DOCSLIB.ORG

Agonistic Interactions in Siskin Flocks: Why Are Dominants Sometimes Subordinate ?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agonistic Interactions in Siskin Flocks: Why Are Dominants Sometimes Subordinate ? Behavioral Ecology Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1989) 25:141-145 and Sociobiology Springer-Verlag 1989 Agonistic interactions in siskin flocks: Why are dominants sometimes subordinate ? J.C. Senar 1, M. Camerino 1, and N.B. Metealfe 2 1 Museu de Zoologia, Ap. 593, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 2 Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK Received July 15, 1988 / Accepted April 18, 1989 Summary. Dominance interactions among captive that individual (Wilson 1975). Early descriptions siskins were examined to see if the behavior of of dominance relationships stressed consistency dominants reduced the risk of subordinates leaving and predictability of encounters between group the flock. The outcome of aggressive encounters companions and related it to fighting ability (see was related to the possession status of the two Schein 1975). However, there is increasing evidence birds (i.e., which bird was first to arrive at the that many other factors can be important in deter- contested resource) and the type of aggression used mining the outcome of a fight; the outcome cannot (i.e., display or attack). More dominant birds were always be predicted accurately on the basis of the successful whether they were possessors or in- relative status of the opponents (Huntingford and truders, and whether they attacked or displayed. Turner 1987). When possessors, they tended to display, presum- Social species that live in groups with stable ably because of the greater cost of attack and the membership are highly relevant to this topic since lack of substantial benefits associated with it. they are potentially faced with the greatest conflict When intruding, they tended to attack, possibly between aggression and gregariousness (Balph because attack is slightly more successful than dis- 1977). Living in permanent groups increases the play. When initiating encounters against domi- risk of localized competition for resources and, nants, subordinates were more successful if they hence, increases agonistic encounters. However, were possessors than if they were intruders. Subor- despotism that leads to the driving off of subordi- dinates tended to use displays whether they were nates may not be advantageous to dominants (Ek- possessors or intruders, even though when the man 1987) since it can lead to group disruption, birds were intruding, displays were less successful the loss of the benefits of grouping, and as Hogstad than attacks. Subordinates may use display when (1987) has pointed out, to the breakdown of the intruding because attack holds a higher risk of re- entire social system. Therefore, the possibility ar- taliation. The fact that siskins can repel more dom- ises for the evolution of mechanisms that reduce inant intruders merely by using displays suggests despotism and increase tolerance in dominants (see that dominants, by respecting possession and al- Rohwer and Ewald 1981; Hogstad 1987; Ekman lowing reversals, are able to reduce the likelihood 1987). that subordinates will leave the flock. This may Cardueline finches are very good subjects for be to the dominants' long-term advantage, since the study of these topics. They flock all year ar- they gain benefits from being in stable flocks. ound and show a high level of integration among the members of their stable groups (Glfick 1980; Senar 1984; Senar and Metcalfe 1988). Dominance relationships in these birds have been widely de- Introduction scribed, and these relationships show frequent "re- versals" in which dominants are defeated by lower- An animal that consistently wins agonistic en- ranking birds (i.e., Tordoff 1954; Coutlee 1967; counters with another is said to be dominant over Thompson 1960; Senar 1987). The presence of such reversals suggests that there may be contexts Offprint requests to: J.C. Senar in which dominant finches allow subordinates to 142 win encounters, possibly to reduce the risk of sub- truder, c) type of aggressive behavior used during the agonistic ordinates leaving the flock. The aim of this paper interaction (i.e., Display or Attack; see Senar 1982), and d) is to examine the factors that determine the likeli- winner of the encounter. A bird was considered to be dominant over another if it hood of subordinate siskins' (Carduelis spinus) won significantly more than 50% of the encounters between winning encounters with dominants. We focus on them (Senar 1985a), as indicated by the binomial test (Siegel the relationship between social rank of the oppo- 1956). Since social hierarchies in siskins are nor linear (Senar nents and outcome of aggressive encounters, tak- 1985a), we use the terms "dominant" and "subordinate" to refer only to a bird's relationship with the other bird in the ing into account the form of aggression (whether encounter (the" relative value of dominance," Huntingford and threat or attack) and the possession asymmetry Turner 1987). Dominance relationships were statistically signifi- of contestants (whether possessors or intruders). cant between all but two pairs of birds; agonistic interactions within these pairs were excluded from the analyses. The two groups had three birds in common; therefore, the duplicated Material and methods dyads were combined to produce one data set per pair of birds. This produced a total of 15 separate dominant-subordinate The study was carried out with two captive groups of siskins. dyads, which formed the basis of the analyses. Each group consisted of five adult birds, color-ringed for indi- The influence of possession, type of aggression used, and vidual identification. Each group was housed in an outdoor dominance status on the success rate of agonistic encounters cage (100 x 50 x 60 cm) with three perches, two food containers, were analyzed using a trifactorial ANOVA. Success rates were and one water source, and was observed through a one way calculated as arcsine transformations of the percentage of ini- glass panel. Only one bird at a time was able to feed or drink. tiated encounters won by each individual in each dyad; these The feeders were replenished once a day, and observations were calculated only when there were more than 10 interactions on interactions were made immediately afterwards. The experi- in each situation. ment was conducted during June and July 1986 for one group The relative use of displays and attacks was assessed in and during October and November 1986 for the other; the a similar way, by calculating the (arcsine transformed) percent- mean duration of each daily recording session was half an hour. age of interactions that were displays for each bird in each A total of 46 (19+27) h of observations were made. In all dyad, when both possessor and intruder. interactions, the first bird to display or attack was considered the Actor, and the bird receiving the display the Reactor (Senar 1985a). The first bird to arrive at a resource (food container, Results perch, or water) was considered the Possessor, and birds that came later and challenged the Possessor were called Intruders. Dominants won 88% (SD=9.27, n= 15 dyads) of An individual was considered to have won an encounter if its their agonistic encounters and subordinates 12% opponent demonstrated a submissive posture or withdrew = 9.20, n = 15). Dominants initiating the inter- (Senar 1982, 1985a). Winners of encounters gained or retained (SD access to the feeder, water, or perch. Since all birds were highly action (Actors) won on 98% of the occasions, and familiar with the resources and would be equally hungry, we subordinate actors on 61% (Table 1); this differ- assumed that there would be no payoff assymmetries (Maynard ence was highly significant (t=8.74, dr=24, P< Smith and Parquer 1976) for the contestants. 0.001). A total of 3149 agonistic interactions were studied, and for each one the following data were recorded: a) idemity of While siskins won the majority of interactions that the Actor and Reactor, b) identity of the Possessor and In- they initiated, they were more likely to win if they Table 1. Trifactorial table showing the success rate of dominant or subordinant siskins when initiating encounters, according to their Possession status and the Type of Aggression used. The percentage of acts that were displays (as opposed to attacks) is shown in the right hand column, in relation to dominance and possession status. The standard deviation and sample size (no. of dyads) is given in parentheses. Significance levels of student's t-tests; * P < 0.05; * * P < 0.01 ;* * * P < 0.001 ; ns: not significant Dominance Possession % % won according to Type of Aggression % Status Status won Displays Attack Display Dominant Possessor 99% 100% ns 99% 90% 98% (1,4 15) (1,9) (1,5 15) (8,6 15) (1,7 15) Intruder 96% 99% ** 95% 31% (4,9 15) (2,5 15) (2,1 11) (15,8 15) Subordinate Possessor 89% 87% ns 91% 95% 61% (0,2 9) (23,1 3) (11,0 6) (7,2 6) (11,7 15) Intruder 51% 75% ** 33 ~ 59% (16,2 9) (12,5 5) (16,9 6) (16,3 9) 143 Table 2. Three-way ANOVA of the effect of dominance, posses- Discussion sion status, and type of aggression used on success rate (arcsine- transformed percentage of encounters won) in agonistic en- Success rate oJ" dominants and subordinates." Does counter it vary with possession ? Source of variation F df P Dominants can displace another individual with- Dominance 92.39 1,62 < 0.001 out difficulty due to their bigger Resource Holding Possession 42.13 1,62 < 0.001 Power (RHP; Parker 1974). Although their success Type Aggression 17.02 1,62 <0.001 rate is significantly higher when possessors than Dom. x Possession 20.00 1,62 <0.001 Dora. x Type Aggression 1.72 1,62 0.195 when intruders, they are very successful in either Possession x Type Agg. 7.53 1,62 0.008 situation (99% success vs 96%, respectively).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 a SHORT BIBLIOGRAPHY in ZOOSEMIOTICS Abram, David
    A SHORT BIBLIOGRAPHY IN ZOOSEMIOTICS Abram, David 1997. The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Random House. Abram, David 2010. Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. New York: Pantheon Books. Ackerman, Diane 1991. A Natural History of the Senses. New York: Vintage Books. Argyle, Michael 1988. Bodily Communication. New York: Methuen. Barbieri, Marcello 2003. The Organic Codes. An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bateson, Gregory 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine. Bekoff, Marc 2007. The Emotional Lives of Animals. Novato, Canada: New World Library. Bekoff, Marc 2008. Animals at Play. Rules of the Game. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Bekoff, Marc; Pierce, Jessica 2009. Wild Justice: The Moral Lives of Animals. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Böll, Mette Miriam Rakel 2008. Social is emotional. Biosemiotics 1: 329–345. Bouissac, Paul 2010. Semiotics at the Circus. Semiotics, Communication and Cognition 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Bradbury, Jack W.; Vehrencamp, Sandra L. 2011. Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd Ed. Sunderland: Sinauer. Brock, Friedrich 1939. Typenlehre und Umweltforschung: Grundlegung einer idealistischen Biologie (= Bios vol. 9). Leipzig: Verlag von Johann Ambrosium Barth. Buchanan, Brett 2008. Onto-ethologies: The Animal Environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau, and Deleuze. New York: SUNY Press. Burghardt, Gordon M. 2008. Updating von Uexküll: New directions in communication research. Journal of Comparative Psychology 122, 332–334. Carmeli, Yoram S. 2003. On human-to-animal communication: Biosemiotics and folk perceptions in zoos and circuses. Semiotica 146(3/4): 51–68. Chang, Han-liang 2003. Notes towards a semiotics of parasitism. Sign Systems Studies 31.2: 421–439.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Conflict "1,
    ANIMAL CONFLICT "1, ...... '", .. r.", . r ",~ Illustrated by Leslie M. Downie Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow ANIMAL CONFLICT Felicity A. Huntingford and Angela K. Turner Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow .-~ ' ..... '. .->, I , f . ~ :"fI London New York CHAPMAN AND HALL Chapman and Hall Animal Behaviour Series SERIES EDITORS D.M. Broom Colleen Macleod Professor of Animal Welfare, University of Cambridge, UK P.W. Colgan Professor of Biology, Queen's University, Canada Detailed studies of behaviour are important in many areas of physiology, psychology, zoology and agriculture. Each volume in this series will provide a concise and readable account of a topic of fundamental importance and current interest in animal behaviour, at a level appropriate for senior under­ graduates and research workers. Many facets of the study ofanimal behaviour will be explored and the topics included will reflect the broad scope of the subject. The major areas to be covered will range from behavioural ecology and sociobiology to general behavioural mechanisms and physiological psychology. Each volume will provide a rigorous and balanced view of the subject although authors will be given the freedom to develop material in their own way. To Tim) Joan and Jessica) with thanks) and to all the children who provided inspiration First published in 1987 by Chapmatl and Hall Ltd 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Published in the USA by Chapman atld Hall 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1987 Felicity A. Huntingford and Angela K. Turner Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1987 ISBN -13: 978-94-010-9008-7 This title is available in both hardbound and paperback editions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Some Aspects of Avian Field Ethology 1
    A REVIEW OF SOME ASPECTS OF AVIAN FIELD ETHOLOGY 1 ROBERT W. FICKEN AND MILLICENT S. FICKEN T•E last 30 yearshave seen the developmentof a new approachto the study of behavior, which has increasinglyinterested ornithologists as they have attemptedto understandavian biologyfully. This new ap- proachis now known as ethology. Both amateur and professionalorni- thologistshave contributedto its progressfrom the beginning. A basictenet of ethologyis that all behaviorof animalscan eventually be understood.The ethologistattempts to explainbehavior functionally (what doesit do for the animal?), causally(what are the internal and externalfactors responsible for each given behavior?),and evolutionarily (what is the probablephylogeny of the behavior,how doesit contribute to th'esurvival of the species,and what are the selectivepressures acting uponit?) (seeTinbergen, 1951, 1959; Hinde, 1959b). Somebasic proceduresare essentialin an ethologicalstudy (Hinde, 1959b: 564). The first step is to describeand classifyall the behavior of an animal, at the same time, if possible,dividing the behavior into logicalunits which can be dealt with furtherin other disciplines--particu- larly physiologyand ecology(see Russellet al., 1954). Althoughstudies often beginqualitatively, they eventuallyshould be quantified. Generali- zations,which are to be valid for many species,must be basedon work using closelyrelated speciesfirst, and more distantly related ones later. The animal is studied as an integrated whole. Some workers, notably Konrad Lorenz, keep and breed animalsin captivity under closescrutiny. Most of this paper dealswith communicationof birds. We have stressed particularly the analysisof displays,their evolution,and their relation to taxonomy--topicsof great interest to systematicornithologists as well as to ethologists.In addition, we discusscertain maintenanceactivities. LITERATURE OF ET•OLOC¾ Much of the early ethologicalliterature appearedin Europeanpublications, but it is now also appearingin this country frequently.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Dominance: a Behavioral Mechanism for Resource Allocation in Crayfish
    SOCIAL DOMINANCE: A BEHAVIORAL MECHANISM FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION IN CRAYFISH Kandice Christine Fero A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2008 Committee: Paul Moore, Advisor Verner Bingman Graduate Faculty Representative Sheryl Coombs Rex Lowe Steve Vessey ii ABSTRACT Paul Moore, Advisor Social dominance is often equated with priority of access to resources and higher relative fitness. But the consequences of dominance are not always readily advantageous for an individual and therefore, testing of such assumptions is needed in order to appropriately characterize mechanisms of resource competition in animal systems. This dissertation examined the ecological consequences of dominance in crayfish. Specifically, the following questions were addressed: is resource allocation determined by dominance and how does the structure of resources in an environment affect dominance relationships? By examining the mechanism of how dominance may allocate resources in groups of crayfish, we can begin to answer questions concerning what environmental selective pressures are shaping social behavior in this system. Shelter acquisition and use was examined in a combination of natural, semi-natural, and laboratory studies in order to observe dominance relationships under ecologically relevant conditions. The work presented here shows that: (1) social status has persisting behavioral consequences with regard to shelter use, which are modulated by social context; (2) dominance relationships influence the spatial distribution of crayfish in natural environments such that dominant individuals possess access to more space; (3) resource use strategies differ depending on social history and these strategies may influence larger scale segregation across habitats; and finally, (4) shelter distribution modulates the extent to which social history and shelter ownership influence the formation of subsequent dominance relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggressive Behavior in the Genus Gallus Sp1
    Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola ISSN 1516-635X Jan - Mar 2006 / v.8 / n.1 / 01 - 14 Aggressive behavior in the genus Gallus sp1 Author(s) ABSTRACT Queiroz SA2 The intensification of the production system in the poultry industry Cromberg VU3 and the vertical integration of the poultry agribusiness have brought 1 Funded by Associação de Criadores e de profound changes in the physical and social environment of domestic Preservação das Raças de Galos Combatentes. fowls in comparison to their ancestors and have modified the expression 2 Departamento de Zootecnia, Faculdade de of aggression and submission. The present review has covered the Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias de studies focusing on the different aspects linked to aggressiveness in Jaboticabal, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) the genus Gallus. The evaluated studies have shown that aggressiveness 3 ETCO Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em and subordination are complex behavioral expressions that involve Etologia e Ecologia - UNESP/FCAV genetic differences between breeds, strains and individuals, and differences in the cerebral development during growth, in the hormonal metabolism, in the rearing conditions of individuals, including feed restriction, density, housing type (litter or cage), influence of the opposite Mail Address sex during the growth period, existence of hostile stimuli (pain and Sandra Aidar de Queiroz frustration), ability to recognize individuals and social learning. The Departamento de Zootecnia utilization of fighting birds as experimental material in the study of Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias de Jaboticabal - UNESP mechanisms that have influence on the manifestation of aggressiveness Via de acesso Prof. Paulo D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Agonistic Behavior in the Bluebanded Goby (Lythrypnus Dalli)
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Neuroscience Institute Dissertations Neuroscience Institute 12-18-2014 The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Agonistic Behavior in the Bluebanded Goby (Lythrypnus dalli) Tessa Solomon-Lane Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/neurosci_diss Recommended Citation Solomon-Lane, Tessa, "The Causes and Consequences of Variation in Agonistic Behavior in the Bluebanded Goby (Lythrypnus dalli)." Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2014. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/neurosci_diss/14 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Neuroscience Institute at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Neuroscience Institute Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN THE BLUEBANDED GOBY (LYTHRYPNUS DALLI) by TESSA K. SOLOMON-LANE Under the Direction of Matthew S. Grober, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Social species are faced with the challenge of navigating a lifetime of dynamic social contexts. Social behavior is a critical target for natural selection because expressing behaviors appropriate for a given social context has important fitness consequences. Context-specific behavior is promoted by proximate regulators that are reciprocally influenced by behavioral expression and the social environment, such as hormones and social experience. This dissertation utilizes an integrative approach to investigate the causes and consequences of variation in agonistic behavior in the bluebanded goby (Lythrypnus dalli) across a range of relevant social contexts. This highly social, sex changing fish forms linear hierarchies of a dominant male and multiple subordinate females, and patterns of agonistic interaction are strongly linked to reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network Analysis of Agonistic Behaviour and Its Association with Economically Important Traits in Pigs
    animals Article Social Network Analysis of Agonistic Behaviour and Its Association with Economically Important Traits in Pigs Saif Agha 1,2,* , Emma Fàbrega 3 , Raquel Quintanilla 1 and Juan Pablo Sánchez 1 1 Animal Breeding and Genetics, Institute for Food and Agriculture Research and Technology (IRTA), Caldes de Montbui, 08140 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (R.Q.); [email protected] (J.P.S.) 2 Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Shubra Alkhaima, Cairo 11241, Egypt 3 Animal Welfare Program, Institute for Food and Agriculture Research and Technology (IRTA), Monells, 17121 Girona, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 September 2020; Accepted: 12 November 2020; Published: 16 November 2020 Simple Summary: Aggression behaviour has several negative consequences on the performance and welfare of pigs. Here, a Social Network Analysis (SNA) approach was employed to (1) identify individual traits that describe the role of each animal in the aggression; (2) investigate the association of these traits with performance and feeding behaviour traits. The study was conducted on 326 Duroc pigs reared in 29 pens. Several individual centrality traits were identified and used to calculate the Social Rank Index. The Dominant, Subordinate, and Isolated animals represented 21.1%, 57.5% and 21.4%, respectively. No significant correlations were observed between out-degree (number of initiated agonistic behaviours) and growth traits, indicating the similarity of growth patterns for dominant and non-dominant animals. Furthermore, out-degree was correlated positively with average daily occupation time (time at the feeder/day) and average daily feeding frequency (number of visits to the feeder/day), but negatively with average daily feeding rate (gr/min).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Network Analysis in Farm Animals: Sensor-Based Approaches
    animals Review Social Network Analysis in Farm Animals: Sensor-Based Approaches Suresh Neethirajan * and Bas Kemp Adaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-634230246 Simple Summary: Social behaviour of farm animals significantly impacts management interventions in the livestock sector and, thereby, animal welfare. Evaluation and monitoring of social networks between farm animals help not only to understand the bonding and agonistic behaviours among individuals but also the interactions between the animals and the animal caretaker. The interrelation- ship between social and environmental conditions, and the subtle changes in the behaviours of farm animals can be understood and precisely measured only by using sensing technologies. This review aims to highlight the use of sensing technologies in the investigation of social network analysis of farm animals. Abstract: Natural social systems within animal groups are an essential aspect of agricultural op- timization and livestock management strategy. Assessing elements of animal behaviour under domesticated conditions in comparison to natural behaviours found in wild settings has the potential to address issues of animal welfare effectively, such as focusing on reproduction and production success. This review discusses and evaluates to what extent social network analysis (SNA) can be Citation: Neethirajan, S.; Kemp, B. incorporated with sensor-based data collection methods, and what impact the results may have Social Network Analysis in Farm concerning welfare assessment and future farm management processes. The effectiveness and critical Animals: Sensor-Based Approaches. features of automated sensor-based technologies deployed in farms include tools for measuring Animals 2021, 11, 434.
    [Show full text]
  • Grooming As an Agonistic Behavior in Garnett’S Small-Eared Bushbaby (Otolemur Garnettii)
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Spring 5-2017 Grooming as an Agonistic Behavior in Garnett’s Small-Eared Bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii) Jennie L. Christopher University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Comparative Psychology Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Christopher, Jennie L., "Grooming as an Agonistic Behavior in Garnett’s Small-Eared Bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii)" (2017). Master's Theses. 289. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/289 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GROOMING AS AN AGONISTIC BEHAVIOR IN GARNETT’S SMALL-EARED BUSHBABY (OTOLEMUR GARNETTII) by Jennie L. Christopher A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School and the Department of Psychology at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Approved: ________________________________________________ Dr. Heidi Lyn, Committee Chair Assistant Professor, Psychology ________________________________________________ Dr. Alen Hajnal, Committee Member Associate Professor, Psychology ________________________________________________ Dr. Richard Mohn,
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Electroreception and Electrogenesis
    2022_C012.fm Page 431 Tuesday, June 7, 2005 4:03 PM Electroreception and 12 Electrogenesis James S. Albert and William G.R. Crampton CONTENTS I. Introduction to Electroreception and Electrogenesis ........................................................432 II. Phylogeny of Electroreception and Electrogenesis...........................................................433 III. Passive Electroreception ....................................................................................................437 A. Electroreception and Mechanoreception: Vertebrate Laterosensory Systems..........438 B. Electroreception in Lampreys....................................................................................438 C. Electroreception in Gnathostomes.............................................................................439 1. Electroreception in Chondrichthyans ..................................................................439 2. Passive Electroreception in Electric Skates and Rays ........................................440 3. Nonteleost Bony Fishes.......................................................................................441 D. Electroreception in Teleosts ......................................................................................441 1. Passive Electroreception in Weakly Electrogenic Siluriformes..........................442 2. Transition from Electric Communication to Active Electroreception................442 IV. Active Electroreception......................................................................................................443
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary Bibliography and Further Readings
    Commentary Bibliography and Further Readings The following bibliography of primary and secondary literature consulted in the preparation of this volume is by no means exhaustive. Rather, I have here com- piled a few short lists of only the most representative primary readings sufficient for the reader to attain a solid introductory grounding in each author’s main ideas, and have augmented such lists with a number of suggested and easily accessible sec- ondary readings meant to contextualize the author’s works and their reception within the relevant fields of discourse. When consulting these chapter bibliographies and list of suggested further readings, please note that each reprinted selection in this anthology also contains its own original citation list that has been reprinted at the conclusion of each selection. Many of these original reference lists (e.g., Anderson et al.) reveal state-of-the-art scholarship at the time of their writing, and provide critically important bibliographic information that has not been reproduced on the following lists of suggested introductory readings. By using both sets of lists in tan- dem, however, and by following the trail of signs that appear as reference texts beget further reference texts, the reader should be able to proceed from the readings con- tained in this introductory anthology to an increasingly full acquaintance with the extant scholarship in the field. – D.F. Donald Francis Favareau (Pages 1a–1z) Primary Literature Favareau, D. (2001). Beyond self and other: The neurosemiotic emergence of intersubjectivity. Sign Systems Studies, 30(1), 57–101. Favareau, D. (2002). Constructing representema: On the neurosemiotics of self and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Facial Expression As a Potential Measure of Both Intent and Emotion Camerlink, I; Coulange, E; Farish, M; Baxter, EM; Turner, SP
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SRUC - Scotland's Rural College Scotland's Rural College Facial expression as a potential measure of both intent and emotion Camerlink, I; Coulange, E; Farish, M; Baxter, EM; Turner, SP Published in: Scientific Reports DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35905-3 First published: 04/12/2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Camerlink, I., Coulange, E., Farish, M., Baxter, EM., & Turner, SP. (2018). Facial expression as a potential measure of both intent and emotion. Scientific Reports, 8, [17602]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35905-3 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 19. Oct. 2019 www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Facial expression as a potential measure of both intent and emotion Received: 31 May 2018 Irene Camerlink 1,2, Estelle Coulange1, Marianne Farish1, Emma M.
    [Show full text]