ANNEX 1 Chapter 5 Delivering the Vision and Strategic Policies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANNEX 1 Chapter 5 Delivering the Vision and Strategic Policies Inspector’s Initial Questions and Issues ANNEX 1 Chapter 5 Delivering the Vision and Strategic Policies Policy STP1. Spatial Priorities for Sustainable Growth Question 1. Are all the sites that will be required to meet housing needs on previously developed land? The sites that have been allocated through Policy H2 are all previously developed sites. The outstanding commitments, which provide the bulk of the forward supply of land upon which new homes will be built during the plan period, are almost entirely comprised of previously developed land. Notable exceptions include the Allerton Priory appeal site which sits within the Green Wedge (see response to question 121). Of the 25, 978 outstanding commitments referred to in Table 7 of the Submission draft Liverpool Local Plan 91.75% are on previously developed land. While the remaining 8.25% (2,143 dwellings) are on sites that comprise some elements of previously undeveloped land, the majority of these contain in some cases substantial proportions of previously developed land, particularly the 8 former school sites and in the case of the former International Garden Festival site the proposed 1, 374 dwellings are to be built on the sites developed core area. As a general rule if a the curtilage of a site of more than 0.4 hectares contained over 50% open space it has been the City Councils practice to apply an open space policy designation through the City’s existing development plan the UDP. MM Policy STP2. Sustainable Growth Principles Question 2. Despite apparently applying to all development, this policy contains a series of aspirations which cannot be met in every case. It covers a wide range of topics and applies general policy approaches which do not accurately reflect the more detailed policy contents of the individual policies or of the NPPF. This policy was written as an over-arching strategic policy that puts down markers, in the form of key principles to help ensure sustainable development. While detailed policies set out how many of the principles will be implemented, not all the themes within the policy are developed to the same degree. In particular this applies to criterion (i) and (j) which are concerned with low and zero carbon and adaptation to climate change. Liverpool, in common with many other authorities has now declared a Climate Emergency, which lends the objectives of this policy even greater importance to the City and so underlining the significance of its retention. It is accepted that as written the policy has weaknesses, and accordingly the City Council proposed change to address any issues of consistency within the local Plan or in relation to the NPPF, is set out following Question 7. Question 3. The 2012 NPPF encourages the re-use of previously developed land but does not make it a “first priority”. The use of recycled building material may be feasible in some cases but not all, so cannot be regarded as a “first priority”. The City Council considers that it has taken, as required by the NPPF account of local circumstances in the scope and content of the policy. It nevertheless recognises that the term first priority may be too prescriptive and in some cases impractical, but it should be an aspiration. The City Council proposed change, is set out following Question 7. Question 4. The policies on social inclusion and health and wellbeing are too high level to explain to a decision maker or applicant how they will be applied in individual planning applications. Inspector’s Initial Questions and Issues Health and well-being is an extremely important issue to the City Council and accordingly it is important that development proposals should have positive outcomes. However it is recognised that further detail is required. The City Council proposed change is set out following Question 7. Question 5. The concept of “no adverse impact” is not appropriate: many developments have a level of impact and there is a planning balance to be struck. The City Council agrees that there is always a planning balance to achieve but this term implies an impact that is unsustainable. It is a term frequently used, albeit with qualifications in the NPPF. The City Council proposed change is set out following Question 7. Question 6. The criterion concerning the protection of the green infrastructure network is too general. That relating to heritage assets is too general and does not properly reflect the detailed requirements of the NPPF. The same can be said of most of the rest of the policy requirements. It is acknowledged that the policy wording can be improved upon. The City Council proposed change, is set out following Question 7. Question 7. Policy STP2 is therefore ineffective and should be deleted in its entirety. It is in any case unnecessary, since there are individual policies which cover all these items in more detail. If the Council wants to make a general statement about its broad approach to sustainable development it could consider putting it into the background text. The City Council accepts that the policy could be written more effectively. It asks the Inspector to note that it considers this Policy to be one of its key statements about the nature of development proposals that are brought forward. Taking into account the points made in the questions above the City Council proposed change is : 1. New development should seek to avoid negative impacts on the environment through adoption of best practice. Where a negative effect is identified this should be mitigated by appropriate measures. Specifically. To to ensure the sustainable growth of Liverpool, the City Council will support development proposals which address, as appropriate, the following strategic economic, social and environmental principles: Economic Principles a. As a first priority, be located on previously developed land and/or re-use an existing building, seek to use secondary materials such as recycled aggregates and where appropriate aim to secure the remediation of contaminated sites; a. Contribute to delivering economic growth and ensuring a strong, responsive and competitive economy; b. Make effective use of land, including where appropriate underutilised existing land and buildings, to meet the need for homes, employment and other uses; c. Ensure no adverse impact on the operation of existing businesses in the area within which the proposed development is located; d. Make use of suitable brownfield land for new homes and other identified needs in this Plan. The City Council will also support appropriate opportunities to remediate land especially that which is derelict, contaminated or unstable to meet development needs; Inspector’s Initial Questions and Issues b. Make a positive contribution to the delivery of sustainable communities including through the promotion of social inclusion and equal opportunities in the communities in and around the area where the development is taking place; Social Principles d. Make positive improvements to health and well-being across the City e. Create or contribute to the creation, improvement or maintenance of healthy, safe, sociable and inclusive mixed and balanced communities and places; f. Make the public realm attractive as a place to be enjoyed by the whole community, which creates a sense of safety and security and helps to prevent crime and antisocial behaviour inside and outside buildings and in public spaces; g. h. Be located where it is Make the best use of locations that are already easily accessible by sustainable transport or where it that could easily be made accessible by sustainable transport including walking, cycling, public transport and by supporting the use of electric vehicles including electric vehicle charging points h. Facilitate and promote walking and cycling to increase people’s activity rates i. Avoid ‘bad neighbour’ use related problems including for example vacant premises and inactive frontages, and the cumulative impact of A5 uses (hot food takeaways) Environmental Principles j. Achieve net environmental gains, for example net gains in biodiversity, contributing to the recovery of priority species and habitats and new habitat creation; k. Improve public access to open space and sports facilities, including good quality, secure and stimulating play space, informal recreation provision and accessible natural open space which encourages greater participation in physical activity; f. Contribute to ensuring a net gain in biodiversity in the City including, where relevant, contributing to the recovery of priority species and habitats; l. Minimise environmental impact, with sustainability features incorporated into buildings, spaces and neighbourhoods at an early stage of the design process in line with and which results in the efficient use of resources generally including materials, water and energy; reduces carbon emissions and thus contributes to achieving zero carbon buildings; m. i. Deliver high quality contextual design which helps to reinforce the distinct character and identity of the various parts of the City, and results in the efficient use of resources generally including materials, water and energy; reduces carbon emissions and thus contributes to achieving zero carbon buildings; informed by an analysis of local character and the specific attributes of the site, seek to reinforce or create positive local distinctiveness and identity, whilst securing integration and coherence with the local context and which promotes opportunities for physical activity; and minimises waste, light and noise pollution; Inspector’s Initial Questions and Issues k. Avoid areas at risk of flooding and demonstrate it will not exacerbate potential sources of flood risk; n. g. Conserve and enhance the City's heritage assets including for example through development proposals which reflecting, protecting, and enhancinge the area’s historic character and environment; o. j. Is Be well adapted to the effects of climate change by for example including incorporating appropriate climate change adaption measures and meeting the highest feasible environmental standards during construction and occupation; p.
Recommended publications
  • Comments Candidates Survey
    Save Sefton Park Meadows and Liverpool Greenspaces Survey Liverpool Local Elections 2015 Additional Comments @ April 29th Statement from Liverpool Green Party: ‘All Liverpool Green Party candidates in the local and General Elections are opposed to the sale and development of Sefton Park Meadows. All Green Party candidates in the local and General Elections are opposed to development on parkland and established green spaces which are cherished by local people.’ Cllr Lawrence Brown, Greenbank Ward and agent for Martin Dobson, Riverside Parliamentary Candidate Statement from Liverpool Liberal Democrats: ‘In simple terms the answers to your questions are NO and NO! All Liberal Democrat candidates in Liverpool are campaigning against the sale of Sefton Park Meadows and other green spaces in our city. This is leading issue in our local manifesto, it's on every piece of election literature we are putting out, and our leader Richard Kemp and a number of our candidates have had major roles in the various fights across Liverpool to protect our parks and green spaces.’ Andrew Makinson, Central Liberal Democrats Office Liverpool Statement from Northwest Liberal Party: ‘In general terms we have been robustly defending parks right across the city and our party submission called for greater effort to tackle 480 Hectares brownfield, instead need to tackle long term vacant houses including triggering council tax threshold to one month as an alternative approach. If we are elected to Planning Committee we have to be careful making a pledge on a specific site as would debar us voting, as you should be aware. Steve Radford, Northwest Liberals Individual Candidate Comments: GREENBANK WARD 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Development Update
    LIVERPOOL DEVELOPMENT UPDATE November 2016 Welcome Welcome to the latest edition of Liverpool Development Update. When I became Mayor of the city in 2012, I said that Liverpool’s best days were ahead of it. If you consider the levels of investment being seen across the city today in 2016, my prediction is now ringing true. Since the start of 2012, we have seen over £3.8 billion worth of investment which has brought new businesses, new homes, new schools, and new and improved community and health facilities to Liverpool. We have seen the creation of nearly 15,000 job spaces, many of which will be filled with new jobs to the city. We have also created thousands more construction jobs. There is more good news. Several major new schemes are now in delivery mode. I am pleased to see rapid progress on Derwent’s Liverpool Shopping Park at Edge Lane, whilst Project Jennifer is now well underway with construction about to commence on its new Sainsburys and B&M stores. In addition, Neptune Developments have started work on the Lime Street Gateway project, and I can also report that work is underway on the first phase of the Welsh Streets scheme that will now see many of the traditional terraces converted to larger family homes. Meanwhile, some of the new schemes have started under the Strategic Housing Delivery Partnership which will build a further 1,500 new homes and refurbish another 1,000 existing ones. Plans for new schemes continue to be announced. The Knowledge Quarter is to be expanded with a new £1billion campus specialising in FRONT COVER: research establishments, whilst we are now also seeking to expand the Commercial Office District with new Grade A office space at Pall Mall which this city so vitally needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool John Moores University
    Programme Guide 2015/16 MA Criminal Justice PG Cert Advanced Policing Studies Liverpool John Moores University Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Welcome to Liverpool John Moores University ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction to your programme ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 What you need to know about your programme .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Using technology to enhance your learning ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Timetabling and attendance ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Your Personal Tutor ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Key contacts ................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Physical Activity Levels During School Recess: a Quasi
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity BioMed Central Research Open Access Children's physical activity levels during school recess: a quasi-experimental intervention study Nicola D Ridgers*1,3, Gareth Stratton1,3, Stuart J Fairclough2,3 and Jos WR Twisk4,5 Address: 1Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool L3 2ET, UK, 2Centre for Physical and Outdoor Education, Liverpool John Moores University, I.M. Marsh Campus, Barkhill Road, Liverpool, L17 6BD, UK, 3The REACH Group, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK, 4Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and 5Department of Methodology and Applied Biostatistics, Institute of Health Services, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Email: Nicola D Ridgers* - [email protected]; Gareth Stratton - [email protected]; Stuart J Fairclough - [email protected]; Jos WR Twisk - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 21 May 2007 Received: 2 August 2006 Accepted: 21 May 2007 International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2007, 4:19 doi:10.1186/1479- 5868-4-19 This article is available from: http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/4/1/19 © 2007 Ridgers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Recess provides a daily opportunity for children to engage in moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA) and vigorous physical activity (VPA).
    [Show full text]
  • NACS Code Practice Name N82054 Abercromby Health Centre N82086
    NACS Code Practice Name N82054 Abercromby Health Centre N82086 Abingdon Family Health Centre N82053 Aintree Park Group Practice N82095 Albion Surgery N82103 Anfield Group Practice N82647 Anfield Health - Primary Care Connect N82094 Belle Vale Health Centre N82067 Benim MC N82671 Bigham Road MC N82078 Bousfield Health Centre N82077 Bousfield Surgery N82117 Brownlow Group Practice N82093 Derby Lane MC N82033 Dingle Park Practice N82003 Dovecot HC N82651 Dr Jude’s Practice Stanley Medical Centre N82646 Drs Hegde and Jude's Practice N82662 Dunstan Village Group Practice N82065 Earle Road Medical Centre N82024 West Derby Medical Centre N82022 Edge Hill MC N82018 Ellergreen Medical Centre N82113 Fairfield General Practice N82676 Fir Tree Medical Centre N82062 Fulwood Green MC N82050 Gateacre Medical Centre N82087 Gillmoss Medical Centre N82009 Grassendale Medical Practice N82669 Great Homer Street Medical Centre N82090 Green Lane MC N82079 Greenbank Rd Surgery N82663 Hornspit MC N82116 Hunts Cross Health Centre N82081 Islington House Surgery N82083 Jubilee Medical Centre N82101 Kirkdale Medical Centre N82633 Knotty Ash MC N82014 Lance Lane N82019 Langbank Medical Centre N82110 Long Lane Medical Centre N82001 Margaret Thompson M C N82099 Mere Lane Practice N82655 Moss Way Surgery N82041 Oak Vale Medical Centre N82074 Old Swan HC N82026 Penny Lane Surgery N82089 Picton Green N82648 Poulter Road Medical Centre N82011 Priory Medical Centre N82107 Queens Drive Surgery N82091 GP Practice Riverside N82058 Rock Court Surgery N82664 Rocky Lane Medical
    [Show full text]
  • Greenbank Drive, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L10 4UE £89,000
    Greenbank Drive, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L10 4UE £89,000 Grosvenor Waterford are delighted to offer for sale this 2 bedroom townhouse situated on a popular, modern residential estate. The well presented accommodation briefly comprises; entrance hall, lounge, and dining kitchen. To the first floor there are two good sized bedrooms and a family bathroom. Outside there is a pleasant rear garden and open plan front garden with off road parking. The property also benefits from uPVC double glazing and gas central heating and is offered with the added advantage of no ongoing chain. Perfect for a first time buyer. Must be viewed. Entrance Hall uPVC front door, laminate flooring, radiator, stairs to first floor Lounge 13'10" x 10'2" (4.22m x 3.12m) uPVC double glazed window to front aspect, radiator, living flame gas fire in feature surround Kitchen Diner 13'7" x 6'7" (4.16m x 2.01m) modern fitted kitchen with a range of base and wall units with complementary worktops, integrated oven and hob with extractor over, plumbing for washing machine, tiled splashbacks, cupboard housing boiler, understairs storage, uPVC door to rear garden, uPVC double glazed window to rear aspect First Floor Landing access to loft space Bedroom 1 13'6" (max) x 10'6" (4.14m (max) x 3.22m) uPVC double glazed window to front aspect, radiator, built in cupboard Bedroom 2 10'1" x 7'0" (3.09m x 2.14m) uPVC double glazed window to rear aspect, radiator Family Bathroom 6'9" x 6'3" (2.06m x 1.93m) modern fitted bathroom comprising; low level w.c., pedestal sink, panelled bath with
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool District Local Integrated Risk Management Plan 2010/2011
    APPENDIX B (CFO/057/10) Liverpool District Local Integrated Risk Management Plan 2010/2011 Contents 1. Foreword 2. Our Purpose, Aims and Core Values 3. Introduction 4. Liverpool’s Story of Place 5. Our Plans to Reduce Risk and to Address Local Priorities in Liverpool • Liverpool Community Gyms • Liverpool East Community Garden • Street Based Teams • Liverpool South Speke Community Gardens • Neighbourhood Firefighters • TAG Rugby • Healthy Watch • Generic Action Point - Fitness and Health • Generic Action Point – Corporate Social Responsibility • Generic Action Point - Carbon Footprint • Generic Action Point – Equality and Diversity 6. Conclusion 7. Appendix A Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Local Performance Indicators. 8. Appendix B Liverpool Local Area Priority National Indicators 9. Appendix C Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Liverpool District Management Structure. Contact Information Liverpool Management Team Position Name Email Contact District Manager Dave Mottram [email protected] 0151 296 4714 District Manager Richard Davis [email protected] 0151 296 4622 NM East Kevin Johnson NM South Ken Ross NM SouthCentral Sara Lawton NM North+City Paul Murphy NM Alt Valley Kevin Firth Liverpool 1st Rob Taylor Liverpool Fire Stations Station Address Contact 10 – Kirkdale Studholme Street, Liverpool, L20 8EQ 0151 296 5375 11 – City Centre St Anne Street, Liverpool, L3 3DS 0151 296 6250 12 – Low Hill West Derby Road, Liverpool, L6 2AE 0151 296 5415 13 – Allerton Mather Avenue, Allerton, Liverpool, L18 6HE 0151 296
    [Show full text]
  • At-Home COVID-19 Testing Kit (PCR)
    We are busy updating our site to make it an even better experience for you. Normal service will resume on Sunday evening. In the meantime if you wish to purchase an At-home COVID-19 testing kit, then follow the instructions detailed below. If you wish to purchase an At-home COVID-19 testing kit you will need to do so in store during the period above. Please see the list of stores that stock this test kit at the bottom of this document. MyHealthChecked At-home COVID-19 PCR test What is a MyHealthChecked At-Home COVID-19 PCR Swab Test? The MyHealthChecked At-home COVID-19 PCR test is an easy to use, nasal self-swab test to help identify if you have the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. This test can be used for both general testing and international travel, where a Fit to Fly certificate is required. You must check with your travel provider exactly what your requirements are before ordering, as requirements and timings can vary greatly from country to country. The test is also suitable for individuals prior to making decisions such as travel or meeting with friends or family, or someone who needs to prove a negative test result for group attendance. Who is this test suitable for? The MyHealthChecked At-home COVID-19 PCR test is suitable for all ages and can be used by both adults and children. Adults aged 18 and over: self-test (unless unable to do so). Children and teenagers aged 12 to 17: self-test with adult supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Made at Greenspaces Review Meeting for Greenbank, Mossley Hill and Church Wards (20 March 2015)
    Green Spaces Review meeting for Greenbank, Mossley Hill and Church wards Held on Friday 20 March 2015 (18:30 – 20:00), at the Merseyside Police Recreational Ground, Riversdale Road, Grassendale Over 90 people present. (Comments in italics are my own comments/interpretations). Simon O’Brien (SOB) chairing the meeting, introduced the Review members present, who included David Hughes (the recently appointed Head of the Planning Department, in Liverpool). SOB outlined how the Review came about. As well as the meetings being held this month, a series of workshops are planned. After the meetings, workshops and site visits, SOB will report back to the Mayor in June. Later in the year, there will be four meetings- north, south, east and west. Opened up to floor for comments, questions and discussion. Councillor Richard Kemp (RK) (Liberal Democrat Councillor for Church Ward) gave apologies for Councillor Erica Kemp, who due to her role as Lord Mayor is unable to attend. He mentioned that he was specifically here to talk about the Calderstones area (which falls within the ward he represents). He also mentioned that if Liverpool is to do well, we need to maintain a green and pleasant land. Does not agree with the assertion that Liverpool has too much Green Space. Believes that what we need is high quality Green Space. RK also questioned the Local Plan, and the sites listed as potential development sites. Does not agree that the sites are surplus to requirements. Reported that Beechley stables have recently only been given a three year lease by the Council, and have been offered another site (which the sale of Beechley will pay for).
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool District Local Integrated Risk Management Plan 2011/2012
    Liverpool District Local Integrated Risk Management Plan 2011/2012 2 Contents 1. Foreword 2. Our Purpose, Aims and Core Values 3. Introduction 4. Liverpool’s Story of Place 5. Our Plans to Reduce Risk and to Address Local Priorities in Liverpool 6. Conclusion 7. Appendix C Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service Liverpool District Management Structure. 3 Contact Information Liverpool Management Team Position Name Email Contact District Manager Allan Harris [email protected] 0151 296 4711 District Manager Richard Davis [email protected] 0151 296 4622 NM East/Alt Valley Kevin Johnson [email protected] 07837476441 NM South Mark Thomas [email protected] 07801273137 NM South Central Sara Lawton [email protected] 07837475768 NM North+ City Paul Hitchin [email protected] 07970566857 Liverpool 1st Rob Taylor [email protected] 07837655539 District Manager Allan Harris [email protected] 0151 296 4711 Liverpool Fire Stations Station Address Contact 10 – Kirkdale Studholme Street, Liverpool, L20 8EQ 0151 296 5375 11 – City Centre St Anne Street, Liverpool, L3 3DS 0151 296 6250 12 – Kensington Beech Street, Liverpool, L7 0EU 0151 296 5415 13 – Allerton Mather Avenue, Allerton, Liverpool, L18 6HE 0151 296 5865 14 – Speke/Garston Cartwright’s Farm Road, Speke, Liverpool, L24 1UY 0151 296 6750 15 – Toxteth High Park Street, Liverpool, L8 8DX 0151 296 5835 16 – Old Swan 628 Queens Drive, Old Swan, Liverpool, L13 5UD 0151 296 5725 17 – Belle Vale Childwall Valley Road, Belle Vale, Liverpool, L25 2PY 0151 296 6600 18 – Aintree Longmoor Lane, Aintree, Liverpool, L9 0EN 0151 296 5695 19 – Croxteth Storrington Avenue, Croxteth, Liverpool, L11 9AP 0151 296 5595 Stations Overlapping Into Liverpool Station Address Contact 40 – Huyton Huyton Lane, Huyton, Liverpool, L36 7XG 0151 296 5445 42 - Kirkby Webster Drive, Kirkby, L32 8SJ 0151 296 5505 4 1.
    [Show full text]
  • City Centre Summer 2018
    Neighbourhood Profiles City Centre Summer 2018 1 | Page READER INFORMATION Title Neighbourhood Profiles Team Liverpool CCG Business Intelligence Team; Liverpool City Council Public Health Epidemiology Team Author(s) Andrea Hutchinson, Sophie Kelly, and Kate Hodgkiss Contributor(s) Liverpool City Council Social Services Analysis Team; Liverpool Community Health Analysis Team Reviewer(s) Neighbourhood Clinical Leads; Locality Clinical Leads; Liverpol CCG Primary Care Team; Liverpool CCG Business Intelligence Team: Liverpool City Council Public Health Team; Liverpool Community Health Intelligence and Public Health Teams Circulated to Neighbourhood Clinical and Managerial Leads; Liverpool GP Bulletin; Liverpool CCG employees including Primary Care Team and Programme Managers; Adult Social Services (LCC); Public Health (LCC); Liverpool Community Health Version 1.0 Status Final Date of release July 2018 Review date To be confirmed Purpose The packs are intended to support Health and Social Care partners to understand the neighbourhoods they serve. They will support neighbourhoods in understanding health inequalities that may exist for their population and subsequently how they may want to configure services around patients. Description This series of reports contain intelligence about each of the reconfigured 12 General Practice Neighbourhoods in Liverpool. The information benchmarks each neighbourhood against its peers so they can understand the the relative need, management and service utilisation of people in their area. The pack contains information on wider determinants of health, health, social care and community services. Reference JSNA Documents The Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) identifies the key issues affecting the health and wellbeing of local people, both now and in the future. The JSNA looks at the strategic needs of Liverpool, as well as issues such as inequalities between different populations who live in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Im Marsh Campus Site Aigburth Vision Document (Nov 2018) 2 Im Marsh Campus Ljmu, Aigburth Vision Document 2 Im Marsh Campus Ljmu, Aigburth Vision Document 3
    Appendix 1 Site Vision Document – I.M Marsh Campus IM MARSH CAMPUS SITE AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT (NOV 2018) 2 IM MARSH CAMPUS LJMU, AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT 2 IM MARSH CAMPUS LJMU, AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT 3 CONTENTS Executive Summary........................................................................ 04 Understanding the Site................................................................... 06 Sustainable Location...................................................................... 08 Unique Design Opportunity............................................................ 10 Deliverable Phasing Strategy........................................................... 12 Steps to Delivery............................................................................. 14 4 IM MARSH CAMPUS LJMU, AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure 2: Site Location Plan Liverpool John Moores University’s (LJMU’s) campus at IM Marsh presents a unique regeneration opportunity. It should be redeveloped for high quality housing. This will respond to a critical need in South Liverpool. Housing use will enable the beneficial use of the listed building and redevelopment of City Campus (LJMU) the remainder of the site provides an opportunity to deliver high quality apartment development alongside large family housing, including 4 and 5 bedroom properties with gardens. The IM Marsh Campus comprises various university buildings, that range in age and quality, and three sports pitches. The buildings on the Site will be surplus to academic requirements, following the planned transfer of faculties to the Copperas Hill site in the City Centre. The buildings are relatively low quality both visually and physically, apart from two historic buildings. The previously developed land on the Site represents c.50% of the total Site area. The remaining Site area comprises sports pitches which LJMU are currently developing a strategy to relocate near to the City Centre Campus. These planned improvements are part of LJMU’s wider vision to deliver a walkable campus within Liverpool City Centre.
    [Show full text]