportation or/and often walking considerable distances*. Grampa includes as public transport: SEPTA, PATCO, NJ Transit, DART, Amtrak, Greyhound, Trailways, Uber share ride, Lyft share ride, taxicab share ride, commercial passenger airlines, CCT*, Community Transit*, TransNet*, Rover*, and charter bus services charging fare per passenger. The two-thirds number is based on an attendance estimate of around 700,000 by crowd counting experts hired by The Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia Daily News. The experts evaluated photos of crowds along the parade route and at the Art Museum climax event area. See story on p.3. * Grampa includes arrivals days before parade, and day or night before, camping-out in cars or slept in homes of friends, in Airbnb accommodations, hotels and motels, and in office buildings along the parade route. * Call-for share ride services: CCT, Philadelphia County; Community Transit of Delaware County; TransNet Suburban Transit Network Inc., Montgomery County; Rover Community Transportation, Chester County.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Chester County's Five Train Stations
    Improving Chester County’s Five Train Stations October 17, 2014 Jennie Granger, AICP Bureau of Aviation, Director Pennsylvania Department of Transportation The Keystone Corridor • 14 daily weekday and 8 • 104 Mile Corridor weekend round trips • 12 Stations • On time performance > 90% • 1.46 M Passengers in FY13 • Top 10 fastest growing corridors PennDOT Goals • Improve the passenger experience to: – Increase Ridership – Decrease travel time – Create modern, attractive, and safe stations – Build a strong transit culture • Return to a state of good repair Stakeholder Roles • Amtrak – Owns and operates corridor • SEPTA – Operates on portion • Norfolk Southern – Operates on portion • PennDOT – Responsible for operations & maintenance –Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) – Receives grants for capital improvements Project Funding • FTA Commuter Rail Formula Funding – Stations – Amenities • FRA High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program (HSIPR) • All Funding Requires State Match – Act 89 helped solidify continued success Current Infrastructure Projects Grade Crossings Eliminations • $20 million to close 3 remaining public at-grade crossings • Projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2015 • Will increase safety and facilitate higher speeds Interlockings and ABS • $40 million to design and reconstruct State Interlocking in Harrisburg • $7 million to perform preliminary engineering for interlockings throughout the corridor • $1.5 million to perform preliminary engineering for Automatic Block Signaling PennDOT
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements on the Way for Chesco Train Stations
    Improvements on the way for Chesco train stations By Michaelle Bond, Inquirer Staff Writer LAST UPDATED: Saturday, October 18, 2014, 1:08 AM Plans for expanded parking, higher platforms, improved waiting areas, and other upgrades at train stations along the 104-mile Keystone Corridor will move forward within the next few years, a Pennsylvania transportation representative said Friday. Five of the 12 train stations on the Keystone Corridor, which stretches from Harrisburg to Philadelphia, are in Chester County. "A lot of these stations, nothing has been done with them since my grandfather came home from World War II," said Exton train station on the eastbound Jennie Granger, director of aviation at the Pennsylvania side. (handout photo) Department of Transportation. The stations and their surrounding towns and cities have the potential to be hubs for business and housing, said Granger, who has a background in operating train stations and helps manage the Keystone Corridor project. About 100 people, including state and township officials and developers, gathered at the Chester Valley Golf Club in Malvern for an update on the state's plan for the stations. "The Keystone Corridor is an essential backbone to Chester County's transportation," said P. Timothy Phelps, executive director of the Transportation Management Association of Chester County, which organized the gathering. The state is planning upgrades at stations in Coatesville, Downingtown, Exton, Paoli, and Parkesburg. Granger said one of the most exciting projects is the Paoli Intermodal Transportation Center. Planning for it has sped up since disability-rights activists sued Amtrak in 2012 to improve access at the Paoli station.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned October 16Th, 2012
    Keystone Corridor: Lessons Learned October 16th, 2012 Rick Robyak, P.E. Vice President, Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania The Keystone Corridor • 105 Mile Corridor • 12 Stations • 1.3 M Passengers in FY12 • Intercity and Commuter Rail • State and Amtrak Partnership Key Leaders • PennDOT Dep. Secretary for Local and Area Transportation – Toby Fauver, AICP • AMTRAK – Marilyn Jamison • SEPTA – Jeff Knueppel, P.E. • FTA – Brigid Hynes-Cherin PennDOT Goals • Improve the passenger experience – Decrease travel time – Create modern, attractive, and safe stations – Encourage ridership growth – Build a strong transit culture – Maximize Commonwealth investment by planning the entire station “area” Harrisburg Harrisburg Transportation Center Harrisburg Transportation Center Issues / Lessons Learned • Consider local viability – HBG is distressed • Get involved with developers early – before their plans have been made • Small efforts can help smooth the environmental/ historical process • Think regional intermodal Middletown Middletown Station Issues / Lessons Learned • Developers almost always have hidden agendas • Stream-line ROW acquisition • Railroad coordination – AMTRAK, NS, local Short-line Elizabethtown Elizabethtown Station AFTER BEFORE Elizabethtown Station AFTER BEFORE Elizabethtown Station Issues / Lessons Learned • Local champion (E-Town Boro) critical • ARRA Stimulus by passed link to town center – now in progress. • Fully engage Section 106 process with lead Federal Agency - FTA Mount Joy Mt. Joy Station Mt. Joy Station
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Stations
    #1–05 January 2005 Passenger Rail Stations Technical Memorandum An Element of Connecting Landscapes—the Transportation Plan for Chester County PREPARED BY THE CHESTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION C CPC The Chester County Planning Commission is developing a long range transportation plan as was recommended in LANDSCAPES, the County’s comprehensive policy plan. Connecting Landscapes will review all modes of travel and make recommendations for strategies and improvements. As the transportation plan develops, between 20 and 25 technical memorandums will be published and made available for pub- lic review. Different modes of travel will be addressed with background information, analyses, discussion of issues, and recommendations. When all technical memorandums are completed a final report will synthesize the recommendations into a plan element. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Carol Aichele Andrew E. Dinniman Donald A. Mancini Table of Contents Summary . .1 Background . .2 Methodology . .3 Conclusions . .3 Recommendations . .4 Station Profiles and Recommendations . .7 Parkesburg Station . .8 Coatesville Station . .10 Thorndale Station . .12 Downingtown Station . .14 Whitford Station . .16 Exton Station . .18 Malvern Station . .20 Paoli Station . .22 Daylesford Station . .24 Berwyn Station . .26 Devon Station . .28 Strafford Station . .30 Chester County Stations without Regular Passenger Service . .33 West Chester Station . .33 West Chester University Station . .33 Westtown Station . .33 Columbia Station . .33 Maps Map 1 | Passenger Rail Stations
    [Show full text]
  • 15-082-JHC File 2 of 3
    zone Complete NO Lamp Page 1 of 6 Lamp Line Location Relamped Pk Lot Sub Location Local Fixture Watts Type Base Cnt Fixture Watt Type Base Cnt 1 CCC Broad & Lehigh Facility 9/2/08 Parking Lot Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Mogul 9 Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Hubble High Mast 1000 HPS 80 0 80 1 CCC Elkins Park Station Parking Lot I/B Kisses 150 HPS Mogul 9 Kisses 150 HPS Hubble Magna liter 400 HPS 589 6 595 1 CCC Elkins Park Station Parking Lot O/B Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Mogul 3 Kisses 150 HPS Mogul 12 Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Kisses 150 HPS Hubble Magna liter 400 MH 0 0 0 1 CCC Fern Rock Station X Stonco 250 HPS 51 130 181 1 CCC Glenside Station 8/6/09 Parking Lot I/B Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Mogul 7 Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Stonco 250 MH 0 0 0 1 CCC Glenside Station 8/6/09 Parking Lot O/B Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Mogul 3 Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS Holophane Somerset 100 HPS 31 0 31 1 CCC Jenkintown Staton 8/10/09 Parking Lot Back Holophane Somerset 400 HPS Mogul 22 Holophane Somerset 400 HPS Holophane Somerset 100 MH 0 0 0 1 CCC Jenkintown Staton 8/10/09 Parking Lot Remote Holophane Somerset 400 HPS Mogul 24 Holophane Somerset 400 HPS Holophane Somerset 150 HPS 29 1 30 1 CCC Jenkintown Staton 8/10/09 Parking Lot Station Holophane Somerset 400 HPS Mogul 4 Holophane Somerset 400 HPS Holophane Somerset 150 MH 0 0 0 1 CCC Liberty Yard 8/7/08 Yard High Mast Hubble High Mast 1000 HPS Mogul 24 400 HPS Mogul Hubble High Mast 1000 HPS 400 HPS Holophane Somerset 250 HPS 97 41 138 1 CCC Liberty Yard Parking Lot Hubble Magna Liter 400 HPS
    [Show full text]