DOCSLIB.ORG

JP 3-15, Barriers, Obstacles, and Mine Warfare for Joint Operations, 17 June 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JP 3-15, Barriers, Obstacles, and Mine Warfare for Joint Operations, 17 June 2011 Joint Publication 3-15 OF NT TH E E M I S W E' H L L T D E T F E A R N D R A M P Y E D • • U A N C I I T R E E D M S A T F AT E S O Barriers, Obstacles, and Mine Warfare for Joint Operations 06 September 2016 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides guidance to plan and execute barrier, obstacle, and mine warfare for joint operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the CJCS, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance. Commanders of forces operating as part of a multinational (alliance or coalition) military command should follow multinational doctrine and procedures ratified by the United States. For doctrine and procedures not ratified by the US, commanders should evaluate and follow the multinational command’s doctrine and procedures, where applicable and consistent with US law, regulations, and doctrine. For the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: KEVIN D. SCOTT Vice Admiral, USN Director, Joint Force Development i Preface Intentionally Blank ii JP 3-15 SUMMARY OF CHANGES REVISION OF JOINT PUBLICATION 3-15 DATED 17 JUNE 2011 • Provides clarity on US landmine policy, to include employment and training of anti-personnel landmines on and off the Korean Peninsula. • Redefines the term “render safe” to align and comply with US policy and treaty requirements. • Provides clarity and differentiation between joint intelligence preparation of the operational environment and intelligence preparation of the battlespace. • Provides legal accuracy and clarity to discussion on “military gain” and “legality of incidental destruction of civilian property” with regard to the law of war. • Provides clarity of the term “military deception” to align with Joint Publication 3-13.4, Military Deception, and deletes discussion on the two basic approaches to deception. • Modifies the definition and description of obstacle intelligence to provide clarity and align with existing doctrine. • Updates chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear reconnaissance and surveillance capability. • Provides clarity of civil affair activities and considerations in support of civil- military operations to align with doctrine. • Provides legal accuracy and clarity of authority for humanitarian mine action. iii Summary of Changes Intentionally Blank iv JP 3-15 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Introduction ................................................................................................................. I-1 Operational Framework .............................................................................................. I-1 The Threat ................................................................................................................... I-6 Legal Considerations .................................................................................................. I-7 CHAPTER II JOINT PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Authorities and Responsibilities ................................................................................II-1 General Considerations ..............................................................................................II-2 Planning Sequence .....................................................................................................II-8 Planning Support ......................................................................................................II-11 CHAPTER III LAND OPERATIONS General Discussion .................................................................................................. III-1 Mobility Considerations ........................................................................................... III-2 Countermobility Considerations .............................................................................. III-6 Command and Control ........................................................................................... III-15 CHAPTER IV MARITIME OPERATIONS General Discussion .................................................................................................. IV-1 Naval Mine Warfare Command and Control ........................................................... IV-2 Environmental Considerations ................................................................................. IV-2 Elements of Naval Mine Warfare ............................................................................ IV-2 Mining ...................................................................................................................... IV-2 Mine Countermeasures ............................................................................................ IV-5 Service Considerations ........................................................................................... IV-12 Navy Salvage Support............................................................................................ IV-14 APPENDIX A Land Forces Reports .................................................................................. A-1 B Service Specific Considerations .................................................................B-1 C Humanitarian Mine Action .........................................................................C-1 D References ................................................................................................. D-1 E Administrative Instructions ........................................................................ E-1 v Table of Contents GLOSSARY Part I Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms .............................................. GL-1 Part II Terms and Definitions ............................................................................. GL-4 FIGURE I-1 Types of Obstacles ...................................................................................... I-5 I-2 The Hague Convention (VIII) Provisions ................................................... I-9 II-1 Barrier, Obstacle, and Minefield Objectives ..............................................II-5 II-2 Joint Planning Process ................................................................................II-8 II-3 Intelligence Support Tasks .......................................................................II-12 III-1 Breaching Considerations ........................................................................ III-4 III-2 Example of Networked Munitions ......................................................... III-10 IV-1 Environmental Considerations in Naval Mine Warfare ........................... IV-3 IV-2 Elements of Naval Mine Warfare ............................................................. IV-4 IV-3 Maritime Mine Countermeasures ............................................................. IV-5 IV-4 Maritime Mine Countermeasure Mission Objectives .............................. IV-8 vi JP 3-15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMMANDER’S OVERVIEW • Provides a framework to employ and counter obstacles • Outlines the role of obstacles in joint operations • Discusses US law and policy concerning landmines and humanitarian demining • Discusses the framework to plan and conduct land operations to minimize the impact from barriers, obstacles, and landmines, and to synchronize their employment • Outlines the strategic, operational, and tactical employment of sea mines and mine countermeasures Introduction Operational Framework In major operations and campaigns, and some crisis response and limited contingency operations, joint forces use obstacles offensively and defensively to attack the mobility of adversaries, enhance the effectiveness of friendly fires, deny adversaries the use of terrain, disrupt sustainment operations, and inflict damage to enemy forces. Joint forces must assure their mobility, conserve their fighting potential, and protect their ability to provide personnel, logistics, and other support. They predict and prevent enemy use of obstacles, detect their existence, avoid them, neutralize
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waging War Land Mines
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE April 2002 StateStateMagazine Waging War on Land Mines StateState Magazine April 2002 Contents No. 456 Department of State • United States of America 7 Post of the Month: Tunis 11 COLUMNS Diplomats have come here for two centuries. 2 From the Secretary 11 Office of the Month: Civil Rights Diversity improves the process and product. 6 Direct from the D.G. 14 Land Mines DEPARTMENTS They are Afghanistan’s hidden killers. 3 Letters to the Editor 18 Delegation Visits Air War College 4 In the News Education and training are at forefront. 26 Education & Training 20 Language Immersion Hue hosts intrepid students from Hanoi. 28 Medical Report 23 Supporting ‘Enduring Freedom’ 30 Appointments Political-Military Bureau is behind the scenes. 31 Personnel Actions 25 FSI Launches New Publications 32 Obituaries Training continuums underscore commitment. Photo by Dave Krecke Dave Photo by OCR’s Terrence Edwards and Gracie Minnis in a mock ADR Session. The columns of Capitolano at 7 Dougga, in Tunisia. On the Cover An Afghan searches for land mines near Kabul. Photo by Brennan Linsley/AP Photos Photo by Steve Vidler/PictureQuest Steve Photo by FROM THE SECRETARY SECRETARY COLIN L. POWELL Making Our Case on Capitol Hill t’s that time again, the beginning of the annual We are also asking Congress to keep funding our pro- Icongressional appropriations process. grams to upgrade and enhance our worldwide security Last year, we made a strong case to Congress for the readiness, including money to hire security agents and additional resources we need to strengthen our ability conduct counterterrorism programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmines and Spatial Development∗
    Landmines and Spatial Development∗ Giorgio Chiovelliy Stelios Michalopoulosz London Business School Brown University, CEPR and NBER Elias Papaioannoux London Business School, CEPR June 20, 2018 ∗We thank UK's Department of Foreign International Development (DFID) and the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) for generous funding via the PEDL programme. We are grateful to London Business School Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship for supporting this research, as well as the UKs EPSRC. A special thanks to Sebastian Hohmann for help in various phases and aspects of this project. We would like to thank Suzana Moreira and the MoWoza team for helping us collect and organize some of the data. We would like to thank all demining operators involved in the Mine Action program in Mozambique and, in particular, APOPO, HALO Trust, Handicap International (Humanity and Inclusion), and Norwegian's People Aid for kindly sharing the original data on their interventions and generously sharing their expert knowledge and on-the-ground experience. This project could not have been completed without the generous support of many dedicated individuals. We are thankful to Olivier Cottray, Anne-Li Naucler, and Wendi Pedersen from the Geneva International Center for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) for assisting us in various stages of this project. We are truly grateful to Alberto Maverengue Augusto from Mozambiques National Institute of Demining; Mica Bevington, Jean-Baptiste Richard, and Gilles Delecourt, Alma Al Osta, and Emanuel Sauvage from Humanity and Inclusion; Camille Wallen and Rachel Boddy from HALO Trust; Afedra Robert Iga and Hans Peter Risser from NPA; Ashley S. Fitzpatrick and Tess Tewelde from APOPO; Chris Pearce and Richard Holmes from Dynasafe; Manuel Sitoe from UNADP.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Navy Activity Descriptions
    Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 APPENDIX A Navy Activity Descriptions Appendix A Navy Activity Descriptions Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A Navy Activity Descriptions Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing TABLE OF CONTENTS A. NAVY ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................ A-1 A.1 Description of Sonar, Munitions, Targets, and Other Systems Employed in Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Events .................................................................. A-1 A.1.1 Sonar Systems and Other Acoustic Sources ......................................................... A-1 A.1.2 Munitions .............................................................................................................. A-7 A.1.3 Targets ................................................................................................................ A-11 A.1.4 Defensive Countermeasures ............................................................................... A-13 A.1.5 Mine Warfare Systems ........................................................................................ A-13 A.1.6 Military Expended Materials ............................................................................... A-16 A.2 Training Activities ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Bombs and Landmines in Kosovo
    LANDMINES IN kosovo EXPLOSIVEREMNANTS OF WAR CLUSTER BOMBS AND Mines-Arms Unit International Committee of the Red Cross 19, Avenue de la Paix, CH-1202 Geneva Switzerland T +41 22 730 26 67 F +41 22 730 28 30 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.icrc.org Front cover photo: G. Diffidenti Design: The Magic Pencil Original: English August 2000 MINES-ARMSRevised June 2001 UNIT Produced with environment-friendly materials CONTENTSCONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Glossary of acronyms 3 1. Introduction 4 2. The impact of cluster bombs in Kosovo 6 The role of cluster bombs in the conflict Post-conflict casualties The socio-economic impact of cluster bombs Clearance of cluster bomblets: a unique challenge 3. The impact of landmines and UXO in Kosovo 15 The use of landmines The impact of landmines and UXO on civilians The socio-economic impact of landmines and UXO The impact of landmines on peace-keeping 4. Mine action and unexploded ordnance clearance in Kosovo 23 Definition and coordination Information management Mine and UXO survey and marking Mine clearance Clearance of cluster bomblets and other unexploded munitions IMPACTMine and UXO awareness education Mine and UXO victim assistance 5. Cluster bombs and landmines under international law 34 Cluster bombs Landmines 6. Conclusions and recommendations 36 Cluster bombs Landmines Annexe Military technical agreement Bibliography 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis report was written by Stuart Maslen, a consultant and former advisor to the ICRC’s Mines-Arms Unit, based on field visits to Kosovo in the winter and spring of 2000 and on information provided by the ICRC delegation in Kosovo.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Anti-Personnel Mines the Next Generations Landmine Action Consists of the Following Co-Operating Organisations
    Alternative anti-personnel mines The next generations Landmine Action consists of the following co-operating organisations: ActionAid International Alert Refugee Council Action for Southern Africa Jaipur Limb Campaign Royal College of Paediatrics & Action on Disability and Development Jesuit Refugee Service Child Health Adopt-A-Minefield UK MEDACT Saferworld Afghanaid Medical & Scientific Aid for Vietnam Laos & Save the Children UK Amnesty International UK Cambodia Soroptimist International UK Programme Action Committee CAFOD Medical Educational Trust Tearfund Cambodia Trust Merlin United Nations Association Campaign Against Arms Trade Mines Advisory Group United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) UK Child Advocacy International Motivation VERTIC Christian Aid Mozambique Angola Committee War Child Comic Relief Omega Foundation War on Want Concern Worldwide One World Action Welsh Centre for International Affairs Disability Awareness in Action Oxfam GB Women’s International League for Peace & Environmental Investigation Agency Pax Christi Freedom Global Witness Peace Pledge Union World Vision UK Handicap International (UK) People and Planet Hope for Children POWER Human Rights Watch Quaker Peace & Service The member organisations of the German Initiative to Ban Landmines are: Bread for the World Social Service Agency of the Evangelical Church Misereor Christoffel Mission for the Blind in Germany Oxfam Germany German Justitia et Pax Commission Eirene International Pax Christi German Committee for Freedom from Hunger Handicap International Germany
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan: Is It Time for the United States to Sign the Ottawa Treaty and End the Use of Landmines?
    RIZER FORMATTED POST PROOF EDIT.DOC 2/1/2013 1:19 PM LESSONS FROM IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN: IS IT TIME FOR THE UNITED STATES TO SIGN THE OTTAWA TREATY AND END THE USE OF LANDMINES? ARTHUR RIZER* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 36 II. HISTORY ......................................................................................... 37 A. History of Landmines Warfare ........................................... 37 1. The First Silent Killers .................................................. 37 2. The Revolution of Landmines ...................................... 40 3. With Sticks and Duct Tape: IEDs ................................. 42 B. History of the Law .............................................................. 43 1. Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons ............ 43 2. Ottawa Treaty ............................................................... 46 3. The United States’ Role in Landmine Law .................. 49 C. Reconciling the Law and the Weapons ............................... 53 III. A NEW DIRECTION: SECURITY PRAGMATISM ................................ 54 A. Morality is Not Relative ..................................................... 55 B. Military Effectiveness ......................................................... 63 C. Power in Numbers ............................................................... 66 IV. THE OTHER SIDE: COUNTERARGUMENTS ...................................... 68 * Arthur Rizer is a prosecutor with the United States
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Sea Mines in the Indo-Pacific
    Issue 18, 2020 BREACHING THE SURFACE: THE FUTURE OF SEA MINES IN THE INDO-PACIFIC Alia Huberman, The Australian National Internships Program Issue 18, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report argues that several dynamics of the coming few decades in the Indo-Pacific will see naval mines used once again in the region. It suggests they will form the basis of anti-access strategies for some Indo-Pacific states in a way that will be deeply transformative for the region’s strategic balance and for which Australia is thoroughly unprepared. It seeks to draw attention to the often- underappreciated nature of sea mines as a uniquely powerful strategic tool, offering the user an unparalleled asymmetric ability to engage high-value enemy targets while posing a minimal-risk, low- expense, and continuous threat. In the increasingly contested strategic environment of the contemporary Indo-Pacific - a region in which the threats to free navigation and the maritime economy are existential ones - there is considerable appetite for anti-access and sea denial weapons as defensive, offensive, and coercive tools. Naval strategists must,, prepare for the resurgence of mine warfare in the Indo-Pacific, and for the grand-scale and rapid timeline in which it can transform an operational environment. This report first seeks to collate and outline those characteristics of sea mines and of their interaction with an operational environment that make them attractive for use. It then discusses the states most likely to employ mine warfare and the different scenarios in which they might do so, presenting five individual contingencies: China, Taiwan, North Korea, non-state actors, and Southeast Asian states.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Mine Warfare Champion
    Naval War College Review Volume 68 Article 8 Number 2 Spring 2015 Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion Scott .C Truver Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Truver, Scott .C (2015) "Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion," Naval War College Review: Vol. 68 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol68/iss2/8 This Additional Writing is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Truver: Wanted: U.S. Navy Mine Warfare Champion COMMENTARY WANTED U.S. NAVY MINE WARFARE CHAMPION Scott C. Truver Successfully implementing innovation within a bureaucracy ultimately requires a champion to navigate the inherently political processes of securing sponsorship and resourcing. This is just as important to the very small as to the very large programs, particularly during periods of fiscal austerity. “It’s fragmented,” com- mented retired rear admiral Paul Ryan, former commander of the U.S. Navy’s Mine Warfare Command, in April 2014. “There is no single champion for mine warfare.”1 This lack of support presents challenges for the U.S. Navy and the nation, as the service struggles to articulate, and to muster the necessary backing for, mine warfare (MIW) strategies, programs, capabilities, and capacities. The task of confronting these challenges is complicated by the fact that MIW comprises not only mine-countermeasures (MCM—that is, minesweeping and mine hunt- ing) systems and platforms but also mines that can be employed to defeat our adversaries’ naval strategies and forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Revitalizing Mine Countermeasure: Lessons from the Royal Navy In
    NAVAL MINE WARFARE ESSAY CONTEST—1ST PRIZE Sponsored by The Mine Warfare Association BY LIEUTENANT JOHN MILLER, REVITALIZE MINE U.S. NAVY COUNTERMEASURES The Royal Navy’s experience responding to mines in World War II offers lessons for today. RAYTHEON 48 PROCEEDINGS | AUGUST 2019 he U.S. Navy knows that its current adversaries pose a substantial offensive mining threat. Russia, China, and Iran each possess—and too often export—an advanced, ro- bust, and mature offensive mine capability. The U.S. Navy must consider if it has the T speed and resources with which to respond to restore freedom of maneuver in the event of sustained mining. The pre–World War II U.S. Navy had neither built a minesweeper nor swept a mine in its his- tory. It had zero minesweepers on the register of active ships in September 1939.1 In compar- ison, the Royal Navy had 76 fleet minesweepers.2 By the end of the war, more than 1,000 U.S. and Allied vessels had served as minesweepers, combating offensive mine operations from the Atlantic and the Mediterranean to the Far East. While some were purpose-built, many were commercial vessels, such as trawlers and drifters, pressed into service by the Royal Navy to support mine countermeasure (MCM), antisubmarine warfare (ASW), escort, and patrol mis- sions. Though lightly armed, these vessels played a vital role in combating and defeating ad- versaries across multiple warfare domains. By filling a critical capability gap, these ships and boats enabled the Royal Navy to effectively stretch its finite naval forces across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Mines and Naval Mine Countermeasures: Are Autonomous Underwater Vehicles the Answer, and Is the Royal Canadian Navy Ready for the New Paradigm?
    SEA MINES AND NAVAL MINE COUNTERMEASURES: ARE AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES THE ANSWER, AND IS THE ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY READY FOR THE NEW PARADIGM? Lieutenant-Commander J. Greenlaw JCSP 39 PCEMI 39 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2013 ministre de la Défense nationale, 2013. CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 39 – PCEMI 39 2012 – 2013 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES - MAITRISE EN ÉTUDES DE LA DÉFENSE SEA MINES AND NAVAL MINE COUNTERMEASURES: ARE AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLES THE ANSWER, AND IS THE ROYAL CANADIAN NAVY READY FOR THE NEW PARADIGM? By Lieutenant-Commander J. Greenlaw, RCN Par capitaine de corvette J. Greenlaw, MRC This paper was written by a student La présente étude a été rédigée par attending the Canadian Forces un stagiaire du Collège des Forces College in fulfilment of one of the canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une requirements of the Course of des exigences du cours. L'étude est Studies. The paper is a scholastic un document qui se rapporte au document, and thus contains facts cours et contient donc des faits et des and opinions, which the author opinions que seul l'auteur considère alone considered appropriate and appropriés et convenables au sujet.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No
    Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Chesterfield County, Virginia Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor, Inc. North Shore Commons A 4951 McCormickLake Brook Drive, Taylor Suite 275 NorthGlen ShoreAllen, VirginiaCommons 23060 A 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 275 Glen Allen, VA 23060 May 2013 804-762-5800 May 2013 Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Phase I ArchaeologicalChesterfield County,Identification Virginia Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor NorthMcCormick Shore Commons Taylor, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1812; the War, and Its Moral : a Canadian Chronicle
    '^^ **7tv»* ^^ / ^^^^T^\/ %*^-'%p^ ^<>.*^7^\/ ^o^*- "o /Vi^/\ co^i^^.% Atii^/^-^^ /.' .*'% y A-^ ; .O*^ . <f,r*^.o^" X'^'^^V %--f.T*\o^^ V^^^^\<^ •^ 4.^ tri * -0 a5 «4q il1 »"^^ 11E ^ ^ THE WAR, AND ITS MORAL CANADIAN CHRONICLE. BY WILLIAM F?"C0FFIN, Esquire, FORMERLT SHERIFF OF THE DISTRICT OF MONTREAI,, LIEUT.-COLONKL, STAFF, ACIITB POROB, CANADA, AND H. M. AGENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ORDNANCE ESTATES, CANADA. PRINTED BY JOHN LOVELL, ST. NICHOLAS STREET. 1864. E354 C^y 2. Entered, according to the Act of the Provincial Parliament, in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, by William F. Coffin, in the OfBce of the Registrar of the Province of Canada. Ea t\}t J^igfjt pjonourable ^ir (SbmtmtJ SSalhtr f cab, iarond, ^er Pajtstg's Post '§ononmbk ^ribg Council, ^nU late ffiobernor ©cneral anli C0mmanKcr4tt=(H;fjicf of IBxitislj Nortfj America, ©Ws (jrattatlinw (!>Uv0uicU 0f the ^m of I8I2 is rcspcctftillp tirtitcatEU, fig fjis fattfjful anU grateful .Scrfaant, WILLIAM P. COFFIN. Ottawa, 2nd January, 1864, TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE SIR EDMUND WALKER HEAD, BARONET. My dear Sir,—^I venture to appeal to your respected name as the best introduction for the little work which I" do myself the honour to dedicate to you. To you, indeed, it owes its existence. You conferred upon me the appointment I have the honour to hold under the Crown in Canada, and that appointment has given life to an idea, long cherished in embryo. The management of the Ordnance Lands in this Province has thrown me upon the scenes of the most notable events of the late war.
    [Show full text]