Genomics of Pear and Other Rosaceae Fruit Trees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Genomics of Pear and Other Rosaceae Fruit Trees Breeding Science 66: 148–159 (2016) doi:10.1270/jsbbs.66.148 Review Genomics of pear and other Rosaceae fruit trees Toshiya Yamamoto* and Shingo Terakami NARO Institute of Fruit Tree Science, 2­1 Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305­8605, Japan The family Rosaceae includes many economically important fruit trees, such as pear, apple, peach, cherry, quince, apricot, plum, raspberry, and loquat. Over the past few years, whole­genome sequences have been released for Chinese pear, European pear, apple, peach, Japanese apricot, and strawberry. These sequences help us to conduct functional and comparative genomics studies and to develop new cultivars with desirable traits by marker-assisted selection in breeding programs. These genomics resources also allow identification of evolutionary relationships in Rosaceae, development of genome­wide SNP and SSR markers, and construction of reference genetic linkage maps, which are available through the Genome Database for the Rosaceae web­ site. Here, we review the recent advances in genomics studies and their practical applications for Rosaceae fruit trees, particularly pear, apple, peach, and cherry. Key Words: apple, co­linearity, genome sequence, peach, pear, reference map. Introduction al. 1996). Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl.) is also an important fruit tree that belongs to the tribe Pyreae The family Rosaceae consists of about 2500 species from along with pears and apples. Several Prunus (“stone fruit”) 90 genera and includes diverse plants, which are primarily species are also important fruit trees and include peaches native to temperate regions (Hummer and Janick 2009). and nectarines (P. persica (L.) Batsch), plums (P. domestica This family was traditionally classified into several subfam­ L., P. salicina Lindl.), apricots (P. armeniaca L., P. mume ilies: Amygdaloideae, Maloideae, Rosoideae, Spiraeoideae, Siebold et Zucc.), and cherries (P. avium L., P. cerasus L.), and others (Hummer and Janick 2009). In 2007, three sub­ which belong to the subfamily Amygdaloideae, tribe families were suggested: Dryadoideae, Rosoideae and Amygdaleae. Annual world fruit production (in million Amygdaloideae (Potter et al. 2007); the latter subfamily tons) is as follows: peaches and nectarines, 21.6; plums, includes the former Amygdaloideae, Maloideae and 11.5; apricots, 4.1; and cherries 2.3 (FAOSTAT 2013). In Spiraeoideae. Many economically important crops produc­ Japan, domestic fruit production (in thousand tons) is as ing edible fruits (e.g., apple, apricot, cherry, loquat, peach, follows: apples, 742; pears, 294; peaches, 125; apricots, pear, plum, quince, raspberry, and strawberry), nuts (e.g., al­ 124; plums, 21; and cherries, 18 (FAOSTAT 2013). mond), and ornamentals (e.g., rose) belong to the Rosaceae. Basic chromosome number x = 7, 8, 9, 15 or 17 was ob­ The most economically important members of the served for Rosaceae members (Dirlewanger et al. 2009b, Rosaceae are apples (Malus × domestica Borkh.) and pears Evans and Campbell 2002, Potter et al. 2007). The subfami­ (Pyrus spp.), both of which belong to the subfamily ly Rosoideae, which contains rose, raspberry, and straw­ Amygdaloideae, tribe Pyreae. Annual world fruit production berry, has x = 7. The tribe Amygdaleae of subfamily of apples exceeds 80 million tons (FAOSTAT 2013), making Amygdaloideae, known for almond, apricot, cherry, peach, them the third most important fruit (after citrus and banana). and plum, has x = 8. The former subfamily Spiraeoideae Pears are the second most important fruit species in Rosaceae, (tribe Spiraeeae of subfamily Amygdaloideae,) has x = 9. with world production of approximately 25.2 million tons Basic chromosome number x = 17 is observed for the tribe (FAOSTAT 2013). Four important Pyrus species are com­ Pyreae of subfamily Amygdaloideae, which contains apple, mercially grown for edible fruit: Japanese pear (P. pyrifolia loquat, pear, and quince. Challice (1974, 1981) suggested Nakai), European pear (P. communis L.), and Chinese pears that the Pyreae was generated by an allopolyploidization (P. bretschneideri Rehd. and P. ussuriensis Maxim.) (Bell et event between “Amygdaleae” (x = 8) and “Spiraeeae” (x = 9). Recent molecular genetic studies contradicted the Communicated by M. Omura allopolyploidization and supported the autopolyploid origin Received September 10, 2015. Accepted January 12, 2016. of hybridization between closely related members of *Corresponding author (e­mail: [email protected]) Spiraeeae (Evans and Campbell 2002). Velasco et al. (2010) 148 Breeding Science Genomics of pear and other Rosaceae fruit trees Vol. 66 No. 1 BS showed that a relatively recent (ca. 50 million years ago) and covers a total of 577.3 Mb (96.2% of the estimated genome­wide duplication resulted in the transition from genome size, 600 Mb). A total of 43,419 putative genes nine ancestral chromosomes to 17 chromosomes in apple, were predicted, of which 1219 are unique to European pear based on whole­genome sequencing analysis. and are not found in other dicots plant genomes sequenced. In recent years, international collaborative studies by the Analysis of the expansin gene family and other cell wall­ Rosaceae research community have hastened progress in related genes showed their involvement in fruit softening developing genetic and genomic resources for representa­ in both European pear and apple. It is expected that pear tive crops such as apple (M. × domestica), peach (P. persica), genome sequences of Chinese and European pears will be and strawberry (Fragaria spp.) (Shulaev et al. 2008); this assigned to 17 pseudo­chromosomes, which will greatly strategy was based on a consensus that there are multiple help us to conduct genetics and genomics studies in pears. Rosaceae model species (Dirlewanger et al. 2009b). These An international consortium has published a draft ge­ resources, including expressed sequence tags (ESTs), bac­ nome sequence of the domesticated apple ‘Golden terial artificial chromosome (BAC) libraries, physical and Delicious’, a common founder cultivar in many breeding genetic maps, and molecular markers and bioinformatics programs (Velasco et al. 2010). The genome assembly of tools, are available through the Genome Database for the ‘Golden Delicious’ consists of 122,146 contigs spanning a Rosaceae (GDR; http://www.rosaceae.org). The availability total of 603.9 Mb (81.3% of the estimated genome, of this database has rendered various rosaceous crops highly 742.3 Mb). Seventeen pseudo­chromosomes (GDR, Malus amenable to functional and comparative genomics studies. × domestica Genome v1.0p) were obtained from these con­ Here we review recent progress in genomics studies on tigs. A total of 57,386 putative protein­coding genes were Rosaceae fruit trees such as apple, pear, peach, and cherry, predicted. The MADS-box gene family involved in flower and we discuss the newly accumulated knowledge and re­ and fruit development is expanded in apple to 15 members. sources for comparative genomics studies on this family. The other gene families related with transport and assimila­ tion of sorbitol are also expanded, and are involved in Genome sequences of Rosaceae fruit crops Rosaceae-specific metabolism. A high­quality draft reference genome sequence, Peach Whole­genome sequences have been reported for Chinese v1.0, of the doubled haploid genotype of the peach cultivar pear (Wu et al. 2013), European pear (Chagné et al. 2014), ‘Lovell’ has been reported (Verde et al. 2013). Since apple (Velasco et al. 2010), peach (Verde et al. 2013), Japa­ ‘Lovell’ is completely homozygous, its genome assembly nese apricot (Zhang et al. 2012), wild strawberry (Shulaev has facilitated obtaining a reliable and unbiased reference et al. 2011) and cultivated strawberry (Hirakawa et al. genome. Using 827 markers from an updated Prunus ref­ 2014) (Table 1). The draft genome of the Chinese pear erence map (Howad et al. 2005), Verde et al. (2013) or­ ‘Dangshansuli’ (P. bretschneideri) is now available (Wu et ganized 215.9 Mb of the Peach v1.0 genome into eight al. 2013). A total of 2103 scaffolds span 512.0 Mb (97.1% pseudomolecules covering 81.5% of the estimated genome of the estimated genome size, 527 Mb) and are not anchored (265 Mb). A total of 27,852 protein­coding genes were pre­ to the 17 chromosomes. The Chinese pear genome assembly dicted. Furthermore, comparative analyses showed that the contains 42,812 protein­coding genes, and about 28.5% of ancestral triplicated blocks in peach are detected, and that them encode multiple isoforms. The identified repetitive se­ putative paleoancestor regions are detectable. quences (271.9 Mb in total) account for 53.1% of the ge­ The genome of Japanese apricot or mei (P. mume) was nome. The difference in size between the pear and apple one of the first genomes to be sequenced in the subgenus genomes is mainly due to the presence of repetitive se­ Prunus of the genus Prunus (Zhang et al. 2012). Japanese quences (predominantly transposable elements), whereas apricot was domesticated in China more than 3000 years genic regions and protein­coding genes are similar in both ago as an ornamental plant and fruit tree. A 237­Mb genome species. A draft genome assembly of European pear assembly was generated from 29,989 scaffolds, 84.6% of ‘Bartlett’ (Chagné et al. 2014) contains 142,083 scaffolds which were further anchored to eight chromosomes in a Table 1. Details of whole­genome sequencing in Rosaceae crops Pyrus bretschneideri Pyrus communis Malus × domestica Prunus persica Prunus mume Fragaria vesca Common name Chinese pear European pear apple peach Japanese apricot woodland strawberry Cultivar name Dangshansuli Bartlett Golden Delicious Lovell BJFU1210120008 Hawaii 4 (PI551572) No. of contigs 25,312 182,196 122,146 – 45,592 – No. of scaffolds 2103 142,083 – 391 29,989 3263 Genome assembly size (Mb) 512.0 577.3 603.9 215.9 237 209.8 Coverage (%) 97.1 96.2 81.3 81.5 84.6 95 Estimated genome size (Mb) 527 600 742.3 265 280 240 No. of putative genes 42,812 43,419 57,386 27,852 31,390 34,809 No. of pseudo­chromosomes – – 17 8 8 7 Reference Wu et al.
Recommended publications
  • Stomata Size in Relation to Ploidy Level in North American Hawthorns (Crataegus, Rosaceae) Author(S): Brechann V
    Stomata Size in Relation to Ploidy Level in North American Hawthorns (Crataegus, Rosaceae) Author(s): Brechann V. McGoey Kelvin Chau Timothy A. Dickinson Source: Madroño, 61(2):177-193. 2014. Published By: California Botanical Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3120/0024-9637-61.2.177 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3120/0024-9637-61.2.177 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. MADRON˜ O, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 177–193, 2014 STOMATA SIZE IN RELATION TO PLOIDY LEVEL IN NORTH AMERICAN HAWTHORNS (CRATAEGUS,ROSACEAE) BRECHANN V. MCGOEY Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2 [email protected] KELVIN CHAU Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 1124 Finch Ave. W, Unit 2, Toronto, ON, Canada M3J 2E2 TIMOTHY A. DICKINSON Green Plant Herbarium (TRT), Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 2C6, and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2 ABSTRACT The impacts of ploidy level changes on plant physiology and ecology present interesting avenues of research, and many questions remain unanswered.
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Draft Genome Sequence of Frankia Sp. NRRL B-16219 Reveals
    Ktari et al. Standards in Genomic Sciences (2017) 12:51 DOI 10.1186/s40793-017-0261-3 EXTENDEDGENOMEREPORT Open Access Permanent draft genome sequence of Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219 reveals the presence of canonical nod genes, which are highly homologous to those detected in Candidatus Frankia Dg1 genome Amir Ktari1, Imen Nouioui1, Teal Furnholm2, Erik Swanson2, Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari1, Louis S. Tisa2 and Maher Gtari1* Abstract Frankia sp. NRRL B-16219 was directly isolated from a soil sample obtained from the rhizosphere of Ceanothus jepsonii growing in the USA. Its host plant range includes members of Elaeagnaceae species. Phylogenetically, strain NRRL B-16219 is closely related to “Frankia discariae” with a 16S rRNA gene similarity of 99.78%. Because of the lack of genetic tools for Frankia, our understanding of the bacterial signals involved during the plant infection process and the development of actinorhizal root nodules is very limited. Since the first three Frankia genomes were sequenced, additional genome sequences covering more diverse strains have helped provide insight into the depth of the pangenome and attempts to identify bacterial signaling molecules like the rhizobial canonical nod genes. The genome sequence of Frankia sp. strain NRRL B-16219 was generated and assembled into 289 contigs containing 8,032,739 bp with 71.7% GC content. Annotation of the genome identified 6211 protein-coding genes, 561 pseudogenes, 1758 hypothetical proteins and 53 RNA genes including 4 rRNA genes. The NRRL B-16219 draft genome contained genes homologous to the rhizobial common nodulation genes clustered in two areas. The first cluster contains nodACIJH genes whereas the second has nodAB and nodH genes in the upstream region.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Research Article
    1 Original Research Article 2 3 THE MALOIDEAE (ROSACEAE) STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL FEATURES 4 DETERMINING PASSIVE IMMUNITY TO MYCOSIS 5 6 7 With the help of microscopic methods the leaves and fruits surface tissues of plants of four 8 genera of the Maloideae subfamily were screened: Malus Mill., Pyrus L., Cydonia Mill., 9 Mespilus L., as model objects, and attempts were made to explain the dependence of mycosis 10 damage on microstructural features. The species composition of fungi that cause damage to the 11 Maloideae leaves and fruits in the Russia southern regions is analyzed. It is established that 12 among pathogens with different types of parasitism there are common excitants, as well as 13 highly specialized, more represented on Mespilus germanica. Higher resistance to the complex 14 of fungal diseases, in comparison with apple and pear, was found in quince and medlar. This 15 stability at the initial stage of the pathological process is associated with structural features such 16 as micromorphology of the fruits and stomata cuticle in the abaxial leaves epidermis. The leaves 17 stomatal cracks of the medlar are narrow with raised outgrowths, on the surface of the fruit – the 18 layered structure of the cuticular layer. Quince has a powerful continuous cuticular cover. 19 Compared with Malus and Pyrus, Cydonia and Mespilus also have a large (30 % or more) 20 polyphenol content in the pericarp outer layer cells. In addition to the gender-specific differences 21 in the microstructure of the integumentary tissues and the content of polyphenols affecting the 22 resistance to pathogens at the stage of their penetration, general patterns of leaf surface 23 formation, such as hypostomacy, anomocytic stomata, folded microrelief of the cuticular surface, 24 and the presence of single and multicellular trichomes are noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Production, Pomological and Nutraceutical Properties of Apricot
    1 Production, pomological and nutraceutical properties of apricot Khaled Moustafa1* and Joanna Cross2 1Editor of ArabiXiv (arabixiv.org), Paris, France 2Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde, Turkey Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Apricot (Prunus sp.) is an important fruit crop worldwide. Despite recent advances in apricot research, much is still to be done to improve its productivity and environmental adaptability. The availability of wild apricot germplasms with economically interesting traits is a strong incentive to increase research panels toward improving its economic, environmental and nutritional characteristics. New technologies and genomic studies have generated a large amount of raw data that the mining and exploitation can help decrypt the biology of apricot and enhance its agronomic values. Here, we outline recent findings in relation to apricot production, pomological and nutraceutical properties. In particular, we retrace its origin from central Asia and the path it took to attain Europe and other production areas around the Mediterranean basin while locating it in the rosaceae family and referring to its genetic diversities and new attempts of classification. The production, nutritional, and nutraceutical importance of apricot are recapped in an easy readable and comparable way. We also highlight and discuss the effects of late frost damages on apricot production over different growth stages, from swollen buds to green fruits formation. Issues related to the length of production season and biotic and abiotic environmental challenges are also discussed with future perspective on how to lengthen the production season without compromising the fruit quality and productivity. Keywords Apricot kernel oil, plum pox virus, prunus armeniaca, spring frost, stone fruit, sharka.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription
    Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7627191, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7627191 Research Article Phylogeny of Maleae (Rosaceae) Based on Multiple Chloroplast Regions: Implications to Genera Circumscription Jiahui Sun ,1,2 Shuo Shi ,1,2,3 Jinlu Li,1,4 Jing Yu,1 Ling Wang,4 Xueying Yang,5 Ling Guo ,6 and Shiliang Zhou 1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100043, China 3College of Life Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 4Te Department of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China 5Key Laboratory of Forensic Genetics, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing 100038, China 6Beijing Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, China Correspondence should be addressed to Ling Guo; [email protected] and Shiliang Zhou; [email protected] Received 21 September 2017; Revised 11 December 2017; Accepted 2 January 2018; Published 19 March 2018 Academic Editor: Fengjie Sun Copyright © 2018 Jiahui Sun et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Maleae consists of economically and ecologically important plants. However, there are considerable disputes on generic circumscription due to the lack of a reliable phylogeny at generic level. In this study, molecular phylogeny of 35 generally accepted genera in Maleae is established using 15 chloroplast regions. Gillenia isthemostbasalcladeofMaleae,followedbyKageneckia + Lindleya, Vauquelinia, and a typical radiation clade, the core Maleae, suggesting that the proposal of four subtribes is reasonable.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Inferences in Prunus (Rosaceae) Using Chloroplast Ndhf and Nuclear Ribosomal ITS Sequences 1Jun WEN* 2Scott T
    Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46 (3): 322–332 (2008) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1002.2008.08050 (formerly Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica) http://www.plantsystematics.com Phylogenetic inferences in Prunus (Rosaceae) using chloroplast ndhF and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences 1Jun WEN* 2Scott T. BERGGREN 3Chung-Hee LEE 4Stefanie ICKERT-BOND 5Ting-Shuang YI 6Ki-Oug YOO 7Lei XIE 8Joey SHAW 9Dan POTTER 1(Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, MRC 166, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA) 2(Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA) 3(Korean National Arboretum, 51-7 Jikdongni Soheur-eup Pocheon-si Gyeonggi-do, 487-821, Korea) 4(UA Museum of the North and Department of Biology and Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6960, USA) 5(Key Laboratory of Plant Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China) 6(Division of Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea) 7(State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China) 8(Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598, USA) 9(Department of Plant Sciences, MS 2, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA) Abstract Sequences of the chloroplast ndhF gene and the nuclear ribosomal ITS regions are employed to recon- struct the phylogeny of Prunus (Rosaceae), and evaluate the classification schemes of this genus. The two data sets are congruent in that the genera Prunus s.l. and Maddenia form a monophyletic group, with Maddenia nested within Prunus.
    [Show full text]
  • (Rosaceae), I. Differentiation of Mespilus and Crataegus
    Phytotaxa 257 (3): 201–229 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.257.3.1 STUDIES IN MESPILUS, CRATAEGUS, AND ×CRATAEMESPILUS (ROSACEAE), I. DIFFERENTIATION OF MESPILUS AND CRATAEGUS, EXPANSION OF ×CRATAEMESPILUS, WITH SUPPLEMENTARY OBSERVATIONS ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CRATAEGUS AND AMELANCHIER CLADES JAMES B. PHIPPS Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada; email: [email protected] Abstract The paper argues the position for retaining a monotypic Mespilus, i.e., in the sense of M. germanica, the medlar. Recent cladistic papers lend support for Mespilus being sister to Crataegus, and there is a clear morphological distinction from Cra- taegus, emphasized by adaptation to carnivore frugivory. Mespilus secured, the paper then treats each of the known hybrids between Mespilus and Crataegus, making the new combination Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps. Keywords: Crataemespilus ×canescens (J.B. Phipps) J.B. Phipps comb. nov.; inflorescence position; medlar; Mespilus a folk-genus; Mespilus distinct from Crataegus; Rosaceae; taxonomic history of Mespilus Introduction The author has a long-standing interest in generic delimitation in the Maloid genera of the Rosaceae (Maleae Small, formerly Maloideae C. Weber, Pyrinae Dumort.), as shown particularly in a series of papers with K. Robertson, J. Rohrer, and P.G. Smith (Phipps et al. 1990, 1991; Robertson at al. 1991, 1992; Rohrer at al. 1991, 1994) which treated all 28 genera of Maleae as recognised by us. There is also a revisionary treatment of New World Heteromeles M.J.
    [Show full text]
  • SMALL FRUITS - Table of Contents
    SMALL FRUITS - Table of Contents HORTICULTURAL CLASSIFICATION BRAMBLES Introduction 2 General Botany 2 Site Selection 2 Establishment 3 Pruning and Trellising 4 General Care 6 RASPBERRIES June-bearing 7 Ever-bearing 7 Raspberry Pests 8 Blackberries 8 STRAWBERRIES 9 General Botany 9 June-bearing Strawberries 9 Ever-bearing Strawberries 10 Day-neutral Strawberries 10 Site Selection 10 Establishment 11 Annual Maintenance 12 Pests and Diseases 13 GRAPES General Botany 14 Common Grape Cultivars 15 Site Selection 15 Trellising and Pruning 16 Maintenance 18 Diseases 18 OTHER SMALL FRUITS Currants 19 Gooseberries 19 Blueberries 19 Needs introductory paragraph HORTICULTURAL CLASSIFICATION OF SMALL FRUITS Common Name Family Scientific Name Type of Fruit Blackberry Rosaceae Rubus sp. aggregate Blueberry Vaccineaceae Vaccinium sp. berry Currant & Gooseberry Ribes sp. berry Grossulariaceae Elderberry Sambacus Adoxaceae berry Grape Vitaceae Vitis spp. berry Raspberry Rosacea Rubus spp. aggregate Strawberry Saxifragaceae Fragaria sp. aggregate Raspberries and blackberries are the two major bramble fruits grown in Utah. Brambles are members of the rose family and of the genus Rubus. Most plants in this genus are called brambles because of the thorns on the stems but there are some thornless cultivars. The fruit is an aggregate fruit made up of many small druplets. The raspberry fruit is made up of several rows of druplets that grow around the receptacle. When ripe, the raspberry fruit easily separates from the receptacle tissue. Blackberry fruit grows around the receptacle tissue but when ripe blackberry fruit is harvested, the receptacle tissue stays inside the fruit. General Botany All brambles have a perennial root system. Bramble canes are normally biennial, and the first year, plants produce vegetative canes (primocanes).
    [Show full text]
  • They Come in Teams
    GBE Frankia-Enriched Metagenomes from the Earliest Diverging Symbiotic Frankia Cluster: They Come in Teams Thanh Van Nguyen1, Daniel Wibberg2, Theoden Vigil-Stenman1,FedeBerckx1, Kai Battenberg3, Kirill N. Demchenko4,5, Jochen Blom6, Maria P. Fernandez7, Takashi Yamanaka8, Alison M. Berry3, Jo¨ rn Kalinowski2, Andreas Brachmann9, and Katharina Pawlowski 1,* 1Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden 2Center for Biotechnology (CeBiTec), Bielefeld University, Germany 3Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis 4Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Development, Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia 5Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, Saint Petersburg, Russia 6Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany 7Ecologie Microbienne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 5557, Universite Lyon I, Villeurbanne Cedex, France 8Forest and Forestry Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan 9Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: July 10, 2019 Data deposition: This project has been deposited at EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ under the accession PRJEB19438 - PRJEB19449. Abstract Frankia strains induce the formation of nitrogen-fixing nodules on roots of actinorhizal plants. Phylogenetically, Frankia strains can be grouped in four clusters. The earliest divergent cluster, cluster-2, has a particularly wide host range. The analysis of cluster-2 strains has been hampered by the fact that with two exceptions, they could never be cultured. In this study, 12 Frankia-enriched meta- genomes of Frankia cluster-2 strains or strain assemblages were sequenced based on seven inoculum sources. Sequences obtained via DNA isolated from whole nodules were compared with those of DNA isolated from fractionated preparations enhanced in the Frankia symbiotic structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Desirable Plant List
    Carpinteria-Summerland Fire Protection District High Fire Hazard Area Desirable Plant List Desirable Qualities for Landscape Plants within Carpinteria/Summerland High Fire Hazard areas • Ability to store water in leaves or • Ability to withstand drought. stems. • Prostrate or prone in form. • Produces limited dead and fine • Ability to withstand severe pruning. material. • Low levels of volatile oils or resins. • Extensive root systems for controlling erosion. • Ability to resprout after a fire. • High levels of salt or other compounds within its issues that can contribute to fire resistance. PLANT LIST LEGEND Geographical Area ......... ............. Water Needs..... ............. Evergreen/Deciduous C-Coastal ............. ............. H-High . ............. ............. E-Evergreen IV-Interior Valley ............. ............. M-Moderate....... ............. D-Deciduous D-Deserts ............. ............. L-Low... ............. ............. E/D-Partly or ............. ............. VL -Very Low .... ............. Summer Deciduous Comment Code 1 Not for use in coastal areas......... ............ 13 ........ Tends to be short lived. 2 Should not be used on steep slopes........ 14 ........ High fire resistance. 3 May be damaged by frost. .......... ............ 15 ........ Dead fronds or leaves need to be 4 Should be thinned bi-annually to ............ ............. removed to maintain fire safety. remove dead or unwanted growth. .......... 16 ........ Tolerant of heavy pruning. 5 Good for erosion control. ............. ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Heteromeles Arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) Photos: A
    I. SPECIES Heteromeles arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) photos: A. Montalvo Order: Rosales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Fruits (pomes) in late fall and winter. A. Subspecific taxa None recognized by Phipps (2012, 2016) in Jepson Manual or Jepson e-Flora. B. Synonyms Photinia arbutifolia (Ait.) Lindl.; Crataegus arbutifolia Ait. (McMinn 1939) Heteromeles (Lindl.) M. Roemer arbutifolia var. arbutifolia ; H. a. var. cerina (Jeps.) E. Murray; H. a. var. macrocarpa (Munz) Munz; H. salicifolia (C. Presl) Abrams (Phipps 2016) (but see I. F. Taxonomic issues). C. Common name toyon, California Christmas berry, California-holly (Painter 2016); Christmas berry (CalFlora 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data confirm thatPhotinia is the most closely related genus (Guo et al. 2011). Photinia differs in having 20 stamens, fused carpels, and stone cells in the testa as well as occurring in summer-wet environments (Phipps 1992). E. Related taxa in region None. There is only one species of Heteromeles. The closely related Photinia is primarily tropical (Meyer 2008) and not in California. Toyon's taxonomic stability may be in part related to its reproductive mode (Wells 1969). F. Taxonomic issues The three varieties of H. arbutifolia listed above in cell I. B. are currently recognized in the USDA PLANTS (2016) database. G. Other One of the most widely distributed California shrubs. Also widely planted and well-known for its bright red fruits in winter. McMinn (1939) noted it had been planted widely in parks and gardens since about 1914. From the Greek words 'heter' for different and 'malus' for apple (Munz 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Melilotus Officinalis Family: Fabaceae Common Name: Sweet Clover
    Forbs Fabaceae Liliaceae Onagraceae Orobanchaceae Papaveraceae Polygonaceae Ranunculaceae Rosaceae Astragalus umbellatus Family: Fabaceae Common name: Arctic Milk-vetch http://www.renyswildflowers.com/20820.html Hedysarum alpinum Family: Fabaceae Common name: Eskimo potato http://www.alclanativeplants.com/section2/plants/hedysarum_alpinum.htm http://www.goyert.de/cgi- local/an//db.cgi?db=default&uid=&ww=on&ID= 13033&view_records=1 Lupinus arcticus Family: Fabaceae Common name: Lupine http://www.nature.ca/discover/treasures/plnts/tr1/luplg_f.cfm http://superactiondog.com/horton/pages/arctic%20lupine%20flower.htm Melilotus officinalis Family: Fabaceae Common name: Sweet Clover http://www.gfmer.ch/TMCAM/Atlas_medicinal_plants/Melilotus _officinalis.htm ticf/fab/www/faoxct.htm http://www.mun.ca/biology/delta/arc Oxytropis campestris Family: Fabaceae Common name: Yellow or Field Oxytrope http://davesgarden.com/forums/t/479560/ http://www.flogaus-faust.de/e/oxytcamp.htm Oxytropis maydelliana Family: Fabaceae Common name: Maydell’s Oxytrope http://ghs.gresham.k12. or.us/science/ps/nature/ denali/flora/5/pea/oxy/m aydelliana.htm Vicia cracca Family: Fabaceae Common name: Vetch http://www.mtq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/reseau/gestion_eco/fleur.asp Lloydia serotina Family: Liliaceae Common name: Alp Lily http://www.swcoloradowildflowers.com/Whit http://efloras.org/object_page.aspx?object_id= e%20Enlarged%20Photo%20Pages/lloydia 7851&flora_id=1 %20serotina.htm Epilobium angustifolium Family: Onagraceae Common name: Fireweed http://www.heilpflanzen- suchmaschine.de/weidenroeschen/w
    [Show full text]