SEPARATING ALBATROSSES Tristan Or Wandering?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SEPARATING ALBATROSSES Tristan Or Wandering? 1 2 3 4 EPARATING LBATROSSES 5 S A 6 7 8 Tristan or Wandering? 9 10 Text and photographs by Peter Ryan 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 A Tristan Albatross fledgling on Inaccessible Island. Note the paler, greyer plumage than 52 that of a Wandering Albatross of the same age. 53 54 55 Two types of Wandering Albatross occur off southern Africa: the larger, 56 57 southern-breeding Diomedea [e.] exulans and the smaller D. [e.] dabbenena from 58 Tristan and Gough. They are now treated as separate species by most 59 60 authorities, but how easy is it in fact to separate the two species in the field? 61 62 AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2000 TRISTAN & WANDERING ALBATROSSES 35 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 A nine-year-old Tristan Albatross 6 7 (presumed female) breeding at 7 8 Gough Island (far left) appears 8 9 similar to a dark, five-year-old 9 10 non-breeding Wandering 10 11 Albatross on Marion Island (cen- 11 12 tre), and is considerably darker 12 13 than another five-year-old non- 13 14 breeding female Wanderer (left). 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 sis. 8 500 pairs at Antipodes and Campbell islands, 22 23 lbatross taxonomy has undergone some New Zealand; ranges through the South Pacific. 23 24 radical changes in the last five years, 24 25 expanding from 14 species to as many Gibson’s Albatross Diomedea [e.] gibsoni. rguments about the validity of these southern Africa. In the hand, the Tristan Albatross 25 26 as 24 species in four genera (see Africa – Birds & 10 000 pairs at Auckland Islands (south of New splits are ongoing, but this shouldn’t is smaller than a Wandering Albatross of the same 26 27 ABirding 2(1): 35). The great albatrosses have been Zealand); ranges through the South Pacific. deter birders from attempting to iden- sex. But this is of no use in the field, and little has 27 28 most affected, with seven species in the complex: tify the great albatrosses as far as possible, if only been published on how to separate the various 28 29 Diomedea amsterdamensis. Ato provide additional information about the rang- Wander ing Albatrosses at sea. 29 Amsterdam Albatross 30 Wandering Albatross Diomedea [exulans] exulans. 20 pairs at Amsterdam Island; range presumably es of these birds. During the summer of 1999/2000 I was fortu- 30 31 14 000 pairs breed at South Georgia, Marion and South Indian Ocean. Field criteria for separating the two Royal nate to spend several weeks on Gough Island and 31 32 Prince Edward, Crozet, Kerguelen and Macquarie Albatrosses are well known (summarised in Harrison three months on Inaccessible Island, which 32 33 islands; ranges throughout the Southern Ocean. Southern Royal Albatross Diomedea [epomopho- 1983), and both species occur off southern Africa. together are home to all Tristan Albatrosses. Then, 33 34 This species is also sometimes referred to as the ra] epomophora. 13 000 pairs at Campbell and The Northern Royal Albatross is a rare but still in April 2000, I spent three weeks on Marion 34 35 Snowy Albatross D. [e.] chionoptera. Auckland islands and hybridises with Northern regular visitor to the continental shelf. The Southern Island, where there is a large population of nomi- 35 36 Royals at Taiaroa Head, Otago, New Zealand; rang- Royal is rarer, with fewer than five southern nate Wandering Albatrosses. Here are my prelimi- 36 37 Tristan Albatross Diomedea [e.] dabbenena. es primarily through the South Pacific, but some African records, but recent observations suggest that nary conclusions about the possibility of separat- 37 38 2 500 pairs at Gough and Inaccessible islands, and throughout the Southern Ocean. it is frequent in the Roaring Forties south of Africa. ing the two taxa in the field. 38 39 Tristan da Cunha; ranges through the South Atlan- Recoveries of banded birds and measurements of 39 40 tic, and at least occasionally reaches Australia. Northern Royal Albatross Diomedea [e.] dead birds confirm that both nominate Wandering 40 41 sanfordi. 8 600 pairs at Chatham Island and Taiaroa (exulans) and Tristan (dabbenena) albatrosses visit 41 42 Antipodean Albatross Diomedea [e.] antipoden- Head; range as for Southern Royal Albatross. 42 43 43 44 44 45 46 47 48 A 17-year-old Tristan Albatross ä 49 (presumed male) breeding at Gough 50 Island (right) is slightly darker on the 51 wings than a seven-year-old non- 52 breeding male Wandering Albatross at 53 Marion (centre), and considerably dark- 54 er than a 13-year-old breeding male 55 Wanderer (far right). 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 36 TRISTAN & WANDERING ALBATROSSES AFRICA – BIRDS & BIRDING AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2000 TRISTAN & WANDERING ALBATROSSES 37 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 of plumage pattern at sea is not helpful in sexing need to be examined. Wandering Albatrosses are 8 9 birds, apart from the very whitest males. Females characterised by considerable variation in plumage 9 10 are on average smaller than males, and with prac- between individuals even of the same age and sex. 10 11 tice, given a good look at the bill, the sex can be In 2000/01 ornithologists will be based at Gough 11 12 determined fairly reliably. Males have noticeably Island for a full year, and one of their tasks will be 12 13 deeper bills than females, with less of a slender to gather more information on plumage develop- 13 14 saddle behind the nail. ment in Tristan Albatrosses. 14 15 15 16 16 17 Tristan or Wandering? Implications for birders 17 18 18 19 Since the 1970s, several thousand albatross chicks Assuming that there is no easy way to separate 19 20 have been banded at both Gough and Marion Tristan and Wandering albatrosses in the field, 20 21 islands. I compared known-age and -sex birds and birders might be tempted to reject the notion of 21 22 described extreme forms in the breeding popula- recognising them as distinct species. But this has 22 23 tions. The photographs on pages 36 and 37 tell the some interesting consequences. The genetic evi- 23 24 story. In brief, faced with a single bird at sea, of dence suggests that the Amsterdam Albatross is 24 25 unknown age and sex, I could find no definitive most similar to the widespread, nominate 25 26 character that allows separation, but there are Wandering Albatross (Nunn & Stanley, 1998). The 26 27 some possible differences that require further two New Zealand forms, gibsoni and antipodensis, 27 28 investigation. form another species pair, with the Tristan 28 29 Juvenile Tristan Albatrosses leave the nest in a Albatross being the most distinct form. The point 29 30 paler, greyer plumage than Wandering Albatrosses, is that if we recognise the Amsterdam Albatross as 30 31 but we don’t know how this plumage changes a ‘good’ species – which most birders are happy to 31 32 until the birds return to their breeding islands. do – then we should recognise at least the Tristan 32 33 © PETER RYAN Tristan Albatrosses take longer to replace the juve- and New Zealand populations as distinct from 33 34 nile plumage than Wandering Albatrosses. Most southern, nominate Wanderers. 34 35 breeding Tristans have a large amount of black on Unfortunately, this type of problem is going to 35 36 the upperwing (corresponding to Harrison’s stages become ever more prevalent as types of evidence 36 37 4 and 5), whereas most breeding Wanderers at not readily apparent in the field (for example 37 38 Inferred plumage sequence of the Tristan Albatross, showing upperparts (above) and underparts (below), Marion are stages 5 to 7. However, I did see a few genetic and skeletal characters) are used to define 38 39 based on field sketches and photographs. Birds become progressively paler from fledglings (left) to old Tristans on Gough that had almost all-white wing bird species. There is no easy solution for birders – 39 40 males (right). Note the retention of prominent breast bands on birds with pale backs. coverts and no dark feathers visible in the tail the best we can do is to use our birding skills to 40 41 (stage 7, and see figure on page 38). The same pat- try to detect visible differences, and learn to 41 42 tern of delayed whitening occurs among the two accept that it may not be possible to identify 42 43 New Zealand forms, Gibson’s and Antipodean alba- some birds to species. 43 44 trosses. 44 45 Tristan Albatrosses begin breeding at an earlier 45 46 age, starting as young as six, with the average age Further reading 46 47 Complex plumage patterns On the underparts the pencilling often forms a of first breeding being eight to nine years, com- Harrison, P. 1983. Seabirds: An Identification 47 48 breast band, with some brown mottling persisting pared with 10 to 12 in Wandering Albatrosses. But Guide. Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent. 48 49 The Wandering Albatross is well known for its on the thighs and undertail coverts. Pencilling also this doesn’t account for the darker plumage of 49 Nunn, G.B. & Stanley, S.E. 1998. ‘Body size 50 complex series of age-related plumage changes. replaces the mottling on the back and rump, adults.
Recommended publications
  • Proposal for Inclusion of the Antipodean Albatross in Appendix I
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP13/Doc. 27.1.7 MIGRATORY 25 September 2019 Original: English SPECIES 13th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Gandhinagar, India, 17 - 22 February 2020 Agenda Item 27.1 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE ANTIPODEAN ALBATROSS (Diomedea antipodensis) ON APPENDIX I OF THE CONVENTION Summary: The Governments of New Zealand, Australia and Chile have submitted the attached proposal for the inclusion of the Antipodean albatross (Diomedea antipodensis) on Appendix I of CMS. The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CMS Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. UNEP/CMS/COP13/Doc. 27.1.7 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF THE ANTIPODEAN ALBATROSS (Diomedea antipodensis) ON APPENDIX I OF THE CONVENTION A. PROPOSAL Inclusion of Diomedea antipodensis on the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) Appendix I. The current CMS Appendix II listing will remain in place. Diomedea antipodensis is classified as Endangered (IUCN) as it is undergoing a very rapid decline in population size. B. PROPONENT: Governments of New Zealand, Australia and Chile. C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Aves 1.2 Order: Procellariiformes 1.3 Family: Diomedeidae (albatrosses) 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: Diomedea antipodensis (Robertson & Warham 1992), including two subspecies: Diomedea antipodensis antipodensis and Diomedea antipodensis gibsoni 1.5 Scientific synonyms: Diomedea exulans antipodensis Diomedea antipodensis was formerly included in the wandering albatross complex (Diomedea exulans) (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seabird Bycatch in U.S. West Coast Fisheries, 2002-18
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-165 https://doi.org/10.25923/78vk-v149 Seabird Bycatch in U.S. West Coast Fisheries, 2002–18 March 2021 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum Series NMFS-NWFSC The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC series to issue scientific and technical publications that have received thorough internal scientific review and editing. Reviews are transparent collegial reviews, not anonymous peer reviews. Documents within this series represent sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. The Northwest Fisheries Science Center’s NOAA Technical Memorandum series continues the NMFS-F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Science Center, which subsequently was divided into the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. The latter uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC series. NOAA Technical Memorandums NMFS-NWFSC are available from the NOAA Institutional Repository,https://repository.library.noaa.gov . Any mention throughout this document of trade names or commercial companies is for identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. Reference this document as follows: Jannot, J. E., A. Wuest, T. P. Good, K. A. Somers, V. J. Tuttle, K. E. Richerson, R. S. Shama, and J. T. McVeigh. 2021. Seabird Bycatch in U.S. West Coast Fisheries, 2002–18. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-165.
    [Show full text]
  • MAGNIFICENT FRIGATEBIRD Fregata Magnificens
    PALM BEACH DOLPHIN PROJECT FACT SHEET The Taras Oceanographic Foundation 5905 Stonewood Court - Jupiter, FL 33458 - (561-762-6473) [email protected] MAGNIFICENT FRIGATEBIRD Fregata magnificens CLASS: Aves ORDER: Suliformes FAMILY: Fregatidae GENUS: Fregata SPECIES: magnificens A long-winged, fork-tailed bird of tropical oceans, the Magnificent Frigatebird is an agile flier that snatches food off the surface of the ocean and steals food from other birds. It breeds mostly south of the United States, but wanders northward along the coasts during nonbreeding season. Physical Appearance: Frigate birds are the only seabirds where the male and female look strikingly different. All have pre- dominantly black plumage, long, deeply forked tails and long hooked bills. Females have white underbellies and males have a distinctive red throat pouch, which they inflate during the breeding season to attract females Their wings are long and pointed and can span up to 2.3 meters (7.5 ft), the largest wing area to body weight ratio of any bird. These birds are about 35-45 inches ((89 to 114 cm) in length, and weight between 35 and 67 oz (1000-1900 g). The bones of frigate birds are markedly pneumatic (filled with air), making them very light and contribute only 5% to total body weight. The pectoral girdle (shoulder joint) is strong as its bones are fused. Habitat: Frigate birds are found across all tropical oceans. Breeding habitats include mangrove cays on coral reefs, and decidu- ous trees and bushes on dry islands. Feeding range while breeding includes shallow water within lagoons, coral reefs, and deep ocean out of sight of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Plumage and Sexual Maturation in the Great Frigatebird Fregata Minor in the Galapagos Islands
    Valle et al.: The Great Frigatebird in the Galapagos Islands 51 PLUMAGE AND SEXUAL MATURATION IN THE GREAT FRIGATEBIRD FREGATA MINOR IN THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS CARLOS A. VALLE1, TJITTE DE VRIES2 & CECILIA HERNÁNDEZ2 1Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Campus Cumbayá, Jardines del Este y Avenida Interoceánica (Círculo de Cumbayá), PO Box 17–12–841, Quito, Ecuador ([email protected]) 2Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, PO Box 17–01–2184, Quito, Ecuador Received 6 September 2005, accepted 12 August 2006 SUMMARY VALLE, C.A., DE VRIES, T. & HERNÁNDEZ, C. 2006. Plumage and sexual maturation in the Great Frigatebird Fregata minor in the Galapagos Islands. Marine Ornithology 34: 51–59. The adaptive significance of distinctive immature plumages and protracted sexual and plumage maturation in birds remains controversial. This study aimed to establish the pattern of plumage maturation and the age at first breeding in the Great Frigatebird Fregata minor in the Galapagos Islands. We found that Great Frigatebirds attain full adult plumage at eight to nine years for females and 10 to 11 years for males and that they rarely attempted to breed before acquiring full adult plumage. The younger males succeeded only at attracting a mate, and males and females both bred at the age of nine years when their plumage was nearly completely adult. Although sexual maturity was reached as early as nine years, strong competition for nest-sites may further delay first reproduction. We discuss our findings in light of the several hypotheses for explaining delayed plumage maturation in birds, concluding that slow sexual and plumage maturation in the Great Frigatebird, and perhaps among all frigatebirds, may result from moult energetic constraints during the subadult stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshop to Review Seabird Bycatch Mitigation Measures for Hawaii’S Pelagic Longline Fisheries September 18-19, 2018
    Report of the Workshop to Review Seabird Bycatch Mitigation Measures for Hawaii’s Pelagic Longline Fisheries September 18-19, 2018 November 2018 Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813 A report of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813 Edited by Eric Gilman and Asuka Ishizaki © Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 2018. All rights reserved. Published in the United States by the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council ISBN: 978-1-944827-37-3 ii Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council – wpcouncil.org CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................... iii 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 2 MEETING OBJECTIVES, TARGET OUTPUTS ...................................................................... 6 3 WORKSHOP STRUCTURE AND PARTICIPANTS ................................................................ 7 4 MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 8 4.1. Seabird regulations for the Hawaii pelagic longline deep- and shallow-set longline fisheries ....................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 WCPFC and IATTC seabird bycatch
    [Show full text]
  • Energetics and Morphometrics of Non-Breeding Albatrosses Henry Battam University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2010 Energetics and morphometrics of non-breeding albatrosses Henry Battam University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Battam, Henry, Energetics and morphometrics of non-breeding albatrosses, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, University of Wollongong. School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2010. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3245 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. Thesis Certification CERTIFICATION I, Henry Battam, declare that this thesis, submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not been submitted for qualifications at any other academic institution. Henry Battam 27 August 2010 Energetics and Morphometrics of non‐ breeding albatrosses A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG by Henry Battam B.E. (Hons) School of Biological Sciences 2010 Abstract The synchronous catastrophic mortality in the semelparous cuttlefish (Sepia apama), is an annual winter event in the coastal waters of southern Australia. This creates an abundant food resource that attracts large numbers of
    [Show full text]
  • BYC-08 INF J(A) ACAP: Update on the Conservation Status
    INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE NINTH MEETING La Jolla, California (USA) 14-18 May 2018 DOCUMENT BYC-08 INF J(a) UPDATE ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS, DISTRIBUTION AND PRIORITIES FOR ALBATROSSES AND LARGE PETRELS Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP) and BirdLife International 1. STATUS AND TRENDS OF ALBATROSSES AND PETRELS Seabirds are amongst the most globally-threatened of all groups of birds, and conservation issues specific to albatrosses and large petrels led to drafting of the multi-lateral Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP). A review of the conservation status and priorities for albatrosses and large petrels was recently published in Biological Conservation (Phillips et al. 2016). There are currently 31 species listed in Annex 1 of the Agreement. Of these, 21 (68%) are classified at risk of extinction, a stark contrast to the overall rate of 12% for the 10,694 bird species worldwide (Croxall et al. 2012, Gill & Donsker 2017). Of the 22 species of albatrosses listed by ACAP, three are listed as Critically Endangered (CR), six are Endangered (EN), six are Vulnerable (VU), six are Near Threatened (NT), and one is of Least Concern (LC). Of the nine petrel species, one is listed as CR, one as EN, four as VU, one as NT and two species as LC. The population trends of ACAP species over the last twenty years (since the mid-1990s) were re-examined in 2017 by the ACAP Population and Conservation Status Working Group (PaCSWG). Thirteen ACAP species (42%) are currently showing overall population declines.
    [Show full text]
  • Involving the Community in Rodent Eradication on Tristan Da Cunha Island Invasives: Eradication and Management
    Varnham, K.; T. Glass, and C. Stringer. Involving the community in rodent eradication on Tristan da Cunha Island invasives: eradication and management Involving the community in rodent eradication on Tristan da Cunha K. Varnham1, T. Glass2, and C. Stringer3 1 University of Bristol, School of Biological Sciences, Woodland Rd, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK. <karen.varnham@bristol. ac.uk>. 2 Government of Tristan da Cunha. 3The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Potton Rd, Sandy, UK. Abstract Tristan da Cunha is the world’s remotest inhabited island, with a population of around 270 people. Ship rats (Rattus rattus) and house mice (Mus musculus) are present on the main island of Tristan and house mice are present on Gough Island, also part of the UK Overseas Territory of Tristan da Cunha. The impacts of invasive rodents on both islands have been well documented and detailed plans to eradicate them were developed in association with island representatives. In March 2008, the island was visited to discuss eradication plans with the island community and get their views on the proposals. Information disseminated about the project was followed by individual meetings with all government departments and other employers. These individual meetings proved by far the most effective forum for hearing people’s views. Strong concerns were expressed about the safety of an aerial bait drop on Tristan, in particular the perceived risks to children, livestock and the security of the water supply. The proposed eradication of mice from Gough Island was fully supported. Although the population on Tristan did not want a full-scale rodent eradication carried out on the island, they were keen to have improved rodent control around the settlement and at agricultural sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparations for the Eradication of Mice from Gough Island: Results of Bait Acceptance Trials Above Ground and Around Cave Systems
    Cuthbert, R.J.; P. Visser, H. Louw, K. Rexer-Huber, G. Parker, and P.G. Ryan. Preparations for the eradication of mice from Gough Island: results of bait acceptance trials above ground and around cave systems Preparations for the eradication of mice from Gough Island: results of bait acceptance trials above ground and around cave systems R. J. Cuthbert1, P. Visser1, H. Louw1, K. Rexer-Huber1, G. Parker1, and P. G. Ryan2 1Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL, United Kingdom. <[email protected]>. 2DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. Abstract Gough Island, Tristan da Cunha, is a United Kingdom Overseas Territory, supports globally important seabird colonies, has many endemic plant, invertebrate and bird taxa, and is recognised as a World Heritage Site. A key threat to the biodiversity of Gough Island is predation by the introduced house mouse (Mus musculus), as a result of which two bird species are listed as Critically Endangered. Eradicating mice from Gough Island is thus an urgent conservation priority. However, the higher failure rate of mouse versus rat eradications, and smaller size of islands that have been successfully cleared of mice, means that trials on bait acceptance are required to convince funding agencies that an attempted eradication of mice from Gough is likely to succeed. In this study, trials of bait acceptance were undertaken above ground and around cave systems that are potential refuges for mice during an aerial application of bait. Four trials were undertaken during winter, with rhodamine-dyed, non-toxic bait spread by hand at 16 kg/ha over 2.56 ha centred above cave systems in Trials 1-3 and over 20.7 ha and two caves in Trial 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Census of Northern Royal Albatross on the Sisters And
    Aerial Census of Northern Royal Albatross ( Diomedea sanfordi ) fledglings on Rangitatahi (The Sisters) and Motuhara (Forty-Fours), July 2017 Northern royal albatross chicks, Middle Sister Island (photo credit: Sarah Matthew©) Peter G.H. Frost Science Support Service 87 Ikitara Road Whanganui 4500 December 2017 (amended and expanded 6 March 2018 ) Aerial census Northern Royal Albatross chicks—July 2017 Executive Summary 1. A mixed-method census of the northern royal albatross population nesting on The Sisters and Motuhara/Forty-Fours, conducted in November–December 2016, provided the opportunity to determine breeding success through a follow-up census of late-stage fledglings eight months later. 2. The census was carried out on 27 July 2017 by Department of Conservation staff who took a comprehensive set of aerial photographs that blanketed the islands at a range of scales. Sets of photographs were then demarcated to ensure no overlap or gaps in coverage, and the number of northern royal albatross chicks, adults and fresh carcasses counted. The numbers of northern giant petrels present on the islands prior to the start of breeding in August–September were also counted. 3. Overall, 2,116 royal albatross chicks were counted on the three islands: Big Sister, 574; Middle Sister, 539; and Motuhara, 1,003. Seventy-eight adult albatrosses and 17 carcasses of recently dead chicks were also recorded, along with at least 1,889 northern giant petrels, mostly concentrated on Motuhara (92 %). 4. If little or no further mortality occurred among these chicks before fledging, breeding (nesting) success for the 2016/17 breeding season would be around 48 % overall (The Sisters, 37 %; Motuhara, 58 %), considerably lower than the 64 % recorded at the small mainland colony on Taiaroa Head in the same season.
    [Show full text]