DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Sur River Watershed Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Big Sur River Watershed Management Plan BIG SUR RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN A Guidance Document For Voluntary Stewardship Efforts To Maintain And Enhance The Quality of Big Sur River Watershed Steelhead Habitat This page intentionally left blank BIG SUR RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN December 2014 Prepared by: Paul Robins [email protected] Stephnie Wald [email protected] Ethan Bell and Zooey Diggory [email protected] [email protected] Doug Smith and Sam Phillips [email protected] Jennifer Nelson and Margaret Paul [email protected] [email protected] In fulfillment of a grant P1140400 from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Fisheries Restoration Grant Program Cover photographs: Stillwater Sciences Resource Conservation District of Monterey County, Central Coast Salmon Enhancement, Stillwater Sciences and California State University of Monterey Bay. 2014. Big Sur River Watershed Management Plan. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, under a grant for the Fisheries Restoration Grant Program (P1140400). Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................5 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................7 1.1 Purpose, Need and Intended Use of the Watershed Plan .........................................................7 1.2 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................................................7 1.3 Overview of the Watershed ...........................................................................................................8 1.4 Watershed History ........................................................................................................................11 1.5 Stakeholder Involvement in the Watershed Plan ......................................................................16 1.5.1 Stakeholder Issues and Concerns ...................................................................................17 1.6 Related Studies and Plans ............................................................................................................17 2 SYNTHESIS OF WATERSHED CONDITIONS .................................................................................21 Physical Features 2.1 Hillslope and Channel Geomorphology ....................................................................................21 2.1.1 Sediment production, transfer, and storage ..................................................................22 2.1.2 Channel morphology .......................................................................................................26 2.2 Geology, Tectonics, and Soils ......................................................................................................32 2.2.1 Roads and Trails ..............................................................................................................36 2.3 Climate ...........................................................................................................................................37 2.3.1 Precipitation .....................................................................................................................39 2.3.2 Climate Change ................................................................................................................41 2.4 Wildfire ..........................................................................................................................................44 Existing Conditions 2.5 Land Use ........................................................................................................................................47 2.5.1 Current land uses and economic activity ......................................................................47 2.5.2 Land use planning ............................................................................................................47 2.5.3 Growth trends in Monterey County ..............................................................................49 2.5.4 Land use controls..............................................................................................................49 2.5.5 Applicable Permit Streamlining Programs ...................................................................49 2.6 Surface and Groundwater Hydrology ........................................................................................50 2.6.1 Surface Hydrology ............................................................................................................50 2.6.2 Flood Mapping (25, 50, 100, 500 year) ..........................................................................54 2.6.3 Lagoon Hydrology and Morphology .............................................................................55 2.6.4 Groundwater .....................................................................................................................57 2.7 Water Quality ................................................................................................................................58 2.7.1 River water qaulity ...........................................................................................................59 2.7.2 Lagoon water qaulity ........................................................................................................65 BIG SUR RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 BIG SUR RIVER WATERSHED PLAN Contents, continued 2.7.3 Bioassessment ................................................................................................................. 66 2.7.3.1 Methods ..........................................................................................................67 2.7.3.2 Benthic macroinvertebrate data ...................................................................69 2.7.3.3 Supporting data ..............................................................................................70 2.8 Instream Infrastructure and Channel Modifications ...............................................................73 2.8.1 Bank revetment and floodplain development ..............................................................73 2.9 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................................74 2.9.1 Vegetation types and distribution ..................................................................................74 2.9.2 Rare plant species and vegetation types ........................................................................77 2.9.3 Non-native invasive plant species ..................................................................................77 2.9.4 Riparian vegetation conditions .......................................................................................83 2.10 Wildlife ...........................................................................................................................................84 2.10.1 California Red-legged Frog .............................................................................................84 2.10.2 Pacific lamprey ..................................................................................................................85 2.10.3 Smith’s blue butterfly .........................................................................................................85 2.10.4 Pacific pond turtle ............................................................................................................85 2.10.5 Tidewater goby .................................................................................................................85 2.10.6 Non-native, invasive wildlife species .............................................................................85 3 STEELHEAD ............................................................................................................................................88 3.1 Population ......................................................................................................................................88 3.1.1 Status and Population Structure .....................................................................................88 3.1.2 Population Estimates........................................................................................................89 3.1.3 Distribution .......................................................................................................................89 3.2 Life history and Habitat Requirements ......................................................................................89 3.3 Limiting Factors ............................................................................................................................91 3.3.1 Fish passage .....................................................................................................................92 3.3.2 Fine Sediment .................................................................................................................96 3.3.3 Spawning Habitat ..........................................................................................................98 3.3.4 Rearing Habitat ..............................................................................................................99 3.3.5 Food Availability and Size at Smolting ........................................................................99
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cultural Resources Study
    CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY CARMEL RIVER BANK STABILIZATION AT RANCHO SAN CARLOS ROAD CARMEL, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Confidential - Not for Public Distribution This report contains confidential cultural resources location information; report distribution should be restricted to those with a need to know. Cultural resources are nonrenewable and their scientific, cultural, and aesthetic values can be significantly impaired by disturbance. To deter vandalism, artifact hunting, and other activities that can damage cultural resources, the locations of cultural resources should be kept confidential. The legal authority to restrict cultural resources information is in Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and California Government Section Code 6254.10 exempts archaeological sites from the California Public Records Act requiring that public records be open to public inspection. June 2018 CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY CARMEL RIVER BANK STABILIZATION AT RANCHO SAN CARLOS ROAD CARMEL, MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Larry Hampson, District Engineer Monterey Peninsula Water District P.O. Box 85 Monterey, California 93942 Prepared by: Lora Holland, M.A., RPA 989173 E. Timothy Jones, M.A., RPA 15531 LSA 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 510.236.6810 LSA Project No. MPW1701 June 2018 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES S TUDY C ARMEL R IVER B ANK S TABILIZATION AT R ANCHO S AN C ARLOS R OAD J UNE 2018 C ARMEL, M ONTEREY C OUNTY, C ALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LSA conducted this cultural resources study for the proposed Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project (project) in Carmel, Monterey County, California. Because the Monterey Peninsula Water District (Water District) is applying for a Nationwide Permit with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring/Summer 2018
    Spring/Summer 2018 Point Lobos Board of Directors Sue Addleman | Docent Administrator Kit Armstrong | President Chris Balog Jacolyn Harmer Ben Heinrich | Vice President Karen Hewitt Loren Hughes Diana Nichols Julie Oswald Ken Ruggerio Jim Rurka Joe Vargo | Secretary John Thibeau | Treasurer Cynthia Vernon California State Parks Liaison Sean James | [email protected] A team of State Parks staff, Point Lobos Docents and community volunteers take a much-needed break after Executive Director restoring coastal bluff habitat along the South Shore. Anna Patterson | [email protected] Development Coordinator President’s message 3 Tracy Gillette Ricci | [email protected] Kit Armstrong Docent Coordinator and School Group Coordinator In their footsteps 4 Melissa Gobell | [email protected] Linda Yamane Finance Specialist Shell of ages 7 Karen Cowdrey | [email protected] Rae Schwaderer ‘iim ‘aa ‘ishxenta, makk rukk 9 Point Lobos Magazine Editor Reg Henry | [email protected] Louis Trevino Native plants and their uses 13 Front Cover Chuck Bancroft Linda Yamane weaves a twined work basket of local native plant materials. This bottomless basket sits on the rim of a From the editor 15 shallow stone mortar, most often attached to the rim with tar. Reg Henry Photo: Neil Bennet. Notes from the docent log 16 Photo Spread, pages 10-11 Compiled by Ruthann Donahue Illustration of Rumsen life by Linda Yamane. Acknowledgements 18 Memorials, tributes and grants Crossword 20 Ann Pendleton Our mission is to protect and nurture Point Lobos State Natural Reserve, to educate and inspire visitors to preserve its unique natural and cultural resources, and to strengthen the network of Carmel Area State Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Grooming Veterinary Pet Guidelines Doggie Dining
    PET GUIDELINES GROOMING VETERINARY We welcome you and your furry companions to Ventana Big Sur! In an effort to ensure the peace and tranquility of all guests, we ask for your PET FOOD EXPRESS MONTEREY PENINSULA assistance with the following: 204 Mid Valley Shopping VETERINARY EMERGENCY & Carmel, CA SPECIALTY CENTER A non-refundable, $150 one-time fee per pet 831-622-9999 20 Lower Ragsdale Drive will be charged to your guestroom/suite. Do-it-yourself pet wash Suite 150 Monterey, CA Pets must be leashed at all times while on property. 831.373.7374 24 hours, weekends and holidays Pets are restricted from the following areas: Pool or pool areas The Sur House dining room Spa Alila Organic garden Owners must be present, or the pet removed from the room, for housekeeping to freshen your guestroom/suite. If necessary, owners will be required to interrupt activities to attend to a barking dog that may be disrupting other guests. Our concierge is happy to help you arrange pet sitting through a local vendor (see back page) if desired. These guidelines are per county health codes; the only exceptions are for certified guide dogs. DOGGIE DINING We want all of our guests to have unforgettable dining experiences at Ventana—so we created gourmet meals for our furry friends, too! Available 7 a.m. to 10 p.m through In Room Dining or at Sur House. Chicken & Rice $12 Organic Chicken Breast / Fresh Garden Vegetables / Basmati Rice Coco Patty $12 Naturally Raised Ground Beef / Potato / Garden Vegetables Salmon Bowl $14 Salmon / Basmati Rice / Sweet Potato
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • The Carmel Pine Cone
    VolumeThe 105 No. 42 Carmelwww.carmelpinecone.com Pine ConeOctober 18-24, 2019 T RUS T ED BY LOCALS AND LOVED BY VISI T ORS SINCE 1 9 1 5 Deal pending for Esselen tribe to buy ranch Cal Am takeover By CHRIS COUNTS But the takeover is not a done deal yet, despite local media reports to the contrary, Peter Colby of the Western study to be IF ALL goes according to plan, it won’t be a Silicon Rivers Conservancy told The Pine Cone this week. His Valley executive or a land conservation group that soon group is brokering the deal between the current owner of takes ownership of a remote 1,200-acre ranch in Big Sur the ranch, the Adler family of Sweden, and the Esselen released Nov. 6 but a Native American tribe with deep local roots. Tribe of Monterey County. “A contract for the sale is in place, By KELLY NIX but a number of steps need to be com- pleted first before the land is trans- THE LONG-AWAITED findings of a study to deter- ferred,” Colby said. mine the feasibility of taking over California American While Colby didn’t say how much Water’s local system and turning it into a government-run the land is selling for, it was listed operation will be released Nov. 6, the Monterey Peninsula at $8 million when The Pine Cone Water Management District announced this week. reported about it in 2017. But ear- The analysis was launched after voters in November lier this month, the California Nat- 2018 OK’d a ballot measure calling for the water district ural Resources Agency announced to use eminent domain, if necessary, to acquire Cal Am’s that something called “the Esselen Monterey Peninsula water system if the move was found Tribal Lands Conservation Project” to be cost effective.
    [Show full text]
  • BSMAAC MCRMA Report 030519
    PROJECT APPLICATIONS IN BIG SUR County of Monterey Resource Management Agency – Planning ACTIVITY BETWEEN OCTOBER 5, 2018 AND FEBRUARY 25, 2019 The following projects are currently active within the Big Sur Coast Land Use Plan area or have been decided since OCTOBER 5, 2018. Changes are highlighted: FILE # APPLICANT AREA PROPOSED USE PLN190049 VITA ROBERT A AND 36918 PALO FOLLOW‐UP COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT OF AN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EMERGENCY (PLANNER: LIZ JENNIE G CO‐TRS COLORADO ROAD, PERMIT (PLN170270) TO ALLOW AN 11‐MILE BIG SUR MARATHON RACE TIED TO THE GONZALES) (GRIMES RANCH CARMEL ANNUAL BIG SUR INTERNATIONAL MARATHON. THIS RACE CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY RACE) 1,600 PARTICIPANTS ON THE GRIMES RANCH WHICH IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 1, CARMEL (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 243‐262‐006‐000), SOUTH OF PALO COLORADO ROAD, BIG SUR COAST LAND USE PLAN, COASTAL ZONE. APPLIED ON FEBRUARY 11, 2019; 30‐DAY REVIEW PERIOD ENDS ON MARCH 13, 2019. STATUS IS “APPLIED”. PLN190043 ROBERTS BRYAN & 37600 HIGHWAY 1, EMERGENCY COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 128 (PLANNER: ADRIENNE D TRS MONTEREY LINEAR FOOT HILFIKER RETAINING WALL TO SECURE HILLSIDE FOR ACCESS; DUE TO RICHARD “CRAIG” HILLSIDE SUPPORTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING FAILING AND LEAKING SEPTIC TANK. SMITH) THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 37600 HIGHWAY 1, BIG SUR (ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 418‐111‐012‐000), BIG SUR COAST LAND USE PLAN, COASTAL ZONE. APPLIED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2019. PLANNER WORKING WITH APPLICANT & COASTAL COMMISSION STAFF ON MINIMUM NECESSARY TO STABILIZE. STATUS IS “APPLIED”. PLN190032 GORDA OCEAN FRONT 72801 HIGHWAY 1, EMERGENCY COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR THE REPAIR OF AN AREA SUBJECT TO (PLANNER: PROPERTIES INC BIG SUR SUPERFICIAL SLIDING AND EROSION DUE TO WEAK SOILS SATURATED BY RAINFALL AND RICHARD “CRAIG” SUBSURFACE SEEPAGE.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur for Other Uses, See Big Sur (Disambiguation)
    www.caseylucius.com [email protected] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Big Sur For other uses, see Big Sur (disambiguation). Big Sur is a lightly populated region of the Central Coast of California where the Santa Lucia Mountains rise abruptly from the Pacific Ocean. Although it has no specific boundaries, many definitions of the area include the 90 miles (140 km) of coastline from the Carmel River in Monterey County south to the San Carpoforo Creek in San Luis Obispo County,[1][2] and extend about 20 miles (30 km) inland to the eastern foothills of the Santa Lucias. Other sources limit the eastern border to the coastal flanks of these mountains, only 3 to 12 miles (5 to 19 km) inland. Another practical definition of the region is the segment of California State Route 1 from Carmel south to San Simeon. The northern end of Big Sur is about 120 miles (190 km) south of San Francisco, and the southern end is approximately 245 miles (394 km) northwest of Los Angeles. The name "Big Sur" is derived from the original Spanish-language "el sur grande", meaning "the big south", or from "el país grande del sur", "the big country of the south". This name refers to its location south of the city of Monterey.[3] The terrain offers stunning views, making Big Sur a popular tourist destination. Big Sur's Cone Peak is the highest coastal mountain in the contiguous 48 states, ascending nearly a mile (5,155 feet/1571 m) above sea level, only 3 miles (5 km) from the ocean.[4] The name Big Sur can also specifically refer to any of the small settlements in the region, including Posts, Lucia and Gorda; mail sent to most areas within the region must be addressed "Big Sur".[5] It also holds thousands of marathons each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area
    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
    [Show full text]
  • Garrapata State Park Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft
    COASTAL HABITAT RESTORATION AND COASTAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Garrapata State Park Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Draft State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Monterey District June 13, 2012 This page intentionally blank. COASTAL HABITAT RESTORATION AND COASTAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS/MND – DRAFT JUNE 2012 GARRAPATA STATE PARK CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................ 1 CHAPTER II ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST...................................................... 13 I. AESTHETICS. ................................................................................ 17 II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES ...……………… 21 III. AIR QUALITY.................................................................................. 23 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .......................................................... 26 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................. 48 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................. 64 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ................................................. 69 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ................................. 70 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .......................................... 73 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING .......................................................... 78 XI. MINERAL
    [Show full text]
  • UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer
    UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer Photographs - Job Number Index Description Job Number Date Thompson Lawn 1350 1946 August Peter Thatcher 1467 undated Villa Moderne, Taylor and Vial - Carmel 1645-1951 1948 Telephone Building 1843 1949 Abrego House 1866 undated Abrasive Tools - Bob Gilmore 2014, 2015 1950 Inn at Del Monte, J.C. Warnecke. Mark Thomas 2579 1955 Adachi Florists 2834 1957 Becks - interiors 2874 1961 Nicholas Ten Broek 2878 1961 Portraits 1573 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1517 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1573 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1581 circa 1945-1960 Portraits 1873 circa 1945-1960 Portraits unnumbered circa 1945-1960 [Naval Radio Training School, Monterey] unnumbered circa 1945-1950 [Men in Hardhats - Sign reads, "Hitler Asked for It! Free Labor is Building the Reply"] unnumbered circa 1945-1950 CZ [Crown Zellerbach] Building - Sonoma 81510 1959 May C.Z. - SOM 81552 1959 September C.Z. - SOM 81561 1959 September Crown Zellerbach Bldg. 81680 1960 California and Chicago: landscapes and urban scenes unnumbered circa 1945-1960 Spain 85343 1957-1958 Fleurville, France 85344 1957 Berardi fountain & water clock, Rome 85347 1980 Conciliazione fountain, Rome 84154 1980 Ferraioli fountain, Rome 84158 1980 La Galea fountain, in Vatican, Rome 84160 1980 Leone de Vaticano fountain (RR station), Rome 84163 1980 Mascherone in Vaticano fountain, Rome 84167 1980 Pantheon fountain, Rome 84179 1980 1 UCSC Special Collections and Archives MS 6 Morley Baer Photographs - Job Number Index Quatre Fountain, Rome 84186 1980 Torlonai
    [Show full text]
  • Carmel Pine Cone, September 24, 2007
    Folksinging Principal honored May I offer you legend plays for athletics, a damp shoe? Sunset Center academics — INSIDE THIS WEEK BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE PAID CARMEL, CA Permit No. 149 Volume 93 No. 38 On the Internet: www.carmelpinecone.com September 21-27, 2007 Y OUR S OURCE F OR L OCAL N EWS, ARTS AND O PINION S INCE 1915 Pot bust, gunfire Ready for GPU may thwart at Garland Park her closeup ... Rancho Cañada By MARY BROWNFIELD housing project FIVE MEN suspected of a cultivating marijuana near Garland Park were arrested at gunpoint late By KELLY NIX Monday morning in the park’s parking lot following a night of strange occurrences that included gunfire, a THE AFFORDABLE housing “overlay” at the mouth of chase and hikers trying to flag down motorists at mid- Carmel Valley outlined in the newly revised county general night on Carmel Valley Road, according to Monterey plan could jeopardize the area’s most promising affordable County Sheriff’s Deputy Tim Krebs. housing development, its backers contend. The saga began Sunday afternoon, when a pair of The Rancho Cañada Village project, a vision of the late hikers saw two men with duffle bags and weapons walk Nick Lombardo, would provide 281 homes at the mouth of out of a nearby canyon. Afraid, one of the hikers yelled, Carmel Valley, constructed on land which is part of the “Police!” prompting the men to drop the bags and run, Rancho Cañada golf course. according to Krebs. According to the plan, half the homes would be sold at The duffles were full of freshly cut marijuana, market prices, subsidizing the which the hikers decided to take, according to the sher- other half, which would be iff’s department.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Accomplishments in the Big Sur Coast Area
    CCC Hearing Item: Th 13.3 February 9, 2012 _______________________________________________________________ California Coastal Commission’s 40th Anniversary Report Coastal Management in Big Sur History and Accomplishments Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR SOUTHERN BIG SUR Gorda “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, southbound, north of Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Cape San Martin, Big Sur Coast. CCRP#1649 9/2/2002 “A Highway Runs Through It” Heading south on Highway One. “A Highway Runs Through It” Southbound Highway One, near Partington Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, south of Mill Creek. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Historic Big Creek Bridge, at entrance to U.C. Big Creek Reserve. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, looking south to the coastal terrace at Pacific Valley. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Monterey County line, looking south into San Luis Obispo County, with Ragged Point and Piedras Blancas in far distance (on the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 NORTHERN BIG SUR “Grand Entrance View” (from the north) of the Big Sur Coast, looking southwards to Soberanes Point, with Point Sur in the distance (on the horizon to the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Garrapata State Park/Beach, looking north to Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Mouth of Garrapata Creek (from Highway One). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Sign for Rocky Point Restaurant, with Notley’s Landing and Rocky Creek Bridge in distance.
    [Show full text]