The Knightly Art an Overview of European Martial Arts in the Late Middle Ages

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Knightly Art an Overview of European Martial Arts in the Late Middle Ages The Knightly Art An Overview of European Martial Arts in the Late Middle Ages © 2006 Gregory D. Mele Introduction The history of personal combat has usually been relegated to fencing historians, who in turn defined medieval combat as rough, untutored fighting 1 on the battlefield, between nobles, whereas truly scientific, systematic, and civilian martial arts arose with rapier fencing in the mid- 16th century. It was perhaps inevitable that as most fin de siecle fencing historians looked at the evidence they had available to them, they looked at the records of the medieval masters-at-arms, and simply didn’t see what they thought of as fencing. Fencing derives from the word defense, and since the Middle “ges had simply meant the art of defense, specifically when armed with any hand weapon, be that a sword, knife or quarterstaff, be that in a duel, a street brawl or on a battlefield. But by the late 19th century, the art of fencing focused on single-combat within the formal, and increasingly non-lethal, duel. For most, training was really only for the friendly combat-sport that had grown out of the martial art. Broadsword, heavy saber and bayonet fencing continued to be practiced, but usually only by current or former military men, and with increasingly less frequency, as the revolver at last made the sword completely obsolete on the battlefield. Even in military fencing, the aesthetics of the age meant that grappling and in-fighting was strictly forbidden in the fencing salle. Unarmed combat was a separate discipline, divided into boxing and wrestling, each of which were also increasingly had their sportive, rather than defensive, applications as a focus. What was taught? In contrast, the medieval master-at-arms taught cognate martial arts: complete systems of armed and unarmed defense, designed for both the battlefield and personal defense. Their diverse curriculum combined unarmed and weapons combat, both in and out of armour, fought both on foot and on horseback. Training in this robust art was usually based on a foundation in close- quarter combat and swordsmanship. Close-quarter combat was itself comprised of two key components: wrestling and dagger combat. As a battlefield art, wrestling was particularly aggressive, focusing on ending a fight quickly through either joint-breaking, throws or lethal force, rather than seeking submission. Dagger combat was split between unarmed defenses against the dagger and dagger vs. dagger dueling; a far more likely scenario for the 15th century knife-fighter than it is for his 21st century counterpart. Swordsmanship formed the basis for training with all long, hand-weapons. The central weapon was usually either the longsword or the sword and buckler. The longsword, often called a hand-and-a-half sword by modern arms and armour enthusiasts, was a fairly new weapon that had appeared in the 13th century. The first sword to offer a two-handed grip, it generally 1 see Egerton Castle, Schools and Masters of Fence from the Middle Ages to the 18th Centur, Dover (reprint), 2003. p. 9 measured between 44" and 54" [112 and 137 cm] in length, and was stout enough to combat fully armoured foes, yet at roughly three to four pounds [1.4-1.8 kg] in weight, it was also fast enough to use against lightly armoured and unarmoured opponents. Like the older sword it evolved from, the longsword’s straight, double-edged blade was ideally suited for both cutting and thrusting, and could be flat and wide, narrow and hexagonal, or diamond shaped in cross- section. This versatility made the weapon extremely popular with the knightly classes; so much so that this so-called sword of war also became an element of civilian dress in the late Middle Ages and Renaissance. The older, one-handed or arming” sword continued alongside the longsword, and when combined with the buckler, a small hand shield measuring between and to cm, was the other common exemplar weapon for the medieval fencing instructor. Sword and buckler was a common sidearm for common soldiers and travelers, and fencing with them was a popular medieval sport especial with university students often to their professor’s horror.) Through the use of these weapons the master taught all of the basic blows, defenses, entering techniques and disarms of his martial art. Full plate armour had been developed by 1400, and was virtually impervious to sword cuts. To defeat this, the master-at-arms taught how to turn the sword into a short spear by gripping the blade in the left hand; this allowed it to be strongly thrust into gaps in the armour. This shortened sword or half-sword combat also included a number of disarms, throws and wrestling techniques, very similar to those taught with the dagger. Through these techniques, the student linked the lessons of close-quarter combat, armoured combat and swordsmanship. This formed a basis for fighting with the spear, the poleaxe a .’ to ’ two-handed axe or warhammer, similar to the halberd) and mounted combat. It was a diverse and complex martial art, perfectly in keeping with the ethos of the warrior culture that created it. What survives today? Sadly, these martial arts were victims of the same pragmatic culture that produced them. As the nature of both warfare and personal defense evolved what was no longer useful was abandoned. Although many of the older medieval weapons continued to be taught and practiced throughout the Renaissance, by the turn of the 18th century their use seems to have survived in only a few places as traditional curiosities. Today, there are a number of traditional European styles of stick-combat whose histories claim descent from the two-handed swordplay of the late Middle Ages, such as French grand baton or Portuguese jogo do pau. But in reality, there is no documental or lineage evidence and very little technical or lexiconal proof to support these claims, or show that any of these arts have a clear origin prior to the 18th century. A number of folk wrestling traditions surviving throughout Europe, such as those of Iceland, Cornwall or Brittany, some with claims of great antiquity to their art. Unfortunately, folk culture is oral culture, so there is little way to verify these claims. While, not surprisingly, there sometimes are a number of similar throws, holds and takedowns found between all surviving forms of Western wrestling and the medieval material, the techniques of the medieval masters were battlefield arts, not sportive ones. Consequently, the medieval material focuses on ending the fight immediately through a use of strikes, joint-breaks, chokes and potentially lethal throws; most of which are banned for safety in folk and Greco-Roman wrestling. There is also fairly little ground-fighting, which is a key element of most modern grappling. Although these folk traditions certainly may have grown from, or in parallel to, those taught by the medieval masters- at-arms, they have less in common with their curriculum than do most modern close-quarter combatives. What do we have, and where does it come from? The medieval masters-at-arms arts did not survive the centuries as a living tradition, but fortunately, they were prolific writers. By the turn of the 15th century, an entire corpus of fencing treatises documents not only the presence of highly developed cognate martial arts, but actual fencing guilds, whose masters were plying their trades in cities, universities, and courts throughout Europe. Surviving fencing manuscripts from Germany, Italy, England, Spain, Portugal, and Burgundy give us a detailed, and often reconstructable, look at martial arts more than half a millennia old. Of these, the lion's share of the medieval material are German and Italian treatises. Liechtenauer's Legacy. The surviving record of European swordplay begins with a unique, south German manuscript, Royal Armouries Ms. I.33,2 dated to c.1295. This curious manuscript, written by an anonymous priest, shows a cleric teaching his scholar, or student, sword and buckler combat. The manuscript is comprised of captioned illustrations that teach a clear, well-developed and elucidated system of combat. It also refers obliquely to a common method of swordplay, but does not describe how its own instructions might relate, or differ, from that method. While Ms. I. is a sophisticated text, when looking at it from our side of history, it’s hard not to see the anonymous priest as something of a medieval one hit wonder. Despite other German sword and buckler styles some common guards and techniques, and a few later manuscripts that seem to show small sections copied from Ms. I.33, there is no real, clear historical evidence that the priest’s art survived him in any kind of established tradition. The first evidence of a continuous, European tradition begins two generations later, with the German grandmaster, Johannes Liechtenauer. We know virtually nothing of this man, aside from shreds of data left by his students and their descendants. Johannes Liechtenauer was born sometime in the first half of the 14th century, possibly in Liechtenau, Franconia, but his actual birthplace, family and rank remain unknown. He traveled through the Holy Roman Empire (modern Germany, Austria, Switzerland and northern Italy) and Eastern Europe for a number of years, training with local masters and synthesizing their teachings into a new method. His primary weapon was the longsword, but his direct teachings also include wrestling, dagger and spear fighting, both in and out of armour. By the later 1300s, Liechtenauer had settled down and begun to teach, precisely where is unknown, although Swabia or Austria are likely. Tradition has it that he gathered a circle of 2 Ms.
Recommended publications
  • The European Bronze Age Sword……………………………………………….21
    48-JLS-0069 The Virtual Armory Interactive Qualifying Project Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation by _____________________________ ____________________________ Patrick Feeney Jennifer Baulier _____________________________ Ian Fite February 18th 2013 Professor Jeffrey L. Forgeng. Major Advisor Keywords: Higgins Armory, Arms and Armor, QR Code 1 Abstract This project explored the potential of QR technology to provide interactive experiences at museums. The team developed content for selected objects at the Higgins Armory Museum. QR codes installed next to these artifacts allow visitors to access a variety of minigames and fact pages using their mobile devices. Facts for the object are selected randomly from a pool, making the experience different each time the code is scanned, and the pool adapts based on artifacts visited, personalizing the experience. 2 Contents Contents........................................................................................................................... 3 Figures..............................................................................................................................6 Introduction ……………………………………………......................................................... 9 Double Edged Swords In Europe………………………………………………………...21 The European Bronze Age Sword……………………………………………….21 Ancient edged weapons prior to the Bronze Age………………………..21 Uses of European Bronze Age swords, general trends, and common innovations
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Fiore Dei Liberi's Spear Plays
    Acta Periodica Duellatorum, Hands On section, articles 131 Interpretation of Fiore dei Liberi’s Spear Plays Jakub Dobi Ars Ensis [email protected] Abstract – How did Fiore Furlano use a spear? What is the context, purpose, and effect of entering a duel armed with a spear? My article- originally a successful thesis work for an Ars Ensis Free Scholler title- describes in detail what I found out by studying primary sources (Fiore’s works), related sources (contemporary and similar works), and hands-on experience in controlled play practice, as well as against uncooperative opponents. In this work I cover the basics- how to hold the spear, how to assume Fiore’s stances, how to attack, and how to defend yourself. I also argue that the spear is not, in fact, a preferable weapon to fence with in Fiore’s system, at least not if one uses it in itself. It is however, a reach advantage that has to be matched, and thus the terribly (mutually) unsafe situation of spear versus spear occurs. As a conclusion, considering context and illustrations of spear fencing, I argue that the spear is only to be considered paired with other weapons, like dagger, or sword. In fact, following Fiore’s logic, we can assume he used the spear to close the distance to use a weapon he feels more in control with. Keywords – Fiore, Furlano, Liberi, Italian, duel, spear, Ars Ensis I. PROCESS OF RESEARCH The article itself is largely devoted to trying to point out the less obvious points to make about this specific style of spear fencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiore Dei Liberi: 14Th Century Master of Defence
    ARMA Historical Study Guide: Fiore Dei Liberi: 14th century Master of Defence By John Clements Unarguably the most important Medieval Italian fighting treatise, the work of Fiore Dei Liberi forms a cornerstone of historical fencing studies. Like many other martial arts treatises from the Medieval and Renaissance eras, we must look analytically at the totality of the author’s teachings. In doing so we come to understand how, rather than consolidating information compartmentally, its manner of technical writing disperses it throughout. In circa 1409, a northern Italian knight and nobleman, Fiore dei Liberi, produced a systematic martial arts treatise that has come to be considered one of the most important works of its kind on close-combat skills. Methodically illustrated and pragmatically presented, his teachings reveal a sophisticated and deadly fighting craft. It is one of the most unique and important texts in the history of fencing and of our Western martial heritage. Master Fiore’s manuscript is today the primary source of study for reconstruction of Italian longsword fencing, combat grappling, and dagger fighting. It currently constitutes the earliest known Italian fencing manual and one of only two so far discovered from the era. Along with dagger and tapered longsword (spadone or spada longa), his work includes armored and unarmored grappling, poleax, mounted combat, and specialized weapons as well as unarmored spear, stick, and staff. His spear (or lance) fighting on foot is a matter of holding sword postures while thrusting or deflecting. His longsword fencing techniques include half- swording, pommel strikes, blade grabbing, disarms, trapping holds, throws, groin kicks, knee stomps, defense against multiple opponents, timed blows to push or leverage the adversary off balance, and even sword throwing.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Review !1/!76
    Guy Windsor Critical Review !1/!76 Recreating Medieval and Renaissance European combat systems: A Critical Review of Veni Vadi Vici, Mastering the Art of Arms vol 1: The Medieval Dagger, and The Duel- list’s Companion, Submitted for examination for the degree of PhD by Publication. Guy Windsor Ipswich, July 2017 !1 Guy Windsor Critical Review !2/!76 Table of Contents Introduction 3 The Primary Sources for the Submitted Works 20 Methodology 37 Results: The Submitted Works 42 Conclusion 60 Works Cited 69 !2 Guy Windsor Critical Review !3/!76 Introduction The aims of this research on historical methods of combat are threefold: historical knowl- edge for its own sake, the reconstruction of these lost combat arts, and the development of pedagogical methods by which these arts can be taught. The objectives are to develop and present working interpretations of three particular sources, Fiore dei Liberi’s Il Fior di Battaglia (1410) Philippo Vadi’s De Arte Gladiatoria Dimicandi (ca 1480) and Ridolfo Capo- ferro’s Gran Simulacro (1610). By “working interpretations” I mean a clear and reasonably complete training method for acquiring the necessary skills to execute these styles of swordsmanship in practice: so a technical, tactical, and pedagogical method for each style. The methodology includes transcription and translation (where necessary), close reading, tropological analysis, practical experiment, technical practice, and presentation of findings. The results include but are not limited to the three publications submitted for examination, which are: Veni Vadi Vici, published in 2012, which is a transcription, translation and commentary on De Arte Gladiatoria Dimicandi: this has been extensively corrected and updated, and re- submitted for a second examination after which it will be published.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Shared for Private Use Only – Republication, in Part Or in Whole, in Print Or Online, Is Expressly Forbidden Without the Written Consent of the Author
    The International Armizare Society Presents: Beginning Armizare An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship Gregory D. Mele © 2001 - 2016 Beginning Armizare: An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship Copyright Notice: © 2014 Gregory D. Mele, All Rights Reserved. This document may be downloaded and shared for private use only – republication, in part or in whole, in print or online, is expressly forbidden without the written consent of the author. ©2001-2016 Gregory D. Mele Page 2 Beginning Armizare: An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 4 Introduction: The Medieval Art of Arms 5 I. Spada a Dui Mani: The Longsword 7 II. Stance and Footwork 9 III. Poste: The Guards of the Longsword 14 IV. Learning to Cut with the Longsword 17 V. Defending with the Fendente 23 VI. Complex Blade Actions 25 VII. Parrata e Risposta 25 Appendix A: Glossary 28 Appendix B: Bibliography 30 Appendix C: Armizare Introductory Class Lesson Plan 31 ©2001-2016 Gregory D. Mele Page 3 Beginning Armizare: An Introduction to Medieval Swordsmanship FOREWORD The following document was originally developed as a study guide and training companion for students in the popular "Taste of the Knightly Arts" course taught by the Chicago Swordplay Guild. It has been slightly revised, complete with the 12 class outline used in that course in order to assist new teachers, small study groups or independent students looking for a way to begin their study of armizare. Readers should note that by no means is this a complete curriculum. There is none of the detailed discussion of body mechanics, weight distribution or cutting mechanics that occurs during classroom instruction, nor an explanation of the number of paired exercises that are used to develop student's basic skills, outside of the paired techniques, or "set-plays," themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Federazione Italiana Scherma Federation
    FEDERAZIONE ITALIANA SCHERMA Stampa: 27/04/2013 18:12 FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE D'ESCRIME Fioretto maschile a squadre Gran Premio Assoluti ANCONA - Camp. Italiani serie C FM-SCM Denominazione Sigla Località Classific 1 A.S.D. POL. PODJGYM AVELLINO AVGYM AVELLINO 2 -12,00 2 A.S.PICCOLO TEATRO MILANO A.S.D. MIPIT MILANO 3 -6,00 3 P.G.S. - I.M.A. A.S.D. BOLOGNA BOIMA BOLOGNA 4 -2,00 4 CLUB SCHERMA FIRENZE A.S.D. FICSF FIRENZE 5 -3,00 5 ACCADEMIA SCHERMA PESCARA ASD PEACC PESCARA 6 -8,00 6 G.S. ARIBERTO CELI MESSINA A.S.D. MECEL MESSINA 7 -9,00 7 CLUB SCHERMA VIAREGGIO A.S.D. LUCSV VIAREGGIO 8 -13,00 8 FIORE DEI LIBERI CIVIDALE UD UDFDL CIVIDALE DEL FRIULI 9 -4,00 9 PENTAMODENA A.S.D. MOPEN MODENA 10 -7,00 10 COMENSE SCHERMA S.S.D. A R.L. COCOM COMO 11 -1,00 11 G.S. "P. GIANNONE" CEGIA CASERTA 12 -11,00 12 ACCADEMIA SCHERMA SPOLETO A.S.D. PGSPO SPOLETO 14 -5,00 13 FOGGIA FENCING ATENEO DI SCHERMA FGFEN FOGGIA 16 -10,00 Pagina 1 di 1 Mod.P.10 SW a cura della TE.S.I.S. di Saverio Tedeschi - Var.SS 115 n.23 - Modica (RG) - Italy - [email protected] - 333-3497135 FEDERAZIONE ITALIANA SCHERMA Gran Premio Assoluti FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE D'ESCRIME Fioretto maschile a squadre ANCONA - Camp. ItalianiStampa: serie C27/04/2013 FM-SCM 18:12 Cod.Soc. Società Sigla Sq.1 Sq.2 Sq.3 Punt. Diff. Stocc.
    [Show full text]
  • Armizare, 1409 an Examination of Fiore Dei Liberi
    Raziskava o Fioreju dei liberi in njegovih razpravah, ki opisujejo L`arte dell`armizare, 1409 An examination of Fiore dei liberi and his treatises describing L`arte dell`armizare, c. 1409 • D AVI D M . C V E T B.Sc., Founder and Head Instructor Academy of European Medieval Martial Arts, 927 Dupont St., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON M6H 1Z1, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Izvleček Excerpt Zapuščini Fioreja dei Liberi, nastali pred Fiore dei Liberi’s legacy created 600 years ago is 600 leti, je v 21. stoletju izkazana čast s skrb- honoured in the 21st century with the careful recon- no rekonstrukcijo in ponovno oživitvijo boril- struction and resurrection of the fighting art he de- ne veščine, ki jo je opisal v svojih razpravah z scribed in his treatises entitled “Flos Duellatorum” naslovom Flos Duellatorum in Fior di Battaglia. and “Fior Battaglia”. This paper will explore the Ta spis raziskuje moža po imenu Fiore in pred- man who bore the name Fiore and conduct a brief stavlja kratko primerjalno analizo treh različic comparative analysis of the three versions of the razprave. Te razprave veljajo za pomembne te- treatise. The treatises are considered important cor- melje današnjih raziskav in rekonstrukcij zgo- nerstones in today’s research and reconstruction of dovinskih borilnih veščin zahoda zaradi svoje historical Western fighting arts given their collection zbirke ilustracij, ki neverjetno jasno pričajo o of illustrations possessing remarkable clarity in con- izročilu te veščine, vsako ilustracijo pa spre- veying the concepts in the art, and the informative mljajo informativna besedila. text accompanying each illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • By Peter Dell ' O Rto and S Ean Punch
    BY P ETER D ELL’ORTO AND S EAN P UNCH Written by PETER DELL’ORTO and SEAN PUNCH Additional Material by VOLKER BACH and C.J. CARELLA Edited by SEAN PUNCH Cover Art by BOB STEVLIC Illustrated by ABRAR AJMAL and BOB STEVLIC ISBN 978-1-55634-762-7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STEVE JACKSON GAMES Committed Attack . 99 Defensive Attack. 100 Evaluate . 100 Feint . 100 ONTENTS Ready . 101 C Who Draws First?. 103 Move . 105 Realism Level . 29 INTRODUCTION . 4 Move and Attack . 107 Beginning Students as PCs. 30 Publication History . 4 Wait . 108 About the Authors . 4 CHARACTER TEMPLATES . 31 ADDITIONAL COMBAT OPTIONS . 109 Del Duque (350 points) . 33 Melee Attack Options . 109 1. HISTORY . 5 Frauds . 35 A Matter of Inches . 110 Adrian Froste (200 points) . 37 TIMELINE . 6 Untrained Fighters . 113 Kai Lian (250 points) . 39 ASIA . 8 Close-Combat Options. 114 China . 8 ADVANTAGES, DISADVANTAGES, Teeth. 115 Xia . 8 AND SKILLS . 42 Grab and Smash! . 118 Monks and Martial Arts . 9 Advantages . 42 Ranged Attack Options . 119 India . 10 Desirable Advantages . 43 Rapid Fire with Thrown Weapons. 120 Northern vs. Southern Kung Fu . 10 Chi Powers for Martial Artists . 46 Active Defense Options . 121 Religion, Philosophy, and Fists . 11 Perks . 49 Harsh Realism for Indonesian Archipelago. 12 Disadvantages. 53 Unarmed Fighters . 124 Japan . 12 Common Disadvantages. 53 CINEMATIC COMBAT . 125 Ryu . 12 Skills . 54 Multiple Attacks . 126 Ninja: Legend vs. History . 13 Combat Skills . 55 Chambara Fighting . 128 Korea. 14 Wildcard Skills for Styles . 60 Mind Games . 130 Other Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Xvi Cent. Italian Partisan and Spetum
    XVI CENT. ITALIAN PARTISAN AND SPETUM SOURCES ACHILLE MAROZZO, Opera Nova, book IV, 1536 ANTONIO MANCIOLINO, Opera Nova, book VI, 1531 FRANCESCO ALTONI, Monomachia, book II, XVI cent RELATORS Andrea Morini & Devis Carli – SALA D'ARME ACHILLE MAROZZO Polearms are metal weapons put on a very long wooden shaft (which can be reinforced by metal strips) in order to increase their offensive and defensive distance. Their shapes heavily depend on the type of polearm, place and date of fabrication. Dimensions vary depending on the type of weapon. Since the shafts were made of wood, which is a very perishable material, we don’t have many original weapons. Most of them are blades put on a new shaft, or blades alone. The peculiarity of these weapons is their length, which influences offensive, defensive potential and wielding. Agriculture tools were used in war even without modification, but were only slightly improved to reach their full performance as weapons. In the treatises is fairly common the use of: poleaxe, halberd, bill, spetum, partesan, big partesan, spear and pike. ANDREA MORINI & DEVIS CARLI XVI CENT. ITALIAN PARTISAN AND SPETUM PARTISAN Pietro Monte (Book I, Chap. 1) tells us the partisan is a roughly two meters long weapon, that is to say the distance from ground level to the raised hand of a man. The partisan had a simple triangular blade, put on a square or octagonal (says Francesco Altoni) shaft. Both its edges were sharp. Two prongs (curved little wings) were later added in the blade’s base. The first kind of partisans (without prongs) disappeared during the XVII century, while a lot of the second kind (with prongs), with maybe a better finish and slightly more decorative, managed to survive.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Technology in the 12Th Century
    Zurich Model United Nations MILITARY TECHNOLOGY IN THE 12TH CENTURY The following list is a compilation of various sources and is meant as a refer- ence guide. It does not need to be read entirely before the conference. The breakdown of centralized states after the fall of the Roman empire led a number of groups in Europe turning to large-scale pillaging as their primary source of income. Most notably the Vikings and Mongols. As these groups were usually small and needed to move fast, building fortifications was the most efficient way to provide refuge and protection. Leading to virtually all large cities having city walls. The fortifications evolved over the course of the middle ages and with it, the battle techniques and technology used to defend or siege heavy forts and castles. Designers of castles focused a lot on defending entrances and protecting gates with drawbridges, portcullises and barbicans as these were the usual week spots. A detailed ref- erence guide of various technologies and strategies is compiled on the following pages. Dur- ing the third crusade and before the invention of gunpowder the advantages and the balance of power and logistics usually favoured the defender. Another major advancement and change since the Roman empire was the invention of the stirrup around 600 A.D. (although wide use is only mentioned around 900 A.D.). The stirrup enabled armoured knights to ride war horses, creating a nearly unstoppable heavy cavalry for peasant draftees and lightly armoured foot soldiers. With the increased usage of heavy cav- alry, pike infantry became essential to the medieval army.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Techniques of Combat: the Depiction of a Personal Fighting System in the Fight Books of Hans Talhofer (1443-1467 CE)
    Body Techniques of Combat: The Depiction of a Personal Fighting System in the Fight Books of Hans Talhofer (1443-1467 CE) ERIC BURKART If we turQWR³ERGLHVLQEDWWOH´LQWKH0iddle Ages, the question how fighters of the past actually used their bodies in combat is a quite obvious one. Unfortunately, it is difficult to answer. Only very few medieval sources document movements in a way that would allow a detailed reconstruction. Additionally, the interpretation of these sources greatly involves the interpUHWHU¶s own perception of her body and movement, a knowledge that is usually subconscious and difficult to communicate to a (reading) scientific community. From the point of view of cultural history, this hermeneutic framework and the resulting communicational gap is crucial to any scientific approach towards PHGLHYDO³WHFKQLTXHVRIWKHERG\´.1 The most promising historical documents concerning body techniques of combat are the late medieval and early modern fight books.2 In this contribution, I shall focus on a series of five 15th century manuscripts ascribed to the fencing master Hans Talhofer. These treatises will serve as a case study to discuss the communication strategies of medieval fight books and the connection between the 1 MAUSS, 1979; MALLINCKRODT, 2008; SPATZ, 2015. 2 LENG, 2008; BOFFA, 2014. 109 Eric Burkart integrated didactic images and the embodied knowledge of their makers.3 Apart from the hermeneutic set up, there is yet another factor that renders a study on body techniques of combat rather difficult. Interpersonal physical violence is a human practice that is documented throughout the history of mankind. Yet, the violent action itself is volatile and only its material traces can be subject to a historical inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Vnnd Schüß Im Vnder Dem Schwert Den Ort Lang Ein Zů Der Brust”: the Placement and Consequences of Sword-Blows in Sigmund Ringeck’S Fifteenth- Century Fencing Manual
    128 Kellett Chapter 5 “…Vnnd schüß im vnder dem schwert den ort lang ein zů der brust”: The Placement and Consequences of Sword-blows in Sigmund Ringeck’s Fifteenth- Century Fencing Manual Rachel E. Kellett The medieval fencing manual is a valuable if little-studied source of informa- tion on the injuries likely to be caused in medieval combat since it provides instruction on techniques to be used with a wide variety of weapons, including the sword, as well as in unarmed combat. The majority of such texts date to the early fifteenth century and later, and (with one exception) the earliest extant fencing manuals of medieval Europe all come from the German-speaking region.1 Of these German manuals, all but one draw directly or indirectly on the fourteenth-century teachings of Johannes Liechtenauer.2 Although no direct written record of Liechtenauer’s fencing system exists, his influence on the development of medieval German fencing cannot be overstated;3 his 1 See: Jeffrey Forgeng and Alex Kiermayer, “‘The Chivalric Art’: German Martial Arts Treatises of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance,” in The Cutting Edge: Studies in Ancient and Medieval Combat, ed. Barry Molloy (Stroud: Tempus, 2007), 153–67; see in particular 153. The exception is a Middle English manuscript (London, British Museum, Harleian Manuscript 3542, ff. 82– 85), dating to the fifteenth century. 2 No details about Liechtenauer’s life are currently known other than that he was probably active during the fourteenth century. The earliest manuscript containing his teachings, Nuremberg, Germanisches Museum MS 3227a, implies that Liechtenauer was still alive at the time of writing.
    [Show full text]